REGIONALEDUCATIONALLABORATORY SOUTHEAST ~ SERVECenter



Similar documents
REGIONALEDUCATIONALLABORATORY SOUTHEAST ~ SERVECenter

Online Learning: Policy Trends in the United States

Costs and Funding for Virtual Schools

REGIONALEDUCATIONALLABORATORY SOUTHEAST... SERVE Center

A N S W E R S R E L N

Funding and Policy Frameworks: Virtual Learning

An Annual Review of State-Level Policy and Practice

Are Virtual Schools More Cost-Effective Compared to Traditional, Brick-and-Mortar Schools?

Understanding Senate Bill

Keeping Pace: Trends for Online Learning

Florida Virtual School and KIEL Charter School: Building Sustainable Funding Models

K12 ONLINE LEARNING: THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE AND

Keeping Pace with k 12 Online Learning

Keeping Pace with K 12 Online Learning

Keeping Pace with K 12 Online Learning

Florida Public Virtual Schools Questions and Answers

Appendix A: Virtual School Legislation, 2012 and 2013

Piloting a searchable database of dropout prevention programs in nine low-income urban school districts in the Northeast and Islands Region

Meeting Oregon s new high school math graduation requirements: examining student enrollment and teacher availability

National Perspective: Trends and Policies in Blended Learning

One argument made by policymakers who advocate

Issue Brief. State Strategies for Awarding Credit to Support Student Learning

Increasing Online Learning Options for K-12 Students:

January Key findings

The History of Georgia Virtual School

INTRODUCTION. Figure 1. Contributions by Source and Year: (Billions of dollars)

August Michigan Virtual School. Significant Features of the Michigan Virtual School (MVS) Brennan McMahon, Legislative Research Intern

Online Schools and Course Offerings Overview. NM Legislative Education Study Committee Tonette Salazar, Director of State Relations June 25, 2015

Digital Learning Task Force Gov. Nathan Deal

RESEARCH AND WRITING BY. John Watson, Amy Murin, Lauren Vashaw, Butch Gemin, Chris Rapp. Evergreen Education Group

Nuclear Engineering Enrollments and Degrees Survey, 2013 Data

Estimating college enrollment rates for Virginia public high school graduates

School Accountability in the Digital Age

Report to the North Carolina General Assembly

Part 12 Statewide Online Education Program Act

Virtual Education Reporting

Education Commission of the States 700 Broadway, Suite 1200 Denver, CO Fax:

VCF Program Statistics (Represents activity through the end of the day on June 30, 2015)

Overview of School Choice Options Provided by Colorado s Douglas County School District

Education Systems. Hundreds of companies are doing research here, but they aren t the only ones discovering things.

Overview of School Choice Policies

How To Regulate Rate Regulation

State Retirement System Defined Contribution Plans Ronald Snell September 2009

STATE PERSONAL INCOME TAXES ON PENSIONS & RETIREMENT INCOME: TAX YEAR 2010

North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Colorado Department of Education Illinois Virtual High School Wisconsin Virtual School

Board of Education Agenda Item

Funding North Carolina s Public Schools

QUALITY AUTHORIZING FOR ONLINE AND BLENDED-LEARNING CHARTER SCHOOLS

Part II: Special Education Revenues and Expenditures

TO: New York State Legislature FROM: Xue Chen SUBJECT: Should New York State create a virtual high school? DATE: 5/8/12

Colorado s Current Use of a Single Count Day and Considerations if Average Daily Membership (ADM) is Used as a Funding Mechanism

Nuclear Engineering Enrollments and Degrees Survey, 2014 Data

Understanding School Choice in Alachua County: Funding School Choice in Florida

Virtual Schools: Assessing Progress and Accountability Final Report of Study Findings

5-O-A: VIRTUAL LEARNING, DISTANCE LEARNING, & INDEPENDENT STUDY

ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 619

Health Insurance Price Index Report for Open Enrollment and Q May 2014

Maryland Policy Report

Community School Legislative History

PROPOSED FY MINIMUM FOUNDATION PROGRAM FORMULA

WDLC PROVIDING PATHWAYS FOR RURAL SCHOOLS IN WISCONSIN. Wisconsin Digital Learning Collaborative (WDLC)

State Defined Contribution and Hybrid Pension Plans

February School Choice in the States: A Policy Landscape

Education Commission of the States 700 Broadway, Suite 1200 Den ver, CO Fax:

House Appropriations Subcommittee on Education. Proposed Subcommittee Report for S402: Appropriations Act of 2013

Georgia F D F F F F F D D A C F D D F C F F C C D OH WI. This chapter compares district and. charter school revenues statewide, and

NORTH CAROLINA'S RELATIVE TAX BURDEN

Distance Education Policy

STATE INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING INFORMATION DOCUMENT

A descriptive analysis of state-supported formative assessment initiatives in New York and Vermont

Public Education Capital Outlay

Washington, DC D F F D D D F F F C F D F D F F D F F F F D F F C C D OH WI. This chapter compares district and charter

Status of State PACE Programs

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

Professional Development for the Virtual School Setting: Aligning and Designing

National Perspective on Competency-Based Education

October The Online Learning Definitions Project

Components 127th General Assembly 128th General Assembly

Community College/Technical Institute Mission Convergence Study

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

A National. Primer on K-12 Online Learning

PUBLIC EDUCATION (Pre-K-12) IN MICHIGAN

RE: VIRTUAL EDUCATION AND CYBER LEARNING: OVERVIEW OF 2012 THROUGH 2014 LESC INTERIM REPORTS

22 States do not provide access to Chapter 9 Bankruptcy

Comparing success rates for general and credit recovery courses online and face to face: Results for Florida high school courses

UNDERSTANDING AND IMPLEMENTING ONLINE LEARNING

5-O-A: VIRTUAL LEARNING, DISTANCE LEARNING, & INDEPENDENT STUDY

Attachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based

Jim Williams and Joe Adams Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama

COLORADO BOCES ASSOCIATION LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM

A National. Primer on K-12 Online Learning

5-O-D: EXPANDED ONLINE LEARNING

Appalachian Regional Development Initiative: Pikeville, KY - Technical Assistance/Funding Workshop

ONLINE LEARNING IN WASHINGTON STATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS

Georgia Special Needs Scholarship Program Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

BellSouth 20/20 Vision for Education: Costs and Funding of Virtual Schools

Education Systems. Hundreds of companies are doing research here, but they aren t the only ones discovering things.

2016 Individual Exchange Premiums updated November 4, 2015

ANTHONY P. CARNEVALE NICOLE SMITH JEFF STROHL

(c) Eligible Student student, age 21 years or younger, who attends a public or private school or is in a home study program in the state of Georgia.

Transcription:

REGIONALEDUCATIONALLABORATORY SOUTHEAST ~ SERVECenter November 2010, EBE # 741 EVIDENCE BASED EDUCATION REQUEST DESK OUR GOAL To assist educators and policymakers in their efforts to apply the evidence base to decisions about policies, programs, and practices they encounter. Greensboro REQUEST: Funding for virtual s Please provide a scan of states for information on how they fund virtual s and what the current funding levels are (most current year for which such data is available). By "how they fund, we mean what funds are provided/from what sources for the operation of the s. By "virtual s," we refer to virtual s regardless of their type including statewide virtual s (e.g., Florida Virtual School, http://www.flvs.net/areas/a..., Georgia Virtual School, http://www.gavirtual...) and statewide virtual charter s that may be run by states, districts, or companies (e.g., Georgia Cyber Academy, http://www.k12.com/gca/). Please include in the state scan the six Southeastern states plus Ohio, Wisconsin, and Colorado (and if any other states pop up in your search as having a lot of information available, include those as well). This response might be best provided in a table format. RESPONSE REL-SE staff searched the websites of the Education Commission of the States (www.ecs.org) and The International Association for K 12 Online Learning (http://www.inacol.org/). The most relevant resource found was Watson, J., Gemin, B., Ryan, J., & Wicks, M. (November 2009). Keeping Pace with K 12 Online Learning: An Annual Review of State-Level Policy and Practice. Evergreen, CO: Evergreen Education Group. (http://www.kpk12.com/downloads/keepingpace09-fullreport.pdf). The table below was created from text taken from this document. If you have any questions regarding this document, please contact the REL-SE, 1-800-755-3277 or RELSoutheast@serve.org

State AL Virtual School/Type Alabama ACCESS Distance Learning School type Funding Provided/Sources Current funding levels The ACCESS state appropriation for FY 2009 10 is $22.5 million, a $2.2 FY 2009 10: million decrease over the 2008 09 budget. The reduction is based on a $22.5 million state government proration formula applied to all government programs to meet state budget shortfalls for FY2009. ACCESS also received a onetime appropriation of $11 million in capital bond funding from the State Superintendent of Education during 2009. Capital bond funding is distributed to educational programs at the discretion of the Superintendent, who made a priority of completion of 21st Century ACCESS labs in s across the state a year ahead of schedule. FL Florida Virtual School (State also has district programs and FLVS franchises) FLVS is funded through public FTE dollars, with full funding contingent upon student success. For grades K 5 students, this is based on grade promotion. For grades 6 12 students, funding is based on successful course or credit completions. Districts receive the funding for each student and may negotiate a cost for the online program at a rate less than the per-pupil funding. Any high student in Florida can choose an FLVS course without restriction, and the funding tied to that student goes to FLVS. No other state-led program has this funding model. FY 2009 10: $464 per semester course For Florida Virtual School, per student funding was cut by approximately 10% for 2009 10, to $464 per semester course, and FLVS lost class size funding. FLVS will still receive an 11.4% add-on to FTE funding to account for students that do not complete their courses but only for public students. GA Georgia Virtual School The Georgia Virtual School is funded from a state appropriation, about $1.75 million in 2008 09, which provides a set amount to each district for online learning. When students take courses with GAVS, the district gives GAVS the equivalent of the district s FTE portion for that course segment. The state then uses those monies to pay GAVS. The amount that GAVS receives per course segment varies from one district to the next, based on the funding formula for each district. Districts receive $25 per course segment to defer administrative costs. Approximately $1.75 million in 2008 09 2

School districts can choose to disallow a local student from taking a GAVS course under this funding formula. While such a policy can suppress the district s incentive to encourage online learning as an option, current law in Georgia only allows students to take one online course per semester, or a total of two courses per year anyway. Georgia Cyber Academy Multidistrict, statewide online charter Public education funding formula. (There are also several singledistrict online programs. A commission was created in 2008 to authorize online charter s and set funding; none authorized as of September 2009.) MS Mississippi Virtual Public School Funded by state appropriation. $1.8 million for 2009 10 (State also has some district-run online programs) 3

NC North Carolina Virtual Public School (NCVPS) In 2008, NCVPS received a total appropriation of $11.2 million. The North Carolina General Assembly has also charged NCVPS to develop and implement funding plan based upon average daily membership or enrollment. This funding formula is to be presented in fall 2009 with a goal of being in place by January 2010. 2008 2009: $11.2 million SC OH South Carolina Virtual School Program Charter organization authorized three virtual charters in 2008 and another in 2009. Many online charter s (community s) Virtual charter s Virtual charter s Funded by state appropriation. Virtual charter funds are distributed by the South Carolina Public Charter School District. Virtual charter s are funded by the same formula applied to all charter s in the state. Community s, including ecommunity s, receive state funds directly from the state; these funds have been transferred from district allocations. ecomunity s are funded at the same formula per-pupil as traditional districts ($5,718 for FY 2010). The SC Virtual School Program had a budget of $3.2 million in 2008 09 $5,718 per pupil for FY 2010 ecommunity s are not eligible to receive poverty-based funding; however, they do receive the same special education-based funding as all community s. Since FY 2007, each ecommunity has been required to spend a designated amount for pupil instruction or face a possible fine of up to 5% of state payments to the. The 2009 budget bill revised the language in ORC3314.85(A) adding computers and software for students as eligible instruction expenses. 4

WI Wisconsin Virtual School (WVS)/ Wisconsin Web Academy (WWA) WVS/WWA is funded largely through course fees. 2009 annual budget: $527,000 CO Wisconsin eschool Network (State also has numerous district programs and online charter s) Colorado Online Learning Small state (State also has several online charter s and a growing number of district programs) Independent nongovernment -mental consortium (nongovernmental, nonprofit organization) Education formula funding and grants: the s are funded through public FTE funds at the same rate as brick-and-mortar s and, in some cases initially, through federal charter implementation grants. Per-pupil revenue (PPR), an FTE funding model that sets a minimum level of funding and is adjusted upward based on a number of factors for brick-and-mortar districts, remains at the state minimum for most online students. Funding is limited to 1.0 FTE per student and may be split in half but not into smaller units. In cases where students are taking more than half of an FTE class load in two s, the districts involved negotiate the payment split or, in rare cases, the split is determined by the CDE. Single-district online s are funded at the district PPR rate, receiving the same funding as the brick-and-mortar s in that district. House Bill 1066210 provides $480,000 annually through 2009 10 to fund a Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) to contract with a provider to provide online courses to districts across the state for no more than $200 per student per semester. Source: http://www.kpk12.com/downloads/keepingpace09-fullreport.pdf 5

REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LAB November 2010, EBE # 741 We provide research based information on educational initiatives happening nationally and regionally. The EBE Request Desk is currently taking requests for: - Research on a particular topic - Information on the evidence base for curriculum interventions or professional development programs - Information on large, sponsored research projects - Information on southeastern state policies and programs For more information or to make a request, contact: Karla Lewis 1.800.755.3277 klewis@serve.org The Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Southeast s Evidence Based Education (EBE) Request Desk is a service provided by a collaborative of the REL program, funded by the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences (IES). This response was prepared under a contract with IES, Contract ED-06-CO-0028, by REL-Southeast administered by the SERVE Center at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. The content of the response does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of IES or the U.S. Department of Education nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Not verified as meeting IES standards; not for distribution. 6