Progress on Off-site Cleanup and Interim Storage in Japan



Similar documents
How To Decontaminate A Special Decontamination Area

Progress on Off-site Cleanup Efforts in Japan. October 2013 Ministry of the Environment, Japan

Seismic Damage Information (the 231st Release) (As of 14:00 August 16, 2011)

Decontamination Project in Fukushima Prefecture Conducted by Japanese Government

The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

(1) Establishment of organizations and instruction for evacuation etc.

Restoration Status for Damage Caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake and Future Responses

Exposures from the Events at the NPPs in Fukushima following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

DISASTER RESTORATION VISIONS FOR TOMIOKAMACHI AND DECONTAMINATION PROJECT

Provisional Translation Basic Policy for the Contaminated Water Issue at the TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

The integrity evaluation of the reactor building at unit4 in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station

Disaster status in Fukushima Prefecture Damage of an earthquake and the tsunami

Sharing and coordinating the response to disaster relief and restoration

Damage of Fukushima Nuclear Accident and a new compensation scheme

Great East Japan Earthquake and the seismic damage to the NPSs

How To Help With The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, TEPCO. Progress Status

Results of Airborne Monitoring by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the U.S. Department of Energy

15 April 2015 Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan. 1. Overview

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

Preventing Storm Water Pollution: What We Can Do

Clear Water Projects in Cooksville Creek Watershed

Part II. Trend in MLIT Policies

Contents Small- to Mid-Size River Development Projects. Recent issues. 1.1 The rivers of Tokyo. Small- to Mid-Size River Development Projects

Overview of the Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS) at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. March 29, 2013 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Toronto s Wet Weather Flow Master Plan

Specific Information on the Restriction of Electricity Use under the Electricity Business Act

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Flooding Fast Facts. flooding), seismic events (tsunami) or large landslides (sometime also called tsunami).

Phosphorus. Phosphorus Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management.

Guidelines (Master Plan) for Disaster Waste Management after the Great East Japan Earthquake

Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations

Best Practice of Flood Hazard Map in Japan

How To Recover From A Flood In Bundaberg

Employee Training Plan Farm A

2013 TEPCO ILLUSTRATED

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN TEMPLATE. 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1.1 Project Name and Location Date

Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Questions Landowners Should Ask in Negotiations with Companies Seeking Easements

Software platforms for Collecting, Managing and Providing Monitoring Data for Food and Agricultural Products

APPENDIX F. RESIDENTIAL WATER QUALITY PLAN: ALLOWABLE BMP OPTIONS

Environmental Remediation Examples and Remediation Strategic Planning

BASEMENT FLOODING. Prevention Guide for. Homeowners

DISASTER COUNTERMEASURES BASIC ACT

March 16, 2015 Susumu Tanaka NEC Corporation

Asbestos Storage Facility Plan Examples

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Act on Special Measures Concerning Nuclear Emergency Preparedness (Act No. 156 of December 17, 1999)

Outlet stabilization structure

On Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspections. March Building and Development Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing

What to do if sewage floods your property

Japanese Requirements for Wind Turbine TÜV Rheinland Japan

Tokyo Waterworks supports the capital of Tokyo

Activities of Nuclear Damage Compensation & Decommissioning Facilitation Corporation (NDF) Yasuharu Igarashi

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION

Damage to Sewage Treatment Systems caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Government s Response

Nuclear Safety Regulation Reform in Japan

( 1 ) Overview of Safety Measures ( 2 ) Overview of Measures for Attaining Greater Safety and Reliability

Operations and Maintenance Plan The Residences at Johnson Farm 189 Landham Road Sudbury, Massachusetts. Submitted to: Town of Sudbury

Storm Drainage Systems

London Borough of Waltham Forest LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. Summary Document

INDONESIA - LAW ON WATER RESOURCES,

Final Report on the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company --- Recommendations ---

Basic system of measures for flood damage mitigation in Japan. Preparedness for major floods

STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: National Response to I-131 from Japan Nuclear Power Plant March 27, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Basements and Deep Building Construction Policy 2014

SECTION 104 PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION

The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) A guide for developers

ー Reconstruction after the Great East Japan Earthquake ー

Recommendations for future developments

Vehicle Tracking Control (VTC)

CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet

Outdoor Storage of Raw Materials SC-33

PRESENT SITUATION AND FUTURE DIRECTION OF FALL ACCIDENT PREVENTION MEASURES BASED ON THE INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND HEALTH LAW

16. Storm water drainage

Damage to Drinking Water Systems and Restoration Measures after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. July 2011

Property Care White Papers. Site Drainage: Monitor and Maintain

London Borough of Merton Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

The Realities of Disaster Recovery: How the Japan Data Center Council is Successfully Operating in the Aftermath of the Earthquake

at a disposal site for which a permit has been issued; or

Waste Handling & Disposal

Stormwater Control Measures for Tokyo

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

ALLEGANY WIND POWER PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SPILL PREVENTION PLAN

How To Conduct An Environmental Impact Assessment

The Current Situation and Circumstances Regarding the Great Earthquake Damage

INFORMATION BULLETIN BUSINESS FLOOD PLANNING AND MITIGATION GUIDE ACE GLOBAL RISK ENGINEERING. Flood risk assessment. Introduction

Financial Summary 3rd quarter of FY2012. January 29, 2013 Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc.

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGNS BIOSWALE/HYBRID DITCH

PRIVATE TREATMENT CONTROL BMP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE VERIFICATION FORM BIORETENTION FACILITIES, VEGETATED SWALES & HIGHER RATE BIOFILTERS

PIPELINE ROUTING PERMIT. For A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DAKOTA AND RAMSEY COUNTIES ISSUED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY D/B/A XCEL ENERGY

Objective 4: Enhanced community education, flood awareness and preparedness

Providing Aerial Photographs and Geographic Information of the Disaster Area by the Great East Japan Earthquake 43

Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) Model Stormwater Ordinance for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements August 2010

Storm Water Management Requirements for Construction Projects Less than One Acre

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

Water Conservation and the State s New Green Building Code for Residential Construction

Transcription:

Progress on Off-site Cleanup and Interim Storage in Japan September 2015 Ministry of the Environment, Japan

1. Policy Framework Outline 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 1

Radioactive Pollution Caused by the Accident at TEPCO s Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS Fukushima city Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS 20km 30km 100km Yokohama Tokyo Legend Air dose rate at 1m height above the ground(μsv/h) (as of Sep. 18, 2011) 250km No data 2

Radioactive Pollution Caused by the Accident at TEPCO s Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS Decontamination is one of the measures for radiation protection*to remove radioactive materials from the inhabitation areas in order to promptly decrease impacts on human health and the environment. *The national government aims at a long-term goal to reduce additional annual dose to 1 msv or less by comprehensive measures for radiation risk management including not only decontamination, but also monitoring survey, food safety administration, risk communication, etc. Aircraft monitoring survey by MEXT/Japan and DOE/US (as of Apr. 29, 2011) Aircraft monitoring (msv/yr) 100-50-100 20-50 10-20 5-10 1-5 Date city Iitate Diagram of the areas to which evacuation order were issued (As of Sep. 5, 2015) Minami-soma Kawamata Kawamata Iitate Minamisoma Katsurao かつらおむら Katsurao Kawauchi Namie Futaba Okuma Tomioka Naraha Residents have difficulties in returning for a long time 50mSv/y~) Residents are not permitted to live (20mSv/y ~50mSv/y) Evacuation orders are ready to be lifted (~20mSv/y ) Evacuation orders were lifted The number in () is designated standard in each area Tamura Kawauchi Namie Iwaki city Futaba 双 葉 町 Okuma Tomioka Naraha Hirono NPS Dai-ichi NPS Dai-ni 20km 3

Framework of Decontamination Legislation for Promoting Decontamination The Act on Special Measures Concerning the Handling of Radioactive Pollution came into force on January 1, 2012. Based on this Act, the following are carried out: - Planning and implementation of decontamination work - Collection, transfer, temporary storage, and final disposal Special Decontamination Area (SDA) 11 municipalities in the restricted zone (former) or the planned evacuation zone (< 20 km from the NPS, or annual cumulative dose is > 20 msv) Decontamination is implemented by the national government (*) Entire areas of Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma, Futaba, Namie, Katsurao, and Iitate. Some areas of Tamura, Minami Soma, Kawamata, and Kawauchi. Intensive Contamination Survey Area (ICSA) 104 municipalities in 8 Prefectures (*), in which over 0.23 μsv/hour of air dose rate (estimated from the long-term target of annual additional exposure dose, 1 msv/year, under a certain condition) were designated as ICSAs. Decontamination is implemented by each municipality. The national government will finance and provide technical assistance. (*) Iwate, Miyagi, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Saitama, and Chiba 4

Decontamination based on the Act on Special Measures 1) Special Decontamination Area 2) Intensive Contamination Survey Area Designation of SDA by the Minister of the Environment Designation of ICSA by the Minister of the Environment (Areas where air dose rate is 0.23μSv/h or more) 0.23μSv/h is a criterion for designation of ICSA and not a decontamination target Development of the decontamination implementation plan in the SDA by the Minister of the Environment Survey measurement by the mayors of the municipalities Development of the decontamination implementation plan by the mayors of the municipalities Implementation of decontamination by the national government Implementation of decontamination by the municipalities, etc. (The national government allocates budgets.) Note: The air dose rate 0.23μSv/h corresponds to a cautiously estimated individual exposure dose of 1mSv/y assuming that people spend 1 8 hours outside 2 16 hours in a wooden house with a low shielding rate in a day Decontamination and disposal of soil at NPS Implemented by the nuclear power station operating company in charge (TEPCO) 5

Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 6

Decontamination Policy for the Special Decontamination Area Decontamination efforts are determined by the level of air dose rates based on the decontamination implementation plans. Area where non-background (additional) exposure rate is higher than 50mSv/year (Area Where Residents Have Difficulties in Returning for a Long Time): Policies are determined by radiation dose outlook based on demonstration model projects, residents intention of returning, and visions for future industry and reconstruction. Area where the additional exposure rate is between 20-50mSv/year (Area Where Residents Are Not Permitted to Live): Decontamination, aiming to reduce exposure dose in residential areas and farmlands to less than 20mSv/year. Area where additional exposure rate is lower than 20mSv/year (Area Where Evacuation Orders Are Ready to be Lifted): Decontamination is implemented as well. MOE reviewed the progress of decontamination in the SDA and announced on September 10, 2013 that it will revise the previous policy that aimed to complete decontamination and transfer generated materials to temporary storage sites in two years (by the end of March 2014) for all municipalities and will promote decontamination in accordance with reconstruction activities depending on the situation of each municipality. MOE announced on December 26, 2013 that it set practical schedules for Minami-Soma, Iitate, Kawamata, Katsurao, Namie and Tomioka in accordance with the situation of each municipality, in consultation with them. Areas with evacuated residents will be the priority decontamination areas. The decontamination infrastructure work which is important for the evacuees to return home (such as water supply, sewage, and major roads) will be started in advance. The decontamination projects should be implemented in an accelerated and smooth manner and the project lengths should be shortened as much as possible. The work process should be fully controlled and the progress status should be made open to the public. 7

Progress in the Special Decontamination Area1(As of the end of August 2015) Tamura Whole area decontamination was completed in June 2013. Evacuation order was lifted on April 1, 2014 Iitate Joban Expressway Kawauchi Naraha Whole area decontamination was completed in March 2014. Evacuation order in Areas to which evacuation orders are ready to be lifted were lifted on Oct. 1, 2014 Whole area decontamination was completed in March 2014. Evacuation order was lifted on Sep. 5, 2015 Kawamata Minami- Soma Okuma Whole area decontamination was completed in Mar. 2014 Joban Expressway Decontamination was completed in June 2013 Opened the entire line on Mar. 1, 2015 Katsurao Decontamination of the residential area was completed in July 2014. Aiming to complete decontamination of the remaining area within 2015 Katsurao Namie Kawamata Decontamination of the residential area was completed in Aug. 2014. Aiming to complete decontamination of the remaining area within 2015 Decontamination completed & Evacuation order lifted Completed Tamura Futaba Okuma TEPCO Dai-ichi NPS Iitate Minami- Soma Decontamination of the residential area was completed in June 2015, aiming to complete decontamination of the remaining area within 2016 Aiming to complete decontamination of the residential area within FY 2015 and of the remaining area within FY 2016 Residential areas completed Implementing Ordered Kawauchi Tomioka Namie Aiming to complete decontamination of the remaining area, except for the affected area by tsunami, within FY 2015 For the affected area by tsunami, aiming to complete decontamination of the residential are within FY 2015 and of the remaining area within FY 2016 Special Decontamination Area Areas where it is anticipated that residents will face difficulties in returning for a long time. Naraha Evacuation order was lifted in Naraha on Sep. 5, 2015 Tomioka Futaba Aiming to complete decontamination of the residential area within FY 2015 and of the remaining area within FY 2016 Aiming to complete decontamination within FY 2015

Progress in the Special Decontamination Area 2 Decontamination plans have been established in all the 11 municipalities, and progress has been made. Decontamination was completed in Tamura in June, 2013, and in Naraha / Kawauchi / Okuma in March 2014. Population in Decontamination Target Area(person) (approx. Figure) Decontamination Target Area (ha) (approx. figure) Rearrangement of the Restricted areas, etc. Decontamination Plan Progress of Decontamination Work < as of the end of August 2015 > Temporary Storage Site*1 Consent of Decontamination landowners, etc. activities Time of completion*3 (outlook) Residential Areas completed The rest of other areas completed Tamura 400 500 Apr. 2012 Apr. 2012 Secured Completed Completed Completed in June 2013 Whole area decontamination was completed Kawauchi 400 500 Apr. 2012 Apr. 2012 Secured Completed Completed Completed in March 2014 Naraha 7,700 2,100 Aug. 2012 Apr. 2012 Secured completed Completed Completed in March 2014 Okuma 400 400 Dec. 2012 Dec. 2012 Secured Completed Completed Completed in March 2014 Katsurao 1,400 1,700 Mar. 2013 Sep. 2012 Secured Almost completed In progress Completed in July 2014 Within 2015 Decontamination of residential area was completed Decontamination is under operation & in preparation Kawamata 1,200 1,600 Aug. 2012 Aug. 2013 Secured Iitate 6,000 5,600 Jul. 2012 May 2012 secured Minami- Soma 13,300 6,100 Apr.2012 Apr.2012 Namie 18,800 3,300 Apr. 2013 Nov. 2012 approx. 90% secured approx. 70% (approx.50) *2 Tomioka 11,300 2,800 Mar. 2013 June 2013 secured Almost completed Almost completed In progress In progress Completed in Aug. 2014 Completed in June 2015 Within 2015 Within2016 approx.80% In progress FY2015 FY2016 approx. 80% In progress FY2015 FY2016 Almost completed In progress FY2015 FY2016 Futaba 300 200 May, 2013 July 2014 secured approx. 80% In progress FY 2015 Note 1: Securement ratio of Temporary Storage Sites = Temporary Storage Sites area,which are contracted as land lease / necessary Temporary Storage Sites Necessary areas for securing Temporary Storage Sites might be reviewed in a future survey Note 2: The number in () was the number in last month. When there is no change, it is not indicated Note 3: In the municipalities where decontamination was completed, such as Tamura, Kawauchi, Naraha, and Okuma, remaining decontamination shall be implemented for the residents who did not originally consent, but have since consented 9

Progress in the Special Decontamination Area 3 Progress on decontamination works (executing ratio and ordering ratio) is as follows as of the end of August 2015: As of the end of Aug. 2015 E=Executing ratio O=Ordering ratio < Unit % > Kawa- Minami- Tamura Kawauchi Naraha Okuma Karsurao Iitate Namie Tomioka Futaba mata Soma E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O Residen- tial area 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 32 (26) 100 19 100 54 (48) 100 11 (5) 100 Farmland 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 92 (86) 100 34 (32) 100 43 (42) 100 16 (15) 100 18 100 16 (12) 100 4 (-) 100 Forest 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99.9 100 81 (77) 100 66 (57) 100 46 100 34 100 97 (82) 100 1 (-) 100 Road 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 63 (53) 100 11 (6) 100 29 (28) 100 7 (6) 100 41 (40) 100 81 (78) 100-100 Note 1: Executing ratio is calculated as follows: 1Areas in which decontamination work (weeding, removal of sediment, and cleaning, etc.) is completed / 2All areas to be decontaminated Note 2: Ordering ratio is calculated as follows: 3Areas for which MOE has given decontamination contracts to JVs (Joint Ventures)/ 2All areas to be decontaminated Note 3: 1, 2, 3 might be modified with further review Note 4: The number in () was the number in the former month. When there is no change, it is not listed Note 5: This calculation of executing & ordering ration do not include the number in the Areas where it is anticipated that residents will face difficulties in returning for a long time 10

Ottozawa, Okuma Okuma municipal office Tsushima, Namie* Yorunomori Park, Tomioka Tomioka Daini junior high school Gongendo, Namie Kusano, Iitate* Hayashi factory, Iitate* Ichibankan, nursing home, in Iitate* Kikuchi factory, Iitate* Kainosaka, Kawauchi Around municipal office in Katsurao Around Kanabusa elementary school, Minami-Soma Minami factory complex in Naraha Average Value of 14 districts The dose rate is the averaged value measured in each of the sites. The value immediately after decontamination [green column] is normalized to be 100%. Comparison of average figure on air dose rate (assuming the figure after the work as 100) 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 The result of Post-Decontamination Monitoring Approx. 460% 0.0 Just after the work 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 st follow-up survey 84 77 93 81 76 71 75 51 92 98 87 73 72 108 81 2 nd follow-up survey 80 67 89 76 72 66 73 49 86 89 68 67 69 95 75 3 rd follow-up survey 72 64 75 70 66 61 68 46 79 84 58 63 64 87 69 4 th follow-up survey 66 62 71 63 60 56 60 31 70 75 54 55 58 82 63 5 th follow-up survey 64 59 69 61 56 53 57 29 67 70 49 51 53 68 60 6 th follow-up survey 60 54 63 55 53 49 50 26 58 64 41 46 49 61 55 7 th follow-up survey 55 50 59 50 48 45 47 24 52 59 40 43 45 55 51 8 th follow-up survey 51 48 55 49 46 43 45 23 50 56 39 41 42 53 48 除 Measured 染 直 前 result の 測 定 just 結 before 果 the (H23.11 work(nov.&dec., 月 12 月 2011) ) Measured 除 染 直 後 result の 測 定 just 結 after 果 the work(dec., (H23.12 月 2011~Apr., ~H24.4 月 2014) ) 1第 st 1 follow-up 回 調 査 survey 結 果 (Oct., (H24.10 2012) 月 ) 2第 nd 2 follow-up 回 調 査 結 survey 果 (Mar., (H25.3 2013) 月 ) 3第 rd 3 follow-up 回 調 査 結 survey 果 (May., (H25.52013~Jul., 月 ~7 月 2013) ) 4th 第 4 follow-up 回 調 査 結 survey 果 (Sep.&Oct., (H25.9 月 10 2013) 月 ) 5th 第 5 follow-up 回 調 査 結 survey 果 (Dec., (H25.12 2013) 月 ) 6th 第 6 follow-up 回 調 査 結 survey 果 (Mar.&Apr., (H26.3 月 4 2014) 月 ) 7th 第 7 follow-up 回 調 査 結 survey 果 (Jun.&Jul., (H26.6 月 2014) 7 月 ) 8th 第 8 follow-up 回 調 査 結 survey 果 (Sep., (H26.9 2014) 月 ) *:Measurement result just after the decontamination work in Tsushima, Namie and Iitate, might be possibly low because of accumulated snow Note 1: Measurement figure might be changed by environmental condition, e.g. climate condition, such as rainfall, snowfall, Note 2: 2 years and 6 months passed between the post-decontamination measurement and the 8 th follow-up survey. The air dose rate was reduced by 40% during that time as a result of physical attenuation 11

Air dose rate (μsv/h) Effects of Decontamination Work in Kawauchi Air dose rate at the height of 1m from the ground at entire Kawauchi village* Air dose rates at residential areas : decreased approx. 45% comparing before decontamination to after decontamination decreased approx. 63% comparing before decontamination to post-decontamination monitoring and the effects of decontamination have been retained *entire Kawauchi village: indicates both former Areas in Which Residents are not Permitted to Live and former Areas to Which Evacuation Orders are Ready to be Lifted Before decontamination After decontamination Post-decontamination monitoring Farmland Residential areas Forest near residential area Road 12 12

Overview of the Decontamination Project in Tamura City Decontamination work based on the Decontamination Implementation Plan has been finished in Tamura City. Work Period:July 5, 2012~June 28, 2013 Number of Workers:Max. 1,300/day (A total of 120,000/ man-hour days) Decontamination target area: residential area and a part of forests (area within 20m from the edge) in Furumichi, Miyakoji district Volumes of work Buildings 228,249m2(121 family units) Roads 95.6km Farmland 1,274,021m2 Forests 1,921,546m2 13

April 2012 July 2012- June 2013- Process of Decontamination in Tamura City Designated as areas to which evacuation orders are ready to be lifted after the Rearrangement of Evacuation Order Areas Formulation of a decontamination implementation plan Full-scale decontamination work based on the plan was started Decontamination work was completed Aug.-Nov. 2013- Post-decontamination monitoring October 2013 Explanatory meeting to local residents <Reported the result of post-decontamination monitoring of residential houses> February 2014- Explanatory meeting to local residents <Set up an inquiry counter and carried out measurement upon residents requests> April 2014 The evacuation order was lifted Decontamination follow-up 1. Consultation counter for decontamination <Started to measure air dose rate and to check the extent of contamination upon residents requests> 2. Continuous Post-decontamination monitoring 3. Removal of contaminated soil depending on the situation 14

Before & After the Decontamination Work in Tamura City Before Before Before Before After After After After 15

Decontamination Activities in Tamura City Wiping off rooftop and walls Wiping off a gutter High pressure water cleaning of a drain pipe High pressure water cleaning of paved road Mowing and removal of sludge Removal of crushed stones and topsoil, and covering with clean soil 16

0 0 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.15 0.2 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.3 0.3 0.35 0.35 0.4 0.4 0.45 0.45 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.55 0.6 0.6 0.65 0.65 0.7 0.7 0.75 0.75 0.8 0.8 0.85 0.85 0.9 0.9 0.95 0.95 1 1 1.05 1.05 1.1 1.1 1.15 1.15 1.2 1.2 1.25 1.25 1.3 1.3 More それ 以 上 Effect on Decontamination Work in Tamura City 1 Air Dose Rate 1 m above surface Average Figures: 0.34μSv/h Number of Measurement Points Average Figures after the Decontamination: 0.40μSv/h Average Figures before the Decontamination: 0.63μSv/h 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 46% of decrease 37% of decrease Before the decontamination After the decontamination Result of post-decontamination monitoring* *conducted between Sep. Oct. 2013 Air Dose Rate (μsv/h) 17

Decontamination work has reduced air dose rates by approx. 36% for residential houses. The data from the post-decontamination monitoring confirm that the effects of whole-area decontamination have remained and show that air dose rates have been continuously decreasing. 1.0 Air dose rate (μsv/h) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Effects on Decontamination Work in Tamura City 2 Before After 36% reduced Before Post monitoring 45% reduced Before After 25% reduced Before Post monitoring 37% reduced Before After 21% reduced Before Post monitoring 27% reduced Before After 25% reduced Before Post monitoring 39% reduced Before the decontamination After the decontamination Result of postdecontamination monitoring* *conducted between Sep. - Oct., 2013 0.0 Residential houses (n=4,130) Farmlands (n=3,774) Forests close to residential areas (n=3,359) Roads (n=2,250) 18

Effects of Decontamination on Joban Expressway The integrated work of decontamination by MOE and road restoration and construction by East Nippon Expressway Company Limited enabled (i) the decrease in air dose rates, (ii) the minimization of waste, (iii) the shortening of work period, at the same time. Outline of decontamination Zones of decontamination on Joban Expressway Period December 2012 ~ June 2013 Decontamination area Main Decontamination method Areas where air dose rates exceeded 3.8 µsv/h (equivalent to 20 msv/year) on the roads Side slope:weeding (removing vegetation) Road surface:high pressure water jet washing Future site:weeding, Soil mixture, Surface compaction Bridge (handrail, safety fence):wiping out Top soil removal of road surface was omitted for the not-yet-opened areas of the main line. Significant decrease in air dose rates after the integrated work Section (as of June 2012) 13.8 μsv/h< ~ 9.5 μsv/h Target (μsv/h) Average air dose rate at the height of one meter (μsv/h) Before After Oct. 2014 3.8 4.3 2.8 0.9 79% Legend Areas to which evacuation orders are ready to be lifted Areas in which residents are not permitted to live Areas where it is expected that residents will face difficulties in returning for a long time As of Oct. 1, 2014 Opened on April 8, 2012 Opened on Dec. 6, 2014 Opened on March 1, 2015 Re-opened on Feb. 22, 2014 Yamamoto IC Shinchi IC IC Soma IC Minami-Soma Kashima SA Decreasing rate for Oct.2014 to predecontamination Minamisoma IC Decontamination area L=21km Namie IC Joban-Tomioka IC Naraha PA Joban Ban etsu Legend National road Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS 2>9.5 μsv/h 9.5 15.7 9.9 2.3 85% Hirono IC 19

Integrated Work of Decontamination and Road Restoration and Construction The integrated work enabled (i) the decrease in air dose rates, (ii) the minimization of waste, (iii) the shortening of work period, at the same time. A case of separately implementing decontamination and road construction 1. Development of mound 2.Decontamination (removal of topsoil) 3.Construction (roadbed work) 4.Construction (pavement) 1 Decrease radiation dose Through mound modification and shielding with base course material and paving A case of integrated work A case between Joban-Tomioka and Minamisoma 2. Removal of topsoil is skipped 1. Development of mound 2 Reduce waste 3. Construction(roadbed work) including mound modification By substituting mound modification for topsoil removal The volume of generated soil was reduced by 14,000 m 3. 4.Construction (pavement) 3 Shorten work period By substituting mound modification for topsoil removal and close cooperation for process management 20

Basic Structure of a Temporary Storage Site Basic structure of a temporary storage site - A case in Special Decontamination Area - Shielding of radiation by sandbags with shielding effect Prevention of infiltration of leachate to the ground by bottom cover sheets and collection tanks Prevention of ingress of rainwater by covering sheet Monitoring of groundwater for unexpected infiltration Prevention of entrance and access by outsiders, surrounding with fence fence Monitor well Covering sheet (waterproof) a storage container with contaminated soil a shielding-effect sandbag with noncontaminated soil fence Collection tank Bottom cover sheet (impermeable) 21

Safety Management of Temporary Storage Sites - Inspection and Measurement - Contents of Inspection and Measurement in SDA Class Work Item Contents Frequency Normal Situation Once / week Inspection by visual observation To check the damage, deformation, deterioration of important facilities such as sheet, water catchment, fence and signage To provide emergency repair if needed Emergency (unusual weather, etc.) Various measurement Environment maintenance Inspection by visual observation Air dose rate (µsv/h) Once / week Leachate from the inside Radioactive concentration Drainage from collection tank As the occasion demands (essential at drainage) Ground water Radioactive concentration Once / month Mowing, clean-up etc. As the occasion demands Same as in normal situation At the time of rainfall, wind and earthquake exceeding the standards Criteria for unusual weather, etc. (emergency) Phenomenon Standard value Rainfall Exceeding 60 mm/day in the most recent data of Automated Meteorological Data Acquisition System or exceeding the value/s for heavy rain warning in the municipalities concerned Wind velocity Exceeding 20 m/s at maximum in the most recent data of Automated Meteorological Data Acquisition System Earthquake Exceeding the seismic intensity 4 in the municipalities concerned 22

Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 23

Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area 1 Number of municipalities designated as the Intensive Contamination Survey Area: 104 (at the start) 99 (at present) The designation was lifted in five municipalities because of the radiation dose decrease, etc. Municipalities that formulated decontamination implementation plans: 94 municipalities (all that had intended to do) Municipalities that have completed or almost completed their plans (and continued monitoring of air dose rates). 48 municipalities Designation of ICSA lifted Completed based on the plan Municipalities that have formulated decontamination plans based on the Act Other ICSA Inside the orange frame is the SDA Miyagi Iwate Municipalities in process of implementing decontamination based on the plans: 46 municipalities In most of the decontamination plans, ending time period is set between FY2015- FY2016. Fukushima Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS The progress of decontamination In Fukushima Pref. (as of the end of July 2015): Public facilities: approx. 90% Residential houses: approx. 60% Roads: approx. 40% Gunma Tochigi Ibaraki Outside Fukushima Pref. (as of the end of June 2015): Schools & nurseries: almost completed Residential houses: approx. almost completed Roads: approx. 90% Saitama Chiba 24

Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area 2 Decontamination implementation plans were formulated in 94municipalities, and progress has been made (in Fukushima: as of the end of July 2015, other Prefectures: as of the end of June 2015) Number of municipalities Municipalities designated as Intensive Contamination Survey Area Completed Already formulated the plans Almost completed decontamination work in progress No plan at present Fukushima 39 36 3 Iwate 3 2 1 Miyagi 8 4 4 Ibaraki 20 12 7 1 Tochigi 8 4 4 Gunma 10 7 1 1 1 Saitama 2 2 Chiba 9 9 Total 99 19 29 46 5 25

Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area 3 Within Fukushima Prefecture (As of the end of July 2015) Outside Fukushima Pref. (As of the end of June 2015) Ordering Ratio (Number of ordering/number of planning Note: The number of planning areas have been continuously revised Ordering Ratio (Number of Ordering/number of planning) Executing Ratio (Number of actual achievement/number of planning) Public facilities, etc. mostly ordered approx. 90% Residential houses approx. 90% approx. 60% Roads approx. 50% approx. 40% Farmlands & meadows approx. 90% approx. 80% Forests(in living areas) approx. 60% approx. 50% Executing Ratio (Number of actual achievement/number of planning) Schools and nurseries mostly ordered almost completed Park, Sports facilities mostly ordered almost completed Residential houses mostly ordered almost completed Other facilities approx. 80% approx. 80% Roads approx. 90% approx. 90% Farmlands & meadows ordered completed Forests( in living areas) mostly ordered almost completed Note: The number of planning is the total number until the end of June 2015, which might be increased in future depending on each municipality s status. 26

Acceleration of Decontamination and Reconstruction 1 - Interim report of the strategies of the national government and the 4 cities - Background The 4 cities (Fukushima, Koriyama, Soma, Date) requested the national government to accelerate the decontamination and reconstruction and to provide accurate information to lessen public misinterpretation of decontamination targets. The national government and the 4 cities developed together an interim report as their common view of the strategies. What the national government could not correctly convey The long term target of radiation protection is the additional exposure dose of 1 msv/yr. Decontamination is only one of the radiation protection methods. 1 msv/yr is not a limit of exposure or a boundary between safety and danger. The government uses the value of air dose rate 0.23 μsv/h as a criterion to specify the Intensive Contamination Survey Area but does not set it as a goal to be achieved only by decontamination activities. 0.23 μsv/h is a numerical value conservatively estimated based on a hypothetical life pattern. year year Estimated conservatively μsv/h hours outdoors Background radiation μsv/h Depending on patterns of living shielding hours Criterion to specify ICSA μsv/h indoors shielding days 27

Average annual additional exposure dose (msv) Acceleration of Decontamination and Reconstruction 2 - Interim report of the strategies of the national government and the 4 cities New findings - (1) Air dose rate Decontamination and radioactive decay over the past three years have led to decrease air dose rates. (2) Individual exposure dose The level of annual individual additional exposure is about 1 msv for many residents. Individual additional exposure is approx. 1 msv/yr for the residents living in the area where the air dose rate is about 0.3-0.6 μsv/h. Actual exposure dose tends to be lower than that is estimated from the air dose rate. (Based on the estimation, annual additional exposure of 1 msv is converted to air dose rate of 0.23 μsv/h. Correlation between the Average Air Dose Rate and the Average Annual Additional Exposure Dose - Soma City (elementary school pupils) and Date City (0 to 15 years old) - 被 ば 平 く 均 線 年 量 間 ( 追 加 ) msv 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Soma City Date City Estimated values 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 空 間 線 量 率 (μsv/h) Air dose rate (μsv/h) Change of contamination situation (3) Change of contamination situation Contamination tends to be topically concentrated under rain gutters etc. in a garden due to weathering and human activities, and was widespread early on in the incident. Early on Present 28

Acceleration of Decontamination and Reconstruction 3 - Interim report of the strategies of the national government and the 4 cities - Direction of the future strategies (1) Promote radiation protection of the public, focusing on individual exposure dose Enhance activities for radiation protection, focusing on individual exposure dose in areas where decontamination was done as planned. Promote monitoring of individual doses by providing residents with personal dosimeters. (2) Enhance risk communication Convey clearly and deliberately the government policy on decontamination, scientific knowledge about radiation, and new findings on effects of decontamination and relationships between air dose rate and individual exposure dose. Improve officials knowledge about decontamination and the health impacts of radiation. Secure and cultivate human resources who can convey knowledge and ideas of the government and experts. (3) Conduct decontamination effectively, depending on the nature of contamination Determine whether to conduct decontamination and select appropriate measures, depending on the radiation level. Improve effectiveness and efficiency of decontamination activities. (4) Enhance comprehensive policies to secure radiation protection and address anxieties of the public By effectively combining policies of (1)-(3), address people s concern and instill a sense of security. 29

Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 30

Formulation of the Decontamination Guidelines Technical guidelines for carrying out decontamination Developed to complement the Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment Used as reference when contracting decontamination projects Contents 1. Guidelines on the methods of investigating and measuring environmental pollution in intensive survey areas 2. Guidelines pertaining to measures on decontamination 3. Guidelines pertaining to the collection and transportation of the removed soil 4. Guidelines pertaining to the storage of removed soil URL: http://josen.env.go.jp/en/framework/pdf/decontamination_gui delines_2nd.pdf 31

Techniques Used for Decontamination 1 Houses, buildings Removing deposits from the roof, deck, and gutters Wiping off roofs and walls, high-pressure washing etc. Gardens and standing trees Mowing, removing fallen leaves, topsoil stripping etc. Roads Removing deposits in ditches, high-pressure washing etc. Decontaminating roofing tiles (by wiping) Decontaminating paved surfaces (by a collective type high-pressure water cleaner) Decontaminating gardens (by removing soils etc.) Photos provided by: Date City 32

Techniques Used for Decontamination 2 Schoolyards, gardens and parks Stripping soils and topsoil etc. Farmlands Reverse tillage, stripping topsoil etc. Forests and woods Removing fallen leaves and lower twigs, pruning etc. Decontaminating a schoolyard Decontaminating a grass plot Photo provided by: JAEA Decontaminating a forest (by removing fallen leaves) Photo provided by: Japanese Society of Turf grass Science Photo provided by: JAEA 33

Air dose rate *1,2 (Measured at 1m height) Reduction rate (average) of air dose rate *2,3 Example of reduction rate of surface concentration of contamination *4 Summary on Decontamination Effect Effect of decontamination work by national and local governments (Major results) <1μSv/h before decontamination Before decontamination: 0.36-0.93 μsv/h After decontamination: 0.25-0.57 μsv/h 1-3.8μSv/h before decontamination > 3.8μSv/h before decontamination 32% 43% 51% Asphalt-paved roads: 50-70% by washing, 30-70% by high-pressure washing Playground(Soil): 80-90% by stripping off surface-dirt *1: Range from 25 to 75 percentile values of the air dose rate. *2: Data measured at 50cm height in children s living environment are not included. *3: Average reduction rate of the air dose rate for different dose levels before decontamination. (Reduction rate (%)= (1-air dose rate after decontamination / air dose rate before decontamination) x100.) *4: Released in Announcement on 'Effectiveness of decontamination work which is implemented by the national government and relevant municipalities in decontamination project'(jan. 18, 2013) <Original Data> Projects: Mostly, decontamination projects after FY2012 (Projects by national government: 10 municipalities; Projects by municipalities: 90 municipalities in 8 Prefectures) Data measurement term : Roughly from March 2012 to October 2013 Measured item: Air dose rate (measured at 1m and 50cm heights; Unit: μsv/h) Number of data: About 250,000 (A pair of data collected before and after decontamination is counted as one item of data) 34

Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 35

Forestry Agency Decontamination Policies on Forested Areas Area A: Around residential area Area B: Where workers have daily access Area C: Forest in whole Measures to manage proper forestry C Model project for forestry revitalization Research & development of technology to prevent the diffusion of radioactive materials Ministry of the Environment Sharing knowledge Measures to prevent diffusion of radioactive materials from forests to the populated area and to prevent discharges from landslides and to ensure safety and security for the local residents C Trial measures to prevent landslides caused by underground decay Understanding the current status of radioactive material diffusion from the forest Forestry run in deep forests Promote measures with local cooperation Around residential area A Area where people have daily access B Clarification of decontamination policy at mushroom farms B Removal of organic residuals to prevent sediment runoff A Exceptional extension of decontamination area beyond 20 m from the residential place, if a relatively high air dose rate is detected around houses, located at a valley and surrounded with forests A 36

Decontamination Policies on Rivers and Lakes Contaminated sediments in rivers and lakes generally do not impact the air dose rate of the surrounding environment due to the radiation shielding by water. (More than 99% of radiation is shielded at the depth of 1 m). Thus, decontamination will be implemented as necessary only in case that shielding is not effective due to drying up of water, air dose rate is relatively high by the accumulation of radioactive cesium, and there is high-human activity. Decontamination will be implemented only in reservoirs located at residential areas and parks, and only when water is dried up for a certain period of time and the surrounding air dose rate is significantly increased. *Measures for the restart of farming and agricultural reconstruction will be implemented by MAFF. Continuous measures such as food inspection and water inspection at the water treatment plants will be taken. Dam Reservoirs Farmland Lakes Drinking water Food Decontamination will not be implemented because of the watershielding effect that prevents radioactivity from impacting the surrounding environment. River terrace At public facilities such as parks and playgrounds using a part of river beds, where there are many public activities, decontamination will be implemented as a part of the living area as necessary, comparing the air dose rate to that of the surrounding living areas. Continuous monitoring and research & development from the long term perspective will be conducted to comprehend the environmental behavior of radioactive cesium throughout the entire river basin. 37

Follow-up of Decontamination Post-decontamination activities are based on local conditions, types of future land use and current air dose rates and include the following: 1 Confirming retained effects of decontamination / Follow-up decontamination 1) Post-decontamination monitoring Post-decontamination monitoring is implemented for approximately six months to a year after decontamination. 2) Follow-up decontamination If post-decontamination levels do not remain adequately low, an investigation may be conducted and if practicable, follow-up decontamination may take place taking into account rationale and feasibility. If the overall air dose rate remains at acceptable levels, follow-up decontamination will only take place in specific areas as opposed to whole-area, follow-up decontamination. 2 Continuous monitoring Continuous monitoring will be conducted until the decontamination area designation is lifted. 3 Service to residents Radiation monitoring and risk communication will be conducted in hopes to ease anxieties among local residents MOE cooperates with relevant ministries and local governments to measure and manage individual doses, provide health consultations, and more. MOE utilizes individual doses for consideration of the decision rationale, the scope of follow-up decontamination and service to residents, in view of the implementation of measurement and management of individual doses and the long-term individual additional exposure levels. 38

Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 39

What is an Interim Storage Facility (ISF)? In Fukushima Prefecture, large quantities of contaminated soil and waste have been generated from decontamination activities. Currently, it is difficult to clarify methods of final disposal of such soil and waste. Until final disposal becomes available, it is necessary to establish an Interim Storage Facility (ISF) in order to safely manage and store soil and waste. The following materials generated in Fukushima Prefecture will be stored in the ISF. 1. Soil and waste (such as fallen leaves and branches) generated from decontamination activities, which have been stored at the Temporary Storage Sites. * In principle, combustible materials will be incinerated, and incinerated ash will be stored. 2. Incineration ash with radioactive concentration more than 100,000 Bq/kg. 40

Process regarding the Interim Storage Facility TIME Oct. 2011 April 2013- CONTENTS MOE announced the Basic Principles of the roadmap of the Interim Storage Facility (ISF). MOE started the field survey including boring survey, obtaining the consent from the local communities.. Dec. 2013 MOE requested that Fukushima Prefecture and the 3 towns (Futaba, Okuma and Naraha) accept the establishment of the ISF. Feb. 2014 May-June, 2014 Sep. 1, 2014 Sep. 2014 - Oct. - Nov. 2014 Dec.2014-Jan.2015 Feb. 3, 2015 Feb. 8, 2015 Feb. 25, 2015 March, 2015 - The Governor of Fukushima requested the national government to consolidate the ISF in Okuma and Futaba. The Government held explanatory meetings for residents. (16 times in total: 10 times in Fukushima, 6 times outside Fukushima) The Governor of Fukushima accepted the construction of the ISF, and both mayors of Okuma and Futaba agreed that the government would explain to the landowners. At the same time, the Governor asked confirmation of the five conditions of the national government before its acceptance of transportation of soil. MOE held explanatory meetings for landowners (12 times in total: 9 times in Fukushima and 3 times outside Fukushima). The amendment bill for the Japan Environmental Safety Corporation (JESCO) Law in order to legislate the final disposal of contaminated soil and waste outside Fukushima Prefecture was approved by the Cabinet and submitted to the Diet in Oct. The law was enacted in Nov. and put into effect in Dec. Both Okuma and Futaba accepted the construction of the ISF. The construction of stock yards in the ISF started. The Minister of the Environment and the Minister for Reconstruction explained to the Governor of Fukushima the progress related to the five conditions which should be confirmed before the transportation of soil to the ISF. The Governor of Fukushima and both mayors of Okuma and Futaba conveyed the acceptance to the Minister of the Environment and the Minister for Reconstruction. Transportation of soil from temporary storage sites to the stock yards started in Okuma on March 13, in Futaba on March 25, and sequentially in other municipalities. 41

Five Conditions for Commencement of Transportation to ISF Fukushima Prefecture s offers concerning ISF (Sep. 1, 2014) Fukushima Prefecture asks the government for understandable and thorough explanations to the landowners. Although Fukushima Prefecture has already accepted construction of the ISF, it will not accept transportation of soil to the ISF until the following five conditions are met. <1> Enactment of the law for the final disposal outside Fukushima Prefecture <2> Preparation of budget for grants concerning the ISF, etc. with high flexibility <3> Clarification of operation & maintenance of transportation routes and roadside measures <4> Safety on the facility and transportation <5> Safety agreement with Fukushima Prefecture, Okuma town and Futaba town The Minister of the Environment and the Minister for Reconstruction explained to the Governor of Fukushima the progress on the five conditions (Feb. 8, 2015) The Governor and the mayors of Okuma and Futaba accepted transportation (Feb. 25, 2015) 42

Planned Site for the Interim Storage Facility SDA ICSA Former ICSA ICSA without decontamination plan ( ) Fukushima Prefecture Futaba Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS Okuma 43

(m 3 ) 10mil. Estimated Volume in the Interim Storage Facility Estimated volume of generated soil, etc. from decontamination work (in case of 22 million m3) It is estimated that generated soil from decontamination will be approx. 16 ~22 mil. m 3 after the volume reduction (incineration) 5mil. approx. 10.06 mil. m 3 approx. 10.35 mil. m 3 ref. : approximately 13~18 times as much as the volume of Tokyo Dome (1.24 mil. m 3 ) approx. 1.55 mil. m 3 In considering the plan for the Interim Storage Facility, storage of products whose volume is difficult to estimate at this moment is taken into account. 0.01 mil. Soil with less than 8,000Bq/kg Soil with 8,000~ 100,000Bq/kg approx. 10,000 m 3 Soil with more than 100,000Bq/kg Incineration ash from decontamination waste approx. 20,000 m 3 Wastes with more than 100,000Bq/kg within countermeasure area 44

Facilities and Disposal Process at the Interim Storage Facility The Interim Storage Facility will consist of several facilities with various functions. Temporary Storage Sites, etc. Soil Storage Facility To store soils after separation by radioactive cesium concentrations and other features Image Acceptance & Separation Facility To separate the soil and waste transported by measuring the weight and radiation dose. Image Acceptance Separation Volume Reduction Facility To reduce the volume of stockpile by incinerating the combustibles (branches and plants, etc.) Image Other Facilities Screening Water treatment Stock yard Admin. Office R&D Waste Storage Facility To store waste (incineration ash, etc.) measuring more than 100,000 Bq/kg Image 45

1. Basic principles of transportation Basic Plan for Transportation of Soil to the ISF (1) Safe and Secure (2) In a short period of time and in smooth manner (3) Under the cooperation with the public and relevant organization 2. Basic items of transportaion (1) Object of transportation (2) Role-sharing between the national government and municipalities (3) Means of transportation etc. (4) Current and future situation of road traffic 3. Basic policy on transportation (1) Implementation of integrated management (2) Smooth transportation that contributes to the reconstruction of the whole Fukushima Prefecture (3) Securement of residents safety and minimization of environmental impacts (4) Positive use of expressway (5) Intensive transportation and use of large-sized vehicles (6) Taking all measures to prevent accidents and limit possible damage (7) Implementation of monitoring and provision of information to the public (8) Development of public understanding 4. Measures for implementation of transportation (1) Development of implementation plan for transportation (2) Role-sharing of transportation (3) Strengthening of cooperation among relevant organizations (4) Conducting of pilot transportation (5) Road and traffic measures (6) Education and training of drivers and worker etc. 46

Transportation to the ISF (Pilot Transportation) Pilot transportation is implemented for about a year in order to confirm safe and secure transport towards full-scale transportation of a large quantity of removed soil From the start of pilot transportation, MOE conducts management of whole targeted materials, traffic management (transportation vehicles) and monitoring survey to implement safely and steadily By pilot transportation, approx. 1,000 m3 of removed soil will be transported from each relevant municipality, depending on each specific situation Formulation of traffic operation plan Before implementing transportation, MOE makes sufficient adjustment with the relevant municipalities and provide education and trainings to drivers and so on. Route setting Transport route is set beforehand, making use of express highways. Loading Extra care is taken for the surrounding environment by loading and securing the packaging so it does not scatter or leak. Transportation During the delivery, transport objects and location will be monitored. Response to accidents A system shall be established in case of an accident, to be thoroughly prepared and for proper response. Monitoring survey Impacts on the living environment and of radiation doses due to transportation are monitored and will be publicly announced. MOE is preparing for full-scale transportation through implementation and review of the pilot transportation 47

Amendment Bill, necessary for ISF facilitation, etc. (Overview of Amendment Bill for JESCO Law) The government will take full responsibility to maintain and manage the ISF, which is an indispensable facility for decontamination and reconstruction in Fukushima The government will set the necessary rules for utilizing JESCO (invested 100% by the government) as a specialized institution, of which the government has the strong guidance and supervision authority Name of the company and law 1. The name of the company shall be changed to JESCO (Japan Environmental Storage & Safety Corporation) 2. The name of the law shall be changed to the JESCO (Japan Environmental Storage & Safety Corporation) Law Government s Responsibility 1. The government will build interim storage facilities, and ensure safety 2. The government will take necessary measures to gain understanding and cooperation from residents living in the vicinity of the interim storage facilities, and other stakeholders 3. The government will take necessary measures to complete final disposal outside of the Fukushima Prefecture within 30 years from the start of transfer to the interim storage facilities Scope of Business Operations The company shall operate the ISF on consignment from the government, Fukushima Prefecture and relevant municipalities, etc., and others specified by Ministry order < will be implementing the disposal of PCB wastes continuously> Government s stocks, investment and taxation exceptions 1. The government shall own the total number of outstanding stocks (the original law defined more than half of stocks owned by the government. However the government owns all stocks) 2. Additional investment by the government 3. Exclusion from taxation of registration license tax concerning the registration of increased capital stock with additional investment Legally required measures, such as sectionalized accounting, may be implemented This law is implemented on the day specified by the government ordinance within two months from the date of promulgation (Dec. 24, 2014) with some exceptions 48

Pilot Transportation / Storage at Stock Yards Pilot Transportation from TSS < As of Sep. 14 > Commencement Completion Okuma March 13 April 7 Tamura April 10 May 25 Tomioka May 26 June 6 Kawauchi June 8 July 10 Hirono June 22 July 10 Tanakura July 18 Aug. 4 Asakawa Aug. 19 Aug. 28 Iwaki Sep. 1 Aizu-misato Sep. 8 Futaba March 25 April 14 Namie June 23 Aug. 4 Katsurao June 26 Aug. 6 Naraha June 30 Koriyama July 27 Sep. 9 To Okuma stock yard To Futaba stock yard Screening of Trucks Surface doses of all the trucks from the stock yards have been screened and below the standard (13,000 cpm). Storage at Stock Yards <Volume of storage at stock yards(as of Sep. 8)> In Okuma: 7,611 m 3 In Futaba: 5,402 m 3 * Calculated on the assumption that the volume of a large bag is one m 3. <Air dose rates at the stock yards> No significant change in dose rates before and after transportation * Air dose rates at the stock yards are In Okuma: about 1 9 μsv/h In Futaba: about 1 4 μsv/h Transportation operations from Minami-Daira TSS in Okuma town Installation operations to the stock yard in Okuma town 49

Steps for Final Disposal outside Fukushima Prefecture within 30 years from the start of the ISF Final disposal will be processed outside Fukushima Prefecture in accordance with 8 steps Collecting information widely and considering physical attenuation of radiation in the process, MOE will undertake: 1research and develop technology 2study of a direction of the final disposal taking into account the possibility of volume reduction and recycling MOE will develop national public understanding through dissemination of information concerning reuse of low radioactive materials and the final disposal outside Fukushima Prefecture < 8 steps towards the final disposal > STEP1: Comprehension of trends in research & development at home and abroad Start of ISF STEP 1 30 years from the start of ISF Timeline STEP2: Studying the direction of future research & development STEP3: Furthering research & development STEP4: Studying the direction of the final disposal including consideration of possibilities of volume reduction and recycling STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP5: Investigation, review and adjustment concerning final disposal sites STEP6: Land preparation of final disposal sites STEP7: Installation of soil and wastes to final disposal sites STEP8: Completion of final disposal Taking soil and wastes out of the facility through volume reduction and recycling Development of national public understanding of STEP 5 final disposal outside Fukushima Prefecture STEP 6 STEP 7 STEP 8 50

Technology Development of Volume Reduction and Recycling The government implements the projects on soil volume reduction and recycling, etc. in order to prepare for final disposal outside of Fukushima Prefecture within 30 years after the start of the ISF. Investigation for formulation of technology development strategy A committee consisted of experts will be established and implements ( 1) to collect information and verify the latest technologies here and abroad (2) to manage the progress of the projects listed below (3) to formulate a strategy for technology development including targets and scenarios. R&D and verification directly-managed by the government For the early realization of volume reduction and recycling, following projects will be implemented by small scaled classification plants*: (1) Performance evaluation of plants (2) various tests of soil behavior after treatment and concentrated residual substances (3) demonstration application of soil as cover-soil material and construction material Plant for soil classification (*) Classification: A technology used to separate small clay from excavated soil by polishing and cleaning based on the cesium properties for adhering to small clay. Investigation for promoting of recycling For exploitation of application of soil with lowlevel contamination to construction, the following will be studied by MOE in cooperation with research institutions of the relevant ministries and the federation of construction contractors: (1) demand trends for civil engineering materials (2) assessment of required quality and safety for various purposes (3) strategy for promoting recycling of soil Examples of recycling (left: roadbed material right: core of breakwater)

Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 52

Cooperation with International Societies 1 To effectively conduct unprecedented off-site cleanup, MOE has asked and been given advice and evaluation from international and expert points of view. It has also actively shared its experiences with the international community. IAEA International Mission In response to the request made by the Government of Japan, IAEA conducted an International Mission to Japan in Oct. 2011 and Oct. 2013 (as a follow-up mission of 2011) to provide assistance to Japan in assessing the progress made with the remediation, to review remediation strategies, and to share its findings with the international community as lessons learned. Evaluation and advice from the follow-up mission of 2013 Evaluation Japan has achieved good progress in the remediation activities. The team found significant progress in the institutional arrangements, many examples of good practice in stakeholder involvement, a practical option for remediation of forests, development and implementation of TSS, establishment of ISF, and implementation of incineration for volume reduction of contaminated material. Advice Japanese institutions are encouraged to increase efforts to communicate that in remediation situations, any level of individual radiation dose in the range of 1 to 20 msv per year is acceptable in line with the international standards and with the recommendations from the relevant international organisations, that 1mSv/y is a long-term goal and it cannot be achieved in a short time solely by decontamination work. The appropriate application of the optimisation principle in a remediation strategy, and its practical implementation, requires a balance of all factors that influence the situation, with the aim of obtaining the maximum benefit for the health and safety of the people affected. Communicating the entire remediation and reconstruction programmes and how the various components interact (e.g. tradeoffs between reducing exposure and increasing waste volumes) could reduce uncertainties and provide greater confidence in the decisions being made. There needs to be a continued movement towards the use of the individual doses, as measured with personal dosimeters to support remediation decisions. Continuing the optimization of the remediation of forest areas by concentrating efforts in areas that bring greatest benefit in reducing doses to the public and avoiding damage to the ecological functioning of the forest is recommended. It is encouraged that the responsible organisation(s) to carry out appropriate demonstrations of the safety of the facilities and activities for the management of contaminated materials, in particular for long-term activities, and to allow for their independent evaluation. 53

Cooperation with International Societies 2 Information exchange through bilateral frameworks (U.S., France, UK, etc.) and international organisations (IAEA, OECD/NEA, etc.) MOE has exchanged information among policy makers and experts, concerning decontamination policy, methods, and research for the environmental behavior of radioactive materials and utilized shared knowledge and information to review and implement its decontamination activities. Activity cases of the Working Group on Decommissioning and Environmental Management under the US-Japan Bilateral Committee on Civil Nuclear Cooperation (1) Experts from DOE and EPA of U.S. (February-March, 2013) MOE hosted three U.S. experts and shared information on decontamination policies. It utilized their advice on radiation protection, decontamination methods, waste & soil management based on their experience and professional knowledge (2) U.S. Japan workshop (July 2013) Government officials and researchers from Japan and abroad shared information about research on cesium behavior and stakeholder communication. MOE reported at the Environmental Remediation Study Meeting and utilized shared information to improve its decontamination policies. Dissemination of information abroad Dissemination of information using the decontamination information web-site and the Decontamination Information Plaza Provision of accurate information to embassies and foreign media Development of the Decontamination Report 54

Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 55

WEB Comprehensive and instantaneous information Public Communication Pamphlets and other materials Easy-to-understand and detailed information Distributed at meetings, workshops, city offices, banks, convenience stores, etc. Available on the Web Newspaper ads and TV programs Media is the largest information source for people in FP Decontamination Information Plaza Information hub of decontamination run by MOE and FP (located near the Fukushima Station) Providing people inside and outside of FP and municipalities with comprehensive and latest information of decontamination and radiation Interactive exhibition, demonstration, and workshops Dispatch of experts to municipalities, communities, schools, etc. 56

Outline 1. Policy Framework 2. Progress in Special Decontamination Area (directly conducted by the Government) 3. Progress in Intensive Contamination Survey Area (conducted by the municipalities) 4. Decontamination Technology 5. Decontamination Policies based on Studies regarding Radioactive Cesium Behavior 6. Interim Storage Facility 7. Cooperation with International Societies 8. Public Communication 9. Decontamination Report 57

Decontamination Report MOE developed the Decontamination Report, a comprehensive report regarding the basic policies and framework of decontamination, contractors experience on project management, applicable conditions and effects of actual decontamination technologies, in March 2014. MOE aims to convey the experience of decontamination and lessons learned both domestically and internationally and to contribute to improvement of decontamination through compiling the information. Table of contents 1. The basic features of off-site decontamination in Japan 2. Overview of decontamination procedures 3. Management and treatment of decontamination soil and waste 4. Management of decontamination project 5. Effects of decontamination 6. Overview, usage and applicable conditions, and verification of effects of decontamination technologies The report is available on the MOE decontamination web-site (in Japanese): http://josen.env.go.jp/material/pdf/report_on_decontamination_h26.pdf English version will be coming soon and be provided for policy makers and experts in the world, in cooperation with IAEA. 58