Transportation Network Companies (TNCs)



Similar documents
Commissioner Catherine Sandoval California Public Utilities Commission

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

The Sharing Economy and Transportation Network Companies Katie School/CPCU Spring Symposium April 16, 2015 Marriott Hotel, Normal, IL

California Department of Insurance Investigatory Hearing Background White Paper

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Overview of Ride-sharing Regulations and Insurance Southeastern Regulators Association Brad Nail, Insurance Policy Manager, Uber.

The Most Affordable Cities For Individuals to Buy Health Insurance

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 117

CHALLENGES FACED BY AIRPORTS TO REGULATE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES (TNC s)

APPENDIX 1: SURVEY. Copyright 2010 Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC. All rights reserved.

AN ACT REGULATING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES.

Lodging, Rental Car and Meal Taxes on Travelers in the Top 50 U.S. Cities

National Bureau for Academic Accreditation And Education Quality Assurance PUBLIC HEALTH

AN ORDINANCE TO RECOGNIZE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

Transportation Network Companies

Atlanta Rankings 2014

Order Instituting Rulemaking on Regulations Relating to Passenger Carriers, Ridesharing, and New Online-Enabled Transportation Services.

Number of Liver Transplants Performed Updated October 2005

Transportation Network Company Legislative Issue Status April 13, 2015 Update

TNC Insurance Compromise Model Bill March 24, 2015 v2

Employee Benefits Alert

Form LM-3 Common Reporting Errors

UBER/SIDECAR/LYFT ARE THEY IN INSURANCE LIMBO?

Cancellation/Nonrenewal Surplus Lines Exemptions

Grantee City State Award. Maricopa County Phoenix AZ $749,999. Colorado Youth Matter Denver CO $749,900

Supplemental Handout TNC Insurance Compromise Model Bill Updated March 26

House Substitute for SENATE BILL No. 117

U.S. NEWS RANKING OF MEDICAL COLLEGES 2012

Additional information >>> HERE <<< Getting Free Instant Access freight broker training and job placement - Review

Transportation Network Companies: Insurance Coverage Challenges and Implications

Obtaining and Maintaining Minnesota Intrastate For-Hire Operating Authority Minnesota Trucking Regulations

in Large Cities,

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 13-2 RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES (TNCs)

Part-Time Uber Partner-Drivers Are Fundamentally Different From Existing Taxi Operations

Ethernet Access (Formerly Converged Ethernet Access) Operations Manual

(Adopted October 9, 2007)

Comprehensive Course Schedule

Auto Insurance in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

US News & World Report Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs: Specialty Rankings 2014 Rankings Published in September 2013

Department of Veterans Affairs Quarterly Notice to Congress on Data Breaches Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2015 April 1, 2015 through June 30, 2015

Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of Arizona, Inc.

The MetLife Market Survey of Assisted Living Costs

ITIL Foundation. Learn about process improvements, benefits, and challenges of ITIL, and get your ITIL Foundation certification.

The MetLife Market Survey of Nursing Home & Home Care Costs

ANGELOUECONOMICS 2012 INDUSTRY HOTSPOTS

Post-Secondary Schools Offering Undergraduate Programs Including Arabic Language/Literature. University name Location Degree offered

Solar America Initiative Solar America Cities

How To Know The Nursing Workforce

Rates are valid through March 31, 2014.

HORIZON LOCATIONS. HORIZON FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC Service Locations: MC # Chaska, MN Logistics.

claims reporting guide and office directory Delivering unparalleled results

Q Utility Rebate Report. Fort Worth, TX

National Bureau for Academic Accreditation And Education Quality Assurance LINGUISTICS # UNIVERSITY CITY STATE DEGREE MAJOR SPECIALTY RESTRICTION

COM/MP1/avs PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #12291(Rev. 4) Quasi-Legislative 9/19/2013 Item 39

The Housing Downturn in the United States 2009 First Quarter Update

Canal Commercial Combination Insurance Application Entire Application Must Be Completed and Signed

Research Results Digest 366

Made Possible by Generous Support From: RETAIL INSIGHT. Spotlight On Retail Employees

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE MATCH RESULTS FOR 2015

EMPLOYER PAY OR PLAY EXCISE TAXES WHERE ARE WE NOW?

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE MATCH RESULTS FOR CLASS OF Anesthesiology Dermatology - 4

List of Allocation Recipients

DON T JUST MAKE A LIVING. MAKE LIVING BETTER. ENGINEERING & OPERATIONS OPPORTUNITIES

Agenda. City of Mississauga. Public Vehicle Advisory Committee. Date 2015/12/07 Time 9:30 AM. Location. Members. Contact.

Zurich Surety. Capabilities you can count on

EXAMINING COSTS AND TRENDS OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS IN MASSACHUSETTS

Legjobban fizetõ Adsense kulcsszavak toplistája 2008/2009 idõszak - 1. rész

WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ACT MEMO

Taxicab and Livery Crashes in New York City 2004

Lawrence P. Katzenstein Partner

Project Lead Location Amount Project Description. American Lung Association in Minnesota

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE MATCH RESULTS FOR CLASS OF Anesthesiology - 9. Dermatology - 1. Emergency Medicine - 12

Motor Carrier Forms Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SPECIAL FRAUD ALERT FRAUD AND ABUSE IN NURSING HOME ARRANGEMENTS WITH HOSPICES

Minneapolis Transportation Network Companies (TNC) Ordinance

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE MATCH RESULTS FOR 2011

NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF INSURANCE LEGISLATORS (NCOIL)

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE MATCH RESULTS FOR 2014

Federal Trade Commission Sharing Economy Workshop Project No. P New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission Public Comment

UBER FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW

Transcription:

Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) Regulatory Issues, Legislation & Litigation June 9, 2014 Seattle, Washington By Professor Matthew W. Daus, Esq. IATR President

Presented By Professor Matthew W. Daus, Esq. Distinguished Lecturer, US DOT Transportation Research Center, City University of NY President, IATR Partner & Chairman, Transportation Practice Group Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP Contact: mdaus@iatr.org 156 West 56th Street New York, NY 10019 T. 212.237.1106 F. 212.262.1215

MODEL REGULATIONS & POLICY/LEGAL REPORTS REPORTS 1. Model Regulations: Smartphone Application Technology for Taxicabs & Limousines. http://www.windelsmarx.com/resources/documents/iatr %20Model%20Regulations%20(10890808).pdf 2. Ridesharing Applications: Illegal Hitchhiking for Hire or Sustainable Group Riding? http://www.windelsmarx.com/resources/documents/ridesh aring%20%20report.pdf 3. Rogue Smartphone Applications for Taxicabs and

MODEL REGULATIONS Clear Definitions of For-Hire Transportation Model Regulations: Smartphone Application Technology for Taxicabs & Limousines. E-Hail = Pre-arrangement License Requirements Use of Taxi, Taxicab, Cab or Hack in the App Name Accessible Transportation Fares Smartphone Apps = Taximeters Indemnification

MODEL REGULATIONS Does Ridesharing Require a Predetermined Route? The advent of ridesharing apps have allowed for rideshare passengers and drivers to connect in real-time & trips to be planned on an ad hoc basis Rideshare apps allow passengers to designate particular pick-up and drop-off locations, much like dispatchers of traditional taxicabs and/or other livery and for-hire vehicles. Some have criticized this feature of modern ridesharing as veering too far into the model of ground transportation operations.

MODEL REGULATIONS Should Compensation to Drivers be Permitted? One of the most contentious issues presented by the advent of the new ridesharing apps are whether they are providing traditional ridesharing services; a free service that is provided for societal benefits, or a for-profit or compensation based ridesharing. Some consider payments as another useful incentive to promote ridesharing. However, the competing view, is that when money is exchanged for services, the motive behind providing such services becomes for-profit and as such, the service itself becomes a for-profit enterprise.

MODEL REGULATIONS Registration of Companies that Coordinate Ridesharing Another proposal that is being discussed among regulators is to hold companies that coordinate and/or broker ridesharing services accountable to local transportation agencies in some way, even if the services do not involve compensation for ridesharing. Two competing views 1. Registration & technology monitoring will help assess rideshare service impacts on traffic, the environment and transportation access issues. 2. The government does not have a right to such information unless the companies fall within the jurisdiction of the local government in some capacity.

MODEL REGULATION Insurance Issues Another major issue presented by ridesharing apps is whether the personal vehicle coverage policies that are maintained by regular, noncommercial drivers, would extend to cover trips made under a compensation rideshare. Statement from Personal Insurance Federation of CA It appears that the industry standard for personal auto insurance... is to exempt from insurance coverage claims involving vehicles used for transporting passengers for a charge. Thus, in situations where a vehicle is insured as a private vehicle and is used to transport passengers for a fee, no insurance coverage would exist.... The issue before the CPUC is not ridesharing, but instead using a private passenger vehicle in a livery service. This is clearly not covered under a standard policy; if an accident occurs, coverage would not exist.

REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE ACTION Austin, TX California Chicago, IL Colorado Houston, TX Jacksonville, FL Miami, FL Milwaukee, WI Minneapolis, MN Nashville, TN New York, NY New Orleans, LA Philadelphia, PA Portland, WA Seattle, WA St. Paul, MN Washington, DC

NEW LICENSING CATEGORIES NEW ORDINANCES REGULATING RIDESHARING, LIMOUSINE LICENSING AND OPERATIONS. Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) Transportation Network Providers (TNPs) Transportation Network Services (TNSs)

NEW LICENSING CATEGORIES - CALIFORNIA Created category of TNCs which must be licensed with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), conduct criminal background checks, train drivers, and hold commercial insurance policies with at least $1M per-incident coverage. Also Assembly Bill 2068 would direct the CPUC to adopt rules that would require (i) TNCs to adopt a drug and alcohol testing program and (ii) TNCs place permanent markings on the rear bumper of each vehicle providing TNC services that can be easily seen by the public. The CPUC decision regarding TNCs is in effect, but its actual effect on the public, industry, environment will be evaluated this Fall to determine if further rulemaking is necessary.

NEW LICENSING CATEGORIES - ILLINOIS Chicago passed a ridesharing ordinance: Allows licensing if meets vehicle inspection and required insurance requirements, different from the requirements of taxicabs or limousines. New license category = Transportation Network Provider : must register with city for annual $25,000 fee, submit to annual inspections of vehicles by cities, and hold commercial liability insurance.

NEW LICENSING CATEGORIES - ILLINOIS The Illinois Senate and House passed more stringent rideshare legislation than Chicago: (i) prohibits ridesharing vehicles from pickups and drop-offs at airports and convention centers; (ii) prohibits rideshare drivers from using vehicles more than four years after their date of manufacture; (iii) requires that vehicles have signage indicating the rideshare company that it is affiliated with; (iv) prohibits ridesharing services from charging more for a ride than a taxi would be allowed to charge for the same ride under local law; and (v) limits electronic payment of ridesharing fares to exclude tips tips will be accepted if paid directly to the driver and not through the ridesharing app.

NEW LICENSING CATEGORIES D.C. (Pending) Under the proposed Transportation Network Services Innovation Act of 2014 ( Bill 20-753 ) drivers of rideshare companies will not receive a license from the District of Columbia Taxicab Commission (the DCTC ) to provide ridesharing service and the DCTC would not receive any routine information as part of the application process. Bill 20-753 would also allow vehicles from any state to participate in providing service and expressly forbids the DCTC from requiring companies or drivers to collect or transmit data about a customer or a customer s trip. With regard to insurance policies in connection with ridesharing applications, Bill 20-753 establishes that the ridesharing vehicle operator s personal auto insurance policy is primarily responsible for any accidents and that the Transportation Network Service Company s commercial auto liability insurance would be secondarily responsible.

NEW LICENSING CATEGORIES COLORADO On June 5, 2014, Gov. John Hickenlooper signed into law a bill that officially authorizes ride-sharing services. Ride-sharing companies will be required to obtain permits from the PUC and carry at least $1 million in liability insurance. The companies, or their drivers, will also be required to carry primary insurance coverage during the controversial gap period - when a driver is soliciting fares but has not been matched with a rider. Rideshare drivers will not be required to undergo the same criminal background checks that taxi drivers face and will remain vetted by private companies that use publicly available data.

Boston, MA Chicago, IL Columbus, OH Houston, TX Los Angeles, CA New York San Francisco, CA Seattle, WA St. Louis, MO Disruptive App Litigation Update

Lanham Act Causes of Action Interference with Contractual Relations Interference with Prospective Economic Relations Unfair Competition Breach of Contract Negligence RICO Independent Contractor Misclassification Consumer Protection/Deceptive Acts & Practices

International Association of Transportation Regulators (IATR) 2014 Annual Conference New Orleans Hyatt Regency, September 21st -24th Theme: A New World Order for Ground Transportation Regulation

CONFERENCE REGISTRATION IS NOW OPEN AT IATR.ORG

CONFERENCE PROGRAM TECHNOLOGY HIGHLIGHTS Apps Around the World Smartphone App Regulation & Deregulation Legislative, Regulatory & Litigation Update Smartphone App Debate

CONFERENCE PROGRAM Apps Around the World Day 2 Tuesday, September 23, 2014 Apps Around the World An overview of the status of smartphone transportation app proliferation around the globe will be provided, with an emphasis on: business model characteristics; data collection; logistics applications; cross-modal services; cross-fleet, world-wide and government apps; functionality; private equity financing; and medallion financing implications. Technology companies, experts and regulators will opine on international approaches, and prognosticate on future trends.

CONFERENCE PROGRAM Smartphone App Regulation & Deregulation Legislative, Regulatory & Litigation Update Day 3 Wednesday, September 24, 2014 Smartphone App Regulation & Deregulation Legislative, Regulatory & Litigation Update Regulators, lawyers, lobbyists, industry stakeholders, insurance experts, and others will provide an overview of the most recent lawsuits, legislative efforts involving transportation network or rideshare licensing schemes, deregulation, implementation of the IATR s model regulations, and regulators who have successfully held their ground.

CONFERENCE PROGRAM Smartphone App Debate Day 3 Wednesday, September 24, 2014 Smartphone App Debate Regulators, industry stakeholders, technology companies, financial institution representatives, and other stakeholders and experts will mix-itup with a debate on a host of hot topics related to new sharing economy licensing categories, deregulation attempts, minimum fare and waiting time laws, and the future of transportation regulation, policy and the industry s viability.

Thank You NCSTS!