How To Play A Static Bayesian Game



Similar documents
ECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2015

Midterm March (a) Consumer i s budget constraint is. c i b i c i H 12 (1 + r)b i c i L 12 (1 + r)b i ;

Bayesian Nash Equilibrium

Cournot s model of oligopoly

Chapter 7. Sealed-bid Auctions

Advanced Microeconomics

UCLA. Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory

Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second Price Auction:

Optimal Auctions Continued

EconS Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Cheap Talk

Market Power, Forward Trading and Supply Function. Competition

Optimal Auctions. Jonathan Levin 1. Winter Economics 285 Market Design. 1 These slides are based on Paul Milgrom s.

8 Modeling network traffic using game theory

Computational Learning Theory Spring Semester, 2003/4. Lecture 1: March 2

6.207/14.15: Networks Lectures 19-21: Incomplete Information: Bayesian Nash Equilibria, Auctions and Introduction to Social Learning

Lecture 11: The Design of Trading Platforms (Alos-Ferrer et al. 2010)

FINAL EXAM, Econ 171, March, 2015, with answers

Paid Placement: Advertising and Search on the Internet

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games

Games of Incomplete Information

Cheap Talk : Multiple Senders and Multiple Receivers

Economics 203: Intermediate Microeconomics I Lab Exercise #11. Buy Building Lease F1 = 500 F1 = 750 Firm 2 F2 = 500 F2 = 400

1 Representation of Games. Kerschbamer: Commitment and Information in Games

Information in Mechanism Design

Pricing Cloud Computing: Inelasticity and Demand Discovery

Do not open this exam until told to do so.

Games of Incomplete Information

ECON Game Theory Exam 1 - Answer Key. 4) All exams must be turned in by 1:45 pm. No extensions will be granted.

Oligopoly and Strategic Pricing

Covert Networks and the Antitrust Policy

Oligopoly and Trade. Notes for Oxford M.Phil. International Trade. J. Peter Neary. University of Oxford. November 26, 2009

Class Notes, Econ 8801 Lump Sum Taxes are Awesome

Oligopoly: Cournot/Bertrand/Stackelberg

Herding, Contrarianism and Delay in Financial Market Trading

How To Solve A Minimum Set Covering Problem (Mcp)

A Theory of Auction and Competitive Bidding

Lecture Notes 10

The Binomial Distribution

Game Theory: Supermodular Games 1

Normalization and Mixed Degrees of Integration in Cointegrated Time Series Systems

Parimutuel versus Fixed-Odds Markets

The Basics of Game Theory

How to Solve Strategic Games? Dominant Strategies

How to Sell a (Bankrupt) Company

INDIRECT INFERENCE (prepared for: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition)

How To Understand The Theory Of Economic Theory

On the e ect of taxation in the online sports betting market 1. Juan Vidal-Puga 1 SUMMARY

A simple analysis of the TV game WHO WANTS TO BE A MILLIONAIRE? R

Financial Markets. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

MobLab Game Catalog For Business Schools Fall, 2015

Problem Set 2 Due Date: March 7, 2013

Reinforcement Learning

WARWICK ECONOMIC RESEARCH PAPERS

Portfolio selection based on upper and lower exponential possibility distributions

The Black-Scholes pricing formulas

Adverse Selection. Chapter 3

Department of Chemical Engineering ChE-101: Approaches to Chemical Engineering Problem Solving MATLAB Tutorial VI

Decision Theory Rational prospecting

Moral Hazard. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models

A Simpli ed Axiomatic Approach to Ambiguity Aversion

Oligopoly markets: The price or quantity decisions by one rm has to directly in uence pro ts by other rms if rms are competing for customers.

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 1: Introduction

Bias in the Estimation of Mean Reversion in Continuous-Time Lévy Processes

Fixed Point Theorems

THE NON-EQUIVALENCE OF EXPORT AND IMPORT QUOTAS

Credible Discovery, Settlement, and Negative Expected Value Suits

Sharp and Diffuse Incentives in Contracting

Online shopping and platform design with ex ante registration requirements

A Game Theoretical Framework for Adversarial Learning

Interlinkages between Payment and Securities. Settlement Systems

Economics II: Micro Fall 2009 Exercise session 5. Market with a sole supplier is Monopolistic.

Web Appendix for Reference-Dependent Consumption Plans by Botond Kőszegi and Matthew Rabin

Computing the Electricity Market Equilibrium: Uses of market equilibrium models

5 Market Games For Teaching Economics

4. Simple regression. QBUS6840 Predictive Analytics.

Least-Squares Intersection of Lines

Vickrey-Dutch Procurement Auction for Multiple Items

Coordination in Network Security Games

15 Limit sets. Lyapunov functions

Modeling Internet Security Investments Tackling Topological Information Uncertainty

Transcription:

Advanced Microeconomics Static Bayesian games Harald Wiese University of Leipzig Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics / 7

Part E. Bayesian games and mechanism design Static Bayesian games The revelation principle and mechanism design Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics / 7

Static Bayesian games Conditional probability Introduction and an example 3 De nitions 4 The Cournot model with one sided cost uncertainty 5 Revisiting mixed-strategy equilibria 6 The rst-price auction Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 3 / 7

Conditional probability De nition Given: nonempty set M, probability distribution prob on M; events A and B. If prob (B) 6= 0, the conditional probability of A given B is de ned by prob (A jb ) = prob (A \ B). prob (B) If prob (A jb ) = prob (A), A and B are independent. Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 4 / 7

Conditional probability Exercises Problem Throw a dice. What is the conditional probability of, or 3 pips (spots) if the number of pips is odd. Problem If events A and B are independent what about the probability of A \ B? Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 5 / 7

Static Bayesian games First-price auction Simultaneous bids where the highest bidder obtains the object and pays his bid. Two bidders and who know their own willingness to pay (their type ). Sequence: Nature decides the players types. Every player learns his own type and can condition his bid on his own type. Static Bayesian games = all players act simultaneously after learning their own types. Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 6 / 7

De nitions Static Bayesian game example for extensive form N = f, g, T = t, t and T = t, t, A = fa, bg and A = fc, dg. At the initial node, nature chooses a type combination t = (t, t ) T T. jt j informations sets for player 0 ( t,t ) ( t,t ) ( t,t ) ( t,t ) a b a b a b c d c d c d c d c d c d a b d c d Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 7 / 7

De nitions Static Bayesian game De nition (Static Bayesian game) A static Bayesian game is a quintuple where Γ = N, (A i ) in, (T i ) in, τ, (u i ) in = (N, A, T, τ, u), N = f,..., ng is the player set, A i is the action set for player i N with Cartesian product A = in A i and elements a i and a, respectively, T = (T i ) in is the tuple of type sets T i for players i N, τ is the probability distribution on T, and u i : A T i! R is player i s payo function. Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 8 / 7

De nitions Beliefs Ex ante, before the players learn their own types, their beliefs are summarized by τ. The (a priori) probability for type t i is given by τ (t i ) := t i T i τ (t i, t i ). De nition (Belief) Let Γ be a static Bayesian game with probability distribution τ on T. Player i s ex-post (posterior) belief τ i is the probability distribution on T i given by the conditional probability τ i (t i ) := τ (t i jt i ) = τ (t i, t i ) τ (t i ) = τ (t i, t i ) t i T i τ (t i, t i ). () Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 9 / 7

De nitions Beliefs Problem Two bidders and with T = T = fhigh, lowg (willingness to pay) and Find τ (high, high) = 3, τ (high, low) = 3, τ (low, high) = 9, τ (low, low) = 9. τ (t = high) (ex ante) and τ (t = high) if player has learned that his own willingness to pay is high (ex post). Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 0 / 7

De nitions Actions, strategies, and equilibria De nition Let Γ be a static Bayesian game. A strategy for player i N is a function s i : T i! A i. We sometimes write s (t) instead of (s (t ),..., s n (t n )) A. A strategy combination s = (s, s,..., s n ) is a Bayesian equilibrium (ex post) if si (t i ) arg max a i A i τ i (t i ) u i (a i, s i (t i ), t i ) t i T i holds for all i N and all t i T i obeying τ (t i ) > 0. The quali cation τ (t i ) > 0 is necessary because τ i (t i ) is ill-de ned otherwise. τ (t i ) = 0 implies anything goes. Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics / 7

The Cournot model with one sided cost uncertainty The model Static Bayesian game Γ = (N, (A, A ), (T, T ), τ, (u, u )) with the set of two rms N = f, g, the action sets A = A = [0, ), the type sets T = c I, ch = f5, 5g, T = f0g, (c = 0 known to both, c known to, only) probability distribution τ on T given by τ (5, 0) = τ (5, 0) = inverse demand function given by p (X ) = 80 X and hence the payo functions u (x, x, t ) = (p (X ) c ) x = (80 (x + x ) 0) x and u (x, x, t ) = (80 (x + x ) 5) x, t = c l (80 (x + x ) 5) x, t = c h Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics / 7

The Cournot model with one sided cost uncertainty The model The types are independent (trivial). Ex-ante probabilities: τ (0) : = τ (5, 0) + τ (5, 0) = + =, τ (5) : = τ (5, 0) =, and τ (5) : = τ (5, 0) =. Ex-post probability for c = 0 (player s belief): τ (0) = τ (t, 0) τ (t ) = = = τ (0). Ex-post probability for c = 5 (player s belief): τ (5, 0) τ (5) = = τ (0) = = τ (5). Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 3 / 7

The Cournot model with one sided cost uncertainty The static Bayesian equilibrium Strategy sets: player : S = fs n : fc n g! o[0, )g to be o identi ed with A player : S = s : c I, ch! [0, ). Firm s choice depends on its type: s R (t ) = = arg maxx [0, ) 80 (x + x ) c l x, t = c l 65 55 arg max x [0, ) 80 (x + x ) c h x, t = c h x, t = c l x, t = c h Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 4 / 7

The Cournot model with one sided cost uncertainty The static Bayesian equilibrium Firm s pro t is the expected value i τ (5) 80 hx l + x i +τ (5) 80 hx h + x h i = 60 x l + x h x x which leads to the reaction function x R = s R (0) = 30 0 x 0 h i x l + x h. 4 Three equations in the three unknowns x, x l, and x h. They lead to the Nash equilibrium x = 0, s c l = 45, and s c h = 35. Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 5 / 7 x

Revisiting mixed-strategy equilibria Continuous types We assume two players i =, with types t i from T i = [0, x], x > 0. Types are independent. Density function: τ x (a) = x, a [0, x] 0, a / [0, x] /x Hence, for 0 a b x, τ x ([a, b]) = Z b a τ x (t) dt = b a. x 0 a b x t i The probability for a speci c type a is zero: τ x ([a, a]) = a a x = 0. Careful: Distinguish τ x ([a, a]) from τ x (a). Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 6 / 7

Revisiting mixed-strategy equilibria Introducing uncertainty Static Bayesian games allow a fresh look on mixed equilibria. For a given matrix game with a mixed-strategy equilibrium, we construct a sequence of static Bayesian games that converges towards that game. In every Bayesian game, no player i N randomizes. However, from the point of view of the other players from Nn fig who do not know the type t i, it may well seem as if player i is a randomizer. Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 7 / 7

Revisiting mixed-strategy equilibria Introducing uncertainty theatre Peter football Cathy theatre + t C, 0, 0 football 0, 0, + t P Three equilibria. t C = t P = 0. 3, 3, 3, 3 is the properly mixed one for Result (as shown in the manuscript): Cathy s probabilities in the static Bayesian games (which depend on x) converge towards her equilibrium mixed strategy as x goes towards 0. Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 8 / 7

The rst-price auction The model Two bidders and with types t, t [0, ]. Player s distribution is given by 0 a b t Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 9 / 7

The rst-price auction The model Formally, the rst-price auction is the static Bayesian game where Γ = (N, (A, A ), (T, T ), τ, (u, u )) N = f, g is the set of the two bidders, A = A = [0, ) are the sets of bids chosen by the bidders, T = T = [0, ] are the type sets, τ is the a probability distribution on T given by τ ([a, b], [c, d]) = (b a) (d c) where 0 a b and 0 c d hold, and Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 0 / 7

The rst-price auction The model the payo functions are de ned by 8 < u (a, t ) = u (a, t ) = : 8 < : t a, a > a, t a, a = a, 0, a < a, 0 a > a, t a a = a, t a a < a. and Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics / 7

The rst-price auction Solution In order to solve the rst-price auction, we use the ex-post equilibrium de nition. For example, if player is of type t [0, ], his condition for the equilibrium strategy combination (s, s ) is 0 s (t ) arg max a A B @ (t a ) τ (ft [0, ] : a > s (t )g) {z } probability that player s bid is higher than player s bid + (t a ) τ (ft [0, ] : a = s C (t )g) A. {z } probability for equal bids =0 Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics / 7

The rst-price auction Solution Following Gibbons (99, pp. 5), we restrict our search for equilibrium strategies to linear strategies of the forms By... (next slide) s (t ) = c + d t (d > 0), s (t ) = c + d t (d > 0). τ (ft [0, ] : a > c + d t g) = τ t [0, ] : t < a c d = τ 0, a c = a c, d d Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 3 / 7

The rst-price auction Solution player s maximization problem is solved by s R (t ) = arg max (t a ) a c = c + t. a A d Player s best response to c (and hence to player s strategy) is a linear strategy with c = c and d =. Analogously, bidder s best response is s R (t ) = c + t with c = c and d =. Now, c = c = c = c 4 implies c = 0. Equilibrium candidate: s : [0, ]! R +, t 7! s (t ) = t and s : [0, ]! R +, t 7! s (t ) = t Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 4 / 7

The rst-price auction Solution These strategies form an equilibrium because the strategies are best reponses to each other. If player uses the (linear) strategy s, s (t ) = t is a best response as shown above. Thus, s turns out to be a linear strategy. Therefore, we have found an equilibrium in linear strategies but cannot exclude the possibility of an equilibrium in non-linear strategies. Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 5 / 7

The rst-price auction First-price or second-price auction? We now take the auctioneer s perspective and ask the question whether the rst-price auction is preferable to the second-price auction. The auctioneer compares the prices min (t, t ) for the second-price auction and max t, t for the rst-price auction. We assume a risk-neutral auctioneer who maximizes the expected payo. It can be shown (see manuscript) that the auctioneer is indi erent between the rst-price and the second-price auction! Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 6 / 7

(a) Assume that both players are informed which game they play before they choose their actions. Formulate this game as a static Bayesian game! (b*) Assume that player learns whether they play G A or G B while player does not. Formulate this game as a static Bayesian game and determine all of its equilibria! Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 7 / 7 Further exercise Game G A with probability p >, game G B with probability L > M >. p. Assume G A left right up M, M, L G B left right up 0, 0, L down L, 0, 0 down L, M, M