Providing Subsidized EHR to Physicians Under Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute. Charles B. Oppenheim, Esq.

Similar documents
FRAUD AND ABUSE CONCERNS FOR ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

group practice journal

ReedSmith. CMS and the OIG Extend Protections for Electronic Health Record Donations. Client Alert. Life Sciences Health Industry Group

Electronic Health Record License Agreements

How To Defend An Ehr Subsidy

Legal Issues in Electronic Health Records Acquisition, Implementation and Monitoring

Stark and Anti-kickback Regulations: Proposed Changes for E-prescribing and Electronic Health Records

Adopting Electronic Medical Records: What Do the New Federal Incentives Mean to Your Individual Physician Practice?

The Road to Meaningful Use EHR Stimulus Payments. By Amy S. Leopard, Walter & Haverfield LLP

Meaningful Use Requires Meaningful Laboratory Results

Discovering a Potential Overpayment: An Law, and Medicare Reimbursement Considerations

FRAUD, WASTE & ABUSE. Training for First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities. Slide 1 of 24

OHIO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 2015 Annual Meeting. Accountable Care Organizations Comprehensive Integration Strategy

Fraud and Abuse Primer. Stark Law The Anti-Kickback Statute False Claims Act

Prepared by: The Office of Corporate Compliance & HIPAA Administration

Health Care Compliance Association

Frequently Asked Questions: Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Payment Program

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS

Agenda. Government s Role in Promoting EMR Technology. EMR Trends in Health Care. What We Hear as Reasons to Not Implement and EMR

Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

I. Policy Purpose. II. Policy Statement. III. Policy Definitions: RESPONSIBILITY:

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Meaningful Use Stage 1:

Legal & Policy Issues Related to ACO Formation by Independent Physician Groups

The recently enacted Health Information Technology for Economic

2010 MHA Governance Leadership Forum: Accountable Care Organizations. Chris Rossman, Esq. Foley & Lardner LLP Detroit, Michigan

THE CHRIST HOSPITAL POLICY NO ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PAGE 1 OF 6 COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE AND STARK LAW

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

Hospital-Based Provider A provider who furnishes 90% or more of their services in a hospital setting (inpatient, outpatient, or emergency room).

11 Key Concepts from the Stark Law

Accountable Care Organizations: Legal and Organizational Structures; Governance

FAQs for AMDA Members on the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs, Including Medicare Payment Adjustments

ADDENDUM TO RFQ DOCUMENTS

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Basis and Purpose Definitions Application Eligibility... 11

Meaningful Use: Terms & Timelines, Changes to Stage 1, and Stage 2 Overview

LMHS COMPLIANCE ORIENTATION Physicians and Midlevel Providers. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud & Abuse

REGULATORY UPDATE: TELEMEDICINE

Incentive Programs that Reward Collaborative Physician Efforts to Improve the Quality and Cost- Effective Delivery of Hospital Care

Health Information Technology (HIT) and the Medicaid/CHIP Health Information Exchange (HIE) Advisory Committee

Client Alert. CMS Releases Proposed Rule On Meaningful Use Of Electronic Health Record Technology

MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY

CMS FINALIZES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

A Roadmap for New Physicians. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse

E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments for Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use Objectives

AVOIDING LEGAL PITFALLS: ADOPTION OF MARKETING EXPENSE BUDGET AND GIFT POLICY

MEDICARE COMPLIANCE TRAINING EMPLOYEES & FDR S Revised

CHAPTER 114. AN ACT establishing a Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Demonstration Project and supplementing Title 30 of the Revised Statutes.

Health Care February 28, CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,

Expanded Support for Medicaid Health Information Exchanges

How To Bridge The Chasm Between Provider And Patient

SECTION 18 1 FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE

COMPENSATING EMPLOYED PHYSICIANS Tax Law, Stark and Anti-Kickback Implications. AHLA Tax Issues for Healthcare Organizations October 20-22, 2013

Frequently Asked Questions American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the HITECH Act

Fraud and Abuse Considerations for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)

CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Negotiating EHR Agreements: Complying with HIPAA, Stark and AKS, Overcoming Privacy and Security Risks

Transcription:

Providing Subsidized to Physicians Under Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute Presented by Charles B. Oppenheim, Esq. coppenheim@health-law.com (310) 551-8110 Subsidizing for Physicians: Why would I want to do that? Helps to further hospital/physician alignment. Enhances quality, efficiency and performance. Allows physicians to access Medicare/Medicaid incentive payments. ACO s are coming soon! 2 1

Stark and Anti-Kickback What are the Stark law and the Antikickback statute and why do I care about them? 3 Exception What s Required? that qualifies includes software, information technology, training, maintenance, help desk, etc. Note: Hardware cannot be donated; cash cannot be given; and you cannot subsidize the staff required to input old records into system. 4 2

Exception What s Required? Cont d The donated items and services must be used predominately to create, maintain, transmit, or receive. software may have ancillary functions, provided that the functions predominate and that the ancillary functions relate to the care and treatment of individual patients; The software must be interoperable at the time it is provided to the physician. Software is deemed interoperable if a certifying body recognized by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services has certified the software no more than 12 months prior to the date it is provided to the recipient; 5 Exception What s Required? Cont d The donor (or any person acting on the donor s behalf) does not take any action to limit or restrict the use, compatibility, or interoperability of the items or services with other prescribing or systems; Before receipt of the items and services, the physician pays at least 15% of the donor s cost for the items and services (the Physician Contribution ). The donor (or any party related to the donor) does not finance the Physician Contribution or loan funds to be used by the physician to pay for the items or services; 6 3

Exception What s Required? Cont d Neither the physician nor the physician s practice (including employees and staff members) makes the receipt of items or services, or the amount or nature of the items or services, a condition of doing business with the donor. Neither the eligibility of a physician for the items of services, nor the amount or nature of the items and services, is determined in a manner that directly takes into account the volume or value of referrals or other business generated between the parties (note: taking referrals indirectly into account is OK); 7 Exception What s Required? Cont d A written agreement between the parties sets forth the costs of the items and services and other terms of the arrangement; The donor does not have actual knowledge of, and does not act in reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance of, the fact that the physician possesses or has obtained items and services equivalent to those provided by the donor; 8 4

Exception What s Required? Cont d 9 For items and services that are of the type that can be used for any patient without regard to payor status, the donor does not restrict, or take any action to limit, the physician s right or ability to use the items and services for any patient; The items and services do not include staffing of physician offices and are not used primarily to conduct personal business unrelated to the physician s medical practice; Exception What s Required? Cont d The donor does not shift the costs of the items or services to any federal health care program; and The contains electronic prescribing capability. The regulations became effective on October 10, 2006, and sunset on December 31, 2013. 10 5

11 What Can Be Donated? function must predominate need not be exclusive function. Cannot provide equivalent or duplicative technology, but can provide upgrades or items or services that would (1) enhance functionality, or (2) standardize systems. What if physician has equivalent technology, but it doesn t meet meaningful use under ARRA/HIT? How Can Physicians Be Selected? 12 Can t take their referrals directly into account. Can take their referrals indirectly into account. The regulations provide several criteria that, if used, will be deemed to not directly take into account the volume or value of referrals: Number of prescriptions. The total number of prescriptions written by the physician (but not volume/value of prescriptions dispensed or paid by the donor or billed to the Medicare or Medicaid programs); 6

How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d 13 Size of practice. The size of the physician s practice (e.g., total patients, total patient encounters, or total relative value units); Total hours. The total number of hours that the physician practices medicine; Use of technology. The overall use of automated technology in the medical practice (but not use of technology in connection with referrals made to the hospital); How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d Medical staff membership. Whether the physician is a member of the hospital s medical staff; Level of uncompensated care. The level of uncompensated care provided by the physician; In addition to the criteria set forth in the regulations, below are several criteria that could potentially be used. 14 7

15 How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d Adherence to quality protocols (which may change over time). Community need for physician services. Active Medical Staff Membership. Adequate personnel within a physician s office who can support the technology as a potential screening criteria. Physician specialty; How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d 16 Physicians who are good community citizens, potentially determined by considering: Participation in hospital quality improvement activities, Willingness to serve as a trainer for other physicians, Medical staff meeting attendance, Prompt completion of patient charts, Involvement in hospital committees, Consistent use of hospital-based inpatient information technology systems, Continuing medical education seminar attendance, and Participation in local professional associations. 8

How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d Physician adoption of compliance programs; Physician participation on hospital call panels; Physician participation in the Medi-Cal and Medicare programs; Physicians who participate in certain manage care plans; Medical school attended; Location of residency; Department (if the EMR technology is rolled out by department). 17 Who Can Be A Donor? Under Stark, any entity that bills for DHS. Under AKS, anyone who provides services covered by a federal healthcare program and submits claims or requests for payment from a federal healthcare program. 18 9

Determining 15% of Donor s Cost What if there are multiple donors to physician? How to determine/allocate costs? Direct, indirect, incremental, capital costs? Are different physician contribution percentages OK for different physicians? 19 Donations to Medical Group Regulations are written as to physician recipients. Eligible v. ineligible physicians. Addressing physician additions/departures. Addressing individual physician compliance with standards. 20 10

Other Laws/Issues Liability/Risk Management IRS/Tax-Exempt Organization Issues State Kickback/Physician Self-Referral Laws 21 Implementation Models Model One: Vendor 100% cost Donor 15% cost Physician 22 11

Implementation Models, Cont d Model Two: Donor 85% cost 15% cost Vendor Physician 23 12