How To Test For Stress Testing On A Web Application



Similar documents
Load Testing on Web Application using Automated Testing Tool: Load Complete

How To Test For Performance And Scalability On A Server With A Multi-Core Computer (For A Large Server)

Business white paper. HP Process Automation. Version 7.0. Server performance

Tableau Server 7.0 scalability

Load and Performance Testing

Agility Database Scalability Testing

SOLUTION BRIEF: SLCM R12.7 PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS JANUARY, Load Test Results for Submit and Approval Phases of Request Life Cycle

1. Technical requirements 2. Installing Microsoft SQL Server Configuring the server settings

System Requirements Table of contents

Performance Testing Tools: A Comparative Analysis

SOLUTION BRIEF: SLCM R12.8 PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS JANUARY, Submit and Approval Phase Results

Amazon EC2 XenApp Scalability Analysis

Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2013 R2 Sizing Guidelines for On-Premises Single Tenant Deployments

Table 1. Requirements for Domain Controller. You will need a Microsoft Active Directory domain. Microsoft SQL Server. SQL Server Reporting Services

Intel Xeon Processor 5560 (Nehalem EP)

Web Performance, Inc. Testing Services Sample Performance Analysis

Sage 300 ERP 2014 Compatibility guide

MS EXCHANGE SERVER ACCELERATION IN VMWARE ENVIRONMENTS WITH SANRAD VXL

Scalability Factors of JMeter In Performance Testing Projects

Hardware/Software Guidelines

Scalability. Microsoft Dynamics GP Benchmark Performance: Advantages of Microsoft SQL Server 2008 with Compression.

Summer Internship 2013 Group No.4-Enhancement of JMeter Week 1-Report-1 27/5/2013 Naman Choudhary

Application Performance Testing Basics

AgencyPortal v5.1 Performance Test Summary Table of Contents

Technical Writing - A Practical Case Study on ehl 2004r3 Scalability testing

AppDynamics Lite Performance Benchmark. For KonaKart E-commerce Server (Tomcat/JSP/Struts)

Enterprise Deployment: Laserfiche 8 in a Virtual Environment. White Paper

XenDesktop 7 Database Sizing

System Requirements for Microsoft Dynamics GP 2015

Informatica Data Director Performance

Sage ERP Accpac. Compatibility Guide Version 6.0. Revised: November 18, Version 6.0 Compatibility Guide

Hardware Sizing and Bandwidth Usage Guide. McAfee epolicy Orchestrator Software

PRODUCT BRIEF 3E PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS LOAD AND SCALABILITY TESTING

Adonis Technical Requirements

How To Test For Performance

Load/Stress Test Plan

Hardware/Software Requirements For Self-Hosting Multi Server

System Requirements for Microsoft Dynamics SL 2015

Cisco Unified Workforce Optimization for Cisco Unified Contact Center Express 8.0

Dell Microsoft Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing Reference Configuration Performance Results Phase III

DMS Performance Tuning Guide for SQL Server

System requirements for A+

LabStats 5 System Requirements

Performance Characteristics of VMFS and RDM VMware ESX Server 3.0.1

INSTALLING SQL SERVER 2012 EXPRESS WITH ADVANCED SERVICES FOR REDHORSE CRM

An Oracle White Paper March Load Testing Best Practices for Oracle E- Business Suite using Oracle Application Testing Suite

TheraDoc v4.6.1 Hardware and Software Requirements

Development of Monitoring and Analysis Tools for the Huawei Cloud Storage

A Comparison of Oracle Performance on Physical and VMware Servers

Test Run Analysis Interpretation (AI) Made Easy with OpenLoad

An Oracle Benchmarking Study February Oracle Insurance Insbridge Enterprise Rating: Performance Assessment

Performance Testing. Why is important? An introduction. Why is important? Delivering Excellence in Software Engineering

Delivering Quality in Software Performance and Scalability Testing

Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 Guide to features and requirements

Bringing Value to the Organization with Performance Testing

JBoss Data Grid Performance Study Comparing Java HotSpot to Azul Zing

VirtualCenter Database Performance for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 VirtualCenter 2.5

Very Large Enterprise Network, Deployment, Users

Scaling Database Performance in Azure

Transitioning from a Physical to Virtual Production Environment. Ryan Miller Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp

A Comparison of Oracle Performance on Physical and VMware Servers

HOW MANY USERS CAN I GET ON A SERVER? This is a typical conversation we have with customers considering NVIDIA GRID vgpu:

Kentico CMS 6.0 Performance Test Report. Kentico CMS 6.0. Performance Test Report February 2012 ANOTHER SUBTITLE

Sage Compatibility guide. Last revised: October 26, 2015

Uptime Infrastructure Monitor. Installation Guide

Web Server (IIS) Requirements

Resource Monitoring During Performance Testing. Experience Report by Johann du Plessis. Introduction. Planning for Monitoring

Synergis Software 18 South 5 TH Street, Suite 100 Quakertown, PA , version

Asta Powerproject Enterprise

Legal Notices Introduction... 3

OTM in the Cloud. Ryan Haney

<Insert Picture Here> Oracle NoSQL Database A Distributed Key-Value Store

Assima Atlantic Link Technical Specifications

Glendale Community College Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 Initiative Vision/Scope Document. Version 1.0

Password Reset PRO INSTALLATION GUIDE

Maximizer CRM 2015 system requirements

HP Intelligent Management Center Standard Software Platform

Larger, active workgroups (or workgroups with large databases) must use one of the full editions of SQL Server.

Introduction 1 Performance on Hosted Server 1. Benchmarks 2. System Requirements 7 Load Balancing 7

WHAT WE NEED TO START THE PERFORMANCE TESTING?

Sage ERP Accpac. Compatibility Guide Versions 5.5 and 5.6. Revised: November 18, Compatibility Guide for Supported Versions

ECCAIRS 5 Technical Course. Minimal System Requirements. Minimal System Requirements. Server Installation and Configuration

SP Apps Performance test Test report. 2012/10 Mai Au

.NET 3.0 vs. IBM WebSphere 6.1 Benchmark Results

Pearl Echo Installation Checklist

8 Common Myths About Performance Testing in Production Don t Let These Misconceptions Keep You From Production Testing.

GFI Product Manual. Deployment Guide

Historian SQL Server 2012 Installation Guide

Performance Analysis and Capacity Planning Whitepaper

Ignify ecommerce. Item Requirements Notes

Dragon NaturallySpeaking and citrix. A White Paper from Nuance Communications March 2009

Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2013 R2 Sizing Guidelines for Multitenant Deployments

White Paper. Scalability Results. Select the hardware configuration that s right for your organization to optimize performance

Windows with Microsoft SQL Server Performance Load Testing on Clarity Technical White Paper

MS SQL Installation Guide

Pervasive PSQL Vx Server Licensing

AlphaTrust PRONTO - Hardware Requirements

Taking the First Steps in. Web Load Testing. Telerik

Transcription:

Web Application Stress Testing with Blaise Internet Jim O Reilly Westat International Blaise Users Conference Annapolis Maryland, USA September 28, 2007

Introduction Focus: web application stress testing ti tools, methods, tests t and lessons learned Benefits of stress testing Realistic simulation of performance of server and application under varying numbers of concurrent users Valuable information on suitability of the server configuration for specific requirements of a survey Potential in usability testing and paradata analysis Test results presented here highly dependent on Size and complexity of the data models Server platform Your mileage may vary 2

Planning and Configuring a Web Survey Calculating l server capacity essential Respondent cooperation crucial Web surveys often long and complex Lags processing pages on server drive Rs away Server capacity complex Processors, memory, speed etc. Application performance that meets needs of study is core Done by stress testing Blaise 4.8 internet system enhancements offer improved scalability -- widening i potential ti uses of Blaise 3

Peak Concurrent Users Key metric for server configuration Klaus Salchner : http://aspnet.4guysfromrolla.com/articles/062304-1.aspx#postadlink Peak = three times average concurrent users 4

Microsoft Web Application Stress Tool Freeware, unsupported by Microsoft Google web application stress testing for links Capable, adaptable, suits Blaise testing situations 5

How WAS works Runs on user workstation ti using MS Access database Records web application session Captures all http traffic Messages generated by user and responses returned Testing a script Set parameters--# of users; test times, etc. As script runs, WAS records timing and result codes of script-server interactions Reports on tests generated One workstation can simulate hundreds of web users 6

Stress Test Methodology Follow Blaise team approach reported in Blaise 4.8 Online Assistant at Test results for web server performance Key measure: increase in waiting time per page between Baseline WAS test with one user and Tests of incrementing levels of concurrent users 7

Test Steps Record Blaise Internet t survey session script with WAS In WAS Set script ss page delay to a constant value reflecting expected average time users take reading, thinking, entering, and pressing Next 10 seconds per field on a page used (for pages that post to the IS page handler) Run benchmark single user test for one hour successive one hour tests increasing # of users Extract count of pages sent from reports Calculate results for session series 8

Test series Table 1: Data models & WAS scripts Signals/ BMI size IS Script Fields Checks (kb) Pages Pages BRFS 41 0 18 20 17 Wes1 640 29 543 83 31 Wes2 370 22 297 221 177 Server: one Intel Xeon 1.3 Ghz processor and 1Gb of RAM, running Windows 2003 Server 9

Table 2: Stress test of BRFS (60 minutes with average posted page delay of 22.2 seconds) Extra Users Pages TPP* TPP 1 536 6.72 0.0 25 13268 678 6.78 007 0.07 50 25016 7.20 0.48 60 28140 7.68 0.96 70 30580 8.24 1.52 80 30568 9.42 2.71 90 30876 10.49 3.78 100 25397 14.17 7.46 200 25555 28.17 21.46 250 27620 32.59 25.87 *TPP = (Min*60*Users)/Pages 10

Table 3. Stress Test of Wes1 and Wes2 (60 minutes, average posted page delay of 23.2 & 11.8 seconds) Users Pages TPP* Extra TPP Users Pages TPP* Extra TPP 1 454 7.93 1 373 9.65 5 2256 7.98 0.0 5 1867 9.64 0.0 10 4449 8.09 0.2 10 3630 9.92 0.3 15 6368 8.48 0.6 15 5561 9.71 0.1 20 7659 9.40 1.5 20 7366 9.77 0.1 25 8513 10.57 2.6 25 8503 10.58 0.9 30 8845 12.21 4.3 30 9296 11.62 2.0 35 8882 14.19 6.3 35 10098 12.48 2.8 40 8922 16.14 8.2 40 10829 13.30 3.6 45 9184 17.64 9.7 45 11454 14.14 4.5 50 9336 19.28 11.4 50 13693 13.15 3.5 *TPP = (Min*60*Users)/Pages 11

Wes1 & Wes2 Test Comparison Increased Seconds Per Page by Number of Users Wes1 and Wes2 Applications 7.0 6.0 Increase ed TPP 5.0 4.0 30 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0-1.0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Users/Threads Wes1 Wes2 12

Wes1 & Wes2 Test Comparison (2) Better Wes2 performance 40% fewer fields, less complex rules, more pages Follow up plans Add second VM server running as IS rules server More powerful server configurations Signals/ BMI size IS Script Fields Checks (kb) Pages Pages BRFS 41 0 18 20 17 Wes1 640 29 543 83 31 Wes2 370 22 297 221 177 13

Blaise Team s Tests Reported in OLA Datamodel of 1900 fields with routing and checks Peaked at 50 users with no dedicated rules server 100 users with one rules server 150 users with two rules server Server with two 2.8 GHz processors, 4 GB RAM 14

WAS and Other Types of Application Testing Question raised on how an application would feel to a user if run at the same time as a WAS test. Ran Wes2 with 15 users and launched another survey interview interactively. Impressions: Performance OK -- page delay ~1 second, occasionally 3-4 seconds Found functional anomaly; in enumerated items, up/down arrow key in browser didn t work SN unable to replicate the problem Suggest possible use in usability testing? Check app look and feel under stress 15

WAS and COM WAS has COM interface; open to automation ti Built simple VB app to run series of tests Enables high volume testing 16

WAS Database Detailed data on testst MS Access 95 Difficult to work with directly WAS provides access to script pages to change ResponseDelay etc. VB/other apps can access directly Mdb also flexible for reading or export data using SQL Server and Crystal Reports etc. 17

Other Metrics for Blaise Internet Stress Testing Blaise team s stress testing ti approach WAS scripts, fixed page delays, one hour tests, examining time per page at different user levels Elegant, easy to implement and track, especially with WAS automation Tracking interviewing information during WAS series Other possible insights on process # of completed cases Stats on interview times avg, min, max, stddev Journal data on for every page sent from server Page-level stats of potential value timing distribution, outliers etc as indicators of page structure issues 18

Linking interviewing and WAS testing In workshop enable journaling process Set data model primary key to tie interview to journal Modify interview starter page to assign web server session id as primary key Function CreateOptions(Hosts)... If UseRunTimeOptions Then... '*** setting sessionid as primary key Dim scaseid scaseid = Session.SessionID RootNode.setAttribute "KeyValue", scaseid '***... End Function 19

Conclusions Stress testing ti Blaise Internet t with WAS system Relatively easy to implement and use Valuable approach to understanding the expected performance of Blaise Internet for both specific applications and different server configurations. Able to demonstrate to clients whether the Blaise web survey system is ready to meet their needs. Potential for usability testing processing or paradata analysis with journal information. 20