Packets vs. Circuits Why N+0 Ethernet Protection is Better Than the N+1 SDH/SONET Protection Scheme

Similar documents
FibeAir I500R High Capacity Wireless Network Solution

1+1: Protected Microwave Links

How To Create A Converged Network For Public Safety

WIRELESS IN THE METRO PACKET MICROWAVE EXPLAINED

MIGRATING PUBLIC SAFETY NETWORKS TO IP/MPLS

MIGRATING TDM SERVICES TO PACKET NETWORKS ENSURING RELIABLE AND EFFICIENT TRANSPORT WITH THE ALCATEL-LUCENT 9500 MICROWAVE PACKET RADIO

Benefits of RPR for Utility Critical Infrastructure Networks

Application Note License-Exempt Gigabit Ethernet Microwave Radio Applications

BUILDING BETTER BACKHAUL EVERYWHERE

Converged TDM and IP- Based Broadband Solutions White Paper. OnSite OS-10 Multi-Service over SDH Provisioning

Building a Bigger Pipe: Inverse Multiplexing for Transparent Ethernet Bridging over Bonded T1/E1s

Wireless Carrier Ethernet Networks

Smart Solutions for Network IP Migration

Alcatel-Lucent 1850 TSS Product Family. Seamlessly migrate from SDH/SONET to packet

Converged Optical Ethernet White Paper. OnSite OS-10 Multi-Services over SDH Provisioning

Dedicated Access Solutions for Internet Service Providers

Transporting Legacy Switched Digital Circuits Using a Packet Network

Total Communication Solutions. Leading provider of customer-focused technology and communications solutions for the global marketplace

Offshore Communications

Three Network Technologies

Enabling Rural Broadband Services with Wireless Backhaul

How to Reduce Cellular Backhaul Transport Costs While Improving 2G and 3G Network Operating Efficiencies

Comparing WiMAX and HSPA+ White Paper

The cost and performance benefits of 80 GHz links compared to short-haul GHz licensed frequency band products

Course 12 Synchronous transmission multiplexing systems used in digital telephone networks

White paper. Reliable and Scalable TETRA networks

IP/MPLS. Marios Parperis - Alcatel-Lucent Energy Systems Integration Division. October Alcatel-Lucent 2010 All Rights Reserved

Deploying Multiservice Applications Using RPR Over the Existing SONET Infrastructure

How To Run A Telephony System Over An Ip Or Ipmux (Tcmux) On A Network (Ipmux) With A Pbip) Or Ipip (Ipip) On An Ip/Ethernet/Mp

1 Introduction Services and Applications for HSPA Organization of the Book 6 References 7

WHITEPAPER MPLS: Key Factors to Consider When Selecting Your MPLS Provider

Understanding Mobile Wireless Backhaul

Leased-Line Replacement. Utilizing gigabit wireless links to provide fiber-like performance at significant savings compared to leased lines.

Wireless Backhaul Solutions

White Paper. Wireless Network Considerations for Mobile Collaboration

Packet-Optical Ethernet Business Access Networks

LTE BACKHAUL REQUIREMENTS A REALITY CHECK PETER CROY, SENIOR NETWORK ARCHITECT, AVIAT NETWORKS

MPLS: Key Factors to Consider When Selecting Your MPLS Provider Whitepaper

The Keys for Campus Networking: Integration, Integration, and Integration

Microwave Technologies for Carrier Ethernet Services

Fiber to the Home. Definition. Overview. Topics

Business Case for the Brocade Carrier Ethernet IP Solution in a Metro Network

The Economics of Gigabit 4G Mobile Backhaul

NEW WORLD TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED. 2 nd Trial Test Report on 3.5GHz Broadband Wireless Access Technology

Traffic. Data Dominant. Time. Figure 1. Wireless network traffic timescale

Best Effort gets Better with MPLS. Superior network flexibility and resiliency at a lower cost with support for voice, video and future applications

of Network Access ASC Broadband Services Access Platform The New Edge Advanced Switching Communications

Packet Synchronization in Cellular Backhaul Networks By Patrick Diamond, PhD, Semtech Corporation

Traffic Engineering & Network Planning Tool for MPLS Networks

How To Be Profitable With An Alcatel-Lucent 1655Amu System

TCP/IP Network Communication in Physical Access Control

Cooperative Techniques in LTE- Advanced Networks. Md Shamsul Alam

Get the best performance from your LTE Network with MOBIPASS

The future of mobile networking. David Kessens

Wireless Technologies for the 450 MHz band

Allstream Converged IP Telephony

Bandwidth Optimization Solutions: Building Cost-Effective Backup Protection Networks. Application Note

AltaLink IP/MPLS Network. Nov 3, 2011 Stephen VanderZande

ALTERNATIVE BACKHAUL AND DATA OFFLOAD SOLUTIONS FOR GSM AND UMTS OPERATORS

Failsafe Protection for Utility Critical Infrastructure

Connect & Go with WDM PON Ea 1100 WDM PON

Use of MPLS in Mobile Backhaul Networks

How To Make A Multilink Ame Relay Work Faster And More Efficiently

LTE BACKHAUL REQUIREMENTS: A REALITY CHECK

ICTTEN6043A Undertake network traffic management

App coverage. ericsson White paper Uen Rev B August 2015

CHAPTER 1 1 INTRODUCTION

Pseudo-Wires: The Full-Service Alternative to TDM Access WHITE PAPER

SkyWay-Mobile. Broadband Wireless Solution

Circuit Emulation Pseudo-Wire (CE-PW) WHITE PAPER

Auspex Support for Cisco Fast EtherChannel TM

Mobile. Analyzing, Planning and Optimizing Heterogeneous Mobile Access and Core Networks

NETWORK ISSUES: COSTS & OPTIONS

Truffle Broadband Bonding Network Appliance

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES

LoopStar 700. Next Generation Ethernet Access and Transport Solutions

Performance Management for Next- Generation Networks

The WestNet Advantage: -- Textbooks, ebooks, ecourses -- Instructor Resourse Center -- Student Resource Center

WHITE PAPER. Realistic LTE Performance From Peak Rate to Subscriber Experience

Top Six Considerations

CONNECT PROTECT SECURE. Communication, Networking and Security Solutions for Defense

The Conversion Technology Experts. Quality of Service (QoS) in High-Priority Applications

Voice over IP Networks: Ensuring quality through proactive link management

LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation Optimization

The need for bandwidth management and QoS control when using public or shared networks for disaster relief work

Deploying the ShoreTel IP Telephony Solution with a Meru Networks Wireless LAN

White Paper. OPCOM3500 Multi-Service Access Platform INTRODUCTION CHARACTERISTICS

Global Headquarters: 5 Speen Street Framingham, MA USA P F

SafeNet Network Encryption Solutions Safenet High-Speed Network Encryptors Combine the Highest Performance With the Easiest Integration and

Mobile Wireless Overview

White paper. Mobile broadband with HSPA and LTE capacity and cost aspects

Transport for Enterprise VoIP Services

Mobile Backhaul over Copper Networks

Transcription:

Packets vs. Circuits Why N+0 Ethernet Protection is Better Than the N+1 SDH/SONET Protection Scheme Abstract Summary N+0 Ethernet protection vs. N+1 SDH/SONET Many operators are considering, or are in the process of migrating, their backbone networks to all-packet transmission. Naturally, they are concerned about the protection mechanism available in packet-based systems and how it compares with the commonly used N+1 scheme in SDH/SONET networks. The protection mechanism employed in packet networks is N+0 Ethernet--new to many operators and not well understood. This Technical Brief describes the N+0 Ethernet protection scheme and traffic distribution technologies employed by C N+gE / Evolution IP Long Haul series to build redundant and resilient high-capacity, long-distance links. It compares traditional N+1 SDH/SONET protection, first, with Ethernet over SDH/SONET using LCAS and, then, with the technologically advanced, all-ip network protection scheme. It also explains the improvement in all-ip network utilization at all times and transmission conditions. 1

Transmission Network Performance and Availability I l Ed+y /ld+ +- and video-centric networks, performance degradation that results in data loss and dropped connections may be as critical as complete link unavailability. But link availability means far more than preventing failures. It also involves the prevention of performance degradation to keep data transmission at an acceptable level. Traditional SDH/SONET long-distance microwave networks employ N+1 redundancy schemes where one channel is designated as a protection/reserve channel for N active channels. When one channel fails, the protection channel is brought into active service to maintain the traffic from the failed channel. However, in such a scheme, the failure of a second channel has no protection channel (it is being used already) and traffic from this channel is simply lost. With the migration to Ethernet-over-SDH/SONET, new protection schemes could be introduced. Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) 1 and Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) 2, offered by Ceragon Long Haul radio equipment for several years, provide active and reliable protection. With LCAS, several SDH/SONET transport containers in a long-haul application, mainly VC-4/OC-3, form a group. Packets are mapped onto the group and distributed over the available members (carriers). Should one or more members fail, LCAS automatically distributes the packets over the remaining members. Quality-of-service (QoS) mechanisms ensure that high-priority traffic is transmitted unaffected. Unfortunately, this protection scheme is not hitless and causes packet loss every time one container is removed from the group. Furthermore, it does not offer adaptive coding and modulation (described later) to achieve the highest level of throughput under degraded conditions nor does it utilize the available spectrum efficiently as each member is limited to a maximum throughput of ~150 Mbps. The advance of native Ethernet technologies and the shift to all-ip communications call for new ways to maximize network performance and link availability. New bandwidth-hungry services incessantly demand more capacity and require improved ways to utilize spectrum. Near-100% availability of voice traffic is a natural expectation with users demanding a consistently high level of quality for their VOIP communications and video channels. To address this ever-increasing demand, microwave equipment vendors must elaborate more efficient protection mechanisms for their all-ip networks (1) to provide the requisite high level of redundancy and resiliency and (2) to make sure that high-priority traffic is transmitted unaffected. 1 Virtual concatenation (VCAT) is an inverse multiplexing technique creating a large-capacity payload container distributed over multiple small capacity TDM signals. (Wikipedia) 2 Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) is a method to dynamically increase or decrease the bandwidth of virtual containers. (Wikipedia) 2

Multicarrier Adaptive Bandwidth Control (ABC) C N+gE /l Evolution Long Haul Series features Multicarrier Adaptive Bandwidth Control, the unique technology for traffic distribution over multiple RF carriers. It is an excellent solution for all-ip network protection. Multicarrier ABC dynamically adjusts total link capacity depending on the number of current channels and the sum of the available capacity of each to provide the highest throughput at any moment. In ABC, the traffic from the Ethernet port is distributed to all available RF channels in a roundrobin fashion independent of packet size and flow. This results in a single, high-capacity, efficient Ethernet link with a high level of resilience. If an RF channel fails, the overall throughput may drop, but the remaining capacity is always fully utilized. C N+gE /l QoS scheduler ensures that high-priority traffic is transmitted unaffected. Low-priority traffic may be dropped if the link becomes congested. Multichannel Adaptive Bandwidth Control Is an effective technology for transporting packets over multiple dynamic links Works at the Layer 1 level and is independent of frame types and packet flows (as opposed to Ethernet Link Aggregation, another technique that is sometimes employed) Automatically scales with available channels/links Supports an aggregated payload (Layer 2) of up to 8 channels ~ 2 Gb/s Changes to modulation are hitless they introduce no bit errors or packet loss High-priority traffic is granted primacy and is transmitted without deterioration 3

Multicarrier ABC at Full Capacity Adaptive Coding and Modulation (ACM) C N+gE /levolution Long Haul Series also features Adaptive Coding and Modulation (ACM). In ACM mode, the radio selects the highest possible link capacity based on received signal quality. If the signal quality is degraded due to link fading or interference, the radio automatically adapts by changing to a more robust modulation which will protect the signal even though this will cause a consequential deterioration of link capacity. Communications can be maintained at this level for as long as necessary. When signal quality improves, ACM automatically senses the improved condition and reverts to the faster level of modulation. Link capacity is automatically restored to its original level. The capacity changes are hitless (no bit-errors are introduced). During the period of reduced capacity, traffic is prioritized based on Ethernet QoS and TDM priority settings. In cases of over-congestion, the Ethernet or TDM traffic with lowest priority is dropped. TDM capacity per modulation state is configurable as part of the TDM priority setting. ACM regulation works independently in the two traffic directions. Adaptive Coding and Modulation usually comes into play very infrequently perhaps only for a few hours per year. 4

Adaptive Coding and Modulation: Adaptive Coding and Modulation (ACM) Automatically scales down the microwave link / modulation under degraded conditions Acts early and pre-emptively before errors are introduced Protects long data flows from time-out, but with reduced speed N+0 Ethernet Protection With Evolution IP Long Haul employing N+0 Ethernet protection, all channels are active and the entire transmission capacity is used for payload traffic. Unlike SDH/SONET N+1 protection schemes, no channel has to be dedicated to protection; all can participate in the maximization of total throughput. Multichannel Automatic Bandwidth Control technology provides a reliable protection mechanism to ensure that the traffic is transmitted unaffected even when the link has degraded. If a channel has degraded to a state of failure, it is automatically excluded from the distribution and overall capacity is reduced concomitantly. Unlike the N+1 SDH/SONET scheme, N+0 Ethernet protection provides reliable transmission even when more than one channel is lost. At the same time, with Adaptive Coding and Modulation, Evolution IP Long Haul radios automatically adjust modulation with current link conditions protecting vital transmissions and data flows even in degraded conditions. 5

Multicarrier ABC with ACM and QoS with One Degraded Channel 6

N+0 Ethernet Protection vs. N+1 SDH/SONET Protection N+1 SDH/SONET N+0 LCAS SDH/SONET N+0 Ethernet Protection with Multichannel ABC Benefits of N+0 Ethernet Protection Number of protection carriers 1 dedicated carrier for protection All carriers protect each other All carriers protect each other With ABC, all carriers are used for transmission giving higher throughput and embedded protection for all channels Scalability Fixed capacity per carrier, only one channel for protection Pipe scalable in steps of 155 Mbps only Highly scalable across the whole pipe Scalable ABC pipe with ACM results in higher overall throughput and less outage ACM No No Yes Max capacity per carrier Hitless switching Link availability STM-1 or 63xE1/ OC-3 or 84xT1 ~150 Mbps 28 MHz >200 Mbps 40 MHz - >275 Mbps 56 MHz - >350 Mbps Yes No Yes Protection provided to only one channel at a time. No QoS. No ACM High availability, LCAS and QoS. No ACM Highest availability due to ACM, ABC and QoS Modulation scales under reduced conditions Improved capacity Graceful degradation of link outage Highest availability Benefits of Native Ethernet Protection Beyond SDH/SONET Protection Increased flexibility Improved availability as link may not be 100% utilized when fading occurs Allows higher aggregate capacity as protected bandwidth is also used during normal operation Scales automatically with failures or fading Re-scales automatically to original settings when service returns 7

Summary Ever since Ceragon pioneered the SDH Long Haul market in 1992, it has continuously worked to provide its customers with the latest technologies to build high-reliability, future-proof, long-distance links. As networks evolve to Ethernet-over-SDH/SONET and to all-ip, link protection mechanisms need to not only offer transmission reliability and network redundancy, but must also insure maximum capacity at every level of link quality. C N+gE /l pnepnt +Nyl m 1Edl fenl N+ffTPl dt/ NTbN TE l + dl pne P TE,l MN TP1+ l ABC utilizing Adaptive Coding and Modulation, is a superior technology for protecting link traffic while it gracefully scales down the link in case of fading, at all times providing the highest possible overall throughput. Compared to the traditional N+1 SDH/SONET approach or Ethernet over SDH/SONET with LCAS, Multichannel ABC provides higher resiliency and better link redundancy which results in higher availability of service and a more capacious link. ABOUT CERAGON Ceragon Networks Ltd. (NASDAQ: CRNT) is the premier wireless backhaul specialist. Ceragon provides high capacity LTE/4G wireless backhaul solutions that enable cellular operators and other wireless service providers to deliver voice and data services, enabling smart-phone applications such as Internet browsing, music and video. With unmatched tec1 E Egyl + dl PE/ l T ES+ TE,l C N+gE /l +ds+ P dl pet -topoint microwave systems allow wireless service providers to evolve their networks from circuit-switched and hybrid concepts to all IP networks. Ceragon solutions are designed to support all wireless access technologies, delivering more capacity over E g Nl dt/ + P /l N d Nl + yl gts l d p Eym l /P +NTEHl C N+gE /l /E N TE /l +N l deployed by more than 200 service providers of all sizes, and hundreds of private networks in more than 130 countries. Visit Ceragon at www.ceragon.com. 8