Fundamental Function of Filters for Dams. James R. Talbot, P.E. Consulting Engineer

Similar documents
UNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN

Part 7 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRICS

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

NRCS Overview. National Dam Safety Program Technical Workshop #19 February 22-23, 2012

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS

SE-10 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. Objectives

NJ Interception Drainage

Small Dam Repair The Stone Lake Dam Story. Joe Barron, P.E. SynTerra formerly the Fletcher Group, Inc. 148 River St. Suite 220 Greenville, S.C.

Scheduling Maintenance for Infiltration Basins and Trenches

A perforated conduit such as pipe, tubing or tile installed beneath the ground to intercept and convey ground water. or structures.

Minimizes sediment and debris from entering storm drains that lead to waterways and watercourses.

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

Outlet stabilization structure

METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS

Stormwater/Wetland Pond Construction Inspection Checklist

FAILURE OF TETON DAM

Table 4.9 Storm Drain Inlet Protetion Applicable for

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF SEEPAGE THROUGH EMBANKMENT DAMS (CASE STUDY: KOCHARY DAM, GOLPAYEGAN)

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

9.00 THE USE OF HUNTER LAND DRAINAGE PERFORATED PIPES. Hunter Underground Systems

Storm Drain Inlet Protection for Construction Sites (1060)

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

Riprap-lined Swale (RS)

USE OF GEOSYNTHETICS FOR FILTRATION AND DRAINAGE

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER PIPELINES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

Civil. 2. City of Seattle Supplement to the Specification for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, most current addition.

Welded Mesh Gabions and Mattresses River Protection Design Guide HY-TEN GABION SOLUTIONS Dunstall Hill Trading Estate, Gorsebrook Road,

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

SPECIFICATION FOR PIPE SUBSOIL DRAIN CONSTRUCTION

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

SECTION 55 PIPE FOR STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS (FAA D-701)

SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.

PART 3 DEFINITION OF ROCKFILL VERSUS EARTHFILL MATERIAL

Technical Manual: Plastic Pipe Used in Embankment Dams

Trench Rescue by Buddy Martinette

Local Road Assessment and Improvement Drainage Manual

Full-Scale Laboratory Testing of a Toe Drain with a Geotextile Sock DSO Materials Engineering and Research Laboratory

GUIDELINES FOR SOIL FILTER MEDIA IN BIORETENTION SYSTEMS (Version 2.01) March 2008

Section 2100-Trenching and Tunneling

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD SUBSURFACE DRAIN. (Ft.) CODE 606

SIERRA LAKES COUNTY WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box 1039, Soda Springs, CA (7300 Short Road, Serene Lakes)

Indiana State Department of Health Construction Guidelines for Gravity and Flood-Dose Trench Onsite Systems

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

Interpretation of clogging effects on the hydraulic behavior of ion treated geotextiles

EXPERIMENT 10 CONSTANT HEAD METHOD

DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

Checklist for plans to Construct, Alter or Repair An Individual Subsurface Sewage Disposal System

CHAPTER 18 GROUNDWATER AND SEEPAGE

BMP-7. A sediment filter or an excavated impounding area around a storm drain drop inlet or curb inlet.

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

Part 9 SUBDRAIN DESIGN AND LAYOUT

CLIFTY CREEK PLANT MADISON, INDIANA

Lecture 22 Example Culvert Design Much of the following is based on the USBR technical publication Design of Small Canal Structures (1978)

Watershed Works Manual

Town of Elkton & Cecil Soil Conservation District Checklist for Joint Agency Review Stormwater Management / Erosion and Sediment Control

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

Storm Drain Inlet Protection for Construction Sites (1060)

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

Track Drainage Inspection and Maintenance

Permeable Pavement Construction Guide

Topic 8: Open Channel Flow

PRIVATE TREATMENT CONTROL BMP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE VERIFICATION FORM BIORETENTION FACILITIES, VEGETATED SWALES & HIGHER RATE BIOFILTERS

APPENDIX F. RESIDENTIAL WATER QUALITY PLAN: ALLOWABLE BMP OPTIONS

SECTION EARTH MOVING

February 4, Report Recommendations and NIPSCO Responses. 4.3 Maintaining and Controlling Vegetation Growth

Construction Site Inspection Checklist for OHC By making use of some simple Best Management Practices (BMPs) a construction site operator can

ENVIRONMENTAL CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE BATCH PLANT & ROCK WASHING OPERATIONS

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

APPENDIX G SETTLEMENT

SECTION 5. Sediment Control Measures

Block and Gravel Inlet Protection (BIP)

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

COSMOS 2012: Earthquakes in Action COSMOS 2012

EXPLAINING GROUNDWATER AND WATER WELLS

MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION VOLUME I JANUARY An Equal Opportunity Employer

CHAPTER 7 DRAINAGE OF PAVEMENTS

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (1995 MasterFormat Section 02795)

SECTION PRECAST CONCRETE UTILITY STRUCTURES

Louisiana Administrative Code Title 51 Part XIII. Sewage Disposal

STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

SUDAS Revision Submittal Form

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Division 2 Section Section 02795

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL

geotextile filter design, application, and product selection guide

Drilling Problems. pull

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

CODE OF PRACTICE - VOLUME TWO - TRAIN SYSTEM [CP2] TRANSADELAIDE INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES. Issue: 2 Date: 26/09/08 Page: 1 of 21

Section 402. STORM SEWERS

Transcription:

Fundamental Function of Filters for Dams James R. Talbot, P.E. Consulting Engineer

Introduction Issues related to the formation, and character of a filter cake that stops progression of a concentrated leak requires some explanation of SCS (NRCS) filter study Small gradation difference of filter between success and failure (no transition) Rapid determination of success and failure soil entering the filter is washed on through Filter function of forming a filter cake on the upstream face of the filter preventing a concentrated leak development some characteristics of the filter cake

Introduction Continued Gravelly soil testing differences in response Filters need to be designed for the fine matrix of gravelly soils

Most Failures are Seepage/Piping Related New dam first filling Failed with small amount of water stored in the reservoir Foundation and embankment cracks suspected Dispersive clay soils were involved

Famous dam Failure Started as seepage through cracks in the rock of the right abutment Dam had no filter-drainage zone Teton Dam, Idaho

SCS (NRCS) Performed A Study on Filters 1980 to 1985 the late James L. Sherard worked with SCS to study filters for protection of embankment dams from concentrated leak development caused by erosion in cracks

Sand Testing Basic Properties Schematic of test apparatus for testing the basic properties of sand and gravel filters Uniform sand over graded filter high pressure water source No simulated crack or opening

Void space along apparatus boundary is largest. We used finer material along the circumference of the cylinder forcing failure in the center of the filter

- Performing test for basic properties of filter - High velocity water running through base soil (sand) and filter sieve used to catch particles that get through filter and test for size of these particles

Results show D 15 of filter = 9 times d 85 of base soil (sand) with good correlation results found by changing filter with same base and by changing base with same filter

Findings Basic Properties of Filters using Sand Small filter gradation difference between success and failure Once base soil starts passing through filter, most of the base soil is eroded through in a short time Very good correlation between D 15 of the filter and d 85 of the base soil same as other researchers For sands, D 15 = 9 d 85 or (d 85 = 0.11 D 15 ). Tergazhi used Max D 15 = 5 d 85 for factor of safety about 2 We found thesis by Lund (U of London) - same results For silt and clay soils, used specimen with simulated crack or opening

Grain-size curves of the base soil (sand) used in testing for the basic properties of sand and gravel filters

Grain-size curves of the filters used in the testing program of sand soils

Testing of silts and clays using simulated crack or other opening Started with a slot formed in the compacted specimen of silt or clay with water under high pressure passed through the slot into filter downstream Several arrangements of slots or holes were tried with variable specimen thickness Tests were run horizontal as well as vertical no difference found for horz. or vert. or for specimen thickness vertical used because less complicated Finally settled on using a specimen approximately 1- inch thick with a 1-mm diameter hole and 40 psi water pressure applied we named it the No Erosion Filter Test because for successful tests, there was no visible erosion

Schematic of test apparatus for the slot test. Approximately 40 psi of water pressure was used for high pressure tests. Success or failure of the filter determined very quickly with no doubt

No Erosion Filter Test Setup - For soil with no gravel, the specimen is 1-inch thick and 1- mm diameter hole is made through it - High water pressure (40 psi) is used - Success or failure is determined quickly visually

The No Erosion Test setup Successful filters seal the opening quickly to a drip or no flow

Water under high pressure passes through the simulated crack & the filter Eroded particles of the base soil collect at the filter face and stop flow in the crack Hydraulic Fracturing caused filter cake to extend some distance on each side of the simulated crack Filter beyond no filter cake, open for seepage collection

NRCS Filter Study Eroding soil catches at the face of the filter and seals it The filter face seals at the opening and some distance to each side because hydraulic fracturing from high gradients causes further widening of the seal The remaining filter is open to receive normal seepage (between cracks)

- The soil particles collected at the filter face penetrate only about 1 to 2 mm into the filter for some width beyond the crack - Any particles that penetrate beyond 2 mm into the filter will pass on through with the water

Process for forming filter cake at upstream surface of filter for successful test When pressure is applied to soil specimen with simulated crack, a shot of cloudy water discharges First colloidal particles not caught and pass through Sand (very fine and larger) particles are caught Almost immediately, flow either stops or reduces to a clear drip as Subsequent colloidal particles are caught on the very fine sand and silt. This builds a cake of very low permeability Base soil should have some variance in particle size Filter cake is only about 2 to 3 mm thick with 40 psi on upstream side and no pressure on downstream with very little flow passing through it

Results of filter testing for silts and clays plotted points are boundary between success and failure Boundary shown is beyond all plotted points Can test for your soil and filter combination

A 10-inch diameter apparatus was used for gravelly base soil containing particles up to 2 inches in diameter Test took a little longer because gravel particles armored the hole so erosion was sometimes slower

Filter failure in the large test

Successful filter test for gravelly clay soil in large test Test results show that filter design for gravelly soil must be based on the fine matrix of the soil (the portion passing No. 4 Sieve)

Filter Criteria Table 26-2 Filtering criteria Maximum D 15 Base soil Filtering Criteria Category 1 9 x d 85 but not less than 0.2 mm 2 0.7 mm 3 [40 A / 40 15] [(4 x d 85 ) 0.7 mm] + 0.7 mm A = % passing #200 sieve after regrading (If 4 x d 85 is less than 0.7mm, use 0.7mm) 4 4 x d 85 of base soil after regrading

NRCS Filter Design Document Web Site http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov Click on each in sequence Handbooks Title 210 Engineering National Engineering Handbook Part 633 Soil Engineering Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Gravel Filters

Low pressure slot tests made simulating small flood control dams No flow ever came through Crack filled with soft soil at end High pressure tests on sandy soils with no simulated crack for successful filters was also successful in preventing piping

Summary Successful filters caught eroding particles and formed a filter cake very quickly at the filter face it required a very small amount of erosion (no visible erosion) Unsuccessful filters allowed eroding particles to pass through the filter rapidly so that most of the base soil could be eroded through in a short time A very slight increase in gradation can change the filter from successful to unsuccessful. A safety factor should be used to avoid designing close to the boundary between success and failure Long-term high pressure tests showed successful filters from simulated crack tests were also successful in preventing piping in tests with no cracks

Summary Continued For successful filters, test results indicate the first colloidal particles that reach the filter are not caught and pass through the filter with flowing water Very fine sand and silt particles are caught and subsequent colloidal particles are then caught forming a filter cake with very low permeability The filter cake is formed on the upstream surface of the filter and any particles that penetrate beyond about 2 mm into the filter will pass on through the filter and not be deposited in the filter Filter tests on gravelly soils took slightly longer to form the filter cake because the hole is armored with gravel particles Filter gradation design for gravelly soil must be based on the fine matrix (portion passing the No. 4 sieve)

Summary Continued Tests showed properly graded filters are very effective in clogging cracks or other openings as soil particles are caught at the filter face; preventing development of a concentrated leak and failure The filter is clogged over the width of the crack and for some distance on each side of the opening, but is available for receiving seepage through the pores of the soil with no piping at all other locations There is a narrow boundary between filter failure and success, well defined by D 15 /d 85 = 9 or d 85 = 0.11 D 15 for sandy soils, but the traditional criteria used for many years of D 15 /d 85 = 4 is recommended for a factor of safety of about 2 Other criteria are appropriate for silt or clay base soils. Conservative criteria have been developed for all soils based on a margin of safety beyond the limits of the boundary between success and failure for all tests. A test could be made for a given soil to check for using other gradations

An example of a two-zone filter-drain in a dam

A properly designed filter-drainage zone will prevent development of concentrated leaks through cracks or holes in dams

Filter Construction Placement Methods Keep filter higher than adjacent zones Alignment very important Two bin box works well

Filter Construction Compaction Vibrating roller Specify density or number of passes from test fill Contamination Control Always keep filter zones higher than adjacent zones No traffic over filter zones allowed

Filter Construction Compaction Vibrating roller Specify density or number of passes from test fill Contamination Control Always keep filter zones higher than adjacent zones No traffic over filter zones allowed

As part of filter study, the repair measure was tested in the field using dike to create a small reservoir on upstream of dam

Cross section of dike used to create small reservoir

Piezometers and censors were placed in center trench then it was filled with filter material before filling reservoir with water

Water sensor used with alarm to monitor when water entered trench through cracks

Reservoirs were filled with water

On one test, soil was cleaned off the upstream slope water ran into cracks this picture on similar test in Nebraska

After water was in reservoir for 30 days, excavations made into cracked area and filter

Cracks and filter inspected No water ever entered the filter cracks were full of soft soil no water or wetness D.S. of filter

Filter removed from trench note crack filled with soft soil filter penetrated short distance into crack sensor detected no water

Crack filled with soft soil in Nebraska test

6-inch wide crack filled with soft soil in Nebraska test

One test made where no filter had been installed this test site was excavated after 60 days dam did not fail with no filter

Cracks were found, some were nearly closed from swelling of soil

Excavation into downstream slope of test where no filter was used

In test with no filter, water was found in a crack within 2 feet of downstream slope of the dam, but crack was nearly closed from swelling

Root hole and water in crack near the downstream slope

Seepage Control Structural antiseep collars used in the past Many failures using this method of seepage control Philosophy of anti-seep collars is to stop flow without pressure reduction Picture Courtesy of Danny McCook, NRCS

Filter Diaphragm or Collar For small homogeneous dams, a single filter collar is used instead of structural anti-seep collars If the dam has a chimney drain, that drain can act as the filter collar The collar extends around the pipe and an outlet to the toe is provided

NRCS has set some dimensions for filter diaphragms on conduits through embankment dams Filter Diaphragm Placement

Seepage Control - Filter Diaphragms Filter diaphragms are used instead of collars - placed where they will intercept any areas of poor compaction, cracking, or potential for concentrated leak development Picture Courtesy of Danny McCook, NRCS

Filter Diaphragm Placement Sketch of filter diaphragm in dam Can tie into drainage system of dam if it has one