Clinical Decision Support Consortium Knowledge Management Overview



Similar documents
Clinical Decision Support Consortium EHR Vendors and Content Vendors

Demonstrating Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements for Eligible Providers Using Certified EMR Technology

Radiology Business Management Association Technology Task Force. Sample Request for Proposal

DEMONSTRATING CLOUD-BASED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT AT SCALE: THE CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT CONSORTIUM

2013 ACO Quality Measures

Psychiatrists and Reporting on Meaningful Use Stage 1. August 6, 2012

An Essential Ingredient for a Successful ACO: The Clinical Knowledge Exchange

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Mar. 31, 2011 (202) Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements Summary.

Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Specialists. NYC REACH Primary Care Information Project NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

CDS Starter Kit: Diabetes f ollow-up care

the clinical decision support consortium: overview

Beacon User Stories Version 1.0

InteGreat EHR Meaningful Use 2 Features and Reports Jenni Walters, Sr. Business Analyst, McKesson Beth Crews, Business Analyst, McKesson

ehr Sharable Data Vicky Fung Senior Health Informatician ehr Information Standards Office

Medicare EHR Incentive Program - Meaningful Use

OBJECTIVES AGING POPULATION AGING POPULATION AGING IMPACT ON MEDICARE AGING POPULATION

2012 Physician Quality Reporting System:

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

Clinical Decision Support Consortium

EHR Data Reuse through openehr Archetypes

HL7 and Meaningful Use

HL7 and Meaningful Use

ACO Program: Quality Reporting Requirements. Jennifer Faerberg Mary Wheatley April 28, 2011

Work Product of the HITPC Meaningful Use Workgroup Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations

Optum Physician EMR v 8.1 Release Notes

Using Health Information Technology to Improve Quality of Care: Clinical Decision Support

Work Product of the HITPC Meaningful Use Workgroup DRAFT Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations

2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule Quality Provisions

An Introduction to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for Eligible Professionals

Attesting for Meaningful Use Stage 2 in 2014 Customer Help Guide

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

Electronic Medical Records Meaningful Use Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS. Master Files to Update...2. Prepare Superbill Encounter Forms...

HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 Final Recommendations

James R. Christina, DPM FPMA 2014 Annual Meeting Naples, FL

Overview of Clinical Quality Measures Reporting in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Final Rule on Meaningful Use

The Role of Health Information Technology in Improving Health Care

Agenda. Topic Industry Today - Quality Measure Reporting Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Overview - Tenet Experience

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Healthcare Data: Secondary Use through Interoperability

Performance Measurement for the Medicare and Medicaid Eligible (MME) Population in Connecticut Survey Analysis

Understanding how to use the Quality Measure Step by Step Documents

Allscripts CQS Planning for 2014 Webinar: FAQs

Making Sense of EMR Adoption as Complex Interventions in Primary Health Care

Clinical Quality Measure Crosswalk: HEDIS, Meaningful Use, PQRS, PCMH, Beacon, 10 SOW

Draft Pan-Canadian Primary Health Care Electronic Medical Record Content Standard, Version 2.0 (PHC EMR CS) Frequently Asked Questions

STROKE PREVENTION IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Clinician Guide: Bridges to Excellence Diabetes Care Recognition Program

Clinical Decision Support: Marrying Technology and Policy

Effective ACO Compliance

ProviderReport. Message from the CEO. Provider Relations adds Provider Partnership team

HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011

May 7, Submitted electronically via Re: CMS 0044 P. Dear Administrator Tavenner:

From Guidelines to Clinical Decision Support: a Unified Approach to Translating and Implementing Knowledge

Contract Number: Prepared by: AHRQ National Resource Center for Health Information Technology

Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY

Re: CMS-1345-P; Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations; Proposed Rule

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology with My Vision Express*

Chapter Three Accountable Care Organizations

Beyond the EMR: Disease Registries 3/5/2010

Practice management system criteria checklist

Creating a national electronic health record: The Canada Health Infoway experience

STROKE PREVENTION IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. TARGET AUDIENCE: All Canadian health care professionals. OBJECTIVE: ABBREVIATIONS: BACKGROUND:

How To Improve Care At Geisinger

HIMSS Davies Enterprise Application --- COVER PAGE ---

INTERMEDIATE. CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT: More Than Just Alerts Tipsheet EHR. Background

What to Expect in Next Year & Developing Your ACO Action Plan

Clinical Knowledge Manager. Product Description 2012 MAKING HEALTH COMPUTE

We're Ready for MU2...Are You?

Clinical Decision Support Product Area Rong Chen MD PhD Chief Medical Informatics Officer

Toward Data and Knowledge Interoperability: The Clinical Decision Support Consortium

Teasing Some Meaning Out of Meaningful Use

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements Overview.

Distributed Networking

What s happening with 2014 EHR Incentive Program Attestations?

Welcome UDS Review for Intergy CHC Jeff Urkevich Director of Health Solutions Health Choice Network

Meaningful Use Reporting Quick Reference

Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11. Michael L. Brody, DPM

The Human Factor of Clinical Decision Support. Implementing Behavior Change as we Implement the Tools

Clinical Decision Support Systems An Open Source Perspective

2016 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Claims and Registry Reporting of Individual Measures

ACO Name and Location Allina Health Minneapolis, Minnesota

Medical Billing Requirements - Medicaid Incentive Checklist

Electronic Health Record Systems Public Health Functionality

Explanation of CMS Proposed Performance Measurement Framework for ACOs and Comparison with IHA P4P Measure Set April 2011

FACT SHEET. Providing Patients with Patient-Specific Education Resources

11/2/2015 Domain: Care Coordination / Patient Safety

Dr. Peters has declared no conflicts of interest related to the content of his presentation.

HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011

Trends in Part C & D Star Rating Measure Cut Points

After Visit Summary (AVS) VA Loma Linda Healthcare System

Embedding Guidance in the Kaiser Permanente EHR. Wiley Chan, MD Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Oakland, CA, USA

Going beyond Meaningful Use with EMR solutions from the Centricity portfolio

caresy caresync Chronic Care Management

Primary Care in the U.S. Measuring and Improving Primary Care in the United States ISQua Indicators Summit CMS Measures. Primary Care Measures

Orchard Software Webinar August 19, Slide 1

The Big Picture: IDNT in Electronic Records Glossary

Transcription:

Clinical Decision Support Consortium Knowledge Management Overview Overview of key steps in creating, maintaining and publishing CDS content The Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Consortium (CDSC) Knowledge Management (KM) Portal repository stores all created clinical artifacts, such as alerts, reminders, and infobuttons. The KM Portal contains semi-structured, structured and machine-executable content. Access to the KM Portal is gained after e-signing an electronic end-user agreement. See: http://kmportal.partners.org/ CDS Design Process Identify relevant guidelines and determine proper intervention type Analyze current knowledge assets and determine gaps Create content specification artifacts Vet with Subject Matter Expert Review Patient Information model for accuracy Model necessary subsets and classes Design Rule templates or helper methods Author executable rules Test rules Specifications Each rule-set represents between 30 and 50 clinical rules and may include 200+ concepts Knowledge Management Workflow Develop Clinical Content (Artifact & Technical) Reconcile Clinical Content Maintain and Update Clinical Content Utilize Clinical Content in CDS Services Publish Clinical Content to KM Portal CDS Content Maintenance Reference terminology and guideline monitoring Analyze impact on existing rules Facilitate Subject Matter Expert review Refine rules specifications to reflect updated content Update value sets, operational & classification rules Test and deploy updated rules Upload new artifacts to KM Portal Future Outlook As the CDSC tools and content library mature, the number of expected features will grow and time-to-market will decrease. This is due to the following: Superior knowledge authoring tool Leading subject matter experts Experience with process Re-use of content library

CDS Consortium Knowledge Management Portal Services CDSC KM Portal CDSC eroom The CDSC KM Portal is a repository of CDS intervention specifications which are searchable by key-word and a variety of metadata filters. CDSC customers may: 1. Set up a walk through of the portal early in the integration process in order to inspect the CDS interventions content as well as value set content 2. Read and review the actual rules at all levels, including viewing the rules as written in the rules editor 3. Review value set content that is referenced by the rules to assist with content alignment and data definition reconciliation The CDSC eroom supports virtual, asynchronous collaborative CDS intervention and value set design. CDSC customers participating in CDS content design or in the content alignment process may collaborate with CDSC team members in these virtual environments. Recommended Resources The CDSC recommends that customer resources such as clinical informaticians, technical engineers, and project managers collaborate closely with the CDSC KM services team to achieve successful integration of CDSC cloud-based CDS services.

CDS Consortium Cloud-Based CDS Services Overview CDSC cloud-based CDS services are provided by the Enterprise Clinical Informatics Infrastructure Services and Knowledge Management teams from Partners HealthCare System. These services provides the infrastructure for ongoing CDSC research trials. Integration with CDSC CDS services can reduce time-to-market deployment and enhancement of key rules-based decision support, with the backing of the CDSC team. Goals Data Requirements Clinicians access a reliable, proven source of highquality, actionable decision support from multiple locations and various electronic health records Healthcare knowledge management outsourced to world-class decision support service Consumers focus on clinical practice, rather than technology HITSP C32 v 2.5 (C80/C83 v 2.0) compliant Continuity of Care Document (CCD) with the following terminologies: Medication Ingredients.RxNorm Medication Classes..NDF-RT Labs, Vital Signs...LOINC Problems, Procedures. SNOMED, ICD, CPT Architecture Features Cloud-based Services Inside Partners Network Remotely hosted, secure web service called by applications to execute decision support rules and guidelines PHS Firewall Outside Partners Network All consumers Data Normalization and Classification Services Accepts standards-based CCD as data input Returns an XML-based Action Model, allowing endusers complete control over decision support presentation Underlying Business Rules Management System supports broad array of clinical decision support tools

CDS Consortium Cloud-Based CDS Services Integration and Related Steps User Requirements 1 Demonstrate an ability to create a CCD that is compliant with CDSC requirements: a) Complies with HITSP C-32 v 2.5 (C80/C83 v 2.0) standard b) Uses terminologies and value sets as specified by the CDSC Legal Aspects c) If participating in a study, de-identifies header information as specified by the BWH institutional review board (IRB) Work with local and CDSC legal teams to sign a data sharing and services sharing agreements. 7 2 User Logistics Obtain digital certificate for access to the CDSC cloud-based CDS services; establish and test the connection. If participating in a study, obtain local institutional review board IRB approval. 8 3 Determine where and how to call the service from within your system and implement. Testing 4 Determine where and how to present returned recommendations; implement your preferred presentation from the XML response returned by the service. Conduct end to end testing together with the CDSC Services team. 9 5 6 Validate and align the meaning of the clinical codes used by your EHR with the codes used by CDSC rules. Content subsets are available on the CDSC KM Portal, as are documents displaying individual CDSC rules. If participating in a study, log timing data at various points during data preparation and service calls, and send to the research database. Begin production use. 10 * Integration efforts vary based on complexity of service insertion and dictionary reconciliation.

CDS Consortium Cloud-Based CDS Services Rule Content Summary Clinical Decision Support (CDS) content available in the Enterprise Clinical Rules Service (ECRS) 11 Clinical Reminders 1. Reminders for patients with Non-gestational Diabetes Mellitus: annual foot and eye exam, semi-annual Hemoglobin A1c test, annual urine micro albumin/creatinine ratio measurement, for patients with Non-gestational Diabetes Mellitus and renal disease, consider starting angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), and for patients with Non-gestational Diabetes Mellitus and renal disease and contraindications to ACE-I present, consider starting angiotensin-2 receptor antagonist (ARB). 2. Reminders for patients with Hypertension: annual blood pressure check. 3. Anti-Platelet Therapy (for patients with ischemic vascular disease, CAD or equivalent): recommend starting antiplatelet therapy and consider starting anti-platelet therapy, but potential contraindications exist. 375 CDC Immunization Schedule Rules The ECRS contains rules implementing the February 2012 CDC Immunization Guidelines pertaining to all pediatric and adult vaccine schedules (including catch-up schedules). These rules cover only a limited number of indications and contraindications, specifically those based on: Demographics (age and gender), Problem List, and Procedures. 37 Traumatic Brain Injury Risk Assessment Rules These rules assess for clinically-important traumatic brain injuries (citbi) in children younger than two years and 2-18 years after blunt head trauma to determine whether cranial CT scans for these patients are advisable. The citbi prediction rules were previously derived and validated by the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network and published in the Lancet in 2009. 50+ Classification Rules Classification Rules can be used alone or as part of other rules such as Clinical Reminders and Alerts. These rules include rules that define: Clinical States, Indication States, Contraindication States, Goal States, and Risk States, etc. 25 CHA 2 DS 2 VASc Rules Calculates a CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score to determine stroke risk for ambulatory patients with atrial fibrillation and generates a quality metric for treatment guideline adherence for outpatient clinics.

CDS Consortium Cloud-Based CDS Services Examples The following are examples of CDSC cloud-based CDS services providing decision support within the ambulatory medical records of two members of the CDS Consortium. Partners HealthCare EHR Regenstrief Medical Record System Reminders