CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2014-2015 FLOWER MOUND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Ms. Gayle Nurre, Principal
Campus Improvement Plan 2014-15 CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN: Continuous Improvement NOTE: All Title I Schools Each Title I school wide program plan is developed with the involvement of parents and other members of the community to be served and individuals who will carry out the plan. These individuals include teachers, principals, administrators, administrators of other Title I programs and other school staff. If the plan relates to a secondary campus, students from such campus are included in the planning process. School: Flower Mound Elementary Enter the date of completion Friday, June 05, 2015 District Vision: All of our students enjoy thriving, productive lives in a future they create. District Mission: Students, staff, and community... In the space below, please attach your campus "Accountability Summary" and "System Safeguards" Report provided by TEA. This data is to be used in making subsequent decisions in your Campus Improvement Plan. flowermoundaccount.pdf, 112 safeguards.pdf Goal #1: Achievement of all students, as measured by standardized tests and classroom performance, shall continually improve. Particular emphasis shall be placed on reading, writing, mathematics, science, and social studies. Select the choices that apply for your campus. Student Test Data will be disaggregated by faculty and staff to identify student needs.(title 1 components #1-CNA and #8-A), Intensive accelerated instruction will be provided to students not meeting minimum expectations. Include tutorials, summer schools, mentor programs, response to intervention, etc. (Title I component #9-M), Parents will be notified about academic progress through teacher/parent conference, what school will do, what parents can do, progress reports, report cards, et. Provide full opportunities for the participation of all parents in a format and, to the extent practicable, in a language that the parents understand. (Title I component#6- PI), Failure rates (grades - not TAKS) will be used to identify students' needs, and students at risk. (Title 1 components #1- CNA and #8-A), Establish a K-12 vertical team to facilitate effective instructional alignment and improvements specific to all standardized testing.(title I component#2- RS), Provide strategies to attract highly qualified teachers to high need students. (Title I component#5- R/R), Provide instruction by highly qualified teachers. (Title I component #3-HQ), Provide professional development for campus staff in assisting all students to meet the state s challenging content and student performance standards. (Title I component#4- PD), Ensure smooth transition for students from early childhood programs and from elementary to middle school and middle to high school. (Title I component #7-T), Strategies for utilizing teachers regarding the use of academic assessments for providing information and improving the achievement of individual students are employed. (Title 1 Component #8 - A) Additional Data, Title 1 explanations, comments, etc. Use the space below to enter information specific to your campus related to the above goal. All campuses who failed to meet a safeguard based on their 2014 testing data must describe strategies to address the safeguard. Title I campuses must utilize the space below to describe how their Title I funds will be used to provide opportunities for all students to meet the state's passing standard and advanced level of student achievement on STAAR. In the space below, please attach your campus "Texas Accountability Performance Report (TAPR) " Report provided by the assessment department. This data is to be used in making subsequent decisions in your Campus Improvement Plan. TAPR 112.pdf Goal #2 -All students shall attend school regularly. Select all choices that apply Parents, the staff and the student body are informed of student attendance laws and procedures. (90% rule, Truancy Laws and District Policies), A process is used to refer students with excessive absences to the counseling and/or health services departments., Truancy charges are regularly filed when appropriate., Parent notification is given when students are absent., Student incentive programs are used to improve attendance., Student residency is verified., Staff development is offered to appropriate personnel to help facilitate achievement of this goal., Strategies are implemented to increase parental involvement. Title I component (Title 1 Component #6-PI), Training is provided for parents regarding how to utilize technology to monitor student progress and achievement. (Title 1 Component #6 - PI)
Additional Data, Title 1 explanations, comments, etc. Use the space below to enter information specific to your campus related to the above goal. Title I campuses must jointly develop, with the parents of children served under Title I, Part A, a school-parent compact as a component of its written parental involvement policy. In the space below, Title I campuses must describe how they will revise and implement their school-parent compact and parental involvement policy. Title 1 campuses should also describe parental involvement activities/strategy will be for the upcoming school year, as decided in the campus improvement planning process. In the space below Title 1 campuses can upload their school-parent compact and parental involvement policy. Goal #3- All LISD students shall complete high school. The dropout rate for all the students including sub-populations will be maintained at <0.2% for middle schools and high schools will have a 95% completion rate. Select all choices that apply. At-risk students will be identified using available data., Students will be provided opportunities to explore career options., Drop-out prevention strategies, such as Personal Graduation Plans and other specific programs will be used to encourage students to stay in school., Utilize the RtI process to provide early intervention for struggling students. (Title 1 Component #9 - M), Students will be engaged in college and career readiness activities to promote the goal of high school completion and workforce readiness. Additional Data, Title 1 explanations, comments, etc. Use the space below to enter information specific to your campus related to the above goal. Title 1 campuses who are expending resources on strategies related to this goal, must describe below how their resources will be used and the anticipated impact. Goal #4- Students shall feel safe and positive about their learning environment Select all choices that apply The school safety plan is developed and monitored for effectiveness throughout the school year. (Review by police, fire drills, lock downs, etc.)., Students receive public acknowledgement for non-academic achievement., Discipline records are used to plan programs that address disciplinary needs, (violence prevention, mediation, conflict resolution)., Students participate in activities that foster positive Teacher/Student relationships., The Student Code of Conduct is available on-line and copies are made available in the office for each student and reviewed with students by teachers., Students demonstrate skills of cooperation and conflict resolutions., Orientation is held from elementary to middle school and middle school to high school. (Title I component #7-T), Civic responsibility and community service and community involvement are encouraged., Counselors work with students to make appropriate curricular choices or program choices., Students will expand their involvement in extracurricular and co-curricular activities., Students are aided in their transition from elementary school to middle school, and middle school to high school through vertical conversations, teacher collaboration and professional learning.(t1 component #7-T) Additional Data, Title 1 explanations, comments, etc. Use the space below to enter information specific to your campus related to the above goal. Goal #5 - Diverse students shall be prepared to meet the demands of the real world when they exit Lewisville Independent School District. Select all choices that apply Special program students are accurately identified and appropriately served. (Special ed., LEAP, ELL), ESL students are served on our campus, Special Education students are served on our campus, Title 1 students are served on our campus, LEAP students are served on our campus, A plan is in place to accurately identify students for special programs. (Program serving diverse students include, but are not limited to the following: Gifted and Talented, At-Risk, Bilingual/ESL, Dyslexia, Special Education, Counseling, other special funded programs)., Campus personnel utilizes appropriate interventions for students with special needs., The RtI Team is in place and appropriately trained to serve students., Teachers receive training and support to differentiate instruction to meet the needs of all students. (Title I component #2-SR), The following resources are used to meet the needs of special students: 504, Inclusion, Contact Teachers, LEAP services, Advanced Placement and Dyslexia Additional Data, Title 1 explanations, comments, etc. Use the space below to enter information specific to your campus related to the above goal. CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN: Focused Improvement Campus Mission In the box below write the campus mission statement. FME Students, Parents and Staff, along with local Community members, work to design and implement a learning organization that provides engaging, relevant academic experiences everyday.
***All goals described below should be accomplished in one school year. Please set at least 2 goals which should be tied to the goals being focused on in the Strategic Design document.**** Strategic Design Goals Select the specific result(s) that your goals are focused on. Goal 2: Engage learners through the use of technological tools to access, create and share content as well as collaborate with others learners throughout the world., Goal 4: Create flexible systems that result in a learning organization supported by innovative and engaged staff., Goal 5: Continuously involve our diverse community, staff and students to use their strengths, resources and talents to provide engaging, innovative experiences for all learners. Campus Goal #1 Describe a goal specific to your campus in the box below. LISD Strategic Design Goal 2.2 Objectives Describe the objectives for Goal 1. The staff of FME will provide relevant experiences in all core subject areas, which includes technology based, kinesthetic, hands on, project based learning and other engagement tools to continue to allow students to advance in achievement. This will be measured by STAAR and DRA scores. Action Plan Describe the actions/activities your school will take to achieve the objectives related to the goal. 1.Provide staff with Appy Hours provided once a month within Wednesday staff meetings in order to share new technology with staff. 2.Teachers will introduce a grade appropriate production app each 9 weeks, such as, PicCollage, Sock Puppets, Poppet, Edmodo, Screen Chomps, etc. with students given the opportunity to submit and/ share their creations electronically with teachers, peers and community including e-portfolio. 3. FME staff will require each student to participate in one project based learning each semester. The student will be required to show his/her knowledge in one core subject area. This will be noted in lesson plans. Campus Reflection In the box below, describe the campus reflection regarding progress achieved toward Goal 1. Campus Goal #2 Use the text box below to describe an area of campus need that you plan to focus on for the 2012-13 school year. After describing the area of campus need, describe the plan of action to address the need. LISD Strategic Design Goal #5.3 Objectives Describe the objectives for Goal 2. Flower Mound Elementary will make a direct connection with a business, a community organization, a local government entity, and a higher education institution as a collaborative partnership to enhance our 21st century learners. Actions/Activities Describe the actions/activities your school will take to achieve the objectives related to the goal. 1. Business Partnerships- Faculty members will establish personal contact with interested local business members to help share applicable knowledge. 2. Community Partnerships- Faculty will continue to build on established relationships with community partnerships to increase community involvement. 3. Local Governments- Faculty and Staff will connect with local government members to contribute to applicable topics aligned with current curriculum. Campus Reflection
In the box below, describe the campus reflection regarding progress achieved toward Goal 2. Campus Goal #3 Use the text box below to describe an area of campus need that you plan to focus on for the 2012-13 school year. After describing the area of campus need, describe the plan of action to address the need. LISD Strategic Design Goal 4.1 Flower Mound Elem will develop a comprehensive system to communicate with students, parents, and community in a manner representative of the district vision, mission and goals Objectives Describe the objectives for Goal 3. Concisely and consistenly communiate with faculty, parents, students, and community. Actions/Activities Describe the actions/activities your school will take to achieve the objectives related to the goal. 1, Monthly newsletter to parents available online and on FME website 2. Weekly communication - disseminated to each teacher and sent home on Fridays as well as weekly communications from classroom teachers via schoolweb or google. 3. Call Blast delivered by Principal for pertinent information, as appropriate 4. Remind 101 will be utilized by Principal and teachers (if desired) to share pertinent information. 5. School marquee will be updated as needed. 6. Staff members will share programs and products with the LISD communication dept. on a monthly basis. 7. BLT will meet 3 times per year to design, agree upon, and review critical issues and suggestions. Campus Reflection In the box below, describe the campus reflection regarding progress achieved toward Goal 3. Required Title I Components #1 - CNA: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment in order to design and implement a successful campus plan. #2 - RS: Implement school-wide reform strategies that are scientifically research based. #3 - HQ: Provide instruction by highly qualified teachers. #4 PD: Professional development for campus staff in assisting all students to meet the state s performance standards. #5 R/R: Provide strategies to attract highly qualified teachers to high need students. #6 - PI: Provide full opportunities for the participation of all parents in a format and, to the extent practicable, in a language that the parents understand. #7 - T: Ensure smooth-transition for students from one grade level to the next #8 - A: Teachers involved in decision-making about assessments #9 - M: Interventions for students to master state standards #10 - Coord: Coordination of funds from all sources History Started by Gayle Nurre at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Received by Rebecca MacDonald at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Received by Rhonda Godbey at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Received by Buddy Bonner at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Received by Kevin Rogers at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Received by Lori Rapp at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Received by Lezley Lewis at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Received by Charles Fruge at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Received by Sarah Fitzhugh at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Completed at 5/30/2014 10:00 AM Recalled by Gayle Nurre at 5/30/2014 10:05 AM Started by Gayle Nurre at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Received by Rebecca MacDonald at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Received by Rhonda Godbey at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Received by Buddy Bonner at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Received by Kevin Rogers at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Received by Lori Rapp at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Received by Lezley Lewis at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Received by Charles Fruge at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Received by Sarah Fitzhugh at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Completed at 5/30/2014 10:14 AM Remaining
2013 Accountability Summary FLOWER MOUND EL (061902112) - LEWISVILLE ISD Accountability Rating Met Standard Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on - Student Achievement - NONE - Student Progress - Closing Performance Gaps Distinction Designation Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA Percent of Eligible Measures in Top Quartile 1 out of 4 = 25% NO DISTINCTION EARNED Academic Achievement in Mathematics Percent of Eligible Measures in Top Quartile 1 out of 3 = 33% NO DISTINCTION EARNED 100 Performance Index Report Top 25 Percent Student Progress NO DISTINCTION EARNED 75 50 25 0 89 45 88 N/A Index 1 Student Achievement (Target Score=50) Index 2 Student Progress (Target Score=30) Index 3 Closing Performance Gaps (Target Score = 55) Index 4 Postsecondary Readiness (Target Score = 75) Campus Type Campus Size Campus Demographics Elementary 524 Students Grade Span EE - 05 Percent Economically Disadvantaged 12.8% Percent English Language Learners 2.3% Mobility Rate 5.3% Performance Index Summary System Safeguards Index Points Earned Maximum Points Index Score 1 - Student Achievement 654 732 89 2 - Student Progress 361 800 45 3 - Closing Performance Gaps 877 1,000 88 4 - Postsecondary Readiness N/A N/A N/A Number and Percent of Indicators Met Performance Rates 14 out of 14 = 100% Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100% Graduation Rates N/A Total 24 out of 24 = 100% For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division web site at http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 36 August 8, 2013
Performance Rates All Students African American Hispanic White TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2013 System Safeguards FLOWER MOUND EL (061902112) - LEWISVILLE ISD American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Econ Disadv Targets 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Special Ed ELL Total Met Total Eligible Percent of Eligible Measures Met Reading Y Y Y Y Y 5 5 100 Mathematics Y Y Y Y Y 5 5 100 Writing Y Y 2 2 100 Science Y Y 2 2 100 Social Studies 0 0 Total 14 14 100 Participation Rates Targets 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Reading Y Y Y Y Y 5 5 100 Mathematics Y Y Y Y Y 5 5 100 Total 10 10 100 Federal Graduation Rates (Target: See Reason Codes) Graduation Target Met 0 0 Reason Code ** Total 0 0 District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Overall 3% Modified 2% Alternate 1% Mathematics Overall 3% Modified 2% Alternate 1% Total N/A N/A N/A Overall Total 24 24 100 ** Federal Graduation Rate Reason Codes: a = Graduation Rate Goal of 90% b = Four-year Graduation Rate Target of 78% c = Safe Harbor Target of a 10% decrease in difference from the prior year rate and the Goal d = Five-year Graduation Rate Target of 83% Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria. TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 1 of 3 August 8, 2013
2013 System Safeguards FLOWER MOUND EL (061902112) - LEWISVILLE ISD Performance Rates All Students African American Hispanic White American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Econ Disadv Special Ed ELL Targets 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Reading Number Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above 249 7 29 188-15 - 10 27 15 * Total Tests 269 7 34 202-16 - 10 34 25 * % Met Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above 93% 100% 85% 93% - 94% - 100% 79% 60% * Mathematics Number Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above 240 7 31 178-16 - 8 29 19 5 Total Tests 270 7 34 203-16 - 10 35 25 6 % Met Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above 89% 100% 91% 88% - 100% - 80% 83% 76% 83% Writing Number Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above 81 * 8 62 - * - * 7 * * Total Tests 99 * 10 76 - * - * 11 * * % Met Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above 82% * 80% 82% - * - * 64% * * Science Number Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above 84 * 10 69 - * - * 9 5 * Total Tests 94 * 14 73 - * - * 12 8 * % Met Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above 89% * 71% 95% - * - * 75% 63% * Social Studies Number Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above - - - - - - - - - - - Total Tests - - - - - - - - - - - % Met Phase-in 1 Level 2 and above - - - - - - - - - - - Participation Rates Targets 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% Reading: 2012-2013 Assessments Number Participating 279 8 37 207-17 - 10 36 29 8 Total Students 283 8 37 211-17 - 10 37 29 8 Participation Rate 99% 100% 100% 98% - 100% - 100% 97% 100% 100% Mathematics: 2012-2013 Assessments Number Participating 280 8 37 208-17 - 10 37 29 8 Total Students 283 8 37 211-17 - 10 37 29 8 Participation Rate 99% 100% 100% 99% - 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% * Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ** When only one ethnic/race group is masked, then the second smallestethnic/race group is masked (regardless of size). - Indicates there are no studentsin the group. TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 2 of 3 August 29, 2013
2013 System Safeguards FLOWER MOUND EL (061902112) - LEWISVILLE ISD Federal Graduation Rates @ All Students African American Hispanic White 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2012 American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Econ Disadv Special Ed ELL (Ever HS) ELL (Current) Number Graduated - - - - - - - - - - - n/a Total in Class - - - - - - - - - - - - Graduation Rate - - - - - - - - - - - n/a 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2011 Number Graduated - - - - - - - - - - - n/a Total in Class - - - - - - - - - - - - Graduation Rate - - - - - - - - - - - n/a 5-year Longitudinal Cohort Extended Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2011 Number Graduated - - - - - - - - - - - n/a Total in Class - - - - - - - - - - - - Graduation Rate - - - - - - - - - - - n/a District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Alternate 1% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit Modified 2% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit Mathematics Alternate 1% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit Modified 2% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a @ Federal Graduation Rate Targets: Graduation Rate Goal of 90%, or Four-year Graduation Rate Target of 78%, or Safe Harbor Target of a 10% decrease in difference from the prior year rate and the Goal, or Five-year Graduation Rate Target of 83% * Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. ** When only one ethnic/race group is masked, then the second smallestethnic/race group is masked (regardless of size). - Indicates there are no studentsin the group. TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 3 of 3 August 29, 2013
2012-13 Texas Academic Performance Report District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2013 Accountability Rating: Met Standard
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Performance Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary African American Hispanic White American Indian State District Campus Asian ELL STAAR Percent at Phase-in 1 Level II or Above Grade 3 Reading 2013 81% 89% 94% * 100% 93% - 88% - * * 83% * 2012 78% 88% 94% * 100% 92% - * - 100% 80% 80% - Mathematics 2013 70% 75% 83% * 90% 78% - 100% - * * 83% * 2012 69% 79% 85% * 88% 82% - * - 100% 78% 60% - Pacific Islander Two or More Races Special Ed Econ Disadv STAAR Percent at Phase-in 1 Level II or Above Grade 4 Reading 2013 72% 79% 87% * 70% 88% - * - 100% * 60% * 2012 77% 86% 93% * 82% 94% - * - * 75% 75% * Mathematics 2013 69% 71% 84% * 90% 82% - * - * 60% 64% * 2012 69% 77% 96% * 100% 94% - * - * 88% 88% * Writing 2013 70% 78% 82% * 80% 82% - * - * * 64% * 2012 72% 82% 92% * 82% 93% - * - * 67% 75% * STAAR Percent at Phase-in 1 Level II or Above Grade 5 Reading 2013 77% 86% 91% * 64% 97% - * - * 75% 69% * 2012 78% 87% 93% * 75% 94% * * - * 80% 78% * Mathematics 2013 74% 83% 91% * 71% 93% - * - * 63% 77% * 2012 78% 87% 94% * 75% 96% * * - * 87% 67% * Science 2013 73% 80% 89% * 71% 95% - * - * 63% 75% * 2012 73% 82% 91% * 83% 91% * * - * 67% 89% * STAAR Percent at Phase-in 1 Level II or Above All Grades All Subjects 2013 77% 88% 89% 95% 85% 90% - 95% - 85% 62% 78% 47% 2012 77% 88% 92% 100% 85% 92% * 100% - 100% 78% 76% * Reading 2013 80% 90% 93% 100% 85% 93% - 94% - 100% 60% 79% * 2012 79% 88% 93% 100% 84% 94% * 100% - 100% 79% 78% * Mathematics 2013 79% 87% 89% 100% 91% 88% - 100% - 80% 76% 83% 83% 2012 77% 88% 92% 100% 87% 91% * 100% - 100% 84% 70% * TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 1
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Performance Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary African American Hispanic White American Indian State District Campus Asian ELL STAAR Percent at Phase-in 1 Level II or Above All Grades Writing 2013 63% 79% 82% * 80% 82% - * - * * 64% * 2012 67% 82% 92% * 82% 93% - * - * 67% 75% * Science 2013 82% 91% 89% * 71% 95% - * - * 63% 75% * 2012 80% 89% 91% * 83% 91% * * - * 67% 89% * Pacific Islander Two or More Races Special Ed Econ Disadv STAAR Percent at Final Level II or Above All Grades All Subjects 2013 35% 49% 58% 47% 47% 61% - 63% - 30% 24% 41% 12% 2012 33% 47% 60% 77% 58% 59% * 79% - 60% 37% 37% * Reading 2013 41% 55% 65% 57% 50% 70% - 50% - 40% 20% 47% * 2012 38% 52% 68% 60% 68% 68% * 82% - 64% 33% 48% * Mathematics 2013 34% 47% 53% 43% 44% 56% - 63% - 10% 28% 34% 17% 2012 33% 48% 54% 80% 52% 53% * 73% - 55% 34% 26% * Writing 2013 32% 50% 54% * 60% 53% - * - * * 45% * 2012 34% 52% 51% * 55% 48% - * - * 56% 50% * Science 2013 33% 47% 59% * 36% 62% - * - * 25% 42% * 2012 29% 41% 64% * 50% 65% * * - * 40% 22% * STAAR Percent at Level III Advanced All Grades All Subjects 2013 13% 20% 26% 21% 20% 29% - 23% - 7% 3% 13% 0% 2012 12% 20% 28% 54% 21% 28% * 31% - 36% 10% 11% * Reading 2013 17% 26% 36% 29% 32% 39% - 19% - 20% 4% 21% * 2012 15% 24% 35% 40% 32% 35% * 36% - 36% 12% 19% * Mathematics 2013 15% 23% 27% 14% 21% 29% - 31% - 0% 4% 9% 0% 2012 14% 23% 25% 60% 19% 25% * 27% - 27% 6% 7% * Writing 2013 4% 7% 7% * 0% 9% - * - * * 0% * 2012 6% 12% 17% * 9% 16% - * - * 0% 0% * TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 2
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Performance Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary African American Hispanic White American Indian State District Campus Asian ELL STAAR Percent at Level III Advanced All Grades Science 2013 10% 18% 19% * 0% 22% - * - * 0% 17% * 2012 9% 14% 25% * 8% 25% * * - * 20% 11% * STAAR Percent Met or Exceeded Progress All Grades Reading 2013 62% 67% 64% 100% 69% 65% - * - * * n/a - Pacific Islander Two or More Races Special Ed Econ Disadv Mathematics 2013 59% 61% 68% * 69% 71% - 63% - * 50% n/a - STAAR Percent Exceeded Progress All Grades Reading 2013 15% 19% 18% 40% 13% 19% - * - * * n/a - Mathematics 2013 16% 18% 29% * 50% 27% - 38% - * 30% n/a - Progress of Prior Year STAAR Failers (Percent of Failers Passing STAAR) Sum of Grades 4-8 Reading 2013 43% 51% 36% - * 40% - - - - 50% * * Mathematics 2013 46% 50% 55% * 67% 47% - - - - 60% 67% * Student Success Initiative Grade 5 Reading Students Requiring Accelerated Instruction 2013 23% 14% 9% * 36% 3% - * - * 25% 31% * STAAR Cumulative Met Standard 2013 87% 93% 97% * 86% 99% - * - * 100% 92% * Grade 5 Mathematics Students Requiring Accelerated Instruction 2013 26% 17% 9% * 29% 7% - * - * 38% 23% * STAAR Cumulative Met Standard 2013 88% 92% 99% * 93% 100% - * - * 100% 100% * TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 3
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Performance Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary State District Campus African American Hispanic White American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Two or More Races Special Ed Econ Disadv ELL 2013 STAAR Participation (All Grades) All Tests Test Participant 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 99% - 100% - 100% 99% 99% 100% Included in Accountability 92% 94% 96% 90% 93% 96% - 93% - 100% 85% 94% 77% Not Included in Accountability Mobile 4% 3% 3% 10% 2% 2% - 7% - 0% 11% 0% 0% Other Exclusions 3% 3% 1% 0% 5% 0% - 0% - 0% 3% 5% 23% Not Tested 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% - 0% - 0% 1% 1% 0% Absent 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% - 0% - 0% 1% 1% 0% Other 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 4
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Performance Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary African American Hispanic White American Indian Pacific Islander Two or More Races State District Campus Asian ELL Attendance Rate 2011-12 95.9% 96.8% 97.6% 98.5% 97.4% 97.6% * 98.9% - 98.0% 97.1% 96.8% 98.8% 2010-11 95.7% 96.8% 97.6% 97.8% 97.9% 97.5% * 97.9% - 97.7% 97.5% 96.6% 98.2% Special Ed Econ Disadv TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 5
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Profile Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary ---------------- Campus ---------------- Student Information Count Percent District State Total Students: 524 100.0% 52,399 5,058,939 Students by Grade: Early Childhood Education 1 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% Pre-Kindergarten 0 0.0% 2.9% 4.5% Kindergarten 67 12.8% 6.9% 7.7% Grade 1 89 17.0% 7.1% 7.8% Grade 2 81 15.5% 7.3% 7.7% Grade 3 89 17.0% 7.3% 7.6% Grade 4 101 19.3% 7.5% 7.5% Grade 5 96 18.3% 7.6% 7.4% Grade 6 0 0.0% 7.8% 7.5% Grade 7 0 0.0% 8.0% 7.5% Grade 8 0 0.0% 7.9% 7.2% Grade 9 0 0.0% 7.9% 8.0% Grade 10 0 0.0% 7.6% 6.9% Grade 11 0 0.0% 7.1% 6.5% Grade 12 0 0.0% 7.0% 6.0% Ethnic Distribution: African American 17 3.2% 9.1% 12.7% Hispanic 69 13.2% 26.8% 51.3% White 384 73.3% 49.6% 30.0% American Indian 4 0.8% 0.4% 0.4% Asian 26 5.0% 11.1% 3.6% Pacific Islander 1 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% Two or More Races 23 4.4% 2.9% 1.8% Economically Disadvantaged 67 12.8% 30.0% 60.4% Non-Educationally Disadvantaged 457 87.2% 70.0% 39.6% English Language Learners (ELL) 12 2.3% 13.7% 17.1% Students w/ Disciplinary Placements (2011-2012) 0 0.0% 1.3% 1.7% At-Risk 26 5.0% 25.0% 44.7% Mobility (2011-2012) 26 5.3% 10.9% 17.9% TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 6
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Profile Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary --------- Non-Special Education Rates --------- ------------- Special Education Rates ------------- Student Information Campus District State Campus District State RetentionRates by Grade: Kindergarten 1.5% 1.8% 2.1% 18.2% 9.0% 9.7% Grade 1 1.4% 1.3% 4.4% 0.0% 3.3% 8.2% Grade 2 2.7% 1.3% 2.9% 0.0% 1.2% 3.9% Grade 3 0.0% 0.5% 2.1% 0.0% 0.2% 1.6% Grade 4 0.0% 0.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.8% 1.0% Grade 5 0.0% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4% 0.7% Grade 6-0.4% 0.6% - 0.4% 1.0% Grade 7-0.6% 1.0% - 0.5% 1.4% Grade 8-0.6% 0.7% - 0.8% 1.5% Class Size Information Campus District State Class Size Averages by Grade and Subject (Derived from teacher responsibility records): Elementary: Kindergarten 17.7 19.2 19.6 Grade 1 18.7 19.3 19.5 Grade 2 20.2 18.4 19.4 Grade 3 18.0 18.4 19.3 Grade 4 18.9 19.1 19.5 Grade 5 17.9 20.4 21.4 Grade 6-20.9 21.1 Mixed Grades - - 24.6 Secondary: English/Language Arts - 18.7 17.4 Foreign Languages - 20.3 19.0 Mathematics - 19.8 18.0 Science - 21.2 19.0 Social Studies - 22.5 19.7 TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 7
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Profile Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary ---------------------- Campus ---------------------- Staff Information Count/Average Percent District State Total Staff 52.2 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Professional Staff: 43.2 82.8% 72.7% 63.9% Teachers 37.1 71.1% 59.9% 51.0% Professional Support 4.1 7.8% 8.9% 9.0% Campus Administration (School Leadership) 2.0 3.8% 3.0% 2.9% Educational Aides: 9.0 17.2% 9.6% 9.3% Total Minority Staff: 2.1 4.0% 18.2% 45.1% Teachers by Ethnicity and Sex: African American 1.0 2.7% 4.1% 9.4% Hispanic 1.1 3.0% 8.1% 24.9% White 35.0 94.3% 85.5% 62.8% American Indian 0.0 0.0% 0.8% 0.4% Asian 0.0 0.0% 1.0% 1.4% Pacific Islander 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Two or More Races 0.0 0.0% 0.5% 1.1% Males 1.0 2.7% 18.4% 23.2% Females 36.1 97.3% 81.6% 76.8% Teachers by Years of Experience: Beginning Teachers 0.1 0.3% 4.6% 7.0% 1-5 Years Experience 4.0 10.8% 21.3% 26.1% 6-10 Years Experience 8.0 21.6% 23.2% 22.7% 11-20 Years Experience 17.0 45.8% 33.6% 26.9% Over 20 Years Experience 8.0 21.6% 17.3% 17.3% Number of Students per Teacher 14.1 n/a 14.0 15.5 TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 8
District Name: LEWISVILLE ISD Texas Academic Performance Report Total Students: 524 Campus Name: FLOWER MOUND EL 2012-13 Campus Profile Grade Span: EE - 05 School Type: Elementary Staff Information Campus District State Average Years Experience of Teachers: 13.8 12.2 11.5 Average Years Experience of Teachers with District: 10.2 8.3 8.0 Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience (regular duties only): Beginning Teachers $47,500 $46,566 $41,878 1-5 Years Experience $48,449 $47,168 $44,354 6-10 Years Experience $49,573 $48,868 $46,784 11-20 Years Experience $51,631 $52,133 $50,587 Over 20 Years Experience $55,516 $62,746 $58,291 Average Actual Teacher Salaries (regular duties only): Teachers $51,670 $51,903 $48,821 Professional Support $53,829 $59,235 $57,253 Campus Administration (School Leadership) $73,500 $75,373 $71,259 Instructional Staff Percent: n/a 72.8% 64.2% Contracted Instructional Staff (not incl. above): 0.0 0.0 1,556.8 ---------------- Campus ---------------- Program Information Count Percent District State Student Enrollment by Program: Bilingual/ESL Education 11 2.1% 14.1% 16.6% Career & Technical Education 0 0.0% 14.1% 22.0% Gifted & Talented Education 45 8.6% 9.9% 7.7% Special Education 47 9.0% 9.6% 8.5% Teachers by Program (population served): Bilingual/ESL Education 0.1 0.2% 6.0% 5.3% Career & Technical Education 0.0 0.0% 3.0% 4.1% Compensatory Education 0.0 0.0% 0.6% 2.9% Gifted & Talented Education 1.0 2.7% 1.5% 2.0% Regular Education 35.9 96.6% 76.2% 73.2% Special Education 0.2 0.5% 9.2% 9.2% Other 0.0 0.0% 3.5% 3.3% Link to: PEIMS Financial Standard Reports/ 2011-2012 Financial Actual Report '?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observationsreported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group. TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 9