Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet



Similar documents
HOW TO TEST 10 GIGABIT ETHERNET PERFORMANCE

APPLICATION NOTE 183 RFC 2544: HOW IT HELPS QUALIFY A CARRIER ETHERNET NETWORK. Telecom Test and Measurement. What is RFC 2544?

Ethernet A Survey on its Fields of Application

Using & Offering Wholesale Ethernet Network and Operational Considerations

Voice Over IP Performance Assurance

MOST and AVB. Two Candidates for Next Generation Automotive Infotainment Networks. MOST Forum 2013 Esslingen April 23 rd 2013

Three Key Design Considerations of IP Video Surveillance Systems

Customer White paper. SmartTester. Delivering SLA Activation and Performance Testing. November 2012 Author Luc-Yves Pagal-Vinette

Joint ITU-T/IEEE Workshop on Next Generation Optical Access Systems. DBA & QoS on the PON - Commonalities with Switching & Routing

Analysis of IP Network for different Quality of Service

Performance Study of an In-Car Switched Ethernet Network without Prioritization

Testing Challenges for Modern Networks Built Using SDN and OpenFlow

OSI Layers in Automotive Networks

diversifeye Application Note

What is VLAN Routing?

Using Wireless Mesh Networks for Video Surveillance Version: 1. Using Wireless Mesh Networks for Video Surveillance

Can PowerConnect Switches Be Used in VoIP Deployments?

RFC 2544 Testing of Ethernet Services in Telecom Networks

AVB Basics... 4 WHITE PAPER. Choosing AVB or CobraNet... 8

QoS Parameters. Quality of Service in the Internet. Traffic Shaping: Congestion Control. Keeping the QoS

enetworks TM IP Quality of Service B.1 Overview of IP Prioritization

This topic lists the key mechanisms use to implement QoS in an IP network.

Quality of Service in the Internet. QoS Parameters. Keeping the QoS. Traffic Shaping: Leaky Bucket Algorithm

Improving Quality of Service

Testing Packet Switched Network Performance of Mobile Wireless Networks IxChariot

convergence: preparing the enterprise network

IVCi s IntelliNet SM Network

APPLICATION NOTE 209 QUALITY OF SERVICE: KEY CONCEPTS AND TESTING NEEDS. Quality of Service Drivers. Why Test Quality of Service?

Introduction to Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and HP-UX IPQoS

The need for bandwidth management and QoS control when using public or shared networks for disaster relief work

Voice Over IP. MultiFlow IP Phone # 3071 Subnet # Subnet Mask IP address Telephone.

Quality of Service (QoS) on Netgear switches

IEEE Congestion Management Presentation for IEEE Congestion Management Study Group

Guidebook to MEF Certification

How To Provide Qos Based Routing In The Internet

THE INS AND OUTS OF CLOUD COMPUTING

VoIP QoS. Version 1.0. September 4, AdvancedVoIP.com. Phone:

Transport for Enterprise VoIP Services

Quality of Service Analysis of site to site for IPSec VPNs for realtime multimedia traffic.

EBERSPÄCHER ELECTRONICS automotive bus systems

Enhanced Transmission Selection

Voice Over IP - Is your Network Ready?

Receiving the IP packets Decoding of the packets Digital-to-analog conversion which reproduces the original voice stream

Juniper Networks EX Series Ethernet Switches/ Cisco VoIP Interoperability Test Results. September 25, 2009

Service Definition. Internet Service. Introduction. Product Overview. Service Specification

Service Assurance Tools

CPNI VIEWPOINT 03/2007 HOSTED VOICE OVER IP

Advanced Internetworking

VXLAN: Scaling Data Center Capacity. White Paper

QoS Switching. Two Related Areas to Cover (1) Switched IP Forwarding (2) 802.1Q (Virtual LANs) and 802.1p (GARP/Priorities)

Testing VoIP on MPLS Networks

Welcome. People Power Partnership PROFIdag 2013 Peter Van Passen Sales & Business Development Manager HARTING Electric 1/44

Application Note How To Determine Bandwidth Requirements

L2 Box. Layer 2 Network encryption Verifiably secure, simple, fast.

12 Quality of Service (QoS)

MS Series: VolP Deployment Guide

Network Performance Optimisation: The Technical Analytics Understood Mike Gold VP Sales, Europe, Russia and Israel Comtech EF Data May 2013

VLAN for DekTec Network Adapters

ICTTEN6172A Design and configure an IP- MPLS network with virtual private network tunnelling

WHY CHOOSE COX BUSINESS FOR YOUR COMPANY S NETWORK SERVICE NEEDS?

ADTRAN NetVanta 5660

CPNI VIEWPOINT 01/2007 INTERNET VOICE OVER IP

Carrier Class Transport Network Technologies: Summary of Initial Research

EE4367 Telecom. Switching & Transmission. Prof. Murat Torlak

Security and the Mitel Teleworker Solution

The Future of Media Networking. WHITE PAPER Evolving networks to Audio Video Bridging (AVB)

Troubleshooting Common Issues in VoIP

Performance of voice and video conferencing over ATM and Gigabit Ethernet backbone networks

Network Considerations for IP Video

TECHNICAL CHALLENGES OF VoIP BYPASS

RoCE vs. iwarp Competitive Analysis

SLA verification + QoS control: the base for successful VoIP & IPTV deployments

Fundamentals of MPLS for Broadcast Applications

AVnu Alliance White Paper AVB for Professional A/V Use. Author. Contributors. Executive Summary. Rick Kreifeldt

A Guide to Simple IP Camera Deployment Using ZyXEL Bandwidth Solutions

PART II. OPS-based metro area networks

Software Stacks for Mixed-critical Applications: Consolidating IEEE AVB and Time-triggered Ethernet in Next-generation Automotive Electronics

5. DEPLOYMENT ISSUES Having described the fundamentals of VoIP and underlying IP infrastructure, let s address deployment issues.

Application Note. Pre-Deployment and Network Readiness Assessment Is Essential. Types of VoIP Performance Problems. Contents

MAC Address Issues in IEEE 802.1

How To Switch In Sonicos Enhanced (Sonicwall) On A 2400Mmi 2400Mm2 (Solarwall Nametra) (Soulwall 2400Mm1) (Network) (

Welcome. People Power Partnership PROFIdag 2013 Peter Van Passen System Application Manager HARTING nv 1/22

Application Notes. Introduction. Contents. Managing IP Centrex & Hosted PBX Services. Series. VoIP Performance Management. Overview.

CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks. Internet QoS. Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE

WAN and VPN Solutions:

July, Figure 1. Intuitive, user-friendly web-based (HTML) interface.

AN OVERVIEW OF QUALITY OF SERVICE COMPUTER NETWORK

Management of Telecommunication Networks. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Tsenov

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR QUALITY OF SERVICE IN VOICE OVER IP

Can PowerConnect Switches Be Used in IP Multicast Networks?

WHITEPAPER MPLS: Key Factors to Consider When Selecting Your MPLS Provider

Understanding Latency in IP Telephony

STANDPOINT FOR QUALITY-OF-SERVICE MEASUREMENT

NComputing L-Series LAN Deployment

VoIP / SIP Planning and Disclosure

THE IMPORTANCE OF TESTING TCP PERFORMANCE IN CARRIER ETHERNET NETWORKS

Quality of Service. Traditional Nonconverged Network. Traditional data traffic characteristics:

Comparison of Voice over IP with circuit switching techniques

hp ProLiant network adapter teaming

UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS ETHERNET SERVICES

Transcription:

White Paper Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet Key Elements for an Automotive-Specific Ethernet Test Regime www.spirent.com

Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet SPIRENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................. 1 Ethernet/IP performance testing in IT and Telecommunications.................... 2 Throughput, Delay, Jitter, Packet-Loss, Packet out of order................... 2 Switch Benchmarking........................................ 2 Quality of Service.......................................... 3 Synchronisation........................................... 3 Application Playback........................................ 3 Performance Challenges for Automotive Ethernet/IP Systems..................... 4 Timing in safety-critical systems.................................. 4 Synchronicity............................................ 4 Prioritization............................................. 4 Key Performance Tests for Automotive Ethernet/IP Systems...................... 5 1. RFC 2889 & RFC 2544 tests................................... 5 2. Jitter............................................... 5 3. Bandwidth/Load......................................... 5 4. QoS............................................... 6 5. Timing............................................... 6 6. Testing performance under real world conditions...................... 6 Spirent Solutions for Automotive Ethernet................................ 7 SPIRENT WHITE PAPER www.spirent.com i

Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet SPIRENT Introduction Ethernet has long been the standard for data communication across local area networks (LANs), with the result that today s IT and telecommunications professionals are well versed in the unique challenges of testing Ethernet/IP performance. But Ethernet is a relatively new proposition for automotive OEMs. Offering significant cost and performance benefits over legacy in-vehicle networking technologies, it is set to play a growing role in future in-vehicle networks and it now has a viable physical layer standard for the automotive industry, in the form of Open Alliance BroadR-Reach (OABR). As vehicle manufacturers begin explore the opportunities offered by OABR, they will face new performance testing challenges that present a step-change away from existing performance testing regimes for legacy technologies such as CAN Bus, LIN, MOST and FlexRay. This white paper one of a series on different aspects of BroadR-Reach testing is intended to give automotive developers a rapid introduction to Ethernet/IP performance testing, with specific focus on aspects which are unusual or particular to in-vehicle networks and OABR. As a member of the OPEN Alliance Special Interest Group, Spirent is playing a key role in establishing best practice test standards for new in-vehicle networks based on BroadR-Reach. Drawing on our 25+-year heritage in network testing, our engineers have been working closely with automotive manufacturers to develop tailored, industry-specific answers, ensuring tomorrow s vehicles can take full advantage of the benefits of 2-wire Ethernet. Likewise, Spirent is an active member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), defining protocol test standards in the data link, network and transport layers, including TCP/IP. We trust you will find this document useful. However, if you have particular questions, or would like more detailed technical information on testing methodologies, we would be delighted to help. SPIRENT WHITE PAPER www.spirent.com 1

SPIRENT Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet Ethernet/IP Performance Testing in IT and Telecommunications In the wider world, Ethernet is a well-established technology. A great variety of standards and methodologies already exist around Ethernet/IP performance testing, and in many instances, teams engaged in the R&D of automotive systems stand to save a great deal of time, money and effort by applying and adapting these existing best practices. In this section, we will review some of the key Ethernet/IP performance tests regularly conducted in the context of IT and telecommunications. Throughput, Delay, Jitter, Packet-Loss, Packet Out of Order Common metrics for testing Ethernet/IP performance include: Throughput The maximum volume of data that can be successfully delivered between two points, usually measured in bits or packets per second Latency The time taken for data packets to travel between two points Jitter he variation in latency (e.g. due to network congestion) Packet loss The failure of data packets to reach their destination Packet out of order The delivery of data packets in a different order from that in which they were sent While these performance metrics are often tested separately, there is another option. Since its creation in 1999, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC-2544 1 benchmarking methodology has supplied network engineers with a shared set of performance tests. These tests can be automated for increased testing speed. Commonly used in the design, deployment and maintenance of Ethernet telecommunications networks, RFC-2544 includes Throughput, Latency and Frame Loss Tests, and is set to prove a valuable tool for automotive engineers working on Ethernet/IP applications. Switch Benchmarking Sitting on Layer 2 of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model, Ethernet switches play a central role in network operation, effectively managing the flow of data. In August 2000 IETF RFC-2889 2 was created, extending RFC-2544 s benchmarking methodology to Local Area Network (LAN) switching devices. The current standard for initial performance testing of OSI Layer 2 switches, it covers common performance and Quality of Service (QoS) tests, as well as tests that deal with switchspecific functionality. 1 http://www.ieft.org/rfc/rfc2544.txt 2 http://www,ieft,org/rfc/rfc2889.txt 2 www.spirent.com SPIRENT WHITE PAPER

Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet SPIRENT Quality of Service Ensuring (QoS) is key concern for organisations whose businesses depend on the timely and accurate transmission of data across local and wide area networks. In automotive applications, where lives could depend on the timely delivery of critical data, the ability to effectively classify and prioritise will be absolutely vital. Key QoS architectures and standards include: DiffServ A networking architecture that uses the Differentiated Services CodePoint IP header field (a replacement for the original Type of Service field) to classify and prioritise packets. IEEE 802.1Q A networking standard that supports the use of virtual LANs, or VLANS. Through the addition of a 12-bit 802.1Q VLAN ID and 3-bit 802.1p p-tag, VLANs enable the partitioning of a single LAN into multiple, virtual LANs, as well as the prioritisation of particular Ethernet frames. Synchronisation During the rapid adoption of Ethernet by telecom and wireless providers, ensuring synchronisation between nodesand reliability of service has been a common challenge. To meet this need, a number of protocols have already been developed. These include: IEEE1588v2 (or Precision Time Protocol) both a protocol and a testing standard 802.1AS A sub-protocol and a standard, for especially time-sensitive applications Like QoS tests, synchronisation performance test will have an important role to play in the development of automotive Ethernet. Application Playback By recording the traffic from videos, Electronic Control Units (ECUs) and proprietary systems and playing it back to a device under test, network engineers can gain a more complete picture of network performance. The traffic played back takes two key forms: Unicast Traffic is sent to one destination, identified by a unique address Multicast Traffic is sent to multiple, select destinations Unicast is the most common form of communication within LANs and the Internet, while multicast is used for more complex applications for example, by a video server sending out numerous channels, to numerous recipients. SPIRENT WHITE PAPER www.spirent.com 3

SPIRENT Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet Performance Challenges for Automotive Ethernet/IP Systems While the IT and telecom industries will offer automotive OEMs proven performance testing tools and methodologies, testing Ethernet/IP for automotive applications is set to present some unique challenges. Timing in Safety-Critical Systems At present, Ethernet is most frequently used in-vehicle to support updates and diagnostics, and connect Rear Seat Entertainment (RSE) systems with their storage 3. In future, however, it has the potential to be relied on in a range of safety-critical applications, from Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), such as video cameras and radar, through to x-by-wire systems controlling braking and steering. As these systems are developed, rigorous performance testing will naturally be essential if OEMs are not only to protect drivers and passengers, but their own reputations. Synchronicity When a vehicle is activated, every device it contains needs to be ready to start functioning, together. As Ethernet is used for more in-vehicle applications, achieving effective, reliable synchronisation is set to prove a common challenge for OEMs. Prioritization At the same time as Ethernet finds its way into ADAS and x-by-wire systems, its cost and performance benefits are also likely to see it become the standard choice for infotainment and communication. This means that switches must be able to effectively recognise different types of data traffic, and prioritise that belonging to the vehicle s safety-critical systems. The use of VLANs offers a potential solution to this challenge, but rigorous performance testing will be paramount if OEMs are to safeguard QoS. 3 BMW Challenges in a future IP/Ethernet-based in-car network for real-time applications 4 www.spirent.com SPIRENT WHITE PAPER

Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet SPIRENT Key Performance Tests for Automotive Ethernet/IP Systems Testing and optimising the performance of in-vehicle Ethernet/IP technology means testing everywhere Ethernet switches are embedded: Electrical Control Units Body Domain Gateways Domain Controllers Sub-Domains Based on Spirent s 20 years of Ethernet/IP testing experience, we believe the following tests will be especially useful to those working on next-generation, Ethernet-enhanced vehicles: 1. RFC 2889 & RFC 2544 Tests These two performance benchmarking methodologies define a number of performance tests for network interconnect devices and LAN switches, including crucial latency and throughput tests. 2. Jitter The first industry standard definitions for Jitter and its measurement were set out by the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) in 2004. Systems capable of testing networks to such standards are currently available, and stand to offer great advantages when applied in automotive applications. 3. Bandwidth/Load The importance of bandwidth/load tests will already be well understood by automotive network engineers. Ethernet networks, however, bring a new testing challenge testing overload. Impossible on a traditional CAN Bus network, overload has the power to seriously compromise the performance of safety-critical devices. Testing Ethernet overload requires a physical test system, capable of both generating the traffic and reducing the interframe gap (the time between the transmission of Ethernet packets). Such systems will give automotive engineers the ability to define and produce the high loads (e.g., 103%) needed to effectively test overload scenarios. SPIRENT WHITE PAPER www.spirent.com 5

SPIRENT Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet 4. QoS As discussed, the successful prioritisation and effective queuing of Ethernet packets will be crucial to the technology s adoption within automotive applications. For OEMs, the IEEE 802.1Q standard defines a common, proven system for delivering QoS based on VLAN tagging, as well as providing a mechanism for Class of Service testing. An important amendment to 802.1Q, the 802.1Qav standard describes additional rules for shaping traffic, through the forwarding and queuing of time-sensitive streams. 5. Timing OEMs can also take advantage of existing standards as they work to meet the challenging synchronisation demands of automotive Ethernet applications. IEEE 1588v2 and, particularly, 802.1AS are ideally suited to this task. 6. Testing Performance Under Real World Conditions Testing Ethernet performance with real traffic is has two key applications in automotive network R&D. While Ethernet is likely to become increasingly commonplace in in-vehicle networks, some established technologies will exist alongside it for many years. Ethernet is unlikely to replace CAN Bus for connecting indicators, for example, since the latter technology is both cheaper and more naturally suited to the job. This means OEMs will need to be able to test an Ethernet network s ability to handle automotive-specific traffic such as CAN Bus messaging. The natural solution to this challenge is record and replay recording the traffic from automotive specific systems and replaying it over Ethernet. At the same time, record and replay of unicast and multicast traffic is also likely to prove an increasingly important technique in determining the performance of Ethernet-connected Infotainment systems. 6 www.spirent.com SPIRENT WHITE PAPER

Performance Testing BroadR-Reach Automotive Ethernet SPIRENT Spirent Solutions for Automotive Ethernet The Spirent C1/C50 hardware platform provides automotive test engineers with a fully integrated BroadR- Reach test solution. The C1/C50 includes Spirent s TestCenter Packet Generator and Analyzer software for advanced performance and functional testing of Layer 2/3 In-Vehicle Networks and components. Additional Spirent test packages are available separately, including: Protocol conformance Device/Network security and robustness Pre-defined, automated Test Suites (such as IEEE1588v2 or AVB) For detailed information please visit our Website: www.spirent.com/go/automotive SPIRENT WHITE PAPER www.spirent.com 7

SPIRENT 1325 Borregas Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA AMERICAS 1-800-SPIRENT +1-818-676-2683 sales@spirent.com EUROPE AND THE MIDDLE EAST +44 (0) 1293 767979 emeainfo@spirent.com ASIA AND THE PACIFIC +86-10-8518-2539 salesasia@spirent.com 2014 Spirent. All Rights Reserved. All of the company names and/or brand names and/or product names referred to in this document, in particular, the name Spirent and its logo device, are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Spirent plc and its subsidiaries, pending registration in accordance with relevant national laws. All other registered trademarks or trademarks are the property of their respective owners. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Spirent. The information in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, Spirent assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in the document. Rev A. 06/14