Wisconsin Health Trends: 2011 Progress Report

Similar documents
2015 County Health Rankings. Arizona

Health of Wisconsin. Children and young adults (ages 1-24) B D. Report Card July 2010

Introduction. All of the County Health Rankings are based upon this model of population health improvement:

County Health Rankings and Roadmaps Suburban Cook County Equivalent Measures

2013 Rankings Maryland

2016 County Health Rankings. Massachusetts

Opportunities to Make Wisconsin the Healthiest State

Department of Health Budget Hearing. November 24, 2014

2014 Rankings. New Jersey

2012 Rankings New Jersey

County Health Rankings - What Do They Mean to You?

EQUITABLE, ADEQUATE, STABLE PUBLIC HEALTH FUNDING

2012 Rankings Maryland

INSIDE FRONT COVER INTENTIONALLY BLANK

Georgia Statewide County Health Rankings

Partner Up! Campaign Overview & Connecting the Dots Preview

2013 Rankings South Carolina

2015 County Health Rankings. West Virginia

County Health Rankings - What Are the Key Findings in 2015?

2015 County Health Rankings. New York

PHRUC 2015: County Health Rankings Assignment Due Friday, February 13, 2015 by 4:00 pm, via the Dropbox

2015 County Health Rankings. South Dakota

County HealtH Rankings

Utilizing Public Data to Successfully Target Population for Prevention

2015 County Health Rankings. Florida

Using the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps to Drive County Change

2014 Rankings. South Carolina

2014 Rankings. Louisiana

2014 Rankings. Pennsylvania

Durham County Community Health. Assessment? What Is a Community Health

2015 County Health Rankings. Minnesota

PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

2016 County Health Rankings. Wisconsin

2014 Rankings. California

Policy Forum. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Illinois: Are There Any Solutions?

2016 County Health Rankings. Florida

2013 Rankings Wisconsin

2013 Rankings California

Progress in Reducing Premature Deaths in Wisconsin Counties,

Kansas Home Visiting Program Identification of High Risk Communities: Methodology and Findings

Massachusetts Evidence-Based Home Visiting Program: Needs Assessment Narrative

Selected Health Status Indicators DALLAS COUNTY. Jointly produced to assist those seeking to improve health care in rural Alabama

9. Substance Abuse. pg : Self-reported alcohol consumption. pg : Childhood experience of living with someone who used drugs

2016 County Health Rankings. Louisiana

Populations of Color in Minnesota

2014 Rankings. Wisconsin

Data Analysis and Interpretation. Eleanor Howell, MS Manager, Data Dissemination Unit State Center for Health Statistics

ANCHORAGE BOROUGH, ALASKA

2012 Rankings California

Green Lake County Public Health Department

The rate of hospitalizations due to assaultive injuries by spouse or partner (E976.3) per 100,000 females (13 and over)

Introduction. All of the County Health Rankings are based upon this model of population health improvement:

The Health and Well-being of the Aboriginal Population in British Columbia

A conversation with CDC s Alcohol Program, September 5, 2014

The Epidemiology and Culture of Alcohol Use and Impaired Driving in Wisconsin

in children less than one year old. It is commonly divided into two categories, neonatal

Racial Disparities in US Healthcare

The$Burden$of$Excessive$Alcohol$ Use$in$Wisconsin$

Racial-Ethnic Inequality in Child Well-Being from : Gaps Narrowing, but Persist

State Health Assessment Health Priority Status Report Update. June 29, 2015 Presented by UIC SPH and IDPH

This issue of Public Health Data Watch covers. Public Health Data Watch. Health of Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders in King County

Huron County Community Health Profile

Income is the most common measure

MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON

Successful Children and Youth

Statistical Bulletin. Adult Drinking Habits in Great Britain, Key points in 2013: Summary

Risk of alcohol. Peter Anderson MD, MPH, PhD, FRCP Professor, Alcohol and Health, Maastricht University Netherlands. Zurich, 4 May 2011

Introduction. Methods

Cuyahoga County Community Health Data Dashboard

4.2 Low Birth Weight

SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

2015 HonorHealth Rehabilitation Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment. Approved by the Board Strategic Planning Committee October 2015

2016 County Health Rankings Key Findings Report

BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Alabama s Rural and Urban Counties

Adolescent Mortality. Alaska s adolescent mortality rate is 29% higher than the national rate and almost 1.6 times the Healthy People 2010 target.

2013 Rankings Michigan

Health of King County Focus: health inequities

activity guidelines (59.3 versus 25.9 percent, respectively) and four times as likely to meet muscle-strengthening

Claudia Benton, MSN, RN-BC, PHN Erin Slack, MPH February 12, 2014

Memorial Hermann Rehabilitation Hospital Katy Community Health Needs Assessment

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Data, Then Action. 3

King County City Health Profile Vashon Island

COUNTY HEALTH RANKINGS Joseph P. Iser, MD, DrPH, MSc Chief Health Officer, Southern Nevada Health District Introductions and Welcome

UF Health Jacksonville CHNA Implementation Strategy

Women s and Men s Health: A Comparison of Select Indicators

TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

New Jersey Kids Count 2015 Bergen County Profile

How To Calculate The National Income Gap

INSIDE FRONT COVER INTENTIONALLY BLANK

Butler Memorial Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment 2013

BUSINESS CASE STUDY: The Dow Chemical Company Company Overview

County Health Rankings Provide Opportunity to Emphasize Ohio s Prevention Efforts

The High Cost of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in New Hampshire. Executive Summary. PolEcon Research December 2012

Vermont PRAMS Data Brief

2012 Rankings North Carolina

Economic recession and alcoholrelated

Exploratory Data Analysis with R

2016 County Health Rankings. Michigan

Transcription:

Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report July 21 School of Medicine and Public Health UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute Department of Population Health Sciences With support from Wisconsin Partnership Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Overview of the Wisconsin Health Trends: Progress Report 2 Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report 3 How to Interpret the Report 4 211 Health Progress Assessment 5 Health Outcome Trends 6 Health Behavior Trends 9 Clinical Care Trends 1 Social and Economic Trends 11 Physical Environment Trends 12 Data Sources and Technical Notes 13 Funding for this report is provided by the Wisconsin Partnership Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health (UW SMPH). Graphic design was provided by Media Solutions, UW SMPH. We gratefully acknowledge input and feedback from the Population Health Institute s Advisory Board and the contributions of Erika Cheng, MPA and Greg Nycz in producing this report. Suggested Citation: Remington PL, Roubal AM, Catlin BB, Timberlake K. Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State, Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, 212.

Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report Executive Summary Wisconsin Health Trends: Progress Report Background The Wisconsin State Health Plan for 22 established a goal for everyone to live longer and better. Progress toward this goal can be measured by monitoring trends in health outcomes and health factors overall, and for specific populations in the state. This report monitors trends in health over time while two other reports measure health in other ways: Opportunities to Make Wisconsin the Healthiest State compares Wisconsin s health factors to those of the U.S. and the Health of Wisconsin Report Card examines disparities in health outcomes across specific populations. What we did for this report Ten-year trends for 2 leading health indicators were measured and compared to a standard developed for Healthy People 22 goals of an improvement of at least 1%/year. To assess recent trends, the most current rates for these indicators were compared to the rate that was expected if the baseline trends had continued. What we found Death rates are declining significantly (>1%/year) for children and young adults (ages 1-24) and for older adults (ages 45-74). However, despite significant declines in the most recent year, the 1-year trends in death rates for infants (<1 year) and for adults ages 25-44 are not progressing toward the 22 goal. In contrast to mostly encouraging trends in death rates, trends in the rates of self-reported health and low birthweight have been getting worse over the past 1 years. Over the past decade, rates of smoking and teen births have improved significantly, whereas rates of alcohol misuse have not changed and obesity rates have increased by over 3% each year. Social, economic, and environmental factors have also worsened over the past decade in Wisconsin, with significant increases in rates of high school dropouts, unemployment, children living in poverty, lack of health insurance, violent crimes, and air pollution. Summary With the reductions in death rates in all age groups, Wisconsin is making progress toward the goal of living longer. However, these data suggest that quality of life may be declining and that increasing rates of obesity and worsening social and economic factors will lead to poor health outcomes and more disparities in the future. -1-

Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project Overview of the Wisconsin Health Trends: Progress Report The Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report provides a way to assess whether Wisconsin is achieving its goal for everyone to live longer and better (Wisconsin State Health Plan: Healthiest Wisconsin 22). Funded through a grant from the Wisconsin Partnership Program, this report assesses progress for 2 indicators of the health of Wisconsin by assessing trends over the past 1 years, and by determining whether current rates are better or worse than expected. This report will be published yearly and is intended to be a tracking tool for Wisconsin changes will reflect health reductions or improvements during the most current year for which data are available. How we measure health The 2 health indicators are based on a model of population health that emphasizes that many factors, if improved, can help make communities healthier places to live, learn, work and play. Measures come mostly from the County Health Rankings, another research project of the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The measures chosen are dynamic (meaning that the values have the potential to change year to year) and are areas where targeted improvement will help improve the health of Wisconsin. How progress is assessed We calculate the annual percent change (APC) for each of the 2 health indicators for the past 1 years. An increasing annual percent change indicates a worsening health trend, while a decreasing annual percent change indicates an improving health trend. The expected APC is zero percent per year. Using these baseline trends, we determine what the expected current rate would be for each indicator, if the past 1 year trend continued. We compared this expected rate to the current observed rate, to see if it is better or worse than expected. Progress is determined by calculating the percent difference between the observed and expected rates. A green circle ( ) or ( ) indicates that Wisconsin did better than expected for the health indicator; A yellow circle ( ) indicates that Wisconsin did about the same as expected; and A red circle ( ) or ( ) indicates that Wisconsin did worse than for the health indicator. The Wisconsin Health Trends: Progress Report is useful for public health professionals, policy makers, and concerned citizens for assessing long-term and recent trends in leading health indicators. The Progress Report does not provide comparable data to other states, nor does it address health disparities in Wisconsin. To understand more about how Wisconsin s health and several leading health indicators compare to the health of other states, two other tools are available: America s Health Rankings (www.americashealthrankings.org) and Opportunities to Make Wisconsin the Healthiest State (http://uwphi.pophealth.wisc.edu/programs/match/ healthiest-state/opportunities-to-make-wi-the-healthiest-state.pdf). In order to understand what kind of health disparities exist in Wisconsin and to see the grades for these disparities, the Health of Wisconsin Report Card is available (http://uwphi.pophealth.wisc.edu/programs/match/healthiest-state/report-card/21/reportcard.pdf). Readers of the Progress Report may wish to use its findings to begin or expand efforts to improve Wisconsin s performance on one or more of these leading health indicators. To identify evidence-based strategies that promote health improvement, visit http://whatworksforhealth.wisc.edu/. To find resources to develop an action plan that works for your community, please visit www.countyhealthrankings.org/roadmaps. -2-

Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report Health Outcomes Current Rate (versus expected) Progress Worse No Difference Better Baseline Trend Better No Change 45-64 year old death rate 65-74 year old death rate All ages death rate Premature death (< 75 years) rate 1-14 year old death rate 15-24 year old death rate 25-44 year old death rate Infant death rate Worse Self-reported health Low birthweight Health Factors Current Rate (versus expected) Progress Worse No Difference Better Baseline Trend Better No Change Worse Smoking Unemployment Children in poverty No health insurance Teen births Excessive drinking Obesity Violent crime rate High school drop-outs Air pollution Baseline Trend Progress Dark Red = APC* > +1.%/year Light Red = +1.%/year > APC > +.5%/year Yellow = +.5%/year > APC > -.5%/year Light Green = -.5%/year > APC > -1.%/year Dark Green = -1.%/year > APC *APC = Annual Percent Change Current Progress Dark Red = Current Rate is much worse than expected rate (>+2.% and p<.1) Light Red = Current rate is worse than expected rate (>+2.%) Yellow = Current rate is no different than expected rate (±2.%) Light Green = Current rate is better than expected rate (<-2.%) Dark Green = Current rate is much better than expected rate (<-2.% and p<.1) -3-

Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project How to Interpret the Report The Wisconsin Health Trends: Progress Report is useful for examining how the rates of specific health indicators have changed over the past year, compared to long term trends. Here is a guide to understanding the numbers and graphs provided in this report. Infant Death Rate per 1, Live Births 1 1) Baseline Trend (-.3) 8 2) Expected (6.5) 6 4) Difference (-.5) 4 3) Current (6.) 2 1 The known data points for the 1 years prior to the current year are graphed and a best fit linear regression line is added to the graph. A decreasing line indicates improvement: this example shows a reduction in infant deaths. 2 The line is extended in order to show what the expected value would be if Wisconsin continued with the same trend as seen in the previous 1 years. 3 The current observed value is shown along with its 9% statistical confidence interval. Comparing this point to the expected trend line provides a comparison of how well Wisconsin is doing currently compared to what was expected. 4 The difference is calculated as: Percent Difference = observed value-expected value 1 expected value For the infant death rate example above, the baseline trend shows that infant mortality rates decreased only.3% per year, i.e., a trend considered to be no change. However, the current rate (29, the most recent year of data available), is 8% less than expected (6. vs. 6.5). This indicates that in the most current year for which data are available, Wisconsin performed much better than expected. This would indicate that Wisconsin may continue to improve in the future. -4-

Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report 211 Health Progress Assessment Measure Baseline Trend (% change/year) 1-year Trend Progress Current Observed Rate (9% CI) Expected Difference Percent Difference Current Progress Health Outcomes Premature death rate (YPLL-75 per 1,) -1. 5612 (5596-5629) 581-189 -3.3 Low birthweight (%) +.8 7.1 (7.-7.3) 7.1.. Self-reported poor or fair health (%) +.6 13.6 (13.6-13.6) 12.4 +1.2 +9.7 All ages death rate (per 1,) -1.7 74 (698-71) 697 +7. +1. Infant death rate (per 1,) -.3 6. (5.5-6.5) 6.5 -.5-8. 1-14 year old death rate (per 1,) -3.1 14.4 (13-16) 16.1-1.7-1.6 15-24 year old death rate (per 1,) -1.2 58.3 (54-63) 67.5-9.2-13.7 25-44 year old death rate (per 1,) -.1 118 (113-122) 121-3.6-3. 45-64 year old death rate (per 1,) -1.1 57 (498-517) 493 +14.3 +2.9 65-74 year old death rate (per 1,) -2.9 1721 (1687-1755) 1726-5.3 -.3 Health Behaviors Smoking (%) -2.7 19.1 (17-21) 18.2.9 +4.9 Obesity (%) +3.7 26.9 (25-29) 28.8-1.9-6.6 Excessive drinking (%) -.5 27.7 (27-28) 3.5-2.8-9.2 Teen births (per 1,) -1.6 29.6 (29-3) 29.8 -.2 -.7 Health Factors Clinical Care Social and Economic Factors No health insurance (%) +4.8 8.9 (9.-9.) 8.3 +.6 +7.2 High school drop-outs (%) +2.1 2.3 (2.3-2.3) 2.4 -.1-4.2 Unemployment (%) +3.6 8.3 (8.3-8.3) 6.5 +1.8 +27.7 Children in poverty (%) +4.4 19. (18.4-19.6) 16.4 +2.6 +15.9 Violent crime rate (per 1,) +2.8 25 (247-253) 286-36. -12.6 Physical Environment Air Pollution (µg/m³) +.7 1.5 (1.5-1.5) 11.3 -.8-7.1 Baseline Trend = (e b -1)*1 where e=exponential function and b=slope of the logarithmic trend-line Trend Progress = Based on magnitude of the baseline trend (see page 3 for cut-off values) Current Observed Rate = Rate or percentage provided for the most current year from the data sources Expected = Value expected for the current year using a 1-year linear regression model for the 1-previous years Difference = Observed Value Expected Value Percent Difference = (Observed Value Expected Value) / Expected Value Current Progress = Based on magnitude and significance of the percent difference value (see page 3 for cut-off values) -5-

Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project Health Outcome Trends 1, Premature Death Age-adjusted Years per Life Lost (<75) Rate per 1, 8, -1.% 6, 4, 2, Premature Death Baseline Trend = -1.%/year Much Better Current Rate (vs. expected) = -3.3% Much Better Births Less Than 25 Grams (%) Low Birthweight 1 +.8% 8 6 4 2 Low Birthweight Baseline Trend = +.8%/year Worse Current Rate (vs. expected) = % No Different Self-Reported Health Adults with Fair or Poor Health (%) 16 14 +.6% 12 1 8 6 4 2 Self-Reported Health Baseline Trend = +.6%/year Worse Current Rate (vs. expected) = +9.7% Much Worse -6-

Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report Age-Adjusted Death Rate per 1, All Ages Death 1 9-1.7% 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 All Ages Death Baseline Trend = -1.7%/year Much Better Current Rate (vs. expected) =+ 1.% No Different Infant Death Rate per 1, Live Births Infant Death 1 8 -.3% 6 4 2 Infant Death Baseline Trend = -.3%/year No Change Current Rate (vs. expected) = -8.% Much Better 3 1-14 Year Old Death Death Rate per 1, ages 1-14 25-3.1% 2 15 1 5 1-14 Year Old Death Baseline Trend = -3.1%/year Much Better Current Rate (vs. expected) = -1.6% Better -7-

Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project Death Rate per 1, ages 15-24 15-24 Year Old Death 1 9-1.2% 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 15-24 Year Old Death Baseline Trend = -1.2%/year Much Better Current Rate (vs. expected) = -13.7% Much Better Death Rate per 1, ages 25-44 25-44 Year Old Death 2 18 16 -.1% 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 25-44 Year Old Death Baseline Trend = -.1%/year No Charge Current Rate (vs. expected) = -3.% Better Death Rate per 1, ages 45-64 45-64 Year Old Death 7-1.1% 6 5 4 3 2 1 45-64 Year Old Death Baseline Trend = -1.1%/year Much Better Current Rate (vs. expected) = +2.9% Much Worse -8-

Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report Death Rate per 1, ages 65-74 65-74 Year Old Death 3, 2,5-2.9% 2, 1,5 1, 5 65-74 Year Old Death Baseline Trend = -2.9%/year Much Better Current Rate (vs. expected) = -.3% No Different Health Behavior Trends 4 Smoking 35 Adult Smoking (%) 3 25 2 15 1-2.7% Smoking Baseline Trend = -2.7%/year Much Better Current Rate (vs. expected) = +4.9% Worse 5 4 Obesity Adult Obesity (%) 35 3 25 2 15 +3.7% Obesity Baseline Trend = +3.7%/year Much Worse 1 Current Rate (vs. expected) = -6.6% Better 5-9-

Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project Excessive Drinking Excessive Drinking Adults (%) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 -.5% Excessive Drinking Baseline Trend = -.5%/year No Change Current Rate (vs. expected) =- 9.2% Much Better Teen Birth Rate per 1, Females (Aged 15-19) Teen Births 4-1.6% 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Teen Births Baseline Trend = -1.6%/year Much Better Current Rate (vs. expected) = -.7% No Change Clinical Care Trends 12 No Health Insurance Population (under 65) without Health Insurance (%) 1 8 6 4 2 +4.8% No Health Insurance Baseline Trend = +4.8%/year Much Worse Current Rate (vs. expected) = +7.2% Much Worse -1-

Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report Social and Economic Trends 3. High School Drop-out High School Drop-out (%) 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5 +2.1% High School Drop-out Baseline Trend = +2.1%/year Much Worse Current Rate (vs. expected) = -4.2% Much Better. Unemployment Rate (%) Unemployment 1 9 8 +3.6% 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unemployment Baseline Trend = +3.6%/year Much Worse Current Rate (vs. expected) = +27.7% Much Worse 25 Poverty Children in Poverty (%) 2 15 1 5 +4.4% Children in Poverty Baseline Trend = +4.4%/year Much Worse Current Rate (vs. expected) = +15.9% Much Worse -11-

Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project 4 Violent Crime Violent Crime Rate per 1, 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 +2.8% Violent Crime Rate Baseline Trend = +2.8%/year Much Worse Current Rate (vs. expected) = -12.6% Much Better Physical Environment Trends Micrograms of Fine Particles per Cubic Meter 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Air Pollution +.7% Air Pollution Baseline Trend = +.7%/year Worse Current Rate (vs. expected) = -7.1% Much Better -12-

Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report Measure Premature (<75) death rate (per 1,) Low birthweight (%) Self-reported poor or fair health (%) All ages death rate (per 1,) Infant death rate (per 1, live births) 1-14 year old death rate (per 1,) 15-24 year old death rate (per 1,) 25-44 year old death rate (per 1,) 45-64 year old death rate (per 1,) 65-75 year old death rate (per 1,) Smoking (%) Obesity (%) Excessive drinking (%) Teen births (per 1,) Source Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Current Year Baseline Trend Years 29 1999-28 29 1999-28 21 21-29 29 1999-28 Measure Definition Years per life lost before 75 (YPLL-75): the sum of the difference between age 75 and the age of death for deaths that occurred prior to 75, (age-adjusted to 2 population) per 1, population The percent of live births for which the infant weighed less than 2,5 grams (approximately 5 lbs., 8 oz.) Responses of fair or poor to the survey question: In general, would you say that your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor? Total number of deaths age-adjusted to the 2 standard U.S.population 29 1999-28 Number of deaths before age 1 per 1, live births 29 1999-28 29 1999-28 29 1999-28 29 1999-28 29 1999-28 Number of deaths between ages 1 and 14 per 1, population Number of deaths between ages 15 and 24 per 1, population Number of deaths between ages 25 and 44 per 1, population Number of deaths between ages 45 and 64 per 1, population Number of deaths between ages 65 and 74 per 1, population 21 2-29 Percentage of adults who are current smokers 21 2-29 21 2-29 Percent of adults with a Body Mass Index greater than or equal to 3kg/m 2 The percent of the adult population that consumed more than 4 (women) or 5 (men) alcoholic beverages on a single occasion in the past 3 days (binge drinking) or drank more than 1 (women) or 2 (men) drinks per day on average (heavy drinking) 29 1999-28 Number of live births per 1, females aged 15-19 Non-insured (%) Family Health Survey 29 21-28 Percent of the population under 65 without health insurance High school dropouts (%) Unemployment (%) Children in Poverty (%) Violent crime rate (per 1,) Air Pollution (µg/m³) National Center for Education Statistics Bureau of Labor Statistics Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance America s Health Rankings/Environmental Protection Agency *Does not include 23-24 school year Data Sources and Technical Notes 29 21-28* 21 21-29 21 2-29 21 2-29 211 23-21 Count of drop-outs in grades 9-12 divided by the base enrollment for grades 9-12 Persons are classified as unemployed if they do not have a job, have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work The percent of children under age 18 living below the Federal Poverty Line The number of offenses that involve face-to-face confrontation between the victim and the perpetrator per 1, population The average exposure of the general public to particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in size (PM2.5) measured in µg/m³ -13-

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN Population Health Institute Translating Research for Policy and Practice POPULATION Health Sciences University of Wisconsin M A D I S O N Contact Information University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute Department of Population Health Sciences University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health 575 WARF Building 61 Walnut Street Madison, WI 53726-2397 Phone: (68) 263-6294 Fax: (68) 262-644 http://uwphi.pophealth.wisc.edu