Standardized Performance Measures

Similar documents
DROP-IN CENTERS CONCEPT PAPER S

DENVER HOUSING FIRST COLLABORATIVE COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES REPORT. Jennifer Perlman, PsyD, and John Parvensky

Rebuilding Lives Updated Strategy: Recommended Strategies RLUS Steering Committee

System Performance Measures An introductory guide to understanding system-level performance measurement

City of Los Angeles, Consolidated Plan

Supportive Housing Program (SHP) Self-Monitoring Tools

Promising Strategies: Mercer County Board of Social Services and Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness. Mercer County, New Jersey

Long-Term Homeless Definitions and Eligibility Questions


A Sustainable Source for Services through Health Home Legislation: What it Means for Supportive Housing

Senate Bill (SB) 855: Housing Support Program Orange County Application

Homelessness in Greater New Orleans: A Report on Progress toward Ending Homelessness May 2012

Housing is Health & Recovery

MONROE COUNTY OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RECOVERY CONNECTION PROJECT PROGRAM EVALUATION DECEMBER 2010

SOUTHERN NEVADA COC APPLICATION PROCESS

2015 HUD CoC Competition Evaluation Instrument

Move-Up: A Strategy for PHAs and COCs. November 15, 2013

Training and Consultation Services. Helping Organizations Achieve Excellence

Changes in the HUD Definition of Homeless

Monthly THP Plus & THP+FC Conference Call

A Quick Summary for Domestic Violence Advocates

2015 Results Los Angeles Continuum of Care. Published by: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority May 11, 2015

Using HMIS Data to Benchmark Plans to End Homelessness. K. Sujata, Chicago Continuum of Care

Quality Data Assures Quality Decisions. Acknowledgements: Symmetric Solutions, Inc. prepared this document under the direction of

Paul Gregerson, MD MBA CMO JWCH Institute, Inc. September 18th, 2013 Irvine, CA

5.5 Mobile Treatment Services (MTS)/Assertive Community Treatment (ACT)

Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Services State Plan

From Intake to Analysis: A Toolkit for Developing a. Continuum of Care Data Quality Plan

SWAP (System-Wide Analytics and Projection) Tool: 2016 Emergency Shelter Program Performance Analysis

HIV/AIDS Housing Inventory

2016 Homeless Count Results Los Angeles County and LA Continuum of Care. Published by: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority May 4,

Community Spotlight: Miami/Dade County

Supporting Transition-Aged Foster Youth

Integrating Treatment and Housing Services for Homeless Veterans: A Recovery Oriented System of Care Approach in Tucson Arizona

MAG Continuum of Care Regional Committee on Homelessness HUD McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Funding Program Performance Monitoring Methodology

Calgary Singles Acuity Scale Toolkit

Public Document Pack

OUT OF CARE AND HOMELESS IN MANITOBA. Kelly Holmes, Executive Director Resource Assistance for Youth, Inc.

The Five Year Plan to End Homelessness Among Veterans: Actions for FY Pete Dougherty Paul Smits

Complete Program Listing

SKID ROW HOUSING TRUST

ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT (ACT) FIDELITY REPORT

Lincoln, Nebraska utilized performance improvement principles developed by the Network for

Public Housing ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES FAMILY INVESTMENT ADMINISTRATION TEMPORARY CASH ASSISTANCE MANUAL COMAR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES 1300

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) SHELTER PROGRAM AWARD TRAINING

MAYOR S HOUSING THE HOMELESS TASK FORCE REPORT

MEDICAL CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department Inmate Services Bureau Education Based Incarceration Unit 1

Homeless in Houston: We re Making a Difference

Transitioning to The Health Home Model in PSH. Presented by Eric Morse, LISW-S, Chief Operating Officer

The Effect of Family Background on the Risk of Homelessness in a Cohort of Danish Adolescents

New Hampshire HMIS Governance Model

Federal Programs That Can Fund Employment for Homeless People 1

How To Write A Grant For A Health Information Technology Program

Supportive Housing Collaborations Miami Dade Examples

HMIS System Admin Training

Windsor Essex Housing and Homelessness Plan FINAL PLAN APRIL 2014

GAO. HOMELESS VETERANS PROGRAMS Bed Capacity, Service and Communication Gaps Challenge the Grant and Per Diem Program

Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board

Children s Advocacy Institute

AGENDA. III. Review January 11, 2013 Meeting Agenda and May 11, 2012 Meeting Minutes

PARTNERSHIPS FOR OPENING DOORS

Tarzana Treatment Centers, Inc. Community Health Needs Assessment. TTC Acute Psychiatric Hospital SPA 2. Implementation Strategy

Partnership: Project 25 Presentation to the National Association of Counties and Corporation for Supportive Housing June 7, 2012

Non-Traditional Student and Single Parent Accessibility Self-Assessment For Colleges and Universities

New York City Department of Homeless Services Audit Services Directive Number 1 Audit Protocols For Human Services Contracts

State Guidelines Point in Time and Housing Inventory Count of Homeless Persons. January 2016

FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY PUBLIC HEALTH TRAINEESHIP (FIU PHT) Collaborative Community-Based Project Ideas

Family Service Agency Continuous Quality Improvement Plan 2010 / 2012

Length of stay numbers are approximate and were calculated using a weighted average over multiple programs. 97

HOME FOR GOOD. The Action Plan to End Chronic and Veteran Homelessness by 2016

City of New York Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG DR) Proposed Amendments to Action Plan

A Coordinated Entry System for Los Angeles: Lessons from Early Implementation

Addiction Counseling Competencies. Rating Forms

Ohio Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services Linkage of STAR SI with the ODADAS Outcome Framework April to September 2008

INTEGRATING HOUSING IN STATE MEDICAID POLICY

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM

Coordinated Assessment-Centralized Intake System (CA-CI) for Homeless Services and Housing. System Assessment Part I DRAFT

DMHAS Information Systems Division

Mansfield District Council. Local Housing Allowance Direct Payment Strategy

Coveredtil26 Toolkit. Medi-Cal Coverage until Age 26 for Former Foster Youth

Arizona Workforce Development Forum

Denver Sheriff Department

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN Rev. March 13, 2014

How Community Health Workers Can Help Uninsured Americans

Five Year Plan to End Homelessness Among Veterans in King County

CURRENT STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING RECIDIVISM

Improving Service Delivery Through Administrative Data Integration and Analytics

Supportive Housing Evaluation Study Final Report

DHS/DMH Community Expansion under PA /SB Presentation to SMHR Act of 2013 Full Workgroup October 16, 2013

STEPHEN CENTER HERO Program ~ Health, Empowerment, Responsibility and Opportunity ~

RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSITION SCHEDULE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) APPLICATION GUIDEBOOK HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND RAPID RE-HOUSING PROGRAM (HPRP)

Integrated Care for the Chronically Homeless

A Homeless Prevention System for London Ontario

DHS Plans and Programs in the District of Columbia

North Carolina Division of Medical Assistance

CoC SuperNOFA Addressing HUD Priorities for a Competitive Proposal

Transcription:

Standardized Performance Measures Recommended Milestones and Outcome Targets for Homeless Programs HIGH PERFORMANCE SERIES The 100,000 Homes Campaign team identified a cohort of factors that are correlated with higher housing placement rates across campaign communities. The purpose of this High Performance Series of tools is to spotlight best practices and expand the movement s peer support network by sharing this knowledge with every community. This tool addresses Factors #11, 12 and 13: Standardized Performance Measures for Outreach, Emergency Shelter, Transitional Housing and Permanent Supportive Housing Programs. The full series is available at: http://100khomes.org/resources/high- performance- series

Standardized Performance Measures Recommended Target Outcomes and Milestones for Homeless Programs Ending homelessness is achievable. To get there, communities need a set of common performance measures to more strategically target their efforts in a system with limited resources. This tool helps communities and individual homeless providers: define and agree to a shared set of measures for success track progress toward a common set of milestone and outcomes identify areas in need of improvement What are Performance Measures, Milestones, and Outcome Targets? Performance measures are areas of performance that are viewed as important to a specific program. Outcomes are the concrete, measurable results that a program achieves, and milestones are interim steps that clients take on the way to achieving a concrete outcome. Tracking client and program- level progress towards milestone and outcome targets keeps everybody on track and promotes transparency around program performance. Setting targets on a timeline can establish a sense of shared accountability among staff at all levels for achieving quality and measurable program outcomes. Using this Standardized Performance Measures tool can help your community and/or program more effectively and efficiently house chronic and vulnerable individuals by shifting your culture towards using data to support internal program quality. Why Are Standardized Performance Measures Important for Homeless Programs? The ability to measure your program s performance is a powerful tool. It helps you understand whether your program s efforts are moving your clients toward the end goal: ending homelessness via housing placement and/or housing retention. Once performance targets are set, they can be used to measure performance, report progress along the way, and inform any improvements that need to be made. Using standardized outcome targets across the entire homeless system will help measure system- wide progress and impact allowing the sector to collaborate more effectively. What are the Campaign s Recommended Performance Measures? Measures for Outreach Programs Percentage of chronic and vulnerable street homeless clients encountered who agree to work with Outreach Team toward housing placement within six months of the first encounter Percent of total engagements that are with chronic/vulnerable individuals Service Linkage: Percent of engaged individuals with a specific condition that are linked to a relevant service Percent of engaged clients who receive condition- specific services 2

Percent of engaged clients who move into transitional housing, safe havens or emergency shelters Percent of engaged clients that move into permanent housing Percent of street homeless clients that move into emergency shelter, transitional housing, Safe Havens, or permanent housing within 30 days Percent of clients placed into emergency shelter, transitional housing, safe havens, and permanent housing that return to homelessness Measures for Emergency Shelters Percent of admitted clients who did not have needed benefits at program entry that exit program with needed benefits Percent of denied admissions due to active substance use Percent of denied admissions or expulsions due to a positive drug toxicology Percent of denied admissions due to mental illness Percent of denied admissions or expulsions due medication non- compliance (TB compliance is an exception) Percent of clients served who are chronically homeless Percent of admitted clients that exit to permanent housing Percent of clients moving into permanent housing that do so within 90 days Percent of clients moving into permanent housing that do so within 180 days Percent of clients placed into permanent housing that return to homelessness within one year Measures for Transitional Housing Programs 1 Percent of transitional housing clients who move on to permanent housing Percent of clients moving into permanent housing within 90 days Percent of clients placed into permanent housing that return to homelessness Increased Income: increased cash income from any source between intake & exit Increased Income: increased earned income between intake & exit Percent of admitted clients who are employed at exit from shelter Percent of admitted clients who did not have a needed benefit at program entry that exit program with needed benefit Measures for Permanent Supportive Housing Programs Percent of homeless in permanent housing for over 6 months Percent of homeless in permanent housing for over 1 year Percent of new tenants entering directly from emergency shelter without passing through transitional housing Percent of new tenants taken directly from the streets without going through emergency shelter or transitional housing Percent of new tenants that meet the HUD definition of chronic or the Campaign s definition of vulnerable at time of admission Percent of clients no longer in need of supportive housing (just housing subsidy) moved on to more independent housing each year Percent of tenants discharged for non- compliance with service participation 1 While the Campaign strongly believes that communities should be moving away from transitional housing (TH) as they implement Housing First, we also want this tool to have optimum utility for communities. Recognizing that HUD currently requires all communities report on TH outcomes, we have included this TH section in the tool. 3

Where Did These Measures Come From? The 100,000 Homes Campaign and CUCS came up with these measures based upon their experience working with programs throughout the county and by reviewing existing measures or performance standards from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and Home for Good (LA County). The Home for Good Standards of Excellence were developed by workgroups facilitated by the Corporation for Supportive Housing (CSH) and Shelter Partnership. The final tab in the attached Excel Spreadsheet References for Targets provides specific information on how each target was formulated. While we believe the performance measures are the areas of performance each type of program should be concerned with, the actual performance targets are meant merely as guides. These performance measures are not intended to replace or supersede any performance measures required by your program s funders. How do I use this tool? This tool includes an accompanying spreadsheet designed to help you establish performance targets on what we believe to be the core milestones and outcomes for homeless programs and to track your progress over time. The spreadsheet consists of the following Tabs: Tab 1 Outreach Targets Tab 2 Emergency Shelter Targets Tab 3 Transitional Housing Targets Tab 4 Permanent Supportive Housing Targets Tab 5 References for Performance Measures We have provided some recommended starting targets (column B), but depending upon your baseline and the specifics of your program, you may decide to start with lower targets (with a goal of getting to our targets over time) or even higher targets. Below are some step- by- step instructions on how to best use this tool. Step 1 Go to the tab for your program type (Outreach, Emergency Shelter, Transitional Housing or Permanent Supportive Housing) Step 2 Enter your program s current performance as a baseline for all outcome measures in Column C. Don t worry if you don t know your program s performance at this time, just leave the column blank. If your program s funders require that you track additional performance measures, feel free to insert them and track them here. If a funder s performance measure requires you to track the same basic data as our measures but is worded slightly differently, feel free to just incorporate your funder s language into the appropriate measure in this tool. 4

Step 3 Define a timeline on which you would like to track your targets. We recommend monthly but you may feel you can only do this on a quarterly basis. We do not recommend a longer timeline than quarterly. Step 4 Add your program s performance target for the upcoming period. You will start with Column D for Period 1 and prior to the next reporting period you will fill in new (often higher) targets for the next reporting period (Columns, G, J, L, O, R and then every third column from then on). If you have data from the previous period, you will likely want to set at least some of your targets for the next period slightly higher than the target for the previous period, so that your program is always striving to improve. But it is very difficult to work on improving too many things at once, so it is fine to select 1-2 targets for improvement each reporting period. Step 5 As each reporting period ends, enter your actual data in the Actual Program Performance column for the period you are in (Columns E, H, K, N, Q, T and then every third column from then on). Step 6 After inputting your actual data each reporting period, check the Variance between the target performance and your actual performance for the corresponding period (Columns F, I, L, O, R and U). Determine if there are areas in which your actual performance has exceeded your target for the reporting period and the areas where your actual performance was below your target. Choose one or two targets that you would like to improve for the next period and go back to Step 4. Who Does This Well? Hundreds of programs around the country are setting performance targets and tracking their progress toward meeting them. Of particular note are Los Angeles County and Home for Good, which are establishing standards of excellence for all outreach, emergency shelter and permanent supportive housing programs. Related Tools and Resources ü Common Eligibility Criteria for Emergency Shelter Programs ü Common Eligibility Criteria for Permanent Supportive Housing Programs ü Coordinated Outreach Tracker For more information and support, please contact Erin Healy, Improvement Advisor - 100,000 Homes Campaign, at ehealy@cmtysolutions.org 5