Blue Canyon Holdings now holds 71.9 per cent of the company and we expect that Blue Canyon will retain full control of the company within 12 month.



Similar documents
E 2017E 2018E E 2017E 2018E

Important information: All information regarding limitation of liability and potential conflicts of interest can be found at the end of the report.

Important information: All information regarding limitation of liability and potential conflicts of interest can be found at the end of the report.

Auriant Mining AUR.ST

E 2016E 2017E

E 2015E 2016E. Revenue, MSEK Growth 79% 46% 18% 8% 6% EBITDA EBITDA margin 25% 22% 21% 24% 28%

E 2016E 2017E. Revenue, MSEK Growth 46% 16% 11% 6% 6% EBITDA EBITDA margin 22% 23% 21% 22% 25%

E 2016E 2017E. Revenue, MSEK Growth 46% 16% 12% 1% 6% EBITDA EBITDA margin 22% 23% 21% 22% 25%

E 2017E 2018E E 2017E 2018E

E 2017E 2018E

E 2016E 2017E E 2016E 2017E

E 2017E 2018E E 2017E 2018E

ZetaDisplay. Europe leads the way. EPaccess

E 2015E 2016E Revenue, MSEK 838 1,143 1,166 1,287 1,450 Growth 12% 36% 2% 10% 13%

E 2015E 2016E. Revenue, MSEK Growth 63% 32% 22% 61% 77%

E 2017E 2018E

E 2017E 2018E. Revenue, MSEK Growth 92% -90% 4,066% 49% 26% EBITDA EBITDA margin neg neg 1% 5% 15%

E 2017E 2018E E 2017E 2018E

E 2016E 2017E Revenue. MSEK Growth 0% 27% 42% 4% 7% EBITDA EBITDA margin -5% 13% 16% 17% 18%

MATELAN Research. Intelligent Transportation Systems MEGATRENDS DRIVE MARKET GROWTH FINANCIALS ACCELERATING IVU AND INIT SHOW HIGHEST UPSIDES

E 2016E 2017E Revenue, MSEK Growth -27% -2% 65% 34% 40%

2 September 2015 YOC AG. FIRST BERLIN Equity Research

BDI BioEnergy Intern Neutral. Activity level in Q3 might not support FY estimates

price target of We reiterate our Buy rating. Figure 1: Reported figures versus forecasts Source: First Berlin Equity Research, SFC Energy AG

G5 Entertainment. G5 Entertainment. Quarter Update Q3 15. Amended strategy and boosted profitability

Interim Report January 1 st March 31 st, 2003

20 May 2015 OpenLimit Holding AG. FIRST BERLIN Equity Research

DATRON AG. Investor day supports our positive view. Buy (Buy) EUR (12.50 EUR ) BANKHAUS LAMPE // 1 17/09/2015

BDI BioEnergy Internat Buy

Year-end Dec 2013A 2014E 2015E 2016E Key data. # Priced at market close, 29/09/14

Marti Otel. Martı REIT OUTPERFORM MARKETPERFORM. 01 November Equity / Small Cap. / Tourism. Upside Potential* 38%

22 December 2015 YOC AG. FIRST BERLIN Equity Research

SAF-HOLLAND Annual Financial Statements Detlef Borghardt, CEO Wilfried Trepels, CFO. March 14, 2013

VALUATIONS I Financial Metrics, Ratios, & Comparables Analysis. Fall 2015 Comp Week 6

TYPES OF FINANCIAL RATIOS

Kingdee (268 HK) Buy (maintained) Target price: HK$3.58. Solidifying leadership in cloud services; maintain Buy but revise TP down to HK$3.

Trxade Group, Inc. (TCQB: TRXD): Record Revenues in Q3

NEUTRAL. Weak FY14, but positive outlook thereafter. June 5 th, 2015

Tupras OUTPERFORM (M) 15 February Strong 2009 results on refining side...

Klöckner & Co SE. Q Results

Increasing market share in a receding market

Financial Statement Analysis: An Introduction

Interim report April-June 2003

TrustBuddy AB (publ.)

Interim Report January June 2001

SYMANTEC REPORTS FIRST QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2016 RESULTS

Flexituff International Ltd. (FIL)

Understanding Financial Information for Bankruptcy Lawyers Understanding Financial Statements

Basic valuation and accounting guide

Full Year Results 2014

FORACO INTERNATIONAL REPORTS Q3 2014

Diluted net income per share. Six months ended Sep. 30, Six months ended Sep. 30, 2011 (1.09) -

Contact: Ken Bond Deborah Hellinger Oracle Investor Relations Oracle Corporate Communications

How To Calculate Financial Leverage Ratio

Interim Report for the period 1 January 31 March 2015

N E W S R E L E A S E

Zebra Technologies Announces Record Sales for Second Quarter of 2006

SOLTEQ PLC S INTERIM REPORT

2013 Third Quarter Review October 25,

INVESTMENT RESEARCH DATA MODUL AG. Data Modul AG Recommendation. Date: 08/13/2014. Buy. Clear profitability increase in H1

Net sales increased with 16% to SEK 76.1 m (65.6). Net sales for the last four quarters totalled SEK m (306.6)

Focus on fleet customers SAF-HOLLAND Annual Financial Statements 2013

Software AG Results 1 st Quarter 2015 (IFRS, unaudited)

Company Presentation VTG AG Connecting worlds. Analyst Conference April 14, 2015

Eckert & Ziegler AG Germany - High-tech Engineering

Glossary and Formulas

Mouwasat Medical Services Company - Mouwasat

Accumulate. Exide Industries Ltd(EIL) Automobile Ancillaries RETAIL EQUITY RESEARCH

1.1 Role and Responsibilities of Financial Managers

Klöckner & Co SE. FY 2013 Results

Significant reduction in net loss

Contact: Ken Bond Deborah Hellinger Oracle Investor Relations Oracle Corporate Communications

Salesforce delivered the following results for its fiscal fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2015:

PI Industries. 2QFY16 Result Review HOLD. Custom synthesis restricted 2Q revenue growth ; maintain HOLD. Sector: AGRI

QUADRANT SKEW CAPITAL Syllabus

Gujarat State Petronet Ltd. INR 135

Simplex Infrastructures

Investment AB Kinnevik

Fundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9

Q2 / H results. Investor Presentation 30 July 2015

Advanced Merger Model Quick Reference Common Formulas & Model Setup. Transaction Structure & Assumptions

CEWE. Overweight. Financial Markets Research. Retail & Consumer Goods. - Ready for Christmas business- Annual report: Mar 15.

2012 Southwest IDEAS Investor Conference

Salesforce Announces Fiscal 2016 First Quarter Results Becomes First Enterprise Cloud Computing Company to Reach $6 Billion Revenue Run Rate

Contact: Marcel Goldstein CSC PRESS RELEASE Corporate Public Relations August 6, 2013 CSC

Interim Report. Interim Report. 1 January 30 June 2005

International Glossary of Business Valuation Terms*

Third quarter results as of December 31, Investor presentation

Monster Worldwide Reports Third Quarter 2015 Results

Interim Report January-March. A significant result improvement

INTERIM REPORT JANUARY 1 SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

W.W. Grainger, Inc. First Quarter 2015 Results Page 1 of 9

Aksa Enerji OUTPERFORM. 07 September Massive cut in 2011 production target more than priced in... Upside Potential* 80%

FSA Note: Summary of Financial Ratio Calculations

Management finished its homework. Attractive risk/reward profile

Business Valuation of Sample Industries, Inc. As of June 30, 2008

Carnegie Investment Bank AB (publ) Year-end report

LOGO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS

Practice Bulletin No. 2

Transcription:

COMPANY ANALYSIS 22 May 2014 Summary Cision (CSN.ST) In line with estimates Cision s Q1 report was overall in line with our forecasts and revenues amounted to SEK 206 million and operating profits to SEK 17 million. The European business showed a 4 per cent organic growth and the company reported a very strong operating cash flow for the quarter. Blue Canyon Holdings now holds 71.9 per cent of the company and we expect that Blue Canyon will retain full control of the company within 12 month. Our DCF indicate a value for Cision, as a stand-alone company, at SEK 45 per share. We therefore believe that the public offer level of SEK 61 per share is a fair deal for Cision s shareholders. List: Small Cap Market Cap: 910 MSEK Industry: Information Technology CEO: Peter Granat Chairman: Hans-Erik Andersson OMXS 30 Cision 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 06-May 04-Aug 02-Nov 31-Jan Redeye Rating (0 10 points) Management Ownership Growth prospect Profitability Financial strength 7.0 points 4.0 points 8.0 points 4.0 points 6.0 points Key Financials 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E Revenue, MSEK 956 856 849 898 953 Growth -1% -10% -1% 6% 6% EBITDA 113-194 131 154 169 EBITDA margin 12% -23% 15% 17% 18% EBIT 58-242 82 104 141 EBIT margin 6% -28% 10% 12% 15% Pre-tax earnings 34-263 67 88 121 Net earnings 48-276 60 80 110 Net margin 5% -32% 7% 9% 12% Dividend/share 2012 2.00 2013 1.00 2014E 2.01 2015E 2.70 2016E 3.68 EPS adj. 3.22-18.48 4.02 5.40 7.36 P/E adj. 17.40 Neg 15.19 11.30 8.28 EV/S 1.24 0.83 1.29 1.18 1.12 EV/EBITDA 10.49 Neg 8.35 6.88 6.33 Share information Share price (SEK) 61.0 Number of shares (m) 14.9 Market Cap (MSEK) 910 Net debt 2014E (MSEK) 184 Free float (%) 17 % Analysts: Henrik Senestad henrik.senestad@redeye.se Important information: All information regarding limitation of liability and potential conflicts of interest can be found at the end of the report. Redeye, Mäster Samuelsgatan 42, 10tr, Box 7141, 103 87 Stockholm. Tel +46 8-545 013 30. E-post: info@redeye.se

Redeye Rating: Background and definitions The aim of a Redeye Rating is to help investors identify high-quality companies with attractive valuation. Company Qualities The aim of Company Qualities is to provide a well-structured and clear profile of a company s qualities (or operating risk) its chances of surviving and its potential for achieving long-term stable profit growth. We categorize a company s qualities on a ten-point scale based on five valuation keys; 1 Management, 2 Ownership, 3 Growth Outlook, 4 Profitability and 5 Financial Strength. Each valuation key is assessed based a number of quantitative and qualitative key factors that are weighted differently according to how important they are deemed to be. Each key factor is allocated a number of points based on its rating. The assessment of each valuation key is based on the total number of points for these individual factors. The rating scale ranges from 0 to +10 points. Management Our Management rating represents an assessment of the ability of the board of directors and management to manage the company in the best interests of the shareholders. A good board and management can make a mediocre business concept profitable, while a poor board and management can even lead a strong company into crisis. The factors used to assess a company s management are: 1 Execution, 2 Capital allocation, 3 Communication, 4 Experience, 5 Leadership and 6 Integrity. Ownership Our Ownership rating represents an assessment of the ownership exercised for longer-term value creation. Owner commitment and expertise are key to a company s stability and the board s ability to take action. Companies with a dispersed ownership structure without a clear controlling shareholder have historically performed worse than the market index over time. The factors used to assess Ownership are: 1 Ownership structure, 2 Owner commitment, 3 Institutional ownership, 4 Abuse of power, 5 Reputation, and 6 Financial sustainability. Growth Outlook Our Growth Outlook rating represents an assessment of a company s potential to achieve long-term stable profit growth. Over the long-term, the share price roughly mirrors the company s earnings trend. A company that does not grow may be a good short-term investment, but is usually unwise in the long term. The factors used to assess Growth Outlook are: 1 Strategies and business model, 2 Sale potential, 3 Market growth, 4 Market position, and 5 Competitiveness. Profitability Our Profitability rating represents an assessment of how effective a company has historically utilised its capital to generate profit. Companies cannot survive if they are not profitable. The assessment of how profitable a company has been is based on a number of key ratios and criteria over a period of up to the past five years: 1 Return on total assets (ROA), 2 Return on equity (ROE), 3 Net profit margin, 4 Free cash flow, and 5 Operating profit margin or EBIT. Financial Strength Our Financial Strength rating represents an assessment of a company s ability to pay in the short and long term. The core of a company s financial strength is its balance sheet and cash flow. Even the greatest potential is of no benefit unless the balance sheet can cope with funding growth. The assessment of a company s financial strength is based on a number of key ratios and criteria: 1 Times-interest-coverage ratio, 2 Debt-to-equity ratio, 3 Quick ratio, 4 Current ratio, 5 Sales turnover, 6 Capital needs, 7 Cyclicality, and 8 Forthcoming binary events. 2

Public offer On February 14, 2014, Blue Canyon Holdings AB, a company indirectly controlled by GTCR Investment X AIV Ltd., announced a public offer to the shareholders of Cision to transfer all of their shares in the Company to Blue Canyon Holdings for a consideration of SEK 52.00 per share. The public offer has thereafter been increased twice to SEK 55.10 and on April 7, 2014 to SEK 61.00. After this offer, on April 25 Blue Canyon Holdings AB announced they controlled 71.9% of the shares and votes in Cision. On April 3 Meltwater Drive Sverige AB announced a competing offer of SEK 60.00 per share to the shareholders of Cision. The offer was conditional upon an acceptance rate of at least 70% of the shares. On April 16, 2014, Meltwater raised the offer to SEK 63.00 per share with a calculated acceptance period to May 27, 2014. The acceptance rate remained at 70% for this new offer. Meltwater later withdrew this offer on May 16. Since Meltwater holds more than 10 per cent of the company, Blue Canyon Holdings AB cannot exercise a compulsory redemption of the remaining shares in the market. The situation is very complex, and the outcome is somewhat unclear. We asses that Blue Canyon Holdings AB will wait for the bidding rules to run out (12 month), and then try to buy Meltwaters shares to force a compulsory redemption of the remaining outstanding shares. On May 21, the board of directors of Cision has resolved to apply for a delisting of the company s share from NASDAQ OMX Stockholm. No last day of trading in the share has been announced. An application of de-listing, when the minority holds above 10 percent, is very uncommon in Sweden. A de-listing does not necessary mean that the share will stop trading, but rather that the company will move to another alternative smaller list. Our DCF valuation indicates a value for Cision around 45 SEK per share (as a stand-alone company). Our peer valuation indicates that similar companies (in the US) are traded higher than the current market price of 61 SEK per share, which might help to explain the price level for Blue Canyon s public offer. We believe that Cisions shareholders have received an appropriate premium level for their shares in the company at 61 SEK per share. 3

Stable revenue, strong cash flow Cision s Q1 report was in line with expected Cision s Q1 report was overall in line with expectations. Reported revenue amounted to SEK 206 million vs forecasted SEK 208 million. And EBIT amounted to SEK 17 million vs forecasted SEK 17 million. Profit after tax and financials was however a bit stronger than expected due to lower financial costs. There was no FX-effect in the figures which compensated for slightly weaker sales in subscription revenues compared to our forecast. Cision: Estimated vs reported* MSEK Q1'13 Q1'14E Reported Diff 0 0 0 0 0 Revenue 206 208 206-1% EBITDA 32 29 30 1% EBIT 13 17 17-1% EPS, SEK 0,4 0,70 0,74 7% Revenue growth -12,8% 0,6% -0,1% Gross margin 64,5% 67,2% 67,4% EBIT margin 6,1% 8,2% 8,3% EPS growth YoY n/a 85,3% 98,2% *Excluding goodw il impairment and one-timers Source: Redeye Research, Cision Revenue, were stable compared to Q1 last year, which was slightly lower than expected. The unbundling churn from the monitor business has been stabilized and the company had a small but positive organic growth during the quarter. Cision had strong operating cash flow in Q1 Cision had a very strong operating cash flow in Q1 due to positive working capital development as well as underlying EBITDA. Free cash flow amounted to SEK 37 million during the quarter. The positive cash flow development is expected to continue onwards as the prepaid subscription based model gets further traction. 4

North America expected to return to growth second half 2014 Revenues in North America fell by SEK 3 million in Q1 compared with last year. The reason was lower sales in the radio/tv monitoring business. The development of the CAD against the SEK y-o-y has caused a combined negative FX-effect of SEK 2 million. The EBITDA-marginal also fell slightly, to 19 per cent, compared to 20 per cent same period last year. There is also a non-recurring cost for the quarter which amounted to SEK 3 million, regarding an effort of focusing the US production to Chicago. Cision: Development North America MSEK 2012 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 2013 Q1'14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Revenue 773 157 153 153 157 650 154 Organic growth YoY 5,0% -3,0% -9,0% -2,0% 0,0% -3,0% -1,0% FX effect on Revenue 31-8 -9-6 -5-28 -8 EBIT * 134 22 21 13 22 78 22 EBIT % * 17,3% 14,0% 14,0% 8,4% 14,0% 12,6% 14,0% FX effect on EBIT * 5-1 -1 0-1 -3-1 EBITDA* 175 31 30 22 32 115 31 EBITDA %* 22,7% 19,7% 19,6% 14,4% 20,4% 18,5% 20,0% *Excluding goodw il impairment and one-timers Source: Redeye Research, Cision All countries but UK show growth but increased market spend affects margins Cision Europe 4 per cent organic growth Revenues in Europe were SEK 56 million in Q1 and the division reported organic growth of 4 per cent. Operating margin also increased, to 13 per cent, in the quarter, which was mainly related to successful cost reductions in the UK. Similar to North America we expect Europe to increase growth onwards, but we also expect increased marketing focus which will hold back the margin expansion. Cision: Development Europe MSEK 2012 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 2013 Q1'14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Revenue 222 52 53 54 60 219 56 Organic growth YoY 2,0% 1,0% -4,0% 0% 1% 0% 4% FX effect on Revenue -2-2 -2 0 0-3 2 EBIT * 33 4 3 6 6 19 7 EBIT % * 14,9% 8,6% 5,3% 11,1% 9,7% 8,8% 13,0% FX effect on EBIT * -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBITDA 41 6 4 8 7 25 9 EBITDA % 18,7% 11,5% 8,1% 14,8% 11,9% 11,6% 16,0% *Excluding goodw il impairment and one-timers Source: Redeye Research, Cision 5

Estimates We have made only minor changes to our estimates after the Q1 report. We have decreased the level of receivables and the level of gross investments which has increased free cash flow, but it does not affect our earnings estimates. Cision: Detailed estimates MSEK 0 Q4'130 20130 Q1'140 Q2'14E0 Q3'14E0 Q4'14E0 2014E0 2015E0 2016E0 Revenue 213 856 206 211 214 218 847 898 953 EBITDA* 33 121 30 31 35 35 131 154 170 EBIT 13-242 17 19 23 23 82 104 141 PTP 7-263 13 15 20 19 67 88 123 EPS, SEK 0,0-18,5 0,7 0,9 1,2 1,2 4,0 5,4 7,5 Revenue growth -11,3% -10,5% -0,1% -9,7% 5,1% 2,4% -1,1% 6,1% 6,2% Gross margin 67,9% 67,1% 67,4% 67,5% 67,7% 70,0% 84,0% 68,5% 69,0% EBIT% 6,1% -28,2% 8,3% 8,8% 10,9% 10,5% 9,7% 11,6% 14,8% EPS growth (YoY) -98,4% -399,0% 98,2% -60,9% -105,6% n.a. -121,7% 34,4% 38,7% *Excluding goodw il impairment and one-timers 6

Valuation To valuate Cision we have conducted both a discounted cash flow valuation and a peer valuation. DCF valuation We have used a discount rate (Wacc) of 13.0 per cent. For 2014 we have assumed zero sales growth but lower costs, which increases margins. For the future year 2015 to 2022 we have assumed sales growth ranging between 7 to 10 per cent and an EBIT margin between 9 and 13 per cent. We have used a tax rate of 9 per cent until 2018 where the tax is expected to rise to 16 per cent. Our DCF valuation indicates an intrinsic value of around 45 SEK per share (as a standalone going concern). Attractive long term multiples Peer valuation Arriving at a valuation of Cision on a profit after tax/per share basis can be a little misleading because the company can take advantage of a number of tax deductions to reduce its tax bill. Our non-tax-adjusted forecasts puts the P/E multiple for 2014e at 15,2x and 11,3x for 2015e, which is a bit expensive for a company with single digit growth. Adjusted to a normal 22 per cent tax rate the P/E multiple jumps up to 17,2x and 13,2x. Turning our eyes towards the EV/EBITDA, which takes into account the company s net debt (but disregards depreciation, financial costs and tax), the shares are valued at a multiple of 8,4x for 2014e, based on underlying EBITDA, and 6,9x 2015e EBITDA, which is low compared to peers. The table below shows a comparison of US companies that sell SaaS Software as a Service on the Internet: Peer valuation P/E EV/EBITDA EV/S Company 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 CONSTANT CONTACT INC 40,1 28,6 22,8 17,0 13,0 10,5 2,7 2,4 2,1 VOCUS INC 88,9 55,4 44,2 21,4 16,3 14,9 2,3 2,3 2,3 SALESFORCE.COM INC 137,6 154,7 105,9 60,9 45,9 34,0 10,6 8,0 6,1 Mean 88,9 79,6 57,7 33,1 25,1 19,8 5,2 4,2 3,5 Median 88,9 55,4 44,2 21,4 16,3 14,9 2,7 2,4 2,3 CISION AB* 23,0 15,2 11,3 5,9 8,4 6,9 0,8 1,3 1,2 Source: Bloomberg och Redeye Research *Excluding write downs of goodwil and one-timers In addition to the above other comparable companies are ExactTarget, Marin Software and Marketo. Our valuation section shows that Cision is still valued below several of its peers. The relative low valuation compared to peers can be a reason why the American backed Blue Canyon Holdings is so keen in acquiring Cision at a cost above our estimated intrinsic DCFvalue. 7

Summary Redeye Rating The rating consists of five valuation keys, each constituting an overall assessment of several factors that are rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points. The maximum score for a valuation key is 10 points. Management 7.0p The Company's management and board have been replaced in the recent past. The reason for this is that the company's focus was redirected. The current CEO has extensive experience from Cision. CFO and other parts of management are also replaced and it is evident that the focus going forward will be growth. Ownership 4.0p Only few in both board and management have a substantial holding in the company. Furthermore, several institutional shareholders have sold and the ownership situation does not feel convincing stable. We would like to see a new strong owner. Growth prospect 8.0p Cision has a high proportion of recurring revenues and the company has a good chance to succeed in developing their offering in order to achieve good long-term growth. Gross margin is also very high (65-70%) and thus there is good potential for margin expansion. The company also has a very good market position in both North America and the Nordic countries, which are the core markets. Profitability 4.0p The company has had a declining profitability in recent years. Furthermore, Cision has sold off much of the old business. Profitability has declined as the company has transformed the business and we expect no quick recovery. Rather a slow recovery that may also mean additional decline in profitability in the short term. Financial strength 6.0p Cision has a reasonably good financial situation. To a large extent the company uses a prepaid income model, long-term contracts and recurring revenue, making earnings stable. Goodwill in relation to equity is not ultimate, but the last impairment write-down has improved the situation. Further, management says that the remaining goodwill is associated with future business rather than the historically important print monitoring business. 8

Income statement 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E Net sales 956 856 849 898 953 Total operating costs -843-1,050-718 -744-784 EBITDA 113-194 131 154 169 Depreciation -55-47 -49-50 -29 Amortization 0 0 0 0 0 Impairment charges 0 0 0 0 0 EBIT 58-242 82 104 141 Share in profits 0 0 0 0 0 Net financial items -24-22 -15-16 -20 Exchange rate dif. 0 0 0 0 0 Pre-tax profit 34-263 67 88 121 Tax 14-12 -7-8 -11 Net earnings 48-276 60 80 110 Balance 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E Assets Current assets Cash in banks 56 66 116 117 88 Receivables 220 151 140 148 157 Inventories 0 0 0 0 0 Other current assets 0 0 0 0 0 Current assets 276 217 256 265 245 Fixed assets Tangible assets 27 23 14 14 35 Associated comp. 0 0 0 0 0 Investments 38 38 42 42 42 Goodwill 1,335 995 995 995 995 Cap. exp. for dev. 0 0 0 0 0 O intangible rights 76 94 93 99 105 O non-current assets 3 1 1 1 1 Total fixed assets 1,478 1,151 1,145 1,150 1,178 Deferred tax assets 5 3 3 3 3 Total (assets) 1,759 1,370 1,403 1,418 1,425 Liabilities Current liabilities Short-term debt 405 0 0 0 0 Accounts payable 266 292 280 269 238 O current liabilities 0 0 0 5 0 Current liabilities 671 292 280 274 238 Long-term debt 0 300 300 270 250 O long-term liabilities 2 4 4 4 4 Convertibles 0 0 0 0 0 Total Liabilities 672 596 584 548 492 Deferred tax liab 139 146 146 146 140 Provisions 0 0 0 0 0 Shareholders' equity 947 628 673 724 793 Minority interest (BS) 0 0 0 0 0 Minority & equity 947 628 673 724 793 Total liab & SE 1,759 1,370 1,403 1,418 1,425 Free cash flow 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E Net sales 956 856 849 898 953 Total operating costs -843-1,050-718 -744-784 Depreciations total -55-47 -49-50 -29 EBIT 58-242 82 104 141 Taxes on EBIT -9-11 -9-9 -13 NOPLAT 49-253 73 95 128 Depreciation 55 47 49 50 29 Gross cash flow 104-205 122 145 157 Change in WC 35 95-1 -14-45 Gross CAPEX 49 280-43 -55-56 Free cash flow 188 170 78 76 55 DCF valuation Cash flow, MSEK Risk premium (%) 7.0 % NPV FCF (2013-2015) 169 Beta 1.5 NPV FCF (2016-2022) 344 Risk-free rate (%) 3.0 % NPV FCF (2023-) 403 Interest premium 9.0 % Non-operating assets 51 WACC (%) 13.0 % Interest-bearing debt -300 Fair value estimate MSEK 668 Assumptions 2015-2021 (%) Average sales growth 8.1 % Fair value e. per share, SEK 45 EBIT margin 11.0 % Share price, SEK 61.0 Profitability 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E ROE 5% -35% 9% 12% 14% ROCE 4% -21% 9% 11% 14% ROIC 3% -20% 8% 11% 15% EBITDA margin 12% -23% 15% 17% 18% EBIT margin 6% -28% 10% 12% 15% Net margin 5% -32% 7% 9% 12% Data per share 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E EPS 3.22-18.48 4.02 5.40 7.36 EPS adj 3.22-18.48 4.02 5.40 7.36 Dividend 2.00 1.00 2.01 2.70 3.68 Net debt 23.41 15.69 12.35 10.25 10.87 Total shares 14.91 14.91 14.91 14.91 14.91 Valuation 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E EV 1,184.1 711.1 1,093.6 1,062.3 1,071.6 P/E 17.4-1.7 15.2 11.3 8.3 P/E diluted 17.4-1.7 15.2 11.3 8.3 P/Sales 0.9 0.6 1.1 1.0 1.0 EV/Sales 1.2 0.8 1.3 1.2 1.1 EV/EBITDA 10.5-3.7 8.4 6.9 6.3 EV/EBIT 20.5-2.9 13.4 10.2 7.6 P/BV 0.9 0.8 1.4 1.3 1.1 Share performance Growth/year 12/14e 1 month 3.0 % Net sales -5.80 % 3 month 90.6 % Operating profit adj 18.9 % 12 month 35.6 % EPS, just 11.7 % Since start of the year 77.8 % Equity -15.7 % Share information Reuters code CSN.ST List Small Cap Share price 61.0 Total shares, million 14.9 Market Cap, MSEK 909.5 Management & board CEO CFO IR Chairman Financial information Peter Granat Charlotte Hansson Peter Granat Hans-Erik Andersson Capital structure 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E Equity ratio 54% 46% 48% 51% 56% Debt/equity ratio 43% 48% 45% 37% 32% Net debt 349 235 184 153 162 Capital employed 1,296 862 857 876 955 Capital turnover rate 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 Analyst Henrik Senestad henrik.senestad@redeye.se Redeye AB Mäster Samuelsgatan 42, 10tr 111 57 Stockholm Growth 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E Sales growth -1% -10% -1% 6% 6% EPS growth (adj) -44% -674% -122% 34% 36% 9

Revenue & Growth (%) EBIT (adjusted) & Margin (%) 980 960 940 920 900 880 860 840 820 800 780 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E 10,0% 5,0% 0,0% -5,0% -10,0% -15,0% -20,0% 200 150 100 50 0-50 -100-150 -200-250 -300 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E 20,0% 15,0% 10,0% 5,0% 0,0% -5,0% -10,0% -15,0% -20,0% -25,0% -30,0% -35,0% Net sales Net sales growth EBIT adj EBIT margin Earnings per share Equity & debt-equity ratio (%) 10 10 0,6 60,0% 5 5 0,5 50,0% 0-5 -10-15 -20 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E 0-5 -10-15 -20 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E 40,0% 30,0% 20,0% 10,0% 0,0% EPS, unadjusted EPS, adjusted Equity ratio Debt-equity ratio Sales division Geographical areas Subscription Transactional Professional Services North America Europé Conflict of interests Henrik Senestad owns shares in the company: No Redeye performs/have performed services for the Company and receives/have received compensation from the Company in connection with this. 10

DISCLAIMER Important information Redeye AB ("Redeye" or "the Company") is a specialist investment banking boutique that focuses on small and mid-cap growth companies in the Nordic region. We focus on the IT, life sciences, media, betting, clean tech and commodities sectors. We provide services within Corporate Broking, Corporate Finance, equity research, investor relations and media services. Our strengths are our award-winning research and analysis department, experienced advisers, a unique investor network, and powerful distribution channel redeye.se. Redeye was founded in 1999 and since 2007 has been subject to the supervision of the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority. Redeye is licensed to; receive and transmit orders in financial instruments, provide investment advice to clients regarding financial instruments, prepare and disseminate financial analyses/recommendations for trading in financial instruments, execute orders in financial instruments on behalf of clients, place financial instruments without position taking, provide for the safekeeping of financial instruments, accept funds with accounting responsibility, provide corporate advice and services within mergers and acquisition, provide services in conjunction with the provision of guarantees regarding financial instruments and to operate as a Certified Advisory business (ancillary authorization). Limitation of liability This document was prepared for information purposes for general distribution and is not intended to be advisory. The information contained in this analysis is based on sources deemed reliable by Redeye. However, Redeye cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information. The forward-looking information in the analysis is based on subjective assessments about the future, which constitutes a factor of uncertainty. Redeye cannot guarantee that forecasts and forward-looking statements will materialize. Investors take all investment decisions independently. This analysis is intended to be one of a number of tools that can be used in making an investment decision. All investors are therefore encouraged to supplement this information with additional relevant data and to consult a financial advisor prior to an investment decision. Accordingly, Redeye accepts no liability for any loss or damage resulting from the use of this analysis. Potential conflict of interest Redeye s research department is regulated by organisational and administrative rules established to avoid conflicts of interest and to ensure the objectivity and independence of its analysts. The following applies: For companies that are the subject of Redeye s research analysis, the applicable rules include those established by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority pertaining to investment recommendations and the handling of conflicts of interest. Furthermore, Redeye employees are not allowed to trade in financial instruments of the company in question, effective from the day that the decision is taken to produce a research analysis on the company and the two banking days after the report is published. An analyst may not engage in corporate finance transactions without the express approval of management, and may not receive any remuneration directly linked to such transactions. Redeye may carry out an analysis upon commission or in exchange for payment from the company that is the subject of the analysis, or from an underwriting institution in conjunction with a merger and acquisition (M&A) deal, new share issue or a public listing. Readers of these reports should assume that Redeye may have received or will receive remuneration from the company/companies cited in the report for the performance of financial advisory services. Such remuneration is of a predetermined amount and is not dependent on the content of the analysis. Redeye s research coverage Redeye s research analyses consist of case-based analyses, which implies that the frequency of the analytical reports may vary over time. Unless otherwise expressly stated in the report, the analysis is updated when considered necessary by the research department, for example in the event of significant changes in market conditions or events related to the issuer/the financial instrument. Recommendation structure Redeye does not issue any investment recommendations for fundamental analysis. However, Redeye has developed a proprietary analysis and rating model, Redeye Rating, in which each company is analysed and evaluated. This analysis aims to provide an independent assessment of the company in question, its opportunities, risks, etc. The purpose is to provide an objective and professional set of data for owners and investors to use in their decisionmaking. Redeye s recommendations for technical analyses are: Buy (Köp) and Sell (Sälj). The investment horizon for these recommendations is very short, at usually less than 1 month. Redeye Rating (2013-12-12) Rating Management Ownership Growth Prospect Profitability Financial Strength 7,5p - 10,0p 18 14 8 9 16 3,5p - 7,0p 39 46 27 41 41 0,0p - 3,0p 9 6 31 16 9 Company N 66 66 66 66 66 Duplication and distribution This document may not be duplicated, reproduced or copied for purposes other than personal use. The document may not be distributed to physical or legal entities that are citizens of or domiciled in any country in which such distribution is prohibited according to applicable laws or other regulations. Copyright Redeye AB. 11