2007 Environmental Statement Period Covered: January 1 to December 31, 2007 Revision Date: March 14, Fort Saskatchewan

Similar documents
BP Texas City Refinery

Fujitsu Group s Environmental Management: Outline of Environmental Protection Program (Stage IV)

IMPLEMENTING ISO 14001:

Health, Safety and Environment Policy

Table of Contents INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL

June 2010 HEALTH, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (HSEMS)

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

CSX Public Safety, Health, and Environmental Management System

Canada Strategic Performance Unit Gas Operations. Verified Site Report: 2008

ISO 14001: White Paper on the Changes to the ISO Standard on Environmental Management Systems JULY 2015

Identifying Environmental Aspects

Environmental Policy

Navigating ISO 14001:2015

Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

15 Guiding Principles

COMPANY NAME. Environmental Management System Manual

CSA Group Safety Standards for Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems: A Life-Cycle Approach

HP SUPPLIER ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

Shell s Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) management system (see Figure 11-1) provides the framework for managing all aspects of the development.

UBS Grass Roots Conference

Instrument Gas to Instrument Air Conversion Protocol October 2009 SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION OCTOBER Version 1.0.

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

HUGO BOSS ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT. Our claim. Our approach

13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description

HEALTH SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

GHG data management issues in an Oil Company. Maria Mantini, Corporate HSE Leonardo Gelpi, Corporate M2M Oil & Gas Session New Delhi, 4 th March 2010

Health & Safety Management System Manual

ISO 14001:2004 EMS Internal Audit Checklist & Gap Analysis

COVER: to be inserted. APIA Industry Guideline for Effective Auditing and Enhanced HSE Performance

Business Principles September 2014

The Canada GTL Project

Environmental Management Plan

Canadian Oil Sands. Enhancing America s Energy Security

Health, Safety and Environment Management System

VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODEL MANUAL

POLLUTION INCIDENT RESPONSE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Scope 1 describes direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources that are owned by or under the direct control of the reporting entity;

Green Procurement Guidelines. Aerospace Company

Fixing the Leaks: What Would it Cost to Clean Up Natural Gas Leaks?

N O T E S. Environmental Forensics. Identification of Natural Gas Sources using Geochemical Forensic Tools. Dispute Scenarios

CHAPTER 24: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Garry Kaufman Colorado Air Pollution Control Division May 14, 2014

BEST PRACTICES IN LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR (LDAR) PROGRAMS. November 06, 2014 By: François Thibodeau, Eng.

BS EN Energy Management Systems VICTORIA BARRON, PRODUCT MARKETING MANAGER, BSI

Policy on Safety, Security, Health and Environmental Protection (SHE) in the Roche Group Edition

Environmental Management System Tool

ALLIED PRINTING SERVICES, INC. CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT

SHE Standards. Safety, Health and Environmental Protection Standards

OUR CONVERSATION TODAY

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ISO-14001:2004 POLICY MANUAL

London Underground Environment Strategy

Environmental System Manual ISO14001:2004E

Incident Reporting Requirements

Win the energy challenge with ISO ISO energy management

Eni experience and research with IR video-camera imaging

May Duke Energy EHSMS Manual. Environmental, Health and Safety Management System Manual

Environmental Protection: Environmental Protection Policies, Programs and Procedures REGDOC-2.9.1

Contact: Environment and Green Technologies Department Phone:

OUR CODE OF ETHICS. June 2013

Health, Security, Safety and Environment (HSE)

Environmental nonconformity, corrective & preventive action

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL IMS. Based on ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 14001:2004 Standards

Controlling fire and explosion risks in the workplace

Institut für angewandtes Stoffstrommanagement (IfaS) Competive Innovation

10. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

ISO Environmental Management Systems

Understanding Principles and Concepts of Quality, Safety and Environmental Management System Graham Caddies

Proposed (Concrete Cutting And Drilling) Environmental Management Plan

City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department. Wastewater EMS Manual

Business Management System Manual. Context, Scope and Responsibilities

Woodfibre Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project. Review of Related Upstream Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Estimates

TSM ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL

Air Quality Regulation of the Oil and Gas Production Sector in Colorado and Beyond. Garry Kaufman Holland & Hart LLP

Sydney Port Botany Terminal 3 Project Water Resource Management Plan

An introduction to the Sustainable Biomass Partnership

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT POLICY MANUAL

R000. Revision Summary Revision Number Date Description of Revisions R000 Feb. 18, 2011 Initial issue of the document.

Energy Efficiency Opportunities

CAT CG132. Series Gas Generator Sets

Environmental Management Systems in Hotels. 15 Steps to the Successful Implementation of an Environmental Management System in a Hotel

Example of a (safety) management system

Mining Supply Chain Forum, April 06, 2014 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

Procurement Services Branch

ChevronTexaco Corporate Energy and GHG Inventory System: SANGEA

Natural Gas: A Cleaner Energy Solution or Just Another Fossil Fuel?

CANADIAN WESTERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY LIMITED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol

Carbon Credits: An Opportunity for Forest Landowners. Hughes Simpson Texas Forest Service

Reducing CO2 emissions for Offshore oil and gas Operations under ETS. Margaret Christie, Environmental Advisor, UK Business Unit, Premier Oil UK Ltd

Slides prepared by the Northeast Gas Association

Independent review of selected Subject Matter contained in Macquarie Group Limited s 2016 Annual Report

Sierra Army Depot ISO Environmental Management System (EMS) Awareness Training. ~ protecting our environment is. everyone s responsibility ~

Natural gas liquids recovery from gas turbine fuel

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR SCOPING OF EIA STUDY

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

HSE Management System Standard

Singapore Exchange Sustainability Reporting Guide. Guide to Sustainability Reporting for Listed Companies

IEMA The Importance of Due Diligence Auditing in the transition to a Sustainable Economy Mark Thompson 9 December 2014

Oil Spill Emergency Response. Oil Spill Emergency

Transcription:

2007 Environmental Statement Period Covered: January 1 to December 31, 2007 Revision Date: March 14, 2008 Fort Saskatchewan 1

Foreword: Our HSE Policy Natural Gas Liquids Business Unit Health Safety and Environmental Policy The North American Natural Gas Liquids Business Unit (NGL BU) is committed to Health, Safety and the Environment (HSE). Effective HSE performance and the security of each person are crucial to the success of our business. Our goals are simply stated - no accidents, no harm to people and no damage to the environment. Prevention of pollution, management of natural resources for sustainability, and continual improvement are vital components and key to our success. We will set and review objectives and measurable targets for our operational units as a part of continual improvement. Driving down the HSE impacts of our operations by reducing waste, air emissions and discharges, using energy efficiently, and assuring a safe work environment for our employees is a priority. We are committed to: comply with relevant legislation and other requirements to which the Natural Gas Liquids Business Units subscribes; consult, listen and respond openly to customers, employees, neighbors, public interest groups and those who work with us; work with others - partners, suppliers, competitors and regulators - to raise the HSE standards of our industry; openly report our HSE performance, good and bad; and recognize those who contribute to improved HSE performance. Management and employees are committed to this HSE policy. Issue Date: April 09, 2001 Revision Log: February 5, 2004 2

BP Fort Saskatchewan Management Statement This report is our third environmental statement. The report describes the BP Fort Saskatchewan operations, environmental performance and the actions we are taking to deliver on our non-financial business policies. Introduction to the Fort Saskatchewan Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Our environmental objectives aim to meet or exceed environmental laws/regulations and minimize our impacts through structured internal targets and environmental management programs. We integrate Environmental Management Systems (EMS) that assist in defining compliance and operating requirements. EMS furthers our conformance assurance with our environmental policies, demonstrates effective environmental management to others and promotes continual improvement. The foundation for these management systems stems from three sets of guidelines: BP s Getting HSE Right (GHSER), Getting Health Right (GHR) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001. GHSER and GHR are frameworks designed to reinforce BP s corporate policy and expectations regarding HSE performance. Thirteen elements of BP HSE Management Systems Framework 1. Leadership and accountability 2. Risk assessment and management 3. People training and behaviors 4. Working with contractors and others 5. Facilities design and construction 6. Operations and maintenance 7. Management of change 8. Information and documentation 9. Customers and products 10. Community and stakeholder awareness 11. Crisis and emergency management 12. Incidents analysis and prevention 13. Assessment, assurance and improvement 3

ISO 14000 The ISO 14000 series is a family of environmental management standards developed by the international Organization for Standardization (ISO), one of the world s principal voluntary standards development bodies. ISO 14001-2004 aims to support environmental protection and prevention of pollution in balance with socioeconomic needs. It effectively encourages environmental management at all operational levels, and broadens the scope of awareness. The ISO 14000 series of standards are designed to provide an internationally recognized system for environmental management, measurement, evaluation and auditing. ISO should be used as a tool to enhance a company s control and assessment surrounding the environmental impact of their activities, products or services. The BP Fort Saskatchewan Facility is currently ISO 14001 registered and will undergo a recertification audit to ISO 14001-2004 in 2008. Defined as an expectation in Getting Health Safety and Environment Right (GHSER), the NGLBU is striving to have all major assets registered. 4

PRINCIPLE ELEMENTS OF AN ISO 14001 EMS ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Ensures that top management defines the organization s intention and commitment to environmental performance PLAN Analyses the environmental impacts and aspects of the activities and operations. Considers the governing legal and external requirements Establishes and identifies the site s objectives and targets Illustrates the scope of relevant Environmental Management Programs DO Defines roles and responsibilities FUNDAMENTAL ISO 14001 CONCEPT Continual Improvement Environmental Policy Ensures training, awareness and competence Communicates internally and externally ACT PLAN Environmental Management System documentation Establishes operational controls CHECK Monitor and measure performance Handle and investigate nonconformance, including corrective or preventative action Maintain procedures for handling environmental records CHECK DO Corrective Action Implement & Operate Carry out periodic audits ACT Conduct periodic management review of EMS effectiveness Identify progress achieved towards objectives, targets and continual improvement efforts 5

Description of our operations The NGLBU has approximately 790 employees facilitating with extraction, fractionation, storage, transportation, and gas processing operations throughout North America. It is organized into regional Performance Units: North and South. We are committed to constructive, innovative and proactive solutions to the growing need for energy. We aim to uphold the integrity and accountability that enables us to bring positive change. We believe that, wherever we operate, our activities should generate economic benefits and opportunities for an enhanced quality of life for those whom our business impacts; that our conduct should be a positive influence; that our relationships should be honest and open; and that we should be held accountable for our actions. NGLBU Philosophy, www.ngl.com, 2004 Our HSE objectives The Natural Gas Liquids Business Unit (NGLBU) actively pursues continual improvement in all facets of its operations and facilities. We believe that our performance efforts in conjunction with our goals of no accidents, no harm to people and no damage to the environment will bring us success and integrity in business. Our environmental impacts are identified through the collective efforts of regulatory, HSE, and field personnel. The BP Group enhances this endeavor with its internal policies, processes and environmental protocols. Identification of existing environmental impacts is paramount in the chain of shared learnings. Elevated standards ensure that all facilities adequately measure, report and reflect their environmental impacts appropriately. The NGLBU seeks to minimize the impact of our activities on the environment by reducing our environmental discharges, including wastes and emissions, and optimizing our energy consumption. Through processes and auditing we are able to identify key areas requiring continuous improvements. We assertively encourage prevention of pollution and treatment of existing contamination, as well as, targeting overall reduction of our discharges, spills and emissions. We aim to be in absolute compliance with all environmental laws, regulations, and permits, respecting the environment and taking responsibility for our role in it. To achieve the highest level of HSE performance, specifically environmental performance, we aim for continual improvement in all that we do. Through regulations, internal guidelines, sharing best practices, encouraging green technologies, and aspiring to more stringent targets we can consistently enhance our productivity without deviating from our commitment of no damage to the environment. 6

FORT SASKATCHEWAN STORAGE & FRACTIONATION FACILITY BACKGROUND The BP Canada operated Fort Saskatchewan Storage and Fractionation Facility was originally built in 1973 as a storage terminal for natural gas liquids ( NGL ). Requiring a solution-mined hydrocarbon storage cavern, this region was considered for its geologic attributes and its centrality. The combination of large, naturally occurring salt formations and the accessibility to the North Saskatchewan River provided the optimal conditions. Aerial View of the Fort Saskatchewan Facility Over the course of its history, the facility has expanded its processing capabilities. In 1980, the facility started fractionating NGL. Since then, the facility has added other processing units that dry, treat and refine the various NGL components. Today, the facility is an integrated product system where NGL received at the site is stored in caverns, fractionated, treated, and dried for shipment to regions in central Canada and the Midwest United States. Products can be distributed in batches through two key pipeline systems, Cochin and Enbridge, to central Canada and the Midwest United States. This facility also marks the termination points to the Alberta Ethane Gathering System (AEGS) and the Cochrane-Edmonton (Co-Ed) pipeline. The facility currently has approximately 85 full time employees and contractors. LOCATION The Fort Saskatchewan process and storage facility is situated 25 km northeast of Edmonton, Alberta. It is situated on the east bank of the North Sask. River. PROCESS The principle units are the fractionation plant, the CO 2 removal plant (mothballed in 2Q2007), the NGL sweetening unit (mothballed), the butane molecular sieve unit, the C 2 C 3, NGL, brine systems, and finally the core pipeline control centers. These systems have been expanded numerous times since the original plant construction. STORAGE Ten caverns, formed by solution mining of the 6000 ft. deep Lotsburg Salt Formation, are used to store incoming hydrocarbons and processed NGL products (i.e. ethane and propane). Brine is stored in one of four brine ponds and is used when charging and discharging a cavern. COMMITMENT Throughout the history of this facility the safety of both the staff and public at large including environmental protection, has been the first priority. The Fort Saskatchewan personnel have used, and developed safe, reliable operating and maintenance procedures, as well as, a world class ISO 14001 registered EMS management system. 7

FORT SASKATCHEWAN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES During 2007 the Fort Saskatchewan facility has focused it s efforts in reducing their environmental impact in four areas: 1) Depletion of natural resources fresh water, 2) Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, 3) Contamination of soil and groundwater with brine, and 4) Degradation of local air quality and potential contribution to global warming due to non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) and other fugitive emissions. DEPLETION OF NATURAL RESOURCES FRESH WATER To reduce our consumption of fresh water we installed a brine transfer pipeline between ourselves and a neighboring facility. By coordinating the transfer of brine between the two facilities we are able to reduce fresh water volumes for brine make-up. The total volume of brine sent to the neighboring facility for 2007 was 205,527 M3 of brine. REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The Fort Saskatchewan facility acknowledges the combustion of fuel gas, flaring and the production of electricity create green house gas emissions and have identified GHG emissions as a significant environmental impact. To reduce indirect GHG emissions we are in the process of replacing current NGL pumps with new centrifugal pumps and a variable frequency drive to reduce electrical consumption. Completion is anticipated in 2Q 2008. In addition we have installed an acoustic wireless network to be able to more quickly indentify and control release locations within our flare system. CONTAMINATION OF SOIL AND GROUND WATER WITH BRINE Action plan in place to evaluate the feasibility of developing a hydrovac dewatering and tailings handling system which would potentially allow tailings re-use and mitigate contamination from spreading onsite. DEGRADATION OF LOCAL AIR QUALITY AND POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBAL WARMING DUE TO NMHC AND OTHER FUGITIVE EMISSIONS We have refurbished both air assisted flare stacks during the September 2007 plant turnaround to improve combustion effectiveness and reduce the likelihood of uncombusted gas being released during flaring. In addition we contracted a specialized infrared camera able to detect otherwise invisible fugitive emissions. Several such emissions from process equipment leaks were detected and repaired. 8

Contact Information If you require more information regarding this report or have any questions please contact John Sundquist at (780) 992-2723. Glossary NGLBU GHG HSSE AEGS Natural Gas Liquids Business Unit Greenhouse Gases Health, Safety, Security and Environment Alberta Ethane Gathering System 9

QMI-SAI Global 20 Carlson Court, Suite 100 Toronto, Ontario M9W 7K6 Canada Telephone: (416) 401-8700 Fax: (416) 401-8650 QMI-SAI GLOBAL VERIFICATION STATEMENT BP Canada Energy Company File No. 012206-05 P.O. Box 3210, Range Road 221 Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta T8L 2T2 Canada In 2008, QMI-SAI Global was commissioned to undertake independent verification of the data provided in the 2007 Environmental Statement for the Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta site of BP Canada Energy Company. Data verification activities included sampling of information and data in the 2007 Environmental Statement. Ultimately, the report as well as the environmental performance at the Fort Saskatchewan site remains the responsibility of the BP Canada Energy Company. The verification process consisted of reviews of documentation provided by BP, a site visit and discussions with site management and site personnel. QMI-SAI Global used an internal protocol, a location specific verification plan and a QMI-SAI Global External Verification of Reports checklist to perform the verification activities. Based on reviewing the information provided by BP, QMI-SAI Global is of the opinion that the data presented in the BP Canada Energy Company environmental statement accurately reflects the observations made during QMI-SAI Global's on-site verification activities as described above at the BP Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta facility during the February 29, 2008 on-site verification procedure. QMI-SAI Global Wendy Tilford Date: May 26, 2008 President, QMI-SAI Global