How To Help Mentally Ill Offenders In The Criminal Justice System



Similar documents
Austin Travis County Integral Care Jail Diversion Programs and Strategies

External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015

WHAT IS THE ILLINOIS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND HOW DID IT START? MISSION STATEMENT

Mental Health Court 101

Marin County s STAR Program: Support and Treatment for Mentally Ill Offenders

How To Fund A Mental Health Court

AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:

Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System. Ashley Rogers, M.A. LPC

SPECIAL OPTIONS SERVICES PROGRAM UNITED STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

New Developments in Supported Employment San Francisco Behavioral Health Court

Mental Health Courts: Solving Criminal Justice Problems or Perpetuating Criminal Justice Involvement?

ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CRIMINAL MENTAL HEALTH PROJECT Program Summary. Impact to the Community

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013

Utah s Voice on Mental Illness

SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency.

COPE Collaborative Opportunities for Positive Experiences

Georgia Accountability Court Adult Felony Drug Court. Policy and Procedure Manual

Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

Reform of the Rockefeller Drug Laws and the Impact on Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice 101 and the Affordable Care Act. Prepared by: Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition

How To Run A Diversion Program In Connecticut

Diversion Guidelines. Hennepin County Attorney s Office

GETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

REVIEW OF SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS WHO ARE RESISTANT TO TREATMENT

Building A Reformed Criminal Justice System: The Sequential Intercept Model

Pierce County. Drug Court. Established September 2004

PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007

A Guide to Special Sessions & Diversionary Programs in Connecticut. Superior Court Criminal Division

Outcomes for People on Allegheny County Community Treatment Teams

Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code.

CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE. André de Gruy Capital Defender

Office of the Bexar County Criminal District Attorney

THINKING ABOUT CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM By Daniel T. Satterberg

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations

Jail Diversion & Behavioral Health

DeKalb County Drug Court: C.L.E.A.N. Program (Choosing Life and Ending Abuse Now)

Clinical Skills for Evidence-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Practices with Offenders. Treatment of Co-Occurring Disorders

court. However, without your testimony the defendant might go unpunished.

Mission: To provide early intervention, prevention, and diversion services to first

64th Legislature AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE

Community Corrections

It s time to shift gears on criminal justice VOTER

Appendix I. Thurston County Criminal Justice Treatment Account Plan

Program Guidelines and Procedures for Adult Transitional Case Management

Planning Grant Training February 20, 2015

Offender Screening. Oklahoma Department of Mental health and Substance Abuse Services

Commission on Alternatives to Incarceration

Mental Health & Addiction Forensics Treatment

Introduction. 1 P age

(2) If you have no other information regarding his mental illness, you might contact the county mental health coordinator at

How To Participate In A Drug Court

Youth and the Law. Presented by The Crime Prevention Unit

California s Alternative Sentencing Law for Veterans and Members of the U.S. Military

An Analysis of Idaho s Kootenai County DUI Court

King County Drug Court Program Profile

Financing Systems: Leveraging Funds to Support a Comprehensive Program

Participant Handbook

Adult Criminal Justice Case Processing in Washington, DC

Most states juvenile justice systems have

ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act.

MANDATORY SUPERVISION COURT: Blueprint for Success

How To Save Money On Drug Sentencing In Michigan

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

Section IV Adult Mental Health Court Treatment Standards

A Guide to Understanding the Juvenile Justice System

Report on Adult Drug Court: eligibility, procedure, and funding Prepared for the State of Rhode Island General Assembly revised April 26, 2007

KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

In October 2013, the leadership of Franklin County s justice and behavioral health systems including

(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *

POTTER, RANDALL AND ARMSTRONG COUNTIES DRUG COURT: A VIABLE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCE

Governor Jennifer M. Granholm,

Adult Mental Health Court Certification Application

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process

GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines

Federal Purpose Area 5 Drug Treatment Programs

Mental Illness, Addiction and the Whatcom County Jail

2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill:

BANNOCK COUNTY JUVENILE JUSTICE CLASSES AND PROGRAMS SUMMARY

Stopping the Revolving Door for Mentally Ill Offenders in the Criminal Justice System via Diversion and Re-entry Programs

In many jurisdictions, state and local government

BRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY

Statistics on Women in the Justice System. January, 2014

NCJA Conference. Focusing on the Mentally Ill: Pre-Trial Diversion, Assessment and Treatment

CORRELATES AND COSTS

Using Data to Inform Evidence-Based Decision Making. January 8, 2013

SKAGIT COUNTY ADULT FELONY DRUG COURT

TRAVIS COUNTY DWI COURT JUDGE ELISABETH EARLE, PRESIDING

Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders. Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders. Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators

Transcription:

Mentally Ill Offenders in the Criminal Justice System Webinar Panelists: Hon. Michael Finkle King County District Court Judge Seattle, WA Bradley Jacobs Deputy Director, Adult Behavioral Health Services Center for Alternative Sentencing & Employment Services New York, New York Webinar Facilatator: Robert Hood Director, Community Prosecution & Violent Crimes Div. Association of Prosecuting Attorneys

Seattle Municipal Mental Health Court (MHC) and King County District Regional Mental Health Court (RMHC) Hon. Michael Finkle

General Description of Seattle Municipal MHC and King County District RMHC Specialized problem-solving court calendars for offenders whose mental illness caused/or is related to their alleged criminal conduct. Hear misdemeanor cases involving approx. 900 mentally ill offenders each year. Court held Mon.-Fri. (Seattle) and Tues.-Fri. (King County) Competency Court component all non-felony competency cases heard in MHC/RMHC

History of Seattle Municipal MHC and King County District RMHC 1997 tragic incident was impetus for reevaluating how courts and police dealt with mentally ill offenders Statewide Mentally Ill Offender Task Force convened Task Force recommends forming MHCs King County District MHC opens in Feb. 1999 (2 nd in the country); expands to Regional RMHC Jan. 2010 Seattle Municipal MHC opens in Mar. 1999 (fourth in the country)

Goals of Seattle Municipal MHC and King County District RMHC Protect public safety, Reduce the use of jail and repeated interaction with the criminal justice system for mentally ill offenders, Connect, or re-connect mentally ill offenders with needed mental health services, Improve likelihood of ongoing treatment success, access to housing, and linkages with other critical support.

Critical Elements Team-oriented approach with new view of traditional roles Early intervention Opt in process Assessment & information sharing Emphasis on defendant based outcomes that reduce liklihood of reoffense & reincarceration

Teams Within Seattle Municipal MHC and King County District RMHC Consistency in assignment is key Regularly assigned judge Regularly assigned prosecutor Regularly assigned defense attorney Regularly assigned defense social worker Regularly assigned mental health professional (Court Liaison or Court Monitor)--court contracts for the services Regularly assigned probation staff with mental health training

Referrals to Seattle Municipal MHC and King County District RMHC Can be made by: Judges Public Defenders Private Defense Attorneys Prosecutors Jail staff Police PR Screeners MHC flag in court s RMS (Seattle only)

Defendant Outcomes Reduced charges, reduced or deferred sentences, or case dismissals (successful diversion) Reduced recidivism Increased social services contacts during program Increased social services contacts after graduation Housing

Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment New York County Alternatives to Incarceration Program Bradley Jacobs Deputy Director, Behavioral Health Programs

Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Mission is to increase the understanding and use of community sanctions that are fair, affordable, and consistent with public safety Youth ATI Services Adult Behavioral Health ATI Services Felony Programs Misdemeanor Programs

Program Overview Nathaniel Project Enrolled first client January 2000 Converted to Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) team licensed by New York State Office of Mental Health June 2003

Program Overview Who We Serve Clinical Criteria Adults Severe and Persistent Mental Illness Co-occurring Substance Use Disorder Eligible for ACT services in NYC 1 psych. hospitalization 90-days or more 4 psychiatric ER visits 4 psychiatric inpatient admissions

Program Overview Who We Serve Legal Criteria Convicted Felony (violent & non-violent) At risk of prison sentence Federal study found no empirical evidence showing more negative outcomes when people with violent charges are diverted (Naples & Steadman, 2003)

Program Overview Non-Specialized Court Diversion Program Participants monitored by Supreme Court Justices 12-24 months 15 judges on average monitoring cases Sentencing is deferred Sentence determined by legal history Felony & Misdemeanor Probation (16%) Misd. conviction 1-year conditional discharge Felony conviction 3-year conditional discharge Dismissal

Assertive Community Treatment Evidence-Based Practice Combines treatment, rehabilitation, social supports in a self contained team Effectiveness Reduces use of hospitals Improves housing stability ACT or FACT Goal to prevent arrest and incarceration All participants have criminal justice histories

Program Overview Staffing Standard ACT Lines Program Director/Team Leader Psychiatrist Nurses RN & LPN Family Specialist (MSW) Employment Specialist (MSW) Substance Abuse Specialist (CASAC) Housing Specialist Social Worker Peer Specialist Added Staff Lines Housing Specialist Housing Peer Specialist Supported Employment Coordinator Intake Specialist Court Liaison Specialist Integrated Housing Program Case Manager

ACT Program Services Multidisciplinary Team Approach 68 participants No caseloads Participants have contact with all staff Participants have contact with all staff In vivo community treatment Available 24 hours/day, 7 days/week Engaging and retaining participants high priority No drop policy Low participant to staff ratio Increase and decrease frequency treatment based on daily review of participant s status

ACT Program Services Transdisciplenary Team Approach Medication Support Service Planning & Coordination Integrated Treatment for Substance Abuse Housing Services Health Money Management & Entitlements Daily Activities Wellness Self-Management & Relapse Prevention School & Training Opportunities Work Opportunities Family Life and Social Relationships Empowerment & Self Help

ATI Core Services Screening, Advocacy and Intake Criminal Justice Liaison Community Supervision Risk Assessment - Dangerousness and Suicidality Risk Assessment - Criminal Recidivism Cognitive Behavioral Interventions Integrated Dual Disorder Treatment Supported Employment Services Nathaniel Supported Housing Program Supported Housing (scattered-site apartments)

Finding Target Population Intake Specialist coordinates program admissions 28 percent of defendants screened are admitted to program (2010) 95 percent of defendants are in jail when screened for program admission In 2010-30 percent found incompetent to stand trial after arrest

Finding Target Population (2010) Referral Source N=206 Referrals N=58 Admissions Defense 59% 64% Prosecutor 19% 14% Kirby Forensic 15% 13% Mental Health 7% 9%

Consumer Characteristics Average Age 43 Male 84% African American 60% Latino 23% Caucasian 13% Schizophrenia 79% Bipolar Disorder 16% Substance use disorder 84% Medical problem 53% Homeless 63% AOT 19%

Substance Abuse 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Substance Abuse CASES Coexisting Substance Abuse 82% NYC Coexisting Substance Abuse 54%

High Use of Psychiatric Hospitalizations 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Psyc Hospital in Percent CASES High use of PSYC Hospitals 64% NYC High use of PSYC Hospitals 59%

Legal Characteristics Top 10 Convictions Assault 2nd Degree Criminal Sale Of A Controlled Substance 3rd Degree Robbery 2nd Degree Robbery 3rd Degree Burglary 3rd Degree Grand Larceny 4th Degree Burglary 2nd Degree Criminal Contempt 1st Degree Criminal Possession Of A Weapon 3rd Degree Criminal Possession Of A Controlled Substance 3rd Degree

Case Study 47 year old White male Arrested June 2007- Falsely reporting bomb to ABC news anchor Admitted to forensic hospital Dec 2007 Screened at forensic hospital June 2008 Two days in jail after restoration of competency admitted to ACT team August 2008 No hospital admissions or arrests since ACT enrollment Lives in Apartment Treatment Program Case dismissed in August 2011

Outcomes Employment & Education Activity 12% 10% 10.3% 8% 6% 6.1% 4% 2% 0% 1.7% 3.4% Nathaniel ACT Competitive Employment 1.1% 2.4% NYC ACT Competitive Employment 0.0% Nathaniel ACT Educational Activity 3.4% NYC ACT Educational Activity N = 58 N = 2459 N = 58 N = 2431 Baseline Follow-up

Outcomes Psychiatric Hospitalization

Change in Homelessness 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% Baseline Follow-up 0.00% % Change -20.00% -40.00% -60.00% -80.00% CASES Homelessness NYC Homelessness Baseline 73.30% 11.70% Follow -up 22.20% 4.80% % Change -69.71% -58.70%

Public Safety - Recidivism 158 participants 64% decrease in arrests 2 years post admission (compared to 2 years pre-admission) Probation Sentence 64% decrease CD, Time served, Dismissal 63%

Public Safety - Recidivism 124 participants 56 violent felony admissions 1 post violent arrest (no conviction) 66 non-violent felony admissions 0 post violent arrests 2 misdemeanor admissions 0 arrests

Recidivism Criminal History Percent Decrease from Baseline Arrest Rate Baseline Arrests % Decrease 1 95% 2 9 80% 10 19 50% 20 29 67% 30+ 55%

Completion of Nathaniel ACT 58% successfully complete ATI (2011) 22% sentenced prison; 9% jail 3% deceased 6% transferred to alternative treatment

Completion and Discharge Average length of stay is 2 years 8 months for program graduates Participants receive services with team after they complete legal case, discharge is based on clinical factors Majority transferred to clinic services and stepped down to ICM.

Partners Participant Defense Attorney Prosecutor Judge Victim Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center Assisted Outpatient Treatment Family and significant others

Who Pays for Services Blended MH & CJ Funding ACT Medicaid NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Forensic in ACT Mayor s Office of Criminal Justice Coordinator NYC Council NYS Division of Probation & Correctional Alternatives NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services Frank E. Clark Charitable Trust

Licensing & Contract Partners Oversight of Program Services New York State Office of Mental Health NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Mayor s Office of Criminal Justice Coordinator NYS Office of Probation & Correctional Alternatives NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services

Challenges Staffing resources needed to find appropriate participants and provide services Improve MH and CJ systems collaboration and understanding Resources to integrate CBT into treatment delivery Access to appropriate supportive housing Employment opportunities for participants Blended funding Addressing dual agency role of clinicians

Future Better understanding of non-completions Enhance interventions that address criminogenic risk Enhance services around substance abuse, employment, education, housing, social supports and maladaptive thinking (CBT) Impact of ACA/Health Care Reform on Mental Health Treatment for those in the Criminal Justice System

Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment New York County Alternatives to Incarceration Program Contact Information bjacobs@cases.org (212) 732-0076 www.cases.org Bradley Jacobs Deputy Director, Behavioral Health Programs

Thank you for attending today s webinar

NOTICE OF FEDERAL FUNDING & FEDERAL DISCLAIMER This webinar was supported by Grant No. 2009-DG-BX- K101 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the SMART Office, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this webinar are those of the presenters and do not represent the official position or policies of the United States Department of Justice.