Yield and yield component response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) genotypes to different sowing dates in Gird region of Madhya Pradesh

Similar documents
BULLOCK CART LOADED SPV WATER PUMPING SYSTEM FOR SMALL FARMERS

Nitrogen uptake in cotton+greengram intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management

Impact of dry seeding with alternate wetting and drying on rice productivity and profitability in Punjab-Pakistan

BCR for Seed and Fibre Production with Seed and Cutting Treatments at Different Sowing Methods at JAES and KRS, BJRI in O-9897 Variety

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Phosphorus use efficiency, grain yield, and quality of triticale and durum wheat under irrigated conditions

Alternate wetting and drying irrigation for rice cultivation

MICRO IRRIGATION A technology to save water

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

Current capabilities in the analysis of climate risks and adaptation strategies in critical areas

COMBINING ABILITY IN LOCAL AND CIMMYT INBRED LINES OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) FOR GRAIN YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS USING LINE TESTER ANALYSIS

EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND NPK FERTILIZER RATE ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF QUALITY PROTEIN MAIZE (Zea mays L.)

Amanullah, Muhammad Jaffar Hassan, Khalid Nawab and Asad Ali. Department of Agronomy, NWFP Agric. Univ. Peshawar 2

Effect of Site Specific Drip Fertigation on Yield of Chilli

Sustainability and Trends in Profitability of Indian Agriculture

SCREENING OF SIX RICE VARIETIES AGAINST YELLOW STEM BORER, Scirpophaga incertulus WALKER. SAID MIR KHAN*, GHULAM MURTAZA* and HINA MIR**

Impact of Water Saving Irrigation Systems on Water Use, Growth and Yield of Irrigated Lowland Rice

The Potash Development Association Potash for Cereals

GROWTH DYNAMICS AND YIELD OF WINTER WHEAT VARIETIES GROWN AT DIVERSE NITROGEN LEVELS E. SUGÁR and Z. BERZSENYI

Deficit Rainfall Insurance Payouts in Most Vulnerable Agro Climatic Zones of Tamil Nadu, India

Hemp as organic protein source for pigs and poultry. Focus on Industrial Hemp. November 4, 2010

TEZA DE DOCTORAT Mariana POPA SUMMARY

Southern Agricultural Research Institute, Crop Science Research Work Process, Jinka Agricultural Research Center, Jinka, Ethiopia

Hybrid Rye for Biogas Trial Results 2012/13 KWS UK

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

Maize is a major cereal grown and consumed in Uganda and in the countries of Kenya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

Effect of new generation herbicides on weed parameters and seed yield of rice fallow black gram, Vigna mungo L

Organic Gardening Certificate Program Quiz Week 3 Answer Key

2014 Flax Weed Control Trial

primefacts Yield and digestibility of legume and oat forages Dr Brian Dear Principal Research Scientist

How To Manage Alfalfa

Effect of radiomimetic agents on two varieties of Trigonella with emphasis on plant height and pod numbers

Vernonia oilseed production in the mid-atlantic region of the United States

Substitution of soil application of urea with foliar application to minimize the wheat yield losses

RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES UNDER THREE PLANT DENSITIES IN NEWLY RECLAIMED SOIL INTRODUCTION

The Impact of Climate Variability and Change on Crop Production

Drip Fertigation in Horticultural crops

Ear properties of direct seeded sweet corn

3.3 Real Returns Above Variable Costs

AUTOMATED SOIL WATER TENSION-BASED DRIP IRRIGATION FOR PRECISE IRRIGATION SCHEDULING

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT BASMATI RICE VARIETIES TO STEM BORERS UNDER DIFFERENT CONTROL TACTICS OF IPM AND EVALUATION OF YIELD

EGYPTIAN COTTON PRODUCTION TO MEET THE EXTRA LONG STAPLE COTTON REQUIREMENT IN THE COUNTRY. K.N. Gururajan

EFFECTS OF VARYING IRRIGATION AND MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE APPLICATION ON COTTON HEIGHT, UNIFORMITY, YIELD, AND QUALITY. Abstract

COTTON WATER RELATIONS

Genotype X seed production environment interaction on the performance of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) under irrigation

Sequential cropping of Vertisols in the Ethiopian highlands using a broadbed-and-furrow system

Using Technology and Big Data to Improve Profits. Matt Darr, Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

Agro-Met Advisories- Helping Farmers Stay Ahead in the Weather Game : Experiences from the Field

IMPORTANCE OF LONG-TERM EXPERIMENTS IN STUDYING THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE. Introduction

Efficacy of different management practices against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Kharif maize in Western Uttar Pradesh

Doctoral Theses. Ferenc Orosz. Supervisor: Dr. Katalin Angéla Slezák Assistant Professor

EFFECT OF CONTAINERS ON SEED QUALITY OF STORAGE SOYBEAN SEED

Humidtropics Kiboga/Kyankwanzi Soybean production training

The Relationship Between Grain Yield and Silage Yield in Field Corn in Northern Illinois INTRODUCTION

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Precision Farming in Practice

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

EXPERIENCES ON TRANSFER OF MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ASCOCHYTA BLIGHT OF CHICKPEA IN TURKEY. Nevin AÇIKGÖZ

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

SOURCES OF FARM POWER

Farmers Cultural Practices. Availability of Planting Material

Harvesting energy with fertilizers

MS DATA ANALYSIS EXAM INSTRUCTIONS

Culture in field conditions - Challenges A South American point of view Roberto Campos Pura Natura, Argentina

Heat Stress Tolerant Maize for Asia (HTMA)

RICE CULTIVATION: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND WATER SAVING APPROACHES

Index Insurance in India

Agriculture Insurance Company of India Limited (AIC)

ARGENTINE NON GMO SOYBEAN CHAIN

Management JBiopest 5(1): of 1-6 rice yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Walker using some biorational insecticides

BREEDING AND GENETICS

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

Cotton Situation in the World 1 M. Rafiq Chaudhry Technical Information Section

COMPOST AND PLANT GROWTH EXPERIMENTS

FACT SHEET. Production Risk

Table 3. List of descritors for maize

Different Corm Sizes Affect Performance of Gladiolus grandiflorus cvs. Red Majesty and Early Yellow

The Watergy greenhouse: Improved productivity and water use efficiency using a closed greenhouse

suscon Green One application. 3 years control against grass grub. Grass grub damaged pasture

our Commitment to Sustainable Agriculture Practices

CROP INSURANCE IN INDIA - A BRIEF REVIEW

Cost Benefit Analysis and Marketing of Mushroom in Haryana

CHAPTER 5 FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN INDIAN AGRICULTURE

Introduction: Growth analysis and crop dry matter accumulation

Horticulture Information Leaflet 33-E

Changing Energy-use Pattern and the Demand Projection for Indian Agriculture

Plant Physiology Critical Stages in the Life of a Corn Plant

Grow your own wheat. preparation #1. Brockwell Bake TEACHER S NOTES. Sowing times. Choosing and obtaining seed wheat. Sowing site.

IDŐJÁRÁS Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service Vol. 116, No. 3, July September 2012, pp

An analysis of production and marketing of coconut in Tumkur District, India

Evaluating the benefits of integrated rice-duck farming as organic system in Bangladesh

Moringa for Cattle Fodder and Plant Growth

Maternal & Child Mortality and Total Fertility Rates. Sample Registration System (SRS) Office of Registrar General, India 7th July 2011

Heavy Metals in Cocoa

Incorporating rice straw into soil may become disposal option for growers

Forecasting areas and production of rice in India using ARIMA model

Corporate stewardship Partnering to Improve Agricultural practices. Mumbai Randhir Chauhan

WILD OAT CONTROL AND TOLERANCE OF GRASS SEED CROPS TO FENOXAPROP-P-ETHYL. M.P. ROLSTON and W. ARCHIE

Transcription:

International Journal of Farm Sciences 4(2): 1-6, 2014 Yield and yield component response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) genotypes to different sowing dates in Gird region of Madhya Pradesh SPS TOMAR, SUDEEP S TOMAR and SC SRIVASTAVA Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior 474002 MP Email for correspondence: sharad_eco@rediffmail.com ABSTRACT The effects of various sowing dates on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) were studied. The experiment was conducted at agricultural research farm of College of Agriculture, Gwalior, MP during the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. The experiment comprised of four wheat genotypes (HI 8498, HI 1544, GW 322 and Lok 1) and four sowing dates. The pooled data revealed that crop sown on 14 November showed promising results in terms of grain yield (47.33 q/ha), plant height, number of ear heads per m 2, length of ear head, number of grains per ear head, weight of ear head, test weight and straw yield followed by sowing dates of 21, 28 November and 8 December. The early sowing (14 November) gave 12.80 per cent higher grain yield in comparison to that of 21 November date of sowing. The delayed sowing (8 December) reduced the grain yield (38.19 q/ha) which was 19.30 per cent lower than that of 14 November date of sowing. All the varieties sown on 14 November registered more total income, net income and B:C ratio than the crop sown on 21 November. Key words: Wheat (Triticum aestivum); genotypes; sowing time; yield; returns INTRODUCTION Wheat is the most important food grain crop in India occupying approximately 230 million ha world over. Today India is the second largest producer of wheat with an area of 28.46 million hectare with an annual production of 80.80 million tons and the average productivity of 2,839 kg/ha (Anon 2011) which is very low as compared to yield potentials of the approved varieties in the country. Among the various factors responsible for low yield of wheat crop in the country varietal selection and sowing time are of primary importance. Its cultivation in India has been dominated by the northern region of India. The northern states of Punjab and Haryana plains in India have been prolific wheat producers. While in northern states it is grown as irrigated crop in parts of Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra it is grown largely under rainfed conditions with little or no irrigation support. Wheat is sown in winter

Tomar et al and it has its own definite requirements for temperature and light for germination, growth and flowering (Dabre et al 1993). The delayed sown wheat is drastically affected not only in terms of germination but also crop growth behavior, leaf area development, number of tillers, number of grains per spike, 1,000 grain weight and test weight and eventually the grain yield. The high temperature at grain filling stage may be one of the yield reducing abiotic stresses in declining yield. High temperature in the post-entheses period of late sown wheat shortens the grain filling period resulting in a smaller endosperm, lower grain weight and increased protein content. High temperature and desiccating winds during the month of April may cause forced maturity of late sown wheat thus resulting in reduction of test weight (Singh and Dhaliwal 2000). Many high yielding varieties have been evolved and recommended for general cultivation in the past. These varieties are losing their yield potential due to change of various edaphic and environmental conditions. Therefore continuous selection of high yielding genotypes with mid range of adaptability to edaphic and environmental conditions is very essential to increase yield per hectare. Keeping this in view the present study was designed to determinate the effect of different sowing dates on growth and yield of wheat varieties in Gird region of Madhya Pradesh. MATERIAL and METHODS The experiment was conducted at agricultural research farm of College of Agriculture, Gwalior, MP during the year 2009-10 and 2010-11 in Rabi season. The soil of the experimental site was sandy clay loam in texture with ph 8.15 and electrical conductivity of 0.2 (ds/m). The experiment comprised of four wheat varieties (HI 8498, HI 1544, GW 322 and Lok 1) and four sowing dates viz 14, 21, 28 November and 8 December and was laid out in split plot design having three replications and a net plot size 1.4m x 7.0 m. A common fertilizer dose of 120, 60 and 40 kg of N, P and K respectively was applied during both the years. Full P and K and half N were applied as basal doses and remaining N was applied in two equal parts as top dressing at milk first immigration and second immigration stages. The crop was sown with single row hard drill on a well prepared seed bed using a seed rate of 120 kg/ha. All other agronomic practices were kept normal and uniform for all the treatments. The observations recorded included plant height (cm), number of tillers/culm, number of ear heads/m 2, length of ear head (cm), number of grains/ear head, weight of ear head (gm), test weight (g), grain yield q/ha and straw yield q/ha. The data collected were analyzed statistically separately as per the procedure given by Panse and Sukhatme (1967). 2

Sowing dates effect on wheat yield RESULTS and DISCUSSION Effect of sowing dates Sowing dates significantly affected the yield and yield components (Table 1). Wheat crop sown on 14 November recorded significantly higher yield and yield attributes over rest of the sowing dates. Planting of wheat crop on 14 November showed promising results in terms of grain yield (47.33 q/ha), plant height (94.15 cm), number of ear heads per m 2 (85.88), length of ear head (11.11 cm), number of grains per ear head (48.62), weight of ear head (8.04 g), test weight (38.34 g) and straw yield (64.33 q/ha) followed by sowing date of 21, 28 November and 8 December. It shows that early sowing (14 November) gave 12.80 per cent higher grain yield in comparison to that of 21 November date of sowing. The delayed sowing (8 December) reduced the grain yield (38.19 q/ha) which was 19.30 per cent lower than that of 14 November date of sowing. The lower yield in late sown wheat may be attributed to the reduction in number of grains per ear head and test weight. These results are in line with those of Rashid et al (2004), Qamar et al (2004), Subhan et al (2004), Kumar and Sharma (2003) and Singh and Dhaliwal (2000). Effect of varieties Significant variation in yield attributes, grain and straw yield were observed due to varietal differences (Table 1). Out of four verities HI 1544 gave the maximum and Lok 1 gave the lowest grain yield. The higher grain yield in HI 1544 was attained due to more number of tillers/ m 2, ear heads/m 2, number of grains/ear head and higher test weight as compared to HI 8498, GW 322 and Lok 1. More number of tillers, ear heads, grains/ear head and higher test weight might have contributed to higher leaf area which could be responsible for more photosynthesis. Monetary returns from treatments The data given in Table 2 reveal that all the varieties sown on 14 November (D 1 ) registered higher total income, net income and B:C ratio than the crop sown on 21 November (D 2 ). The treatment combination D 1 V 2 gave highest net income ( 55,847.00 per ha) and B:C ratio (3.80) followed by D 1 V 1 ( 54,877.50 per ha and 3.61) and D 1 V 3 ( 52,972.50 kg/ha and 3.61). The treatment combination D 4 V 4 gave lowest net income and B:C ratio ( 45,566.50 kg/ ha and 3.10). REFERENCES Anonymous 2011. Agricultural statistics at a glance, 2011. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi. Dabre WM, Lall SB and Lngole GL 1993. Effects of sowing dates on yield, ear number, stomatal frequency and stomatal index in wheat. Journal of Maharastra Agricultural University 18: 64-66. Kumar R and Sharma SN 2003. Effect of levels of nitrogen on wheat as influenced by date of 3

Tomar et al Table 1. Effect of varieties and dates of sowing on yield, yield attributes and protein content of wheat Treatment Plant Number Number of Length of Number Weight of Test Grain Straw height of tillers/ ear heads/ ear head of grains/ ear head weight yield yield (cm) culm m 2 (cm) ear head (g) (g) (q/ha) (q/ha) Date of sowing 14 Nov (D1) 94.15 9.95 85.88 11.11 48.62 8.04 38.34 47.33 64.33 21 Nov (D2) 93.37 9.82 84.36 11.03 48.23 7.89 33.46 41.97 60.27 28 Nov (D3) 86.63 8.76 82.13 10.01 36.70 7.45 32.86 40.07 58.10 8 Dec (D4) 85.93 8.83 81.13 9.94 34.66 7.14 30.83 38.19 52.92 CD 0.05 4.17 1.40 1.77 0.46 1.43 0.66 3.80 4.15 5.25 Variety HI 8498 (V1) 89.94 9.49 82.96 10.65 43.86 7.68 37.07 42.98 58.65 HI 1544 (V2) 91.78 9.91 85.39 11.05 39.87 7.77 33.17 44.91 57.18 GW 322 (V3) 90.80 9.25 84.37 10.61 43.47 6.99 31.74 39.49 60.21 LOK 1 (V4) 89.95 9.68 83.48 10.59 39.22 7.26 35.04 39.37 56.81 CD 0.05 4.56 1.59 1.60 0.77 1.14 1.04 3.97 4.31 2.53 4

Sowing dates effect on wheat yield Table 2. Monetary returns from wheat using different dates of sowing and varieties Treatment Total cost of Grain yield Straw yield Value Gross Net income B:C cultivation (q/ha) (q/ha) Grain Straw income ( /ha) ratio ( ) ( ) ( /ha) D1V1 14,687 45.16 61.49 54,192.00 15,372.50 69,564.50 54,877.50 3.74 D1V2 14,687 46.12 60.76 55,344.00 15,190.00 70,534.00 55,847.00 3.80 D1V3 14,687 43.41 62.27 52,092.00 15,567.50 67,659.50 52,972.50 3.61 D1V4 14,687 42.35 60.57 50,820.00 15,142.50 65,962.50 51,275.50 3.49 D2V1 14,687 42.48 59.46 50,976.00 14,865.00 65,841.00 51,154.00 3.48 D2V2 14,687 43.44 58.73 52,128.00 14,682.50 66,810.50 52,123.50 3.55 D2V3 14,687 40.73 60.24 48,876.00 15,060.00 63,936.00 49,249.00 3.35 D2V4 14,687 40.67 58.54 48,804.00 14,635.00 63,439.00 48,752.00 3.32 D3V1 14,687 41.53 58.38 49,836.00 14,595.00 64,431.00 49,744.00 3.39 D3V2 14,687 42.49 57.64 50,988.00 14,410.00 65,398.00 50,711.00 3.45 D3V3 14,687 39.78 59.16 47,736.00 14,790.00 62,526.00 47,839.00 3.26 D3V4 14,687 39.77 57.46 47,724.00 14,365.00 62,089.00 47,402.00 3.23 D4V1 14,687 40.59 55.79 48,708.00 13,947.50 62,655.50 47,968.50 3.27 D4V2 14,687 41.55 55.05 49,860.00 13,762.50 63,622.50 48,935.50 3.33 D4V3 14,687 38.84 56.57 46,608.00 14,142.50 60,750.50 46,063.50 3.14 D4V4 14,687 38.78 54.87 46,536.00 13,717.50 60,253.50 45,566.50 3.10 Note: Grain price @ 1,200 /q and straw price @ 250 /q 5

Tomar et al sowing. Annals of Agricultural Research 24: 104-110 Panse VG and Sukhatme PV 1967. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 2 nd ed, xvi, 381p. Qamar M, Shafiullah and Makeen S 2004. Genetic variability among wheat cultivars and effect of planting dates on grain and straw yield under double cropping zone of Northern areas of Pakistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 20: 99-102. Rashid MH, Samanta SC, Biswas P, Mannan MA and Zaman AKMM 2004. Performance of thirty wheat genotypes under late sown conditions in southern region of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Plant Science 3: 286-289. Singh T and Dhaliwal GS 2000. Performance of wheat varieties under late sowing conditions in southwestern region of Punjab. PAU Journal of Research 37: 181-183. Subhan F, Khan M and Jamro GH 2004. Effect of different planting dates, seeding rate and weed control method on grain yield and yield components in wheat. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 20: 51-55. Received: 11.01.14 Accepted: 17.02.14 6