Early Analysis of Statutory Outcome Measures

Similar documents
Keir Hardie Primary School. Assessment and Marking Policy

St Giles Church of England Primary School

Bridgewater Primary School

Assessment Policy. Date of next review: September 2016

Reading Policy. Contents. 1. Our aim 2. Reading procedures 3. Assessment of reading 4. Phonics 5. Layered approach 6. Guided reading 7.

Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

Assessment in the New National Curriculum

Generic grade descriptors and supplementary subjectspecific guidance for inspectors on making judgements during visits to schools

Knowing Your School. A series of briefing notes for school governors from the National Governors Association produced in association with partners

Hillocks Primary and Nursery School

Assessment and the new curriculum. Parents information evening 2

Ss John Fisher, Thomas More High School Assessment, Reporting and Recording Policy

Roseberry Primary and Nursery School. Maths Policy

Academy Development Plan - Phase 2, years 4-6

Brooklands Primary School School Development Plan

The Heathland School Wellington Road South, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW4 5JD

The Sholing Technology College

What is good progress for children and young people with Special Educational Needs in English and Maths. Interim Advice

Wave 3 Intervention Guide Intervention Briefing Sheets plus Examples of Intervention Monitoring Templates

Key Stage 1 Assessment Information Meeting

HOUNSLOW EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN OUR CHILDREN ARE OUR FUTURE

Greenleaf Primary School Inspection report

Mathematics Policy. Mathematics Policy

Stanbridge Primary School ASSESSMENT POLICY

James Elliman Academy

Ruislip Gardens Primary School

High Halden Church of England Primary School. Early Years Policy

Dartington Church of England Primary School Shinners Bridge, Dartington,, Totnes, Devon, TQ9 6JU

BEBINGTON HIGH SPORTS COLLEGE. Target Setting Policy

Clewer Green CofE First School

Pages 9-16 Show the amount of pupil premium we have received this year and the specific strategies that we intend to utilise.

Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy. Introduction

School Assessment, Recording and Reporting Process

Avanti House School. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. School report. Inspection dates July 2014

Halfway Houses Primary School

New National Curriculum and Assessment. Six Steps to Success for Assessing and Tracking Pupils Progress

Analysis of academy school performance in GCSEs 2014

Knowing Your School. A series of briefing notes for school governors from the National Governors Association produced in association with partners

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Queen Katherine School

Da Vinci Community School

Evaluation schedule for inspections of registered early years provision

Reception baseline: criteria for potential assessments

BEAUFORT and LANGLEY SCHOOL ASSESSMENT RECORDING AND REPORTING

Christ Church Charnock Richard CofE Primary School

KINETON GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL MATHEMATICS POLICY FEBRUARY 2015

St Teresa's Catholic Primary School

COMPLETING THE KEY STAGE DATA COLLECTION GUIDANCE

qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjkl zxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Primrose Hill Primary School Literacy Policy: A baseline for outstanding practice

2016 national curriculum assessments EYFS Early years foundation stage assessment and reporting arrangements (ARA) Published September 2015

Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Assessment Policy

Art (art, craft and design) survey visits

The Diocese of Hallam

Much Birch Primary School

Knowing Your School. A series of briefing notes for school governors from the National Governors Association produced in association with partners

Narrowing the Gaps: from data analysis to impact. A practical guide

Bedford Borough English as an Additional Language (EAL) Strategy ( )

Millfields Community School Learning Environment Policy

Modern Foreign Languages (MFL) Policy 2013

Assessment Policy. Why do we assess?

Assessment, Recording and Reporting

Improving schools. A guide to recent Ofsted reports to support school improvement

Assessment without Levels - Age Related Bands

How To Teach Maths At Maple Primary School

Statistical First Release

Revised GCSE and equivalent results in England, 2014 to 2015

Prettygate Junior School. Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy. Date: Summer 2015 Review: Summer 2018

Data Submission User Manual 2016

All Saints Academy Dunstable

Policy statement: Assessment, recording and reporting achievement.

Pakeman Pupil Premium Grant Expenditure: Report: 2013/14

IMPROVING SERIES IMPROVING ACHIEVEMENT IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Making Foreign Languages compulsory at Key Stage 2 Consultation Report: Overview

The Importance of Phonics: Securing Confident Reading

Update on Progress 8 measure and reforms to secondary school accountability framework

A report on. Johnstown C.P. School Tre Ioan Caerfyrddin SA31 3HS. Date of inspection: May 2011

John Donne CofE Lower School

Briefing on ethnicity and educational attainment, June 2012

St Bede's Catholic High School

Krishna-Avanti Primary School Camrose Avenue, Edgware, HA8 6ES

Assessment and Feedback Policy

St.Dennis CP School. Modern Foreign Languages (MFL) Policy February 2013

Guidance on Baseline Assessment in England

ST. PATRICK'S CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL. Policy on Music

Hillstone Primary School

The New National Curriculum and Assessment. Information for Parents 7.00pm 26 th November 2015

DATA COLLECTION GUIDANCE

Curriculum design, personalisation and raising standards

Our Lady of the Rosary Catholic Primary School

Evidence for Teachers Standards - Guidance

Introduction. Welcome to the EYFS Group Progress Review tool.

Assessment Without Levels

Reforming assessment and accountability for primary schools. Government response to consultation on primary school assessment and accountability

Closing the gap with the new primary national curriculum

St Anne s catholic primary school. Maths 2015

Special Educational Needs & Disability Policy

Good Practice Guidance for gathering on-entry data into the Reception year

Additional Educational Needs and Inclusion Policy and Procedures

SEN Information Report

Transcription:

Early Analysis of Statutory Outcome Measures KS2 National KS2 School KS1 National KS1 School EY National EY School KS2 National KS2 School KS1 National KS1 School EY National EY School KS2 National KS2 School KS1 National 0 50 100 0 50 100 Outcomes for pupils Adding Value Each of the data sections below can be summarised as follows: The majority of pupils start the school in Nursery well below nationally expected levels, very markedly so in the subject specific areas of Reading, Writing and Maths Pupils then leave the Foundation Stage just below national outcomes for Good Level of Development but well below nationally expected levels in reading, writing and number. As a result this demonstrates good progress across this key stage. By the end of year 1 pupils are secure in their phonetic knowledge as the results of the phonics screening check show and are performing above national levels By the end of KS1 results at expected are broadly in line in Maths, above in Writing and below in Reading (based on 2015 national figures, due to assessment changes this outcome could change). Progress from the early years is at least good in all areas By the end of Key stage 2 the school outcomes are above National in all subjects. The % of the cohort working at greater depth at the end of Key Stage 2 potentially is below national for reading and maths but above for writing (a school target for the past 2 years). Thresholds for reading and maths are announced in September. The Pupil Premium Pupil cohort attained above national in Reading, in KS1 School line nationally with Writing but below in Maths. With regard to EY National EY School progress a minimum of 71% progressed at national expectations (it is not possible to compare nationally as there is no data yet on progress 0 50 100 available), again Maths was an issue at expected and above expected levels so will form a target for development. It is also important to note that the Pupil Premium Funding is also being used to address the emotional well-being of the children and to address their vulnerabilities and break down their barriers to learning to ensure they are secondary ready when they leave the school, indeed to enjoy learning for the rest of their lives. As a result of the above and as the graphs show the school cohorts are making excellent progress as they move through school, the gap between national outcomes (green) and school outcomes (red) narrow and then the school cohorts surpass national expected levels by the time they leave the school in all subjects (including SPAG)

2013 National Good level of development (Good in all Prime + Literacy & Maths) = 49% 2014 National Good level of development (Good in all Prime + Literacy & Maths) = 60% 2015 National Good level of development (Good in all Prime + Literacy & Maths) = 61% 2013 = School GLD = 50% so was in line with national (at the time) 2014 = School GLD, 58% so in line with 2014 National figure (at the time) 2015 = School GLD, 55%, so below 2014 National figure (at the time) 2016 = School GLD 63% so above 2015 National figure

- Good progress across the Prime Areas and specific areas - Outcomes in prime areas are well above National providing a sound grounding in learning behaviours for KS1 - GLD % is fluctuating with cohort but is not significantly different from time appropriate national level - Boys GLD = 52%, Girls = 73% - PP = 53% GLD, Non PP 65% so in a large reduction in school gap to 12% from 45% last year - Pupils leave Reception having progressed well since leaving Nursery - Resulting Improvement Targets = To focus on raising attainment in specific areas of reading, writing and number through more specific teaching activities particularly as cohort approaches KS1 Reception and Year 1 teachers to plan transition meetings to discuss needs of vulnerable children/groups (those working in emerging or below the ELGs at the end of Reception). Year 1 teachers to identify and plan for specific groups in need of further support in literacy and mathematics. Year 1 teachers to plan accordingly to support those children that will need to access to enhanced continuous provision. 86% 2015 school = 76% 2014 school = 85% 2013 school = 75% 2015 national = 77% 2014 national = 74% 2013 national = 69% School now performing above 2015 National average Pupil Premium at 79% whereas non PP 96% so gap of 17% is slightly wider than national of 11%. Resulting Improvement Target = To continue to focus on intensive synthetic phonics teaching within lessons and discretely as part of phonics phase groups after lunch and carefully track progress, particularly of PP Pupils, with support interventions implemented where needed. 93% % of Y2 cohort have now achieved pass level for Phonics Screening Check

ATTAINMENT % at each level data comparisons PROGRESS

Attainment at the end of KS1 is higher at expected levels for all subjects from last year. The % at expected is in line with national for Maths and above for Writing but below for Reading. At the higher levels the school is above national for Writing but below for Reading and Maths. Progress from Early Years is very good (see table above at bottom of previous page) In terms of closing the gap, the PP pupils attainment is below their peers by 25% in Maths, 18% in Reading and 29% in Writing. Pupil Premium pupils expected progress from EYFS to KS1 was 100% in Maths and Writing and 89% in Reading (but this was higher than the cohort s 81%). A very impressive closing of the gap The school awaits detailed analysis of APS and performance of groups from further data analysis however early indications of basic KS1 improvement targets are Resulting Improvement Targets = To focus on improving attainment in reading at all ability levels and particularly at HA levels. To ensure children who don t read regularly at home are additionally supported with their reading at school. To become a reading school with increased focus on class reading corners, school displays etc To develop Y2 maths for the HA children

The school outcomes at the expected standard are all above national in all subjects The higher standard is not released until September 2016 but if assume it is a scaled score of 110+ then the school is above national in reading but below in the other subjects Please note: There needs to be a health warning with this data as it rests on a number of unpublished assumptions The progress outcomes at nationally expected levels and also exceeding nationally expected levels are the best the school has ever had! SPAG continues to be above national expected levels The school awaits detailed analysis of APS and performance of groups from further data analysis however early indications of KS2 improvement targets are Resulting Improvement Target = To maintain the increased focus on Writing to ensure attainment is again at least in line with national in 2016. Resulting Improvement Target = To maintain exemplary progress at expected levels through continued close tracking of progress and targeted intervention and support. Resulting Improvement Target = Analysis shows it was the Reasoning papers and particularly Paper 2 that the pupils found hardest so increased teaching & support needed to tackle these style of questions from the start of Key Stage 2

85% of the cohort made at least expected progress in all subjects (R 87%, W-98% & M- 85%). This is less than previous year where expected progress was in the 90% s however the tests are more challenging and the bar has been raised so it is intrinsically more difficult to repeat progress figures from previous years. More than expected progress is very impressive in all subjects (R- 53%, W 49% & M -34%) given the more challenging and harder tests and was similar to previous year in R & W. Resulting Improvement Target = To ensure similar good progress is made in lower Key Stage 2

A minimum of 71% achieved expected progress across all subjects with 93% in writing. The closing of the gap can be seen in the immediate below. Across Key Stage 2 the impact has been on closing the gap in the writing and at higher levels of attainment. Of the 12 children in this cohort 36% made more than expected progress in Reading 50% made more than expected progress in Writing 29% made more than expected progress in Maths 71% of the cohort made at least expected progress in all subjects (R 71%, W- 93% & M 71% 58% of the cohort made more than expected progress in Maths, 67% in Writing and 75% in Maths which is very impressive in all subjects Resulting Improvement Target = Developing Reasoning strategies to support mathematical learning, particularly with the PP Pupils in order to close the mathematical attainment gap.