Effektiv hantering av Data och Information i M3 Joakim Jannerfeldt Anders Cottman

Information Data Information

År 2015 kommer 15% av alla organisationer att ha moderniserat sina strategier för informationshantering och på så sätt ökat sina ekonomiska fördelar med 20% jämfört med de som inte gör det. Gartner 2013

Information Management Omvandla data till information för att få kunskap och insikt Data Integration Before After Data Quality Management GOVERN D A C B Master Data Management Enterprise Modeling Document Management Information Lifecycle Management

Hur Ni kan knyta ostrukturerad information (dokument) till data i M3 2 Analys / simulering / arkivering av data i M3

Effective document management Employees use 20-40% of their time for manual information search 1 The implementation of ECM system saves on average 41.2% disk space 2 59% of middlemanagers miss almost every day information that they know exists but cannot be found The ROI of ECM systems is 612% on average 4 Employees send on average 2+ documents for approval to five persons every day 5 1) Coopers and Lybrand 2) AIIM 2012 Capitalizing on Content 3) Accenture 4) Nucleus Research, 2 5) Harmon.ie, 2011

Kontroll Compliance Säkerhet Mobilitet Transparens Tillgänglighet

Vi erbjuder METADATA-DRIVEN (WHAT VS. WHERE) FLEXIBLE DEPLOYMENT: CLOUD, ON-PREMISE, HYBRID SIMPLE, YET HIGHLY CONFIGURABLE ECM INSTANTLY FAMILIAR (INTEGRATED IN TO WINDOWS) INTEGRATED WITH M3 AND OTHER SOFTWARES ACCESSIBILITY ON EVERY DEVICE Dokumenthantering integrerat i M3

Archiving Project model Environment Investigation Delivery Edu/ Prod run 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Database Analysis Meeting System, Prel Arc policy System measures DB-quality corrections Meeting Quality, Arc policy Document, Schedule Program Test/ Education Prod-run, Support Standard model in all projects, used hundreds of times Complete delivery; Pgm-improvements, documentation, support

Step_1 Database analysis 1 Database Analysis Complete analyse of all PRD-databases (MVX/MDK/CUS etc.) All routines you need to get suggestions (even if they are not in M3 std) Overall inspection.. Not only suggestions on archiving, but all proposals, that affects the environment for the better, is reported In the analysis it has been discovered that there may be great need to clean-up obsolete / old master data (MDM) - Routines covering items, customers, suppliers, Users, etc are available

Step_1 Database analysis Example 1 Database Analysis

Step_1 Database analysis other findings 1 Database Analysis Great need for analyzes / archiving of master data (37% of all items are in status 90 etc) We believe there are many Users which are not used in the M3. How to analyze? One loop generated > 50 million extra records in MWOPHA? 18 GB in OTRSMS, but the customer does not use MSMS? / See MNS100 and CRS739 The TST environment is almost as big as PRD, but > 3 year old and out of date? We have (we think) a lot of User s that is not active - can you help us? For complete transaction archiving you need 36 routines Only half of all purchase orders can be archived (Because status is '00 ', '06' & '75 ') Totaly 17 CUS tables where of 9 of TF nature and are mapped as in report ETC, ETC, ETC.......

Master Data - MDM: Analysis / simulation & possibly archiving Routines Item & Product structures Item / facility Item / wharehouse Customers Supplier Price-list (Customer & Service) Purchase prices; contracts and agreements Users : 1) Select / Search / Replace: Deletion not possible if User is linked to scheduled job including safety management in M3 2) Mass-analyzis all User When you run and get the result in sub-file you will get good info such as; table that prevent you from archive, best work-with-pgm and via right-click: jump to that program

Masterdata Item: Simulation - Step 1

Masterdata Item: Simulation - Step 4 MWS070

Masterdata Item: Result after filing of 2 items logged in TAM:

Masterdata Item: Simulation export to excel

FINAL RESULT 1 2

Tack! Välkomna till vår monter Joakim Jannerfeldt Anders Cottman