2013-2014 School Progress Report



Similar documents
21st. 55th. 65th. 23rd. 21st. 59th. 59th. 22nd. 29th. 10th. New Media Technology Charter School School Progress Report.

Philadelphia City SD. Kensington Culinary Arts Required Federal Reporting Measures Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

State of New Jersey

School Levels of Support. By Dr. Kristine Harms

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL WARREN 1500 ROUTE 57 WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL

School Report Card. School Report Card Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This report contains:

Latinos in Massachusetts Public Schools: Holyoke

NYC DOE S COLLEGE AND CAREER READY BENCHMARKS. Graduate NYC! Community Best Practices Forum October 1, 2012

State of New Jersey

College and Career Readiness Section

Pennsylvania School Performance Profile

Philadelphia Accelerated Schools

State of New Jersey

Holyoke Public Schools Local Stakeholder Group (LSG)

Action Plan v2.0. School District of Philadelphia. We are making our schools great. Join us. February 17, 2014 OVERVIEW

PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL PERFORMANCE PROFILE Frequently Asked Questions

School Quality Guide / HS Summary of Section Ratings

Enabling & Supportive Legislation

Technical Processes used to Develop Colorado School Grades for Alternative Education Campuses

Latinos in Massachusetts Public Schools Springfield

State of the Schools Report Archdiocese of Boston Catholic Schools. June 2014

One City, Two Systems of Schools A Look at Philadelphia Schools Using Pennsylvania School Performance Profiles

State of New Jersey

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW SCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY AND TOURI PASSAIC 150 PARK AVENUE PATERSON CITY

Alabama State Board of Education PLAN 2020

State of New Jersey

LOUISIANA SCHOOLS PROFILE RE-IMAGINING TEACHING AND LEARNING

Atrisco Heritage Academy High

IDAHO CONNECTS ONLINE SCHOOL

Annual Report on Curriculum Instruction and Student. Achievement

Bethel Park School District. Bethel Park Online Academy Handbook

Georgia s Technology Literacy Challenge Fund Grant Application. Bremen City Schools. Section 3: Grant Proposal

SPRING-FORD IS MAKING EVERY DAY COUNT! Dr. David Goodin Spring-Ford Area School District Year In Review

IHE Master's of School Administration Performance Report Fayetteville State University

Advanced Analytics Leading to New Insights into College Readiness in Fort Worth ISD

Proficiency-Based Transcript DESIGN FEATURES + CONSIDERATIONS

2013 SAT Report on. College & Career readiness

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW SCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY & TOURISM PASSAIC 150 PARK AVENUE PATERSON CITY

Connecticut College and Career Readiness Toolkit Supplemental Data Central High School

Excellence. Education. 3-Year Strategic Plan Version 4.7

Accountability Update

New Jersey High School Performance Ranking - A Summary

A Parent s Guide to School Accountability in Kentucky

Frequently Asked Questions Contact us:

AP Student Success in PA Schools - Latest Trends

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center

SDP COLLEGE-GOING DIAGNOSTIC. The School District of Philadelphia

District Demographic Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Purpose of Report: To inform the Board of the 2013 District demographics.

STUDENT PLACEMENT GUIDE: DETERMINING PLACEMENT WITH GRADE LEVEL PROFICIENCIES

JUST THE FACTS. Phoenix, Arizona

Expanding PK-12 Access to IB: The Chicago Project. July 24, 2015

SCHOOL PROGRESS INDEX Data Release

HB5 Foundation High School Programs

TEXAS SCHOOLS PROFILE RE-IMAGINING TEACHING AND LEARNING

Field Guide for the Principal Performance Review. A Guide for Principals and Evaluators

Richard Wright PCS for Journalism and Media Arts

IHE Masters of School Administration Performance Report

OAPCS Statewide Data Analysis for the Ohio State Report Card

Hartford Public Schools

Core Goal: Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

This document is intended to clarify the specifics of those proposals and to answer common questions received thus far.

Connecting Education and Economic Development

Identified Needs Based on Data

REPORT CARD THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANNUAL SCHOOL. Airport High School 1315 Boston Avenue West Columbia, SC RATINGS OVER 5-YEAR PERIOD YEAR

IKF Administrative Regulation

School Performance Framework: Technical Guide

Polk State Chain of Lakes Collegiate High School (COL) School Improvement Plan (SIP)

. / +,,-! " # $ % & ' ( % )* +,,-

Policy Capture for Setting End-of-Course and Kentucky Performance Rating for Educational Progress (K-PREP) Cut Scores

ICAP Indicators Worksheet 2011 Milestones for ICAP Progress

BEST PRACTICES IN INTERVENTION & REMEDIATION

collegeready.rice.edu

(If your school has an International Baccalaureate (IB) program, ask the following :)

How To Get A High School Diploma

Engaging Families: Answering K-12 Family Questions About College To Career Readiness

SAMPLE MATERIAL: Evaluation Questions That Are Aligned With Program Objectives

Action Plan v1.0. The School District of Philadelphia. January 7, 2013

Our Challenge: Graduating Students College & Career Ready The Long Island Regional Advisory Council on Higher Education January 31, 2013

Practices Worthy of Attention YES College Preparatory School Houston Independent School District Houston, Texas

Hiawatha Academies School District #4170

Frequently Asked Questions: Performance Management Framework

SB Individual Graduation Committees Frequently Asked Questions

Strong Results, High Demand:

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Theory of Action Statements - Examples

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Comal ISD Bilingual & ESL Program Evaluation. Where Excellence is an Attitude!

CREATING A P-20 CONTINUUM OF ACTIONABLE ACADEMIC INDICATORS OF STUDENT READINESS

IDAHO STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION CY FY Strategic Plan An Idaho Education: High Potential High Achievement

Increasing access for diverse schools and students

Michigan Department of Education. Earning College Credit in High School. A Synopsis of Opportunities

Program Quality Indicators. The Undergraduate Business Program

Project EASIER

South Carolina State Report Card

A study of the effectiveness of National Geographic Science

Higher Performing High Schools

JUST THE FACTS. Missouri

Comprehensive Plan. for. World Class Schools

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for

Assessing the Success of Specific GEAR UP Components:

Transcription:

2013-2014 School Progress Report Kensington Health Sciences Academy Governance Address Phone / Fax Website District 2463 Emerald St. Philadelphia, PA 19125 215.291.5185 / 215.291.6320 www.philasd.org/schools/kensingtonhealthsciences Report Type High School Enrollment 392 Grade Range 9-12 Admissions Category Neighborhood Turnaround Model N/A Welcome The School Progress Report (SPR) provides parents, families, and community members with valuable information on the progress schools are making towards citywide goals. Each school receives a score and a corresponding performance tier at the overall and domain levels. Each school also receives two rankings: one within all schools of the same grade configuration (City Rank) and one within a peer group of schools with similar student demographics (Peer Rank). A school is designated a City Leader if it ranks first among all schools with the same grade configuration. A school is designated a Peer Leader if it ranks first in its peer group. Scoring Summary TIER: INTERVENE (0-24%) WATCH (25-49%) REINFORCE (50-74%) MODEL (75-100%) OVERALL A school's overall score represents its combined performance on the Achievement, Progress, Climate, and College & Career (for high schools only) domains. Score 12% Performance Tier INTERVENE City Rank Peer Rank (Gap to Leader) (Gap to Leader) 62nd of 71 19th of 27 (-70) (-53) Achievement The Achievement domain measures performance on standardized assessments, including PSSA, Keystone Exams, ACCESS for ELLs, and reading assessments. 2% INTERVENE 66th of 70 23rd of 27 (-82) (-36) Progress The Progress domain measures growth on standardized assessments and progress towards graduation (for high schools only). 13% INTERVENE 59th of 71 (-71) 20th of 27 (-59) Climate The Climate domain measures school climate and student and parent/guardian engagement. 26% WATCH 55th of 72 15th of 28 (-74) (-52) College & Career The College & Career domain measures college and career readiness and post-secondary outcomes. 12% INTERVENE 62nd of 70 18th of 26 (-86) (-73)

Achievement Scored Range and Metric Score Percentage Earned Points Earned ( u ) First-Time Pass Rate 0.24 out of 6.00 Re-Test Pass Rate 0.03 out of 3.00 % Advanced 0.00 out of 0.60 First-Time Pass Rate 0.06 out of 6.00 Re-Test Pass Rate 0.12 out of 3.00 % Advanced 0.00 out of 0.60 First-Time Pass Rate 0.00 out of 6.00 Re-Test Pass Rate 0.06 out of 3.00 % Advanced 0.00 out of 0.60 Page 2

Achievement (Cont'd.) Scored Range and Metric Score Percentage Earned Points Earned ( u ) ACCESS for ELLs: % 4.5 or Above 0.23 out of 1.20 TOTAL 0.74 out of 30.00 Page 3

Progress Scored Range and Metric Score Percentage Earned Points Earned ( u ) Average Growth Index (AGI) 0.46 out of 6.50 Average Growth Index (AGI) 0.00 out of 6.50 Average Growth Index (AGI) 0.91 out of 6.50 ACCESS for ELLs: % Growth in 75th Percentile or Above Insufficient Sample 997.00 out of 997.00 % of On-Track Students Earning Credits Required for Promotion 0.48 out of 8.00 % of Off-Track Students Earning Credits Required for Promotion 1.74 out of 6.00 Page 4

Progress, on Equity Scored Range and Metric Score Percentage Earned Points Earned ( u ) AGI for Lowest-Performing 20% of Students Insufficient Sample 997.00 out of 997.00 AGI for Lowest-Performing 20% of Students Insufficient Sample 997.00 out of 997.00 AGI for Lowest-Performing 20% of Students 1.10 out of 1.50 TOTAL 4.69 out of 35.00 Page 5

Climate Scored Range and Metric Score ( u ) Percentage Earned Points Earned % of Students Attending 95% or More of Instructional Days 0.00 out of 8.00 Within-Year Retention Rate 1.92 out of 4.00 Across-Year Retention Rate 1.32 out of 4.00 % of Students with Zero In-School Suspensions 1.00 out of 1.00 % of Students with Zero Out-of-School Suspensions 0.93 out of 3.00 Parent/Guardian Survey: Participation Rate Parent/Guardian Survey: Climate Rating (4-point scale: 1.00 low to 4.00 high) Student Survey: Climate Rating (4-point scale: 1.00 low to 4.00 high) TOTAL 5.17 out of 20.00 Page 6

College & Career Scored Range and Metric Score ( u ) Percentage Earned Points Earned Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rate 1.20 out of 6.00 First-Fall College Matriculation Rate 0.00 out of 4.00 AP/IB: % of 12th-Graders Scoring 3 (AP)/4 (IB) or Higher on an Exam ACT/SAT: % of 12th-Graders Scoring College & Career Readiness Benchmark FAFSA Completion Rate TOTAL 1.20 out of 10.00 Page 7

Educator Effectiveness Teacher effectiveness measures are being described in the School Progress Report, but not included in the SPR rating, to share data we are gathering to monitor and support teacher practice. This information is also used to develop responsive and customized professional learning for teachers to ensure that all students have access to great teachers. Here are some important details to contextualize the teacher effectiveness data reported in the SPR. n n n Teachers in a formal observation year who fail to receive a required observation receive a default observation score of 2 (Proficient) for any missing observation data, which may inflate the overall scores. Until district-wide, inter-rater reliability norming is held for all principals, observation scores may vary significantly across schools and observers. As a result, comparisons of scores between schools may not be meaningful. The district's observation tool evaluates 10 components of the Danielson Framework for Teaching. Therefore, comparing SDP's observation scores to scores evaluated against all 22 components of the Danielson Framework may not be meaningful. Percentage of Teachers Receiving an Effectiveness Rating of Distinguished (8 of 23 teachers in this school were in a formal observation year) 0% Percentage of Teachers Receiving an Observation Score of Distinguished in Instruction (8 of 23 teachers in this school were in a formal observation year) 0% Percentage of Teachers Attending 95% or More of Days 78% Student Survey: Student Perception of Teacher Practice (1 of 383 students in this school completed the survey) (4-point scale: 1.00 low to 4.00 high) Insufficient Sample Page 8