Requirements for Developing BIM Governance Model: Practitioners Perception



Similar documents
Synchronous Building Information Model-Based Collaboration in the Cloud: a Proposed Low Cost IT Platform and a Case Study

White paper: Information Management. Information is a strategic business asset are you managing it as such?

Electronic Document Workflow Platform for KBA Customers

BIM and Online Collaboration Platforms An investigation into emerging requirements

Building Information Management Model For Cloud Computing In AEC Network - A Case Study

How To Use Networked Ontology In E Health

SACM and CMDB Strategy and Roadmap. David Lowe ActionableITSM.com March 20, 2012

Using Enterprise Content Management Principles to Manage Research Assets. Kelly Mannix, Manager Deloitte Consulting Perth, WA.

ESPRIT ProCure. ICT at Work for the LSE ProCurement Chain:

Critical Barriers to BIM Implementation in the AEC Industry

TDT4252 / DT8802 Enterprise Modelling and Enterprise Architecture

A COMBINED TEXT MINING METHOD TO IMPROVE DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

NCOE whitepaper Master Data Deployment and Management in a Global ERP Implementation

Measuring Benefits from BIM across Whole-of-life Asset Management

A Spatial Data Infrastructure for a Spatially Enabled Government and Society

BuildingSMART International Infrastructure Room Work Plan 2015 Summary

Mobile 2D Barcode/BIM-based Facilities Maintaining Management System

InPro training environment training platform for BIM based collaborative working

How Application Portfolio Management and Enterprise Architecture Add Up to IT Governance

Project Coordination Using Cloud- Based BIM Computing in Education

Mergers and Acquisitions: The Data Dimension

European Security Standards Reference Implementation Initiative (ESSRII)

Reference Process for Enterprise Architecture enabled ICT Planning

CEN/BT/WG 215 N th draft BUSINESS PLAN

Sophisticated Common Data Environment (CDE) with BIMaaS Platform

Cloud computing for the architecture, engineering & construction sector: requirements, prototype & experience

School of Construction Management and Engineering, University of Reading, Reading, UK

Product Life Cycle Management in Life Sciences Industry

Cloud computing for the architecture, engineering & construction sector: requirements, prototype & experience

How To Improve Card Payment Protocol In Europe

The European Alliance for IoT Innovation

Teaching IP at higher education. Belgrade (EPO), 1 September 2010 Charles-Henry Massa (Belgium)

Big Data Integration: A Buyer's Guide

TDWI Project Management for Business Intelligence

Evaluating Pedagogical Quality: An Integral Part of Course Development Strategy

IT & Asset Management Quick-Start Consulting Services for Clients

Making cities smarter

BUILDING A STRATEGY FOR BIM

Jobsket ATS. Empowering your recruitment process

Investigating Role of Service Knowledge Management System in Integration of ITIL V3 and EA

Ming Sun 1, Ghassan Aouad, Nick Bakis, Stuart Birchall, William Swan

Data Integration Project

Enterprise Architecture Assessment Guide

Future Directions for a Healthcare Facility Information Management System

BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL INJURY MANAGEMENT. Introduction. The traditional medical model

COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM- SIZED ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES: IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY

SII Sustainability Innovation Inventory. BIMStorm LAX (Open Architecture)

Test management best practices

EU-Pay: A Multi-Channel EU Wide Payment System

Enterprise Security Architecture for Cyber Security. M.M.Veeraragaloo 5 th September 2013

How To Write A Blog Post On Globus

Module 6 Essentials of Enterprise Architecture Tools

Exploiting software supply chain business architecture: a research agenda

Boosting Productivity and Innovation Through. Public Sector Compliant Cloud Services

ITIL V3 and ASL Sound Guidance for Application Management and Application Development

Getting More Value from your BIM Process with Autodesk Collaboration and Data Management Products

Family Evaluation Framework overview & introduction

Associate Prof. Dr. Victor Onomza Waziri

A SOA visualisation for the Business

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Knowledgent White Paper Series. Developing an MDM Strategy WHITE PAPER. Key Components for Success

How to bridge the gap between business, IT and networks

SPACE-CENTRED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO IMPROVE CAD-BASED HEALTHCARE BUILDING DESIGN

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION

ARCHITECTURE SERVICES. G-CLOUD SERVICE DEFINITION.

IBM Master Data Management strategy

Cisco EnergyWise and CA ecosoftware: Deliver Energy Optimization for the Data Center

The CEN ORCHID Roadmap. Standardising Information in the Plant Engineering Supply Chain. Implementation Guide

A Holistic Framework for Enterprise Data Management DAMA NCR

MKS Integrity & CMMI. July, 2007

AUTOMATED SUSTAINABILITY COMPLIANCE CHECKING PROCESS: PROOF OF CONCEPT 1

TOWARD A FRAMEWORK FOR DATA QUALITY IN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD

Data Governance Best Practice

Construction Clients Forum (CCF) Overview. Feb 10 th 2016

ewise TM Project Knowledge Management Solution

Energy Data Management for Future Cities. Mr. Bejay Jayan 2 nd year PhD Researcher Supervisors : Dr. Haijiang Li & Prof.

Data Leakage Detection in Cloud Computing using Identity Services

White Paper: Collaborative Working 2013

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION: LEGISLATION EXECUTING CLOUD SERVICES

A DESIGN SCIENCE APPROACH TO DEVELOP A NEW COMPREHENSIVE SOA GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

Free and Open Source Document Management Systems

Research Report IT barometer A survey on the importance of IT in Finnish companies from the perspective of IT and business management

Industry Software from Siemens

The SEEMP project Single European Employment Market-Place An e-government case study

SHOULD SALES FORCE AUTOMATION CHANGES BRAND AUTOMATION FOR LG

10. System Evaluation

Design of Data Management Guideline for Open Data Implementation

How to Design a Project Management System

State Records Guideline No 18. Managing Social Media Records

FITMAN Future Internet Enablers for the Sensing Enterprise: A FIWARE Approach & Industrial Trialing

Grantee Forum. DOH Enterprise Grants Management System (EGMS)

The Role of Standards in Smart Cities

ITC 19 th November 2015 Creation of Enterprise Architecture Practice

Service Description Archiving

Professional Diploma. in Search Marketing.

ISSA Guidelines on Master Data Management in Social Security

Capgemini Financial Services. 29 July 2010

Policy Management Compliance 360 GRC Software Suite

ipad Application for Streamlining Healthcare Paperwork

Transcription:

Requirements for Developing BIM Governance Model: Practitioners Perception 1 Eissa Alreshidi; 2 Prof. Yacine Rezgui; 3 Dr. Monjur Mourshed (1) School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, E-mail: alreshidi.eissa@gmail.com,tel:+447577449798 (2) Institute Leader (BRE Institute in Sustainable Engineering) School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK (3) Senior Lecturer in Sustainable Engineering School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Abstract The construction industry is highly fragmented and highly regulated, involving intensive activities across supply chain and lifecycle. Construction projects have become very complex, including varying activities and processes, and requiring inputs from a wide range of disciplines. However, massive amounts of data are generated because construction projects involve multi-discipline, multi-actor collaboration during a building project s lifecycle. The generated data are sensitive with high concerns related to access rights, ownership, intellectual propriety and security. Until now, dealing with this information raises several issues such as data inconsistency, different data versions, data loss etc. Even though Building Information Modelling (BIM) offers a means of solving such problems, there is practical evidence to show that a governance model is needed to facilitate BIM management across the construction project supply-chain and lifecycle. A comprehensive survey was conducted with the aims of identifying construction industry practitioners requirements for developing a non-proprietary BIM governance model. Informed construction practitioners in the UK were the main contributors to this study. The findings of the survey reveal a need to develop a BIM governance model with its underpinning cloud infrastructure storage solution. KEYWORDS: BIM, BIM Governance, Cloud Computing, ICT, Collaboration, Construction Industry

1. Introduction Construction projects have become very complex, encompassing varying activities and processes, and requiring inputs from a wide range of disciplines. Thus, vast amounts of data are generated during a construction project which need to be coordinated and kept up-to-date and relevant through the whole lifecycle of the project (Hooper and Ekholm; Rezgui and Zarli, 2006; Anumba et al., 2008 ; Succar, 2009). In 2010, the UK government set a target for the UK construction industry, namely that it must adopt building information modelling (BIM) in the form of a collaborative 3D BIM as a minimum requirement by 2016 (Government, 2011). This policy brings new challenges to current research and development, incentivizing both BIM researchers and construction industry practitioners to overcome traditional methods of collaboration. However, there is practical evidences show that there is a need for a BIM governance model for facilitating BIM management across the construction project. Therefore, the overall aim of this study is to identify the need for developing a nonproprietary BIM governance model in line with the following objective; identify construction practitioners requirements for developing a non-proprietary BIM governance model. 2. Methodology A questionnaire survey was chosen as an appropriate mechanism. Therefore, the authors decided to conduct a wide survey targeting AEC professionals in the UK construction industry, with the aim of answering the stated questions in greater detail. The survey design was based on methods discussed by (Fink, 2009; Oates, 2005). The researchers have decided to choose AEC professional practitioners in the UK according to the following three criteria: sufficient practical experience of BIM; adequate knowledge of data management; and willingness to participate. With the assistance of key experts in this field as well as the LinkedIn professional network (LinkedIn, 2013), the panel of practitioners was assembled. The total number of the expert panel was 100 AEC UK practitioners. Survey monkey (Surveymonkey, 2013) was the tool used to design and distribute the survey. The distribution stage lasted nearly one month, from 16 April 2013 to 10 May 2013. Overall, 42 positive responses were received, a response rate of 42%.

3. Results 3.1. Implications of BIM and the need to develop a BIM governance model The majority of practitioners agreed that the new BIM management solutions will change the way teams collaborate on a construction project. Also, they agreed that BIM will improve project quality and efficiency in the UK construction industry. BIM will speed up the supplychain collaboration lifecycle. However, the majority neither agreed nor disagreed that developing a generic BIM data governance model would tackle most existing BIM collaboration problems; but nearly 18% strongly agreed on the value of BIM governance model development. One practitioner added the following comment: The BIM collaboration problems are very complicated. There is no single solution for those, but a good data governance model can improve the situation. This statement emphasized the need to tackle issues related to team collaboration by designing a good BIM governance model. Practitioners opinions about BIM data governance model development 3.59 3.74 3.96 4.04 Developing a generic BIM data governance model would tackle most of existing BIM collaboration problems BIM will speed up the supply-chain collaboration life cycle BIM will improve project quality and efficiency in UK construction industry The new BIM solutions will change the way teams collaborate in a construction project 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Level of agreement 0 Figure 1 Practitioners opinions about BIM data governance model development 3.2. Practitioners requirements for developing a BIM governance model The results from the survey show that addressing socio-organizational and legal requirements is more important than addressing technical requirements when developing a BIM governance model. Table 1 shows strong agreement on the first requirement category, namely, socio-organizational and legal requirements for developing a BIM governance model. This category includes: improving communication among disciplines, defining clear roles and responsibilities for stakeholders across disciplines through the lifecycle, and standardizing overall data management lifecycle policy. Developing a variety of protocols for governing BIMs is another important requirement, in addition to raising awareness about

BIM governance and providing help and support, with side-by-side intensive training in the use of the BIM governance model. The same table shows that the level of agreement on the second category, namely, technical requirements, is lower than the level of agreement on the category of socio-organizational requirements. This second category includes: allowing sharing through a common model, providing a notification system to inform other participants of changes being made on the model, providing a real-time mechanism with which team members can share/exchange information, establishing a central repository for storing data online, viewing and printing models online via the web, providing security checks when uploading, downloading and transferring models, and providing a secured log-in with access rights. Table 1 Practitioners requirements for developing BIM governance model BIM governance model requirements Mean Std. Deviation First Category: Socio-organizational and Legal requirements Help and support 4.04 0.706 Intensive training 3.93 0.829 Awareness raising 4.11 0.801 Development of protocols 4.30 0.775 Define clear roles, responsibilities for stakeholders across discipline through lifecycle. 4.33 0.620 Standardised overall life cycle data management policy 4.00 0.707 Provide real-time mechanism for sharing/exchanging information 4.12 0.909 Improve the communication among disciplines 4.37 0.742 Second Category: Technical Requirements Sharing through a common model 3.81 1.111 Secured log-in with access rights 3.85 0.818 Security checks for uploaded/downloaded and transferred models 3.96 0.759 User interface customization 3.54 0.948 Use web for online viewing and printing models 3.81 0.849 Central repository for data storage online 4.04 0.774 A notification system to inform team members of updated data 4.23 0.652

Other Requirements from practitioners Facilitate/federate/link different BIM model together Add more dimension in a modelling package Enable owners of data to decide when they publish their data Support working with live data, rather than dumb data Ability to coordinate at the same time as modelling 4. Discussion and Conclusion The BIM governance model still requires further development, as can be seen by considering the various BIM adoption barriers, current ICT practices and BIM governance requirements. The authors, however, argue that developing a BIM governance model with its cloud computing infrastructure will play a crucial role in addressing the above issues. Moreover, practical evidence (Beach et al., 2013) suggests that utilizing the BIM governance model with the support of cloud computing for data processing and storage capabilities will positively minimize BIM collaboration issues. The findings from this study demonstrate the strong need to develop a BIM governance model in order to tackle most of the BIM data-related issues that construction projects suffer from. There is a general agreement on most of the selected requirements for developing a BIM governance system. One practitioner stated, The BIM collaboration problems are very complicated. There is no single solution for those, but a good data governance model can improve the situation. Another argued that there could not be a common model, because BIM is consistent and must incorporate several domain models with clear ownership, due to the varying responsibilities and data needs to be dealt with. However, there is an issue related to the way these models are facilitated/federated/linked together. A well-structured model server would be a good solution on the conceptual level of the model, but not on the level of an integrated model consisting of several sub-models. A number of requirements for developing a BIM governance model have been classified within two categories: (a) socio-organizational and legal requirements, and (b) technical requirements. The first category includes: improving communication among disciplines, defining clear roles, establishing responsibilities for stakeholders across disciplines through the project lifecycle, standardizing overall data management lifecycle policy, developing a

variety of protocols for governing BIMs, raising awareness about BIM governance, providing help and support, and offering intensive training in the use of the BIM governance model. The second category includes: allowing data sharing through a common model, establishing a notification system, providing a real-time mechanism through which team members can share/exchange information, maintaining a central repository for storing data online, viewing and printing models online via the web, providing security checks when uploading, downloading and transferring models, and providing a secured log-in with access rights. 5. References ANUMBA, C. J., PAN, R., ISSA, R. A. & MUTIS, I. 2008 Collaborative project information management in a semantic web environment, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 15:78 94. BEACH, T. H., RANA, O. F., REZGUI, Y. & PARASHAR, M. 2013. Cloud Computing for the Architecture, Engineering & Construction Sector: Requirements, Prototype & Experience. Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications, 2, 8. FINK, A. 2009. How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide, Sage. GOVERNMENT, H. 2011. Low Carbon Construction Innovation and Growth Team. UK: Innovation and groth team. HOOPER, M. & EKHOLM, A. A pilot study: towards bim integration-an analysis of design information exchange & coordination. LINKEDIN. 2013. LinkedIn [Online]. Available: http://www.linkedin.com/ 2013]. OATES, B. J. 2005. Researching information systems and computing, Sage. REZGUI, Y. & ZARLI, A. 2006. Paving the way to the vision of digital construction: a strategic roadmap. Journal of construction engineering and management, 132, 767. SUCCAR, B. 2009. Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18, 357-375. SURVEYMONKEY. 2013. Surveymonkey [Online]. Available: https://www.surveymonkey.com/ 2013].