Business Operations Leadership Team (BOLT)



Similar documents
JULY 1, 2010 JUNE 30, 2013 STRATEGIC PLAN

American Association Of Chairs of Departments Of Psychiatry (AACDP) Constitution

The University of Texas at San Antonio. Business Affairs 2016 STRATEGIC PLAN December 2007

BUDGET ADMINISTRATOR JOB DESCRIPTION

Strategic Planning Procedure Manual

Pima Community College District. Vice Chancellor of Human Resources

Proposed UNTHSC School of Public Health. Faculty Bylaws. May 4, 2012

Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA PREAMBLE

2) Marshal and leverage available resources (financial or other) to help advance the unit s and University s mission.

Performance Management Review Process Draft for Management Consultation Review

Component 4: Organizational Leadership & Governance

The University of Tennessee IT Governance Process (Restructured)

MeadWestvaco Corporation

Translating Our Goals into Action Southeastern Illinois College Strategic Plan

Honorary Degree Guidelines. University of Illinois at Chicago Honorary Degree Guidelines October 26, 2005

Advisory Council member responsibilities include:

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES (as amended and restated as of February 23, 2015)

IT Governance. Brandeis University Library & Technology Services. Committees... 2 One steering committee and three subcommittees are created.

Guidebook for Establishing Diversity and Inclusion Employee Resource Groups

COHERENT, INC. Board of Directors. Governance Guidelines

U.S. Department of Education. Office of the Chief Information Officer

DTCC RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER

Project Manager Job Descriptions

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)

Scientific Cores/Service Centers Administrative Manual. Responsible Office: Associate Provost for Research. Introduction

Information Technology Strategic Plan

[BEAUMONT HEALTH PHYSICIAN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY] Beaumont Health Physician Leadership Academy

Governance Guideline SEPTEMBER 2013 BC CREDIT UNIONS.

School of Accounting Florida International University Strategic Plan

GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards

Rice University Task Force on Information Technology. Report on IT Principles, Governance & Organization

South East Water Corporation Finance Audit and Risk Management Committee Charter. October 2012

Human Resources Service Delivery Initiative Findings and Recommendations. Campus Update. November 2014

Delphi Automotive PLC. Corporate Governance Guidelines

For discussion only. HR_design_plan_presentation_powerpoint_ _AC_meeting.pptx

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS: ESTABLISHMENT, ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE, FACULTY APPOINTMENTS AND PROCESSES THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO

Division of Human Resources. Strategic Plan For a Culture of Excellence

Graduate Faculty Constitution

Graduate School Strategic Plan

Academic Division Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

Appendix D: Faculty Evaluation Form Second/Third Year Appointments

East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Demand Side Management and Renewable Energy Collaborative Charter. Introduction

Corporate Governance Principles. February 23, 2015

University Policy Statement UPS RECRUITMENT AND APPOINTMENT OF TENURE-TRACK FACULTY

Strategic Planning as an Iterative and Integrated Process NACUBO Conference

GUIDELINES AS TO THE ROLE, ORGANIZATION AND GOVERNANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Executive Summary... 3 Preamble... 4 Mission... 5 Vision... 5 Values... 5 Research... 6 Education... 8 Community and Clinical Partnerships...

KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENT June 20, 2011

I. Purpose - 1 MD # 0005

Dean of the College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

Corporate Governance Principles and Policies

DEAN OF THE SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES

KINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC (the "Company") CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The University of Texas at Austin BYLAWS OF THE GRADUATE STUDENT ASSEMBLY. ARTICLE I Objectives

Self-Study Town Hall Session. Working Group #2 Research, Scholarship and Entrepreneurship

Human Relations Advisory Council Operating Charter

DRAFT (February 7, 2000) Bert Garza. Faculty and Office for Computing and Information Science: Administrative and Management Structure

AVON PRODUCTS, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES. As amended by the Board of Directors as of December 9, 2013

Financial Management Framework >> Overview Diagram

EMC CORPORATION. Corporate Governance Guidelines

Enterprise Education Mission, Vision and Strategy

USBC Onboarding Program. Module 2: Orientation to the USBC Board of Directors

JASON INDUSTRIES, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Texas Tech University Human Resources. Strategic Plan. January 1, December 31, 2016

HRS Strategic Plan

IMMUNOGEN, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Advantages of a Technology Governance

Bylaws. Article 1- Purpose. Article II Membership. Article III Board of Directors

College of Business Faculty Charter. Code of Operating Standards for Academic Policy and Administrative Structure

Community Policing. Defined

Corporate Governance Framework June 2015

Welcome to the Creating Strategic Partnerships: Faculty Affairs Offices and Human Resources Webinar

UWG Vision Statement: UWG aspires to be the best comprehensive university in America sought after as the best place to work, learn and succeed!

NAIT Guidelines. Implementation Date: February 15, 2011 Replaces: July 1, Table of Contents. Section Description Page

University of Michigan Medical School Data Governance Council Charter

Statement of Values and Code of Ethics for Nonprofit and Philanthropic Organizations

Corporate Governance Guidelines Altria Group, Inc.

James Madison University. Best Practices for Online Programs

ALACER GOLD CORP. ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, SAFETY & SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference. Dated September 10, 2013

Proposal for College of the Arts

THE BYLAWS OF THE HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI, INC. A Nonprofit Corporation Proposed

DENVER WATER STRATEGIC PLAN

SET UP TOOL #4: PROJECT TEAM COMPOSITION. Core Team

Community-Based Program Review at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Trudy W. Banta

UTech Services Compliance, Auditing, Risk, and Security (CARS) Team Charter

Dean for Natural and Applied Sciences

Information Technology Services Strategic Plan. Values and Foundational Principles

University of Rhode Island IT Governance

CHAPTER FOUR: MINISTRY POLICING STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS

The Kimmel School fulfills the academic missions of teaching (learning), scholarship (discovery), and service (engagement) by:

RESEARCH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA STRATEGIC PLAN 2011 CONTINUED AND MEASURABLE SUCCESS

CONSTITUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF GRADUATE STUDENTS. California State University, Chico Chico, California 95929

How To Become Director Of Development At Northeastern

Libraries and Educational Technologies Professional & Performance Development Form Library Faculty Self Evaluation

Superintendent Effectiveness Rubric*

TIM HORTONS INC. Board of Directors Governance Guidelines Adopted September 28, 2009 (Most Recently Revised: August 7, 2013) BOARD STRUCTURE

Policy Abstract. for the. Handbook for Program Review: Cleveland State University s Self-Study Process for Growth and Change Spring 2005

Ithaca College Web Policy

ADOBE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Transcription:

Business Operations Leadership Team (BOLT) Charter Partnership Document Guiding Principles 4/23/2011 [Document includes the BOLT Charter, a statement of the importance of partnering with process owners and structure for accomplishing this, and a set of guiding principles to create a positive cultural change throughout the business operations community.]

BUSINESS OPERATIONS LEADERSHIP TEAM (BOLT) CHARTER BACKGROUND AND HISTORY In April 2007, the Vice President (VP) for Finance and Administration created the Business Operations organization. That action: Established a formal direct reporting relationship between all lead department administrators and the Vice President for Finance and Administration in addition to their reporting relationship with their dean, director or chair Created the position of Assistant Vice President (AVP) for Business Operations Formed the Business Operations Leadership Team (BOLT) The AVP for Business Operations was given responsibility for: Improving the quality of financial and administrative services for faculty, students and staff across all academic and administrative departments, schools and units at Yale University Ensuring that department and central business support staff work as a team, i.e., full partners Identifying common and unique needs and then designing and implementing policies, procedures and tools to meet those needs Assuring that appropriate internal controls are in place Building a community of business professionals at Yale The Business Operations Leadership Team (BOLT) was chartered to: Ensure that consistent high quality financial and administrative support is provided to faculty, students and staff of Yale University at the unit level on behalf of the VP for Finance & Business Operations. Serve as the key point of connection between operating and central financial and administrative units to continually improve services provided in support of the missions of Yale University. In the fall of 2009, Business Operations experienced staffing changes that led to a restructuring of unit responsibilities within the BOLT. These staffing changes and the experience gained over the past three years prompted a review of the original BOLT charter. The revision that follows incorporates what has been learned. 2.

I. Name. The name of the group created by this charter is the Business Operations Leadership Team (BOLT). II. Members. The members of the BOLT are named as follows: a. Associate Dean, Finance and Administration and Chief Administrative Officer, School of Management b. Associate Dean, Finance, School of Medicine c. Assistant Vice President, Business Operations d. Associate Dean, Finance and Administration, School of Law e. Senior Director, Business Operations f. Senior Director, Business Operations, FAS and Academic Services g. Senior Director, Business Operations, Professional Schools and Academic Support h. Senior Operations Manager III. IV. Chair. The BOLT shall be chaired by the Assistant Vice President, Business Operations. Number and Tenure. Membership may be modified at any time at the sole discretion of the Sponsor. V. Purpose. BOLT is organized to support the teaching, research, and clinical missions of Yale by ensuring that all faculty, students, and staff consistently receive high quality financial and administrative support in a manner compliant with Yale University policies and procedures. VI. Accountability. The BOLT shall be accountable for and shall have the authority to deliver results in the following areas: a. Strategy. Strategy and goal-setting for Business Operations including: i. developing annual and multi-year goals to improve the quality of financial and administrative support at the Unit level ii. defining key desired outcomes, diagnostic metrics, and approaches for improving the quality of financial and administrative support b. Business Operations Leadership. Providing leadership for the business operations community including: 3.

i. defining and convening a meeting structure that effectively informs and supports the missions of the business operations community ii. assuming responsibility for communications and acting as the primary voice and the primary sounding board of the business operations community thereby assuring: 1. relevant and timely communication between the business operations community and Yale University leaders 2. sustained alignment with key stakeholders, including Sponsor, central process owners, Provosts, Officers and program Leaders iii. leading initiatives to improve the quality of financial and administrative support including identifying, developing and propagating best practices across all units c. Financial Management. Assuring excellent financial management and strong financial controls including budget preparation, monitoring, and analysis that effectively supports the requirements of the operating units and Yale University as a whole d. Risk Management. Ensuring that a robust internal control environment is in place and provides reasonable assurance of appropriate use of assets and adherence to contracts, agreements and regulatory requirements e. Liaison. Fostering and fortifying the connection between departmental business offices and those who provide services centrally to assure identification and implementation of changes which improve services to the faculty, students and staff i. establish collaborative, joint problem-solving partnerships ii. determine clear service level expectations, decision rights, and escalation mechanisms f. Talent Management. Assuring that there is an adequate supply of financial and administrative talent available to meet the foreseeable needs of Yale University. VII. Operating Philosophy. The BOLT shall demonstrate and foster value-based leadership in Business Operations. The BOLT shall operate in a manner that models the values and approaches expected of the operating units. The BOLT shall: a. Demonstrate honesty, mutual respect, results orientation, and transparency b. Act with courage and integrity as university citizens and aspire to create solutions that are in the best interests of Yale c. Take action based on facts and data d. Think creatively and remain open to all ideas 4.

e. Be mindful of the impact that institutional decisions may have on the unique nature of Yale s programs; acknowledge and honor Yale s mission of teaching, research, and clinical care. VIII. Procedure. The BOLT may adopt its own rules of procedure, which shall be consistent with this Charter. The Sponsor hereby executes this Charter: Dated day of, 20. Finance and Business Operations, Yale University Shauna R. King Vice President for Finance and Business Operations 5.

Statement on Importance of Partnership between Business Operations Leadership Team and Central Process Owners Yale University has more than 100 business offices supporting the day to day administration of schools, colleges, academic departments, non-academic offices, libraries, and museums. As the strategic advisor to the leaders of these units, and direct point of contact with faculty and students, the business offices have broad responsibility for the stewardship of unit resources; financial, human, physical, and information. The management of these resources and delivery of the associated administrative services was varied, prompting the creation of direct reporting relationships in 2007 to the Vice President for Finance and Administration. This was done to improve the consistency and compliance of administrative services. The Business Operations Leadership Team (BOLT) was formed to manage this large, diverse group of business offices and serve as the collective voice and leader of the business community. The Collective Voice for Business Offices across Campus At the time BOLT was formed in April, 2007, Shauna King said BOLT is responsible for improving the quality of financial and administrative services for faculty, students, and units at Yale University. In reality, BOLT is just one side of a partnership with the Central Process Owners that works to improve financial and administrative services. The Central Process Owners have valuable knowledge about best practices and compliance issues for their area of expertise and often have access to resources, information, and efficiencies that are impossible to possess at the department level. BOLT, as the collective voice for the business offices across campus, has deep knowledge of Yale s day to day business and provides the connection between each unit s academic and service missions and Yale s resources. Improvements to Yale s administrative services for faculty, students, and staff are best achieved when both groups contribute towards solutions and improvements. Each has unique knowledge to share and a unique role in the management of resources and service delivery process. Therefore, the BOLT/Business Offices and the Central Process Owners are both essential partners in the delivery of quality administrative services. A Bridge between Department Business Offices and Process Owners The BOLT Charter describes BOLT s role as acting as a bridge between the department business offices and central process owners. Over the last three years much of BOLT s effort has gone into defining the reporting and communication structures between BOLT and business offices that enable BOLT to serve as an effective leader of the business community. The next step in this progression will be to strengthen the partnership with the central process owners (CPOs) and define those relationships with the same clarity as the BOLT/Business Office relationships. Partnerships are relatively strong with some CPOs, but undefined and weaker with many others. For BOLT to be most effective in its role as a bridge, stable foundations must be built on the CPO base, as well as the Business Office base. 6.

Bolt proposes the following partnership structure in order to strengthen the relationship of the CPOs and BOLT and improve our alignment in making Yale a leader in the delivery of high quality administrative services to faculty, students, and staff. Structure of the Partnership A list of proposed Partners can be found in the table on the next page. In addition, key partnerships have been identified based on the substantial day to day impact that these BOLT Partners and Business Offices have on each other s work. There may be changes over time, as our work changes. The partnerships will have three connection levels. 1. BOLT Liaisons All Partners will have an identified BOLT member acting as their liaison to BOLT. Liaisons should have routine conversations with Partners to ensure that BOLT and the Central Process Owners are keeping each other informed of each group s activities and potential plans. These partnerships will be developed and defined on an individual basis. This interaction may take the form of one or two phone calls each month, or it may mean regular attendance of the BOLT liaison at a CPO staff meeting. 2. Key Partners should attend BOLT meetings periodically to update BOLT, and for BOLT to update them, on important plans and ideas for improvement. Other Partners should attend BOLT only on an as needed basis. 3. BOLT will host a BOLT Key Partners meeting during the year to provide a forum for hearing and sharing ideas, plans, and initiatives with other offices across campus. All Key Partners will be invited to each meeting. Other Partners will be invited as needed. BOLT will be responsible for setting the agenda in consultation with all of its Partners. 7.

Partnership Responsibilities The administrative environment runs most efficiently, with less controversy and resistance, when information is shared and discussed openly. BOLT and the CPOs have a responsibility to share planning information, consult before acting, with the ultimate goal being to never surprise each other. Both have individual responsibilities as well. BOLT s role and responsibility is to be the collective voice of, and provide leadership of the University business offices. BOLT will provide Partners with timely and accurate advice from the business office community. BOLT will quickly identify representatives from business offices to provide representative advice and feedback on initiatives and policy decisions. BOLT has the authority to make campus-wide business policy and process decisions on behalf of the business offices. BOLT has a responsibility to make these decisions in a timely manner, and once made, to stick to the decision and manage the expectation and outcomes in the University business offices. Partner s role and responsibility is to inform BOLT early of proposed process changes or initiatives that will impact the business community, or require the support of the business community. BOLT Partners The following lists the BOLT Liaison and corresponding partner as of 4/4/2011. Office Partner Bolt Liaison Compensation and Benefits Hugh Penney Jack Beecher Controller s Office Cary Scapillato Brent Dickman Employee Relations and Staffing Donna Cable Julie Grant Financial Planning Steve Murphy Julie Grant Information Technology Phil Long Diane Palmeri Labor Relations Donna Cable Julie Grant Procurement John Mayes TBD Research Administration Andy Rudzynski Carrie Capezzone Student Financial & Admin Services Ernie Huff Brian Rebeschi 8.

BOLT Guiding Principles and Behaviors for a New Culture The Business Operations Leadership Team (BOLT) developed the following guiding principles and behaviors to create a positive change in the culture throughout Business Operations. By working with its partners in these new ways, BOLT models the culture it endorses for all of Business Operations. Its members will: Recognize that BOLT s core purpose is to support the University s mission to advance, disseminate, and preserve knowledge through its teaching, research, and clinical activities. The Business Operations structure exists to improve the ability of our faculty, students, and staff to attain that mission. Exhibit the courage, discipline and commitment to do the right thing in the University s best interest and acknowledge, recognize, and support those who demonstrate this value. Bear full responsibility for its decisions, including those made by groups or individuals authorized on its behalf; BOLT will provide the business rationale for its decisions. Make decisions in a collaborative manner. We seek input from our colleagues in other units and keep them informed about our decisions. BOLT always models the process we prefer our colleagues use when making their decisions. Assume our colleagues have a positive intent and will act in good faith. Build trust by sharing information with our colleagues so they can align their efforts to achieve our organizational goals. Acknowledge and embrace the reality that multiple operating models exist at the University rather than behave as if there was only one. These guiding principles and behaviors are in alignment with leadership principles developed by other groups across the University and promoted through programs, like Managing at Yale. 9.