4 th & Carey Groundwater. Remediation Project and Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System



Similar documents
Membrane Filtration Technology: Meeting Today s Water Treatment Challenges

Innovation and Progress in Water Treatment Technology

HUBER Vacuum Rotation Membrane VRM Bioreactor

SEAR Wastewater Treatment: Contaminant Removal and Material Recovery

By: Curt Roth Vice President, Engineering EconoPure Water Systems, LLC. Point of Use/Point of Entry Treatment with LFNano. An EconoPure White Paper

ECOAZUR BLUEWATER WATER PURIFICATION PLANTS

CHAPTER 7: REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

Reuse of Alternative Water Sources for Cooling Tower Systems Two Case Studies Using Non-Traditional Water Sources

Water Treatment and Reverse Osmosis Systems

James City Service Authority Five Forks Water Treatment Facility

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY TREATING OILY WASTEWATER FOR REUSE

COST AND PERFORMANCE REPORT

Basics of Reverse Osmosis

Water Pollution. A Presentation for Café Scientifique Cherie L. Geiger, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry, UCF

SANTA FE COUNTY'S OIL DEVELOPMENT ZONING ORDINANCE

How To Water System

CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY ---- Phase I. Technical Appendix O. Municipal TDS Research

Use of Nano-scale materials in Water Purification

KİMYA SANAYİ VE DI TİC.LTD. Tİ.

Evaluation of Alternatives to Domestic Ion Exchange Water Softeners. Mara Wiest Dr. Peter Fox Dr. Lee Wontae, HDR Tim Thomure, HDR

How To Know If Your Well Water Is Safe

Feasibility study of crystallization process for water softening in a pellet reactor

Highly Colored Water Removal Using Nanofiltration Membranes at the Colored Water Treatment Facility. Adam Zacheis, Project Manager Carollo Engineers

A meaningful, cost-effective solution for polishing reverse osmosis permeate

Removing Thallium from Industrial FGD Scrubber Water with Sorbster Adsorbent Media

April 30, 2013 E M. Environmental Management. safety performance cleanup closure

Shale Energy Fluids Management Practices

TREATMENT OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANT WASTE WATER IN FLORIDA FOR DISCHARGE AND RE USE PURPOSES

Mine Water Treatment Solutions for Discharge and Re-Use

Pierre VOC Ground Water Investigation and MTBE Remediation Pilot Study

Remediation of Water-Based Drilling Fluids and Cleaning of Cuttings

Iron and manganese are two similar elements

Managing Floor Drains and Flammable Traps

Amiad s AMF² pre-treatment technology ensures efficient and reliable nanofiltration of Scottish Highland loch water

Application Note NEW LOGIC RESEARCH. Treating Fuel Storage Tank Bottom Water With VSEP. Overview

Nutrient Reduction by Use of Industrial Deep Injection Wells, Miami-Dade County, Florida

Dissolved Mineral Radioactivity in Drinking Water

Cooling Tower Sidestream Filtration A Green, Proven Cost Reduction Technology

for Sediment Removal desired levels. The filtered water then can be chemically treated to ensure its safety. Municipal water Preliminary settling

I N C O R P O R A T E D

MEMCOR membranes for drinking water applications. Water Technologies

APPLICATION GUIDE Choosing an ion exchange system for nitrate removal

Update on Aquifer Storage and Recovery

BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION/REMEDIAL SECTION GUIDANCE INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION OF SALT (CHLORIDE)- IMPACTED SOIL AND GROUND WATER

Chemistry at Work. How Chemistry is used in the Water Service

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

New Cumberland Army Depot Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Marsh Run Park Site Restoration Community Meeting

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Wastewater Reclamation By Craig R. Bartels, PhD Hydranautics, 401 Jones Road, Oceanside California, USA 92054

Chapter 1 Introduction

GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION INFORMATION

Background. 179 million gallons saved for make-up water

DOW Ultrafiltration. Case History. High Turbidity and Temperature Fluctuation No Obstacle for DOW Ultrafiltration

Use of Color Removal Membranes on Waste Water Treatment in the Pulp and Paper Industry

Electrodeionization (EDI)

Source Water Assessment Report

Nine Industrial Scale V SEPs. Feed Tank V SEP. Feed Pumps (Three) Concentrate. Tank. V SEP Treatment System

TCE. The Use & Remediation of TCE at NASA. Keep reading. is developing innovative. NASA s pollution prevention efforts significantly reduced TCE use

ROSS Technology Removal of Oil, Solids and Scale Formers

Cost-Effective Bioremediation of Perchlorate in Soil & Groundwater

Subject: Technical Letter 22 April 1977 Removal of Water Supply Contaminants -- Copper and Zinc

Adam Bayer, San Jose State University

A Long-Range Plan: Melbourne s Drinking Water Supply

Using EDI to Meet the Needs of Pure Water Production

Ion Exchange Softening

Homeowners and Home Buyers Guide to Wells and Private Sewage Systems

FACT SHEET STATEMENT OF BASIS HARLEY DOME 1 PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPDES PERMIT NUMBER: UT NEW PERMIT MINOR INDUSTRIAL

Ion Exchange Design Hand calculation. Brian Windsor (Purolite International Ltd)

Remediation of VOC Contaminated Groundwater

Municipal Standard Solutions. Water Treatment WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination Plant

STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Hardness ions also interfere with many chemical processes such as chemical compounding and aqueous cleaners.

ION EXCHANGE FOR DUMMIES. An introduction

Annual. Water testing performed in Presented By PWS ID#: FL

Zero Discharge Water Management for. Horizontal Shale Gas Well Development

Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory

Presented by: Craig Puerta, PE, MBA December 12, 2012

Well Water Iron Removal Using Quantum DMI-65 Granular Filter Media

CHAPTER 13 LAND DISPOSAL

Pall Aria Integrated MF/RO Systems for Cost-Effective Treatment of Sea and Brackish Waters

Long-Term Monitoring Network Optimization Evaluation. for. Wash King Laundry Superfund Site Lake County, Michigan

Water Treatment & Purification Chemicals

Oakland Unified San Jose Unified Stanford University Santa Ana Unified Newhall Unified Clovis Unified Merced Union High School Grossmont Union High

Daybreak s Environmental History

AQUIFER STORAGE RECOVERY

PREPARING INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING REPORTS

New Jersey Private Well Water Test Reporting Form

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Complete. Water Solutions. for Rural India

Life Cycle Assessment of Three Water Scenarios: Importation, Reclamation, and Desalination

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Wastewater Reuse. Typical treated wastewater is:

Transcription:

4 th & Carey Groundwater Remediation Project and Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System

Contaminated City Well Well #8 4 th and Carey Groundwater contamination from industry was discovered in the Southeast region of Hutchinson in 1982 and has since progressed over the eastern part of the City 17

PWS Well #8 Located at th Ave. & Carey St. 4 th 4 th and Carey Site 4 th and Carey Site consists of 1,240 acres including many of Hutchinson s Industries

Groundwater Contamination CONTAMINANT Carbon tetrachloride Chloroform Tetrachloroethene (PCE) Trichloroethene (TCE) Cis-1, 2-dichloroethene2 Trans-1, 2-dichloroethene2 Hydrocarbons POTENTIAL SOURCE Grain fumigant Degradation product of carbon tetrachloride Dry cleaning fluid Industrial cleaning solvent Degradation product of TCE Degradation product of TCE Petroleum 4

Groundwater Contamination Plumes Chlorides (1000 mg/l) Trichlorethene (TCE) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) Carbon Tetrachloride Vinyl Chloride State Fairgrounds Downtown Hutchinson 4th & Carey Site Obee Road Super Fund Site 17TH AVE 4TH AVE AVE G Arkansas Arkansas River River AIRPORT HALSTEAD LORRAINE MAIN 7

4 th & Carey Groundwater Remediation Project History KDHE mandate to address source areas and cleanup the contaminated groundwater Cooperative effort with industry Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District Disconnect private water wells in the contaminated areas 3

Concerns of Standard Remediation Alternatives Typical Pump, Treat and Discharge Systems Waste a Significant Amount of Water Water Permitting Issues High Chloride Levels in Effluent are Highly Regulated and Complicate Cleanup Efforts 10

Sources of Salt Contamination *Slide Courtesy of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment nt (KDHE)

Chloride Levels in Remedial Wells & Treated Effluent Chloride Concentrations (mg/l) RW-1 RW-2 RW-3 Effluent* 722 402 502 642 *Suggested TMDL MCL <300 mg/l CESSNA SITE 9

Objectives Prevent migration of groundwater contaminants to unimpacted areas. Remove Groundwater Contaminants in the Southeast Region Reclaim Water for Beneficial Use in the Potable Water Supply Comply with Federal and State Regulations 11

Solutions Pump Contaminated Groundwater Reverse Osmosis Membrane Filtration - Remove Chloride & Minerals Air Strippers Remove VOC Treated Water Blended with the City s s Well Water Resulting in Very High Quality Water 13

4 th & Carey Project Components 1. Source Area Remediation (AS/SVE Treatment Systems for Shallow Source Area Groundwater Contamination Approx. 30 deep) 2. Downgradient Remediation and Containment Containment (Extraction Wells for Deep Groundwater Contamination Approx. 60 deep) 3. Reverse Osmosis and Air Stripping Treatment Treatment (Hutchinson Water Treatment Center for RO Treated Water and Untreated Municipal Water Blending) 4. Deep Well Disposal (Class I UIC Non Disposal Wells) (Class I UIC Non-hazardous Deep 14

Catcher s s Mitt Concept Source Area Remediation N 11 th Avenue Source Area Remediation Farmland Airport Road 4 th Avenue Garvey Bunge EW1 RW2 Obee Road Lorraine Street Halstead Street DDW2 EW2 DDW1 Avenue G EW3 RW3 27

Carbon Tetrachloride Source Area Remediation Airport 4 th th & Carey 4Site th th & Carey Site Bunge Farmland Non-domestic Water Well 12

Source Area Remediation 3 AS/SVE Treatment Systems at Farmland Elevator 1 AS/SVE Treatment System at Bunge Elevator

Catcher s s Mitt Concept Source Area Remediation N 11 th Avenue Source Area Remediation Farmland Airport Road 4 th Avenue Garvey Bunge EW1 RW2 Obee Road Lorraine Street Halstead Street DDW2 EW2 DDW1 Avenue G EW3 RW3 27

EW-1 1 (4 th & Carey Extraction Well @ 200 gpm) EW-2 2 (4 th & Carey Extraction Well @ 400 gpm) EW-3 3 (4 th & Carey Extraction Well @ 400 gpm) RW-2 2 (Textron Remediation Well @ 400 gpm) RW-3 3 (Textron Remediation Well @ 1200 gpm) Total 2600 gpm; ; 3.74 MGD Downgradient Remediation & Containment

Monitoring Network Approximately 110 Wells Monitored throughout the course of the yeary

Remediation System Performance/Observations Significant reduction in VOCs observed at source areas. Plume migration towards extraction wells as planned. Results to date are very encouraging.

Catcher s s Mitt Concept Source Area Remediation N 11 th Avenue Source Area Remediation Farmland Airport Road 4 th Avenue Garvey Bunge EW1 RW2 Obee Road Lorraine Street Halstead Street DDW2 EW2 DDW1 Avenue G EW3 RW3 27

Class I Non-hazardous Deep Disposal Well Monitoring of injection pressure and flow rate ensures peak efficiency and regulatory compliance. Double barriers of concrete and steel protect drinking water aquifers. A pressurized annulus fluid is monitored continuously to detect possible leaks. Protective concrete (grout seal) and steel barriers continue to the injection zone. Laterally extensive, poorly permeable confining layer retards upward flow of wastes. Wastewater is trapped in the receiving formation much like million- year-old oil and gas deposits. The packer seals the tubing to the casing. Drinking Water Aquifer Poorly Permeable Rock Brine Aquifer DDW-1 (Deep Disposal Well #1 @ 1250 gpm) DDW-2 (Deep Disposal Well #2 @ 1250 gpm) DDW-3 (Future Disposal Well #3 @ 1250 gpm) Current Capacity 2500 gpm; ; 3.6 MGD Future Capacity 3750 gpm; ; 5.4 MGD Over time, the wastes convert into less harmful substances. Arbuckle Formation 4,000 to 4,800 feet deep 25

City of Hutchinson Class I UIC Well #1 Construction Arbuckle Formation 4,000 to 4,800 feet deep 25

Deep Disposal Well System

RO Water Treatment Facility Deep Disposal Wells

Hutchinson Water Treatment System Schematic Remediation Wells Contaminated City Wells (future) 8 MGD 6 MGD Water Treatment Facility Reverse Osmosis Plant Air Stripper 2 MGD 6 MGD PERMEATE CONCEN- TRATE Deep Well Disposal City Northwest Wells 4 MGD Water Water Blending Blending at at New New Clear Clear Well Well Water Distribution System 10 MGD (ADF) 23.4 MGD (PDF) 15

City of Hutchinson Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Facility North Process Building Elevation

City of Hutchinson Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Center

Water Treatment System 3 Dual Chamber Pressure Sand Filters (2 filters per vessel 1.61 MGD treatment capacity per filter) 6 Cartridge Filter Units (5 micron) (1.68 MGD per filter unit) 4 RO Feed Pumps (1400 gpm,, 250 HP each) 4 RO Treatment Module Skids (2 MGD input/1.5 MGD output treatment capacity each) 1 Air Stripper/Degasifier Tower (7.56 MGD treatment capacity) 13

THE FILTRATION SPECTRUM mm 0.001 0.01 0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 A 10 100 1000 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 MOLECULAR WEIGHT 100 200 5,000 20,000 100,000 500,000 Aqueous Salts Carbon Black Paint Pigment RELATIVE SIZE OF COMMON MATERIAL Metal Ions Pyrogens Virus Bacteria Yeast Cells Beach Sand Colloidal Silica Pollens Sugars Albumin Protein Milled Flour FILTRATION TECHNO- LOGY RO NF Ultrafiltration Microfiltration Particle filtration

RO Membrane Separation Mechanism Pressure FEED FLOW H 2 O Na + HCO 3 SO 4 ++ Ca H 2 O H 2 O Cl ++ Mg H 2 O Fe ++ Concentrated Salts H 2 O H 2 O H 2 O Membrane H 2 O H 2 O H 2 O Permeate

UF Spiral Module RO Spiral Module

Water Treatment Pumping Systems 4 Low Service Raw Water Pumps to Treatment (1900 gpm,, 75 HP each) 3 Waste Transfer Pumps to Disposal Wells (1050 gpm,, 30 HP each) 2 Pressure Filter Backwash Pumps (3500 gpm,, 75 HP each) 6 High Service Pumps to Distribution System (3300 gpm,, 250 HP each) 13

Water Quality Results Total Hardness (mg/l) Chloride (mg/l) Pre RO Treatment 300 138 Current 120 55 Drinking Water Standard 400 250 30

Projected Water Demand Average Daily Flow (MGD) Peak Daily Flow (MGD) EXISTING (2000) 6.5 15.0 PROJECTED (2010) 8.1 19.1 PROJECTED (2030) 10.0 23.4 29

Benefits for the City of Hutchinson Higher quality of water for the community Extends life of household plumbing and appliances Provides comprehensive solution to industrial community Modular and easily expandable water treatment center to accommodate future capacity needs Meets existing and future water supply regulations (insurance policy for future generations) 34

Benefits for the Environment Cleans up the Equus Beds Aquifer Prevents migration of contamination to protect the groundwater Eliminates discharge of high chloride water into surface waterways Beneficial use of remediated water Reduces use of current groundwater supply, by replacing it with remediated water 34

PROJECT COST: Groundwater Contamination Source Remediation $ 740,000 RO Concentrate and Wastewater Deep Disposal Wells (DDW( DDW s) $ 4,095,000 Groundwater Remediation Wells and Pipelines $ 2,610,000 RO Water Treatment Plant $17,660,000 RO Raw Water, Concentrate and Distribution System Pipelines $ 9,340,000 Total $34,445,000 PROJECT FUNDING: Payments from Companies Responsible for Contamination $12,222,000 TIF District Tax Proceeds and Interest Earned $ 1,086,000 Federal Grants ($3.5 million less grant admin. costs) $ 3,372,000 KDHE Low Interest Loans City Funds $16,650,000 Water Utility Capital Improvement (CIP) Funds City Funds $ 1,350,000 Total $34,680,000

Cooperative Effort City of Hutchinson Potential Responsible Parties (PRPs( PRPs) State Agencies Federal Assistance Solution 33

Questions?