SALARY ENHANCEMENT FOR CONTINUED ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. Preface

Similar documents
Faculty Handbook

5. SALARY POLICIES 5.1. SALARY POLICY AND GOALS 5.2. SALARY PROCEDURES 5.3. ROLE OF THE COLLEGE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE IN COMPENSATION

Florida Gulf Coast University Sabbatical Guidelines Approved November 18, 2011

Tenure Consideration. Department of Foreign Language Studies Criteria and Procedures for Tenure and Promotion

Department of Applied Arts and Sciences. University of Montana- Missoula College of Technology

SABBATICAL LEAVE CALENDAR 1

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE Staff Salary Administration

UMDNJ OFFICE OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS FACULTY AND LIBRARIAN OUT-OF-CYCLE SALARY INCREASES

Engineering Technology Department Bylaws 2011

APPOINTMENT TO AND PROMOTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF

Encouraging, Documenting and Recognizing Excellence in Academic Leadership

Chapter VIII Resignation, Retirement and Salary Continuation Plan

DRAFT 1/4/12 Faculty Workload

Appointment, Evaluation, and Promotion of Instructors AddRan College of Liberal Arts

College of Engineering, Forestry & Natural Sciences Conditions of Faculty Service Guidelines for Annual Evaluation, Promotion, and Tenure

Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Criteria and Procedures. College of Nursing The Ohio State University

College of Business Administration Sabbatical Application and Procedures. Background

The University of Western Ontario

SABBATICAL LEAVE. 2. Only Tenured Members are eligible for Sabbatical Leave.

Staff Wage and Salary Guidelines

A. An estimation of the soundness of the applicant s proposal, such as:

Academic Council Policies and Procedures

UNC-CH School of Medicine Department of Allied Health Sciences FACULTY COMPENSATION PLAN FY16

BYLAWS COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES (CCS) 1.0 COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES MEMBERSHIP

Guidelines for Departmental Faculty Compensation Plans. University of Massachusetts Medical School & UMass Memorial Healthcare, Inc.

Faculty Operating Manual

MINIMUM NAMED ENDOWMENT AND FUND LEVELS POLICY

Salary Document. College of Applied Sciences and Technology Ball State University Approved by CAST Salary Committee:

University of Missouri-Columbia. MU Sinclair School of Nursing. GUIDELINES for APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, and PROMOTION of NON-REGULAR FACULTY

SECTION SEVEN PERSONNEL POLICIES: LIBRARIANS

GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Selected Presidential Policies

SCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR RETENTION, PROMOTION, TENURE, AND PERIODIC REVIEW

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Promotion and Tenure Guidelines

Policy on Academic Tracks and Promotions for the School of Nursing (SON) at the American University of Beirut (AUB)

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

A. Financial Planning for Faculty Throughout the Life Cycle. B. Retirement Planning From the University s Perspective

HHMI Investigator Program Information 2015 HHMI Investigator Competition. Frequently Asked Questions

Department of Art and Design Governance Document Approved

Standards for Promotion and Tenure Required by Section 7.12, Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure. Department of Psychology College of Liberal Arts

HANDBOOK OF SUPERVISION AND EXAMINATION. Part I: Course-based Master's Degree

2. CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, AND PROMOTION OF FULL-TIME FACULTY MEMBERS, UCSDM

Department of History Policy 1.1. Faculty Evaluation. Evaluation Procedures

Academic Policies and Procedures Manual. Rogers State University. January 2013

The George Washington University Faculty Code (pg.4) IV. APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION, AND TENURE

GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL

UW REGULATION Regulations of the University Libraries

Article VII Sabbatical Program

ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS GUIDELINES

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)

PROCEDURES FOR ACADEMIC FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL STAFF SALARIES

UWW Faculty Sabbatical FAQs. Application and Acceptance: 1. What is a sabbatical?

POLICIES CONCERNING ADJUNCT FACULTY

The award of Principal Investigator status does not in itself justify a tier change to the Research Scientist/Scholar series.

DIVISION OF SOCIAL WORK SCHOOL APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCES EBERLY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY

INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS: ESTABLISHMENT, ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE, FACULTY APPOINTMENTS AND PROCESSES THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO

BRIDGE FUNDING AND SALARY SUPPORT POLICY

INFORMATION GUIDE FOR APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTION, AND TENURE (APT)

WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES. LIBRARY FACULTY GOVERNANCE POLICIES [Department Policy Statement] TABLE OF CONTENTS

University of North Florida (INSAT) Equity Accountability Plan

caut handbook for new faculty. negotıatıng startıng salarıes

Faculty Appointments Office of Academic Affairs

University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition

The committee appointed by the Dean/Librarian to conduct the hiring process within the appropriate academic unit.

2. All terms of compensation and workload must be included in the formal letter of offer submitted for approval to the Provost and the Chancellor.

BY-LAWS OF THE EDWARD J. BLOUSTEIN SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND PUBLIC POLICY. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

APPLICATION FOR SABBATICAL LEAVE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. UIN: RANK: Date:

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND FOUNDATIONS 2013 APPOINTMENT, SALARY, PROMOTION, AND TENURE POLICIES

ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY Graduate Faculty Policy

Academic Titles in Trinity College Dublin

DEPARTMENT PLAN. The Department of Counseling, Educational, and Developmental Psychology. College of Education and Human Development

COUNSELING FACULTY EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR RETENTION, PROMOTION, TENURE AND PERIODIC REVIEW

Washkewicz College of Engineering Requirements and Procedures for Tenure & Promotion

RANK AND PROMOTIONS GUIDELINES REVISED OCTOBER 2008

IV. Conditions of Academic Appointment

SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE

University Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services. Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Clinical Faculty Remuneration Policy. Date: January 27, 2015 Policy ID: Status: Final

I. Bylaws 2. II. Mission and Organization of the Department of Psychology 3. III. Administrative Structure of the Department of Psychology 5

BYLAWS OF THE COLLEGE OF THE PACIFIC (Version 1.9)

CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007)

B. Probationary Evaluations

GRADUATE FACULTY APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS. School of Nursing. Date approved by the Department: NA

(a) ACDEANNOTE (Faculty Performance Expectations: Practical Guidance)

I. Preamble II. Weighting of Promotion and Tenure Criteria III. Appointment Criteria for Tripartite Faculty Assistant Professor...

FACULTY SALARY MERIT PLANS {effective Spring 2006} COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE M.A. THESIS DEFENCE IN THE FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

BYLAWS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR DESIGN COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE AND DANCE THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY

School of Public Health Academic Affairs Handbook

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE. Department of Linguistics & Cognitive Science. Promotion and Tenure Document

Missouri Department of Natural Resources Administrative Policies and Procedures

WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF AVIATION POLICY STATEMENT

The University of Florida College of Dentistry

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF LAW DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL LEGAL STUDIES TENURE AND PROMOTION PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS

DHS Policy & Procedure for Promotion of Clinical Faculty

Department of Social Work. Departmental Guidelines for Tenure, Promotion and Post- Tenure Review for AY

Department of Marketing / College of Business Florida State University BYLAWS. Approved by a majority of faculty

SELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS

BYLAWS OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTICLE I. Name

Transcription:

SALARY ENHANCEMENT FOR CONTINUED ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Preface The salaries of those at the rank of professor at West Virginia University have historically lagged behind those of professors at peer institutions. Senate Bill 547 was designed in part to bring average faculty salaries to 90 percent of the average of peer institutions by 2000. While that goal was accomplished for the general category of faculty with the average salary at 90.4 percent of that of peers by 2000-2001, the average salary for those at the rank of professor at that time was 86.9 percent of that of professors at peer institutions in the Southern Regional Education Board. Since then, the salaries of professors have lagged even further behind those of their peers. In fall 2003, the last year for which complete data is available, WVU professor salaries were 80 percent of those of professors at the HEPC-designated peer group and of professors at all institutions similar to WVU in the nation. Professors salaries are further from those of their peers than faculty in any other tenure-track rank. Some of the reasons for this discrepancy are historical. First, many of those who are presently professors were promoted to that rank (and the rank of associate professor) prior to 1986-87 when the West Virginia Code was changed to specify a 10 percent salary increment upon promotion. West Virginia University continues to take advantage of the permission provided for such an increase in Code and provides a 10 percent increase upon promotion. Second, many faculty at the rank of professor are also more likely to have experienced across-the-board salary increases, which were the norm prior to the adoption of salary plans that recognized merit. The legislature often mandated salary increases of the same dollar amount or same percentage increase, regardless of merit or distance from one s peers. In 1995-96, salary plans that included some recognition of merit became the practice at West Virginia University. While their salaries do not always reflect it, many professors are among the most productive faculty at WVU. Their accomplishments are often the basis of the WVU s national reputation for scholarship. While endowed chairs and professorships recognize the accomplishments of some professors, such positions and the salary enhancements that accompany them are not available to all the professors who may merit them. Even those with chaired professorships may have lower salaries than their peers. Professors have demonstrated their loyalty to WVU and the state by remaining at the institution, often for decades, even though they could be better compensated elsewhere. It is time that the salary gap for professors be addressed by WVU. Doing so will reward dedicated professors for their accomplishments. It will encourage continued accomplishment and foster retention. It may also enhance retention at other ranks as

faculty members recognize the opportunity for further salary enhancement once they are fully promoted. Program The Salary Enhancement for Continued Academic Achievement program establishes a reward and incentive plan for faculty members at the rank of professor. The program provides for up to two increases in the base salaries of qualifying faculty members and is available to both the General University and the Health Sciences Center faculty. This program is one of the opportunities available to help accomplished professors maintain a competitive salary. Other opportunities include the 10 percent pay increase provided upon promotion in rank, the performance-based pay increases provided through the University s salary increase program and the availability of endowed chairs and professorships in many colleges and departments and in the institution at large. The program provides for two increases to the faculty m ember s base salary but no special title recognition. The University will not restrict the total number of persons receiving this enhancement. Qualifying professors may receive an initial increase of 7.5 percent of the previous year s base after a minimum five full years1 in rank and may be eligible for consideration for a second increase of 5 percent five full years after the first increase took effect. In both cases, the award will be based on performance. The incentives, when awarded to a faculty member holding the rank of professor, will apply as long as that person retains that rank at West Virginia University. Application to the program is optional. Salary enhancements provided under this program are in addition to any performancebased increase for which a faculty member may be eligible in the year of application. An applicant must: Eligibility Hold the rank of tenured Professor2, tenured Extension Professor, University Librarian, Research, Clinical or Extension Clinical Professor or Clinical-Track Professor. Have served at least five full years at WVU in that rank prior to application. An approved leave3 for a sabbatical or professional development activity will be 1 Review of someone who has served five full years would occur in the sixth year with any increase taking effect during the seventh year. 2 In rare occasions, someone may have been appointed at the rank of Professor or Extension Professor without the award of tenure. Such persons must have earned tenure and been in rank for five full years before being eligible for this program.

considered as service in rank. Application may be made in the sixth year in rank. The increase, if awarded, will take effect with the annual contract for the subsequent academic year. Have a 1.0 FTE appointment at the time of application and award. Demonstrate consistently significant and substantial contributions in the traditional areas of the University s mission (research, teaching, and service) at a level similar to those contributions that qualified the faculty member for promotion to the rank of tenured Professor, tenured Extension Professor, University Librarian, Research, Clinical, Extension Clinical Professor or Clinical- Track Professor. Fulfill expectations for performance established through a written work assignment that is agreed upon in advance by the candidate, candidate s chairperson or other immediate supervisor, and dean in consultation with the Provost or Vice President for Health Sciences. Such an assignment will normally be established upon a faculty member s promotion to the rank of professor. The assignment will be developed in the context of the unit s mission and its current guidelines and expectations for promotion.4 Unit needs will dictate work assignments, and any change in a professor s work assignment must be made in writing. The written work assignment will specify the performance expectations for the faculty member in the areas of teaching, research and/or service. For those promoted to the rank of professor effective 2005-2006 or later, the written work assignment normally will be in effect for five full years before the professor is eligible for an increase. For those promoted in earlier years, who may not have a written work assignment for the entire period, reviews may be based on a combination of a written work assignment and the faculty member s record to that point. Initial implementation plans for such faculty members will be circulated separately. Professors with administrative assignments other than that of dean and those in the University s central administration are eligible for salary enhancements under this program. Associate and Assistant Deans and Chairpersons with the rank of professor are among the administrators who may be eligible for the program. The review of their accomplishments will be based on their faculty assignments unless a written work assignment provides that their administrative duties will be 3 Other leaves including unpaid leaves are not applicable to the time in rank. 4 In most units, the raters will be a departmental committee and department chair. In some situations, ratings by a dean or college committee may also be available. In units without a departmental structure, the raters may be a school committee and school dean.

considered. The increase received by administrators will be on their underlying faculty salary but not on any administrative supplement. A professor who has received a salary increase under this program is eligible to apply for an additional 5 percent increase in the sixth year of full-time service following the first increase. Continued significant and substantial contributions will be expected. All of the provisions of this policy also apply to a second application for an enhancement including the requirement for a written work assignment that has normally been in effect for five full years. Application Application is optional and anyone who meets the eligibility criteria may apply. Application is by a memo from the faculty member requesting consideration for the program to the faculty member s chairperson or other immediate supervisor. Criteria Applicants shall be evaluated according to the qualitative expectations now used by the University in judging eligibility for promotion to rank of professor or the equivalent. A faculty member recognized under this program will have performance that continues to make significant and substantial contributions and reflects the qualitative expectations of one at the rank of professor. Additionally, a preponderance of characterizations of excellent or good in the faculty member s work assignment(s) will normally be expected as minimal evidence of continued productivity. Ratings for all areas will be considered, whether or not an area is one in which a significant contribution is expected. For purposes of this program, preponderance is normally defined as at least 80 percent of the ratings being excellent or good. In no instance will an applicant who has received a rating of unsatisfactory in any area in the five full years preceding application be considered. For professors who have been at that rank for many years, the review will be on the five full-years immediately preceding application. Productivity in all of the following areas will be judged: Scope and quality of research, scholarly and/or artistic contributions Quality of teaching Contributions to the public good, especially in service to West Virginia Service contributions are those that are within a person's professional expertise as a faculty member, and performed with one's university affiliation identified. Service contributions may include those made in an administrative role at the department, college or university level. For Health Sciences Center faculty members, service includes patient care activities. Review Process

Applicants for this program will work with their chairperson to provide the information required for review. That information will be specified in an annual message from the Provost s Office, which will include a timetable for applications and review. The information will include: 1. A spreadsheet with the ratings received in each area of performance expectation from each rater4 for each year. The ratings provided must be for at least the immediately preceding five years. Faculty members may attach additional ratings, if they wish. Ratings for all areas, whether or not the area is an area of significant contribution, will be considered. 2. Annual review letters from each level of review for each year for which ratings are provided. 3. An up-dated vita that makes evident the publications, presentations and other significant academic activities since promotion to the rank of professor. These materials will be forwarded to the faculty member s dean with any comments from the chairperson about the applicant s performance. All materials will be added subsequently to the faculty member s personnel file but the complete personnel file will be forwarded only if requested by the dean or other reviewers. The dean will review the materials and determine whether the faculty member is eligible for salary enhancement. The dean s determination and spreadsheet of ratings will be forwarded to the Provost or Vice President for Health Sciences, as appropriate, for review and final approval prior to the award of the salary increment. If an applicant is denied an increase, at least one full year must pass since his/her review for the program before he/she may apply again for an increase. Funding Funding for the salary enhancement will be provided from the source(s) usually used to fund the faculty member s salary. In most instances, the funds will be centrally allocated. In some instances, grant or other external funding will be used because that is the usual source of funding for the faculty member s position. If a faculty member has a twelve-month contract, the increase will be applicable to all twelve months. If the faculty member enters a phased retirement program or reduces the appointment FTE, the amount of the salary enhancement and any increments added to it will be proportionally reduced. The remaining funds reverting to the central pool or other source used to fund the salary increase. Upon resignation or retirement, the full amount of the salary enhancement and any increases added to it will revert to the central pool rather

than remaining in the college or department. The reversion of funds will provide an ongoing source of funding for the program. ************************************************************************ Adopted: February 14, 2005 by the WVU Faculty Senate Adopted: April 8, 2005 by the West Virginia University Board of Governors