Unitary Plan - Biodiversity

Similar documents
Heritage Place Code. Heritage Place Code

Guide to agrichemical use in Resource Management Plans Northland Region as at October 2011

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

23.1 RENEWABLE ENERGY

Q&A: Resource Legislation Amendment Bill 2015

Protecting the Urban Forest

An Introduction to Conservation Covenants. A Guide For Developers and Planning Departments

Ecological Restoration Zones to Rebuild

CONSERVING OUR RURAL ENVIRONMENT

Conservation Banking Incentives for Stewardship

Coventry Development Plan 2016 Appendix 89. Glossary of Key Terms

2.50 Retirement villages - section 32 evaluation for the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan

Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

BEST PRACTICE NOTE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT 10.1 NZILA. Members Documentation

CONNECTIVITY CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION ADVENTURES IN A GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT

Improving the physical condition of Scotland s water environment. A supplementary plan for the river basin management plans

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

2.1 Environmental Responsibility & Land Capability

Section 5: Conserve to Enhance Program Goals What is Conserve to Enhance All About?

Environmental Review Process

Aiding the Hydro-scheme development process. Web-links to useful information sources

Biological Diversity and Tourism: Development of Guidelines for Sustainable Tourism in Vulnerable Ecosystems

PROPERTY TAX RELIEF PROGRAMS

SUPPLEMENTARY EVIDENCE OF SHONA CLAIRE MYERS ON BEHALF OF THE KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL. Terrestrial ecology. DATE: 3 February 2012

Development proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-

Sustainable Coastal Management: Policy recommendations to political parties contesting the 2015 NSW Election

Creating Green Jobs within the Environment and Culture sector.

33 CFR PART 332 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION FOR LOSSES OF AQUATIC RESOURCES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ; 33 U.S.C. 1344; and Pub. L

Natural Resource Management Profile

Planning Consultant Simon Cocker Landscape Architect. Dr Tim Lovegrove Avian Fauna Dr Mark Seabrook- Specialist, Natural Heritage

Biodiversity principles

2008 Compensatory Mitigation Rule: Overview and Highlights. Jenny Thomas U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Division July 2014

AUGUST Habitat compensation under the Biodiversity Conservation Strategy

Rural Development Strategy Network Utilities: Issues and Options

Protected Area Categories and Management Objectives

Payments for Ecosystem Services: towards improved biodiversity conservation and water security in South Africa, a semi-arid, developing country

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

Marine Protected Areas Policy and Implementation Plan

As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing

Chapter 3 Land Use and Development Strategy Hearing Report

Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

Multiple Species Conservation Program County of San Diego. A Case Study in Environmental Planning & The Economic Value of Open Space

Chapter 1b - Priority Map Development

Guidelines. for a Native Vegetation Significant Environmental Benefit Policy for the clearance of scattered trees. Approved August 2007

MOUNT BARKER (DC) DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity

The Roaches Asset Management Review. Draft Objectives for External Consultation. Fundamental Principles

Different Types of Marine Protected Area

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

How To Write A New Bill On Flood Management In Scotland

Green Infrastructure Case Study Template

7.9.2 Activity Table 1 General Rural Zone, Countryside Living Rural Zone, (excluding the Okura Policy Area), Countryside Living Town Zone

Explanatory Memorandum to the Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) Regulations 2012

Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500, , ,040-39%

Tree Management Guidelines

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

CHAPTER 2: APPROACH AND METHODS APPROACH

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Global Ecology and Wildlife Conservation

Longboat Dr Noeleen Smyth. Pitcairn S, W. UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot 87

Briefing for Conservation Budget Bilateral

Waterway Technote Planning

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards

Latitude 32 Planning Policy 1 - Strategic Planning (Final for Advertising - October 2014)

American Forest Foundation (AFF) Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Protected Areas on Private Land: Shaping the Future of the Park System in Australia

Daryl Henehan, Consent Planner Natural Resources. JOHN AND RIA WILMS - REPORT REP Report prepared for hearing of 3 May 2010

Wildlife Ecologist. Mount Gibson Wildlife Sanctuary

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs). Guidelines for their Identification, Selection and Designation

Macro water sharing plans the approach for unregulated rivers

>> BRIEFING TO THE INCOMING MINISTERS

Australian Government Response to the Senate Committee on Finance and Public Administration

One Major Six Concentrations. Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst

Ecological Restoration Strategies for Cattle Ranching Landscapes of the Azuero

Permitted clearing of native vegetation Meeting the moderate and high risk-based pathway application requirements

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

Our Environment, Our Future

Decision Memo. Restore Act Land Acquisition

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

Flood Risk & Surface Water Management. Page 1 of 20

Aquatic Biomes, Continued

Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon. fact SHEET

The current institutional and legal context for biodiversity conservation and management is characterised by the following features:

Cellular Antenna Proposal Form

Climate Change and Sri Lanka. Ajith Silva Director/ Policy and Planning Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Sri Lanka

NATURAL RESOURCES DEGREES AND CERTIFICATES. Environmental Conservation A.S. Degree (formerly Natural Resources)

Global Environment Facility GEF OPERATIONAL PROGRAM #13 ON CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IMPORTANT TO AGRICULTURE

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Australian Antarctic Science Strategic Plan to Stream Implementation Plan November 2013

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project


Transcription:

Unitary Plan - Biodiversity

Today s Presentation Key biodiversity objectives and policies Focus on terrestrial Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) Rules Key differences in rules from legacy plans Implications of changes to RMA

Overview Biodiversity Objectives and Policies Most biodiversity objectives and policy at RPS level: Biodiversity 2.4.3.4 Coastal 2.7 Waitakere Ranges 2.4.3.5 Trees and Vegetation 2.4.3.3 Some at Regional/District Plan level Auckland Wide Vegetation Management 3.1.3.15 Auckland Wide Water Quality 3.1.3.16.1 Auckland Wide Lakes, rivers and wetland man. 3.1.3.8 Subdivision (incl. TDRs) 3.1.4

Overview RPS provisions - Objectives Protect significant biodiversity Protect and enhance life supporting capacity of coastal ecosystems Encourage restoration and legal protection of significant biodiversity Protect and restore in Waitakere Ranges and HG Recognise contribution of trees and veg to heritage and character Maintain and enhance cover of trees and groups of trees

Regional and District Plan Objectives Lakes, rivers, streams and wetlands are protected from permanent loss Values of vegetation in sensitive environments and areas of contiguous native vegetation cover maintained while providing for reasonable use and development Contribution to the natural character values of the coast is maintained. Incentives are available for the protection of some SEAs

Biodiversity Policies Identify significant areas [Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) overlay terrestrial, freshwater, marine] Identify other areas [riparian, coastal, contiguous vegetation] Manage effects on biodiversity SEAs and other avoid, remedy, mitigate, offset Recognise and provide for mana whenua relationship, including kaitiakitanga

Significant Ecological Areas Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) have been identified on land, in freshwater environments, and in the CMA. RMA Sections 6(c), 30 and 31 (maintenance of indigenous biodiversity) Auckland Plan Directive 7.5: protect ecological areas, ecosystems and areas of significant indigenous biodiversity from inappropriate use and development, and ensure ecosystems and indigenous biodiversity on public and private land are protected and restored

Auckland Council Biodiversity Directs Council to: Strategy Conserve the greatest number and most diverse range of Auckland s ecosystems and sequences (Objective 1); Improve implementation of Council statutory responsibilities to support our biodiversity mandate (Objective 8).

Five criteria: Significance Criteria Representativeness Uniqueness Threat status and rarity Stepping stones, buffers and migration pathways Gradients and diversity

Representativeness Is an example of an indigenous ecosystem (including both mature and successional stages) that contributes to the protection of at least 10% of the original extent of each ecosystem type in Auckland (starting with the largest areas).

Uniqueness Unique elements of Auckland natural heritage including species and ecosystems endemic to Auckland, species at their distributional limits, largest and most significant populations of species in the region or New Zealand.

Threat status and rarity Threatened and naturally rare species or ecosystems

Stepping stones, buffers and migration pathways Indigenous ecosystems used by any native species permanently or intermittently for an essential part of their life cycle Indigenous vegetation immediately adjacent to indigenous biodiversity in an existing protected natural area or site supporting threatened or unique species or ecosystems

Gradients and diversity Indigenous vegetation that extends across environmental gradients resulting in a sequence of vegetation or habitats e.g., an indigenous estuary to an indigenous freshwater wetland. Supports the expected ecosystem diversity or species richness for the habitat(s)

SEA Process (1) Potential new sites identified through a gap analysis exercise with information derived from surveys and/or existing information Existing SEAs and potential new sites assessed against criteria Some criteria applied automatically e.g. databases/maps of threatened species Some manually applied by ecologists

SEA Process (2) Draft SEA overlay - sites that meet one or more of the criteria plus those sites where information inadequate subject to further investigation Letters sent to all ~6000 landowners Currently responding to landowner queries Correcting mapping errors and where possible assessing subject to further investigation sites

SEAs Biodiversity Rules Vegetation Management (4.2.3.17) Riparian margins 10-40m wide (generally not mapped as overlays) Landscape, natural features, natural character overlays Coastal overlays (operative legacy generally urban) Urban Tree protection (operative legacy) Rural conservation zone Slopes > 15 0 in countryside living, rural production, rural coastal and mixed rural zones

SEA Vegetation Provisions Permitted for minor or appropriate works: Trimming; Emergency works; Ecological restoration; Maintenance around existing buildings, cleared areas and tracks Controlled activity for first house if no suitable site outside of SEA Discretionary all other clearance

Transferable Development Rights (Bonus Subdivision) Reduces the min lot size for the recipient site in exchange for SEA legal protection/management Recipient site must be in specified parts of Countryside Living Zone SEAs must be >5ha, or >3ha if site is identified under threat status and rarity criterion, or > 0.5ha for wetlands One only per property and all of SEA must be included

Other SEA Unitary Plan provisions Development One dwelling per site where no practical alternative location on the site outside the SEA All other buildings and/or accessory buildings New production forestry Impervious surfaces Land disturbing activities Activity Status Controlled Discretionary Non-complying Discretionary Various

Key changes from legacy plans to Unitary Plan (SEAs) Standardisation of SEA significance criteria Coastal protection areas (CPAs) superseded by Marine SEAs (and Outstanding Natural Features) Increase in extent of terrestrial SEAs legacy SEAs = 50,150ha Max. extent* of Unitary Plan SEAs = 84,195ha 67% increase in the extent over AK

SEAs: Key Changes in Rules Vegetation Management Controlled activity for first house if no practical alternative location building platform Permitted to keep area around house clear (up to 20m 2 ) All other clearance discretionary (previously NC in most instances beyond a standard) Reduction in rural vegetation clearance controls outside of SEAs

Key Changes in Rules SEA TDR (bonus) subdivision rules tighter Restricted number of sites eligible as donors and recipient Bonus subdivision mainly limited to existing SEAs i.e. not enhancement provisions (some in Franklin) Biodiversity offsetting provided for

Implications of RMA Changes (Enacted and in RM Reform Bill) Most general urban tree protection gone with Simplifying and Streamlining Act RM Reform Bill would further restrict protection of urban vegetation to only notable trees/groups of trees Urban SEAs incl ~930ha of vegetation in Tgn; urban tree overlays urban coastal overlays, urban riparian margins

Implications of RMA Changes (RMA discussion document) Signals 6(c) areas must be specified this accords with Unitary Plan SEA approach, but could be problematic Also seems to introduce mandate for biodiversity offsetting (nb DOC still working on guidance for these)

Summary SEAs key terrestrial biodiversity provision Consistent identification of SEAs across Auckland Changes in extent and nature of biodiversity provisions from legacy plans RMA reform hampers protection of urban biodiversity