Riga Centre of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, Latvia



Similar documents
Rehabilitation and MS-Centre Overpelt, Belgium

Groupe MGEN - Mutuelle Générale de l'education Nationale, France

German Mesothelioma Register

German Social Accident Insurance, DGUV, Germany

Entidade Reguladora da Saúde ERS (Portuguese Health Regulatory Authority), Portugal

Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé, France

EUCERD RECOMMENDATIONS QUALITY CRITERIA FOR CENTRES OF EXPERTISE FOR RARE DISEASES IN MEMBER STATES

Board of Member States ERN implementation strategies

THE ORGANISATION AND FINANCING OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN LATVIA

EPF Position Statement on the European Commission s proposal for a Regulation on In Vitro Medical Devices

Employment, Social policy, Health and Consumer affairs Council meeting Brussels, 1 December 2014

The EFPIA Disclosure Code: Your Questions Answered

Nursing Knowledge for Your Benefit

Training Criminal Justice Professionals in Harm Reduction Services for Vulnerable Groups

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Role of the consultant psychiatrist in psychotherapy

ehealth in support of safety, quality and continuity of care within and across borders

MEDICAL POLICY Treatment of Opioid Dependence

The European regulatory system for medicines and the European Medicines Agency

Acting Together: How to continue to provide high quality and universally accessible health services in a financially sustainable way in Europe.

EURORDIS Position Paper on Centres of Expertise and European Reference Networks for Rare Diseases

ENS4Care Questionnaire

EUROPEAN CITIZENS DIGITAL HEALTH LITERACY

HEALTHCARE AND TREATMENT SERVICES IN LATVIA November 7 8, 2012, London, Dublin

Dissemination of the results of projects funded under the EU Public Health Programme and funding opportunities IPH, Dublin, 13 October 2015

Estate Planning and Patients' Rights in Cross-Border Healthcare

Nurse Practitioner Led Services in Primary Health Care Two Case Studies Frances Barraclough Master of Philosophy (Medicine) USYD

Written Contribution of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds of

Submission Form: Consultation on the registered nurse scope of practice May 2009

Third EU Health Programme

MS-NEED: Multiple Sclerosis-Nurse Empowering Education

Latvian Early Intervention Concept development

American Society of Addiction Medicine

National Mental Health Commission Review of Mental Health Programs Australian Primary Health Care Nurses Association (APNA) April 2014

Visions for the hospital service in Region Zealand We create the hospital-service of the future through coherence and development

About public outpatient services

Specialist Module in Old Age Psychiatry

COURSE APPROVAL GUIDELINES APS COLLEGE OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGISTS

Appendix D. Behavioral Health Partnership. Adolescent/Adult Substance Abuse Guidelines

Dialogue between the Government and stakeholders a crucial factor for improving Business Environment

Systematic Reviews. knowledge to support evidence-informed health and social care

Dual Diagnosis: Models of Care and Local Pathways AGENDA. Part one: Part two:

Policy proposals to improve access to multiple sclerosis treatments in Europe

HEALTH PROFESSIONALS IN EUROPE: NEW ROLES, NEW SKILLS

Good Practice Guidance: The administration of medicines in domiciliary care

Self Care in New Zealand

Dual Diagnosis Clinician - Nurse - Counties Manukau DHB Focus Position Description

No. prev. doc.: 8770/08 SAN 64 Subject: EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL POLICY, HEALTH AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS COUNCIL MEETING ON 9 AND 10 JUNE 2008

Terms of Reference. All the activities mentioned below represent MoEPRD s, KRD s, OC s, ØC s and AAC s effective contribution to the project:

Community Mental Health Services (Provider Type 84)

Third EU Health Programme

Neurorehabilitation Strategy Briefing Document and Position Paper

Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England

Overview of the national laws on electronic health records in the EU Member States National Report for Lithuania

Submission to the Ministry of Health. On the Mental Health and Addiction Service Development Plan. Prepared by the New Zealand Psychological Society

Commissioning Policy (EMSCGP005V2) Defining the boundaries between NHS and Private Healthcare

BACHELOR OF HEALTH SCIENCES PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION AND REGULATIONS, FMS, UWI, CAVE HILL

EU DIRECTIVE ON GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS DH & MHRA BRIEFING NOTE

Mental Health Services Follow-up

Rehabilitation Medicine Programme

EQAVET Sectoral Seminar

Proof of Concept Project for a Diabetes Prevention Service in Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

Taking Part in Research at University Hospitals Birmingham

CONSENT FOR HEALTHCARE SERVICES OF A MINOR

Substance Abuse Treatment Services

DDCAT. The Dual Diagnosis Capability in Addiction Treatment (DDCAT) Index Toolkit. Adapted for use in the

Future hospital: Caring for medical patients. Extract: Recommendations

Consultation: Two proposals for registered nurse prescribing

LEVEL I SA: OUTPATIENT INDIVIDUAL THERAPY - Adult

The new EU Clinical Trials Regulation How NHS research and patients will benefit

Ass Professor Frances Kay-Lambkin. NHMRC Research Fellow, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre UNSW

Alcohol use disorders: sample chlordiazepoxide dosing regimens for use in managing alcohol withdrawal

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH ROLE PROFILE

3.0 Prequalification Process for Health Facility Design Consultants

E-health croatia: National healthcare information system

Transcription:

Riga Centre of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, Latvia 1.1 Please indicate the type of organisation on behalf of which you are responding to this consultation: Please indicate what type: 1. Respondent Profile Healthcare provider Hospital Please indicate for what the administration is responsible: 1.1.1. Other (please specify): Hospital including outpatient units 1.2 Please indicate the name of your organisation or centre: Riga Centre of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine 1.3 Please indicate the country where your organsation/centre is located/has its headquarters or main representative office in Europe: 1. Please indicate the number of EU Member States and EEA countries (rway, Iceland, Lichtenstein) and accessing country (Croatia) in which your organisation conducts business/is represented: 1. If need be, can we contact you by e-mail to obtain further information on your submission? 1..1 Please provide an e-mail address where we can contact you: rpnc@rpnc.lv; aigars.kisuro@rpnc.lv LV 1 1.6 Please provide us with a contact person (incl jobtitle and daytime phone number): aigars Kisuro, MD, psychiatrist, specialist on develpoment and treatment quality issues, +371 6708013;+371 2919766 1.7 Please provide additional contact details if needed: fax: +371 6722230

2. Involvement of your organisation in the matter of centres of excellence/reference (COE) and healthcare networks in highly specialised healthcare (HSHC). 2.1 How would you describe your organisation's knowledge of CoE and HSHC? 2.1.1 Space for further comments: 2.2. What aspects or domains related to the topic of CoE and HSHC would correspond to your organisation's key knowledge? (cross any that applies) High Highly specialised healthcare provision Priorities, description and characteristics of CoE and HSHC Management and organisational aspects of highly specialized healthcare Professional performance, clinical practice, quality and safety of specialized healthcare 2.2.1. Space for further comments: 2.3 Is highly specialised healthcare a priority in your organisation's strategies and work plans? 2.3.1 Space for further comments: 2.. What specific field of healthcare services/specialities are most relevant for your centre/organisation's field of work? High Other Please specify: 2.. Has your organisation/centre been directly involved in the design or assessment of professional standards and criteria related with highly specialised healthcare? Mental health; Reference toxicologic laboratory Occasionally 2..1 Please describe your role in such actions/projects: Providing support for Ministry of Health of Latvia and its supportive institutions during process of creating methodology and guidelines in Mental Health care

2.6. Has your organisation been involved in projects/activities supported by the Commission in relation with HSHC or professional and technical criteria/standards in highly specialised healthcare? 2.7. Do you have concrete examples based on your own organisation's experience or could you provide us with references or links to documents related with professional criteria and standards in highly specialised healthcare/coe or HSHC (e.g. quality criteria, guidelines, consensus documents)? 2.7.1 Space for further comments: Previously mentioned links can be provided in Latvian 2.8. Is your centre or unit directly involved in the management (diagnosis, treatment etc.) of highly specialised diseases or conditions? 2.9. Is your centre or unit designated or recognised as centre of reference/excellence in your country? 2.10. How has your centre been designated/recognised as centre of reference/excellence? Through a formal institutional process 2.10.1 Space for further comments: 2.11. Which is your area of expertice as centre of reference? (please provide your answer in free text) Single in country Addiction Medicine Unit with Department of Alcohol and Drugs Intoxication Test in the structure of Riga Centre of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine 2.12 Is your centre participating currently in a network of centres of expertise? 2.13. What is the scope of the network? 2.1. Which kind of network? 2.1.1 Space for further comments:

2.1. Would you be interested in applying to the process to be considered Centre of Excellence of the future European Reference Network? (1 = not interested at all, = very interested) 2.1.1 Space for further comments: 3. Proposed criteria for ERN (scope, general and specific criteria) 3.1 Criteria related with diseases or conditions in order to be considered under the scope of the ERN 3.1.1. Need of highly specialised healthcare 3.1.1.1. Complexity of the diagnosis and treatment 3.1.1.2. High cost of treatment and resources 3.1.1.3. Need of advanced/highly specialised medical equipment or infrastructures 3.1.2. Need of particular concentration of expertise and resources 3 3.1.2.1. Rare expertise/need of concentration of cases 3 3.1.2.2. Low prevalence/incidence/number of cases 3.1.2.3. Evaluated experiences of Member States 3 3.1.3. Based on high-quality, accessible and cost-effective healthcare 3.1.3.1. Evidence of the safety and favourable risk-benefit analysis

3.1.3.2. Feasibility and evidence of the value and potential positive outcome (clinical) 3.1.. Do you recommend any additional criteria or option that would effectively address the issue? 3.1.. Would you prioritise or suggest any concrete disesase or group of diseases to be addressed by the future ERN according to the above criteria? 3.2. General criteria of the centres wishing to join a European Reference Network 3.2.1. Organisation and management 3.2.2. Patients empowerment and centered care 3.2.3. Patient care, clinical tools and health technology assessment 3.2.. Quality, patient safety and evaluation framework policies 3.2.. Business continuity, contingency planning and response capacity 3.2.6. Information systems, technology and e-health tools and applications 3.2.7. Overall framework and capacity for research and training 3.2.8. Specific commitment of the management/direction of the centre/hospital to ensure a full and active participation in the ERN 3.2.9. Do you recommend any additional option that would effectively address the issue? 3.2.9.1. Space for further comments:

3.3. Specific criteria regarding the areas of expertise 3.3.1. Competence, experience and good outcomes and care 3.3.2. Specific resources and organisation: 3.3.2.1. Human resources 3.3.2.2. Team/centre organisation 3.3.2.3. Structural conditions 3.3.2.. Specific equipment 3 3.3.2.. Presence and coordination with other required complementary units or services 3.3.3. Patient care pathways, protocols and clinical guidelines in the field of expertise 3.3.. External coordination, care management and follow-up of patients 3.3.. Research, training, health technology assessment in the field of expertise 3.3.6. Specific information systems 3.3.7. Do you recommend any additional criteria or option that would effectively address the issue? 3.3.7.1. Space for further comments: comments at this stage