UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No
|
|
|
- Wilfrid Porter
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General of the State ofnew Jersey, and STEVE C. LEE, Acting Director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs, Case No STIPULATED ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MONETARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, v. EQUILIV INVESTMENTS, a Limited Liability Company and RYAN RAMMINGER, an individual, Defendants. Plaintiffs, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission") and John J. Hoffman, Acting Attorney General of the State ofnew Jersey ("Attorney General"), and Steve C. Lee, Acting Director ofthe New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs ("Director") (collectively, "New Jersey" or "State ofnew Jersey"), filed a Complaint for a permanent injunction and other equitable and monetary relief in this matter against Equiliv Investments, LLC ("Equiliv" or "Prized") and Ryan Ramminger ("Ramminger") (collectively "Defendants"). The FTC brought its claims pursuant to Section 13(b) ofthe Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. 53(b) and New Jersey brought its claims pursuant to the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act ("CFA"), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq. Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate to the entry of this Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment ("Final Order" or "Order") to resolve all matters in dispute in this action between them. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1
2 FINDINGS 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter. 2. The Complaint charges that Defendants participated in deceptive and unfair acts or practices in violation of Section 5 ofthe FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45, and unconscionable commercial practices, misrepresentations, false promises, and/or omissions of material fact in violation ofn.j.s.a. 56:8-2 ofthe CPA, in connection with the advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of mobile software applications ("Apps") by uploading malicious software ("malware") onto consumers' mobile devices for the purposes of mining for virtual currencies. 3. Defendants neither admit nor deny any of the allegations in the Complaint, except as specifically stated in this Final Order. Only for purposes of this action, Defendants admit the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction. 4. Defendants waive any claim that they may have under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412, concerning the prosecution of this action through the date ofthis Final Order, and agrees to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. 5. The parties waive all rights to appeal or otherwise challenge or contest the validity ofthis Final Order. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Order, the following definitions apply: 6. "App" means any software application or code that can be transmitted to a mobile device. "App" shall also include any software referred to by the Company as an "App" or "Mobile App" in the course of its own communications or business practices. 2
3 7. "Covered Information" means infonnation from or about an individual consumer, including but not limited to (a) a first and last name; (b) a home or other physical address, including street name and name of city or town; (c) an address or other online contact information, such as an instant messaging user identifier or a screen name; (d) a telephone number; (e) a Social Security number; (f) a driver's license or other state-issued identification number; (g) a financial institution account number; (h) credit or debit card information; (i) a persistent identifier, such as a customer number held in a "cookie," a static Internet Protocol ("IP") address, a mobile device ID, or processor serial number; U) precise geolocation data of an individual or mobile device, including but not limited to GPS-based, WiFi-based, or cell-based location information ("geolocation information"); (k) an authentication credential, such as a username and password; or (I) any other communications or content stored on or about a consumer's mobile device. 8. "Defendants" means Equiliv and its successors and assigns and Ramminger. 9. "Prized App" means the App, Prized, offered by Defendants to consumers. 10. "Software" means any file, program, application, content, code or set of instructions that controls, directs, or assists in the operation of a computer or other electronic device and/or instructs a computer or other electronic devices as to what tasks to perform. ORDER I. PROHIBITIONS ON MISREPRESENTATIONS IN CONNECTION THE MARKETING AND SALE OF SOFTWARE IT IS ORDERED that Defendants, Defendants' officers, agents, and employees, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order, are permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly making material misrepresentations in connection with the marketing, distributing, offering for sale, sale, or 3
4 installation of any mobile apps and software, including but not limited to misrepresenting, expressly or by implication that: (1) a mobile app or any other software does not contain malware, spyware, time bombs, or viruses; or (2) mobile app or software users are able to earn points, prizes, rewards, or other benefits. II. PROHIBITIONS ON THE MARKETING AND SALE OF MALICIOUS SOFTWARE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, Defendants' officers, agents, and employees, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice ofthis Order, are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from, directly or indirectly, engaging in or participating in the marketing, distributing, offering for sale, sale, or installation of any mobile apps or software that uses or interferes with a consumer's computer or other electronic device without consumers' express authorization, or for any purpose other than that specifically authorized, including but not limited to software that: A. Damages, disables, or accesses without consumers' express authorization or in excess of consumers' authorization, any computer or other electronic device; B. Uses the computing resources of consumers' computer or other electronic device without consumers' express authorization or in excess of consumers' authorization, including but not limited to mining for virtual currencies; or C. Stores, maintains, or otherwise exchanges virtual currencies without consumers' express authorization or in excess of consumers' authorization. III. STATE MONETARY RELIEF IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: A. Defendants have also agreed to pay to the State ofnew Jersey Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($50,000.00) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:8-13 ("State Monetary Relief"). 4
5 B. Out of the State Monetary Relief, Defendants shall pay Five Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($5,200.00) to the State ofnew Jersey on, or before, the entry of this Order. C. The remaining Forty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($44,800.00) from the State Monetary Relief shall be suspended and automatically vacated within three (3) years ofthe entry ofthis Order, provided: 1. Defendants comply with the restraints and conditions set forth in this Order; and 2. Defendants do not engage in any acts or practices in violation of the CFA. D. In the event Defendants fail to comply with the restraints and conditions of this Order, the entire balance of the suspended State Monetary Relief shall be immediately due and payable upon written notice by the State ofnew Jersey. In any such notice, however, the State ofnew Jersey shall provide Defendants with the specific details of Defendants' alleged noncompliance and Defendants shall be afforded a thirty (30) day period to cure any such noncompliance. E. All payments made in satisfaction of the State Monetary Relief shall be made by certified or cashier's check, money order, wire transfer or credit card made payable to the "New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs" and forwarded to: Van Mallett, Case Tracking Management Division of Consumer Affairs 124 Halsey Street, i 11 Floor P.O. Box Newark, New Jersey F. Upon making any payment to the State ofnew Jersey, Defendants shall be immediately divested of any interest in, or ownership of; the monies paid. All interest in such 5
6 monies, and any subsequent interest or income derived therefrom, shall inure entirely to the benefit ofnew Jersey pursuant to the terms herein. IV. DESTRUCTION OF AFFECTED CONSUMER INFORMATION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants and their representatives are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly: A. Disclosing, using, or benefitting from Covered Information that any Defendant obtained prior to entry of this Order in connection with the Prized App; and B. Failing to destroy such Covered Information in all forms in their possession, custody, or control within 30 days after entry of this Order. Provided, however, that customer information need not be disposed of, and may be disclosed, to the extent requested by a government agency or required by law, regulation, or court order. V. ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENT IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants obtain acknowledgements of receipt of this Order: A. Defendants, within 7 days of entry of this Order, must submit to the Commission and the State ofnew Jersey an acknowledgment of receipt ofthis Order sworn under penalty of perjury. B. For 5 years after entry of this Order, Defendants must deliver a copy ofthis Order to: (1) all principals, officers, directors, and LLC managers and members; (2) all employees, agents, and representatives who participate in the advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, offering for sale, or sale of any App, and (3) any business entity resulting from any change in structure as set forth in the Section titled Compliance Reporting. Delivery must occur within 7 6
7 days of entry of this Order for current personnel. For all others, delivery must occur before they assume their responsibilities. C. From each individual or entity to which Defendants deliver a copy of this Order, Defendants must obtain, within 30 days, a signed and dated acknowledgment of receipt of this Order. VI. COMPLIANCE REPORTING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants make timely submissions to the Commission and the State ofnew Jersey: A. One year after entry of this Order, each Defendant must submit a compliance report, sworn under penalty of perjury: 1. Each Defendant must: (a) identify the primary physical, postal, and address and telephone number, as designated points of contact, which representatives Plaintiffs may use to communicate with Defendants; (b) identify all of Defendants' businesses by all of their names, telephone numbers, and physical, postal, , and Internet addresses; (c) describe the activities of each business that engages in the advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, offering for sale, or sale of any software, including apps and the involvement of any other Defendant (which Individual Defendants must describe if they know or should know due to their own involvement); (d) describe in detail whether and how that Defendant is in compliance with each Section of this Order; and (e) provide a copy of each Order Acknowledgment obtained pursuant to this Order, unless previously submitted to Plaintiffs. 2. Additionally, each Individual Defendant must: (a) identify all telephone numbers and all physical, postal, and Internet addresses, including all residences; (b) identify all business activities, including any business for which such Defendant performs services whether 7
8 as an employee or otherwise and any entity in which such Defendant has any ownership interest; and (c) describe in detail such Defendant's involvement in each such business, including title, role, responsibilities, participation, authority, control and any ownership. B. For 20 years following entry of this Order, each Defendant must submit a compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 14 days of any change in the following: 1. Each Defendant must report any change in: (a) any designated point of contact; or (b) the structure of any Corporate Defendant or any entity Defendant has any ownership interest in or directly or indirectly controls that may affect compliance obligations arising under this Order, including: creation, merger, sale, or dissolution of the entity or any subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages in any acts or practices subject to this Order. 2. Additionally, each Individual Defendant must report any change in: (a) name, including aliases or fictitious name, or residence address; or (b) title or role in any business activity, including any business for which such Defendant performs services whether as an employee or otherwise and any entity in which such Defendant has any ownership interest, and identify the name, physical address, and any Internet address of the business or entity. C. Each Defendant must submit to the Commission and New Jersey notice of the filing of any bankruptcy petition, insolvency proceeding, or any similar proceeding by or against such Defendant within 14 days of its filing. D. Any submission to the Commission required by this Order to be sworn under penalty of perjury must be true and accurate and comply with 28 U.S.C. 1746, such as by concluding: "I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 8
9 that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on: "and supplying the date, signatory's full name, title (if applicable), and signature. E. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, all submissions to the Commission pursuant to this Order must be ed to [email protected] or sent by overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to: Associate Director for Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C The subject line must begin: FTC v. Equiliv, LLC. F. Except as otherwise provided herein, any submissions to the State ofnew Jersey pursuant to this Order shall be sent by a nationally recognized courier service that provides for tracking services and idenfitication of the person signing for the documents to: Glenn T. Graham, Deputy Attorney General, Office ofthe Attorney General, Division of Law, 124 Halsey Street, Floor, Newark, New Jersey VII. RECORDKEEPING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants must create certain records for 20 years after entry of the Order, and retain each such record for 5 years. Specifically, in connection with the advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, offering for sale, or sale of any software or app, Defendants must maintain the following records: A. Accounting records showing the revenues from all goods or services sold, all costs incurred in generating those revenues, and the resulting net profit or loss; B. Personnel records showing, for each person providing services, whether as an employee or otherwise, that person's: name, addresses, and telephone numbers; job title or position; dates of service; and, if applicable, the reason for termination; 9
10 C. Complaints and refund requests, whether received directly or indirectly, such as through a third party, and any response; D. All records necessary to demonstrate full compliance with each provision of this Order, including all submissions to Plaintiffs; and E. A copy of each terms of service, privacy policy, advertisement or other marketing material. VIII. COMPLIANCE MONITORING IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the purpose of monitoring Defendants' compliance with this Order, including any failure to transfer any assets as required by this Order: A. Within 14 days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the Commission or New Jersey, Defendants must: submit additional compliance reports or other requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury; appear for depositions; and produce documents for inspection and copying. The Commission or New Jersey are also authorized to obtain discovery, without further leave of court, using any of the procedures prescribed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 29, 30 (including telephonic depositions), 31, 33, 34, 36, 45, and 69. B. For matters concerning this Order, Plaintiffs are authorized to communicate directly with Defendants. Defendants must permit representatives of the Commission or New Jersey to interview any employee or other person affiliated with Defendants who has agreed to such an interview. The person interviewed may have counsel present. C. Plaintiffs may use all other lawful means, including posing, through its representatives, as consumers, suppliers, or other individuals or entities, to Defendants or any individual or entity affiliated with Defendants, without the necessity of identification or prior 10
11 notice. Nothing in this Order limits the Commission's lawful use of compulsory process, pursuant to Sections 9 and 20 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 49, 57b-1. IX. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retain jurisdiction ofthis matter for purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Order. SO ORDERED this day of, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11
12 SO STIPULATED AND AGREED BY: FOR PLAINTIFFS: li'ederal TR.r\.nE COMMISSION JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General ofne\v.jersey, and STEVE LEE, Acting Director of the,..,.,,~,... u v Divi r. of "-\.!.l~,ul'c HELEN WONG Federal Tmde Commission 600 Pennsylvania A venue N. \V. Washington, DC hwoug@ ftc.. gov P: (202) G ENN T. GRAHAM ELLIOTf M. SIEBERS Deputy Attorneys General State ofne'<y Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety Division of Law 124 Halsey Street, 5th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07 J 0 l glenn.grahamtq)dol.!ps.state.nj.us [email protected] P: (973) as an officer of hjuiliv LLC Date: Ryan Rammil}ger, individiua!ly 12
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATES
Case 1:15-cv-01872-WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. I: IS ~c.
Case 1:15-cv-01872-WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. PROFESSIONAL CAREER DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Case No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and STEVE C. LEE, Acting Director of the New
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATES OF COLORADO, FLORIDA, INDIANA, KANSAS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, NORTH CAROLINA, OHIO, TENNESSEE,
Case 3:16-cv-03474 Document 2-1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case :-cv-0 Document - Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION United States of America, Plaintiff, v. InMobi Pte Ltd., a private limited company,
Case 2:13-cv-01887-ES-JAD Document 282-1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 4861 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:13-cv-01887-ES-JAD Document 282-1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 4861 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Wyndham Worldwide
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:08-cv-02062-JDW-AEP Document 139 Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 14 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:08-cv-2062-T-27MAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW ORDER
Case 8:13-cv-01647-SDM-TGW Document 10 Filed 07/17/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel CAROLE A. PAYNTER (CP 4091) Federal Trade Commission 150 William Street, 13th floor New York, New York 10038 (212) 264-1225 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-cjc-jpr Document 00 Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #:0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. DENNY LAKE, et al. Defendants. Case
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) AGREEMENT CONTAINING ) CONSENT ORDER Snapchat, Inc., ) a corporation. ) ) FILE NO. 132 3078 ) The Federal Trade Commission ( Commission
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 132 3088 COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny In the Matter of PaymentsMD,
Case 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 2-1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.
Case 1:14-cv-10612-PBS Document 2-1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VERSATILE MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts
In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division
Case 1:14-cv-02211-AT Document 61-1 Filed 12/28/15 Page 1 of 20 In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Plaintiff,
individually and as an officer of Safety Cell, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade
WILLIAM E. KOVACIC General Counsel BARBARA ANTHONY Regional Director Northeast Region RONALD L. WALDMAN (RW 2003) DARA J. DIOMANDE (DD 4304) DONALD G. D AMATO (DG 3008) Federal Trade Commission 1 Bowling
United States District Court Southern District of Florida. Case No. -Civ- -
United States District Court Southern District of Florida Case No. -Civ- - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, v. Plaintiff, American Debt Settlement Solutions, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Michael
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
2014-CFPB-0006 Document 1 Filed 02/12/2015 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2015-CFPB-0006 In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER Flagship
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION In the Matter of MACHINIMA, INC., a corporation File No. 1423090 AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER The Federal Trade Commission has conducted
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 122 3095 COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny In the Matter of GMR TRANSCRIPTION
2016-CFPB-0006 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
2016-CFPB-0006 Document 1 Filed 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2016-CFPB- In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER FALONI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. NU SKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) a corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) CONSENT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) FILE NO. 022 3053 ) THE LASER VISION INSTITUTE, LLC, ) a corporation, et al. ) AGREEMENT CONTAINING ) CONSENT ORDER ) The Federal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 6:12-cv-01618-ACC-KRS Document 241 Filed 02/11/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID 4291 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION v. Case No:
Case 3:14-cv-01046-RNC Document 17 Filed 08/12/14 Page 1 of 18. UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO}Jo.RT,. DISTRICT OF CONNECTICuT. 1.
Case 3:14-cv-01046-RNC Document 17 Filed 08/12/14 Page 1 of 18 FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO}Jo.RT,. DISTRICT OF CONNECTICuT. 1.JG I 2 p LJ: 2 1 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and STATE OF CONNECTICUT, L/3
STIPULATION FOR ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MONETARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT RYAN FOLAND
MICHELLE L. SCHAEFER [email protected] 2 JOHN ANDREW SINGER j [email protected] BENJAMIN J. THEISMAN [email protected] MIRIAM R. LEDERER [email protected] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 00 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) AGREEMENT CONTAINING ) CONSENT ORDER EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, ) a limited liability company. ) FILE NO. 102 3252 ) The Federal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Page 1 of 21
Case :-cv-00-cjc-jpr Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, SAMEER LAKHANY, et al. Defendants. Case
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 110 Filed 03/22/2006 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:04-cv-00377-JD Document 110 Filed 03/22/2006 Page 1 of 19 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 04-377-JD SEISMIC ENTERTAINMENT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ) CASE NO. ATTORNEY GENERAL ) MICHAEL DEWINE ) JUDGE 30 E. Broad St., 14 th Floor ) Columbus, Ohio 43215 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V.
General David N. Kirkman of the North Carolina Department of Justice. Defendants were
NORTH CAROLINA ::\'... :~\ i L....._... ~ \ IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE WAKE COUNTY nll:.,~..., ~n ".-. \''' I)\ J i.1 I, :; u 1 ',u 1 '-I t SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION File No. 13 CVS 014147 STATE OF
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff VS. LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has reviewed the business practices
2015-CFPB-0033 Document 1 Filed 12/17/2015 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2015-CFPB32 In the Matter of CONSENT ORDER Eric
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU CONSENT ORDER
2015-CFPB-0004 Document 1 Filed 02/10/2015 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2015-CFPB-0004 In the Matter of: CONSENT ORDER NEWDAY
APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS In re: MICHELE GRAHAM, Case No.: 02-43262 (Chapter 7 Debtor. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Adversary Proceeding
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny In the Matter of FILE NO. 132 3272
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Case No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. v. Plaintiff, INTEGRATED CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC.; FLAGSHIP CAPITAL SERVICES CORP.; LIGHTHOUSE CREDIT
CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C. 1679 et. seq.
CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C. 1679 et. seq. Please note that the information contained herein should not be construed as legal advice and is intended for informational purposes only. In addition,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 07-1221 DANIEL D. WEDDINGTON; JAMES R. EARL; MID-CON PETROLEUM, INC., AURORA CAPITAL
Case 2:13-cv-00279-TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
0 JONATHAN E. NUECHTERLEIN General Counsel ROBERT J. SCHROEDER Regional Director NADINE SAMTER, WA Bar # JENNIFER LARABEE, CA Bar # nd Ave., Suite Seattle, WA ( 0- (Samter; ( 0-0 (Larabee Email: [email protected];
COURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. Jennifer Proffitt-Payne,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 5:15-cv-01005 Document 1 Filed 07/01/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Civil Action No. Plaintiff, v. Affinion Group Holdings,
) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN Federal Trade Commission 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 ( -00 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission
This is a special proceeding commenced by the Attorney General of the State of
At Part 6 of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, in and for the County of New York at 60 Centre Street, New York, NY this day of January, 2003 PRESENT: Hon. Eileen Bransten Justice -------------------------------------------------------------------X
Case 2:15-cv-09340 Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION
Case 2:15-cv-09340 Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Sprint Corporation, a
Case 2:13-cv-00143-JAD-GWF Document 193 Filed 06/05/14 Page 1 of 19
Case :-cv-00-jad-gwf Document Filed 0/0/ Page of R. MICHAEL WALLER MEGAN A. BARTLEY Attorneys Federal Trade Commission 00 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Mailstop M-B Washington, D.C. 00 Phone: (0) -0 (Waller)
Case 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM Document 285 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM Document 285 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( Bureau ), through its examiners and other
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU In the Matter of Dealers Financial Services, LLC, Lexington, Kentucky ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 2013-CFPB-0004 CONSENT ORDER The Consumer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, SUN BRIGHT VENTURES LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, CITADEL ID PRO LLC, a Florida
Anna M. Lascurain Deputy Attorney General
PETER C. HARVEY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY 124 Halsey Street Newark, New Jersey 07101 Attorney for Plaintiff Franklin Widmann, Bureau Chief New Jersey Bureau of Securities Anna M. Lascurain Deputy
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: Jul 26, 2010 Catherine A. Lemon District
Case 5:09-cv-04104-JAR Document 391 Filed 07/26/11 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 5:09-cv-04104-JAR Document 391 Filed 07/26/11 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and the STATES OF ILLINOIS, KANSAS, MINNESOTA, and NORTH CAROLINA,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII
STEPHEN H. LEVINS, #3289 1ST ClRCUIT COURT STATE OF HAWAII. FILED' Office of Consumer Protection 235 South Beretania Street, Room 801 APR 28 PM 3:43 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813-2437 Telephone : 586-2636 Attorney
FILED RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2015 ..IAN 2 8 2015
JOHN J. HOFFMAN ACTING A TIORNEY GE't'ERAL OF NEW JERSEY Division oflaw 124 Halsey Street- 5th Floor P.O. Box 45029 Newark, New Jersey 07101 Attorney for Plaintiffs RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2015 TRAVIS L. FRANCIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil No. CONTROLSCAN, INC., ) a corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT
Case 1:14-cv-00652 Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00652 Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION * FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, * * Civil Case No. Plaintiff, * * v.
How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. GARY E. MAES, individually and d/b/a
0423104 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
0423104 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Commissioners: Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman Orson Swindle Thomas B. Leary Pamela Jones Harbour Jon Leibowitz ) In the Matter of )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
In the Matter of: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Alfred C. Toepfer International, Inc. CFTC Docket No. 15-41 Respondent. ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT
Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20580, Plaintiff, v. Case
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS 3rd DIVISION CONSENT JUDGMENT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS 3rd DIVISION STATE OF ARKANSAS ex rei. DUSTIN MCDANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL PLAINTIFF vs. CASE NO. 10-6958 MO' MONEY TAX SERVICE, LLC, MONEY CO. USA, LLC,
Credit Repair Organizations Act
Credit Repair Organizations Act Title IV of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (Public Law 90-321, 82 Stat. 164) is amended to read as follows: TITLE IV--CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS'' Sec. 401. Short title.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission
Case :-cv-0-gms Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Federal Trade Commission v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, American Business Builders, LLC, et al., FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Defendants.
CHAPTER 2--CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS SEC. 2451. REGULATION OF CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS.
CODES COMPLAINTS EMPLOYEE CERTIFICATION FEDERAL LAWS NACSO GUIDELINES LOG OUT CHAPTER 2--CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS SEC. 2451. REGULATION OF CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS. Title IV of the Consumer Credit
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
David W. Lincicum (California Bar No. 223566) Burke W. Kappler (D.C. Bar No. 471936) Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Stop NJ-8122 Washington, D.C. 20580 [email protected] [email protected]
NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION TO THE HONORABLE
By: Mina Wells Deputy Attorney General (973) 648-3762 STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
PAULA T. DOW ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY Division of Law 124 Halsey Street - 5 th Floor P.O. Box 45029 Newark, New Jersey 07101 Attorney for New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs By: Mina Wells Deputy
Michie's Legal Resources. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence Act of 1999. [Acts 1999, ch. 201, 2.
http://www.michie.com/tennessee/lpext.dll/tncode/12ebe/13cdb/1402c/1402e?f=templates&... Page 1 of 1 47-18-2101. Short title. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence
BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION COMBUSTION STORE LIMITED, Complainant, V Docket No. 15-02 UNIGROUP WORLDWIDE, INC., Respondent. OFFER OF JUDGMENT COMES NOW, Respondent UNIGROUP WORLDWIDE, inc. and,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPlAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ZOIS FILED JUL -I A 10: 38 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Plaintiff, v. Intersections Inc., Defendant.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of THE BANCORP BANK WILMINGTON, DELAWARE (INSURED STATE NONMEMBER BANK) CONSENT ORDER AND ORDER TO PAY CIVIL MONEY PENALTY FDIC-11-698b
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) DEFERRED PROSECUTION ) AGREEMENT v. ) ) BIXBY ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) The United
HSHS BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT BACKGROUND AND RECITALS
HSHS BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This HIPAA Business Associate Agreement, ( Agreement ) is entered into on the date(s) set forth below by and between Hospital Sisters Health System on its own behalf and
CONSENT OF DEFENDANT PAUL W. JENNINGS
Case 1:11-cv-00144-RMC Document 1-1 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 100 F. Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20549
DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, V. IMMIGRATION CENTER alk/a U.S. IMMIGRATION
REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement
IN THE MATTER OF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF GEORGIA AND SOUTHLAND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement Agreement ) is entered
