NPD Portfolio Management for a Global Manufacturer



Similar documents
Unleashing your growth potential Product Innovation and Development

Global Headquarters: 5 Speen Street Framingham, MA USA P F

PTC RETAIL PLM SOLUTION

2011 NASCIO Nomination Business Improvement and Paperless Architecture Initiative. Improving State Operations: Kentucky

Next-Generation Supply Management

AberdeenGroup. Procurement in New Product Development: Ensuring Profit from Innovation. Business Value Research Series

Ten Ways to Generate Higher Returns from Your Innovation Investments

University of Wisconsin Platteville IT Governance Model Final Report Executive Summary

Innovation Management Part II

Product Lifecycle Management for the Pharmaceutical Industry

Innovation Portfolio Management Process

Business to business (B2B) corporations with strong cash. Merger and Acquisition Success: The Sales Force Integration Imperative

Aligning IT with Business Goals through Strategic Planning

5 Keys to Effective Innovation and New Product Development (NPD) Planning. Copyright Sopheon plc. All rights reserved worldwide.

CASE STUDY. Barber Foods. Successful Trade Promotion Optimization Strategy Improves Retail Effectiveness. Challenge. Solution.

Procurement Programmes & Projects P3M3 v2.1 Self-Assessment Instructions and Questionnaire. P3M3 Project Management Self-Assessment

Symbios Overview Lean Supply Chain Quality Improvement Customer Satisfaction Productivity Speed Cost

The Product Portfolio Management Benchmark Report. Achieving Maximum Product Value

Your asset is your business. The more challenging the economy, the more valuable the asset becomes. Decisions are magnified. Risk is amplified.

A To Do List to Improve Supply Chain Risk Management Capabilities

Visual Enterprise Architecture

White Paper from Global Process Innovation. Fourteen Metrics for a BPM Program

Understanding the Real Impact of Social Media Monitoring on the Value Chain

Product Lifecycle Management in the Food and Beverage Industry. An Oracle White Paper Updated February 2008

Procurement must be more than just cost cutting

Product Life Cycle Management in Life Sciences Industry

Relationship management is dead! Long live relationship management!

How To Improve Project Management

The Aberdeen Vault Navigating the Goldmine. A Member Benefit

Identifying critical success factors for. Enterprise Social Networks (ESNs)

thyu Engineering Change Management 2.0: Better Business Decisions from Intelligent Change Management

Table of contents. Best practices in open source governance. Managing the selection and proliferation of open source software across your enterprise

The expression better, faster, cheaper THE BUSINESS CASE FOR PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

IT Cost Reduction. Doing More with Less. Anita Ballaney, Vishwanath Shenoy, Michael Gavigan. Strategic IT cost reduction - Doing More with Less

Avaya Strategic Communications. Consulting. A Strong Foundation for Superior Business Results. Table of Contents. Taking Business Vision to Reality

Tech-Clarity Insight: Top 5 Misconceptions about Innovation Management Software

Transportation Solutions Built on Oracle Transportation Management. Enterprise Solutions

Accolade. Decision Support for the Business of Product Development. Knowledge-Powered Solutions to Maximize Returns on Product Development Investments

Making A Case For Project Management

A discussion of information integration solutions November Deploying a Center of Excellence for data integration.

Global Sourcing. Conquer the Supply Chain with PLM and Global Sourcing Solutions. Visibility Planning Collaboration Control

Mobility Strategy Maturity Model

SALES AND OPERATIONS PLANNING BLUEPRINT BUSINESS VALUE GUIDE

Delivering Corporate Social Responsibility through Project Portfolio Management

Understanding the Best Approaches and Tools to Manage the Complexity of Innovation

Channel-Distribution Challenges

Accenture Enterprise Services for Chemicals. Delivering high performance in enterprise resource planning

AberdeenGroup. New Product Development: Profiting from Innovation. Business Value Research Series. December 2005

InfoGlobalData specialise in B2B Lists and Appending Services.

P3M3 Portfolio Management Self-Assessment

T r a n s f o r m i ng Manufacturing w ith the I n t e r n e t o f Things

Strategy & the firm. Value creation. Value creation

Why Data Governance - 1 -

STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE WITH BI COMPETENCY CENTER. Student Rodica Maria BOGZA, Ph.D. The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies

Organizing for Sourcing Excellence Insights for impact on profitability and revenue.

Much case study material adds further weight to an experience-packed text, showing major benefits that can be gained by effective CRM.

Critical Steps to Help Small and Mid-Sized Businesses Ensure CRM Success

Enterprise Architecture Program. Key Initiative Overview

September 17, 1:00 PM. Dean Sorensen, Founder, IBP Collaborative

Information Governance 2.0 A DOCULABS WHITE PAPER

How do you manage the growing complexity of software development? Is your software development organization as responsive to your business needs as

PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROADMAP, Executive Summary

THE NEXT GENERATION OF HR SHARED SERVICES SUBHEADLINE RUNS HERE AND HERE AND HERE AND HERE

Six Key Trends Changing Supply Chain Management Today. Choosing the optimal strategy for your business

SharePoint as a Business Application, Not Just a Collaboration Tool

Introduction to ITIL for Project Managers

Driving Business Value with Big Data and Analytics

Accenture Enterprise Services for Metals. Delivering high performance in enterprise resource planning

Strategic Marketing Performance Management: Challenges and Best Practices

Measuring product development performance in high-tech companies

Supply chain segmentation: the next step in supply chain excellence. Rich Becks, General Manager, E2open. Contents. White Paper

The optimization maturity model

Metrics that Matter. From the study The Measurable Contribution of Marketing

Avanade Point of View. Getting it right with a project and portfolio management solution

Evaluation Guide. Sales and Operations Planning Performance Blueprint

Drive to the top. The journey, lessons, and standards of global business services. kpmg.com

How To Improve Service Transition

Operations Excellence in Professional Services Firms

Transcription:

20 May 2009 NPD Portfolio Management for a Global Manufacturer PLM BEST PRACTICE CONFERENCE 2009 SEOUL KOREA Management Consultants Where Innovation Operates

Introducing PRTM PRTM is Premier Operational Strategy Consulting Firm Specializing in Operational Innovation 30, (Operational Strategy, Innovation and Execution) : PACE (Product And Cycletime Excellence) : SCOR (Supply Chain Operations Reference) 1,200 6,000 90% Consulting Magazine Kennedy Research 600 18 :,, Consumer Packaged Goods ( ),, /, & Samsung SDS (2007) PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 2

What is Portfolio Management? Portfolio Management supports management investment decisions Setting, communicating, and aligning project priorities with a company s strategy Choosing the level of investment in projects relative to others Making strategic resource allocations Portfolio Management s scope includes all types of projects competing more or less for the same scarce resources New product development, IT, capital deployment, technology development, customer care, infrastructure, six sigma, acquisition integration, business process improvements Includes ongoing, potential, and planned projects PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 3

What is Portfolio Management? continued Portfolio Management is at the heart of innovation management Strategy Development Portfolio and Pipeline Management Project Execution Revenue Planning and Budgeting Functional Resource Management PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 4

Why Companies Should Care Poor Portfolio Management Practices Informal Approach Problematic Decisions Resources spread thin New project queue grows Quality of execution suffers Poor Business Performance Slow, late projects Business value not delivered Weak decisions Good projects starved Incremental approach Missed Opportunities Few high value projects Too many low value projects Non-rigorous selection criteria Projects cancelled late Constant second guessing Development budgets wasted Projects languish, adoption is slow Reference: Adapted from Portfolio Management for New Products, Robert Cooper, Perseus Books, 1998 PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 5

Case Study Overview: SmartCo Two billion dollar global supplier and solutions provider with a strong brand equity; markets thousands of products in 60+ countries Opportunities Threats Possibility: profitable growth Opportunities for high-value promotions and tie-ins Innovative solutions to drive increased premiums Complexity of products increasing Increasing commoditization pressures Reality: revenues and margins weakening Grow market share leadership The Wal-Mart effect Leverage brand to demand premiums Demand for greater product variety/sku proliferation Maintain/extend dominance of channels Poor historical track record for project execution Approach: Smartco Implemented PACE project and portfolio excellence with PRTM Deployed IT-enabled portfolio and process management with Sopheon Accolade Results: Dramatic reduction in time to market Improved project execution capability Reduced administrative burden Increased profitability PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 6

SmartCo Had Hit a Roadblock SmartCo Lacked Consistent, Strong Project Management Skills Project management not integrated; not able to emphasize cross-functional interdependencies Project accountability not clearly defined Frequent specification/scope changes No effective processes or systems to estimate project schedules or resource requirements Most project teams unable to develop or manage realistic work plans No consistency of process across multiple divisions and locations The Corporate Portfolio Could Not Be Harmonized Across Opportunities Difficult to obtain a realistic forecast of resources and a corporate roll-up of resource supply/demand Resource allocation sub-optimized Broad portfolio and resource availability not integrated into stage reviews Unable to make tradeoff decisions across new product development opportunities Difficult to obtain corporate NPD views Manual tools not in real time and insufficient to support decision making PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 7

Goal: Move SmartCo to Portfolio Excellence Capabilities are typically additive and implemented in stages, leading to breakthrough improvements Stage 0 Informal Management Practices based on individual experience SmartCo Prior to Project Stage 1 Functional Management Management of activities within functions to drive quality and consistency Average for Industry* Stage 2 Project Excellence Excellence within and across functions to drive effective, rapid execution from concept through product retirement Best-in- Class Stage 3 Portfolio Excellence Alignment of strategic processes and plans to drive innovation, platform leverage, and portfolio balance Stage 4 Cross- Enterprise Excellence Collaboration with partners, suppliers, and customers to optimize value, responsiveness, and development of resources across enterprises Average Growth: 8% 12% 19% Profit Advantage: 35% 54% 67% TTM Index: 2.0 1.0 0.8 PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 8

SmartCo s Processes Provided a Skeleton Benefits of the Existing Staged Development Process Brought structure to a situation that was nearly in chaos Introduced common terminology to an organization that was not very process mature Outlined expectations for a new product as it moved through the development cycle Limitations of Generic Staged Development Process Difficult to coordinate cross-functional, cross-group work No credible way to test the reasonability of project schedules No management across projects Little emphasis on critical path project planning and management Did not always provide adequate info for effective decision making Decision processes not well defined Resourcing priorities unclear Existing Processes Could Not Enable Best-in-Class NPD Performance PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 9

Improvements Required to Attain Goal Putting Meat on the Skeleton Optimized coordination among functions and teams by including well-defined roles and responsibilities Designed tools, templates, and processes for cross-project and crossdivisional consistency Developed planning standards based on project complexity and major blocks of work Integrated critical path into standard work plans Emphasized high-quality information availability for evaluation and tradeoff analysis Structured the front-end discovery process to increase the innovation pipeline flow PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 10

Three Primary Objectives Maximize corporate NPD return Emphasize value measures other than financial (e.g., urgency, complexity) Balance resource supply and demand Align priorities with staffing decisions 2. Balance Resources 1. Maximize Value 3. Link to Strategy Create a portfolio of programs that helps achieve corporate objectives Ensure that development of priorities aligns with business strategy PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 11

Goal: Create Corporate Portfolio Excellence Clear roadmap for cross-functionally managing new product development efforts Structured Development Process Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 An Optimized, Critical Path Enabled Project Management Roadmap Is Developed for Each Development Project Customized MS Project Work Plan Credible estimates to forecast project cycle-times and the multi-functional resources required for individual projects Optimized standard project management template applicable across all project types, Cycle-Time and Resource Standards Project Type / Average Best-in-Class Typical R&D Resources Complexity Cycle-time* (months) (FTE s) Low (< 3.5) 4.5 0.5-5 Medium (>3.5, <6.0) 12.5 4-21 High (>6.0) 25.0 15-90 Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Low 0.7 0.6 1.8 1.1 0.4 Medium 1.9 1.6 4.9 3.0 1.1 High 3.8 3.3 9.8 6.0 2.3 Generic Project Management Template Resources Critical path Deliverables PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 12

1. Action on Questionable Project Investments PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 13

2. Critical Skill Sets Balanced PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 14

3. Investment Consistent With Strategy PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 15

4. Prioritized Projects Adequately Staffed PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 16

5. Decision Processes Operationalized to Teams PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 17

6. Processes Monitored to Track Improvement PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 18

7. Reduced Administrative Burden PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 19

Improvements Applied to Critical NPD Areas Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phas e 4 Corporate Portfolio Management Ensured a tight focus on the most valuable opportunities Linked R&D investment with business strategy and risk Provided ability to manage critical resources Operationalized NPD Process Upgraded staged development process with cross-functional integration and project management capability Aligned lexicon, behaviors, and metrics to increase transparency, predictability, and adoption Structured decision forums for effective governance across the company Enabled Tools and IT Systems Used systems and role-based process workflows to make decisions executable and controllable Dramatically reduced administrative burden PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 20

Results: 66% Reduction in Time to Market Cycle-Time Performance Before and After Improvement Initiative Previous Performance First Samples Ready Customer Approval First Plant Sample Prelim Qual. Ready for First Order Shipment New Performance 66% Reduction Realized 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Average Cumulative Cycle Time (Days) Also Increased market share Increased product revenue Decreased cost Increased profitability PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 21

Portfolio Management Improves Performance Maximizes Value Improves Strategic Fit Achieves Balance PRTM Portfolio Management 20 May 2009 2009 PRTM Proprietary CONFIDENTIAL 22