The$Burden$of$Excessive$Alcohol$ Use$in$Wisconsin$
|
|
|
- Branden Newton
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ! THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The$Burden$of$Excessive$Alcohol$ Use$in$Wisconsin$ March!2013,!Revision!1!!! Penny!Black,!University!of!Wisconsin!Population!Health!Institute! Jason!Paltzer,!University!of!Wisconsin!Population!Health!Institute!!!! Executive!Summary! Excessive(alcohol(consumption(in(Wisconsin(is(a(public(health(problem(that(affects(every(man,( woman,(and(child(living(in(the(state.(this(study(estimates(the(economic(costs(of(excessive( alcohol(consumption(in(wisconsin(using(a(national(study(of(the(estimated(economic(cost(of( excessive(alcohol(consumption(in(the(united(states(and(wisconsin s(proportion(of(binge( drinkers.(data(from(the(national(study,(conducted(in(2006(and(published(in(2011,(was(adjusted( to(2012(dollars.(the(estimated(cost(of(excessive(alcohol(consumption(in(wisconsin(was($6.8( billion(in(2012.(this(cost(is(borne(by(everyone(in(the(state,(not(just(the(drinkers(themselves.( Revenue(generated(by(current(alcohol(taxes(covers(less(than(1%(of(the(total(economic(cost.(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! Revisions$ 1. The&definition&of&heavy&drinking&has&been&corrected:&>1&drink&per&day&on&average&for&a& woman,&and&>2&drinks&per&day&on&average&for&a&man.& 2. The&map&on&the&Ozaukee&County&profile&has&been&corrected.& 3. Reference&24&has&been&corrected:&United&States&Bureau&of&Labor&Statistics.& 4. The&alcohol&tax&revenue&cited&on&page&5&has&been&corrected&to&account&for&credits&given&by& the&wisconsin&department&of&revenue.& 5. Reference&28&has&been&modified&to&more&clearly&explain&which&rates&were&used&and&why.& 6. Appendix&1&has&been&revised&to&include&the&prevalence&of&binge&drinking&in&each&county. $ $ $
3 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! Introduction$ Excessive&alcohol&consumption&is&one&of&Wisconsin s&biggest&public&health&issues.&excessive& alcohol&consumption&is&associated&with&many&negative&health&and&social&consequences, 1S15 & which&come&at&a&great&economic&cost.&these&consequences&and&associated&economic&costs&are& borne&by&individual&users,&family&members,&neighbors,&and&entire&communities.&everyone&who& lives&and&works&in&wisconsin&is&affected&by&the&health&and&economic&costs&of&excessive&alcohol& consumption.& & In&2011,&the&most&recent&year&data&is&available,&excessive&drinking&in&Wisconsin&resulted&in& approximately&1529$deaths, 16 &48,578$hospitalizations, 17 &46,583$treatment$admissions, 18 & 60,221$arrests, 19 &and&5,751$motor$vehicle$crashes&(2010). 20 &Wisconsin&ranks&number&1&in&the& U.S.&in&rates&of&binge&drinking&and&number&1&in&intensity&of&drinking& &Wisconsin&adults&report& drinking&an&average&of&9&drinks&per&occasion. &21 && & The&purpose&of&this&report&is&to&present&estimates&of&the&economic&cost&of&excessive&alcohol& consumption&in&wisconsin&and&its&impact&on&the&state.&it&is&our&hope&that&these&estimates&will& be&used&to&more&fully&assess&the&public&health&impact&of&excessive&drinking&and&inform& discussions&of&public&policy.!& $ Methods$$ Excessive(Alcohol(Consumption( For&the&purpose&of&this&report,&excessive&alcohol&consumption&was&defıned&as&binge&drinking&( 4& drinks&per&occasion&for&a&woman,&and& 5&drinks&per&occasion&for&a&man);&heavy&drinking&(>1& drink&per&day&on&average&for&a&woman,&and&>2&drinks&per&day&on&average&for&a&man);&any&alcohol& consumption&by&youth&aged&<21&years;&and&any&alcohol&consumption&by&pregnant&women.&this& defınition&is&consistent&with¢ers&for&disease&control&and&prevention 21 &and&national&institute& on&alcoholism&and&alcohol&abuse 22 &standards&used&to&identify&harmful&patterns&of&alcohol& consumption.&& & Economic(Costs( National&U.S.&estimates&of&the&economic&costs&of&excessive&alcohol&consumption&obtained&by& Bouchery,&Hendrick,&Sacks,&Simon,&and&Brewer&(2011) 23 &were&used&to&extrapolate&economic& costs&in&wisconsin.&binge&drinking&is&responsible&for&the&majority&(76%)&of&alcoholsrelated& costs 23 &and&was&therefore&used&to&determine&the&percentage&of&the&national&estimates& attributable&to&wisconsin.&the&consumer&price&index 24& (CPI)&was&used&to&adjust&the&2006& estimates&from&bouchery&et&al.&to&2012&dollars.&other&states&have&used&a&similar&methodology& for&estimating&alcoholsrelated&costs&including&new&mexico 25,&Oregon 26,&and&Minnesota. 27 & & State5level(estimates:( 1. National&and&Wisconsin&binge&drinking&rates&from&the&Behavioral&Risk&Factor&Surveillance& System 28a,b &were&multiplied&by&national&and&state&adult&(18&and&older)&population&sizes 29 & to&obtain&the&estimated&number&of&binge&drinkers&in&the&u.s.&and&wisconsin.&the& number&of&wisconsin&binge&drinkers&was÷d&by&the&total&number&of&binge&drinkers& $ $ $ 1
4 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! & in&the&u.s.&to&determine&the&percentage&of&u.s.&binge&drinkers&coming&from&wisconsin.&& (See&calculations&below)& 2. National&economic&cost&estimates&were&adjusted&for&inflation&using&the&CPI&for&2012.&& 3. Wisconsin s&binge&drinker&percentage&was&multiplied&by&the&adjusted&national&total&and& categorical&economic&cost&estimates&to&determine&the&amount&attributed&to&wisconsin& as&a&state.& Step$1$ 2010(WI(Population((18+)( x( & & Binge(Drinking(%(( =( & &#(of(binge(drinkers(in(wi( 4,367,605& & 23%& & 999,358& & & & & & 2010(US(Population((18+)( x( Binge(Drinking(%(( =( #(of(binge(drinkers(in(us(( 235,572,845& & 16%& & 37,691,655& #(of(binge(drinkers(in(wi(( ( #(of(binge(drinkers(in(us(( =( Proportion(of(Binge( Drinkers((18+)(in(WI(( 999,358& & 37,691,655& & 2.65%$ & & & & $ Step$2$ & & & & US(National(Estimate( US(National(Estimate( (millions(2006(dollars)( x( National(CPI((2006(to(2012)( =& (millions(2012(dollars)( $223,478.60& & 1.15& & $257,000.39& & & & & & Step$3$ & & & & US(National(Estimate( Proportion(of(Binge( Costs(Attributed(to(WI( (millions(2012(dollars)( x( Drinkers(in(WI( =( (millions(2012(dollars)( $257,000.39& & 2.65%& & $6,810.51$ & County5level(estimates:( 1. CountySlevel&binge&drinking&prevalence&rates& from&behavioral&risk&factor&surveillance& System 28 &were&multiplied&by&county&adult&(18& and&older)&population&sizes 29 &to&obtain&the& number&of&binge&drinkers&in&each&wisconsin& county.& 2. The&number&of&binge&drinkers&in&each&county& was÷d&by&the&total&number&of&binge& drinkers&in&wisconsin&to&determine&the& percentage&of&binge&drinkers&for&each&county.& 3. The&percentage&of&binge&drinkers&in&each& county&was&used&to&determine&what& proportion&of&wisconsin s&total&and& categorical&alcoholsrelated&costs&are& attributed&to&each&county&(appendix&1).&&& & $ $ $ 2
5 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! & Bouchery&et&al.÷d&costs&into&the&following&subScategories:& Healthcare&&&! Specialty&care&for&abuse/dependence&! Hospitalizations&for&the&54&AlcoholSRelated&Disease&Impact&(ARDI)&conditions 30 & (primary&diagnosis&only)&! Fetal&alcohol&syndrome&! Health&insurance&administration&! Prevention&and&research&! Ambulatory&care&for&the&54&ARDI&conditions&(primary&diagnosis&only)&! Nursing&home&costs&! Training&of&substance&abuse&and&mental&health&professionals& Productivity&(estimated&earnings&levels)&! Lost&productivity&while&at&work,&home,&or&while&institutionalized&! Premature&mortality&! Incarceration&of&perpetrators&! Absenteeism&! Crime&(loss&of&work&among&victims)&! Fetal&alcohol&syndrome& Other&! Criminal&justice&(police,&court&system,&corrections,&legal&costs)&! Motor&vehicle&crashes&! Fire&losses&! Crime&victim&property&damage&! Fetal&alcohol&syndrome& &special&education& & & Bouchery&et&al.&further&identified&who&was&responsible&for&paying&the&alcoholSrelated&costs&and& the&following&percentages&were&carried&over&to&determine&the&breakdown&of&costs&in&wisconsin:& & Table$1:&&Percentage&of&alcoholSrelated&costs&attributed&to&each&payer&type&by&category* 23 & & Excessive$drinker$ Others$in$ Government$ and$family$ society$ Healthcare& 60.9& 10.3& 28.8& Lost&productivity& 35.1& 54.6& 10.4& Criminal&justice& 98.8& 1.1& 0& Motor&vehicle&crashes& 0& 14.2& 85.8& Other& 65.8& 4.8& 29.3& *Totals&may¬&equal&100%&due&to&rounding&adjustments& & Per&capita&costs&were&determined&by&dividing&the&estimated&state&and&county&costs&by&the&total& population&in&the&state&and&each&county,&respectively.& $ Others!in!society! includes!private! health!insurers,! employers,!crime! victims,!and!others.! $ $ $ 3
6 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! $ $ $ 4 Results$ Economic(Costs( The&estimated&total&annual&economic&cost&of&excessive&drinking&in&Wisconsin&is&$6.8&billion.&On&a& per&capita&basis,&this&cost&is&approximately&$1,198&for&each&man,&woman,&and&child&in&wisconsin.& Of&the&total&cost,&$2.9&billion&came&from&impaired&productivity;&$2&billion&came&from&premature& mortality&costs;&$749&million&came&from&increased&healthcare&costs;&$649&million&came&from& criminal&justice&costs;&$418&million&came&from&motor&vehicle&costs;&and&$90&million&came&from& other&effects.& & Healthcare&Costs& Of&the&$749&million&in&health&expenditures& attributable&to&alcohol,&$325&million&(43.4%)&was& from&specialty&treatment&for&alcohol&abuse&and& dependence&and&$156&million&(20.8%)&from& hospitalizations&for&other&medical&conditions& stemming&from&excessive&drinking.&& & Lost&Productivity&Costs& The&two&largest&productivity&losses&were&from& lost&productivity&at&work,&estimated&at&$1.3& billion&(45.9%)&and&$1.2&billion&(40.3%)&in&lost& productivity&in&premature&mortality.&& & Other&Costs&& The&two&largest&costs&were&criminal&justice&system&costs&(55.7%)&and&motor&vehicle&crashes& (36.4%).&Of&the&$649&million&in&Wisconsin&criminal&justice&system&costs,&Bouchery&et&al.& determined&76.8%,&or&$498&million&in&wisconsin,&came&from&crimes&that&would¬&be& thought&of&as&solely&alcoholsattributable&(e.g.,&assault)&as&opposed&to&obviously&alcohols attributable&crimes&like&driving&under&the&influence&of&alcohol.& & Of&the&total&$498&million&cost&of&alcoholSattributable&crime,&43.8%&came&from&crashSrelated& costs&from&driving&under&the&influence,&17.2%&came&from&corrections&costs,&and&15.1%&came& from&lost&productivity&associated&with&homicide.& & Who&Bears&the&Cost& In&Wisconsin,&$2.9&billion&of&the&total&economic&cost&of&excessive&alcohol&was&borne&by& government,&including&federal,&state,&and&local&government&agencies&(table&2);&$2.8&billion& use&was&borne&by&excessive&drinkers&and&their&family&members;&and&$1.1&billion&was&borne& by&others&in&society,&including&private&health&insurers,&employers,&and&others.&& &!! Healthcare& $749&million& Other& $1.1&billion& Lost&Productivity& $4.9&billion&
7 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! Table$2:&&US&National&and&Wisconsin&alcohol&cost&estimates&by&category&and&payer&($,&millions)& && 2006(National(Estimate( (Bouchery,(2011)( 2012(National(Estimate( (adjusted(for(inflation)( 2012(Wisconsin(Estimate( && Society a $ Government b $ Society$ Government$ Society$ Government$ TOTAL$ 223,478.6& 94,195.8& 257,000.4& 108,325.2& 6,810.5& 2,867.2& Healthcare& 24,555.6& 14,954.4& 28,238.9& 17,197.5& 748.7& 456.0& Lost&productivity& 161,286.1& 56,611.4& 185,479.0& 65,103.1& 4,917.8& 1,726.1& Criminal&justice& 20,972.7& 20,742.0& 24,118.6& 23,853.3& 639.5& 632.4& Motor&vehicle&crashes& 13,718.4& 0& 15,776.2& 0& 418.3& 0& Other& 2,945.9& 1,938.4& 3,387.8& 2,229.2& 89.8& 59.1& a &Society&refers&to&all&payers&(government,&excessive&drinker&and&family,&and&others&in&society)& b &Government&refers&to&all&government&entities;&Federal,&State,&and&local.& & Discussion$ The&burden&of&excessive&alcohol&consumption&in&Wisconsin&is&manifested&in&social,&health,&and& economic&damages.&although&this&burden&is¬&shared&equally&by&everyone&in&the&state,&its& impact&is&felt&by&everyone&because&many&of&the&costs&filter&throughout&the&economy&via&higher& insurance&rates,&diverted&government&spending&to&address&substance&abuse&related&crimes&and& consequences,&lost&economic&output,&and&higher&healthcare&costs.& & It&should&be¬ed&that,&although&the&$6.8&billion&fıgure&is&the&best¤tly&available&estimate& of&the&cost&of&excessive&drinking&in&wisconsin,&bouchery&et&al.&caution&that&it&is&a&substantial& underestimate&due&to&data&limitations,&conservative&estimates,&and&the&nonsinclusion&of& intangible&costs&like&pain,&suffering,&and&bereavement.&& & Despite&these&limitations,&this&study&shows&that&the&economic&impact&of&excessive&alcohol& consumption&is&carried&by&people&other&than&the&excessive&drinkers&themselves.&the&$56&million& in&2012&state&revenues&from&alcohol&taxes 31 &do¬&begin&to&cover&the&economic&costs.&& & Effective&interventions&to&reduce&excessive&alcohol&consumption& &including&increasing&alcohol& excise&taxes,&limiting&alcohol&outlet&density,&maintaining&and&enforcing&the&minimum&legal& drinking&age&of&21&years,&and&specifıc&countermeasures&for&alcoholsimpaired&driving&such&as& sobriety&checkpoints& &are&available&but&are&underutilized&in&reducing&the&health,&social,&and& economic&impacts&of&excessive&drinking.&for&more&information®arding&evidencesbased& prevention&strategies,&visit&what&works&for&health&( Wisconsin&State&Council&on&Alcohol&and&Other&Drug&Abuse s&report&on&alcohol,&culture&and& Environment&( Guide&( & Estimates&of&the&economic&cost&of&excessive&alcohol&consumption&in&each&county&are&provided& to&facilitate&local&discussion,&planning,&and&action.& & $ $ $ 5
8 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! $ $ $ 6 Acknowledgements$ & The&University&of&Wisconsin&Population&Health&Institute&would&like&to&thank&the&following& people&for&providing&data,&expertise,&and&support&in&developing&this&report:& & Jeremy$Arney,&PhD,&Assistant&Professor,&Public&Administration&and&Political&Science& University&of&Wisconsin,&La&Crosse& & Richard$L.$Brown,&MD,&MPH,&Professor&& University&of&Wisconsin&School&of&Medicine&and&Public&Health& & Barry$Busby,&County&Coroner& Winnebago&County& & Maureen$Bussalachi,&Executive&Director& Health&First&Wisconsin& & Dorothy$Chaney,&Proprietor&and&Director& Wisconsin&Community&Health&Alliance& & Melissa$Dotter,&Drug&Free&Communities&Program&Coordinator& Marathon&County&Health&Department/Marathon&County&AOD&Partnership&Council& & Chris$Fitzgerald,&Sheriff& Barron&County& & Honorable$Judge$Daniel$Koval$ City&of&Madison&Municipal&Court& & Paul$Krupski,&Alcohol&Policy&and&Grassroots&Specialist& Health&First&Wisconsin& & Sarah$Apple$Mattes,&Communication&Coordinator& Wisconsin&Clearinghouse&for&Prevention&Resources& & Francie$McGuire`Winkler,&Executive&Director& Focus&on&Community& & Jacob$Melson,&Epidemiologist& Great&Lakes&InterSTribal&Council/Great&Lakes&InterSTribal&Epidemiology&Center& & Christine$Niemuth,&Prevention&Coordinator,&Substance&Abuse&Services&Section& Bureau&of&Prevention&Treatment&and&Recovery,&Wisconsin&Department&of&Health&Services& & Lou$Oppor,&Section&Chief,&Substance&Abuse&Services&Section& Bureau&of&Prevention&Treatment&and&Recovery,&Wisconsin&Department&of&Health&Services& & Rick$Peterson,&Director,&Crawford&Abuse&Resistance&Effort&(CARE)&Council& Prairie&du&Chien&Memorial&Hospital& & $
9 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! Jeffrey$J.$Sacks,&MD,&MPH,&Public&Health&Consultant& Sue&Binder&Consulting,&Inc.& & Julia$Sherman,&Coordinator,&Wisconsin&Alcohol&Policy&Project& University&of&Wisconsin&Law&School& & Tom$Sieger,&Director&of&Prevention&Services&and&Campus&Health&Initiatives& University&of&Wisconsin&University&Health&Services& & Anne$Ziege,&PhD,&Behavioral&Risk&Factor&Survey&Director& Wisconsin&Division&of&Public&Health,&Wisconsin&Department&of&Health&Services& & & Funding&for&this&project&was&provided&by&the&University&of&Wisconsin&School&of&Medicine&and& Public&Health&from&the&Wisconsin&Partnership&Program.& & & & Suggested&Citation:&Black&PD,&Paltzer&JT.&The&Burden&of&Excessive&Alcohol&Use&in&Wisconsin.& University&of&Wisconsin&Population&Health&Institute,&February&2013.& & $ $ $ $ $ 7
10 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! References$and$Endnotes$ 1. American&Academy&of&Pediatrics,&Committee&on&Substance&Abuse&and&Committee&on& Children&with&Disabilities.&2000.&Fetal&alcohol&syndrome&and&alcoholSrelated& neurodevelopmental&disorders.&pediatrics;&106: ,&2000.& 2. Baan&R,&Straif&K,&Grosse&Y,&Secretan&B,&et&al.&on&behalf&of&the&WHO&International&Agency&for& Research&on&Cancer&Monograph&Working&Group.&Carcinogenicity&of&alcoholic& beverages.&&lancet(oncol.&8: ,&2007.& 3. Booth&BM,&Feng&W.&The&impact&of&drinking&and&drinking&consequences&on&shortSterm& employment&outcomes&in&atsrisk&drinkers&in&six&southern&states.&j(behavioral(health( Services(and(Research;&29(2): ,&2002.& 4. Caetano&R,&Kaplan&MS,&Huguet&N,&McFarland&BH,&Conner&K,&Giesbrecht&N&and&Nolte&KB.& Acute&Alcohol&Intoxication&and&Suicide&Among&United&States&Ethnic/Racial&Groups:&Findings& from&the&national&violent&death&reporting&system.&alcoholism:&clinical&and&experimental& Research.&Published&online&first&February&5,&2013.& 5. Corrao&G,&Bagnardi&V,&Zambon&A,&La&Vecchia&C.&A&metaSanalysis&of&alcohol&consumption&and& the&risk&of&15&diseases.&prev(med;&38: ,&2004.& 6. Feldman&SH,&Jones&KL,&Lindsay&S,&Slymen&D,&KlonoffSCohen&H,&Kao&K,&Rao&S,&and&Chambers& C.&Prenatal&Alcohol&Exposure&Patterns&and&AlcoholSRelated&Birth&Defects&and&Growth& Deficiencies:&A&Prospective&Study.&Alcoholism:&Clinical&and&Experimental&Research,&36:& ,&2012.& 7. Kesmodel&U,&Wisborg&K,&Olsen&SF,&Henriksen&TB,&Sechler&NJ.&Moderate&alcohol&intake&in& pregnancy&and&the&risk&of&spontaneous&abortion.&alcohol(&(alcoholism;&37(1):87 92,&2002.& 8. Miller&TR,&Teti&LO,&Lawrence&BA,&and&Weiss&HB.&Alcohol&involvement&in&hospitalSadmitted& nonfatal&suicide&acts.&suicide&and&lifesthreatening&behavior,&40&(5):&492s499,&2010.& 9. Naimi&TS,&Lipscomb&LE,&Brewer&RD,&Colley&BG.&Binge&drinking&in&the&preconception&period& and&the&risk&of&unintended&pregnancy:&implications&for&women&and&their& children.&pediatrics,(11(5): ,&2003.& 10. Nelson&DE,&Jarman&DW,&Rehm&J,&Greenfield&TK,&Rey&G,&Kerr&WC,&Miller&P,&Shield&KD,&Ye&Y,& and&naimi&ts.&alcoholsattributable&cancer&deaths&and&years&of&potential&life&lost&in&the& United&States.&American&Journal&of&Public&Health,&published&online&ahead&of&print&February& 14,&2013.& 11. Rehm&J,&Gmel&G,&Sepos&CT,&Trevisan&M.&AlcoholSrelated&morbidity&and&mortality.&Alcohol( Research(and(Health;&27(1)39 51,&2003.& 12. Sanap&M,&Chapman&MJ.&Severeðanol&poisoning:&a&case&report&and&brief&review.&Crit(Care( Resusc;&5(2): ,&2003.& 13. Shults&RA,&Elder&RW,&Hungerford&DW,&Strife&BJ,&and&Ryan&GW.&Emergency&department&visits& for&alcoholsrelated&unintentional&traumatic&injuries,&united&states,&2001.&journal&of&safety& Research,&40&(4):&329S331,&August&2009.& 14. Taylor&B,&Irving&HM,&Kanteres&F,&Room&R,&Borges&G,&and&Cherpitel&C.&The&more&you&drink,& the&harder&you&fall:&a&systematic&review&and&metasanalysis&of&how´&alcohol& consumption&and&injury&or&collision&risk&increase&together.&drug&and&alcohol&dependence,& 110&(2010):&108S116,&2010.& $ $ $ 8
11 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! 15. Widom&CS,&HillerSSturmhöfel&S.$Alcohol&Abuse&as&a&Risk&Factor&for&and&Consequence&of& Child&Abuse.&Alcohol&Research&&&Health,&25&(1):&52,&2001.& 16. Wisconsin&Department&of&Health&Services.&Wisconsin&resident&death&certificates.&Annual& average&numbers&2002s2010.&& 17. Wisconsin&Department&of&Health&Services.&Wisconsin&hospital&inpatient&discharge&database.& 2011.& 18. Wisconsin&Division&of&Mental&Health&and&Substance&Abuse&Services.&Human&Services& Reporting&System&staff&data&query.&2013.& 19. Wisconsin&Statistical&Analysis&Center,&Wisconsin&Office&of&Justice&Assistance.&Arrests&in& Wisconsin&2010.&2011.& 20. Wisconsin&Department&of&Transportation.&2010&Wisconsin&Traffic&Crash&Facts,&Section&V:& Alcohol.&2011.& 21. Centers&for&Disease&Control&and&Prevention.&Vital&Signs:&Binge&Drinking&Prevalence,& Frequency,&and&Intensity&Among&Adults& &United&States,&2010.&Morbidity&and&Mortality& Weekly&Report;&61(1):14S19,&2012.&& 22. National&Institute&of&Alcohol&Abuse&and&Alcoholism.&NIAAA&council&approves&definition&of& binge&drinking.&niaaa(newsletter,(3:&3,&2004.& 23. Bouchery,&E.E.,&Henrick,&J.H.,&Sacks,&J.J.,&Simon,&C.J.,&Brewer,&R.D.&Economic&Costs&of& Excessive&Alcohol&Consumption&in&the&U.S.,&2006.&American&Journal&of&Preventive&Medicine,& 41(5):516S524,&2011.& 24. United&States&Bureau&of&Labor&Statistics.&Consumer&Price&Index&Inflation&Calculator.& Available&at& 25. New&Mexico&Department&of&Health,&Epidemiology&and&Response&Division&(2009)&The& Human&and&Economic&Cost&of&Alcohol&Abuse&in&New&Mexico,&2006.&New&Mexico& Epidemiology&2009(10).& 26. Whelan&R,&Josephson&A,&Holcome&J.&The&Economic&Costs&of&Alcohol&and&Drug&Abuse&in& Oregon&in&2006.&2008.& 27. Minnesota&Department&of&Health.&The&Human&and&Economic&Cost&of&Alcohol&Use&in& Minnesota.&(January&2004,&updated&March&2006)&& 28. Wisconsin&Department&of&Health&Services.&Behavioral&Risk&Factor&Surveillance&System.&& a.&the&binge&drinking&rate&from&2007&was&used&to&determine&the&number&of&binge&drinkers& in&the&united&states.& b.&binge&drinking&rates&from&2006s2008&were&used&for&county&analysis&due&to&small&sample& sizes&and&available&weights.&binge&drinking&rates&from&2006s2008&were&used&for&state& analysis&to&be&consistent&with&county&analyses.& 29. United&States&Census&Bureau:&American&Fact&Finder.&2010&population&estimates.& 30. Centers&for&Disease&Control&and&Prevention,&AlcoholSRelated&Disease&Impact&Software& (ARDI),&available&at& application&that&provides&national&and&state&estimates&of&alcoholsrelated&health&impacts,& including&deaths&and&years&of&potential&life&lost&(ypll).&these&estimates&are&calculated&for& 54´&and&chronic&causes&using&alcoholSattributable&fractions.& 31. Wisconsin&Department&of&Revenue.&Annual&Fiscal&Report:&Budgetary&Basis.&2012.& & & $ $ $ 9
12 $ THE$BURDEN$OF$EXCESSIVE$ALCOHOL$USE$IN$WISCONSIN!! Appendix&1& &Prevalence&of&Binge&Drinking&and&Proportion&of&Binge&Drinkers&by&County& & Prevalence&refers&to&the&percentage&of&adults,&ages&18+,&who&report&binge&drinking.& Proportion&refers&to&the&contribution&of&each&county&to&the&state s&overall&prevalence.& & $ Prevalence$ Proportion$ $ $ Prevalence$ Proportion$ Adams& 22%& 0.4%& & Marathon& 22%& 2.2%& Ashland& 26%& 0.3%& & Marinette& 25%& 0.8%& Barron& 26%& 0.9%& & Marquette& 21%& 0.3%& Bayfield& 18%& 0.2%& & Menominee& 34%& 0.1%& Brown& 25%& 4.7%& & Milwaukee& 21%& 15.0%& Buffalo& 23%& 0.2%& & Monroe& 26%& 0.9%& Burnett& 17%& 0.2%& & Oconto& 33%& 1.0%& Calumet& 38%& 1.4%& & Oneida& 19%& 0.6%& Chippewa& 20%& 1.0%& & Outagamie& 30%& 4.0%& Clark& 23%& 0.6%& & Ozaukee& 17%& 1.1%& Columbia& 29%& 1.3%& & Pepin& 19%& 0.1%& Crawford& 25%& 0.3%& & Pierce& 31%& 1.0%& Dane& 25%& 9.6%& & Polk& 26%& 0.9%& Dodge& 24%& 1.7%& & Portage& 20%& 1.1%& Door& 25%& 0.6%& & Price& 21%& 0.2%& Douglas& 25%& 0.9%& & Racine& 25%& 3.7%& Dunn& 18%& 0.6%& & Richland& 17%& 0.2%& Eau&Claire& 30%& 2.4%& & Rock& 24%& 2.9%& Florence& 28%& 0.1%& & Rusk& 16%& 0.2%& Fond&du&Lac& 22%& 1.7%& & St.&Croix& 25%& 1.5%& Forest& 22%& 0.2%& & Sauk& 22%& 1.0%& Grant& 28%& 1.1%& & Sawyer& 25%& 0.3%& Green& 23%& 0.6%& & Shawano& 21%& 0.7%& Green&Lake& 16%& 0.2%& & Sheboygan& 32%& 2.8%& Iowa& 24%& 0.4%& & Taylor& 28%& 0.4%& Iron& 29%& 0.1%& & Trempealeau& 26%& 0.6%& Jackson& 17%& 0.3%& & Vernon& 28%& 0.6%& Jefferson& 23%& 1.5%& & Vilas& 15%& 0.3%& Juneau& 18%& 0.4%& & Walworth& 21%& 1.7%& Kenosha& 19%& 2.4%& & Washburn& 16%& 0.2%& Kewaunee& 32%& 0.5%& & Washington& 23%& 2.3%& La&Crosse& 17%& 1.5%& & Waukesha& 18%& 5.4%& Lafayette& 17%& 0.2%& & Waupaca& 24%& 1.0%& Langlade& 29%& 0.5%& & Waushara& 21%& 0.4%& Lincoln& 23%& 0.5%& & Winnebago& 24%& 3.2%& Manitowoc& 27%& 1.7%& & Wood& 19%& 0.1%& $ $ $ 10
13 The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Wisconsin $6.8 BILLION What We Pay For 1,2 We All Pay 1,2 $6.8 billion $6.8 billion $2.9 billion Lost Productivity Alcohol tax collection falls short $2.9 billion Taxpayers 1% $2.0 billion Premature Death Wisconsin collected $2.8 billion Excessive Drinkers and their Families $56 million in alcohol taxes in $749 million Healthcare less than 1% of the $6.8 billion in economic costs attributed to $649 million Criminal Justice $418 million Motor Vehicle $90 million Other excessive alcohol use. $1.1 billion Others in Society (including health insurers, employers) Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption contributed to at least: - 1,529 deaths 4-48,578 hospitalizations 5 How We Got Here High Consumption Wisconsin s annual alcohol consumption is 28% higher than the national average. 9 28% - 46,583 treatment admissions 6-60,221 arrests 7-5,751 motor vehicle crashes 8 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at #1 in Binge Drinking Wisconsin ranks highest among all states in binge drinking, an important risk factor for alcohol related injuries and deaths. 9 Binge drinking = 5+ drinks on an occasion for men; 4+ drinks for women. Excessive alcohol use in Wisconsin costs $1,200 per person
14 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer J. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41 (5): , Wisconsin Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index Inflation Calculator. Available at The calculator was used to inflate estimates to 2012 dollars. 3 Wisconsin Department of Revenue. Annual Fiscal Report: Budgetary Basis Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. Human Services Reporting System staff data query Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Transportation Wisconsin Traffic Crash Facts, Section V: Alcohol Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
15 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Adams County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Adams County What We Pay For 1 $26.2 million $2.9 million Healthcare $26.2 MILLION We All Pay 1 $11.1 million Taxpayers $26.2 million $18.9 million Lost Productivity $10.9 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $4.4 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Adams County population: 20,875 2 Cost per Adams County resident: $1, How We Got Here $4.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Adams County contributed to at least: 9 alcohol-related deaths 3 7 alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Binge Drinking Rates 7 Adams County 22% WI 23% US 16%
16 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
17 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Ashland County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Ashland County What We Pay For 1 $22.1 million $2.4 million Healthcare $22.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $9.3 million Taxpayers $22.1 million $15.9 million Lost Productivity $9.2 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $3.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Ashland County population: 16,157 2 Cost per Ashland County resident: $1, How We Got Here $3.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Ashland County contributed to at least: 5 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Binge Drinking Rates 7 Ashland County WI 26% 23% US 16%
18 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
19 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Barron County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Barron County What We Pay For 1 $63.5 million $7.0 million Healthcare $63.5 MILLION We All Pay 1 $26.7 million Taxpayers $63.5 million $45.8 million Lost Productivity $26.4 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $10.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Barron County population: 45,870 2 Cost per Barron County resident: $1, How We Got Here $10.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Barron County contributed to at least: 12 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Barron County 26% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
20 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
21 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Bayfield County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Bayfield County What We Pay For 1 $15.0 million $1.6 million Healthcare $15.0 MILLION We All Pay 1 $6.3 million Taxpayers $15.0 million $10.8 million Lost Productivity $6.2 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families Bayfield County population: 15,012 2 $2.5 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Cost per Bayfield County resident: $ How We Got Here $2.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Bayfield County contributed to at least: 6 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 36 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Bayfield County 18% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
22 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
23 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Brown County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Brown County What We Pay For 1 $318 million $35.0 million Healthcare $318 MILLION We All Pay 1 $318 million $134.0 million Taxpayers $229.8 million Lost Productivity $132.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $53.6 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Brown County population: 248,007 2 Cost per Brown County resident: $1, How We Got Here $51.9 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Brown County contributed to at least: 59 alcohol-related deaths 3 2,030 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 3,024 alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Brown County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
24 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
25 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Buffalo County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Buffalo County What We Pay For 1 $16.7 million $1.8 million Healthcare $16.7 MILLION We All Pay 1 $7.0 million Taxpayers $16.7 million $12.0 million Lost Productivity $6.9 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $2.8 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Buffalo County population: 13,587 2 Cost per Buffalo County resident: $1, How We Got Here $2.7 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Buffalo County contributed to at least: 6 alcohol-related deaths 3 83 alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Buffalo County 23% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
26 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
27 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Burnett County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Burnett County What We Pay For 1 $14.5 million $1.6 million Healthcare $14.5 MILLION We All Pay 1 $6.1 million Taxpayers $14.5 million $10.4 million Lost Productivity $6.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families Burnett County population: 15,457 2 $2.4 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Cost per Burnett County resident: $ How We Got Here $2.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Burnett County contributed to at least: 5 alcohol-related deaths 3 85 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 77 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Burnett County 17% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
28 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
29 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Calumet County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Calumet County What We Pay For 1 $93.1 million $10.2 million Healthcare $93.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $39.2 million Taxpayers $93.1 million $67.2 million Lost Productivity $38.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $15.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Calumet County population: 48,971 2 Cost per Calumet County resident: $1, How We Got Here $15.2 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Calumet County contributed to at least: 10 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption Calumet by pregnant women. 6 County 38% Binge Drinking Rates 7 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 WI 23% US 16%
30 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
31 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Chippewa County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Chippewa County What We Pay For 1 $65.4 million $7.2 million Healthcare $65.4 MILLION We All Pay 1 $27.5 million Taxpayers $65.4 million $47.2 million Lost Productivity $27.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $11.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Chippewa County population: 62,415 2 Cost per Chippewa County resident: $1, How We Got Here $10.7 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Chippewa County contributed to at least: 16 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Chippewa County 20% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
32 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
33 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Clark County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Clark County What We Pay For 1 $38.6 million $4.2 million Healthcare $38.6 MILLION We All Pay 1 $16.3 million Taxpayers $38.6 million $27.9 million Lost Productivity $16.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $6.5 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Clark County population: 34,690 2 Cost per Clark County resident: $1, How We Got Here $6.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Clark County contributed to at least: 8 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Clark County 23% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
34 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
35 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Columbia County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Columbia County What We Pay For 1 $86.6 million $9.5 million Healthcare $86.6 MILLION We All Pay 1 $36.5 million Taxpayers $86.6 million $62.5 million Lost Productivity $36.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $14.6 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Columbia County population: 56,833 2 Cost per Columbia County resident: $1, How We Got Here $14.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Columbia County contributed to at least: 15 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Columbia County 29% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
36 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
37 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Crawford County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Crawford County What We Pay For 1 $22.1 million $2.4 million Healthcare $22.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $9.3 million Taxpayers $22.1 million $16.0 million Lost Productivity $9.2 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $3.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Crawford County population: 16,644 2 Cost per Crawford County resident: $1, How We Got Here $3.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Crawford County contributed to at least: 5 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Crawford County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
38 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
39 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Dane County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Dane County What We Pay For 1 $654.8 million $72.0 million Healthcare $654.8 MILLION We All Pay 1 $654.8 million $275.7 million Taxpayers $472.6 million Lost Productivity $271.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $110.3 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Dane County population: 488,073 2 Cost per Dane County resident: $1, How We Got Here $106.7 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Dane County contributed to at least: 98 alcohol-related deaths 3 3,706 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 5,824 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Dane County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
40 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
41 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Dodge County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Dodge County What We Pay For 1 $113.7 million $12.5 million Healthcare $113.7 MILLION We All Pay 1 $47.9 million Taxpayers $113.7 million $82.1 million Lost Productivity $47.2 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $19.2 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Dodge County population: 88,759 2 Cost per Dodge County resident: $1, How We Got Here $18.5 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Dodge County contributed to at least: 21 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Dodge County 24% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
42 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
43 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Door County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Door County What We Pay For 1 $38.9 million $4.3 million Healthcare $38.9 MILLION We All Pay 1 $16.4 million Taxpayers $38.9 million $28.1 million Lost Productivity $16.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $6.6 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Door County population: 27,785 2 Cost per Door County resident: $1, How We Got Here $6.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Door County contributed to at least: 7 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Door County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
44 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
45 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Douglas County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Douglas County What We Pay For 1 $59.2 million $6.5 million Healthcare $59.2 MILLION We All Pay 1 $24.9 million Taxpayers $59.2 million $42.8 million Lost Productivity $24.6 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $10.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Douglas County population: 44,159 2 Cost per Douglas County resident: $1, How We Got Here $9.7 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Douglas County contributed to at least: 13 alcohol-related deaths 3 49 alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Douglas County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
46 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
47 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Dunn County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Dunn County What We Pay For 1 $43 million $4.7 million Healthcare $43 MILLION We All Pay 1 $18.1 million Taxpayers $43 million $31.0 million Lost Productivity $17.9 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $7.2 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Dunn County population: 43,857 2 Cost per Dunn County resident: $ How We Got Here $7.0 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Dunn County contributed to at least: 11 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Dunn County 18% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
48 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
49 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Eau Claire County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Eau Claire County What We Pay For 1 $160.4 million $17.6 million Healthcare $160.4 MILLION We All Pay 1 $67.5 million Taxpayers $160.4 million $115.7 million Lost Productivity $66.6 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $27.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Eau Claire County population: 98,736 2 Cost per Eau Claire County resident: $1, How We Got Here $26.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Eau Claire County contributed to at least: 19 alcohol-related deaths 3 1,115 alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Eau Claire County 30% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
50 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
51 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Florence County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Florence County What We Pay For 1 $7 million $0.8 million Healthcare $7 MILLION We All Pay 1 $3.0 million Taxpayers $7 million $5.1 million Lost Productivity $2.9 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $1.2 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Florence County population: 4,423 2 Cost per Florence County resident: $1, How We Got Here $1.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Florence County contributed to at least: 3 alcohol-related deaths 3 19 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 33 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Florence County 28% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
52 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
53 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Fond du Lac County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Fond du Lac County $118.2 MILLION What We Pay For 1 $118.2 million $13.0 million Healthcare We All Pay 1 $49.7 million Taxpayers $118.2 million $85.3 million Lost Productivity $49.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $19.9 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Fond du Lac County population: 101,633 2 Cost per Fond du Lac County resident: $1, How We Got Here $19.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Fond du Lac County contributed to at least: 24 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 1,046 alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Fond du Lac County 22% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
54 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
55 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Forest County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Forest County What We Pay For 1 $10.9 million $1.2 million Healthcare $10.9 MILLION We All Pay 1 $4.6 million Taxpayers $10.9 million $8.0 million Lost Productivity $4.5 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $1.8 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Forest County population: 9,304 2 Cost per Forest County resident: $1, How We Got Here $1.8 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Forest County contributed to at least: 5 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 85 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Forest County 22% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
56 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
57 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Grant County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Grant County What We Pay For 1 $77.3 million $8.5 million Healthcare $77.3 MILLION We All Pay 1 $32.6 million Taxpayers $77.3 million $55.8 million Lost Productivity $32.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $13.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Grant County population: 51,208 2 Cost per Grant County resident: $1, How We Got Here $12.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Grant County contributed to at least: 10 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Grant County 28% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
58 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
59 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Green Lake County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Green Lake County What We Pay For 1 $16.1 million $1.8 million Healthcare $16.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $6.8 million Taxpayers $16.1 million $11.6 million Lost Productivity $6.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $2.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Green Lake County population: 19,051 2 Cost per Green Lake County resident: $ How We Got Here $2.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Green Lake County contributed to at least: 7 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Green Lake County 16% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
60 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
61 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Green County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Green County What We Pay For 1 $44 million $4.8 million Healthcare $44 MILLION We All Pay 1 $18.5 million Taxpayers $44 million $31.7 million Lost Productivity $18.3 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $7.4 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Green County population: 36,842 2 Cost per Green County resident: $1, How We Got Here $7.2 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Green County contributed to at least: 8 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Green County 23% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
62 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
63 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Iowa County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Iowa County What We Pay For 1 $29.3 million $3.2 million Healthcare $29.3 MILLION We All Pay 1 $12.4 million Taxpayers $29.3 million $21.2 million Lost Productivity $12.2 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $4.9 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Iowa County population: 26,687 2 Cost per Iowa County resident: $1, How We Got Here $4.8 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Iowa County contributed to at least: 7 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Iowa County 24% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
64 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
65 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Iron County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Iron County What We Pay For 1 $9.8 million $1.1 million Healthcare $9.8 MILLION We All Pay 1 $4.1 million Taxpayers $9.8 million $7.1 million Lost Productivity $4.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $1.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Iron County population: 5,916 2 Cost per Iron County resident: $1, How We Got Here $1.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Iron County contributed to at least: 2 alcohol-related deaths 3 42 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 72 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Iron County 29% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
66 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
67 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Jackson County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Jackson County What We Pay For 1 $18.4 million $2.0 million Healthcare $18.4 MILLION We All Pay 1 $7.7 million Taxpayers $18.4 million $13.3 million Lost Productivity $7.6 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $3.1 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Jackson County population: 20,449 2 Cost per Jackson County resident: $ How We Got Here $3.0 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Jackson County contributed to at least: 5 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Jackson County 17% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
68 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
69 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Jefferson County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Jefferson County What We Pay For 1 $100.4 million $11.0 million Healthcare $100.4 MILLION We All Pay 1 $42.3 million Taxpayers $100.4 million $72.5 million Lost Productivity $41.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $16.9 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Jefferson County population: 83,686 2 Cost per Jefferson County resident: $1, How We Got Here $16.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Jefferson County contributed to at least: 18 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Jefferson County 23% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
70 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
71 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Juneau County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Juneau County What We Pay For 1 $25.9 million $2.8 million Healthcare $25.9 MILLION We All Pay 1 $10.9 million Taxpayers $25.9 million $18.7 million Lost Productivity $10.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $4.4 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Juneau County population: 26,664 2 Cost per Juneau County resident: $ How We Got Here $4.2 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Juneau County contributed to at least: 10 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 63 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Juneau County 18% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
72 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
73 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Kenosha County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Kenosha County What We Pay For 1 $161.1 million $17.7 million Healthcare $161.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $67.8 million Taxpayers $161.1 million $116.2 million Lost Productivity $66.8 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $27.1 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Kenosha County population: 166,426 2 Cost per Kenosha County resident: $ How We Got Here $26.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Kenosha County contributed to at least: 45 alcohol-related deaths 3 1,624 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 1,979 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Kenosha County 19% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
74 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
75 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Kewaunee County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Kewaunee County What We Pay For 1 $34.6 million $3.8 million Healthcare $34.6 MILLION We All Pay 1 $14.6 million Taxpayers $34.6 million $25.0 million Lost Productivity $14.3 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $5.8 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Kewaunee County population: 20,574 2 Cost per Kewaunee County resident: $1, How We Got Here $5.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Kewaunee County contributed to at least: 5 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Kewaunee County Binge Drinking Rates 7 32% Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 WI 23% US 16%
76 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
77 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in La Crosse County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in La Crosse County What We Pay For 1 $105 million $11.5 million Healthcare $105 MILLION We All Pay 1 $44.2 million Taxpayers $105 million $75.8 million Lost Productivity $43.6 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $17.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use La Crosse County population: 114,638 2 Cost per La Crosse County resident: $ How We Got Here $17.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in La Crosse County contributed to at least: 28 alcohol-related deaths 3 1,285 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 2,044 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 La Crosse County 17% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
78 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
79 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Lafayette County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Lafayette County What We Pay For 1 $14.6 million $1.6 million Healthcare $14.6 MILLION We All Pay 1 $6.1 million Taxpayers $14.6 million $10.5 million Lost Productivity $6.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $2.5 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Lafayette County population: 16,836 2 Cost per Lafayette County resident: $ How We Got Here $2.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Lafayette County contributed to at least: 6 alcohol-related deaths 3 80 alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Lafayette County 17% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
80 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
81 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Langlade County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Langlade County What We Pay For 1 $31.4 million $3.5 million Healthcare $31.4 MILLION We All Pay 1 $13.2 million Taxpayers $31.4 million $22.7 million Lost Productivity $13.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $5.3 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Langlade County population: 19,977 2 Cost per Langlade County resident: $1, How We Got Here $5.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Langlade County contributed to at least: 7 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Langlade County 29% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
82 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
83 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Lincoln County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Lincoln County What We Pay For 1 $35.3 million $3.9 million Healthcare $35.3 MILLION We All Pay 1 $14.9 million Taxpayers $35.3 million $25.5 million Lost Productivity $14.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $6.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Lincoln County population: 28,943 2 Cost per Lincoln County resident: $1, How We Got Here $5.8 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Lincoln County contributed to at least: 10 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Lincoln County 23% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
84 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
85 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Marathon County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Marathon County $152.4 MILLION What We Pay For 1 $152.4 million $16.8 million Healthcare We All Pay 1 $64.2 million Taxpayers $152.4 million $110.0 million Lost Productivity $63.3 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $25.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Marathon County population: 134,400 2 Cost per Marathon County resident: $1, How We Got Here $24.9 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Marathon County contributed to at least: 31 alcohol-related deaths 3 1,318 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 1,392 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Marathon County 22% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
86 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
87 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Marinette County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Marinette County What We Pay For 1 $57.1 million $6.3 million Healthcare $57.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $24.0 million Taxpayers $57.1 million $41.2 million Lost Productivity $23.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $9.6 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Marinette County population: 41,656 2 Cost per Marinette County resident: $1, How We Got Here $9.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Marinette County contributed to at least: 15 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Marinette County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
88 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
89 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Marquette County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Marquette County What We Pay For 1 $17.7 million $1.9 million Healthcare $17.7 MILLION We All Pay 1 $7.4 million Taxpayers $17.7 million $12.8 million Lost Productivity $7.3 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $3.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Marquette County population: 15,439 2 Cost per Marquette County resident: $1, How We Got Here $2.9 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Marquette County contributed to at least: 7 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 71 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Marquette County 21% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
90 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
91 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Menominee County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Menominee County What We Pay For 1 $6.5 million $0.7 million Healthcare $6.5 MILLION We All Pay 1 $2.8 million Taxpayers $6.5 million $4.7 million Lost Productivity $2.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $1.1 million Other Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Menominee County population: 4,348 2 Cost per Menominee County resident: $1, Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. How We Got Here $1.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Menominee County contributed to at least: 3 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Menominee County Binge Drinking Rates 7 34% Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 WI 23% US 16%
92 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
93 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Milwaukee County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Milwaukee County What We Pay For 1 $1 billion $112.0 million Healthcare $1 BILLION We All Pay 1 $429.1 million Taxpayers $1 billion $735.5 million Lost Productivity $422.9 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $171.6 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Milwaukee County population: 952,532 2 Cost per Milwaukee County resident: $1, How We Got Here $166.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Milwaukee County contributed to at least: 354 alcohol-related deaths 3 10,393 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 6,387 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Binge Drinking Rates 7 Milwaukee County 21% WI 23% US 16%
94 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, February References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
95 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Monroe County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Monroe County What We Pay For 1 $58.8 million $6.5 million Healthcare $58.8 MILLION We All Pay 1 $24.7 million Taxpayers $58.8 million $42.4 million Lost Productivity $24.4 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $9.9 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Monroe County population: 45,050 2 Cost per Monroe County resident: $1, How We Got Here $9.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Monroe County contributed to at least: 10 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Monroe County 26% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
96 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
97 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Oconto County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Oconto County What We Pay For 1 $66.1 million $7.3 million Healthcare $66.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $27.8 million Taxpayers $66.1 million $47.7 million Lost Productivity $24.4 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $11.1 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Oconto County population: 37,468 2 Cost per Oconto County resident: $1, How We Got Here $10.8 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Oconto County contributed to at least: 15 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Oconto County Binge Drinking Rates 7 33% Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 WI 23% US 16%
98 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
99 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Oneida County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Oneida County What We Pay For 1 $38.2 million $4.2 million Healthcare $38.2 MILLION We All Pay 1 $16.1 million Taxpayers $38.2 million $27.6 million Lost Productivity $15.9 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $6.4 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Oneida County population: 35,801 2 Cost per Oneida County resident: $1, How We Got Here $6.2 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Oneida County contributed to at least: 10 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Oneida County 19% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
100 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
101 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Outagamie County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Outagamie County $272.2 MILLION What We Pay For 1 $272.2 million $29.9 million Healthcare We All Pay 1 $272.2 million $114.6 million Taxpayers $196.4 million Lost Productivity $113.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $45.8 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Outagamie County population: 177,913 2 Cost per Outagamie County resident: $1, How We Got Here $44.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Outagamie County contributed to at least: 34 alcohol-related deaths 3 1,364 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 1,980 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Outagamie Binge Drinking Rates County 7 30% WI 23% US 16%
102 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
103 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Ozaukee County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Ozaukee County What We Pay For 1 $77.2 million $8.5 million Healthcare $77.2 MILLION We All Pay 1 $32.5 million Taxpayers $77.2 million $55.7 million Lost Productivity $32.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $13.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Ozaukee County population: 86,568 2 Cost per Ozaukee County resident: $ How We Got Here $12.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Ozaukee County contributed to at least: 15 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Ozaukee County 17% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
104 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
105 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Pepin County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Pepin County What We Pay For 1 $7.5 million $0.8 million Healthcare $7.5 MILLION We All Pay 1 $3.1 million Taxpayers $7.5 million $5.4 million Lost Productivity $3.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $1.3 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Pepin County population: 7,412 2 Cost per Pepin County resident: $ How We Got Here $1.2 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Pepin County contributed to at least: 1 alcohol-related death 3 35 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 28 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Pepin County 19% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
106 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
107 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Pierce County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Pierce County What We Pay For 1 $67.8 million $7.5 million Healthcare $67.8 MILLION We All Pay 1 $28.5 million Taxpayers $67.8 million $48.9 million Lost Productivity $28.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $11.4 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Pierce County population: 40,862 2 Cost per Pierce County resident: $1, How We Got Here $11.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Pierce County contributed to at least: 13 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Pierce County 31% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
108 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
109 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Polk County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Polk County What We Pay For 1 $60.2 million $6.6 million Healthcare $60.2 MILLION We All Pay 1 $25.3 million Taxpayers $60.2 million $43.4 million Lost Productivity $25.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $10.1 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Polk County population: 44,040 2 Cost per Polk County resident: $1, How We Got Here $9.8 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Polk County contributed to at least: 13 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Polk County 26% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
110 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
111 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Portage County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Portage County What We Pay For 1 $76 million $8.4 million Healthcare $76 MILLION We All Pay 1 $32.0 million Taxpayers $76 million $54.9 million Lost Productivity $31.5 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $12.8 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Portage County population: 70,084 2 Cost per Portage County resident: $1, How We Got Here $12.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Portage County contributed to at least: 20 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Portage County 20% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
112 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
113 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Price County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Price County What We Pay For 1 $16.5 million $1.8 million Healthcare $16.5 MILLION We All Pay 1 $6.9 million Taxpayers $16.5 million $11.9 million Lost Productivity $6.9 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $2.8 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Price County population: 13,994 2 Cost per Price County resident: $1, How We Got Here $2.7 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Price County contributed to at least: 3 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Price County 21% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
114 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
115 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Racine County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Racine County What We Pay For 1 $251.5 million $27.6 million Healthcare $251.5 MILLION We All Pay 1 $251.5 million $105.9 million Taxpayers $181.5 million Lost Productivity $104.4 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $42.4 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Racine County population: 195,388 2 Cost per Racine County resident: $1, How We Got Here $41.0 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Racine County contributed to at least: 49 alcohol-related deaths 3 1,926 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 1,002 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Racine County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
116 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
117 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Richland County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Richland County What We Pay For 1 $16.1 million $1.8 million Healthcare $16.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $6.8 million Taxpayers $16.1 million $11.6 million Lost Productivity $6.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $2.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Richland County population: 17,983 2 Cost per Richland County resident: $ How We Got Here $2.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Richland County contributed to at least: 4 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Richland County 17% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
118 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
119 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Rock County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Rock County What We Pay For 1 $198.1 million $21.8 million Healthcare $198.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $83.4 million Taxpayers $198.1 million $143.0 million Lost Productivity $82.2 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $33.4 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Rock County population: 160,092 2 Cost per Rock County resident: $1, How We Got Here $32.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Rock County contributed to at least: 45 alcohol-related deaths 3 1,310 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 1,675 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Rock County 24% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
120 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
121 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Rusk County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Rusk County What We Pay For 1 $12.6 million $1.4 million Healthcare $12.6 MILLION We All Pay 1 $5.3 million Taxpayers $1.6 million $9.1 million Lost Productivity $5.2 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $2.1 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Rusk County population: 14,621 2 Cost per Rusk County resident: $ How We Got Here $2.1 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Rusk County contributed to at least: 3 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 94 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Rusk County 16% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
122 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
123 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Saint Croix County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Saint Croix County What We Pay For 1 $105.2 million $11.6 million Healthcare $105.2 MILLION We All Pay 1 $44.3 million Taxpayers $105.2 million $76.0 million Lost Productivity $43.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $17.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Saint Croix County population: 84,922 2 Cost per Saint Croix County resident: $1, How We Got Here $17.2 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Saint Croix County contributed to at least: 11 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Saint Croix County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
124 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
125 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Sauk County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Sauk County What We Pay For 1 $71 million $7.8 million Healthcare $71 MILLION We All Pay 1 $29.9 million Taxpayers $71 million $51.3 million Lost Productivity $29.5 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $12.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Sauk County population: 62,290 2 Cost per Sauk County resident: $1, How We Got Here $11.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Sauk County contributed to at least: 18 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Sauk County 22% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
126 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
127 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Sawyer County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Sawyer County What We Pay For 1 $22.4 million $2.5 million Healthcare $22.4 MILLION We All Pay 1 $9.4 million Taxpayers $22.4 million $16.2 million Lost Productivity $9.3 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $3.8 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Sawyer County population: 16,596 2 Cost per Sawyer County resident: $1, How We Got Here $3.7 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Sawyer County contributed to at least: 7 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Sawyer County 25% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
128 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
129 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Shawano County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Shawano County What We Pay For 1 $46.7 million $5.1 million Healthcare $46.7 MILLION We All Pay 1 $19.7 million Taxpayers $46.7 million $33.7 million Lost Productivity $19.4 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $7.9 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Shawano County population: 41,754 2 Cost per Shawano County resident: $1, How We Got Here $7.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Shawano County contributed to at least: 11 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Shawano County 21% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
130 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
131 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Sheboygan County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Sheboygan County What We Pay For 1 $192.8 million $21.2 million Healthcare $192.8 MILLION We All Pay 1 $81.2 million Taxpayers $192.8 million $139.2 million Lost Productivity $80.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $32.5 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Sheboygan County population: 115,149 2 Cost per Sheboygan County resident: $1, How We Got Here $31.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Sheboygan County contributed to at least: 27 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Sheboygan County Binge Drinking Rates 7 32% Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 WI 23% US 16%
132 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
133 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Taylor County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Taylor County What We Pay For 1 $29.9 million $3.3 million Healthcare $29.9 MILLION We All Pay 1 $12.6 million Taxpayers $29.9 million $21.6 million Lost Productivity $12.4 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $5.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Taylor County population: 20,661 2 Cost per Taylor County resident: $1, How We Got Here $4.9 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Taylor County contributed to at least: 5 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Taylor County 28% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
134 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
135 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Trempealeau County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Trempealeau County $38.8 MILLION What We Pay For 1 $38.8 million $4.3 million Healthcare We All Pay 1 $16.4 million Taxpayers $38.8 million $28.0 million Lost Productivity $16.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $6.5 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Trempealeau County population: 29,001 2 Cost per Trempealeau County resident: $1, How We Got Here $6.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Trempealeau County contributed to at least: 7 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Trempealeau County 26% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
136 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
137 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Vernon County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Vernon County What We Pay For 1 $42 million $4.6 million Healthcare $42 MILLION We All Pay 1 $17.7 million Taxpayers $42 million $30.3 million Lost Productivity $17.4 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $7.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Vernon County population: 29,954 2 Cost per Vernon County resident: $1, How We Got Here $6.9 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Vernon County contributed to at least: 8 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Vernon County 28% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
138 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
139 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Vilas County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Vilas County What We Pay For 1 $18.1 million $2.0 million Healthcare $18.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $7.6 million Taxpayers $18.1 million $13.1 million Lost Productivity $7.5 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $3.1 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Vilas County population: 21,442 2 Cost per Vilas County resident: $ How We Got Here $3.0 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Vilas County contributed to at least: 8 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Vilas County 15% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
140 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
141 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Walworth County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Walworth County What We Pay For 1 $112.9 million $12.4 million Healthcare $112.9 MILLION We All Pay 1 $47.5 million Taxpayers $112.9 million $81.5 million Lost Productivity $46.8 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $19.0 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Walworth County population: 102,931 2 Cost per Walworth County resident: $1, How We Got Here $18.4 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Walworth County contributed to at least: 26 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 2,096 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Walworth County 21% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
142 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
143 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Washburn County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Washburn County What We Pay For 1 $13.9 million $1.5 million Healthcare $13.9 MILLION We All Pay 1 $5.9 million Taxpayers $13.9 million $10.0 million Lost Productivity $5.8 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $2.3 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Washburn County population: 15,912 2 Cost per Washburn County resident: $ How We Got Here $2.3 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Washburn County contributed to at least: 4 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Binge Drinking Rates 7 Washburn County 16% WI 23% US 16%
144 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
145 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Washington County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Washington County $157.2 MILLION What We Pay For 1 $157.2 million $17.3 million Healthcare We All Pay 1 $66.2 million Taxpayers $157.2 million $113.5 million Lost Productivity $65.2 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $26.5 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Washington County population: 132,386 2 Cost per Washington County resident: $1, How We Got Here $25.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Washington County contributed to at least: 34 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 1,235 alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Washington County 23% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
146 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
147 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Waukesha County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Waukesha County What We Pay For 1 $366.1 million $40.2 million Healthcare $366.1 MILLION We All Pay 1 $366.1 million $154.1 million Taxpayers $264.2 million Lost Productivity $151.9 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $61.7 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Waukesha County population: 390,730 2 Cost per Waukesha County resident: $ How We Got Here $59.7 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Waukesha County contributed to at least: 86 alcohol-related deaths 3 3,069 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 2,349 alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Waukesha County 18% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
148 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
149 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Waupaca County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Waupaca County What We Pay For 1 $66.8 million $7.3 million Healthcare $66.8 MILLION We All Pay 1 $28.1 million Taxpayers $66.8 million $48.2 million Lost Productivity $27.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $11.3 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Waupaca County population: 52,682 2 Cost per Waupaca County resident: $1, How We Got Here $10.9 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Waupaca County contributed to at least: 16 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Waupaca County 24% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
150 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
151 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Waushara County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Waushara County What We Pay For 1 $28.2 million $3.1 million Healthcare $28.2 MILLION We All Pay 1 $11.9 million Taxpayers $28.2 million $20.4 million Lost Productivity $11.7 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $4.8 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Waushara County population: 24,576 2 Cost per Waushara County resident: $1, How We Got Here $4.6 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Waushara County contributed to at least: 6 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Waushara County 21% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
152 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
153 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Winnebago County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Winnebago County $214.8 MILLION What We Pay For 1 $214.8 million $23.6 million Healthcare We All Pay 1 $90.4 million Taxpayers $214.8 million $155.0 million Lost Productivity $89.1 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $36.2 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Winnebago County population: 167,699 2 Cost per Winnebago County resident: $1, How We Got Here $35.0 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Winnebago County contributed to at least: 43 alcohol-related deaths 3 1,581 alcohol-related hospitalizations 4 3,173 alcohol-related arrests 5 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Winnebago County 24% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
154 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
155 The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wood County Annual economic cost of excessive alcohol use in Wood County What We Pay For 1 $7.3 million $0.8 million Healthcare $7.3 MILLION We All Pay 1 $3.1 million Taxpayers $7.3 million $5.2 million Lost Productivity $3.0 million Excessive Drinkers and their Families $1.2 million Other Other includes costs associated with the criminal justice system, motor vehicle crashes, and other consequences. Consequences of Excessive Alcohol Use Wood County population: 7,108 2 Cost per Wood County resident: $1, How We Got Here $1.2 million Others in Society Others in Society includes private health insurers, employers, crime victims, and others. In 2011, excessive alcohol consumption in Wood County contributed to at least: 15 alcohol-related deaths alcohol-related hospitalizations alcohol-related arrests 5 Excessive alcohol consumption includes: - binge drinking (5+ drinks/occasion for men; 4+ drinks/occasion for women) - heavy drinking (average >2 drinks/day for men, average >1 drink/day for women) - any alcohol consumption by youth under age 21 - any alcohol consumption by pregnant women. 6 For more details, please refer to the full report, available online at Binge drinking is responsible for 76% of the economic cost of excessive alcohol consumption. 1 Wood County 19% Binge Drinking Rates 7 WI 23% US 16%
156 Suggested Citation Black PD, Paltzer JT. The Burden of Excessive Alcohol Use in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, March References and Notes 1 Wisconsin total and categorical economic estimates were derived from the national estimate established in Bouchery, E.E., Henrick, J.H., Sacks, J.J., Simon, C.J., Brewer, R.D. (2011). Economic Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in the U.S., American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5): U.S. Census Bureau: American Fact Finder population estimates. 3 Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin resident death certificates. Annual average numbers Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin hospital inpatient discharge database Wisconsin Statistical Analysis Center, Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Arrests in Wisconsin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Binge Drinking Prevalence, Frequency, and Intensity Among Adults United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 61(1):14-19, Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking rates from were used for county analysis due to small sample sizes and available weights (county-specific weights were not available for data). Binge drinking rates from were used for state analysis to be consistent with county analyses. For questions regarding this report, please contact Penny Black at [email protected] For questions regarding what to do with this report, please contact Paul Krupski at [email protected] Funding for this project was provided by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program. 2013
Group Health Cooperative of South Central WI Unity Health Plans Ins. Corp.
County Adams Ashland Barron Bayfield Brown Buffalo Burnett Calumet Chippewa Clark Columbia Crawford Dane Individual Marketplace Plans Physicians Plus Ins. Corp. Dodge Door Douglas Dunn Eau Claire Florence
Wisconsin Epidemiological Profile on Alcohol and Other Drug Use, 2012
Wisconsin Epidemiological Profile on Alcohol and Other Drug Use, 2012 Wisconsin Department of Health Services Prepared by the Office of Health Informatics,, Division of Public Health, in consultation with
2013 Rankings Wisconsin
2013 Rankings Wisconsin Introduction Where we live matters to our health. The health of a community depends on many different factors, including the environment, education and jobs, access to and quality
Domestic Abuse Incident Report (DAIR) For the period of January 1, 2012 December 31, 2012
Domestic Abuse Incident Report (DAIR) For the period of January 1, 2012 December 31, 2012 Wisconsin Department of Justice Office of Crime Victim Services Released May 2014 2012 Domestic Abuse Incident
Building Community Capacity through Broadband (BCCB) Initiative. Frequently Asked Questions
Building Community Capacity through Broadband (BCCB) Initiative Frequently Asked Questions Why is broadband important? Fast, reliable Internet service is essential infrastructure for economic and community
Home Buyer Counseling Services
Adams County Catholic Charities Diocese of La Crosse 608-782-0710 888-212-HELP [email protected] www.cclse.org 3710 East Ave S La Crosse Reverse Mortgage/HECM Landlord counseling Central Wisc Community
Wisconsin's Hmong Population
Wisconsin's Hmong Population Census 2000 Population and Other DemographicTrends... Prepared for: University of Wisconsin Extension Hmong Educational Needs Assessment I Prepared by: University of Wisconsin
Wisconsin Epidemiological Profile on Alcohol and Other Drug Use, 2014
Wisconsin Epidemiological Profile on Alcohol and Other Drug Use, 2014 Wisconsin Department of Health Services Prepared by the Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, the University of Wisconsin
Progress in Reducing Premature Deaths in Wisconsin Counties, 2000-2010
PUBLIC HEALTH BRIEF REPORT Progress in Reducing Premature Deaths in Wisconsin Counties, 2000-2010 Thomas Nonnweiler; Elizabeth A. Pollock, BS; Barbara Rudolph, PhD, MSSW; Patrick L. Remington, MD, MPH
2016 County Health Rankings. Wisconsin
2016 County Health Rankings Wisconsin INTRODUCTION The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps program brings actionable data and strategies to communities to make it easier for people to be healthy in their
Fire Department Dues. Informational Paper 93
Fire Department Dues Informational Paper 93 Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau January, 2015 Fire Department Dues Program Prepared by Kendra Bonderud Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main,
DIRECTORY OF SELF-HELP LEGAL RESOURCES IN WISCONSIN COUNTIES
DIRECTORY OF SELF-HELP LEGAL RESOURCES IN WISCONSIN COUNTIES MAY 2015 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Office of Court Operations Introduction This directory of local county legal resources provides information
AT A GLANCE Economic and Social Impact of Broadband Investments in Wisconsin
1 AT A GLANCE Economic and Social Impact of Broadband Investments in Wisconsin Unmet Demand Very High/High Medium Low/Very Low Situation 35 counties 16 counties 21 counties Impact Annual Construction and
Substance Abuse and Treatment Needs of Pregnant Women in Wisconsin
Substance Abuse and Treatment Needs of Pregnant Women in Wisconsin Executive Summary and Implications Each year in Wisconsin there are about 68,000 live births, 15,000 induced abortions, 1,000 fetal and
Property Tax Deferral Loan Program
Informational Paper 26 Property Tax Deferral Loan Program Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau January, 2009 Property Tax Deferral Loan Program Prepared by Paul Ferguson Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau
Wisconsin Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program Blood Lead Testing and Lead Exposure Data
Wisconsin Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program Blood Lead Testing and Lead Exposure Data The burden of childhood lead exposure in Wisconsin changed dramatically in 2012 when the Centers f Disease
Customer Guide. Medicare Advantage HMO. great reasons. Three. to choose a Medicare Advantage plan
Three great reasons to choose a Medicare Advantage plan 2016 Medicare Advantage HMO Customer Guide Security Health Plan Medicare Advantage HMO Plans Advocare Spirit (HMO-POS) Advocare Spirit Rx (HMO-POS)
Local Government Revenue Options
Local Government Revenue Options Informational Paper 15 Wisconsin Legislative Fsical Bureau January, 2013 Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau January, 2013 Local Government Revenue Options Prepared by
Health Insurance Coverage
2010 Wisconsin Health Insurance Coverage Wisconsin Department of Health Services Division of Public Health Office of Health Informatics Page Intentionally Left Blank Wisconsin Health Insurance Coverage
Wisconsin Medicaid provides directory of used medical equipment donation sites
January 2003 No. 2003-03 PHC 1931 To: All Providers HMOs and Other Managed Care Programs Wisconsin Medicaid provides directory of used medical equipment donation sites Wisconsin Medicaid is providing a
Emergency Management
Report 10-9 May 2010 A Review Emergency Management Department of Military Affairs Office of Justice Assistance 2009-2010 Joint Legislative Audit Committee Members Senate Members: Kathleen Vinehout, Co-chairperson
Alternatives to Incarceration in the State of Wisconsin
Alternatives to Incarceration in the State of Wisconsin Lynsey R. Johnson Faculty Sponsor: Kara Lindaman Department of Political Science and Public Administration ABSTRACT Alternatives to incarceration
Member Directory. Supporting Families. Together Association
Member Directory 2012 Supporting Families Together Association Supporting Families Together Association Families Supporting Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies Community-based Child Care Resource
IT S YOUR CHOICE. Decision Guide. Local Deductible Plan Insurance for Employees and Retirees ET-2158 (10/16/2015) PO4, PO14
IT S YOUR CHOICE 2016 Decision Guide Local Deductible Plan Insurance for Employees and Retirees ET-2158 (10/16/2015) PO4, PO14 KNOW YOUR BENEFIT ENROLLMENT POINTS There are certain times throughout the
Substance Abuse Treatment Needs, Capacity and Costs
1 W. Wilson St. P.O. Box 7851 Madison, WI 53707 608-267-7792 Bureau of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Substance Abuse Treatment Needs, Capacity and Costs 2004 Update Division of Disability
WTCS College Boundaries & Campus Locations
WTCS College Boundaries & Campus Locations Official WTCS District Boundary Descriptions (per WTCS State Board Policy 204) Blackhawk Technical College District Green County less the portion of the School
Clinic by County Address/Phone Website Clinic Hours Limitations For Patient Eligibility Ashland Northlakes - Ashland Community Dental Clinic
*Note this is not a complete list. It was updated in the summer of 2015 and is a reflection of the information the WDA was able to gather from each individual dental clinic. Some clinics may have changed
Wisconsin Diabetes Surveillance Report 2012
Wisconsin Diabetes Surveillance Report 212 Self-reported general health Risk of complications Increasing prevalence Risk factors TRENDS Pre-diabetes PREVENTION Access to care Self-management Hospitalization
Mental Health and Substance Abuse
Wisconsin Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs Assessment STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services P-00613 (02/2014) Introduction Two Federal
Wisconsin Self-Directed Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Waiver Program under the 1915(c) Authority in the Social Security Act
Wisconsin Self-Directed Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Waiver Program under the 1915(c) Authority in the Social Security Act IRIS Consultant Agency (ICA) Provider Certification Criteria Division
Prepared by Fredrik O. Andersson Grace L. Chikoto Shelly M. Schnupp
NonproFIt WISCoNSIN In Brief Size & Scope Prepared by Fredrik O. Andersson Grace L. Chikoto Shelly M. Schnupp Commissioned by the Wisconsin Nonprofits Association and Forward Community Investments with
Crime Victim and Witness Services. Informational Paper 60
Crime Victim and Witness Services Informational Paper 60 Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau January, 2015 Crime Victim and Witness Services Prepared by Michael Steinschneider Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal
Section 11 Payer Fact Sheets
Table of Contents Payer Fact Sheets... 2 Anthem Blue Crosse and Blue Shield of Wisconsin... 3 Arise Health Plan... 6 Care Wisconsin Health Plan, Inc.... 9 Children's Community Health Plan... 12 Community
Prevention Status Report 2013
The Prevention Status Reports (PSRs) highlight for all 50 states and the District of Columbia the status of public health policies and practices designed to prevent or reduce important health problems.
Property Tax Deferral Loan Program
Property Tax Deferral Loan Program Informational Paper 23 Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau January, 2013 Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau January, 2013 Property Tax Deferral Loan Program Prepared
Wisconsin Fast Forward - Blueprint for Prosperity Initiative High School Pupil Award Summary
Wisconsin Fast Forward - Blueprint for Prosperity Initiative High School Pupil Award Summary Executive Summary 2013 Special Session AB 2, referred to as the "Blueprint for Prosperity" initiative, was signed
Appleton 5089 PRIVATE 712 Outagamie County 712 LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY 712 PROPRIETARY 130 Outagamie County 130 GILL- TECH ACADEMY OF HAIR DESIGN 76
Wisconsin City / County / School # of Stafford Loan recipients Appleton 5089 PRIVATE 712 Outagamie County 712 LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY 712 PROPRIETARY 130 Outagamie County 130 GILL- TECH ACADEMY OF HAIR DESIGN
REHABILITATION TREATMENT NEEDS FOR INMATES OF COUNTY JAILS
REHABILITATION TREATMENT NEEDS FOR INMATES OF COUNTY JAILS By Tiana L. Potter Research Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science Degree With a Major in Vocational
The High Cost of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in New Hampshire. Executive Summary. PolEcon Research December 2012
The High Cost of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in New Hampshire Executive Summary PolEcon Research December 2012 New Futures Introduction Excessive alcohol consumption is the third-leading preventable
Macomb County Office of Substance Abuse MCOSA. Executive Summary
Macomb County Office of Substance Abuse MCOSA Executive Summary This report marks the second data profile of alcohol and illicit drugs burden in Macomb County. The first report produced in 2007 detailed
STATEWIDE ASBESTOS REMOVAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SIGNATORY EMPLOYERS AND THE WISCONSIN LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL AND ITS AFFILIATES
STATEWIDE ASBESTOS REMOVAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SIGNATORY EMPLOYERS AND THE WISCONSIN LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL AND ITS AFFILIATES EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2015 TO May 31, 2016 INDEX ARTICLE I DURATION OF AGREEMENT
Approved Wisconsin Nurse Aide Training Programs - Alphabetical by County and City
County: ASHLAND WISCONSIN INDIANHEAD TECHNICAL COLLEGE - ASHLAND 505 PINE RIDGE DR SHELL LAKE, WI 54871- KATHY KITTER-CAREY $420.00 (715) 468-2815 Open to the Public? YES 68% www.witc.edu County: BROWN
PROGRAM GUIDELINES For Master of Social Work (MSW) Child Welfare Education & Advancement Program
PROGRAM GUIDELINES For Master of Social Work (MSW) Child Welfare Education & Advancement Program The Child Welfare Education & Advancement Program (CWEAP) is a partnership between the Wisconsin Division
Strategic Guidance, 2014-2019 Shooting Ranges in Wisconsin
Strategic Guidance, 2014-2019 Shooting Ranges in Wisconsin Introduction. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has a long history of promoting safe and accessible shooting opportunities for
Wisconsin s Managed Forest Law A Program Summary PUB-FR-295 (Rev. December 2015)
Wisconsin s Managed Forest Law A Program Summary PUB-FR-295 (Rev. December 2015) This brief summary features the principle rules and obligations of the Managed Forest Law (MFL). Periodically, the Legislature
Wisconsin Free Tax Assistance Sites
Wisconsin Free Tax Assistance Sites ADAMS BARRON BAYFIELD BROWN BURNETT CALUMET CHIPPEWA COLUMBIA DANE DODGE DOOR DOUGLAS EAU CLAIRE FOND DU LAC GRANT GREEN IOWA JACKSON JEFFERSON JUNEAU KENOSHA LACROSSE
A conversation with CDC s Alcohol Program, September 5, 2014
A conversation with CDC s Alcohol Program, September 5, 2014 Participants Robert Brewer, MD, MSPH Epidemiologist; Lead, Excessive Alcohol Use Prevention Team (Alcohol Program), Division of Population Health
Intoxicated Driver Program Directory. To: State, County, and Local Officials Involved with the Intoxicated Driver Program
To: State, County, and Local Officials Involved with the Intoxicated Driver Program This directory has been updated in response to requests from county staff working with the Intoxicated Driver Program
The Corrosive Effects of Alcohol and Drug Misuse on NH s Workforce and Economy SUMMARY REPORT. Prepared by:
The Corrosive Effects of Alcohol and Drug Misuse on NH s Workforce and Economy SUMMARY REPORT Prepared by: November 2014 The Corrosive Effects of Alcohol and Drug Misuse on NH s Workforce and Economy New
Colorado Substance Use and Recommendations Regarding Marijuana Tax Revenue
Colorado Substance Use and Recommendations Regarding Marijuana Tax Revenue Substance addiction and abuse is Colorado s most prevalent, complex, costly and untreated public health challenge. It is an issue
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DPI-NR 2015-103 Tuesday, October 27, 2015 Contact: Tom McCarthy, DPI Communications Officer, (608) 266-3559
News Release Education Information Services 125 South Webster Street P.O. Box 7841 Madison, WI 53707-7841 (608) 266-3559 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DPI-NR 2015-103 Tuesday, October 27, 2015 Contact: Tom McCarthy,
2015 Summary of Benefits
2015 Summary of Benefits Value (HMO-POS) Essentials Rx (HMO-POS) (H4270) January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015 Western Wisconsin (26 Counties) H4270_082914_1 CMS Accepted (09032014) SECTION I INTRODUCTION
Wisconsin Coordinated Community Response (CCR), Sexual Assault Response Team (SART), and Elder Abuse Interdisciplinary Team (I-Team) Directory
Adams County CCR Primary Contact: Tania Bonnett, Chair District Attorney 608-339-4217 [email protected], Child Maltreatment, Elders, Disabilities Ashland County Sexual Assault Response Team Primary
THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL EXCISE TAX INCREASES ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY IN TEXAS
THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL EXCISE TAX INCREASES ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY IN TEXAS Megan C. Diaz, MA Frank J. Chaloupka, PhD David H. Jernigan, PhD Report prepared for March 2, 2015 Table of Contents Executive
Page 1 of 8 AGENCIES/PROGRAMS DESCRIPTION SERVICE AREA CONTACT PERSON CONTACT INFO
GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH : OUTPATIENT SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT UNITY HOUSE CHANGES (ADOLESCENT TREATMENT) PERINATAL TREATMENT GUNDERSEN LUTHERA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SPARTA OFFICE SUPPORT GROUPS
Alcohol Facts and Statistics
Alcohol Facts and Statistics Alcohol Use in the United States:» Prevalence of Drinking: In 2014, 87.6 percent of people ages 18 or older reported that they drank alcohol at some point in their lifetime;
Lic # Provider # Fac# Vendor # Facility. Administrator Sub. Administrator. Phone Fax. Region. Participation Date. Counties Served : Counties Served :
501 PCA501 43109000 ADAMS CTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 108 E NORTH ST FRIENDSHIP, WI 53934 ADAMS DANE MARQUETTE RICHLAND WOOD 285 PCA285 PREFERRED HOME HEALTH SOLUTIONS 974 FERN AVE GRAND MARSH, WI 53936
Wisconsin Health Trends: 2011 Progress Report
Making Wisconsin the Healthiest State Project Wisconsin Health Trends: 211 Progress Report July 21 School of Medicine and Public Health UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON University of Wisconsin Population
The Economic Benefits of Risk Factor Reduction in Canada
The Economic Benefits of Risk Factor Reduction in Canada Tobacco Smoking, Excess Weight, Physical Inactivity and Alcohol Use Public Health 2015 May 26, 2015 Risk Factors in High-Income North America Ranked
9. Substance Abuse. pg 166-169: Self-reported alcohol consumption. pg 170-171: Childhood experience of living with someone who used drugs
9. pg 166-169: Self-reported alcohol consumption pg 170-171: Childhood experience of living with someone who used drugs pg 172-173: Hospitalizations related to alcohol and substance abuse pg 174-179: Accidental
Alcohol Facts and Statistics
Alcohol Facts and Statistics Alcohol Use in the United States: Prevalence of Drinking: In 2012, 87.6 percent of people ages 18 or older reported that they drank alcohol at some point in their lifetime;
SMOKING TOBACCO: SMOKING
TOBACCO: SMOKING One in 4 adults in Guam is a smoker. Among youth, 1 in 5 smokes. Guam s smoking rate is higher than most US States and Territories; this has remained unchanged since 2001. T O B A C C
