Pacifica Graduate Institute Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Goal 1. Clinical Practice Domain To produce graduates who are prepared to effectively deliver multicultural diagnostic and therapeutic services that are informed and supported by evidence-based practices. Goal 2. Scholarly Inquiry and Research To produce graduates who are prepared to conduct and evaluate research within various quantitative and qualitative approaches and methods of research with a particular emphasis on qualitative research. Goal 3. Depth Psychology and the Humanities To produce graduates who demonstrate the ability to understand and practice the basic principles of psychotherapeutic treatment from psychoanalytic and Jungian analytic perspective. Time to Completion is a measure that is monitored by the Department of Education (DOE) to ensure that students are completing the requirements of the degree in a reasonable time frame. The analysis and summary are updated annually. PhD Time to Completion Rates 2012-2013 Capstones with Transition Points Capstone evaluations and any gateway transition points provide key evaluations throughout the program. Here students demonstrate individual achievement of the learning outcomes. 1. Comprehensive Examination: Clinical Practice, Research and Scholarly Inquiry, Jungian Dream Analysis, Dream Analysis from a Psychoanalytic Perspective 2. Concept Paper 3. Final Dissertation Faculty Council members evaluate the effectiveness of the program through Capstone Review Reports that aggregate individual scores into an annual summary. Planning that may include curriculum or teaching adjustments is then developed from any areas that indicate the need for more attention. Clinical Program Dissertation Time-to-Completion, 2005 2013 The Clinical Program has had 312 students receive an Approval of the Final Dissertation Draft between September 2005 and August 2013. The volume of dissertations approved as well as the decrease in
time-to-completion over 8 years demonstrates the commitment of both students and faculty to student achievement and to the student learning outcomes evaluated through the dissertation. 50 Clinical Dissertation Time to Completion 2005-2013 Months to Completion 40 30 43 40.4 40 36.6 37 32.5 34.7 30 20 10 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Academic Year of Completion Clinical Program Comprehensive Exam and 2013-2014 The Comprehensive Exam comprised 3 questions: One question each concerning clinical psychology, research psychology, and depth psychology. In order to pass, a student must achieve a minimum score of 80 (out of 100 points) from each of two faculty readers on each of three questions. If a student does not initially pass a question, a third reader is used to revisit the scoring of the question. Seventy-three students took the Clinical Comprehensive exam in the and academic years. Forty-five students took the Clinical Comprehensive exam in. Forty students passed the exam. Data about the number of students who needed to retake the exam in order to pass were unavailable. Twenty-eight students took the Clinical Comprehensive exam in. Twenty-four students passed the exam on the first take; four students needed to retake the exam. As of this reporting, 26 students had passed the exam and two others were awaiting completion of the examination process.
100 Comprehensive Exam and Question s (Max=100) 90 80 85.9 85.9 87.3 8 83.1 87.4 70 Q1 Q2 Q3 Each of the examination questions was graded on the basis of 10 components. Each component was graded on the basis of 10 points. Question 1: Clinical Practice 1. Quality of Internship Readiness Forms 2. Differential Diagnosis 3. Accuracy of DSM Diagnosis 4. Application of Evidence-Based Best Practices 5. Primary Case Formulation 6. Secondary Case Formulation 7. Integrative Case Formulation 8. Quality of Treatment Plan 9. Scholarly Writing 10. Multicultural Considerations 10.0 9.9 Comprehensive Exam and Clinical Psychology Question Component s 9.2 (Max=10) 8.0 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.3 8.1 7.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Clinical Psychology Question Component #
Question 2: Research and Scholarly Inquiry 1. Clarity of Research Focus, Objectives, and Methodology 2. Identification of Philosophical and Theoretical Backgrounds of the Methodology 3. Appropriate Selection of Participants 4. Ethical Awareness of Research Design 5. Multicultural Awareness of Research Design 6. Accuracy of Research Design Application 7 Accuracy of Data Analysis 8. Reflexivity in Research Design 9. Clinical Relevance of Research 10. Scholarly Writing 10.0 Comprehensive Exam 2012-2014 Research Psychology Question Component s (Max=10) 8.0 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.9 8.3 8.9 8.9 9.1 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 7.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Research Psychology Question Component # Question 3: Depth Psychology and the Humanities 1. Functional Knowledge of Jungian Dreamwork 2. Jungian Dreamwork Associations 3. Transference in Jungian Dreamwork 4. Amplification of Archetypal Material 5. Junigan Dreamwork in Psychotherapy Design 6. Understanding the Importance of the Unconscious in Psychoanalytic Dreamwork 7 Functional Knowledge of Psychoanalytic Dreamwork 8. Psychoanalytic Dreamwork Associations 9. Transference in Psychoanalytic Dreamwork 10. Psychoanalytic Dreamwork in Psychotherapy
10.0 (Max=10) 8.0 8.4 8.4 Comprehensive Exam and Depth Psychology Question Component s 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.3 7.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Depth Psychology Question Component # In addition to the exam scores, students were also evaluated on 4 program competencies. One competency was evaluated for each of the first two examination questions. The third examination question was linked to the evaluation of two competencies. Each competency was evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 points. Clinical Program Competencies Competency 1.2.1 Competency 2.1.1 Competency 3.1.2 Competency 3.2.3 Case formulation: Students will exhibit competency in developing case formulations which provide explanatory power in modeling and predicting human behavior. Student will demonstrate the ability to select, evaluate, critique and apply clinical research to guide evidence-based clinical practice. Students will demonstrate the ability to interpret dreams from a Jungian perspective. Students will demonstrate the ability to interpret dreams from a psychoanalytic perspective.
3 Comprehensive Exam and Competency s (Max=3) 2 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 1 0 C 1.2.1 C 2.1.1 C 3.1.2 C 3.2.3 Competency # Updated by Institutional Learning, 2014 04