Rev Testing

Similar documents
Safety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests

ENHANCEMENT OF SEAT PERFORMANCE IN LOW-SPEED REAR IMPACT

RCAR Low-speed structural crash test protocol

Volvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents

COMPARISON OF BIORID INJURY CRITERIA BETWEEN DYNAMIC SLED TESTS AND VEHICLE CRASH TESTS

A name a commitment! These are the criteria which have characterized the development of dependable everyday cars up to the present time.

Pedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car

DEVELOPMENT OF MOVING DEFORMABLE BARRIER IN JAPAN - PART 2 -

climate unit for the passenger compartment.

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

US FMVSS 202 Final Rule

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

SEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS

CASE STUDY. Test Laboratories. Volvo Cars Safety Centre Accelerometers Help Improve Car Safety. Sweden. Automotive. Transducers

VEHICLE POSTMORTEM AND DATA ANALYSIS OF A PASSENGER RAIL CAR COLLISION TEST

A Systematic Approach for Improving Occupant Protection in Rollover Crashes

Booster Seat. OWNER'S MANUAL Model Graco

Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes

CRASH PROTECTION FOR CHILDREN IN AMBULANCES Recommendations and Procedures* Marilyn J. Bull, M.D., Kathleen Weber, Judith Talty, Miriam Manary

DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL INFORMATION

The Science of Pet Safety. Center for Pet Safety 2015 Pet Travel Seat Pilot Summary Report. Scope. Background. Purpose.

Secure Them for Life. Child safety seats. From infant seats to seat belts, everything you need to know to ensure your child s safety.

The safety of child wheelchair occupants in road passenger vehicles

CASPER CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS. Car Technology. SPEAKER: Britta Schnottale BASt. CASPER and EPOCh Final Workshop 13 th -15

2016 Evolocity High Schools competition Technical regulations

Best Practice Guide Vehicle Ergonomics Best Practice Guide

FRONTAL COLLISION BUSES AND COACHES. RESEARCH AND PROBLEMS

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

PEDESTRIAN HEAD IMPACT ANALYSIS

Supplementary restraints system

Event Data Recorder - Reference Document

EXPERIMENTAL CRASH TESTS INVOLVING PASSENGER CARS AND THE PROTOTYPE CONCRETE PROTECTIVE BARRIER

Dynamic Analysis of Child in Misused CRS During Car Accident

Motorcycle accident reconstruction in VL Motion

The SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) includes side and Inflatable Curtain (IC) airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (double), Passenger (single)

Classification of Crash Pattern Based on Vehicle Acceleration and Prediction Algorithm for Occupant Injury

Rear Impact Dummy Biofidelity

CORRELATION OF VEHICLE AND ROADSIDE CRASH TEST INJURY CRITERIA

Presented by the expert of France 55th Session of the UN ECE Working Party on Passive Safety GRSP May 2014 Agenda Items 15

Rear Impact Guard TEST METHOD 223. Standards and Regulations Division. Issued: December 2003

The influence of passive safety systems on head injuries suffered by the vehicle s driver

UPDATED REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Securing Child in Carrier Child Requirements...24 Changing Harness Height...25

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

FAAC International, Inc.

REARWARD- & FORWARD-FACING USER MANUAL ECE R GROUP WEIGHT AGE 0+/ kg 6m-4y

NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

SEAT BELT Installation Manual

ACCIDENTS AND NEAR-MISSES ANALYSIS BY USING VIDEO DRIVE-RECORDERS IN A FLEET TEST

CRASH TESTS TO ASSESS THE SECONDARY SAFETY OF A LARGE MPV

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

Q dummy family. Fahrzeugsicherheit Berlin e.v. Robert Kant, Christian Kleessen (Humanetics)

CYBEX GmbH Riedinger Str Bayreuth Germany.

1 Flexitank/Container Combination Rail Impact Test Criteria

ADSEAT. An EU funded project within the 7th Framework Programme. Adaptive Seat to Reduce Neck Injuries for Female and Male Occupants

TEST REPORT N

Relationship of Dynamic Seat/Head Restraint Ratings to Real-world Neck Injury Rates

Balancing Active and Passive Safety

Comparisons EBB 11/12/02 Snell M2000, DOT, BSI Type A and EN 22/05

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

VEHICLE EQUIPMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Working Paper. Extended Validation of the Finite Element Model for the 2010 Toyota Yaris Passenger Sedan

The Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany

»Product» Safety Warning

Predicting throw distance variations in bicycle crashes

PROGRAMMABLE DECELERATION DEVICES FOR AUTOMOTIVE TESTING

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) FILM & PHOTO PROTOCOL

Safety in Road-Construction areas. 360 Conference bro

F1 Fuel Tank Surging; Model Validation

Rick Galdos, Forensic Engineering 1

STIFFNESS RELEVANCE AND STRENGTH RELEVANCE IN CRASH OF CAR BODY COMPONENTS

Make the right choice. Vehicle safety advice for older drivers

EFFECT OF VEHICLE DESIGN ON HEAD INJURY SEVERITY AND THROW DISTANCE VARIATIONS IN BICYCLE CRASHES

WARNING: USA Instructions for use EN. Weight limits in rear-facing mode: 5-45 lbs ( kg)

Does the Federal government require them? No, the Federal government does not require manufacturers to install EDRs.

OPEL CORSA UTILITY BASE

SUSPENSION AND STEERING OVERVIEW

Skoda Octavia 66% 82% ADULT OCCUPANT. Total 34 pts 93% Skoda Octavia 1.6 'Ambition', LHD SIDE IMPACT REAR IMPACT (WHIPLASH) 2,6 pts WHIPLASH

Impact Kinematics of Cyclist and Head Injury Mechanism in Car to Bicycle Collision

Explore 3: Crash Test Dummies

AUDI A3 Sportback e-tron

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

OWNER S MANUAL. Permolock C3. Docking system for Power wheelchair in vehicle

Tram interface crashworthiness

PREDICTING THROW DISTANCE VARIATIONS IN BICYCLE CRASHES

Center for Pet Safety 2015 Crate Crashworthiness Study Summary Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Securing Child in Carrier Child Requirements...24 Changing Harness Height...25

D. In the case of bus type motor vehicles, standing spaces provided with straps, grip bars or grip handles.

Mazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

INFLUENCE OF CRASH SEVERITY ON VARIOUS WHIPLASH INJURY SYMPTOMS: A STUDY BASED ON REAL-LIFE REAR-END CRASHES WITH RECORDED CRASH PULSES

Thorsten Adolph, Marcus Wisch, Andre Eggers, Heiko Johannsen, Richard Cuerden, Jolyon Carroll, David Hynd, Ulrich Sander

DEVELOPMENT OF HELICOPTER SAFETY DEVICES

SERVICE MANUAL. Corpus 3G. Seat system for electric wheelchair

How To Compare Head Injury Risk From A Front Crash Test To Head Injury From A Head Injury

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

Product Overview. Restraint systems. Flooring systems. Seating systems. Solar systems

Seatbelt Solutions

Suzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Transcription:

Author, department Mikael Videby Structural and Solid Mechanics Technical Life and Safety SPCT Method 1 ( 8) SPCT-method Pet crate testing Scope... 2 References... 2 1 Test object selection... 2 2 Test object... 2 3 Testing.................. 2 3.1 Frontal impact crash test... 3 3.1.1 Measuring of the test object... 3 3.1.2 Prepare/connection of equipment... 3 3.1.3 Tuning of speed and deceleration pulse... 3 3.1.4 Installing the test object... 3 3.1.5 Photography and documentation prior to the test... 3 3.1.6 Testing and Evaluation... 3 3.1.7 Photography and documentation after the test... 3 3.1.8 Evaluation of the criteria... 4 3.2 Rear impact crash test... 4 3.2.1 Measuring of the test object... 4 3.2.2 Preparation/connection of equipment... 4 3.2.3 Tuning of speed and deceleration pulse... 4 3.2.4 Installing the crash test dummy and test object... 4 3.2.5 Adjustments of the intrusion barrier... 5 3.2.6 Photography and documentation prior to the test... 5 3.2.7 Testing and evaluation... 5 3.2.8 Photography and documentation after the test... 5 3.2.9 Evaluation of the Criteria... 5 3.3 Drop Test in order to simulate a roll over situation... 6 3.3.1 Measuring of the test object... 6 3.3.2 Preparation and connectionn of equipment... 6 3.3.3 Suspension of the test object in the release mechanism... 6 3.3.4 Measuring of the vertical drop and the adjustment of impact angles... 6 3.3.5 Photography and documentation prior to the test... 6 3.3.6 Testing and evaluation... 6 3.3.7 Photography and documentation of the damages to the test objects... 6 3.3.8 Evaluation of criteria... 7 4 Calculating criteria... 7 5 Measurement uncertainty... 8 6 Test report... 8

2 ( 8) Scope The SPCT 1 method refers to testing of pet crates for safety of pets and passengers in a collision with a car. It provides instructions how pet crate safety can be tested as there is no applicable standard. The rear seat strength in a frontal collision is normally tested according to United Nations regulations no. 17 (ECE R17) with wooden blocks. The same frontal impact test is carried out with the dog crate as one of the three elements of the SPCT method. Studies of statistics regarding the number of families with both dogs and children in Sweden have shown that an increasing number of rear-end collisions with a dog crate in the luggage compartmentt area will occur as the use of dog crates continue to increase. (Ny metod för analys av hundburars påverkan på bilars säkerhet, Anders Flogård, MIM Construction AB, 2008-02-22). A test of the crate performance and ability to not transfer energy into the back seat in a rear end collision is one of the test elements. The robustness of the crate is also taken into account in the testing methodology to prevent injuries to animals and passengers in all types of collision directions. References [ 1] ECE R17 APPROVAL OF VEHICLES WITH REGARD TO THE SEATS, THEIR ANCHORAGES AND ANY HEAD RESTRAINTS [2] ECE R44 APPROVAL OF RESTRAINING DEVICES FOR CHILD OCCUPANTS OF VEHICLES Rev.2, Annex 9, 6 nov. 2009 Rev.2, Annex 7 - Appendix 2, 14 feb. 2011 1 Test object selection The test objects are selected by the customer. 2 Test object Drawings of the test object shall be submitted along with the test object. The maximumm permissible load for the test object shall be stated such as 45 kg or 2x35 kg. Fasteners and mounting instructions for the vehicle must accompany the test object. 3 Testing The testing consists of three elements. A frontal impact test in a car body with the crate installed in the luggage compartment, a barrier collision against the crate and the car body simulating a rear end collision and a drop test against a cornerr of the crate in order to test the robustness of the crate in all types of crash directions. 1 SPCT standss for Safe Pet Crate Test

3 ( 8) 3.1 Frontal impact crash test The parts included in the frontal crash test are as follows: Measuring of the test object Tuning of speed and deceleration pulse Photography and documentation prior to the test Testing and evaluation Photography and documentation after the test Evaluation of the criteria 3.1.1 Measuring of the test object The test object is being controlled for compliance with the submitted drawings. 3.1.2 Prepare/connection of equipment Make sure all the equipment is calibrated. Check the views and operation of the high-speed cameras. 3.1.3 Tuning of speed and deceleration pulse The rear part of a prepared Volvo V70N body is mounted on the crash sled. The rear seat backs mounted in the body must have a 60/40 split and have an aluminumm frame (2001-2004). The backs are positioned in the comfort mode. The speed of the sled and the deceleration pulse simulates a front collision taken from the ECE R17 [1]. 3.1.4 Installing the test object The dog crate shall be placed in the luggage compartment in accordance to the manufacturer's instructions, see figure 1 in Appendix 1. If the test object consists of a separate areaa it requires a 45 kg payload and if the test object consisting of two separate areas it requires two payloads of 35 kg each. If permissible load is reduced by the manufacturer that same load should be used during testing. 3.1.5 Photography and documentation prior to the test The positioning of the test object is photographed and documented. 3.1.6 Testing and Evaluation The crash test is performed by accelerating the crash sled with the car body to a speed of 48-50 km/h and then decelerate the crash sled in 20-28 g to simulate a frontal impact car crash. The deceleration is measured by accelerometers mounted on the crash sled. The deceleration graph is analyzed after the test. 3.1.7 Photography and documentation after the test Damage to the test object, the luggage compartment floor and seat backs are photographed and documented after the test.

4 ( 8) 3.1.8 Evaluation of the criteria The criteria for the frontal crash test is based on the following: Risk for the pet to fall out of the test object during and after the crash? Sharp edges after the crash. Can the dog be severely injured by sharp edges if the car rolls over several times? Can the test object be opened and evacuated after the test without the need of tools and/or excessive force. Does the test object have an evacuation hatch. A hatchh that can be used if the regular door can t be opened or accessed after an accident. 3.2 Rear impact crash test The elements included in the rear impact crash test are as follows: Measuring of the test object Preparation/connection of equipment Tuning of speed and deceleration pulse Installation of crash test dummy and test object Adjustments of the intrusion barrier Photography and documentation prior to the test Testing and evaluation Photography and documentation after the test Evaluation of the criteria 3.2.1 Measuring of the test object The test sample is being controlled for compliance with the submitted drawings. 3.2.2 Preparation/connection of equipment Make sure all the equipment is calibrated. Check that the correct measurement range is set for dummy accelerometers. Check the views and function of the high-speed cameras. 3.2.3 Tuning of speed and deceleration pulse The rear part of a prepared Volvo V70N body is mounted on the crash sled. The rear seat backs mounted in the body must have a 60/40 split and have an aluminumm frame (2001-2004). The backs are positioned in the comfort mode. The speed of the sled and the deceleration pulse simulates a rear end collision taken from the ECE R44 [2]. 3.2.4 Installing the crash test dummy and test object A Hybrid III 50 percentile crash test dummy is placed in the left rear seat (position 4 in accordance with ISO encoding). The Dummy shall be equipped with a three-axial accelerometer in the head and a single axial accelerometer at the height of the upper thoracic vertebrae, T1, see figure 4 in Appendix 1. The dog crate shall be installed in the luggage compartmentt in accordance to the manufacturer's instructions, see figure 2 in Appendix 1. If the test object consists of a separate area it requires a 45 kg payload and if the test object consisting of two separatee areas it requires two payloads of 35 kg each. If permissible load is reduced by the manufacturer that same load should be used.

5 ( 8) 3.2.5 Adjustments of the intrusion barrier The intrusionn barrier is adjusted so that a minimumm of clearance against the luggage compartmentt floor is achieved. The deformation of the test object shall begin at about 100 mm of travel after the crash sled deceleration start, see figure 3 in Appendix 1. 3.2.6 Photography and documentation prior to the test The positioning of the crash test dummy and the test object is photographed and documented. 3.2.7 Testing and evaluation The crash test is performed by accelerating the crash sled with the body to a speed of 30-32 km/h and then decelerate the crash sled in 14-21 g to simulate a rear impact car crash. Deceleration is measured by accelerometers mounted on the crash sled. The deceleration graph is analyzed after the test. 3.2.8 Photography and documentation after the test Damage to the test object, luggage compartment floor and seat backs are photographed and documented. The upholstery on the seat backs must be removed before taking photos. 3.2.9 Evaluation of the Criteria The criteria for the rear impact crash test are based on the following: Head 3 ms acceleration and HIC 36. Acceleration dataa from the three axial accelerometer in the dummy head should be filtered using a CFC 1000 filter. The HIC 36 and the maximum acceleration during the main 3 milliseconds, multiple peaks, is calculated. T1 acceleration. The acceleration of the dummy upper thoracic vertebra is filtered using CFC 180 and the highest value is noted. Horizontal deformation of the seat back. The deformation of the seat back measured over the entire seat back flat part, with a reference steel scale or similar positioned towards the top and bottom of the seat back, see figures 5 and 6 in Appendix 1. Penetration depth of the seat back. Isolated holes or deformations from penetrating parts are measured in depth compared to the back flat part, see figure 7. Risk for the pet to fall out of the test object during and after the crash? Sharp edges after the crash. Can the dog be severely injured by sharp edges if the car rolls over several times? Can the test object be opened and evacuated after the test without the need of tools and/or excessive force. Does the test object have an evacuation hatch. A hatchh that can be used if the regular door can t be opened or accessed after an accident.

6 ( 8) 3.3 Drop Test in orderr to simulate a roll over situation The elements included in the drop test: Measuring of the test object Preparation/connection of equipment Suspension of the test object in the release mechanismm Measuring of vertical drop height and the adjustment of impact angle Photography and documentation prior to the test Testing and evaluation Photography and documentation after the test Evaluation of the criteria 3.3.1 Measuring of the test object The test object is being checked for compliance by submitted drawings. 3.3.2 Preparation and connection of equipment Make sure all the equipment is calibrated. If the test should be recorded with a digital video recorder, check the view and the operation of the camera. 3.3.3 Suspension of the test object in the releasee mechanismm A release mechanism that is not likely to affect the subject is being positioned above a rigid drop target. The test object is attached with strapss to the release mechanism, see figure 8 in Appendix 1. 3.3.4 Measuring of the vertical drop and the adjustment of impact angles The weakest corner of the test object shall be exposed to the drop test and this point is to be decided through an engineering assessment. The position of the test object is adjusted by straps and rotated around the vehicle' s intended longitudinal axis 45 and then rotated around the vehicle transverse axis 15, see figure 8 in Appendix 1. The drop height for the lowest point of the test object is adjusted to 70 cm above the rigid drop target. If the test object consists of a separatee area it requires a 45 kg payload and if the test object consisting of two separatee areas it requires two payloads of 35 kg each. If permissible load is reduced by the manufacturer that same load should be used. 3.3.5 Photography and documentation prior to the test The positioning of the test object is photographed and documented. 3.3.6 Testing and evaluation The test object is released by a releasee mechanismm against the drop target. The impact speed is calculated to be approximately 3.7 m/s. The test can be recorded by a digital video camera upon request to facilitate further analysis. 3.3.7 Photography and documentation of the damages to the test objects Damage to the test object is photographed and documented.

7 ( 8) 3.3.8 Evaluation of criteria The criteria for the simulation of the roll-over situation are based on the following: Risk for the pet to fall out of the test object during and after the crash? Sharp edges after the crash. Can the dog be severely injured by sharp edges if the car rolls over several times? Can the test object be opened and evacuated after the test without the need of tools and/or excessive force. Does the test object have an evacuation hatch. A hatchh that can be used if the regular door can t be opened or accessed after an accident. 4 Calculating criteria The overall test results from the threee test phases are added together to form green, yellow or red results in Table 1 below. Description of the criteria contained in Chapter 3.1.8, 3.2.9 and 3.3.8 above. Table 1 Test All test elements Rear end collision Criteria Risk for the pet to fall out of the test sample No - during and after the test Yes Sharp edges after the test No - Yes Test sample able to be opened and evacuated Yes - after the test without the use of tools/violence No Accessible evacuation hatch Yes No - Head 3 ms accc HIC 36 T1-acc Green Yellow Red < 70 g 70-80 g > 80 g < 400 400-500 > 500 < 70 g 70-80 g > 80 g Horizontal deformation of the seat back < 50 mm - > 50 mm Depth of penetration into the seat back < 15 mm - > 15 mm In order to get a Green result when tested it is required that the entire column "Green" is achieved. If the test object has no evacuation hatch the result may never be green. If any of the criteria is yellow (and no red), the complete test result is Yellow. If any of the criteria is red, the complete test result is Red.

8 ( 8) 5 Measurement uncertainty SP works consistently with relative measurement uncertainties, ie. uncertainties are given in percent of displayed or estimated value. To facilitate the reporting process, we specify to the maximum extent possible the same measurement uncertainty for different tests. To achieve this, all instruments is checked for their detailed contributions to the overall measurement uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty for the frontal crash testt and rear end collision test will be determined according to the derivation of the measurement uncertainty of crash testing, and dimensional analysis (length). Measurement uncertainty for the drop test is determined according to the derivation of the uncertainty of drop tests. 6 Test report A test report in accordance with SP's general writing rules shall also include: A summary of the test result A graph showing the head and neck acceleration for the crash testt dummy Deformations measured in the backrests and photographs of thesee A description of the conditionn of test object after each of the threee test elements Graphs showing the deceleration pulses and corridors of ECE R444 and ECE R17 A result matrix with maximumm reference values Measurement uncertainty and how it is calculated An overall drawing of the test object

1 (4) Appendix 1 Figure 1, Set-up, frontal impact test Figure 2, Set-up, rear impact test

2 (4) Appendix 1 Figure 3, The crash barrier position when the crash bars starts deforming (braking) Figure 4, Location of the T1 accelerometer in the crash test dummy

3 (4) Appendix 1 Figure 5, Measuring the horizontal deformation of the seat back Figure 6, Measuring the horizontal deformation of the seat back

4 (4) Appendix 1 Figure 7, Penetration hole after the rear impact test Figure 8, Angle adjustment of the testt object before the drop test