How To Get Blood Test Records From A Blood Alcohol Test



Similar documents
NC SBI QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Deputy District Attorney Tammy Spurgeon Orange County District Attorney Office

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 27

Nancy W. Peterson Forensic Biology Consultants, LLC July 7, 2011

SWGDE Minimum Requirements for Quality Assurance in the Processing of Digital and Multimedia Evidence

THE IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY THE ALLEGED CONDUCT OF CHEMIST ANNIE DOOKHAN AT THE HINTON DRUG LABORATORY

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Procedure for the Use of Forensic Advantage (FA)

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS NEEDED TO PRODUCE QUALITY DATA

Lab Service, Asset Management and Extending the Life of Your Lab Equipment. Scott Greenwood Director, Services

M E M O R A N D U M. Austin Police Department Field Support Services Forensic Science Division

Data Quality. Tips for getting it, keeping it, proving it! Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program

ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLASS SPECIFICATION FORENSIC SCIENTIST SERIES

Understanding quantitative blood alcohol testing in drunk driving cases.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION. v. Case No : ,03,05/08-CR-W-SOW

Request for Quotes Goods/Trade Services RFQ for Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer (GCMS) (PCS# RFQ)

GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC LABORATORY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INTRODUCTION

Analytical Data Package Reports

FAVORABLE DWI RESULTS 2009

Potentially Exculpatory Evidence in Protected/Private/Controlled Record CITY v. DEFENDANT, JUSTICE COURT Case No

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PEOPLE'S VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE FORM THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )

STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINES: EVIDENTIAL BREATH ALCOHOL INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) This special action came on regularly for conference on

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI., ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. v. ) ), ) Defendant. )

Procedure for Reporting Results. 2.0 Scope This procedure applies to all employees who issue Laboratory Reports.

THE FIFTH ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL REGION OF TEXAS

REPORT BY THE CRIMINAL COURTS COMMITTEE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE OPERATIONS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDING THE ADOPTION OF A BRADY CHECKLIST

Topic: Generic GC Cross (Isothermal Static Headspace Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector)

Technical Procedure for Integrated Ballistics Identification System (IBIS)

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney

ATTORNEY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT (LONG)

Curriculum Vitae. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science Major: Zoology; Minor Chemistry (1980) South Dakota State University Brookings, SD

ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLASS SPECIFICATION STATE POLICE EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN SERIES

Technical Report. Automatic Identification and Semi-quantitative Analysis of Psychotropic Drugs in Serum Using GC/MS Forensic Toxicological Database

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense)

STATE OF NEW YORK : : ALLEGANY COUNTY DRUG COUNTY OF ALLEGANY : : TREATMENT COURT. Defendant.

Increasing Quality While Maintaining Efficiency in Drug Chemistry with DART-TOF MS Screening

STATE OF ARIZONA ex rel. WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner/Appellee,

NIST HANDBOOK CHECKLIST CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING

Lawrence Police Department Administrative Policy. August 2013

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT

Medical Cannabis Laboratory Approval Program

ALACC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

R221 - Specific Requirements: Forensic

A Navigation through the Tracefinder Software Structure and Workflow Options. Frans Schoutsen Pesticide Symposium Prague 27 April 2015

Table 2-1: Elements of the Project Management Plan

INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF IOLA, KANSAS. CITY OF IOLA, KANSAS, ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) 10 ), ) Defendant. DIVERSION AGREEMENT

Criminal Warrant Process Audit August Patrice Randle, City Auditor Craig Terrell, Assistant City Auditor Lee Hagelstein, Internal Auditor

No. 100,992 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, RAUL J. AGUILAR, JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

1. PURPOSE To provide a written procedure for laboratory proficiency testing requirements and reporting.

5 Discovery, Defenses, and Pretrial Motions

TANZANIA BUREAU OF STANDARDS EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES

DRUG COURT DEFERRED JUDGMENT INFORMATION SHEET

United States Attorney s Office for the District of Oregon. Criminal Discovery Policy

BARTON COUNTY DUI DIVERSION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Volume 22 Number 22. C43-A ISBN ISSN Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Confirmation of Drugs; Approved Guideline

HOUSE BILL 2485 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 12, CHAPTER 13, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE 10; RELATING TO HEALTH AND SAFETY AUDIT PRIVILEGE.

Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)

WEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List

Electronic Records Management Guidelines

COUNT I. Charge: <Charge Name> Minnesota Statute: <Statutes_Charge> Maximum Sentence: <Max Sentence Description> COUNT II COUNT III

Accurate Mass Screening Workflows for the Analysis of Novel Psychoactive Substances

POLICY TITLE: Employee Drug and Alcohol Testing POLICY NO: PAGE 1 of 7

State Meat and Poultry Inspection (MPI) Program Laboratory Quality Management System Checklist

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 48 1

1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan

Pesticide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney

OVI Essentials. Reference Manual Volume No. 15-W049

PRETRIAL DUI DIVERSION INFORMATION SHEET

How To Manage Cloud Data Safely

Procedure for Equipment Calibration and Maintenance

Michael Gayoso, Jr. Office of the County Attorney TH

ELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) in EMRL

District Court of Maryland

E- Discovery in Criminal Law

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION PLAINTIFF S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

CURRICULUM VITAE Blaine M. Kern

York County DUI Prevention Initiative

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. DISTRICT OF NEVADA NO. 2:13-cv APG-PAL SPECIAL MASTER DANIEL B. GARRIE E-DISCOVERY SUMMARY AND ORDER

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION AUDIT PROGRAM

Rules and Procedures. Rule 312 August 23, Rule CRIME LABORATORY - EVIDENCE AND CRIME SCENES

The Facts on Equine Drug Testing

Pierce County. Drug Court. Established September 2004

Transcription:

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NO. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER ON COPYING AND PRODUCTION OF BLOOD TESTING RECORDS THE COURT ORDERS the District Attorney s Office and its agent, the forensic laboratory that analyzed the Defendant s blood in this case, specifically,, are to digitally copy and digitally produce the below documentation to the Defendant s attorney as directed below: The Following Items Concern General Matters: 1. A copy of any accreditation certificates for the laboratory that were in effect at the time of the analysis and a copy of the lab s last complete inspection and final accreditation audit. 2. A copy of any internal, external, annual or reaccreditation, reviews, or reports since the time of the lab s last complete accreditation audit and any internal, external, annual, or reaccreditation audits since the time of the test in this case. 3. A copy of all documents, not otherwise included above, reflecting the failure of the laboratory to comply, at any point, with any essential, important, or desirable criteria for accreditation or reaccreditation and all documents evidencing subsequent satisfaction of any essential, important, or desirable criteria for accreditation or reaccreditation. 4. The laboratory s standard or general policies, protocol, and procedures concerning testing, quality control, quality assurance, calibration, ACHIEVEMENT OF THE CALIBRATION CURVE, and administrative or technical review. 5. The laboratory s policies, protocols and procedures as to testing, quality control, quality assurance, calibration, ACHIEVEMENT OF THE CALIBRATION CURVE, and administrative or technical review of all samples, solutions and equipment used in or related to the testing of the sample, solutions, and equipment used in this case. 1

6. The laboratory s policies, protocols, and procedures concerning the sample selection criteria used in this particular case. 7. The testimonial evaluation forms on each laboratory employee. The Following Items Concern Pre-analytical Matters: 8. Validation studies (both internal and external) that prove the validation of the method, equipment, and instructions used. 9. The identification and source of all internal standards, standard mixtures (separation matrix), verifiers, blanks, and controls that were run within the batch in which the sample in this case was run as well as all certificates relating to the foregoing obtained from outside vendors. 10. All records reflecting internal testing and verification and ongoing quality control testing of all solutions, reagents, or standard mixtures used as, as part of, or in relation to calibrators, internal standards, controls, standard mixtures, or standards in the batch in which the sample in this case was run. 11. All refrigeration logs, reports, or other documents in whatever form, for all refrigerated compartments in which this sample, other unknowns within the run, calibrators, internal standards, controls, standard mixtures, standards, and reagents used in or in relation to the analysis in this case were stored or kept at any time. 12. All proficiency testing results for any person within the chain of custody for the sample in this case, including the person who conducted the testing in this case, for two years prior to the testing of the sample in this case and for any such testing since the testing in this case. This specifically includes the summary report of expected results for the proficiency testing (and the manufacturer s information sheet) against which the proficiency test results are judged. 13. Balance quality control records on any balance instrument used in relation to the calibrators, samples, controls, internal standards, mixtures or other solutions used in relation to the preparation of knowns or unknowns used in the blood alcohol testing of the samples in this case. This includes the records reflecting the calibration of weights on any balance related to the solutions, mixtures, or equipment used in relation to this case as well as any control charts, for two years before and at any time since the testing of the sample in this case. 14. Pipette quality control records on any pipette used in relation to the calibrators, samples, controls, internal standards, mixtures or other solutions or used in relation to the 2

preparation of knowns or unknowns used in the blood alcohol testing of the samples in this case for two years before and at any time since the testing of the sample in this case. 15. The employee training records, curriculum vitae, and resume for any person listed on chain of custody documents in this case or who performed the analysis in this case. 16. Maintenance and repair records (Internal and external) for all equipment used in relation to the testing in this case for two years before the test in this case and since the test in this case. The Following Items Concern Analytical Matters: 17. The identity, make, model, and brand or manufacturer of all equipment (GS, MS, and auto Sampler) and other supporting equipment (i.e. balance, pipette, etc.) used during the analysis and/or preparation of the samples in this case and the variables used in its installation and operation. 18. The source and type of all consumables used in collection, preparation, and analysis of the samples run in the batch. 19. If a Gas or Liquid Chromatograph is used, the reporting of t0 time (time zero) according to the method. 20. The calibration curve and chromatograms related thereto and all chromatograms generated in the batch in which the sample in this case was tested. 21. All logs, spreadsheets, or other documents reflecting the sequence, order and-or analytical results of all calibrators, samples, standards, controls, and blanks in the batch containing the sample in this case. 22. Documentation of all machine parameters, settings, variables, and integration criteria in relation to the batch in which the sample in this case was tested. The Following Items Concern Reporting Matters: 23. The particular records maintained for this testing and calibration event. 24. All documents and bench notes contained within the folder or file for the sample in this case including a copy of any note or notation on the sample folder or file. These documents shall be segregated from all other documents produced. 25. If the lab received more than one vial or container of blood or other substance, records reflecting which vial was tested in this case. 3

26. The full reporting and the underlying validation of the valuation of the uncertainty measurement (UM) in the ultimate reported result. 27. All chain of custody logs or reports in relation to the sample and the case file or folder related to the sample in this case. 28. Any quality action plan and deviation request related to the type of testing, equipment, or personnel involved in this case for two years before the test in this case and since the test in this case. 29. An opportunity for the defense and defense experts to view, visually inspect, diagram and photographically record the GC. MS, and all ancillary equipment used to test the sample in this case as well as the area, and all immediately adjacent and adjoining areas, in which the equipment used in this case are kept, and the sample(s) and kit or packaging in which the sample was received or may be contained. If the defense wants such an inspection, it shall be at a time mutually agreed upon by the parties and the laboratory. 30. If a Mass Spectrometer is used, then the following additional materials should be provided: 30.1 If a spectral library is used to examine spectra and elucidate spectra, the source of the library spectra. 30.2 The hit list and the hit histogram for the testing. 30.3 All tune reports ran within one year if a MS detector was used. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that any evidence within the scope of the items granted above be provided by the State to defendant's attorney s office at,, on or before 5:00 p.m. on the 20 th day after the date of this order, or otherwise by mutual agreement. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that this order is continuing and the State will immediately make available to the Defendant's attorney any subsequent discoverable matter within the scope of the above granted items within 48 hours of the time it learns of or obtains such discoverable matter. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that under the authority of Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83; 83 S.Ct. 1194 (1963), all evidence favorable to the Defendant is to be produced. Additionally, as per the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.09(d), ( Duties of District Attorneys 4

requires that [t]he prosecutor in a criminal case shall: make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense ) evidence that tends to negate guilt or mitigate the offense shall be disclosed. Said evidence is to be produced on or before 5:00 p.m. on the day of its discovery or by agreement. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that any items herein not produced in violation of this order shall be and are excluded from evidence in this case if offered by the State. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that testimony concerning the items not produced in violation of this order, the information contained in those items, and the results obtained from those items shall be and are excluded from evidence in this case if offered by the State. Signed JUDGE PRESIDING 5