The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Sewer Overflows In Our Community



Similar documents
Understanding Your An Introduction to the Chicago Area s Combined Sewer Systems

Kansas City s Overflow Control Program

CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet

MARYLAND AVENUE BACKUPS DURING AUGUST 31, 2014 STORM EVENT COMMUNITY OUTREACH

Components of a Basement Flooding Protection Plan: Sewer System Improvements. November 2000

ONTARIO CENTRE FOR MUNICIPAL BEST PRACTICES 200 University Ave., Suite 801, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3C6. BEST PRACTICE SUMMARY REPORT February, 2008

Partnerships in Achieving Green Infrastructure Goals

Capital Improvement Plan City of Houston WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

PREVENTING WET OR FLO ODED BASEMENTS

City of Hillsboro Inflow and Infiltration Elimination Program

BASEMENT FLOODING. Prevention Guide for. Homeowners

SANITARY SEWER BACKUP. Causes & Prevention

Downspout Disconnection Program FAQs

The Clean Water Project What Is The Stormwater Impact?

Lansdowne Stormwater UPDATE

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Mandatory Weeping Tile Disconnection to Reduce the Impact of Basement Flooding

Extreme Wet Weather in Brookfield. How to Keep Your Basement Dry During Heavy Rains and Floods

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY. a guide to PREVENTING SEWER BACKUPS AND FLOODING

FISCAL YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

Rainwater is directed away from walls at surface. Any water infiltrating is captured in drains below foundation

Home Drainage & Causes of Basement Flooding. Water

ELIMINATE STORM WATER FROM ENTERING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS

DRAFT Guidelines for Manually Diverting Outdoor Wastewater to the Sanitary Sewer

M E M O R A N D U M. Among the standard conditions contained in the NPDES permit is also a Duty to

Stormwater management around the world Lessons from Novatech 2010 Dennis Corbett and Marion Urrutiaguer

Protect your home from basement flooding

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SUMMARY

St. Joseph, Missouri Water Protection Homeowners Guide to Your Sewer

ORDINANCE NO. 15 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KANSAS CITY:

PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE, CAPACITY MANAGEMENT & MUNICIPAL PLANNING

The Town of Lakeshore Basement Flooding Information to Residents

C. COMPARATIVE RESEARCH

Protect Your Home From Flooding. A guide for Lethbridge Residents

Basement Valve Program

OVER-HEAD SEWER ASSISTANCE GRANT

Sanitary Sewer Master Plan

Toronto s Wet Weather Flow Master Plan

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

ANALYSIS OF RAINFALL AND ITS INFLOW INTO MOBILE, ALABAMA S, ESLAVA SEWER SHED SYSTEM

Wetrofit Property Flood Assessment

Sanitary Sewer Smoke Testing

Soakage Trenches. A better way to manage stormwater. Thinking Globally and Acting Locally

CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE 7307 AVON BELDEN ROAD NORTH RIDGEVILLE, OH (440)

Using Green Infrastructure to Manage Combined Sewer Overflows and Flooding

Gettysburg Adams Chamber of Commerce Storm Water Management

First in Service First in Safety

Executive Summary Consent Decree

Implementing Green Infrastructure in Atlanta

Thanks to its newly issued federal stormwater permit, Washington,

STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

Green Infrastructure In New Jersey The Current State of Implementation. Prepared for Sustainable Jersey by the Natural Resources Defense Council

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW LONG-TERM CONTROL PLAN Executive Summary

Protect your. home from. basement. have you done everything you can?

SEWER BACKUPS WHAT TO DO AND HOW TO PREVENT

AN UPDATE ON LOUISVILLE MSD s BASEMENT BACKFLOW PREVENTION PROGRAM 10 YEARS AND 6,700 INSTALLATIONS LATER

After the Flush. Safe disposal of our wastewater is a valued and complex, not-for-profit municipal service.

Micromanagement of Stormwater in a Combined Sewer Community for Wet Weather Control The Skokie Experience

Beechmont Park Project

VILLAGE OF GRANVILLE SEWER BACK-UP and WATER LEAK POLICIES

REPORT TITLE: TERM OF COUNCIL PRIORITY NO. 6 - ENHANCE INTEGRITY OF WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INCLUDING FLOOD REMEDIATION PROGRAM

City and County of San Francisco 2030 Sewer System Master Plan TASK 400 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 405

Total Criteria Score Out of a possible 6

Fact Sheet. Basement Flooding - General Information. Visit our Web site at

Managing our Water Resources During Tough Financial Times Now What? John P. McCulloch Oakland County Water Resources Commissioner

Review of Footing Drain Disconnection Projects

How To Get A Flood Risk Reduction Rebate

ecmar SECTION INSTRUCTIONS: Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems

What Our Water s Worth

good to know... SEWER BACKUP A guide to protecting your home

Water Management all about networks

Presentation Agenda. Introduction. Types of Flooding Identifying Flood Risks Property Improvements Additional Resources.

CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP. SANITARY SEWER UPDATE Public Works Committee Meeting September 7, 2010 Curtis Hall

Impact of the ALCOSAN Consent Decree by Steve Morus, Borough Manager

The Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) is a regional

APPENDIX F. RESIDENTIAL WATER QUALITY PLAN: ALLOWABLE BMP OPTIONS

City of Dallas Wastewater Collection System: TCEQ Sanitary Sewer Outreach Agreement City Council Briefing January 17, 2007

HERE COMES THE RAIN AGAIN Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate at the City of Toronto

Chair and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee. Peter M. Crockett, P. Eng., Commissioner of Planning and Public Works

Water Damage A Rising Concern

PART 6 - STANDARD DESIGN AND CALCULATION FORMS 6.1 SANITARY SEWER DATA SHEET

Guidelines for. Permeable Pavement

Understanding Your Sewer System and What You Pay For

City of Atlanta. Department of Watershed Management. Post-Development Stormwater Management Ordinance Summary of Revisions

Weeping Tile Disconnection to Reduce the Impact of Basement Flooding London, Ontario

minimum deductible may be increased significantly.

American Society of Civil Engineers

Almonte Sanitary District Sewer System Management Plan Adopted by the ALMONTE Board of Directors on_08/28/06

MEMORANDUM. Doug Monn, Public Works Director Jim App, City Manager. Matt Thompson, Wastewater Resources Manager. Date: January 24, 2011

CHAPTER 56. PROHIBITED DISCHARGES TO SANITARY OR COMBINED SEWER

Sanitary Sewer Overflow Enforcement : A National Perspective

Number September 2014 SEWER LIABILITY

Impact of July 8, 2013 storm on the City's Sewer and Stormwater Systems

Homeowner s Guide Foundation Water PenetrationTips TIPS TO IDENTIFY WATER PENETRATION PROBLEMS / CRACKING BASEMENTS

RainWise Frequently Asked Questions

A Century of Progress with Pride

Sewer Backup Protection Grant Program. Guidelines, materials and frequently asked questions

Green Infrastructure in Schools: Challenges and Opportunities

JULY 24, 2009 WEST-END FLOODING INVESTIGATION ACTION PLAN. Presentation to Insurance Companies 19 January 2012

Transcription:

The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Sewer Overflows In Our Community March 2012

About MSD Formed in 1954, the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) is the governmental agency that provides wastewater and stormwater management services for all of the City of St. Louis and approximately 80% of St. Louis County. Comprised of 79 separate sewer systems that have been incorporated into one entity over the last several decades, MSD services just under 415,000 single-family residential, multi-family residential, and commercial/industrial accounts. The sewer system MSD manages today is one of the largest and most complex systems in the United States. In terms of wastewater sewers alone, MSD manages the 4th largest system in the nation. To give some perspective on what 4th largest means for our community, consider that MSD s wastewater system is approximately the same size as the wastewater system in Los Angeles, California. Although the two systems are approximately the same size as measured in miles of wastewater sewer pipe system upgrades and operational costs in Los Angeles are shared by over 5 million residents versus approximately 1.4 million in St. Louis. Overall, MSD maintains approximately 6,700 miles of sewers that handle wastewater. Within MSD s service area are two distinct sewer systems that handle wastewater: A combined sewer system that handles both wastewater and stormwater within the same sewer pipe; and a separate, stand alone, sanitary sewer system that is designed to handle only wastewater within the sewer pipe. Depending on what part of MSD s service area you live in, you are either served by a combined sewer system or a separate sewer system. This labyrinth of sewers leads to 7 wastewater treatment plants that treat a combined average of 370 million gallons of wastewater per day. In addition to sewers that in some way handle wastewater, MSD maintains almost 3,000 miles of sewers that handle only stormwater and are not a part of the wastewater collection and treatment system.

Throughout MSD s service area, there are hundreds of points where a combination of rainwater and wastewater discharges into local waterways from the sewer system during moderate to heavy rainstorms. These sewer overflow points act as relief valves when too much rainwater enters the sewer system, and without them, our community could experience thousands of basement backups and/or extensive street flooding. (Even with these overflows points, basement backups can number in the hundreds during particularly heavy rains.) Depending on where sewer overflows are located within MSD s system, they are classified as combined sewer overflows --or--constructed separate sewer overflows. Many of these overflows are a legacy of the way our wastewater systems were first built. Though most overflows predate the District s creation in 1954, they are still MSD s responsibility and efforts to address the problem must continue. From 1992 to 2011, MSD spent approximately $2.5 billion to remove over 350 overflows. Today, the District s work to address sewer overflows and improve water quality continues in the form of a multi-decade, multi-billion dollar capital construction program that was begun in 2003. Different from past capital programs, this current effort is addressing the community s wastewater collection and treatment capabilities on a system wide basis, rather than carrying out improvements one section at a time. This program is a mammoth undertaking that will benefit St. Louisians and the environment for generations to come.

History of Sewer Systems in St. Louis When combined sewers were first built in the St. Louis area in the 1850s, they were considered a major advancement in protecting the public s health and safety. For the first time, wastewater and rainwater could be carried away from major population centers. This in-turn would help protect the community from diseases and flooding, both of which were common in the 19 th century. During the early to mid 1900s, the construction of combined sewers was phased out in favor of separate sewers, so that rainwater and wastewater could be carried in separate sewer pipes. Early sewer systems drained directly into local rivers and streams. However, by the middle to latter part of the 20 th century, the use of wastewater treatment plants started to become the standard for communities throughout the United States, including St. Louis. Wastewater that years earlier would have been discharged directly into local waterways now goes to treatment plants to be cleaned and returned to the environment. In spite of modernday wastewater treatment plants being the standard, both combined and separate sewers still present challenges for our community challenges faced by many cities across the country. When combined sewers were built, they were built with a finite capacity to handle wastewater and rainwater at the same time. (This is true of separate sewers as well all sewers have a capacity limit.) As our St. Louis community developed and grew, valuable green areas were paved over to make way for roads and buildings. These green areas that contained trees, bushes, grass, and other natural surroundings, were no longer available to soak up rainwater during storms in their place was hard concrete or blacktop that cannot absorb rainwater. Thus, the elimination of green space and natural areas has caused combined sewers to handle more and more rainwater and has put additional capacity demands on the system. During rainfalls, so much rainwater can sometimes enter a combined sewer that it becomes overcharged. An overcharged sewer occurs during moderate to severe storms, when high volumes of rain fall during a short period of time.

To avoid potentially thousands of basement backups and/or severe street flooding when combined sewers overcharge, the system will discharge a combination of rainwater and wastewater into local waterways. These overflow points in the combined system are known as combined sewer overflows. The wastewater portion of the separate sewer system was not designed to handle stormwater flows. However, due to a condition known as inflow and infiltration, stormwater can enter portions of the separate sewer system designed to handle wastewater only. This inflow and infiltration of water into the wastewater system can occur through weakened joints that connect sections of sewer pipe and have deteriorated over time. Water can also enter the wastewater system through cracks in the sewer pipe itself that develop with standard usage and age. Additionally, rainwater can enter the wastewater system when downspouts and drains meant to handle stormwater runoff from private property are connected to the wastewater portion of the public sewer system. When too much rainwater enters a wastewater only sewer, the capacity of the system can easily be exceeded and basement backups may occur. To help alleviate these and other capacity issues, overflow points were constructed as part of the separate sewer system. These overflow points in the separate system are known as constructed separate sewer overflows. Constructed separate sewer overflows exist throughout our St. Louis area s separate sewer system and were built to act as relief valves for the wastewater portion of the system during moderate to heavy storms. If an overflow discharges or not is dependent upon a number of factors, including how much rain falls over a given period of time. The result is that not all overflows discharge every time it rains in fact, some overflows will go months or years without discharging. Though both types of overflow points generally have the same function, the distinction between combined sewer overflows and constructed separate sewer overflows is made for engineering and regulatory purposes.

What MSD Has Been & Will Be Doing Sewer overflows are perhaps the biggest challenge facing MSD today. From 1992 to 2011, MSD spent approximately $2.5 billion to remove over 350 overflows. Today, more than 350 overflows remain. Remaining overflows are continuing to be addressed through the current capital program, which was begun in 2003 and will last several decades. MSD is aggressively working to remove each and every constructed separate sewer overflow. However, we must be careful that we do not cause additional basement backups when removing this type of overflow. Therefore, in addition to the construction projects we have completed and are currently building to remove constructed separate sewer overflows, we are thoroughly investigating and planning out the long-term capacity needs of the separate sewer system. It s important that we build the right solution for each and every overflow. Overflows in the combined system are more complicated and possibly more costly to address. Due to engineering and cost limitations, and in accordance with environmental regulations, not all combined sewer overflows will be removed. As such, controlling these overflows is the goal. An example of controlling combined sewer overflows would be to reduce their number and how many times they discharge in a given timeframe. This could involve building deep tunnels that would store stormwater during moderate to heavy rainfalls. Green infrastructure (green roofs, rain barrels, rain gardens, porous pavements, etc.) could also be used to keep stormwater from entering the combined system. Regardless of the method used, the goal is to increase or maintain the volume capacity of the combined system by building larger sewers (i.e., tunnels) or holding back stormwater (i.e., green infrastructure). These are just one of many solutions that will be used to address combined sewer overflows. Over the past two decades, and in conjunction with the State of Missouri, MSD has been developing what is called a Long-Term Control Plan. This plan, which is required by federal and state regulations, serves as a blueprint for how combined sewer overflows will be controlled.

Throughout the United States, hundreds of communities are dealing with the challenges of combined sewer overflows. As part of its Long-Term Control Plan development efforts, MSD reviewed what other communities have done to control their combined sewer overflows and what engineering technologies they have used. However, engineering solutions that worked in other communities may not work in St. Louis ours is a very unique system that requires very unique solutions. In August 2009, MSD submitted its Long-Term Control Plan to regulators. To develop this plan, the District engaged the public through open houses, presentations to business, community, environmental and municipal groups, meetings with key stakeholders and much more. The plan submitted to regulators reflected the feedback obtained from these stakeholders. The plan calls for reducing the number of combined sewer overflows along the Mississippi River s tributaries and for enhancing green infrastructure in areas where combined sewer overflows discharge directly into the river. We estimate the price tag for this plan to be about $1.9 billion. The plan received regulatory approval in 2011. Implementing the Long Term Control Plan will require tremendous effort that will only be matched if not outpaced - by a concurrent, yet separate program, to remove our system s constructed separate sewer overflows. These are the overflows that are located in the part of the system where the wastewater and stormwater systems are separate. Addressing overflows in the separate area is more straightforward than addressing overflows in the combined area - the Federal Clean Water Act of 1972 is very clear in that all constructed separate sewer overflows must be eliminated. The challenge in this part of our system is again capacity related, but storage and green infrastructure are not the solutions. Overflows in the separate system are addressed through the sealing of weakened joints connecting sections of sewer pipe; rehabilitation of cracked and aging pipes; and disconnection of downspouts and stormwater drains from the separate sanitary system. In short, stopping rainwater from entering the separate sanitary sewer system leads to

the elimination of separate sewer overflows and because the solution is the same for both addresses basement backups. Legal Agreement In June 2007, the State of Missouri and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) filed a lawsuit against MSD over the status of the overflows just described. The State of Missouri and EPA were later joined by the Missouri Coalition for the Environment. Since December 2008, MSD has been in mediation with these parties regarding the lawsuit. In August 2011, EPA announced a settlement agreement that calls for MSD to spend a minimum of $4.7 billion over the next 23 years to address sewer overflows in our community. When complete and aside from sustaining or creating tens of thousands of local jobs this work will help protect our natural environment and local community from a combination of rainwater and sewage that is discharged into area waterways during moderate to heavy rains a discharge that can annually measure in the billions of gallons. All parties have worked hard and showed great understanding to reach an agreement that continues to ensure the public s health and safety, protects our St. Louis area waterways from unnecessary sewer overflows, and allows for robust investment in our region s infrastructure and local economy. The August 2011 agreement is currently before the United States Federal Court. However, the State of Missouri is not a party to the settlement agreement and the Court must rule on the disposition of their status. MSD s spending of $2.5 billion over the past two decades to eliminate 350- plus sewer overflows, reflects an understanding that there has never been any question about the need for continued work to upgrade and modernize the nation s 4th largest sewer system. Rather, the true question is how quickly this work is completed, which is the driver behind continued increases in monthly sewer bills. While $4.7 billion over 23 years is a very fair agreement when compared to the dozens of other cities across the nation that have been sued by the Federal Government, the fact remains that this is billions of dollars that

will come from the pocketbook of St. Louis ratepayers with little to no state or federal assistance and will be unavailable for other critical needs in our community. To assist those struggling with their bills, MSD has in place a Low Income Assistance Program for qualified low-income, elderly, and disabled customers. Recently this program has been expanded to include tenants and reach a portion of the St. Louis community previously ineligible for this assistance. Qualified customers will receive a rate reduction equal to 50 percent of the current charges on their monthly sewer bill. Beyond the regulatory issues, the St. Louis sewer system like much of the infrastructure in our region is very old and in need of investment and upgrades. As MSD works to implement the requirements of the August 2011 agreement, we will seek to highlight the need for renewed investment in all types of infrastructure, so that future generations may reap the same, if not greater, benefits that current and past generations have enjoyed. The Public s Role It is important that the public be made aware of sewer overflows and their impact on our environment. Regardless of where one lives within MSD s service area, we all share the same environment. And we all have the same concerns and goals for the type of environment that we leave for future generations. In addition to the current capital program, which will help alleviate or remove many overflows throughout the District s service area, MSD is working to educate the public on the issue of overflows. Part of this education is the placement of signs in multiple areas that could be impacted by active overflows. Required by the EPA, the signs clearly state that the structure the placard is attached to is an overflow point and during rainfalls a combination of wastewater and stormwater might be discharged into the surrounding environment. For overflow points where no easily identifiable structure exists, the signage is posted nearby.

As part of these ongoing efforts to educate and inform the public, MSD will also be introducing new features from time to time on its website at www.stlmsd.com. These features will be a part of larger community outreach efforts designed to engage the public on wastewater and stormwater issues that affect our entire community.

If you have any further questions about sewer overflows in our community or this brochure, please contact MSD s Customer Service Center at (314) 768-6260 or visit www.stlmsd.com. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District 2350 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63103-2555 (314) 768-6397