INTEGRATED METHODS IN COST EFFECTIVE AQUIFER REMEDIATION: 3 FIELD EXPERIENCES



Similar documents
Bioremediation of contaminated soil. Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University

Well gauging results LNAPL in Benzol Processing Area

In-situ Bioremediation of oily sediments and soil

In-Situ Remediation Strategies as Sustainable Alternatives to Traditional Options. Ryan Bernesky, B.Sc., P.Ag. February 26, 2013

BIOREMEDIATION: A General Outline Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.

In-situ Chemical Oxidation via Ozone at a Multiple-Remedy UST Site

In-well Vapor Stripping

Innovative LNAPL Recovery Techniques

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Ground Water Extraction System Subsurface Performance Checklist

Mark A. Lehar, P.Geo. Regional Environmental Lead and Senior Environmental Geologist

Not Cleaning Up Someone Else s

OZONE SPARGE TECHNOLOGY FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Charles R. Plummer, P.E., M.S., Michael D. Luckett, P.E., Shaun Porter, and Robert Moncrief

Bioremediation of Petroleum Contamination. Augustine Ifelebuegu GE413

CHAPTER 7: REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

Environmental and Economical Oil and Groundwater Recovery and Treatment Options for hydrocarbon contaminated Sites

HISTORICAL OIL CONTAMINATION TRAVEL DISTANCES IN GROUND WATER AT SENSITIVE GEOLOGICAL SITES IN MAINE

Street Address (number and street): City: County: ZIP Code: B. CURRENT SITE PRIORITY INFORMATION Was free product present this quarter?

Pierre VOC Ground Water Investigation and MTBE Remediation Pilot Study

A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION: FULL SCALE APPLICATION

Presumptive Remedy: Supplemental Bulletin Multi-Phase Extraction (MPE) Technology for VOCs in Soil and Groundwater Quick Reference Fact Sheet

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

Soil and Groundwater. Removing Contaminants. Groundwater. Implementing. Remediation. Technologies 1 / 6

Proxy Simulation of In-Situ Bioremediation System using Artificial Neural Network

San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil

Guide to the Remediation Report & Fee Submission Form

Bioremediation. Introduction

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland

Remediation projects dealing process International evolution and experiences Jurgen BUHL (Cornelsen Umwelttechnologie GmbH, Germany)

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Long Term Monitoring Optimization (LTMO) Concepts and tools

2015 Mehrdad Javaherian, Ph.D., MPH, PE, LEED GA

Technical Report TR-2222-ENV

In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvent R&D 100 Award Winner

Improper storage of fuel on construction sites will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur as a result of leaks or spills.

Accelerated Site Cleanup Using a Sulfate-Enhanced In Situ Remediation Strategy

Bioremediation. Biodegradation

Removal of diesel hydrocarbons by constructed wetlands Isotope methods to describe degradation

Bioremediation of Contaminated Soils: A Comparison of In Situ and Ex Situ Techniques. Jera Williams

Conceptual Model. Evaluating Hydrocarbon Removal from Source Zones and its Effect on Dissolved Plume Longevity and Magnitude. Source.

Site Assessment for the Proposed Coke Point Dredged Material Containment Facility at Sparrows Point

MBJ Environmental Programmes

Water Pollution. A Presentation for Café Scientifique Cherie L. Geiger, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry, UCF

Former T&T Standard Hwy 34 & S. 3rd Ave. Woonsocket, SD PRCF # 1853 DENR#

Ex Centrale Gas (RA) Eni Div. Exploration & Production

6 Chemicals from human settlements

Long-Term Monitoring Network Optimization Evaluation. for. Wash King Laundry Superfund Site Lake County, Michigan

EMERGENCY PETROLEUM SPILL WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDANCE. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (303)

Vapor Intrusion Pathway: A Practical Guideline

FMC Environmental Solutions Peroxygen Talk January 2010 Use of Compound Specific Isotope Analysis to Enhance In Situ

Utilizing an Innovative, Effective Site Assessment and Monitoring Tool

Frequently Asked Questions on the Alberta Tier 1 and Tier 2 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines. February 2008

Forensic Fingerprinting Petroleum Contaminants using UVF Field Screening Technology

Frequently Asked Questions FAQ (click to follow link) How Does The Thermal Well System Work? How Much Does It Cost?

SOIL AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN For Site Located at 420 South Avenue Rochester, New York NYSDEC Spill No PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:

Distribution Restriction Statement

SANTA FE COUNTY'S OIL DEVELOPMENT ZONING ORDINANCE

Former Williams AFB Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

Petroleum Hydrocarbons And Chlorinated Solvents Differ In Their Potential For Vapor Intrusion

Guidance for Design, Installation and Operation of In Situ Air Sparging Systems

Risk Assessment Based Environmental Management Systems for Petroleum Retail Stores

BP Texas City Refinery

Guidance on Remediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Ground Water By Natural Attenuation

Evalution of Methanothrophic Bacteria during Injection of Gaseous Nutrients for In Situ Trichloroethylene Bioremediation in a Sanitary Landfill

Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds with Oxygen and Propane Gas infusion

ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

Cost-Effective Bioremediation of Perchlorate in Soil & Groundwater

CHAPTER 13 LAND DISPOSAL

Project SIReN: Phase 2b Further Investigation (Phase 2b) of the SIReN (Site for Innovative Research on Natural Attenuation) site

BLUE ISLAND NORTHEAST MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL PARK 119TH STREET & VINCENNES AVENUE BLUE ISLAND, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

TERRA TEK LIMITED GUIDE TO SAMPLE HANDLING. Version 1.06

Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability to Landfill Leachate Induced Arsenic Contamination in Maine, US - Intro GIS Term Project Final Report

How To Improve The Biodegradation Of Btu

SPILL PREVENTION PLAN

การช วบ าบ ด (Bioremediation)

CHAPTER IV METHODS FOR EVALUATING RECOVERABILITY OF FREE PRODUCT

Interim Summary Report for the Treatment Facility D Helipad In-Situ Bioremediation Treatability Test

A MODEL OF IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION THAT INCLUDES THE EFFECT OF RATE- LIMITED SORPTION AND BIOAVAILABILITY

Redeveloping Former Gas Stations

APPENDIX O. Spill Prevention and Emergency Response Plan. G3 Terminal Vancouver Port Metro Vancouver Project Permit Application APPENDIX O

Inventory of Performance Monitoring Tools for Subsurface Monitoring of Radionuclide Contamination

Injection of Fentons Reagent In-Situ Case studies. Introduction. Introduction. Background - Principles

Appendix B. Vol. 2 - River Corridor. Cost Information for Groundwater Remediation Systems

Community Involvement Plan

Response: A bench scale test will be conducted on samples collected after the source removal activities are considered complete so that the samples

June 29, 2012 Version 1.2

HW10 PCBs/Pesticides Remediation 10 points Due: Nov. 21

PROTOCOL NO. 5: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analytical Methods and Standards

Presented by: Craig Puerta, PE, MBA December 12, 2012

University Lands THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

SUCCESSFUL FIELD-SCALE IN SITU THERMAL NAPL REMEDIATION AT THE YOUNG-RAINEY STAR CENTER

Chapter 12 Physical and Chemical Groundwater Remediation Technologies

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD RESOLUTION NO

Aspects of bioremediation of polluted soils with hydrocarbons

RESPONSE TO INLAND OIL SPILLS

Biotechnology in Industrial Waste Treatment and Bioremediation

Lesson Plan: How Do We Clean Polluted Water?

Groundwater Remediation Strategies Tool

1.72, Groundwater Hydrology Prof. Charles Harvey Lecture Packet #2: Aquifers, Porosity, and Darcy s Law. Lake (Exposed Water Table)

References Book of HERA Group. Cleaning, Restoring and Remediation treatment of polluted soils

Ground-Water Circulation Wells

Transcription:

INTEGRATED METHODS IN COST EFFECTIVE AQUIFER REMEDIATION: 3 FIELD EXPERIENCES PRANDI Alberto XELLA Claudio: Water & Soil Remediation S.r.l., Levata di Curtatone (MN), Italy. SUMMARY Groundwater impacted by petroleum products was successfully treated using an integration of two or more methods in 3 field cases. The principle of operation involved groundwater oxygenation (by means of Air Sparging) and a simultaneous increase in groundwater velocity (Pump & Treat). Water table depression (Pump & Treat, slurping) and subsequent ventilation (Bioventing) of the previously saturated subsoil also proved to be an effective combination. In these 3 cases TPH concentrations in soil were reduced from 600 9000 mg/kg to 5 50 mg/kg. TPH concentrations in groundwater were reduced from 6000 60000 µg/l to 5 90 µg/l. KEYWORDS: aquifer remediation, integrated methods, Pump and Treat, Air Sparging, Bioventing. INTRODUCTION Aquifer remediation is often problematic: target reductions in pollution concentrations and in treatment time are not easily met through standard methods such as Pump&Treat or Air Sparging/Biosparging. However, in many cases an integrated application of different technologies provides more effective results both in terms of remediation and cost; in this paper we present three field experiences that advocate this integrated approach. 259

INTEGRATED METHODS IN COST EFFECTIVE AQUIFER REMEDIATION: 3 FIELD EXPERIENCES SITE CONDITIONS Case Study 1 (PD) refers to a loss of gasoline from an UST polluting an area of 500 m 2 to a depth of 4 meters (Figure 1a) with separated and dissolved phases; sandy aquifer with 70 mg/kg BTEX, and 600 mg/kg TPH present. Case Study 2 (VR) is a service station where a loss of gasoline reached the ground water with separated and dissolved phases; the water table is 20 m in depth in sandy gravel (Fig. 1b) containing 3900 mg/kg BTEX and 9600 mg/kg TPH. Case Study 3 (AT) is an area where an old petroleum product terminal had released large quantities of diesel into the vadose zone and groundwater. Previous to this the water table had already been impacted by gasoline and fuel oil. The saturated medium is sandy (100 mg/kg BTEX and 3000 mg/kg TPH) and the piezometric level is 7 m b.g. (Fig. 1c). 260

PRANDI Alberto INTEGRATED REMEDIATION METHODS In all three cases a combination of two or more treatments was applied with the aim of simultaneously oxygenating groundwater and increasing groundwater velocity, and as a result accelerating oxygen transfer across the saturated porous medium. The water table depression and subsequent ventilation of the subsoil where previously the capillary fringe was present also proved to be an effective combination treatment. An increase in groundwater velocity and a reduction in water table level were both obtained by a Pump & Treat process while biostimulation was induced by Air Sparging and Bioventing. In Site 1 Pump & Treat consisted of a pumping well that initially recovered the separated phase floating on the water table; then oxygen transfer was performed by an Air Sparging network, while well pumping was kept in operation. Dissolved oxygen measurements were taken to confirm and study the effectiveness of this integrated approach. In Site 2 Pump & Treat was used to collect the free phase floating on the water table and to depress the piezometric level in the plume area. Then Bioventing treatment was applied to the vadose zone including the part previously saturated by the capillary fringe. Respirometric tests and groundwater analysis following the natural piezometric excursion were carried out to verify and study the effect of groundwater manipulation on remediation. Soil boring was also performed to complete the operation. Site 3 was engineered with a combination of various treatments. Pump&Treat consisted of 4 pumping wells in order to obtain oil recovery and to create a hydraulic barrier; oil recovery was accelerated by means of a slurping network system; treatment in the water table was integrated with Air Sparging in order to increase oxygen transport velocity across the impacted saturated soil. Then Bioventing was applied to the vadose zone. Oil recovery rate, dissolved oxygen and VOC were monitored along with respirometric tests in order to measure the extent and benefit of this integrated approach. 261

INTEGRATED METHODS IN COST EFFECTIVE AQUIFER REMEDIATION: 3 FIELD EXPERIENCES RESULTS All cases showed a considerable success in the removal of hydrocarbons from the subsoil, through free phase recovery, volatilization and biodegradation. See Fig. 2a, 2b and 2c. TPH removals vs. time 262

PRANDI Alberto In terms of soil and groundwater quality, the following histograms (Fig 3a, 3b) show the results for the three sites: SOIL and GROUNDWATER before and after treatment 263

INTEGRATED METHODS IN COST EFFECTIVE AQUIFER REMEDIATION: 3 FIELD EXPERIENCES ADVANTAGES and PROSPECTS for the FUTURE The main advantages of applying integrated methods for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated aquifers, compared with a singular standard application, can be summarized as follows: a more vigorous and varied treatment of the aquifer overcomes the problems created by site anysotropy and a paucity of knowledge from the initial pollution assessment more overall cost effective remediation is obtained, offsetting high initial investment. 264