Investigation of Alternative Weed Management Methods in Organic Vineyards of The Aegean Region a Koray KAÇAN*, b Özhan BOZ* a



Similar documents
EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Effects on Enhanced Potassium Doses on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Tomato

INFLUENCES OF WINTER COVER CROP RESIDUES AND TILLAGE ON COTTON LINT YIELD AND QUALITY

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

THE KILL DATE AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL TO INCREASE COVER CROPS BENEFITS IN WATER QUALITY & NITROGEN RECYCLING

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Weed Management. Organic Farming Requires Weed Management. Organic farmers use a wide variety of tools and strategies to control weeds without

Can Grazing Make Organic No-Till Possible?

Maize is a major cereal grown and consumed in Uganda and in the countries of Kenya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences Special Issue: 1,

Sustainability in Agricultural Marketing:

BCR for Seed and Fibre Production with Seed and Cutting Treatments at Different Sowing Methods at JAES and KRS, BJRI in O-9897 Variety

Ecologically based weed management! Chuck Mohler! Cornell University!

School of Applied Sciences Celal Bayar University Muradiye Campus Manisa. Turkey

FARMING FOR THE FUTURE How mineral fertilizers can feed the world and maintain its resources in an Integrated Farming System

The farm: Placed in the middle of Sealand 250 hektar 5000 pigs kg produced Soiltype: JB 6

ARGENTINE NON GMO SOYBEAN CHAIN

Harvesting energy with fertilizers

You d be mad not to bet on this horse.

Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is a

Crop production million ha million tonnes PART 1. CHART 7: Harvested area of the most important crops in Central Asia (2010)

SOIL EROSION FROM MODELLING TO MITIGATION: CAN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE BE A SOLUTION?

suscon Green One application. 3 years control against grass grub. Grass grub damaged pasture

Lamport drill comparison

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Forage Options and Drought Risk: A South Dakota Case Study

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ON THE SEED GERMINATION OF RUMEX SCUTATUS L. (POLYGONACEAE)

Nitrogen uptake in cotton+greengram intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management

UTILIZATION OF CALCITE PRODUCED IN TURKEY FOR PAPER COATING

My client has purchased a disc seeder...

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

KANAT - Insurance Fund for Natural Risks in Agriculture

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

Source control targeting measures for arable tillage in the Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment, Norfolk

MICRO IRRIGATION A technology to save water

Manual for SRC Willow Growers

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, Ag Decision Maker

Perspectives of water efficient and saline agriculture. November 25th, Greet Blom-Zandstra

Identifying & Managing Weeds in Gardens. Todd Mervosh Valley Laboratory - Windsor The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station

Incorporating rice straw into soil may become disposal option for growers

BANANA PRODUCTION. ARC-Institute for Tropical and Subtropical Crops. Banana Production - English

Determination of Pomological Characteristics of Niksar District Pomegranates (Punica granatum L.) of the Tokat Province

Outline. What is IPM Principles of IPM Methods of Pest Management Economic Principles The Place of Pesticides in IPM

AN ANALYSIS OF TOMATO PRODUCTION COST AND LABOR FORCE PRODUCTIVITY IN TURKEY

GRASSLAND AND FORAGE CROP CULTIVATION IN TURKISH AGRICULTURE. Engin TAN

Commercial Fruit Production. Essential Commercial Fruit Production Decisions

EDUCATION INFORMATION. Ege University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science Department of Farm Structures and Irrigation/2008

A.17. OXIDIZING PROPERTIES (SOLIDS)

FIELD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

GROUNDWATER BANKING AN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR WATER SECURITY IN CALIFORNIA

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Effect of Using Magnetized Treated Water in Irrigation of Bell Pepper and Beans in AL-Jeftlik Area / West Bank Palestine

Determination of Forage Yield Performance of Some Promising Narbon Vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) Lines under Rainfed Conditions in Southeastern Turkey

New development of automation for agricultural machinery

STRESS ANALYSIS ON TRANSMISSION GEARS OF A ROTARY TILLER USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Onion & Leek Planting Guide

Impact of dry seeding with alternate wetting and drying on rice productivity and profitability in Punjab-Pakistan

Disintegration in composting conditions of The NatureUrn Final report

Strawberry Production Basics: Matted Row

Name: PLSOIL 105 & 106 First Hour Exam February 27, Part A. Place answers on bubble sheet. 2 pts. each.

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

Mediterranean region. Contents WATER FOOTPRINT OF TOURISM AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN TURKEY

Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage Application in Greenhouse Climatization

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS General Directorate for Agriculture Production and Development

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Integrated Pest Management

Agro-One Soil Analysis

SCHEDULE C FORAGE PRODUCTION PLAN

TEZA DE DOCTORAT Mariana POPA SUMMARY

Doğu Çamur Accepted: July ISSN : etemgurel@gmail.com Karabuk-Turkey

Wheat Farming: Then and Now

To complete the organization for all agricultural activities MARO has daughter companies such as

These calculations are on a hectare basis or for a given size of an experimental plot.

Soybean Marketing & Production College, Minneapolis, MN. isafarmnet.com

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT WITH DRIP AND SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

DYNAMIX COMPACT DISC HARROWS FOR TRACTORS FROM 100 TO 200 HP

Management JBiopest 5(1): of 1-6 rice yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Walker using some biorational insecticides

Unit A: General Agricultural Machinery. Lesson 1: Machinery and Equipment

Published 2005 INTRODUCTION

ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

How To Manage Alfalfa

MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN

An Analysis of Relation Between Economic Growth and Democratization: An Empiric Application (A Sample of Turkey)

Quality requirements for wood ash as K component in recycled NPK fertilizers

IHARF Box 156 Indian Head, SK. S0G 2K0 Ph: (306)

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

TEA IN TURKEY Hamit Vanli

Science of Life Explorations

Comparison of Production Costs and Resource Use for Organic and Conventional Production Systems

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND APPLICATION OF HYDROLOGICAL MODELING TOOLS AT A WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SITE IN NAM DINH, VIETNAM

K component in recycled NPK fertilizers

Chapter D9. Irrigation scheduling

Soybean roulette: improving the odds for maximizing soybean yields

Crop residue management (CRM), a cultural practice that

Chemical nutrient analysis of different composts (Vermicompost and Pitcompost) and their effect on the growth of a vegetative crop Pisum sativum

St John Site, No-Till

Transcription:

TÜRK TARIM ve DOĞA BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ TURKISH JOURNAL of AGRICULTURAL and NATURAL SCIENCES www.turkjans.com Investigation of Alternative Weed Management Methods in Organic Vineyards of The Aegean Region a Koray KAÇAN*, b Özhan BOZ* a Bornova Plant Protection Research Station, İzmir, Turkey, b Department of Plant Protection, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey *Corresponding author: koraykacan@gmail.com Abstract This work was done during 2009-2011 in Manisa. The aim of work was detemination of weeds in the organic production in vineyards and determine method of control weeds. The effect of some weed control methods was evaluated in organically grown vineyards. The tested methods in the organic weed control methods included application of textile mulch, straw, sawdust, peanut shells, hairy vetch, flame burning, olive water, tractor hoeing, hand hoeing, barley-vetch mixed cultivation and cabbage residues application. The effect of organic methods on weeds, yield, quality and the physical and chemical properties of soil was determined. The soil analysis of organic treatments indicated that highest phosphorus (P) was noted in olive processing waste application while highest organic matter was recorded in vetch + barley and olive processing waste applications. Highest values for potassium were noted in tractor hoeing and olive processing waste application. High levels of iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) were recorded with application of cabbage residues application. Additionally, the cost of treatments application was determined. The economical analysis indicated that the most economical treatment was application of barley + vetch (35.5%). This treatment was followed by the other low cost applications including hairy vetch (26.8%), barley + vetch (25.5%), cabbage residues (18.30%), textile mulch (14:38%), tractor hoeing (13.1%) and groundnut shell (9.1%) applications, respectively. The other conventional treatments such as burning, straw, sawdust and hand hoeing were found to be more costly. The results of this work indicates that textile mulch application were the most effective weed control treatments for organic productions systems, respectively. These applications were found to have higher yield than the other applications. The application of textile mulch and mixed cultivation of barley + vetch was economical than the conventional applications and can be recommended for weed control in organic production systems. Key Words: Vineyards, Grape, Weed, Mulching, Cover crop, Herbicide, Physical control, Mechanical control. Investigation of Alternative Weed Management Methods in Organic Vineyards of The Aegean Region Özet Bu çalışma, 2009-2011 yıllarında Manisa ilinde geleneksel ve organik üzüm üretim yapılan bağlarda sorun olan yabancı otların saptanması ve bu yabancı otlara karşı mücadele yöntemlerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Organik bağ alanında bazı mücadele yöntemlerin etkisini belirlemek amacıyla da çalışmalar yürütülmüştür. Organik mücadele yöntemlerinde ise malç tekstili, saman, talaş, yer fıstığı kabuğu, tüylü fiğ, alevle yakma, zeytin karasuyu, traktör çapası, el çapası, arpa-fiğ karışık ekimi ve lahana artığı uygulamaları yer almıştır. Çalışmada organik uygulamaların yabancı otlara, verim, kalite kriterleri ve toprağın fiziksel ve kimyasal özelliklerine etkileri de belirlenmiştir. Organik uygulamaların toprağa etkileri incelendiğinde; en yüksek fosfor (P) zeytin karasuyu uygulamasından, en yüksek organik madde miktarı arpa + fiğ ve zeytin karasuyu uygulamalarından elde edilmiştir. Potasyum (K) değerleri incelendiğinde ise en yüksek değerler traktör çapası ve zeytin karasuyu uygulamalarında belirlenmiştir. Lahana artığı uygulamasında demir (Fe) ve mangan (Mn) miktarının yüksek düzeylerde olduğu kaydedilmiştir. Maliyet analizi sonucunda kontrole oranla en ekonomik uygulama arpa + fiğ (% 35,5) olurken, bunu sırasıyla tüylü fiğ (% 26,8), arpa + fiğ (% 25,5), lahana artıkları (% 18,30), malç tekstili (% 14,38), traktör çapası (% 13,1) ve yer fıstığı kabuğu (% 9,1) uygulamaları izlemiştir. Diğer uygulamalar olan yakma, saman, talaş ve el çapası uygulamalarının geleneksel herbisit uygulamalarından daha yüksek maliyetli oldukları belirlenmiştir. Yürütülen bu çalışma sonucunda geleneksel yetiştirme koşullarında 1369

sonbahar toprak işlemesi + glyphosate uygulaması ve organik yetiştirmede malç tekstili uygulamasının yabancı ot mücadelesi için en etkili uygulamalar olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu uygulamaların diğer uygulamalardan daha yüksek verim oluşturduğu da belirlenmiştir. Malç tekstili, arpa + fiğ karışık ekimi ve tüylü fiğ uygulamalarının maliyet bakımından geleneksel uygulamalardan daha az maliyetli olduğu ve organik yetiştiricilikte yabancı ot kontrolünde tavsiye edilebileceği belirlenmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Bağ, Üzüm, Yabancı ot, Malçlama, Örtücü bitki, Herbisit, Fiziksel mücadele, Mekanik mücadele Introduction In order to adequately meet the nutritional requirements of world population, the agricultural land is required to be used in alternative ways while integrated control methods are required to be investigated. The use of organic crop products is increasing day by day, while the growing of crops organically is increasing in the world as well as Turkey with each passing day. In 2012, the area under organic crops increased by 14.4% compared with the data of 2005 (i.e. 203811 ha to 707909 ha) while the organic crop products were increased by 5.5% (i.e. 421934 tons to 1750120 tons) (Anonim, 2012). The direct yield losses due to weeds in orchards are 1.1% (Cramer, 1967). The weeds uptake the water which necessary for crops; and hence, for producing 1 kg dry matter, weeds uptake 600 liter water (Oraman, 1959). Particularly, the weeds competition water becomes dangerous when the water shortage is getting worse in the world. Many of the weeds in orchard, especially Cirsium arvense uptake higher N, P, and K than the vines (Farkhadi, 1968). While root exudates of Sonchus arvensis inhibit the root growth of vine (Racz and Siaba, 1971). For Turkey, grape is an important agricultural export product while weeds have done both the direct and indirect yield losses to grape. This study was aimed to determine the effects of some alternative weed control practices in the organic vineyards in Manisa on the weed dry weight. The organic control methods evaluated were; textile mulch, straw mulch, sawdust, peanut shells, hairy vetch, torching, olive, tractor hoeing, hand hoeing, barley, and vetch and cabbage mixed cultivation (intercropping). The effect of organic weed control on soil physical and chemical properties, yield and quality of grapes and the economics was determined. Materials and Methods With the objective of finding out the most suitable weed control practices in organically grown orchards, experiments were conducted for two consecutive years (2010-2011) in Manisa (Sultaniye). The organic control methods evaluated were; textile mulch, straw mulch, sawdust, peanut shells, hairy vetch, torching, olive, tractor hoeing, hand hoeing, barley, and vetch and cabbage mixed cultivation (intercropping). The soil properties of the experimental were recorded by taking soil samples before and after the experiments. The experiment was conducted with Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications and plot size of 6 x 9=54 m 2 (six vinestocks), and a distance was left among the parcels to avoid Cover Crop Applications: In autumn vetch (Vicia sativa) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) were seeded in mixture with seed rate of 60 kg/hectare vetch and 5 kg/hectare of barley; hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) was planted alone with seed rate of 8 kg/hectare. Application of textile mulch: Textile mulch (0.3 mm, 200 m x 1.50 m, 45 g/m 2 ) was used in plots with 3 m width and 9 m length, covered with a perforated black polyethylene sheet (in two pieces), hence covering the area of 54m 2. Application of Peanut Shell: Peanut shells were applied in the early spring at rate 5000 kg per hectare with a 10 cm thick layer on the soil so that sunlight does not pass through it. Straw Application: The straw collected from the local wheat fields were spread in the field in 10 cm layer (so that the sunlight does not reach the soil surface). The straw was spread in spring season at 300 kg/hectare The expriment was checked throughout the season and any of the spaces were filled with additional mulch. Sawdust application: The timber remains were collected from carpentry and were applied in a 10 cm layer (to avoid sunlight to reach soil) during the spring season at 4000 kg/hectare any of the spaces produced during the experimental period were re-filled with additional material. Application of olive waste: The solid olive wastes were collected from olive oil manufacturing factory, dried, crushed and sieved. These materials were then spread on the soil surface during spring season at 3 kg/m 2 creating a layer of 0-20 cm. The dose of olive waste was decided based on work of Aydin et al. (2001) who investigated the suitable dozes of herbicides and olive wastes. The analysis of olive waste indicated that it had: ; EC 16,400 ms/cm, ph 5,82, Organic matter % 42,12, N % 1,78, K % 1,15 and Ca % 1,43. 1370

Application of cabbage remains: The cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) remains collected from another field were applied at 5000 kg/hectare These straw remains were applied in the early spring season and incorporated into the soil with a tractor mounted rotary. Experiment plots that was checked through of season and refilled instead of mulch added material was made. Flame application: The flame was applied for burning the weeds at the start of spring season when the broadleaved weeds were at 4-6 leaves stage; while the flame was applied for narrow leaved weeds when weeds were at tillering stage. The combustion process was done using butane gas at 675 kg/hectare for 20 min in each parcel. Hand hoeing: The hand hoeing was done during the spring season when the broadleaved weeds were at 4-6 leaves stage and the narrow leaved weeds were at tillering stage. Hoeing with tractor. The hoeing with tractor was done with a 5-tined plow and rotary during the spring season. The number of weeds was counted from each parcel at 5 places from an area of 50 x 50 cm2 at 14th, 28th and 56th days after treatment application. The weeds were harvested from the same areas to calculate the % control effect using the Abbott's formula: Weeds dry weight Weeds dry weight in treated field % Effect = ---------------------------------------------X 100 Weeds number in control dry weights The harvested weeds were immediately taken to laboratory to record fresh weight, and then put in the oven at 70 ºC for 48 hours. Later, the dry weight of weeds was recorded and the% effect of applied treatments was calculated based on the fresh and dry weights recorded in the treatment plots and the untreated control. Figure 1. Weights of weeds in plots Results As show the figure 1. In 2010, mulch textile and control showed the lowest and the highest dry weight of weeds in inter row respectively. Other application showed a 37.4-83.3 gr/m 2 dry weight. In 2011, in the same way the application of mulch textile was obtained the lowest dry weight of weeds in inter row. In intra row, application of mulch textile showed lowest dry weight (0 gr/m 2 ) in 2010. Other control methods were obtained for dry weights 55-213 gr/m 2 in plots. 2011, mulch textile and control showed the lowest and the highest dry weight of weeds in intra row respectively. Effect of weed control methods on dry weight of weeds in plots were presented in Table 2. The evaluation of data on inter-row and intra-row weed dry weight were recorded from the organic vineyards. According to statistics analysis, field 1371

applied weed control methods indicated that years effect was significant Application of textile mulch was the most effective weed control treatment which had a 100% effect as indicated by the data recorded from 1 m 2 In 2010. Other application showed a 37.4-83.3 gr/m 2 dry weight. In 2011, in the same way the Along with this treatment, the other applications showed a 38-73% effect. In inter row. The lowest effect was obtained from cabbage (20%). Hoeing with tractor application didn t effect in the plots. The highest effect (100%) was noted for textile mulch. The lowest effect was recorded for cabbage (39%). The other treatments showed an effect of 51-79% in 2011. application of mulch textile was obtained the lowest dry weight of weeds in inter row. In intra row, application of mulch textile showed lowest dry weight (0 gr/m 2 ) in 2010. Other control methods were obtained for dry weights 55-213 gr/m 2 in plots. 2011, mulch textile and control showed the lowest and the highest dry weight of weeds in intra row respectively. Intra row, the highest effect was recorded for textile mulch (100%), the lowest effect was for flame burning (11%). The other treatments had a 52-77% effect. In 2010. In same way. the textile mulch had the highest effect in 2011. However, the lowest effect was recorded for olive waste. Other applications showed a 39-76% effect. Figure 2. Effect of weed control methods in plots. Effect of different weed control practices on the yield and quality of organic vineyard The graph shows the effect of applied weed However, the differences in yield for the treatments control practices in the organic vineyard area in were not significant. In comparison with control, Manisa during 2010 and 2011. The results in the the highest yield was recorded for textile, straw and graph show that the grapes yield per hectare was sawdust mulch applications. The lowest yield was increased by the applied weed control treatments. recorded for flame weeding. 1372

Figure 3. Effects of weed control methods on yield. Results The results of organic weed control indicated that: the results were similar to the two years, the effect was much higher for organic weed control than the conventional one. According to data, the respective importance of methods was as: textile mulch, straw, sawdust, peanut shells, barley + vetch and hairy vetch. The results of this work indicate that, textile mulch application was the most effective weed control treatments for organic productions. These applications were found to have higher yield than the other applications. The application of textile mulch and mixed cultivation of barley + vetch was economical than the conventional applications and can be recommended for weed control in organic production systems. References Anonim, 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Production Crops. [http://faostat.fao.org/] Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.1013.Ball, D.M., Collins, M., Lacefield G.D., Martin, NP., Mertens, D.A., Olson, K.E., Putnam, D.H., Undersander, D.J., Wolf, M.W., 2001. Understanding forage quality. American Cramer, H.H. 1967. Plant protection and world crop production. Pflanzenschutz Nacrichten Bayer 1967. 1. Farben Fabriken Bayer A.G. Leverkusen, p. 524. Oraman, M.N.1959. Yeni Bağcılık. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yayınları, No: 78, Ankara Üniversitesi Matbaası, Ankara. Racz, J., Siaba, K. 1971. The allelopathic effect of weeds in the vineyards. Obstbau und Fruchtever Vertung 21(4): 264-268. 1373