Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet



Similar documents
Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015

Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

Community Supervision in Texas

Texas Criminal Justice Coalition Safer, Smarter, and More Cost- Efficient Approaches to Reducing Crime In Texas

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 Civic Center Drive West P.O. Box Santa Ana, CA (877)

What you don t know can hurt you.

Criminal and Juvenile Justice Uniform Cost Report

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )

Office of the Bexar County Criminal District Attorney

How to Apply for a Pardon. State of California. Office of the Governor

AB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.

The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

At A Glance. Contact. Two Year State Budget: $122 million - General Fund

Oranges To Oranges: Comparing The Operational Costs Of Juvenile And Adult Correctional Programs In Texas

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report

Pablo Martinez Ph.D RESUME. Summary

FACT SHEET. Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Youth Under Age 18 in the Adult Criminal Justice System. Christopher Hartney

[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11

2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill:

LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT

Austin Travis County Integral Care Jail Diversion Programs and Strategies

Evaluation of the Performance of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Tier Programs

ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Impact of Arizona s Probation Reforms in 2010

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

Criminal Justice Study Consensus Questions

(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *

Communicating the Struggle Between Due Process and Public Safety. National Association of Counties, July 2012

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst:

Determining your parole eligibility

MINNESOTA S EXPERIENCE IN REVISING ITS JUVENILE CODE AND PROSECUTOR INPUT IN THE PROCESS September 1997

AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:

Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013

ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL

Texas Civil Commitment-Outpatient Sexually Violent Predator Treatment Program (OSVPTP) Health & Safety Code, Chapter 841

Data Management Plan. County of Sonoma CCP Data Management and Evaluation Sub-committee

Three Year Recidivism Tracking of Offenders Participating in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

Adult Probation: Terms, Conditions and Revocation

PROBATION LENGTH AND CONDITIONS IN KANSAS

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment

How To Start A Community Corrections Program

CERTIFICATES OF RELIEF FROM DISABILITIES AND CERTIFICATES OF GOOD CONDUCT

How To Fund A Mental Health Court

Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit

TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY VITA

Criminal Justice 101 and the Affordable Care Act. Prepared by: Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION REPORT September 8, 2005

DUI HANDBOOK. Driving Under the Influence in Pennsylvania. The Martin Law Firm, P.C.

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections

Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines

External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015

Criminal Justice in Nevada Part I: Overview

Youth in the Juvenile Justice System: Trends and Solutions

Maryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters

County of San Diego Public Safety Realignment & Post-Release Community Supervision. Preliminary 2011 Implementation Plan

CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE. André de Gruy Capital Defender

PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007

LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 1026

DIVERT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY

Introduction. 1 P age

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE

Mental Health & Addiction Forensics Treatment

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

Criminal Justice Quarterly Report January 2009-March 2009

Affordable Care Act: Health Coverage for Justice Involved Individuals

Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System. Ashley Rogers, M.A. LPC

Offender Screening. Oklahoma Department of Mental health and Substance Abuse Services

FLORIDA CRIMINAL OFFENSES AMANDA POWERS SELLERS AND JENNA C. FINKELSTEIN

Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System

Contra Costa County: A Model for Managing Local Corrections

ILLINOIS STATE PROFILE

Chapter 504. (Senate Bill 422) Criminal Procedure Office of the Public Defender Representation Criminal Defendants Citations and Appearances

County of San Diego SB 618 Reentry Program. May 3, 2007

Reform of the Rockefeller Drug Laws and the Impact on Criminal Justice

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2055

Part I Improvements to Existing Programs

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Governor Jennifer M. Granholm,

A Better Model: Ensuring Equal Justice for Persons With Mental Illness & Mental Retardation

Preprinted Logo will go here

OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT:

THE SOUTH DAKOTA 24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT AN OVERVIEW NEW MEXICO PRESENTATION

Indigent Defense Expenditure Report Manual Fiscal Year 2015

Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security

Title 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

Transcription:

Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet For more information, contact Dr. Ana Yáñez- Correa at acorrea@texascjc.org, or (512) 587-7010. The Texas Criminal Justice Coalition seeks the implementation of realistic criminal justice strategies that safely reduce the State s costly over- reliance on incarceration creating stronger families, less taxpayer waste, and safer communities. Below, we have provided comprehensive information about Orange County s adult population at various stages of criminal justice system involvement. We have also provided the associated costs at each stage to highlight the significant expense to incarcerate or supervise these populations. Total County Population Orange County Population: 1 82,487 STAGE 1: Pretrial Jail Detention Of all the people incarcerated in Texas county jails, more than half (on average) have not been convicted of the crime for which they are accused. They are in pretrial detention, awaiting trial. 2 Many men and women cannot afford the bond that would allow them to return to the community prior to trial; others are not given that option by judges, despite presenting little flight risk or posing no danger to public safety. This leads to unnecessary and costly jail overcrowding. Orange County Jail Population: 3 167 Orange County Jail Pretrial Population: 4 97 (58%)» Number of Pretrial Defendants with Misdemeanor Charges: 38» Number of Pretrial Defendants with State Jail Charges: 5» Number of Pretrial Defendants with Felony Charges: 54 Statewide Average Cost to County Taxpayers to Incarcerate One Individual in County Jail, Per Day (Pretrial or Post- Conviction): 5 $59.00 Average Cost to Orange County Taxpayers to Incarcerate the Entire Orange County Jail Pretrial Population, Per Day: $5,723» Average Cost to Incarcerate Pretrial Defendants with Misdemeanor Charges: $2,242» Average Cost to Incarcerate Pretrial Defendants with State Jail Charges: $295» Average Cost to Incarcerate Pretrial Defendants with Felony Charges: $3,186 Page 1

STAGE 2: Court- Appointed Counsel Any indigent individual in Texas charged with a Class B misdemeanor or higher is entitled to court- appointed representation. However, counties pay for 83% of indigent defense costs, statewide. The state pays only 17%. 6 As such, counties with already strained budgets may struggle to provide legal representation for all defendants who request an attorney. Number of Individuals (Adult and Juveniles) in Orange County Receiving Constitutionally Guaranteed Representation (Court- Appointed Counsel): 7 1,324» Number of Adults with Misdemeanor Charges: 534» Number of Adults with Felony Charges: 658» Number of Juveniles with Cases: 116» Number of Individuals with Appeals Cases: 16» Number of Individuals with Capital Cases: 0 Total Indigent Defense Expenditures Paid by Orange County in FY 2012: 8 $364,318.16 State Formula- Based Grant 9 Amount Received by Orange County to Provide Indigent Defense Services: 10 $29,936.25 (8%) STAGE 3 Option A Diversion from Incarceration to Community- Based Supervision (Probation) Judges have the option of sentencing certain individuals to probation instead of prison or jail. Not only is probation over 30 times cheaper than prison or jail, 11 it is more effective than incarceration at lowering rates of re- offending, especially when paired with rehabilitative programming. 12 As such, investments in probation help boost public safety in the long term and reduce the likelihood of victims. Number of Individuals in Orange County on Community Supervision (Probation): 13 1,042» Number of Individuals on Misdemeanor Probation: 317» Number of Individuals on Felony Probation: 725 Statewide Average Cost to the State to Have One Individual on Probation, Per Day: 14 $1.38 Average Cost to the State for the Entire Orange County Probation Population, Per Day: $1,437.96 Page 2

STAGE 3 Option B Incarceration in County Jail, State Jail, Prison, or a Designated Treatment Facility Texas has various types of correctional facilities to house individuals with misdemeanor or felony convictions. Our 246 county jails house individuals with both misdemeanor and felony offenses (including state jail felonies and felonies of various degrees); they also temporarily house parole violators and individuals awaiting transfer to another type of correctional facility. 15 Texas 20 state jails 16 house individuals with offenses of various levels. 17 Our 57 prisons 18 house individuals with felony or capital offenses. Our 5 Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Facilities (SAFPFs) 19 house individuals with felony offenses who have been placed in this structured treatment regimen. 20 Correctional Facilities in Orange County Orange County Jail Misdemeanor Offenses Number of Individuals Sentenced to Orange County Jail: 21 23 Statewide Average Cost to County Taxpayers Incarcerate One Individual in County Jail, Per Day: 22 $59.00 Average Cost to Orange County Taxpayers to Incarcerate the Entire Population of Individuals Sentenced to Orange County Jail, Per Day: $1,357 Felony Offenses Number of Individuals from Orange County Sentenced to State- Level Confinement: 785» Number of Such Individuals Sentenced to State Jail: 23 130 (17%) Average Cost to the State to Incarcerate One Individual in State Jail, Per Day: 24 $42.90 Average Cost to the State to Incarcerate the Entire Population of Individuals from Orange County Sentenced to State Jail, Per Day: $5,577» Number of Such Individuals Sentenced to Prison: 25 640 (82%) Average Cost to the State to Incarcerate One Individual in Prison, Per Day: 26 $50.04 Average Cost to the State to Incarcerate the Entire Population of Individuals from Orange County Sentenced to Prison, Per Day: $32,025.60» Number of Such Individuals Placed in a SAFPF: 27 15 (2%) Average Cost to the State to Place One Individual in a SAFPF, Per Day: 28 $63.19 Average Cost to the State to House and Treat the Entire Population of Individuals from Orange County Placed in a SAFPF, Per Day: $947.85 Page 3

STAGE 4: Community- Based Supervision After Release From Prison (Parole or Community Supervision) The vast majority of people who are incarcerated in state- level corrections facilities are ultimately released back into the community. Upon leaving state jail, most individuals are left unsupervised. Upon leaving prison, however, individuals are either supervised on parole, supervised on community supervision (e.g., shock probation), or released on flat discharge (unsupervised). Total Number of Individuals Released from State- Level Confinement to Orange County: 29 342» Number of Individuals Released to Community Supervision: 30 33 (10%) Statewide Average Cost to the State to Have One Individual on Probation, Per Day: 31 $1.38 Average Cost to the State for the Entire Orange County Post- Release Probation Population, Per Day: $45.54» Number of Individuals Released to Parole Supervision: 32 187 (55%) Statewide Average Cost to the State to Have One Individual on Parole, Per Day: 33 $3.63 Average Cost to the State for the Entire Orange County Parole Population, Per Day: $678.81» Number of Individuals Released on Flat Discharge: 34 122 (36%) Return to Prison Number of Individuals in Orange County who Returned to Prison: 35 32 Page 4

References 1 United States Census Bureau, State & County Quick Facts: Texas Orange County; available at http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48/48361.html. Figure reflects Population, 2011 estimate. 2 Texas Commission on Jail Standards, Texas County Jail Population, December 1, 2012. 12- month average pretrial population totaled just over 57%. 3 Texas Commission on Jail Standards (TCJS), Abbreviated Population Report for 12/1/2012. 4 Ibid. Total includes Pretrial Felons, Pretrial Misd[emeanors] and Pretrial S[tate] J[ail] F[elonies]. 5 Brandon Wood, then- Assistant Director of the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, in presentation at American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section, Roundtable on Pretrial Detention in Texas, held in Austin, Texas, March 30, 2012. Figure reflects cost per jail bed per day. 6 Texas Indigent Defense Commission, FY 2011 Annual and Expenditure Report, January 2012, p. 21; available via http://www.txcourts.gov/tidc/annual_reports_archives.asp. P. 21: Total indigent defense expenditures in FY11 were of $198,364,999. Of that amount counties funded $164,724,287 and State through the Commission funded $33,640,712 through its grants program. 7 Data obtained from Texas Indigent Defense Commission web portal at http://tfid.tamu.edu/public.net/ ( Quick Stats 2012 ), as reported by each county s auditor or person designated by the Commissioner s Court. 8 Ibid. 9 This is the amount of the formula grants provided to Orange County in fiscal year 2012. In 2002, the Texas Legislature began providing state funds for indigent defense and directed the Texas Indigent Defense Commission to distribute these funds in the form of grants to counties to help counties improve their indigent defense systems and promote compliance with the requirements of state law relating to indigent defense. 10 Data obtained from Texas Indigent Defense Commission web portal at http://tfid.tamu.edu/public.net/. 11 Legislative Budget Board (LBB), Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, Fiscal Years 2010 to 2012, Submitted to the 83 rd Texas Legislature, January 2013, p. 8 [Fiscal Year 2012 prison costs: $50.04 per bed per day; FY 2012 state jail costs: $42.90 per bed per day] and p. 14 [FY 2012 probation costs to state: $1.38 per participant per day]; available at www.lbb.state.tx.us/public_safety_criminal_justice/uniform_cost/criminal%20justice%20uniform%20cost%20re port%20fiscal%20years%202010%20to%202012.pdf. 12 While on probation, individuals can serve their sentence while taking part in rehabilitative programs, maintaining family relationships, and remaining a participant in the community critical to reducing the flow to prison without jeopardizing public safety. Indeed, Texas has seen an increase in probation felony placements on community supervision, and yet a simultaneous decrease in revocations. Specifically, while the average Felony Direct Supervision population increased sharply from 2006 to 2010, jumping from 158,479 in 2006 to 172,893 in 2010, the average revocation rate decreased, settling at 14.7% in FY 2010. From 2010 through 2012, revocations further fell to 14.5%, while the Felony Direct Supervision population fell slightly to 168,487. See: Legislative Budget Board, Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates: Submitted to the 83 rd Texas Legislature, January 2013, p. 20; available at www.lbb.state.tx.us/public_safety_criminal_justice/recrev_rates/statewide%20criminal%20justice%20recidivis m%20and%20revocation%20rates2012.pdf. Regarding rehabilitative programming: According to the National Institute of Corrections at the U.S. Department of Justice, punishment increases an individual s inclination towards criminal activity by.07%; treatment decreases an individual s inclination towards criminal activity by 15%; and cognitive skills programs decrease an individual s inclination towards criminal activity by 29%, making them most effective at decreasing criminal behavior. See: Judge Marion F. Edwards, Reduce Recidivism in DUI Offenders: Add a Cognitive- Behavioral Program Component, 2006, p. 3. 13 Community Justice Assistance Division (CJAD), FY2011 Offender Profile population numbers by County, provided to Texas Criminal Justice Coalition on March 11, 2013. Data available upon request. 14 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 14. Figure reflects FY 2012 state cost of community supervision. 15 TCJS, Abbreviated Population Report. 16 Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), Unit Directory; available at: http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/unit_directory/index.html. Page 5

17 Mike Ward, State jails struggle with lack of treatment, rehab programs, Austin American- Statesman, December 30, 2012; John Hurt, a spokesman for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice [ ] said that state jails housed 25,458 of the approximately 152,000 convicts in state- run lockups at the end of October. Of those, just 11,802 were serving time for state jail offenses. Another 13,530 were regular convicts, some enrolled in treatment programs and others awaiting a slot in special drug therapy prisons. 18 TDCJ, Unit Directory. 19 Ibid. 20 A SAFPF is an intensive six- month therapeutic and education program (or nine- month program for prisoners with special needs), typically assigned as a condition of community supervision or a modification of parole/community supervision. 21 TCJS, Abbreviated Population Report. Total includes Conv[icted] Felons Sentenced to County Jail time, Conv[icted] Misd[emeanants], and Conv[icted] S[tate] J[ail] F[elons] Sentenced to Co. Jail Time. 22 Brandon Wood, then- Assistant Director of the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, in presentation at American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section, Roundtable on Pretrial Detention in Texas, held in Austin, Texas, March 30, 2012. Figure reflects cost per jail bed per day. 23 Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 15. 24 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 8. 25 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 15. 26 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 8. 27 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 15. 28 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 8. 29 TDCJ, Statistical Report: Fiscal Year 2012, p. 40. 30 TDCJ, TDCJ Releases to Community Supervision by County of Conviction, provided to Texas Criminal Justice Coalition on January 16, 2013. Data available upon request. 31 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 14. Figure reflects FY 2012 state cost of community supervision. 32 TDCJ, Prison and SAFP Releases to Parole Supervision by County of Conviction, provided to Texas Criminal Justice Coalition on January 16, 2013. Data available upon request. 33 LBB, Criminal Justice Uniform Cost Report, p. 13. 34 TDCJ, Prison and State Jail Discharges by County of Conviction, provided to Texas Criminal Justice Coalition on January 16, 2013. Data available upon request. 35 Individuals could return to prison after being revoked while on parole, Discretionary Mandatory Supervision (DMS), or Mandatory Supervision (MS). DMS: In 1995, the Texas Legislature gave the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles (BPP) the authority to review eligible individuals whose offenses were committed on or after September 1, 1996, for possible release to Discretionary Mandatory Supervision. The BPP must review eligible prisoners on or before their discretionary mandatory eligibility date, and it has the discretion to deny release. MS: This is a type of release from prison provided by law for restricted categories of returning individuals. Eligible individuals are released on MS when their served calendar time plus their good time credit equals the length of their prison sentence. Under previous law (effective until August 31, 1996), release to MS was automatic, with no requirement for release approval from the BPP. For Orange County revocation total, see TDCJ, Prison Parole/DMS/MS Revocations by County of Conviction, provided to Texas Criminal Justice Coalition on January 16, 2013. Data available upon request. Page 6