Coconino Community College Online Course Review Form



Similar documents
HCC Online Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011

Teaching and Learning Standards and Principles

HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1

Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template

Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy

Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2

Del Mar College, Corpus Christi, TX Department of Mathematics. Course: ID: Instructor:

Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed and

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

THE CHECK. academic. A Guide to Online Course Design. What aspects of course design does The Check address? How can The Check be used?

The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design

GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS

As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course.

Online Course Self-Assessment Form

University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review

Online Course Development Guide

Standards for Quality Online Courses Educational Technology Cooperative

Best Practices and Review Standards for Online Instruction. Recommended Best Practices for Online Instruction

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES

Online Course Standards Rubric

Hybrid course/blended Instruction an individual course in which some face-to-face instruction is replaced with distance learning.

QUALITY ASSURANCE OF ONLINE LEARNING

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

Quality Standards for Online Learning

Checklist for Evaluating Online Courses

MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT

Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final

Criteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses

Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric

inacol Standards of Quality for Online Courses

COURSE ADMINISTRATION

Cowboy Quality Online Course Evaluation (Title III) Version 3.0 Course Title Goes Here Total Score=0%

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCE ONLINE COURSE QUALITY MANAGEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines

Best Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design

Guide to Best Practices in Online Teaching. Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College. Revised November 2012

1. Standard I: Content Knowledge, Skills, and Concepts for Instructional Technology

National Standards of Quality for Online Courses

Texas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy

DESIGNING ONLINE COURSES TO PROMOTE STUDENT RETENTION

EDU Fall 2010 Course Syllabus Instructional Design for Online Learning Instructor: Faculty Bio button Contact Policy:

MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines

Distance Education Handbook

Eagle Learning Online Policies & Procedures

Designing and Developing a Quality Online Course Faculty Reference Guide

Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses

A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses.

Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching

Quality Enhancement Plan Submitted to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools On-Site Review - September 20 22, 2011 (Revised QEP Document)

ECU Quality Assurance Guidelines for Online Delivery

Course Standards. Support Standards. Institutional and Administrative Standards

Course Development Resource Guide. Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

Community College System of New Hampshire

STEP ONE Work with instructor to develop/redesign course and fill out sections I VII. COURSE DEVELOPMENT or REVISION Course Information

TVCC Distance Learning Faculty Handbook. Distance Learning. Faculty Handbook. 1 P age

PRODUCTION STAGE PRE-LAUNCH STAGE LAUNCH STAGE. knowledge or content. skills. advises on pegagogy and course design to.

Guidelines for Massachusetts Early Educator Preparation Programs Participating in the Early Childhood Educator Scholarships Program.

!"#$%&'()$*)"#%+,'%-"."/,&*01%% (0-%-"/*."'*01%,0/*0"%*0#$'2)$*,0% ($%$3"%40*."'#*$5%,+%6"00"##""%7%80,9.*//"%

Ch. 354 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS 22 CHAPTER 354. PREPARATION OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL CATEGORY PROGRAM DESIGN

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. Online Course Design Guidelines for Faculty

Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric

Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses. The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated.

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

How To Write A Rubric For Online Instruction

UW-La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS

Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Handbook

CTL Online Workshop Program Referral Resource Sheet

MUH 3016 Survey of Jazz Winter Session Credit Hours, Online Course

Strengthening the Role of Part-Time Faculty in Community Colleges

QUALITY SCORECARD FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF ONLINE EDUCATION PROGRAMS

REFLECTIONS ON ONLINE COURSE DESIGN - QUALITY MATTERS EVALUATION AND STUDENT FEEDBACK: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

I. PREREQUISITE For information regarding prerequisites for this course, please refer to the Academic Course Catalog.

Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

South Georgia State College Distance Learning Policy

Suggest the following information be placed on bottom of Policy page, space permitting, or on last page of

Final Project Design Document Stacy Mercer

Schneps, Leila; Colmez, Coralie. Math on Trial : How Numbers Get Used and Abused in the Courtroom. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, p i.

Transcription:

Coconino Community College Online Course Review Form This review rubric is divided into two areas: Essential (ES) and Secondary. (SS) (ES) Essential are standards that every online course must meet to pass this review. (SS) Secondary are standards that are also important but not essential. An online course would also need to meet at least 74% (17/23) of the Secondary to pass this review. Course: Submitted by: Date: I. COURSE OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION (ES) I.1 Navigational instructions make the organization of the course easy to understand. (ES) I.2 A statement introduces the student to the course and to the structure of the student learning and, in the case of a hybrid course, clarifies the relationship between the face-to-face and online components

(ES) I.3 Minimum technology requirements, minimum student skills, and, if applicable, prerequisite knowledge in the discipline are clearly stated (SS) I.4 The self-introduction by the instructor is appropriate and available online (SS) I.5 Students are requested to introduce themselves to the class (SS) I.6 Etiquette expectations with regard to discussions, email, and other forms of communication are stated clearly

II. LEARNING OBJECTIVES (ES) II.1 The course learning outcomes are clearly stated and measurable (ES) II.2 The module/unit learning are measurable and consistent with the course level outcomes (ES) II.3 Instructions to students on how to meet the learning outcomes are adequate and stated clearly (SS) II.4 The module/unit learning address content mastery, critical thinking skills, and core learning skills

III. ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT (ES) III.1 The types of assessments selected measure the stated learning objectives and are consistent with course activities and resources (ES) III.2 The course grading policy is stated clearly (ES) III.3 Specific and descriptive criteria are provided for the evaluation of students work and participation (SS) III.4 The assessment instruments selected are sequenced, varied, and appropriate to the content being assessed

(SS) III.5 Self-check, peer review, or practice types of assignments are provided for students IV. RESOURCES AND MATERIALS (ES) IV.1 The instructional materials support the stated learning outcomes (ES) IV.2 The instructional materials; i.e. assignments, assessments and discussions have sufficient depth for the student to learn the subject.

(ES) IV. 3. All resources and materials in the course are appropriately cited (SS) IV.4 The instructional materials are logically sequenced and integrated (SS) IV.5 The purpose of each course element is explained V. LEARNER ENGAGEMENT (ES) V.1 The learning activities promote the achievement of stated learning objectives

(ES) V.2 Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability (turnaround time for email, grade posting, etc.) (ES) V.3 The requirements for course are clearly articulated (SS) V.4 Learning activities foster instructor-student, content-student, and if appropriate to this course, student-student interaction (SS) V.5 The course design prompts the instructor to be active and engaged with the students

VI. COURSE TECHNOLOGY (ES) VI.1 The tools and media support the learning objectives, and are appropriately chosen to deliver the content of the course (ES) VI.2 Technologies required for this course are either provided or easily downloadable (SS) VI.3 The tools and media enhance student interactivity and guide the student to become a more active learner (SS) VI.4 The course components are compatible with existing standards of delivery modes

(SS) VI.5 The course design takes full advantage of available tools and media VII. LEARNER SUPPORT (ES) VII.1 The course instructions articulate or link to a clear description of the technical support offered (ES) VII.2 Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the institution s academic support system can assist the student in effectively using the resources provided; i.e. the Learning Enhancement Center and Library Services

(SS) VII.3 Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the institution s student support services can assist the student in effectively using the resources provided; i.e. admissions, registration, career services VIII. ACCESSIBILITY (ES) VIII.1 The ADA statement is clearly visible in the footer of every course homepage and will include a link to student DR accommodations. (ES) VIII.2 Course pages and course materials will make every reasonable attempt to provide equivalent alternatives to auditory and visual content

(SS) VIII.3 Course pages have links that are self-describing and meaningful (SS) VIII.4 The course demonstrates sensitivity to readability issues Final comment Box: Now that you've looked at the entire course, please share your reflections on the degree of coherence of the course as a whole and its potential to promote student learning. Total Secondary met (17/23 required): Does course pass all Essential? If no, which essential standards does the course not meet: