Acting by Attorney General THOMAS W..CORBETT, JR. CIVIL ACTION-EQUITY. Plaintiff. Defendant



Similar documents
CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Chapter 21 Credit Services Organizations Act

Case 2:06-cv JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15

-1- SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Fraudster From Selling Securities In Idaho

ILLINOIS CREDIT REPAIR LAWS

- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual,

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DEFENDANT S COUNTERCLAIM

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S

APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF COURT ORDER ENTERED IN FTC v. IRA SMOLEV, ET AL. FOR DEFENDANT BRUCE TURIANSKY ON DEFINITIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Michie's Legal Resources. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence Act of [Acts 1999, ch. 201, 2.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

JAIME M. HAWLEY, NAN X. ESTRELLA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i~, I:, ~lsn~ict FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORID CQU?

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"), for its Complaint alleges:

Case 3:08-cv JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

CAR DEALERS LICENSE - APPLICATION FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Retail Finance Agreement

CALIFORNIA LEMON LAW SUMMARY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JA-DAB Document 53 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1974

(c) Providing advice or assistance to a buyer with regard to either subdivision (a) or (b) of this paragraph.

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1

Debt Adjusting Companies and Credit Services Businesses: Tennessee s Requirements

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( Bureau ), through its examiners and other

Case 2:13-cv TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Compulsory Arbitration

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants.

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE

Defendant s Interrogatories Addressed to Plaintiff(s) Motor Vehicle Liability Cases

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Fraud - Trading Commodity Futures

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. against LEAD CONCEPTS, INC. and CHRISTOPHER WEIR (collectively referred to as

Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S

No. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff,

MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER SALESPERSON STUDY GUIDE MATERIALS

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

COMPLAINT. The amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds Fifty

COLORADO CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT. Table of Contents COLORADO CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT... 1

ADVERTISING GUIDELINES

COURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

SENAlJO S.B. No INTRODUCED BY SEN. MANNY VILLAR EXPLANATORY NOTE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMENDED COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant s Interrogatories Addressed To Plaintiff Premises Liability Cases

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE LAW SECTION 63, SUBDIVISION 15

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY

CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C et. seq.

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Illinois Compiled Statutes. HIGHER EDUCATION (110 ILCS 1005/) Private College Act.

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : :

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

HOUSE BILL No page 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF INSURANCE LEGISLATORS (NCOIL) Proposed Consumer Legal Funding Model Act

OCCUPATIONS CODE TITLE 8. REGULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND INDUSTRIAL TRADES CHAPTER RESIDENTIAL SERVICE COMPANIES. As Revised and in Effect on

Commodity Futures Trading Commission CEA CASES NAME: PENNSYLVANIA CO-OPERATIVE POTATO GROWERS, INC., AND OWEN L. BARKLEY

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.

pin THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

SCREEN SPECIALISTS and RICHARD REUSCH, individually, stipulate that the ultrasound. are prescription devices as cleared for marketing by the

CONSENT ORDER (As to Respondents North America Marketing, LLC and TM Multimedia Marketing, LLC)

How To Sue A Magazine Publisher In Cocolorado

INTRODUCTION. 1. The State of Maine and Securities Administrator (hereinafter collectively

DEBT MANAGEMENT BOND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

NO. PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION. Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas,

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

13cv8257 Judge Virginia M. Kendall Magistrate Jeffrey T. Gilbert

STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS

MORTGAGE LOAN CORRESPONDENT BOND ADVANCE FEES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF Delaware

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Transcription:

....,..'.). IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CO~lliONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 1996 Central Pennsylvania Legal servicfs, Inc. 213-A North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 232-0581 1 You have been sued in Court. If you wish to defend against the claims set forth in th~ following pages, you must take action within twenty'(20) days after this Complaint and Notice are served by entering a written appearance personally or by attorney and filing in writing with the Court your defenses or objections to the claims set forth against you. You are warned that if you fail to do so the case may proceed without you, and a judgment may be entered against you by the Court without further notice for any money claimed in the Complaint or for any other claim or relief requested by the Plaintiff. You may lose money or property or other rights important to you. ~. ---' YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO NOT ~.VE A LAWYER OR CANNOT AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE OFFICE(S) SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL HELP., NOTICE TO DEFEND v. METRO CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH JEEP-EAGLE, INC. 6729 Essington Avenue Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19153 ',.. Defendant -- -... '-." c: -_~.. - :.r_:::..:. t- _'-. : '. ::.-' --:-:. : -. ; Plaintiff Acting by Attorney General THOMAS W..CORBETT, JR. CIVIL ACTION-EQUITY

.'.,.-, (,./ Public Services and Lawyers Referral Committee Dauphin County Bar Association 213 North Front Street - Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 232-7536 John E. Kelly Deputy Attorney General Office of Attorney General Bureau of Consumer Protection 21 S. 12th Street, Second Floor Philadelphia, PA 19i07 (215) 560-2437 " - 2 -

/ ;.,' \. 2. Based on its investigation the Commonwealth believes that Defendant has u.?~<j... ~~. _J..._~l::!9.Y.t:. to use methods,. acts or practices declared unlawful by the Consumer Protection Law; the Pennsylvania Automotive Industry. Trade Practices' Regulation, 37 Pa. Cod.e 301 (hereinafter "Auto Regulations"); the Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act, Act of June 28, 1947, P.L. 1110, as amended, 69 P.S. 601 et seq., (hereinafter "MVSFA") jand the Federal Odometer Law,.Act of July '5,.1994, P.L. 103-272, 49 U.S.C. 32701 et seq., and accompanying regulations 49 C.F.R. 580.... 3. The Commonwealth believes that the public interest is served by seeking before this Honorable Court an injunction to restrain methods, acts or practices complained of herein. 4. The unlawful methods, acts or practices desciribed above have been wilfully used by Defendant. 5. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C.S.A. 761. I I. THE P.~TIES ~ 6. Plaintiff is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting by Attorney General THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR., through the Bureau of Consumer Protection. 7. Defendant, METRO CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH-JEEP-EAGLE, INC. (hereinafter "Metro"), is a Pennsylvania corporation engaged.' in trade and commerce within the Commonwealth as a duly licensed motor vehicle dealer from a principal place of business located -2-

'. ( ( at 6729 Essington Avenue, Philadelphia County. II. METRO'S BUSINESS PRACTICES 8. Beginning at a time u.nknown to Plaintiff and continuing into the present, in connection with the sale of motor vehicles Defendant provides consumer financing pursuant to the MVFSA as a duly licensed installment seller. 9. As a licensed inst~llment seller Defendant enters into installment sale contracts with consumers and thereafter either collects payments u~der said contracts or sells, t~ansfers or assigns them to a duly licensed sales finance company. 10. In the normal course of business, installment sale contracts entered into between Defendant and consumers are J- invariably sold, transferred or assigned to a sales finance company. 11.. With regard to motor vehicle sales transactions in which Defendant provides financing, Defendant often engages in the practice known as "spot delivery." 12. Spot delivery is the practice whereby Defendant enters into a sales agreement and installment sale contract under specific finance terms; transfers title an~ registration to the purchaser; and immediately delivers the motor vehicle to the purchaser. 13. In some instances through a separate document Defendant purports to make the sales agreement and installment sale contract conditioned upon its ability to subsequently -3-

t. I. 0,.. ( "secure financing" (e.g. sell or assign the 'contract to a sales finance company) under the specified terms.,..- -... _....- _-..... _. -.. -....' 14. The MVSFA requires that installment sale contracts.... contain all agreements of the parties relating to the installment sale; tha~ they be completed as to all essential provisions and contain no blank spaces; that they be signed by both, parties; and that co~ies be provided to buyers at the time.of signing. 15. The Auto Regulations prohibit increasing the contract price of a vehicle, and require that Defendant provide purchasers with sale's agre"ements and installment sale contracts that clearly identify all conditions precedent to Defendant's acceptance of said contracts together with a statement that purchasers may _cancel their contracts and receive a full refund until such conditions are met. 16. Defendant's installment sale contracts fail to provide the essential provision that said contract is conditioned upon its sale, transfer or assignment to a sales finance company. 17. In some instances Defendant'S installment sale contracts contain blank spaces and do not contain the signatures of both Defendant and purchasers. 18. In some instances Defendant fails to provide Plrchasers with copies of sales agreements and installment sale contracts at the time said documents are signed. 't 19. In making spot delivery sales, acting as an agent. for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Defendant requires purchasers to obtain insurance coverage for the vehicle, -4-

., completes a, title transfer application on the purchaser's behalf, and either issues a. tempor.ary ~egi.str~~ion..~!. trans~~r.s.. t.he license plate from the trade~in vehicle to the newly purchased vel:licle. 20. Thereafter, if Defendant is unsuccessful in selling, transferring or assigning the installment sale contracts under the terms specified therein, Defendant represents to purchasers that said.~ontracts ar~.void and that purchasers must either enter into another installment ~ales contract under less favorable financial terms~br return the vehicle and transfer title back to Defendant. 21. Where purchasers return their'vehicles, in accordance with Defendant's instructions, Defendant fails to obtain odometer disclosure statements from them as required by Federal Law. 22. In some cases where purchasers ret~ n their vehicles in accordance with Defendant's instructions, Defendant refuses to return the purchasers' trade-in vehicles and resells them to third parties. 23. Defendants resell returned and previously sold vehicles as new in violation of the Auto R~gulations and Consumer Protection Law. '. IV. Ch~IM FOR RELIEF COUNT I 24. The Plaintiff restates and incorporates herein by -5-

. - reference all matters set forth in ~~1 through 23 above. 25. Defendant's conduct described above constitutes an. ).- -6-28. The Plaintiff restates and incorporates herein by. reference all matters set forth in ~~1 through 27 above. 29. Defendant's conduct described above violates 613 and 615 of the MVSFA which constitutes a per selunlawful method of competition and unfair or deceptive act or P1actice in the conduct of trade ~r commerce pursuant to 201-3 of the Consumer ProtectiQn Law as defined by 201-2(4)ii, 201-2(4)v and 201-2(4)vii. COUNT III 26. The Plaintiff restates and incorporates herein by reference all matters set forth in ~~1 through 25 above. 27. Defendant's conduct described above constitutes an.unlawful method of competition and an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the conduct of trade or commerce pursuant to 201-3 of the Consumer Protection Law as set forth in 301.4(a) (2)v, 301.4(a)3, 301.4(a)7, 301.2(4), and 301.2(6) of the Auto Regulations. COUNT'II unlawful method of competition and an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the conduct of trade or commerce pursuant to 201-3 of the Consumer Protection Law as defined by 201-2(4)ii, 201-2(4)v, 201-2(4)vi and 201-2(4)vii. /!

.'. I I. '.{ v. PR~YER FOR RELIEF vllierefore, the Commonwealth respectfullyrequests.this Honorable Court to issue an Order: A. Finding Defendant, Metro's conduct as described in this Complaint in violation of the Consumer Protection Law, Regulations, ~NSFA.. and Federal Odometer Law. Auto B. Enjoining Defendant, its agents, employees, successors and all other persons acting on its behalf, directly or through any corporate or other entity, as follows: 1. Every installment sale contract (a~ defined by the MVSFA) SHALL be completed and deliv~red~o buyers in full conformity with the MVSFA. In conneltion therewith: (a) Every installment sale contract shall be 't in writing and shall contain all of the agreements between the buyer and the seller relating to the installment sale of the motor vehicl~ sold and shall be signed by both the buyer and the COUNT IV 30. The Plaintiff restates and incorporates herein by reference all matters set fo~th in "1 through 29 above. 31. Defendant's conduct described above violates 3270S of-the Federal Odometer Law which constitutes a per se unlawful method of competition and unfair or deceptive act or practice in the conduct of trade or commerce pursuant to 201-3 of the Consumer Protection Law as 'defined by 201-2(4)ii, 201-2(4)v, 201~2(4)vi and 201-2(4)vii. -7-

... / ( '. seller. (b).. -.. Every installment sale contr~ct.shall_be..._.. _.... _.. -..._. completed as to all essential provisions including, but not limited toj the signi~g sale, transfer and assignment contingen~ies"priorto of such contract by the buyer. (c) No installment sale contract shall be signed by any party thereto' when such contract contains blank spaces to be filled i~ as permitted by 615(A) '(d) after such'contract has been signed except of the MVSFA. An exact copy of the installment.sale contract shall be furnished by the seller to the buyer at the time the buyer signs such contract in full conformity with 613(C) of the MVSFA. 2. Every sales agreement and installment sale contract SR~L be completed and delivered in full conformity with the Auto Regulations. In connection therewith: (a) Such contracts shall contain a list of all conditions precedent to the dealer's acceptance of the contracts set forth in a clear and conspicuous manner including, but not limited to, sale, transfer or assignment contingencies as well as a statement that the purchaser may cancel the contract at' any time until Defendant advises buyers that the conditions have been met. (b) Defendant shall provide buyers with. copies of sales agreements and installment sale contracts in full conformity with 301.4(a)3. -8-

".:.! " '. 3. Defendant SHALL NOT make any representation -9- ( ", have sufficient information upon which a reasonable,belief in the representation is false and misleading or if Defendant does not truth of the representation'could be based. sale contracts for specific rates and terms unless it has a prior reasonable basis that it ~ill be able to sell,.transfer or assign vehicle is new if it has been sold, bargained, exchanged, or or a statement of ~act concerning its ability to sell, transfer or assign an installment sale contract at a particular rate and the contract under such rates and terms. for a particular term if it. knows or should know that such given away; hai had title tranif~ried from the person who first acquired it from the manufacturer or dealer; or has an odometer readin g of 500 miles or more, not including mileage incurred in' reading of 500 miles or more, not including mileage incurred in delivery from the manufacturer or in transporting the vehicle between dealers for sale. pursuant to a spot delivery and it is ret~rned by the buyer: disclosure statement from the buyer upon the return of the vehicle in full conformity with the Federal Odometer Act. buyers that said vehicle is used. 4. Defendant SHALL NOT enter into installment 5. Defendant SHALL NOT represent that any motor 6. Where Defendant sells a motor vehicle (a) Defendant shall obtain an odometer (b) Defendant shall disclose to subsequent

/, :'f 1'. ""':.. I.'..' r (. \ C. Granting restitution to all purchasers who suffered monetary loss resulting from Defendant's failure to -_._- - -. honor the terms of its originalinstall~entsale contracts. D. Finding the Defendant liable and requiring the. Defendant to pay to the Commonwealth a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000.00 for each and every wilful violation of the Consumer Protection Law and the Commonwealth's costs.in pursuing this action. E. Granting such other relief as the Court deems appropriate. Respectfully Submitted, BY: JOHN' E. KELLY Deputy Attorney General Office of Attorney Genera Bureau of Consumer Protect~on 21 S. 12th Street, '2nd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19107 (215) 560-2437 't -10-

'. ( c, I, JANIS PAR~ILLA, am an Agent with the Office.ofAttorney General, Philadelphia Regional Office of the. Bureau of Consumer. Protection. I hereby affirm that the facts set forth in the foregoing Complaint in Equity..are true and' correct and made subject to the pen~lties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. 4904, relating to unsworn statements made to authorities. VERIFICATION