Outline. NAIC Risk Based Capital Model. Goals Formula Risk Categories RBC Level of Action C-3 Phase II



Similar documents
Regulatory Capital Requirements for U.S. Life Insurers

Comparison of the NAIC Life, P&C and Health RBC Formulas

Rating Methodology for Domestic Life Insurance Companies

Clarification of C-3 (Interest Rate Risk) RBC Instructions

PNB Life Insurance Inc. Risk Management Framework

New York Life Global Funding $11,000,000,000 GLOBAL DEBT ISSUANCE PROGRAM

Solutions to Past CAS Questions Associated with NAIC Property/Casualty Insurance Company Risk Based Capital Requirements Feldblum, S.

Allstate Life Insurance Group Combined Management Discussion and Analysis For the Year Ended December 31, 2007

Life Insurer Financial Profile

Risk-Based Capital. Overview

STATUTORY CALENDAR YEAR INTEREST RATES BASED ON THE 1980 AMENDMENTS TO THE NAIC STANDARD VALUATION AND NONFORFEITURE LAWS. Valuation Interest Rate

Rating Methodology Life / Health Insurance

MUTUAL OF OMAHA Investor Presentation July 2014

Spring 2003 Notes for SoA Course 6 exam, Copyright 2003 by Krzysztof Ostaszewski

Proposed Insurance Act Amendments Life Insurance

New York Life Global Funding $7,000,000,000 GLOBAL DEBT ISSUANCE PROGRAM

Valuation Report on Prudential Annuities Limited as at 31 December The investigation relates to 31 December 2003.

Pricing exercise based on a collection of actuarial assumptions Assumptions generally divided into two sets

Protective Reports First Quarter of 2011 Results and Announces Completion of Coinsurance Agreement

Selecting an Annuity Provider

MetLife Investments Steve Kandarian Chief Investment Officer

Proposed Transfer of the Life Insurance Business of BT Life Limited to Westpac Life Insurance Services Limited

INDUSTRIAL-ALLIANCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. FIRST QUARTER 2000 Consolidated Financial Statements (Non audited)

Variable Annuities Recent Trends and the Use of Captives

VALUATION ACTUARIES AHD PROPERTY-CASUALTY IHSURAHCE. By Susan E. Witcraft

PRICOA Global Funding I. $15,000,000,000 Global Medium Term Note Program

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING PROPOSED REHABILITATION AND CONVERSION FOR SHENANDOAH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY June 27, 2011

KENTUCKY EMPLOYERS' MUTUAL INSURANCE AUTHORITY dba KENTUCKY EMPLOYERS' MUTUAL INSURANCE

NEDGROUP LIFE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED. A member of the Nedbank group

A Shortcut to Calculating Return on Required Equity and It s Link to Cost of Capital

The Empire Life Insurance Company

Capital Adequacy Calculation Workbook Level 1 general insurers

Life and A&H Industry at a Glance

State of the Industry

Comparison of the NAIC Life, P&C and Health RBC Formulas

Retirement Income Investment Strategy by Andrew J. Krosnowski

financial strength benchmarking of life insurance competitors

M INTELLIGENCE. Dividend Interest Rates for Dividend Interest Rate. July Life insurance due. care requires an

Practice Education Course Individual Life and Annuities Exam June 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Life Insurance Corporation (Singapore)Pte Ltd UEN E MANAGEMENT REPORT 31/12/2013

Actuarial Guideline: XLIII Statutory and Tax Issues

INSURANCE RATING METHODOLOGY

Unbundling Insurance Contracts

PRICOA Global Funding I. $15,000,000,000 Global Medium Term Note Program

Stable Value Market to 2013

Jackson National Life Global Funding U.S. $9,000,000,000

Fixed Deferred Annuities

Benchmarking Key Financial Ratios

!! "#$% &'&& "(%)*"+!,! - $./ -0/ 1#$02$.3#4*5 6.#.5"070(.5$.% 6 $7#.91#$02 99:&: ""$7*0$**,99:&: -..#$"+??@/ - 0.%4$.#. $.%#$;0 /

International Financial Reporting for Insurers: IFRS and U.S. GAAP September 2009 Session 25: Solvency II vs. IFRS

The package of measures to avoid artificial volatility and pro-cyclicality

CALCULATION OF THE AMOUNTS OF AN INSURANCE COMPANY S CAPITAL, FOUNDATION FUNDS, RESERVES, ETC., FOR RISKS EXCEEDING NORMAL EXPECTATIONS

Leveraged Loan Funds: Debunking the Myths

Rating Methodology by Sector. Life Insurance

Understanding Fixed Indexed Annuities

Assessing Sources of Funding for Insurance Risk Based Capital

Forward Looking Statements 2. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Regulatory Solvency Assessment of Property/Casualty Insurance Companies in the United States

John Gagnon GW Financial/M Benefit Solutions Bank Strategies

Guaranteed Interest Account

MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE MODEL ACT

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CORPORATION (A wholly owned subsidiary of New York Life Insurance Company)

Bond Valuation. Chapter 7. Example (coupon rate = r d ) Bonds, Bond Valuation, and Interest Rates. Valuing the cash flows

Generate More Efficient Income and a Stronger Portfolio

Forward Looking Statements 2. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Financialfacts. Great-West Life participating life insurance. Accountability Strength Performance

MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNDERSTANDING PARTICIPATING WHOLE LIFE INSURANCE

Claims Paying Ability Ratings for General Insurance Companies

ASSET VALUATION RESERVE. Enter amounts from Line 16 of the prior year s Reserve Calculation.

Transcription:

Capital Management

Outline NAIC Risk Based Capital Model Goals Formula Risk Categories RBC Level of Action C-3 Phase II

Outline S&P Capital Model Description Formula S&P Rating Level Risk Categories Conclusion

NAIC Risk Based Capital - Measures minimum amount of capital required to support overall business operations. - Considers the size and the degree of risk taken by the insurer.

Goals of NAIC RBC Requirement Universally recognized capital standard. Protection against short term adverse deviations. Prevents companies from taking extraordinary risk.

Goals of NAIC RBC Requirement Assures interested parties that the risk of insolvency is low. Authorize regulators to enforce compliance with more capital requirements.

RBC Formula Estimate RBC levels required to manage losses that can be caused by a series of catastrophic financial events. Probability of all losses to occur simultaneously is very low. Covariance adjustment combined effect not equal to the sum.

RBC Formula Company Action Level RBC = C-0 + C-4a + [(C-1o + C-3a)^2 + (C-1cs)^2 + (C-2)^2 + (C-3)^2 + (C-4b)^2) ^0.5] RBC is compared to TAC.

Total Adjusted Capital (TAC) TAC = Capital and Surplus + AVR + 50% of dividend liability AVR is included even though it shows as a liability on the balance sheet. AVR absorbs capital gains and losses, whereas in determining the C-1 risk factors it is ignored.

Types of Risk - C-0 - Asset Risk Affiliate C-1 - Asset Risk Other C-2 - Insurance / Pricing Risk C-3 - Interest Rate Risk C-4 - Business Risk

C-0 Affiliate Asset Risk Measures default risk of affiliates.

Asset Risk Other (C-1o, C-1cs) Default of principal or interest. Fluctuation in MV. Risk factors are adjusted for the portfolio size and concentration risk factor.

Insurance Risk (C-2) Capital needed to cover excess claims over expected. Excess claims could be due to random fluctuations or inaccurate pricing for future claims.

Insurance Risk (C-2) Factors are applied to NAR. NAR broken down by size. Factors reflect the decrease in risk for larger blocks of business.

Interest Rate Risk (C-3a, C-3b) Risk of loss due to changes in interest rate level. Covers mismatch b/w liability and asset cash flows.

Interest Rate Risk (C-3a, C-3b) Impact of interest rate is greater where guarantees are in favor of the policyholder. Risk categories vary by withdrawal characteristics.

C-3 Phase I Cash Flow Testing Exemption worksheet. C-3 Significance Test and Stress Test. Performed on Annuities and Single Premium Life.

C-3 Phase I Mostly annuity companies get picked for scenario testing. Floor of 50% and cap of 200%. Well matched companies usually fall below the 50% floor, hence C-3 factors are reduced by 50%.

Business Risk (C-4a, C-4b) General business risk. Factors cover Procedural, Personnel, External and Disaster risk. Charge assessed against premiums or annuity considerations subject to guaranty fund assessment.

Business Risk (C-4a, C-4b) No charge for Separate Account business premium. There is a charge on the separate account liability.

RBC Level of Action Ratio b/w TAC and RBC determines the level of action by the regulators. Different levels of action None. Company Action Level submit RBC plan Regulatory Action Level corrective actions Authorized Control Level regulatory actions Mandatory Control Level regulatory control

RBC C-3 Phase II Planned to go in effect on 12-31-2004. Many companies are suggesting that it be delayed. The scope of this regulation includes VA and Group VA w/ GMDB and GLB.

Why S&P? Companies rated by S&P. S&P more conservative than RBC.

S&P Capital Adequacy Model Determines the amount of capital that S&P expects the company to hold as a safety cushion. The model produces Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR).

S&P Capital Adequacy Model CAR compares adjusted capital to a base level of surplus appropriate to support liabilities. CAR is only a starting point.

S&P Capital Adequacy Model S&P Analyst plays a critical role in adjusting the model to assess company specific risks. Besides CAR, the company s mgmt, corporate strategy, liquidity etc. are also considered. At the same time analyst maintains a standard of comparability among companies.

Capital Adequacy Ratio CAR = Total Adjusted Capital (TAC) - C-1 (asset related risk) C-2 (pricing risk) + C-3 (int rate risk) + C-4 (oper risk)

S&P Rating Level CAR Rating Assessment < 100% BB or lower Various 100% - 125% BBB Good 125% - 150% A Strong 150% -175% AA Very Strong More than 175% AAA Extremely Strong

Total Adjusted Capital TAC = Statutory Capital and Surplus + AVR + 50% of the policyholder dividend liability

Asset Default risk (C-1) S&P Bond Charge S&P Preferred Stock Charge NAIC RBC Bond Charge* NAIC RBC Preferred Stock Charge* Class 1.0051.0084.0029.0081 Class 2.0391.0652.0095.0221 Class 3.0936.1504.0339.0531 Class 4.1740.2744.0737.1106 Class 5.2756.4036.1696.1844 Class 6.3.6.1950.1950 * After tax factors.

Asset Default risk (C-1) Concentration Risk Charge additional charge assets w/ credit risk associated with single issuer are aggregated to assess concentration risk. Size factor

Liability Pricing Risk (C-2) Approach similar to RBC. Factors for Life Insurance are applied to NAR. C-2 factors are more conservative for S&P than RBC.

Interest Rate Risk (C-3) Risk categories are similar to RBC low to high. Some products are classified differently.

Interest Rate Risk (C-3) Low Risk Life Insurance Reserves Synthetic GICs Medium Risk - Annuity Reserves not withdrawable (xcl. SPIAs) considered low risk under RBC. - Annuity Reserves with surrender charge.

Interest Rate Risk (C-3) - Structured Settlements - GICs considered low risk under RBC. - Annuity Reserves with MVA considered low risk under RBC. High Risk - Annuity Reserves with no adjustments - SPIAs (incl. Pension Buyouts) considered low risk for RBC.

General Business Risk (C-4) Approximated by applying factors to Premiums subject to Guaranty Assessment Fund.

To conclude... - S&P factors are more conservative especially for an annuity company. - Based on Statutory Accounting, same as NAIC RBC. - S&P excludes Goodwill.

To conclude... - C3 CFT test in NAIC RBC. S&P recognizes the significant research and is monitoring the effects. - RBC Factors after tax - No covariance adjustment in the S&P formula.