Assess Your 2011 Tax Situation By: Bart Peters. Kentucky Farm Business Management Program



Similar documents
Contents. Acknowledgements... iv. Source of Data...v

Immigration Reform Update By: Laura Powers. Kentucky Farm Business Management Program

Cash to Accrual Income Approximation

This article illustrated deferred tax liabilities for a cash crop farm in west central Indiana. The

How much financing will your farm business

Farm Business Analysis Report BEEF SUMMARY

Farm Financial Statements Net Worth Statement Statement of Cash Flows Net Income Statement Statement of Owner Equity

Factors Impacting Dairy Profitability: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Dairy Enterprise Data

Understanding USDA s Livestock Risk Protection Insurance Program for Feeder Cattle (AEC )

ProPartners Financial Application Cover Page Please fax to with application

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS ON KFMA FARMS

Enterprise Budgeting. By: Rod Sharp and Dennis Kaan Colorado State University

Calculating Your Milk Production Costs and Using the Results to Manage Your Expenses

Farm Accounting Using QuickBooks

Economic & Policy Update

Revenue and Costs for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Double-Crop Soybeans, Actual for 2009 through 2015, Projected 2016

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

LIVESTOCK GROSS MARGIN FOR DAIRY CATTLE INSURANCE POLICY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Two-Generation Farming

CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2015

Impact of Crop Insurance and Indemnity Payments on Cash Rent and Land Values. Michael Langemeier Center for Commercial Agriculture Purdue University

Cash Flow Budget: What Will It Tell Me? *

Tennessee Agricultural Production and Rural Infrastructure

Missouri Soybean Economic Impact Report

Financial Impacts from Farmland Value Declines by Various Farm Ownership Levels (AEC )

Costs to Produce Hogs in IllinoisC2007

AG FINANCIAL PLANNING PREPARED BY PAUL C HAY, EXTENSION EDUCATOR

Cost of Production. Cost of Production. Cost of Production!

MPP Decision Guide MPP Dairy Financial Stress test Calculator: A User s Guide

Livestock Budget Estimates for Kentucky

Setting up your Chart of Accounts

Evaluating Taking Prevented Planting Payments for Corn

Center for Commercial Agriculture

Managing Feed and Milk Price Risk: Futures Markets and Insurance Alternatives

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

Dairy Margin Protection Program of the 2014 Farm Bill

Understanding Loan Deficiency Payments (LDP), Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Loans and Telfarm Accounting Entries Revised March 2006

Outlook for the 2013 U.S. Farm Economy

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

Computerized Farm Records

Agricultural Commodity Marketing: Futures, Options, Insurance

Ohio State University Extension, 2120 Fyffe Road, Columbus, OH 43210

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

CROP REVENUE COVERAGE INSURANCE PROVIDES ADDITIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT WHEAT ALTERNATIVES 1

Kentucky ANR Agent Land Value and Cash Rent Survey AEC Greg Halich and Karen Pulliam

Financial Management: Cash vs. Accrual Accounting

Farm Tax Record Book SAMPLE

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS. Preparing a Projected Cash Flow Statement. Introduction. What Information Is Provided? EC-616-W

Preparing A Cash Flow Statement

Third Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. 13 August 2014

Working Capital: The Key in Volatile Times By Dr. David M. Kohl

TAX PLANNING FOR CANADIAN FARMERS

Eastern Kentucky Meat Goat Budget Analysis

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Dairy Margin Protection Program 2014 FARM BILL PROVIDES NEW RISK MANAGEMENT TOOL FOR DAIRY FARMERS

How Crop Insurance Works. The Basics

Livestock Gross Margin Insurance for Dairy Farms What is it? Do I need it? What will it cost? A guide for Ohio dairy producers.

U.S. Farm Policy: Overview and Farm Bill Update. Jason Hafemeister 12 June Office of the Chief Economist. Trade Bureau

How to Read a Farm's Balance Sheet

Using Enterprise Budgets in Farm Financial Planning

Crop-Share and Cash Rent Lease Comparisons Version 1.6. Introduction

Methods of Supporting Farm Prices and Income

How To Compare The Pros And Cons Of A Combine To A Lease Or Buy

Craig Thomas MSU-Extension Educator Dairy Farm Business Management and Milk Marketing

Introductory Pricing/Marketing Workshop for Grains, On-Line

Who Will Retire Member s Equity? Roger G. Ginder Department of Economics Iowa State University

Third Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. 21 August 2015

EU Milk Margin Estimate up to 2014

Section II: Problem Solving (200 points) KEY

AGRICULTURAL LOAN APPLICATION

New England Cash Receipts 2012

Farm Credit s Mission to serve Young, Beginning, and Small Farmers. New loans made in 2010 to: Young: $7.3 billion Beginning: $10.

Will ARC Allow Farmers to Cancel Their 2014 Crop Insurance (Updated)? 1

Chapter 4: Business Planning & Financials What Attitude Can Do for Aptitude

THE LOAN RENEWAL SEASON: YOUR LENDER S CONCERNS. Michael Boehlje Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University

Breakeven Analysis. Takes the user to the data input worksheet of the tool.

SELF-EMPLOYED HOUSEHOLDS Section 104 Page 1

298,320 3, ,825. Missouri Economic Research Brief FARM AND AGRIBUSINESS. Employment. Number of Agribusinesses.

Using the Futures Market to Predict Prices and Calculate Breakevens for Feeder Cattle Kenny Burdine 1 and Greg Halich 2

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES

Farm Record Keeping and Financial Analysis

How To Write A Business Plan

AGRICULTURE CREDIT CORPORATION CASH WHEN YOU NEED IT MOST

New Era Marketing 2015

Estimation of Deferred Taxes

Common Crop Insurance Policy (CCIP) DR. G. A. ART BARNABY, JR. Kansas State University 4B Agricultural Consultants

History of Farm Accounting

Basics of accounting Documentation basics Choosing an accounting system Common tax issues Get an advisor!!!

Characterization of the Beef Cow-calf Enterprise of the Northern Great Plains

FUTURES TRADERS GUIDE TO THE WASDE

First Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. 20 February 2015

Ethanol Usage Projections & Corn Balance Sheet (mil. bu.)

Measuring and Analyzing Farm Financial Performance

Assessing and Improving Farm Profitability

University of Illinois CROP BUDGETS. Consumer Economics

Using Enterprise Budgets To Make Decisions about Your Farm Richar d Carkner

The Supplementary Insurance Coverage Option: A New Risk Management Tool for Wyoming Producers

General Information Series

Tax Considerations of Farm Transfers (Revised 9 January 2013)

Transcription:

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, LEXINGTON, KY, 40546 Agricultural Economics - Extension No. xxx KENTUCKY FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM STATE NEWSLETTER Vol. 15, No. 1 2850-B Pembroke Road, Hopkinsville, Kentucky 42240 November 10, 2011 Inside: Assess Your 2011 Tax Situation...1 2010 Dairy Enterprise Results...2 Welcome Amanda...4 Upcoming KFBM Events...4 Kentucky Farm Business Management Program Lincoln Trail Association Jonathan Shepherd Amanda Jenkins 270-737-4799 Ohio Valley Association Lauren Omer 270-827-1395 Suzy Martin 270-685-8480 Purchase Association Jennifer Rogers 270-562-2022 Pennyroyal Association Rush Midkiff 270-842-5823 Evan Conrad Michael Forsythe Bart Peters 270-886-5281 Program Coordinator Jerry Pierce 859-537-6655 Extension Coordinator Tim Woods 859-257-7276 Assess Your 2011 Tax Situation By: Bart Peters Fall Harvest is complete and cash grain prices have been at record highs. The euphoria of selling $7.00 corn on the heels of selling a great wheat crop at high prices could lead to a massive income tax bill this coming winter. Farmers planning on selling grain this fall at record prices should take a moment to review their taxable income and determine if they should be postponing sales until 2012. Managing the income tax situation will be very important this year and the following are some strategies to consider. Bonus Depreciation. Under federal tax law, producers can take a 100% bonus depreciation deduction for NEW equipment and buildings up to a 20 year life. Under bonus depreciation rules, any item traded in on the acquisition of a new piece of equipment is also eligible for the bonus depreciation if the traded item has a remaining cost basis. Bonus depreciation also allows the producer an immediate write-off for capital investments such as tobacco barns, shops, and storage buildings, which are not eligible under the Section 179 election. There is no dollar limit to the amount of property that bonus depreciation can be used for. The deduction is scheduled to be reduced back to 50% for 2012. Kentucky tax law does not allow for bonus depreciation. 1

Section 179 Expense Election. Another generous tax item is the expense election of up to $500,000 of new and used equipment. If the amount of qualifying property is over $2 million, your election amount will phase out on a dollar-for-dollar basis. If an owned item is traded-in, only the cash trade difference counts towards the expense election and phase out amount, not the total value of the purchased item. This deduction is scheduled to revert back to a maximum of $125,000 in 2012. Kentucky tax law only allows for $25,000 with a $200,000 phase out. The Kentucky limits can result in a much higher than expected KY tax bill. However, these items are depreciated over time and will eventually result in lower KY tax liabilities. Prepayment of 2012 expenses. Prices for dry fertilizer and liquid nitrogen are running about 50% higher than last year. With wheat prices remaining high and providing an incentive to grow more acres, it will not be hard to spend a substantial amount of money for the 2012 crop this fall. Producers should be diligent in pricing these inputs as these markets have been volatile as well. Seed companies will also offer several early discounts that producers should take advantage of this fall. The IRS limits prepay deductions to 50% of all other farm expenses during the tax year in which the expenses are prepaid. Producers must purchase specific items and quantities rather than simply making a pre-pay deposit. Important reminder. Selling your grain or other products and having the company hold your check until the next year is NOT an acceptable practice. The IRS calls this constructive receipt and can count this as 2011 income unless you have a contract stating you cannot receive the money until next year. Make sure your contracts specify a pay date. Also be aware of this if you have grain on storage at a commercial facility. Kentucky grain farmers are going to have a successful year in 2011. Good years require more careful tax planning and this is the time to start thinking about managing that tax burden. 2010 Dairy Enterprise Results By: Rush Midkiff & Lauren Omer Enterprise studies were conducted on 29 farms in the Kentucky Farm Business Management (KFBM) program. In studying the data, it is evident that the size of Kentucky dairies has increased over the past couple of decades. In 2010, the average herd in the study had 191 cows compared to 147 cows in the 2008 study. In 1999, 28 farms were evaluated and the average herd had 132 cows. In 1996, the study contained 37 farms and had an average herd size of 118 cows. In 1981, 58 enterprises were studied that had an average of 93 cows per herd. # of Head 250 200 150 100 50 0 Milk Production and Herd Size 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Milk Production (Lbs milk/cow) Herd Size 20,000 19,500 19,000 18,500 18,000 17,500 17,000 16,500 16,000 This enterprise analysis study examines the economic and production variables of Kentucky dairies. In comparing the 2010 farms against the 50 farms in the 2008 dairy enterprise analysis study, it is evident that the dairy industry in Kentucky has experienced changes in the past two years. Average herd size increased from 147 to 191 cows per farm. Total dairy farm returns for 2010 were $449 per cow less than in 2008. The price of milk accounted for most of this 2

decrease in returns. In 2008, the price of milk was $21.10 per cwt. In 2010, the price of milk was $19.05 per cwt. Milk per cow dropped from 18,467 pounds in 2008 to 18,163 pounds in 2010. However, total milk production per farm increased 28% from 2008 levels to 34,780 cwt. Although total dairy returns were lower in 2010, the total costs were also lower. The total non-feed costs dropped from $2,354 per cow in 2008 to $1,797 per cow in 2010. That was a decrease of $557 per cow. This confirms that Kentucky dairies learned how to cut costs and continue operation. Feed costs dropped $39 per cow from 2008. Management Returns per cow were slightly improved with returns at -$118 in 2010, compared to -$265 in 2008. Table 2. Size Comparisons-Economic and Production Variables Size Comparisons-Economic and Production Variables <100 100-200 >200 Average Number of Herds Units 11 9 9 29 Total Dairy Returns $ 3,580 3,449 3,907 3,755 Total Feed Costs $ 2,125 1,899 2,129 2,076 Returns Above Feed $ 1,455 1,550 1,777 1,679 Total Non-Feed Costs $ 2,344 1,834 1,658 1,797 Management Returns Over All Costs $ -889-284 120-118 Other Economic Variables Returns/$100 Feed Fed $ 168 182 183 181 Price Received/CWT of Milk $ 18.45 18.26 19.44 19.05 Other Production Variables Average Number of Cows Cows 73 140 388 191 Total Milk Production CWT 12,498 24,289 72,504 34,780 Milk/Cow Lbs. 17,163 17,322 18,697 18,163 Value of Feed Fed/CWT M.E. $ 12.38 10.96 11.39 11.43 3 Table 1. Averages for Economic and Production Variables Units 2008 2010 Number of Herds Herds 50 29 Total Dairy Returns $ 4,204 3,755 Total Feed Costs $ 2,115 2,076 Returns Above Feed $ 2,089 1,679 Total Non-Feed Costs $ 2,354 1,797 Management Returns Over All Costs $ -265-118 Other Economic Variables Returns/$100 Feed Fed $ 199 181 Price Received/CWT of Milk $ 21.10 19.05 Other Production Variables Averages for Economic and Production Variables Average Number of Cows Cows 147 191 Total Milk Production CWT 27,125 34,780 Milk/Cow Lbs. 18,467 18,163 Value of Feed Fed/CWT M.E. $ 10.73 11.43 Table 2 looks at size comparisons with economic and production variables between the herd sizes. Total dairy returns increased from $3,580 per cow for the smaller dairies to $3,907 for the dairies over 200 cows. However, the mid-sized group had total dairy returns of only $3,449 per cow. Although the returns for the mid-sized group were the lowest, this group experienced a lower total cost of production than the small group, and thus higher management returns over all costs. The total non-feed costs varied drastically across the different herd sizes, ranging from $2,344 per cow for the small dairies to $1,658 per cow for the large dairies. The non-cash costs incurred by the dairies, such as unpaid labor and depreciation, are spread across fewer cows for the smaller dairies and thus have a larger impact on the bottom line. When looking at the costs and returns of the different size groups of dairies, the advantages of the larger dairies are obvious. Management Returns per cow were over $1,000 higher for the large dairies compared to the small dairies. Management Returns for the dairies with 100 cows or less were -$889 per cow. Dairies with 100 to 199 cows had Management Returns per cow of -$284. Management Returns for dairies having more than 200 cows were $120 per cow. In studying data on costs and returns, it becomes apparent that the larger dairies have captured some economies of scale and are separating themselves from the smaller dairies with cost efficiencies. The larger dairies are receiving slightly better production per cow and a slightly better price for their milk. When all of these factors are combined, it is evident that the larger dairies are positioning themselves to be more profitable in the future. For more information, see the complete 2010 Dairy Enterprise Study on our website http://www.uky.edu/ag/kfbm/pubs.php.

University of Kentucky Pennyroyal Farm Analysis Group 2850 B Pembroke Rd. Hopkinsville, KY 42240-6802 Return Service Requested PRESORTED STANDARD US POSTAGE PAID PERMIT 58 Hopkinsville, KY 42240 Welcome Amanda Jenkins Amanda Jenkins was hired as an Area Farm Management Specialist serving the Lincoln Trail Farm Analysis Group, Inc. on May 23, 2011. Amanda is originally from Clarksville, Tennessee where her family owns a Feed Mill operation. Amanda received her Bachelor s degree in Agricultural Business from Murray State University and her Master s Degree in Agricultural Economics from the University of Tennessee. Before becoming part of the KFBM staff, Amanda was working for NASS and based in Michigan. After a somewhat lengthy search, the Lincoln Trail Association is very happy to welcome Amanda. Upcoming KFBM Events: Nov. 21 st - Purchase Farm Analysis Group Nov. 28 th Pennyroyal Farm Analysis Group Nov. 29 th Ohio Valley Farm Analysis Group Dec. 6 th - Owensboro Area Lenders Conference Dec. 7 th - Purchase Area Lenders Conference Dec. 14 th Lincoln Trail Farm Analysis Group Dec. 20 th State Association Board of Director s Meeting - Lexington Please start gathering information and preparing for Check-In. University of Kentucky Department of Agricultural Economics 400 Charles E. Barnhart Bldg. Lexington, KY 40546-0276 Phone: 859-257-5762 Fax: 859-323-1913 http://www.ca.uky.edu/agecon/ 4

Kentucky Farm Business Management Program Celebrates 50 Years Ohio Valley Farm Analysis Group, Inc. 50 th Year Celebration By: Suzy Martin In 1962, the average corn yield in the Ohio Valley was 76 bushels per acre, soybean yield was 29 bushels per acre, and the average return to management was $5,218 per farm. In that same year, Agriculture Extension Agents in Henderson, Union, and Daviess counties along with faculty members from the Agricultural Economics Department at the University of Kentucky, worked to form what is known today as the Ohio Valley Farm Analysis Group, Inc. Original membership to the group consisted of 80 forwardthinking farmers who were willing to open their books to their farm analysis field man. The cost to participate in the program back then was $100 per farm. It is interesting to see how the farming operations in the area have transformed over the fifty-year period. Sole proprietorships have changed to partnerships and corporations. In 1962, the average farm size was 530 tillable acres compared to 1,865 tillable acres in 2010. Many farming operations have diversified from the primary grain crops to raise tobacco and poultry as well. As grain prices have increased, hog and beef enterprises have dwindled and are now very limited in number. Fifty years later, corn yields averaged 135 bushels per acre, soybean yields were 40 bushels per acre and the average returns to management were $134,872. Over the years, the farm analysis program has expanded to include three other groups working with farm families from Lexington to Paducah. The Ohio Valley Farm Analysis Group, Inc., which covers the counties of Daviess, Hancock, Henderson, Hopkins, McLean, Ohio, Union, and Webster, is holding steady at 74 members covered by two specialists. Today, the average dues per farming operation are $1,300. The basic goals of the program have not changed much over the years. Good recordkeeping is the number one focus. Although good records will not guarantee success, they are a key component for sound management decisions. The completed records give farmers detailed information about costs and returns based on their own data. The data can be evaluated based on one year, over multiple year trends, or it can even be used to compare operations of similar size and type. A day of events has been planned for Tuesday, November 29 to celebrate the 50 th Anniversary of the Ohio Valley Farm Analysis Group, Inc. Starting at 1:00 pm at the Daviess County Extension Office in Owensboro, there will be specialists from the University of Kentucky to present educational materials. These include Cory Walters, Grain Market Update; Kenny Burdine, Livestock Market Update; Greg Halich, 2012 Crop Budgets and Cash Rent Analysis; and Jennifer Hunter, Estate Planning Basics. We encourage anyone to attend, even if not currently a farm analysis cooperator. At 6:00 pm there will be a meeting for farm analysis members at Moonlite Bar-B-Q in Owensboro. Brent Gloy, Associate Professor in Agricultural Economics and Director for the Center for Commercial Agriculture from Purdue University will be the featured speaker. Also, farmer participants will be recognized for their 50 years of support to the farm analysis program and the University of Kentucky.