DEFENCE AREA 8 HARTFORD END



Similar documents
Mount Browne (Surrey Police Head Quarters), Sandy Lane, Guildford Vision Statement. November with

US 5th Army in Italy Battle of Cassino January-February 1944

Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury. Persimmon Homes Midlands March 2015

Application by National Grid Gas plc for the River Humber Gas Pipeline replacement (the application)

Bedwyn Brail, Wiltshire: Geophysical and Earthworks Survey

Design Guidance for Perimeter Fencing at Schools for Nottinghamshire County Council

Report Connecticut River Valley Project Chelsea Substation Expansion Chelsea, Vermont

STRATFORD CAMPUS, UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESKTOP STUDY

THE BELGIAN ARMY IN 1940

Rural Settlement Patterns

10.1 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS AND LANDSCAPING (FULL - MINOR)

Erection of replacement warehouse building and erection of two buildings in connection with builder s merchants

A historic sea wall revealed; archaeological trial-trenching at the Proctor & Gamble London site, West Thurrock, Essex February 2013

Curragh History Archives

Assessment of Site Deliverability in the Market Towns

A new Garden Neighbourhood for West Guildford An opportunity for Smart Growth. university of surrey November 2013

Tillworth Bungalow, Hawkchurch, Axminster, Devon EX13 5UB

Manthorpe Grantham Conservation Area

Residential design guidance: Roof extensions

BASILDON BOROUGH COUNCIL

Sample Guidelines. for Solar Systems. in Historic Districts. National Alliance of Preservation Commissions

Weekend Cabin Retreat Project Site Plans

KENCOT HILL SOLAR PARK, OXFORDSHIRE PLANNING BRIEFING DOCUMENT. on behalf of MR TAD CZAPSKI FEBRUARY 2011

approval of matters specified in conditions; and The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013

1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk

Croft House Lodge Tree Removal and Building Relocation Mitigation Report. November 2010

National Alliance of Preservation Commissions Sample Guidelines for Solar Panels in Historic Districts

Allied Forces North African Theater of Operations 13 May 1943

Stowmarket Area Action Plan (AAP) Examination

Glossop Design & Place Making Strategy

Didcot Further Expansion

How To Develop A School In A Parkland Area Of A Village

G e r m a n T O & E TABLE OF CONTENTS. PANZER German TO&E

Kings Road, Beith. Development Brief. Part 1: Site Specific Information

Site Deliverability Statement Alternative Site at: Bridge Road, Old St Mellons

Councillor R. Hollingworth has requested that this application be considered by the Committee, rather than being determined under delegated powers.

DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR UTILITY METERS D.C. HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD

DENSITY AND PUBLIC SPACE AT BISHOP STREET

Palmer Street/Great Barr Street, (former MacDermid warehouse), Digbeth, Birmingham, B9 4AY

Land at Cofton Lake Road Cofton Hackett

1 Welcome. The exhibition comprises a series of boards which provide some background information to show you our initial ideas for the site.

OPEN SOURCE INFORMATION FOR LAND AND PROPERTY MATTERS IN THE UK

Exempted Development - Frequently Asked Questions

Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy. Green Belt Settlement Assessments Published December 2014

Local Development Framework Listed Buildings: Works to or affecting the setting of

APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION FOR A SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY AT KINGS CLIFFE LANDFILL SITE, STAMFORD, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE

CLASS U - MILITARY SCIENCE

FLOOD RISK RECENT TRENDS AND POLICY RESPONSES

To invite the Planning and Environment Committee to decide on an approach to dealing with pavement obstructions in the centre of town.

Planning & Building Control Division. Development. East Ayrshire Planning. Design Guidance

Harris Hydraulics Laboratory Pumphouse Fall Guard Addendum to the Historic Resources Addendum

Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc. Mark J. Quimby Project Consultant

Construction Traffic Management Plan

Tree Condition Survey for Proposed Taplow Footbridge at Ray Mill Island and Taplow Riverside, Mill Lane Taplow, Buckinghamshire

HANWORTH PARK Boundary: Date of Designation: Date of alteration and extension: Additional protection to the area:

An archaeological watching brief at Deyncourt Gardens, Upminster (London Borough of Havering) March-April 2006

North Herts Landscape Study (Character, Sensitivity and Capacity)

Licensed Premises Warmington Oundle

Finding of No Significant Impact

(

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

Development Brief Erskine Lodge Site, Great Whelnetham

LANDSCAPE AND DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST FOR MONMOUTHSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

OFFICES TO LET Hackthorpe Hall Nr Penrith Cumbria

IRON STORM (WALKTHROUGH)

Earls Court Farm Worcester

Sector Design Concepts

The National WWII Museum D-Day Virtual Field Trip videoconference TEACHER GUIDE

1816, Independence Hall 1850, Washington s Headquarters

1.1 CONSERVATION & RESTORATION. Conservation & Restoration. Introduction

Key Themes for Langham s Neighbourhood Plan

GREENFIELD LODGE FARM, STRIXTON, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE

Description of Simandou Archaeological Potential Model. 13A.1 Overview

Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory

The Barn Site, Park Prewett, Basingstoke, Hampshire

PLANNING & REGULATION COMMITTEE 16 JANUARY 2012

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

Fort Barry Radio and Switchboard Room

Mulberry Farmhouse SANDY LANE LOWER FAILAND

Appendix To Operational Review and Recommendations For Juniper Golf Course

VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS

Moon Phases and Tides in the Planning the D-Day Invasion Part I: The Phases of the Moon

2. Settlement Plan. 2. Settlement Plan

Design and Access Statement Earls Court Road London SW5 9RH

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY

EN AVANT! EN MASSE! Game Control Rules August 2008

Development proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-

Planning and Listed Building Consent Applications for the retention of a fence, to part of the perimeter to Gayton Hall, Gayton, Wirral.

Big Black Mesa Wildlife Water Development Plan

BERMUDA MARITIME SECURITY (HARBOUR AREAS) (RESTRICTED ZONES) ORDER 2010 BR 79 / 2010

"Description of the urban and architectural development conceptual design of the historical city centre of Gorzow Wlkp. R3DC4T

Oil Spill Clean-up by Homeowner in Ohio *

Residential Plan Review Emergency Vehicle Access and Water Supply Permit Information Packet

Your Home and Planning Permission. A guide for householders in Northern Ireland

6 Streetscape character 6.1

Evaluating the Condition of Seawalls/Bulkheads

DESIGN GUIDANCE NOTE: 11 PORCHES

Siting and settlement: The most important way to protect shelter from floods is to build in a place that is unlikely to be flooded.

OPERATIONS IN SOMALIA CAMPAIGN PARTICIPATION CREDIT

Walsall Council Validation Guide for submitting a Householder Planning Application

Transcription:

DEFENCE AREA 8 HARTFORD END 1. Area details: The defence area is 6 miles SE of Great Dunmow and 8 miles N of Chelmsford. County: Essex. Parish: Great Waltham. NGR: centre of area, TL 689175. 1.1 Area Description: [see Map 1]. The defence area lies in the shallow valley of the River Chelmer, approximately mid-way between Great Dunmow and Chelmsford, overlooked by higher land to the west. East of the village of Ford End is Hartford End, a small settlement at a crossing of the river, dominated today, as it was in 1940, by the buildings of a brewery. Beyond Hartford End, the river turns south to cross the A130 road at a point some 1½ miles south-east of Ford End. The defence area follows the course of the river from a point north of Ford End (beyond which the defence works do not survive) via Hartford End to the A130 crossing point, which provides a southern boundary. The defence works are all on the southern or western bank of the river, which flows through a landscape of broad arable fields interspersed with clumps of woodland, in particular on the river margins. The focal point of the area is Hartford End, from which the defence structures can be accessed both to the west and south-east by a network of public footpaths. The course of the valley allows viewsheds within which defence structures are almost continuously in view. 2. Assessment. 2.1 Defences: [see Map 2] Defence overview - In the period June - August 1940, a General Headquarters Line (GHQ Line) was constructed as a continuous fortified anti-tank barrier from the North Somerset Coast, running south of London, and crossing the Thames to cut through Essex and Cambridgeshire on a course parallel with the east coast as far as Richmond in Yorkshire. The aim was the protection of London and the industrial cities of the Midlands from ground attack had the German army made a lodgement on the south or east coasts. The GHQ Line was fortified with infantry and anti-tank gun emplacements (pillboxes) which often had wired, and sometimes mined, perimeter defences. It linked with a related system of defence in depth that incorporated roadblocks, and Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 1 of 10

'defended places' 1. A demolition belt also followed the Line, with road and rail bridges being prepared for destruction in the event of an invasion. Fig. 1 - The course of the GHQ Line [dark line] defending the war production centres, Summer 1940. 2 Fig. 2 - The course of the GHQ Line passing through Hartford End is shown on this map from the war diary of XI Corps. 3 1 A 'defended place' was the preferred term in this area of Eastern Command for what was elsewhere known as a 'nodal point', a 'focal point', or a 'defended locality'. It had an approved garrison of sufficient strength to hold its defences. The garrison could be troops of the Field Army or the Home Guard (sometime both). 2 from 'Defence Plans for the United Kingdom, 1939-1945' (monograph by Historical Section, Cabinet Office) - PRO WO 277/37. 3 TNA: PRO WO 166/329/1. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 2 of 10

The study defence area was but one sector of this stop line whose defences were continuous following a natural or artificial anti-tank obstacle. The area has a particular importance because of the high percentage of hardened defence works that survive out of the total number that were built. Hartford End was a Class 'C' defended place in North Essex Sub-District, having a minimum garrison of two battle platoons provided by the 11th Bn. Essex Home Guard. 4 It was set around a bridge over the River Chelmer, the bridge being mined for demolition and a Canadian pipe mine, designed to cause an anti-tank crater when blown, placed alongside. An important source is an aerial photograph taken by the Luftwaffe on 31st August 1940. The great majority of defence sites shown on this photograph survive, and it enabled several, otherwise hidden by dense vegetation, to be located by subsequent fieldwork. The 1:50,000 map made by the Germans from information acquired by this aerial reconnaissance is Sheet 108 in the series 'Befestigungskarte Großbritannien'. This, however, only appears to survive at the German military archives in Freiburg, and it has not been possible to consult it. Fig. 3 - Portion of a German reconnaissance photograph taken on 31 August 1940. A high percentage of the defence works indicated by the symbols [triangles are kleinkampfanlage (fieldworks: primarily pillboxes)] survive. The village of Ford End is towards the bottom left and Hartford End, the upper left. 4 TNA: PRO WO 166/14392. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 3 of 10

The defence works - The surviving defence works provide excellent examples of the different types of light and heavier infantry pillboxes, some with anti-aircraft gun mounts, as well as the variant form of rectangular, shell-proof pillbox with detached blast wall that is particular to Eastern Command. In addition, an anti-tank gun emplacement defends the bridge at Hartford End, where spigot mortar pedestals can also be seen. All these defence works are concrete-faced, i.e. they were built with exterior wood-shuttering, although for the interior, corrugated-iron shuttering, as well as other forms of metal sheeting, were often used, much of which is still in situ. Fig. 4 - UORN 12995: an unusual pattern of iron sheeting used as shuttering for the interior of a type 24 pillbox Infantry pillboxes were located in forward positions on the south bank of the River Chelmer (this becomes the west bank with the turn of the river to the south). In the main, these were the heavier pillboxes - thick-walled, hexagonal type 24s and the square Eastern Command-type. Further back were lighter pillboxes, principally the hexagonal type 22, to provide a sweeping, inter-locking fire down the slope to the river. The effect of this carefully arranged fortification was to create a prepared killing ground that can still be visualised today. Fig. 5 - UORN 7571: Eastern Command type of heavy infantry pillbox with detached external blast wall. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 4 of 10

Fig. 6 - UORN 12995: an excellent example of a shell-proof type 24 pillbox with chamfered roof edges dug into the bank of the River Chelmer west of Hartford End. Fig. 7 - UORN 12997: a type 22 pillbox with a field of fire covering the slopes to the rear of the heavier front-line pillbox, UORN 7583, near Hartford End mill. The anti-tank gun emplacement [UORN 7186] at Hartford End is of the rare two chambered type 28A, and it can be viewed both externally and internally as it lies next to a public right of way. Its role in the defence of the bridge at Hartford End, together with spigot mortars and other pillboxes, can be seen clearly on the ground. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 5 of 10

Fig. 8 - UORN 7186: interior of the anti-tank gun emplacement commanding Hartford End bridge, with some of its corrugated-iron shuttering still in place. A further anti-tank gun emplacement stood near Warner's Farm in the south of the defence area, but was destroyed in road widening works in the 1970s. Fig. 9 - UORNs 7587 (top) and 7584: variants on an hexagonal pillbox with a central well for anti-aircraft fire. These pillboxes are now so overgrown that this feature is not easily seen on the ground. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 6 of 10

2.2 Landscape: The evidence of aerial photographs shows that the arable fields to the west and south of Hartford End have been 'opened-up' considerably by the removal of hedgerows, causing some pillboxes to be isolated in the centre of fields where once they were positioned close to field boundaries. Nonetheless, the overall pattern of field and woodland remains largely unaltered, and there has been little development to impede on the Second World War landscape, although some widening and straightening of the A130 road that runs across the southern base of the area has taken place. The defence area is crossed by a network of public footpaths that allow most of the defence works to be readily accessed. South-east of Hartford End, a footpath runs beside six pillboxes, in two instances passing between the blast wall and the main structure. The landscape towards the southern extent of the defence area is almost park-like, and there is little fencing to prevent the walker approaching the pillboxes that lie off the public footpaths. This is an excellent, accessible tract of countryside where the many defence works can be seen in relation to the topography that determined their siting. Fig. 10 - Aerial photograph taken in 1948 showing the southern extent of the defence area with many pillboxes visible to the left of the central sinuous course of the River Chelmer. The countryside was then more enclosed than today, and some pillboxes lie against hedgerows that have now disappeared. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 7 of 10

Fig. 11 -. Today, the defence works seem to merge naturally with the colours of the landscape, and have become accepted as part of it rather than standing out as eye-sores [UORN 7575].. 2.3 Statement of Significance: The defence area provides an excellent illustration of the heavily fortified nature of the GHQ Line as it crossed Essex on its course to the north. The hardened defence works survive almost in their entirety, and their siting in relation to the principal front-edge anti-tank obstacle of the River Chelmer can be understood. The locations of the defence works, where they form inter-locking fields of fire, can be readily appreciated. Differing types of structures and their methods of construction can be seen, from a large anti-tank gun emplacement to heavy infantry pillboxes near the river and their lighter counterparts set further away. In addition, the positioning of the defences of the 'defended place' of Hartford End, commanded by heavy emplacements and with spigot mortar pedestals surviving on the river banks, is of particular interest. A 'pillbox walk' could be established using the existing public footpath system that crosses a large part of the defence area. In fact, two such walks could be described, one west of Hartford End and the other to its south, with Hartford End itself acting as a central point for the beginning and end of each walk. Car parking is possible in a lay-by south of Hartford End close to pillbox, UORN 7581. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 8 of 10

3. Recommendations: Local Plan - presumption that the character and grain of the defence area will be retained by preserving existing field patterns, woodland, housing density. Consideration as a rural Conservation Area? 1. That, within the more general constraint given above, the surviving antiinvasion defence works lying both to the west and south of Hartford End, be considered of national importance. They enable this sector of the GHQ Line to be interpreted, and provide evidence of the articulation of the defence and the inter-relationship of its functionally different components. Such interpretation is assisted by the documentary evidence provided in this report of defence structures that were built as part of the overall strategy, but which have now been removed. 2. That the anti-invasion defences of the 'defended place' of Hartford End also be considered of national importance. They enable the importance of this river crossing to be understood and the siting of the different components of its defence to be understood. 3. That, in a possible initiative with Essex County Council and the local authority, a 'pillbox walk' be established and that information boards about the anti-invasion defences of the GHQ Line, and of Hartford End in particular, be provided. 4. Supporting material. 4.1 Photographs: Fig. 3 - 'Taktisches Luftbildbuch', p61 (31.8.1940) - IWM, uncatalogued. Fig. 9 - TL 6717/2 (826/59) (7.7.1975) - NMR. Fig. 10 - CPE/UK/2467 fr.5257 (9.3.1948) - NMR. Figs. 4-8 and 11 - taken (AWF) during field survey, 14.5.2002 and 16.5.2002. 4.2 Documentary Sources: 'Taktisches Luftbildbuch', 23.10.40 (IWM, uncatalogued). 'Operation Instruction No.15', 24.7.1942 (from Essex Sub-Area War Diary) - TNA: PRO WO 166/6738. XI Corps 'G' HQ War Diary, 1940-1941 - TNA: PRO WO 166/329. 'Essex and Suffolk Area Defence Scheme' (with map), 1942 (from Essex and Suffolk Area War Diary) - TNA: PRO WO 166/6700. 'Operation Instruction No.12', 5.4.1944 (from Essex and Suffolk District War Diary) - TNA: PRO WO 166/14392. 4.3 Aerial Photographs: 106G/UK/1367 frs. 5184, 7165, 7184, 7186 (3.4.1946) - NMR. CPE/UK/2361 fr.5298 (15.10.47) - NMR. CPE/UK/2467 fr.5257 (9.3.48) - NMR. TL 6717/2 (826/59) (7.7.75) - NMR. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 9 of 10

4.4 Ordnance Survey 1: 2500 Plans: TL 6816 (1976) - BLML TL 6915 (1976) - BLML. 4.5 Essex Sites and Monuments Record: Essex SMR records checked and SMR references added to 4.6 below. 4.6 Defence of Britain Project Database: [see 5. 'Annex']. Report on Hartford End (Defence Area 5) - page 10 of 10