MACRA IS ON. The countdown to LET S TEAM UP. MACRA Act of 2015 white paper. Introduction. SGR Repeal. Section 101

Similar documents
SGR Repeal: What Are the Implications to Academic Medicine? Len Marquez Mary Wheatley April 17, 2015

Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Repeal and Replace: Comparison of 2014 and 2015 Legislation

SGR Repeal and Medicare Provider Payment Modernization Act of 2015: Timeline of Implementation

5/19/2016 MIPS AND MACRA: MAKING SENSE OF THE NEW REGULATIONS AND PAYMENT SYSTEMS. No Disclosures AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and Alternative Payment Model Provisions

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) Summary of SGR Repeal and Replacement Provisions

MACRA Overview and RFI

MIPS. ACR Issues Analysis of Proposed MACRA MIPS Rule

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program

SUMMARY OF HEALTH IT AND HEALTH DATA PROVISIONS OF H.R. 2, THE MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA)

CMS is requesting information to aid in the planning and implementation of the MIPS in the following areas:

Repeal the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR), avoiding annual double digit payment cuts;

CMS Listening Session: Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)

MACRA: Medicare's Shift to Value-based Delivery & Payment Models. Presented by Amy Mullins, MD, CPE, FAAFP

MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY

A MACRA Overview. A web discussion with guests Ivy Baer, Gayle Lee, and Tanvi Mehta of AAMC

Changes for Calendar Year 2015 Physician Quality Programs and Other Programs in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

EHR Incentive Programs in 2010 & Beyond

Transforming Healthcare through Data-Driven Solutions. Pay for Performance Solutions

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 H.R. 2

MIPS Performance Scoring: Understanding How CMS Proposes to Calculate Performance Is Key to Preparing for MIPS Participation

Overview of the EHR Incentive Programs and Merit-Based Incentive Payment System

Meaningful Use: Stage 3 and Beyond

The ABCs of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA)

Frequently Asked Questions: Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Payment Program

Reporting Once for 2014 Medicare Quality Reporting Programs

Chronic Care Management (CCM) from a Physician Practice Administrator s Perspective

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), H.R. 2, Pub. Law

Key Information. QP or Partial QP Determination

STATEMENT OF ACHIEVING THE PROMISE OF HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR & PENSIONS

MACRA & APMs: More than Acronyms June 2, 2016

MACRA: Looking Ahead - Implications Across the Care Continuum. May 16, 2016/ 12:00-1:00 PM EST

Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

June 27, Dear Mr. Slavitt:

Fiscal Year 2016 proposed Inpatient and Long-term Care Hospital policy and payment changes (CMS-1632-P)

Adding Value to. Provider Compensation. June 13, Healthcare Strategy Group OHA Presentation Adding Value to. Physician Compensation

Calendar Year 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule

Implications for I/T/U

CMS s framework for Value Modifier

What is the Meaning of Meaningful Use? How to Decode the Opportunities and Risks in Health Information Technology

CMS QCDR (Qualified Clinical Data Registry) and Other Ways PPRNet Can Help with Value-Based Payment

Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) Proposed Rule Summary March 31, 2011

Medicare Program; Request for Information Regarding Implementation of the Merit

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

The Meaningful Use Stage 2 Final Rule: Overview and Outlook

Understanding Meaningful Use. Review of Part 1 and Part 2

Section by Section Summary of The SGR Repeal and Medicare Beneficiary Access Improvement Act of 2013

PHOTO HERE. Monarch Pioneer ACO: Designing and Implementing a Successful Shared Risk Model

Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program

Advancing Risk Capability in 2015: MACRA and 2016 Medicare Proposed Rule. May 26, 2015 // 12:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M. EST

MU Objectives and Measures, by Stage. Bold = Core; Non-bold = Menu Red = Change to Stage 1 Criteria

Overview of Physician Payment System Reforms in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (H.R. 2)

Navigating CMS Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals Why It Matters and What You Need to Know. Dr. Paul Mulhausen, CMO

Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheet for Eligible Professionals

Summary of payment provisions within the 2015 proposed Medicare physician fee schedule

Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) What are CQMs?

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Public Health Clients

LOOKING FORWARD TO STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE Louisiana HIPAA & EHR Conference Presenter: Kathleen Keeley

Basis and Purpose Definitions Application Eligibility... 11

Report to Congress on the Application of EHR Payment Incentives for Providers Not Receiving Other Incentive Payments

TABLE 1: STAGE OF MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA BY FIRST PAYMENT YEAR

Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)

CMS Perspectives on Transparency and The Use of Data to Drive Patient Centered Care

Re: Request for Information Regarding Assessing Interoperability for MACRA

Mount Sinai Care: A Medicare Shared Savings Program Primer. Brett Bernstein, MD, AGAF, FASGE Medical Director, Provider Partners of Mount Sinai IPA

Medicare Final Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Regulations Effective January 1, 2012 Median Savings of $470 Million over 4 Years

Department of Social Services. South Dakota Medicaid Division of Medical Services (MS)

Crosswalk of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (H.R. 2) April 21, 2015

How to Report Once for 2015 Medicare Quality Reporting Programs: Individual Eligible Professionals

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; EHR Incentive Programs

2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule Summary

Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheet for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: March 2014

UPDATE ON THE ADOPTION OF HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND RELATED EFFORTS TO FACILITATE THE ELECTRONIC USE AND EXCHANGE OF HEALTH INFORMATION

HCCN Meaningful Use Review. October 7 th, 2015 Louisiana Public Health Institute Kelly Maggiore Jack Millaway

EHRs and the Meaningful Use Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Marlene Hodges Senior Health IT Advisor

Health Information Technology (IT) Simplified

Stage 2 Public Health Core Objective. Eligible Professionals

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program- Stage 3, CMS-3310-P

Re: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 3 (CMS-3310-P)

Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

CMS FINALIZES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Mark Anderson, FHIMSS, CPHIMSS Healthcare IT Futurist

MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVES PROGRAM Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) For Eligible Professionals

Three Proposed Rules on EHRs:

President Obama Signs the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of New Law Includes Physician Update Fix through February

Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now

Department of Health and Human Services. Part III

Federal and State Health Care Policy Status Report

Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) and the NC Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

February 24, 2012 (202) CMS PROPOSES DEFINITION OF STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) TECHNOLOGY

10/19/2015. Meaningful Use: Current and Future Environment. Agenda. MGMA Annual Conference Nashville, TN October 13, 2015

The Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) and Medicare Physician Payments: Frequently Asked Questions

The Impact of Changing Federal Policies on Physician Reimbursement

( File # CMS

Health System Transformation Post Affordable Care Act

JULY 2010 FINAL RULE. Medicare & Medicaid Programs Electronic Health Record Incentive Program as it Applies to Physicians

3/9/2011 ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS: A NATIONAL PRIORITY. Mandate for electronic health records is tied to:

DETAILED SUMMARY--MEDCIARE SHARED SAVINGS/ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION (ACO) PROGRAM

Transcription:

LET S TEAM UP. The countdown to MACRA IS ON. LF SS 2B 3B 1B P C CF RF MACRA Act of 2015 white paper Introduction On April 14 2015, the Senate acted to pass the 2015 Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act which the House passed earlier in March. While the Act is primarily regarded as the Sustainable Growth Rate fix or repeal, it also contains a number of other significant provisions for reform of physician payment under the Medicare program, for promoting alternative payment models for physician participation and related to certified electronic health record technology or CEHRT. The following is a summary of key provisions of interest based on policy areas impacting physician payment, CEHRT and other items of high interest. Section 101 Section 101 of the Act contains most of the more compelling provisions regarding the SGR repeal and the enactment of the Merit Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) which serves to consolidate several of the value based programs that were enacted under ARRA HITECH 2009 and the Affordable Care Act of 2010. SGR Repeal The Act repeals the SGR and replaces it with a moderate set of payment increases well out into the foreseeable future. The repeal of the SGR is to be effective retroactive to 1/1/15, and the schedule of physician fee schedule adjustment factors over the next number of years for Medicare Part B Fee For Service (FFS) set as follows for service dates that fall within: 1/1/15-6/30/15 0.0% 7/1/15-12/31/15 0.5% CY 2016 through CY 2018 0.5% CY 2019 through CY 2025 0.0% After CY 2025 The update will be comprised of two parts For services provided that do not fall under qualifying Alternative Payment Models (APMs) conversion factor 0.25% For services provided that do fall under qualifying APMs conversion factor 0.75%

MIPS and APM Participation MIPS MIPS serves to consolidate the payment adjustments that accrue under the following programs into one composite payment adjustment for Medicare. Meaningful use payment adjustment PQRS Incentive program Physician value based payment modifier Instead of separate payment adjustments under each of these programs, their requirements will be consolidated into MIPS. MIPS will go into effect for payment years starting with CY 2019. MIPS will have four dimensions with an overall composite score from 0-100 for each participating physician. Non-participation in a given dimension will result in a 0 being assigned to performance score for the weight of that category. The categories and their weights as defined under the Act are as follows (NOTE: Given that there is potential for adjustment of the weights for certain categories, the weights defined by the statute do not necessarily add up to 100% as stated): Quality Domain weight of 30% with possible increase in actual score in 2019 and 2020 for the percentage of attainment to be increased by the relative improvement made year over year if the attainment is otherwise less than 30% by actual performance Reporting of quality measures similar to current reporting under PQRS with an emphasis on outcome based measures over time Resource Use Domain weight in 2019 and 2020 of 10% increasing to 15% after that Measurement of resource utilization for beneficiaries including the cost of drugs under Part D Clinical Practice Improvement Activities Domain weight of 15% Expanded practice access like same day appointments for urgent needs and afterhours access to clinicians Population management including monitoring of health conditions to provide timely health care intervention or participation in a qualified clinical data registry (same concept as defined for PQRS) Care coordination including timely communication of test results, timely exchange of clinical information and use of remote monitoring or tele health Beneficiary engagement including establishing care plans for individuals with complex care needs, beneficiary self -management assessment and training and shared decision making Patient safety and practice assessment including through use of clinical or surgical checklists and practice assessments for certification purposes Participation in alternative payment models including medical homes, ACOs or shared savings initiatives Meaningful Use Domain weight of 25% with possible adjustment downwards or upwards depending on the overall percentage of EPs reporting meaningful use Continuing to successfully attest to being a meaningful user Participants in MIPS in 2019 and 2020 are defined much the same way as they are for current PQRS and value based payment modifier participation in that it will apply to physicians, physician assistances, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, CRNAs and after that, for what other eligible professionals the Secretary determines to include. There are provisions for eligible professionals to be able to participate as a group practice similar to how they may be evaluated for PQRS participation. Defined as including

Payment adjustment will be determined based on the overall composite score of an EP, and that will be set based on the comparison of the composite score to performance standards set by the Secretary. As mentioned above, the composite score will be set on a scale of 0 to 100. Participants will be encouraged to report for each of the four dimensions in the following manner For reportable activities under the four dimensions, failure to report will result in the lowest potential score applicable to the given activity For use of CEHRT and qualified clinical data registries for report of quality measures, use of either will be taken to have satisfied the quality measure reporting requirement of MIPS For clinical practice improvement activities, o Participating in a practice certification as a patient centered medical home will result in the maximum score assigned for the clinical practice improvement dimension Participation in an APM will result in automatic assignment of half of the maximum potential score for the clinical practice improvement dimension Greater scoring may be assigned for a given dimension based on a provider making improvement year over year for quality Participants in MIPS will be evaluated based on performance standards set for median performance with distinct performance thresholds set for what is considered significant performance above median or below median. Payment adjustment will be based on the overall composite score. The amount of the payment adjustment as a percentage will be based on a sliding scale but maximum positive or negative adjustments are set as follows with budget neutrality supported for the effect of the payment adjustments for total positive or negative payment adjustment program wide: 2022 and beyond 9% NOTE: An additional bonus is possible for exceptional performance that is at least at the 25th percentile above the median performance threshold on an absolute scale or based on improvement from the prior year. The total amount of additional incentive program wide will be capped at $500m for the years 2019-2024. APM For EPs participating in an APM, the Act also provides for an added incentive for that participation in the form of a 5% bonus over and above what the EP would be otherwise paid for services provided through the APM participation. The bonus would be calculated based on the total value of professional services provided in aggregate under the APM in the prior year by that EP. To be considered a qualified APM participant, the EP must provide and bill for a set percentage or more of their professional services in a given year through an APM. For the years 2019-2024, the percentage is set at 2019 and 2020 25% 2021 and 2022 50% 2023 and later 75% An eligible APM is considered to be a Shared savings program under section 1899 of the Social Security Act A demonstration program under section 1866C of the Social Security Act A demonstration program required under Federal law As a condition of participation in an APM, an EP must use certified EHR technology. 2019 4% 2020 5% 2021 7%

Classification Schema for Resource Utilization The Act also calls for the development by November 2018 of Care Episode Groups and Patient Condition Groups to measure resource usage attributable to clinical conditions whether or not inpatient hospitalization occurs, and to have the care episode groups and patient condition groups established for conditions that account for 50% of Part A and Part B expenditures to start. Section 102 Chronic Care Management Section 102 of the Act focuses on payment policy development for 2015 and beyond for chronic care management services. The focus is to be on making payment to only one applicable provider responsible for the overall care management of the patient. Section 105 Promoting Interoperability of EHRs Section 105 of the Act focuses on achieving widespread interoperability and reducing barriers to interoperability. Congress has declared this to be a national goal to attain by 12/31/18 through the use of CEHRT. Widespread interoperability is defined as Interoperability between certified EHR technology systems employed by meaningful EHR users under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive programs and other clinicians and health care providers on a nationwide basis. Interoperability itself means the ability if two or more health information systems or components to exchange clinical information and other information and to use the information that has been exchanged using common standards as to provide access to longitudinal information for health care providers in order to facilitate coordinated care and improved patient outcomes. The Secretary is to establish metrics by July 1, 2016 to determine if and to what extend the objective has been achieved to attain widespread interoperability. If by these measures, the goal has not been achieved by 12/31/18, the Secretary is to report to congress by 12/31/19 on the barriers that remain and to recommend actions to achieve the objective. The recommendations may include implementing payment adjustments for not being meaningful users (apart from MIPS) and decertification criteria for EHRs. To prevent blocking the sharing of information under the Act (defined as knowingly and willfully taking action such as to disable functionality to limit or restrict the compatibility or interoperability of CEHRT by an EP or a eligible hospital, the Secretary is to require providers to attest that they have taken no such actions as to their use of CEHRT. Additionally, the Secretary is to take steps by one year after the effective date of the Act to Provide for a website to report aggregated results of surveys of successful EHR users on the functionality of CEHRT products to enable users to directly compare products Report on mechanisms that would assist providers to compare and select CEHRT Section 202 Extension of Therapy Cap Exceptions Process The Act extends the therapy cap exceptions process for therapy services under Medicare Part B by two and a half years to 12/31/17. Section 412 Delay of Reductions to Medicaid DSH Allotments Under the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid Disproportionate Share was to have been cut $24.4 billion between 2017 and 2022. The Act serves to delay reductions to start in 2018 for Medicaid DSH allotments to the following schedule 2018 - $2 billion 2019 - $3 billion 2020 - $4 billion 2021 - $5 billion 2022 - $6 billion 2023 - $7 billion 2024 and 2025 - $8 billion

Section 507 Requiring Valid Prescriber National Provider Identifiers on Pharmacy Claims Section 507 mandates that for plan years 2016 and beyond, pharmacy claims under Medicare Part D include the valid NPI of the prescriber. The Secretary is to establish procedures to validate its authenticity. Section 511 Guidance on Application of Common Rule to Clinical Data Registries Section 511 of the act calls for the Secretary to issue clarification or modification to the Common Rule within one year of the enactment of the act as it applies to activities related to quality improvement and the use of qualified clinical data registries. Section 521 Extension of Two Midnight PAMA Rules on Certain Medical Review Activities The Act extends the constraint on RAC auditors from performing payment audit review for inpatient status as last extended by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (PAMA). The extension is to 9/30/15 for the remainder of FFY 2015. NO ICD 10 DELAY Also of note is the Act passed both Houses of Congress without any ICD 10 delay provision.