The Leading Edge In Helical Foundations. Engineering Roadmap. MacLean Dixie HFS. Building Solid Foundations

Similar documents
System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility

Stability. Security. Integrity.

Figure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

DIRT DWELLING. and your. Pin Foundations Inc., 2008

Engineered, Time-Tested Foundation Repairs for Settlement in Residential and Light Commercial Structures. The Leading Edge.

5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction

How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

The Stabilizer TM. Benefits. Supplemental support system for sagging beams and floor joists within a crawl space

Transmission Foundations. helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures.

Helical Pier Foundation System U.S. Patents 5,011,336; 5,120,163; 5,213,448

Step 11 Static Load Testing

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: HUBBELL POWER SYSTEMS, INC.

Underpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles

Designed and Engineered to Perform

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems

PRODUCT DRAWINGS AND RATINGS Section 7

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

Now That s IDEAL. Now That s IDEAL. LISTEN. RESEARCH. DESIGN. DELIVER.

RAM JACK INTRODUCTION

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

Step 6 Buckling/Slenderness Considerations

Page B-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 LOAD TESTS

High Capacity Helical Piles Limited Access Projects

DESIGNING STRUCTURES IN EXPANSIVE CLAY

EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL

Kentucky Lake Bridge Pile Load Testing Overview Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Columbus, Ohio 10/28/2015

GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY

POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

Appendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils

An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test

DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS. Presented by: Donald A. Deardorff, P.E. CHANCE Civil Construction Centralia, MO USA

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

Sample Project with SlurryTBM according to Anagnostou and Kovári

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

Up-Down Construction Utilizing Steel Sheet Piles and Drilled Shaft Foundations

Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars

Helical Piles. A Practical Guide to Design and Installation

Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load

How To Model A Shallow Foundation

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

Residential Decks. Planning and Development Services Department

Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test

Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles

ICC-ES Evaluation Report

STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR BONDING OR MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT OF INSULATION PANELS AND MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT OF ANCHOR AND/OR BASE SHEETS TO SUBSTRATES

Atlantic Foundation & Repair

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils

Wood Decks Zoning and construction requirements for open non-sheltered wood decks for residential dwellings.

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

INSITU TESTS! Shear Vanes! Shear Vanes! Shear Vane Test! Sensitive Soils! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:!

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

A Solid Foundation Solution for Homeowners. from. Our products are made with 90% Recycled Material Down. Right. Solid. GREEN.

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM SUMMARY REPORT:

DESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION

Evaluation Report CCMC R Pieux Vissés Vistech / Postech Screw Piles

Sports and High Mast Lighting Poles Phone: (866) Fax: (817)

TYPES OF PIERS USED IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION REPAIR

How To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska

Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Cable Installation Notes

Tremie Concrete CM 420 CM 420 CM 420 CM 420. Temporary Structures. Tremie Concrete

TZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE

DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL GEOTECHANICAL

SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS

Belt Drives and Chain Drives. Power Train. Power Train

ASSESSMENT OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM INDIRECT INSITU TESTS

Window Glass Design 5 According to ASTM E 1300

World Leader in earth anchoring since for Residential and Commercial Construction and Repairs

Activity 2.3b Engineering Problem Solving Answer Key

Pole Guying More Complicated Than Meets the Eye. NRECA TechAdvantage 2014 Presented by Jason Settle, P.E.

For a Coastal Site. A Pier-and-Beam Foundation. Our company specializes in oceanfront

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

GEAROLOGY 4-1 WORMS AND WORM GEARS WORMS AND WORM GEARS

Geotechnical Investigation Test Report

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

Transcription:

Engineering Roadmap For New Construction Helical Pile Design The Leading Edge In Helical Foundations MacLean Dixie HFS Building Solid Foundations

Before You Begin For the preliminary design of a new helical pile foundation, the following information should be collected: The loading conditions, including: o What is the compression load? o What is the tension load? o What is the lateral load? o Is the lateral load eccentric, i.e, is it being applied to the pile some distance above the ground surface? o Are seismic loads a consideration for this project? The structural fl oor plan of the proposed building o Are there heavily loaded interior columns? o Are piles installed at different locations within the building going to see very different load conditions? Pile Spacing Requirements The helical pile spacing will be determined through a combination of the structural load requirements, the structural integrity of the foundation components, and the minimum spacing requirements of the piles themselves. The minimum allowable pile spacing is 3 times the diameter of the largest helix measured edge-to-edge, or 4 times the diameter of the largest helix measured from center-to-center. Since spacing requirements apply only to the helices and not the shafts, a slight batter during installation of the piles can provide a convenient method of maintaining the minimum spacing. DISTANCE BETWEEN HELICAL PILES Perimeter Pile Design The design load on perimeter piles can be determined by multiplying the load per linear foot of the continuous footing by the allowable pile spacing. 4 x D Center to Center Do not exceed the maximum span length of the footing as provided by the structural engineer. 3 x D edge of helix to edge of helix MacLean Dixie HFS Building Solid Foundations

Shaft Selection Choose a shaft based on the required project loads by looking at the design tension or compression columns or the ultimate tension or compression columns on Table 1, depending upon whether you are using design or ultimate loads, and whether it is tension or compression that controls the design. Table 1 Description Designation Kt Torsional Capacity (ft-lbs) Max Design Tension (lbs) Max Design Compression (lbs) Ultimate Tension (lbs) Ultimate Compression (lbs) 1.0" RCS D6 10,00 30,000 7,00 60,000,000 1.0" RCS (High strength) D7 10 7,000 3,000 3,000 70,000 3,000 1.7" RCS D10 10 10,000 0,000 0,000.00" RCS D1 10 1,000 7,000 7,000 10,000 10,000.87" O.D. Pipe (0.03" wall) P8 8 7,00 40,000 30,000 80,000 60,000.87" O.D. Pipe (0.76" wall) P8H 8 9,000 0,000 36,000 7,000 3.00" O.D. Pipe (0.16" wall) P3 7 11,400 0,000 40,000 80,000 3.00" O.D. Pipe (0.300" wall) P3H 7 1,000 70,000,00 140,000 10,000 4.00" O.D. Pipe (0.37" wall) P4 6 0,000 70,000 60,000 140,000 10,000 4.00" O.D. Pipe (0.337" wall) P4H 6 6,000 78,000 00,000 16,000 8.6" O.D. Pipe (0.187" wall) P8 44,00 10,000 40,000 00,000 MacLean Dixie HFS Building Solid Foundations

Design Requirements Based on Soil Boring Logs, what zone(s) of unsuitable soil are present within the building footprint? Identify the unsuitable soil zones in order to develop a minimum tip embedment of the pile. Be sure to utilize only the Soil Boring Log(s) that are located within the foundation s footprint. Refer to geotechnical or site condition reports to review for Water Table notations that identify signifi cant wetted zone depths in order to specify helical pile embedment to penetrate the wetted zone into load bearing strata that is unaffected by seasonal wetting and drying. Helical Pile design requires that the piles be installed an additional distance equal to 3 times the largest helix once the soil resistance / installation torque has been achieved in order to seat the helices in load bearing strata. WETTED ZONE UNSUITABLE SOIL LOAD BEARING SOIL Example 1: A helical pile with multiple helices such as a 10-1 -14 confi guration. The largest helix shall determine the additional pile embedment length. In this example the pile must be advanced an additional 3. feet of embedment. Example : A helical pile that is designed with a single helix of 1 diameter must be advanced an additional 3 once the proper soil resistance has been achieved.

Helical Pile Capacity Calculations The sample calculation matrix on the last page of this Roadmap is provided as an example to demonstrate how the bearing capacity and pull-out capacity calculations are performed. The calculation table can be used as is below or expanded for a deeper soil profile for your own project. Alternately, a spreadsheet program, such as Excel could be set up to perform the calculations automatically using this Roadmap as a guide. Depth [Column A]: The depth below grade at a suitable increment (1-foot is usually sufficient) is entered in the first column. Soil Type [Column B]: The soil type at the corresponding depth is entered here. For the purposes of calculating helical pile foundation capacities it is sufficient to label a soil CLAY, for cohesive soils, SAND, for frictional SOILS, or MIXED, for soils that exhibit both cohesive and frictional properties. SPT-N [Column C]: The Standard Penetration Test N-value is entered here in blows per foot. This parameter will be used to calculate the soil strength parameters and unit weights. Unit Weight (γ) [Column D]: Based on the soil type and N-value, the following empirical correlations can be used to determine the unit weights of the soil layers. Note that below the water table the unit weight of water (6.4 pcf) must be subtracted to determine the buoyant weight of the soil. γ = 0.9 N+9 (for clay) γ=0.8 N+90 (for sand) γ=10 (for mixed soil) Cohesion (C) [Column E]: For soils labeled CLAY, the cohesion is approximately equal to N/8. SAND soils have a cohesion of 0 for our purposes. MIXED soils will be conservatively assigned a cohesion value of N/16, or half of would it would have been if the mixed layer were being modeled as CLAY. MacLean Dixie HFS Building Solid Foundations

Angle of Internal Friction (φ) [Column F]: For soils labeled CLAY, the internal friction angle is 0 for our purposes. NOTES about soil strength perameters: SAND soils will have a friction angle of 7 + 0.31*N. MIXED soils are These empirical correlations between the soil parameters and the result of the assigned a friction angle degrees lower than it would have if the mixed Standard Penetration Test are generally layer were being modeled as a sand. NOTE: Regardless of the N-value, conservative. If direct laboratory measurements of the soil parameters are available, we recommend that the value of the internal friction angle be limited to a maximum of 4. they should be used instead of the empirical values. Helix Diameter [Column G]: Write the nominal diameter of the helices (from Table ) that will be attached to the selected shaft in this column at the depths they will be installed to. Remember, the helices must be installed in order of increasing diameter, with the smallest helix at the bottom. Additionally, each helix must be spaced along the shaft a distance of 3 times the diameter of the lower helix. Table Shaft -> D6 D7 D10 D1 P8 P8H P3 P3H P4 P4H P8 6 inches 8 inches 0.308 0.308 0.303 0.303 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.36 0.36 0.303 10 inches 0.01 0.01 0.49 0.49 0.473 0.473 0.473 0.473 0.43 0.43 1 inches 0.74 0.74 0.719 0.719 0.711 0.711 0.711 0.711 0.668 0.668 14 inches 1.00 1.00 0.996 0.996 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.9 0.9 0.69 16 inches 0.984 0 inches 1.766 4 inches.719 Helix Area [Column H]: Determine the bearing area of the chosen helix in this column by cross referencing the helix diameter and the shaft type on Table. Write this value in this column. Average Overburden Pressure for Compression Calculation (σc) [Column I]: This column is the average value of the sum of the soil unit weights within a zone below the helix equal to 3 times the diameter of the helix. It is used for the calculation of the compression capacity of the pile.

Average Overburden Pressure for Tension Calculation (σt) [Column J]: This column is the average value of the sum of the soil unit weights within a zone above the helix equal to 3 times the diameter of the helix. It is used for the calculation of the tension capacity of the pile. Average Cohesion for Compression Calculation (Cc) [Column K]: This column is the average value of the cohesion within a zone below the helix equal to 3 times the diameter of the helix. It is used for the calculation of the compression capacity of the pile. Average Cohesion for Tension Calculation (Ct) [Column L]: This column is the average value of the cohesion within a zone above the helix equal to 3 times the diameter of the helix. It is used for the calculation of the tension capacity of the pile. Bearing Capacity Factor (Nq) [Column M]: Find the appropriate bearing capacity factor based on the friction angle of the soil on Table 3 and write it in this column. This is a unitless parameter used in the Terzaghi bearing capacity equation. It is a function of the friction angle of the soil and is used in the capacity calculation for frictional soils, it can be assumed as zero for CLAY soils. Bearing Capacity Factor (N c ) [Column N]: This is a unitless parameter used in the Terzaghi bearing capacity equation. For this bearing capacity factor we use a value of 9 for a CLAY or MIXED soil, this parameter can be entered as 0 in the table for a sand soil as it will not factor into the capacity calculations for SAND. Ultimate Compression Capacity [Column O]: The compression capacity of the helix in this row is found using the Terzaghi general bearing capacity equation: Q c ult = A h X (N q σ c + N c C c ) = H X (M X I +N X K) Ultimate Tension Capacity [Column P]: The compression capacity of the helix in this row is found using the Terzaghi general bearing capacity equation: Q c ult = A h X (N q σ c + N c C t ) = H X (M X J +N X L) Finally, sum the capacities of the individual helices, divide by 1,000 to convert pounds to kips, and write the results in the sum boxes. These are the ultimate capacities (compression and tension) of the helix plate configuration installed to the depth that you have selected. Compare the bearing capacity results to the project requirements and add or subtract helices, or increase or decrease the installation depth to find an optimal pile for your project. Table 3 Φ Nq 0 4.463 1 4.99.14 3 6.138 4 6.841 7.63 6 8.6 7 9.38 8 10.68 9 11.989 30 13.473 31 1.169 3 17.110 33 19.338 34 1.903 3 4.864 36 8.94 37 3.79 38 36.98 39 4.369 40 48.76 41 6.308 4 6.0 43 7.899 44 88.64 4 103.971

Bracket Requirements Consult the table below to determine the bracket that will be replaced for the top of the pile to embed into the footing or pile cap. In the event that tension loads exist, be sure to specify the bracket must be connected to the extension with appropriate connection bolts. NEW CONSTRUCTION BRACKET FOR -7/, 3-1/, 4-1/ PIPE PILES-MECHANICAL RATING CATALOG NUMBER CAT. PREFIX SHAFT (O.D. x wall thickness) W L T BOLT(in) QTY. GR. MAXIMUM COMPRESSION LOAD (kips) ALLOWABLE COMPRESSION LOAD (kips) NCB060604P8 P8-7/8" O.D. X.03" 6 6 1/ 3/4 60 30 NCB080804P8 P8-7/8" O.D. X.03" 1/ 3/4 60 30 NCB060604P8 P8H -7/8" O.D. X.76" 6 6 1/ 3/4 7 36 NCB080804P8 P8H -7/8" O.D. X.76" 1/ 3/4 7 36 NCB080804P3 P3 3-1/" O.D. X.16" 1/ 7/8 80 40 NCB101006P3 P3 3-1/" O.D. X.16" 10 10 3/4 7/8 80 40 NCB101006P3 P3H 3-1/" O.D. X.300" 10 10 3/4 7/8 10. NCB101006P4 P4 4-1/" O.D. X.37" 10 10 3/4 1 10 60 NCB101006P4 P4H 4-1/" O.D. X.37" 10 10 3/4 1 16 78 Additional Design Concerns Is the buckling capacity of the shaft an important consideration due to a signifi cant unbraced length? Is the pile cap designed to be encased in the footing? If the pile cap is to be encased within the footing; does the pile cap need to be galvanized? Please consult the most recent MacLean Dixie Engineering Reference Manual for additional information regarding these, and other potential design concerns.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Depth (ft) 1 Soil Type SPT-N (bpf) (pcf) C (psf) Φ Helix Diameter (in) Helix Area (sq. ft.) σc (psf) σt (psf) Cc (psf) Ct (psf) Nq Nc (lbs) (lbs) 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 0 SUM (kips):

MacLean Dixie HFS Building Solid Foundations