Examining population and land use patterns provides

Similar documents
SECTION ONE CHAPTER 2: A LAND USE PROFILE OF MANCHESTER

Corridor Goals and Objectives

Johnson Ferry Landing

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

9.0 Alta Vista/Faircrest Heights/Riverview Park (Key Principles)

Market Analysis for Padre Boulevard Initiative in the Town of South Padre Island, TX

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory

Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:

SPECIAL USE PERMIT JCSA Groundwater Treatment Facility Staff Report for the November 5, 2001, Planning Commission Public Hearing

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

Restoration. a brief look at

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

City of Tampa Zoning Districts

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

The Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: May 19, 2015

CITY OF NORMANDY PARK MANHATTAN VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA STRATEGY AND CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD

How American Homes Vary By the Year They Were Built

City Code of ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Chapter 55 Zoning

ELEMENT 4 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

Michigan State University Ingham County Health Department Tri- County Regional Planning Commission Land Use and Health Resource Team

CHAPTER ONE: DEMOGRAPHIC ELEMENT

Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

Philadelphia County. Land Use and Growth Management Profile

Conducting a Land Use Inventory

Commercial/Industrial Market Analysis for Scott County, Minnesota

CHAPTER 2 - Population and Economy

Real Estate Trends. in the Sacramento Region. Key Points

Village of Spring Valley Comprehensive Plan

City of Arnold, Missouri

University Pointe Opportunity Summary. Remaining in Phase I. University Pointe. Hwy. 29 & Brookside Lane Charlotte, NC.

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between THE CITY OF BALTIMORE And THE MID-ATLANTIC FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

Understanding the tax base consequences of local economic development programs

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Zoning Districts, Gwinnett County, Georgia

Planning Commission Staff Report

Greenway Area Study Recommended Master Plan Executive Summary November, 2007 Introduction

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

Note: The following are informal notes based on information received during this public meeting.

The principle of excess land is a fundamental concept in appraisal practice,

Lents Town Center Mixed-Use Market Study Office Market Analysis Lents, Oregon

12 February 8, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Staff Report General Development Plan/Master Plan Aldermanic District: 1 County Commission District: 2 MPC File No PLAN February 23, 2016

CRP 525: Assignment 2 Mixed Housing Neighborhoods in College Towns. Case Study: Indiana Borough, Pennsylvania

Eurobodalla. Area Profile. Key Industry: Tourism & accommodation, Retail, Health & Community Services, Education

D3 April 8, 2015 Public Hearing

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES The following sections list the implementation strategies for following chapters.

Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary

7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

Motorcycle & Pedestrian Master Plans in Indianapolis, Indiana

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M

HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH GUIDELINES

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. in this chapter. 8.1 Overview of Economic Conditions. 8.2 Priority Economic Development Needs

Healthy City Strategy: Housing for Children and Families. Housing Policy & Projects June 9, 2015

Southwest Light Rail Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

Town of Montezuma, New York Community Survey 2015

Chapter 7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES and SERVICES PLAN

ARTICLE VIII SECTION 8.1 O-I OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT

CITY MANAGER $175,000 - $195,000. Plus Excellent Benefits. Apply by March 20, 2016 (open until filled)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AROOSTOOK Transportation and Housing. Introductory Section

Frequently Asked Transmission Pipeline Questions

PA-14-04/ORDINANCE (DTS# ) 24/7 DEVELOPMENT HOLDINGS, LLC BAYSHORE BLACKROCK

Market Analysis Retail Housing Office [CITY OF BERLIN MARKET ANALYSIS] City of Berlin, Wisconsin

Economic Development Element

Fiscal impact analysis of three development scenarios in Nashville-Davidson County, TN

PC Nate Lundgren-Auto Repair Business Conditional Use Permit 9/7/11 Applicants

The goal is to transform data into information, and information into insight. Carly Fiorina

I I I I I I. 8. Encourage equitable taxation and assessment policies for

How To Improve Housing In Seminole County

INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES

TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF NORTH SALEM WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW # OF THE YEAR 2012

Model Subdivision and Land Development (SALDO) Subdivision/ Land Development Presentation Overview. Why Subdivision and Land Development Regulations?

FILE NO.: Z-6915-C. Gamble Road Short-form PCD and Land Alteration Variance Request

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2.

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

DRAFT POLICIES COUNTY OF HALIBURTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE

A Break Even Analysis and Potential Profitability of a Proposed Residential Development within the City of La Crosse, Wisconsin USA

AVALON PARK WEST (FORMERLY NEW RIVER) PD/MPUD- NARRATIVE FOR DRI RESCISSION, PD SUBAREA AMENDMENT AND MPUD SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION.

College Park North Retail Development The Woodlands, Texas

House Bill Land Conveyance Pictorial Package

Texas Case Studies in Access Management. Ed Hard, TTI

Texas Motor Speedway Area Master Plan January 2009 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE

Multifamily Housing: Sustainable Development in Efficient, Walkable Communities

Technical Report 1: Regional Demographic Profile

University of Missouri-St. Louis North Station

AREA: 2.37 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF. Single-family, Non-conforming machine shop

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUMMARY OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

FOR SALE. The Friedman Building th Avenue South, Seattle Nicholas T. Gill Allan Friedman

Planning for the future. building a great city, great neighbourhoods

# U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E S P E C I F I C P L A N Page 1-1 # 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 University Avenue, Historical Context

Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016

SEEKING COMPLETENESS WAIVERS AND PRELIMINARY & FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL

Residential Market. Downtown Houston

Transcription:

Chapter 6 and Land Use Examining population and land use patterns provides insight on growth and change in a community. and land use are interconnected, because our human footprint on the land is reflected in population growth or recession. For example, college students often concentrate near campus, which may result in a need for rental units. On the other hand, families with children tend to prefer larger lots in close proximity to community facilities, such as high-quality schools and parks. This chapter will examine population and land use trends over time, their impact on each other and future population projections. 1970-2007 Figure 6.1 Change in Neighboring Communities, US Census Bureau Muskegon Township is the most populated Township in Muskegon County with a 2007 estimated population of 18,352, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Like many suburban communities in Michigan, the Township has seen relatively steady growth since 1970. From 1960 to 1970, however, the population declined significantly (by 12%); but this is a result of the City of Muskegon annexing a portion of the Township during that decade. The Township s population in 2007 was estimated at 18,352. Since 1970, the population has increased by an average of.9% per year, as illustrated in Figure 6.1. In 2000, Muskegon Township comprised 10.42% of the total population in Muskegon County, an increase of.8% since 1990, and an increase of 1.19% since 1980. Total population in 2000 was 17,737, according to the U.S. Census. The Township s proximity to the City of Muskegon and the accessibility to US-31 provides excellent connectivity to regional attractions, jobs, schools and natural resources, helping to account for the steady population increases. The 2007 U.S. Census indicates that population growth in Muskegon Township and in neighboring communities has moderated somewhat, with the exception of Dalton Township. Changes in economic conditions can often have a notable impact on population, as people will generally move to be near the best employment opportunities. Since population growth seems to be tapering off in many Muskegon County communities, it can be concluded that the cause for the Township s recent relatively moderated growth is because of regional issues, such as the West Michigan economy. 49 Chapter 6. and Land Use

Mapping U.S. Census Data at the block level shows areas of population growth and decline. Map 6.1 illustrates areas in the Township where population shifts have occurred from 1990-2000. shifts show areas of the Township that are growing and may require additional services in the future, such as road improvements, utility expansion, provision of parks and recreational facilities, etc. Areas of decline may be candidates for redevelopment or be experiencing a shift in land use that may be reinforced in the future land use plan. Consideration should be given to the current zoning in these areas versus current land use and whether these areas of decline are no longer suitable or desirable for residential development. The northern and eastern sections of Muskegon Township, which are more rural and have more readily developable green-field sites, have seen the greatest increase in population from 1990 to 2000. This is Map 6.1 Change by Census Block, US Census Bureau consistent with a national trend during this decade of moving out of the City to rural areas with large lots. Many areas immediately adjacent to the City of Muskegon saw a decrease in population of up to 12%, reinforcing this national trend. In addition to understanding where people live, information about who they are is also a component of land use planning. Different age groups and population cohorts will have different needs and impacts on land use patterns. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, the median age in Muskegon Township was 34.3 years old, and the two largest age cohorts were between the ages of 35-39 and 10-14. This indicates that a significant number of families with school-aged children live in the Township, suggesting a need for parks, schools and other family amenities. It also provides some explanation to the residential development patterns within the Township, as families with children Figure 6.2 Gender and Age Distribution, US Census Bureau Number of People tend to prefer more suburban and rural neighborhoods with lower residential densities. The 20-to 24-year-old cohort is notably smaller than other age cohorts. This is typical in many suburban Michigan communities, as college-age individuals move away from home to pursue higher education opportunities or employment. There are a significant number of families with school-age children in the Township. Residents in the 30 to 49 age cohorts comprise the bulk of the working population and a large proportion of Township residents. 50 Chapter 6. and Land Use

While the size of each age cohort decreases after 45 to 49, it is worth noting that as the middle-aged population ages, demands for seniorrelated facilities and services will likely increase. The Township s Master Plan should include provisions for all age groups, including recreation, housing, barrier-free design and the promotion of social interaction within commercial nodes. Predicting future population growth is a fundamental tool in making long-term planning decisions. For example, if a community is expected to experience a significant increase in population over the life of the plan, attention should be given to directing growth, employment opportunities and recreation. However, if a community is expecting a decline in population, more attention could be paid to the retention of the existing population, redevelopment of existing housing stock and improving quality of life for current residents. Michigan s economy, which is resulting in massive job losses, population losses, foreclosures and business closings makes it difficult to project future population, especially when Muskegon Township has seen population spikes in the last two decades. Predicting future population growth is a fundamental tool in making long-term planning decisions. Growth Rate. The growth rate method projects future population growth or decline based on the rate of growth the Township has experienced in the past. The growth rate method assumes that growth in the future will occur at the same rate as has occurred annually between 2000 and 2007. According to the Census data, the annual average growth rate of Muskegon Township was 0.68% during that period. Based on a continuation of this rate of growth, the Township s population will reach 18,726 by the year 2010, 20,349 by the year 2020, and 23,219 by the year 2030. Average Annual Growth Rate 2007 2010 2020 2030 +0.68% 18,352 18,726 20,349 23,219 Arithmetic Method. The arithmetic method is similar to the growth rate method in that population projections are based on growth that occurred in preceding decades. This method, however, bases population growth on the average increase in the number of persons per year, rather than on the rate of growth. The following projections are based on the average increase of 124 persons annually between 1970 and 2007 in Muskegon Township. Average Change (number of persons) 2007 2010 2020 2030 +124 18,352 18,725 19,968 21,210 Constant Proportion. The constant proportion method projects the Township s population based on its proportion of Muskegon County s population. It assumes that the Township will continue to comprise the same proportion of County residents and therefore, The constant proportion method projects the Township s population based on its proportion of Muskegon County s population. is based largely on the population projections for the County. The West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission (WMSRDC) prepared population estimates for the County, which have been utilized to complete this table. In 2000, Muskegon Township comprised 10.42% of Muskegon County s population. Applying this percentage to the projections provided by WMSRDC, the Township s population will be 18,906 in the year 2010, 20,122 in the year 2020, and 21,416 in the year 2030. 51 Chapter 6. and Land Use

Percent of County 10.52% 2007 2010 2020 2030 Muskegon County 174,386 179,654 191,208 203,504 Muskegon Township 18,352 18,906 20,122 21,416 Building Permit. The building permit method may be the most reliable projection method in this economy because it projects population trends based on actual building permit data. It was determined that Muskegon Township has issued an average of 15.6 building permits for new residential construction annually since 2006. While the Township has building permit data dating to 2004, the figures have seen a sharp decline in five years. Therefore, averages of the last three years were used. Assuming that the building activity will continue at an average of 15.6 permits per year and utilizing the Township s average household size of 2.64 persons (according to the 2000 Census), future population figures can be estimated. This method predicts that Muskegon Township will increase by about 41 persons per year. Using this figure, the following projects the Township s population using the building permit method. Average Number of Permits Average household size Muskegon Township has issued an average of 15.6 building permits annually since 2006. 2007 2010 2020 2030 15.6 permits 2.64 persons 18,352 18,495 18,905 19,315 Table 6.1 Projection Summary Projection Method 2007 2010 2020 2030 Growth Rate 18,352 18,726 20,349 23,219 Arithmetic 18,352 18,725 19,968 21,210 Constant Proportion 18,352 18,720 19,924 21,205 Building Permit 18,352 18,496 18,905 19,315 Average 18,352 18,666 19,786 21,237 This projected increase in population will result in a modest increase in demand for public utilities and police and fire services; it may also result in greater land consumption if people continue the national trend of living on large lots outside of cities. In the context of a Master Plan, the population projections allow the Township to properly prepare for the additional demand with tools such as zoning, capital improvement planning and recreation planning, and by further strengthening cooperation with neighboring municipalities. Land Use Muskegon Township contains more than 15,257 acres of land according to data from Muskegon County s Mapping and GIS Department. One-third of that, or 5,510 acres, is not developed. This includes 2,700 acres of forestland and wetlands owned by the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Residential Figure 6.3 Land Use Distribution Averages. Because each method has strengths and weaknesses, an average of each of the projections is likely to result in more accurate results. When the four methods of projecting population are averaged, it results in a projected population in Muskegon Township of 18,666 in 2010, 19,786 in 2020, and 21,237 in 2030. 52 Chapter 6. and Land Use

land containing a dwelling accounts for 37% of the Township, or 5,697 acres. Consumers Energy owns 583 acres, or 3.8% of land in the Township containing high power transmission lines and access easements. Roadways account for 8% of the land use within the Township, including rights-of-way and developed roadways. Commercial and industrial lands occupy 5% and 4% of land respectively, while public lands, including churches, schools and government buildings, account for 6%. walking paths. Land owned by Consumers Energy carries transmission lines from the Cobb plant in the City of Muskegon. Residential Lands Residential land uses comprise the bulk land in the Township. With 5,697 acres, or 37% of the total land area in residential use, the majority is detached single-family residential. This also includes the Township s three manufactured housing communities, which account for approximately 220 acres. As shown in map 6.3, most of the residential land is located east of the City of Muskegon or north of the City of North Muskegon. In most areas, the residential use continues from one municipality to the next, avoiding significant land use conflicts. Residential land (vacant and improved) accounts for 72.86% of the total developed area within the Township. Map 6.2 Public/ Undevelopable Lands Map 6.3 Residential Lands Department of Natural Resources and Consumers Energy Lands Accounting for approximately 18% of the Township land area, the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE) is the largest single landowner within the Township. The State owned land runs along both sides of the river from the City of Muskegon across the Township and into Egelston Township to the east. Comprised of a combination of forest and wetlands, this area is undeveloped. While these areas are not likely to be developed, they have the potential to be used for recreation purposes, such as bike and Commercial and Industrial Lands Developed commercial and industrial land consumes a total of 1,338 53 Chapter 6. and Land Use

acres of land within the Township. side of the Township, near arterial roadways. Muskegon Township has two industrial parks. The John Wierengo Industrial Park is located at Evanston Avenue and Laketon Avenue, has an area of eighteen acres and is completely developed, but only 11 of those acres are currently occupied. The second industrial park is the Don Aley Industrial Park, which is located at Laketon Avenue and Milliron Road. The industrial parks have water and sewer service and are located on major arterial roadways. Commercial lands are located along major arterials and have been developed in a traditional strip pattern. Apple Avenue, Holton Road and Whitehall Roads are the primary commercial corridors, whereas Laketon is transitioning from a mixed residential corridor to a primarily industrial corridor. Along Apple Avenue, the portion of the corridor from US 31 east to Sheridan is densely developed and contains many retail strip centers setback from the road, allowing parking in front of the building. The Township Hall is located on Apple Avenue, and the bulk of the older, residential neighborhoods are nearby, providing opportunities for area residents to walk to nearby shops and restaurants. The Holton Road corridor contains a Meijer store, drawing customers from the Townships north of the Muskegon River. Whitehall Road contains more office development and less convenience commercial development as either Holton Road or Apple Avenue. Redevelopment of commercial corridors, especially those portions of commercial corridors closest to dense residential Vacant Lands The Township s vacant land is separated into one of several available Map 6.5 Vacant Lands Map 6.4 Commercial/ Industrial Lands Distribution of Vacant Land Figure 6.4 Distribution of Vacant Lands development, should be considered during the planning process. The industrial areas are generally adjacent to or near the west 54 Chapter 6. and Land Use

land use classifications by Muskegon County Mapping and GIS Department. Approximately 63% of the total vacant land is classified for residential uses. There are approximately 2,109 acres of vacant residential land based on the land use map provided by the County. As shown in Map 6.5, the vacant residential land is distributed across the Township with the highest concentrations along the Muskegon River, which may be difficult to develop due to soil and floodplain restrictions. Another area of vacant residential development is along the northern boundary of the Township, between Getty and Russell Road. Since this area is removed from developed commercial land, future land uses should be less intense, not requiring a significant demand for services. Vacant commercial and industrial land account for 377 acres and 890 acres, respectively. As indicated in Map 6.5 there is ample vacant commercial land remaining along the commercial corridors, however, it is located away from dense residential areas. Vacant industrial land is primarily located along Laketon, which is becoming the Township s primary industrial area. Figure 6.4 shows the distribution of vacant land by percent. Proportion of Land Use to Future Growth There is no generally accepted ratio of commercial, industrial and residential land use based on population or area of a municipality. What may seem like excessive industrial land in one community may not meet demand in another. Since communities are constantly evolving and dependent on demands and growth patterns beyond their borders, it is difficult to determine how much land should be devoted to each use. However, some generalizations can be made based on population projections for residential uses, national trends and studies conducted by the Urban Land Institute about commercial and industrial density based on employees per acre. Residential: The Township contains approximately 2,109 acres of vacant residential land and 5,697 acres of improved residential land. Average density is the number of households (6,828 from the 2000 U.S. Census) divided by the number of acres of improved residential land. Average density in Muskegon Township is.83 or one dwelling unit per.83 acres of land. Dividing density by available residential land, there are approximately 2,540 housing sites available. projections show an estimated increase of 2,571 people in the Township by the year 2030. With an average household size of 2.64 people per household (2000 US Census), there is a projected demand for 937 dwelling units by the year 2030 to accommodate projected population growth. Based on this data, there is a surplus of residential land equivalent to 1,603 dwelling units, or 1,330 acres of residential land in the Township. Commercial/Industrial/Office: According to the 2000 Census data, there are approximately 5,828 people employed in the Township. In terms of employees per square foot of building type, the Urban Land Institute estimates the following: 1 employee per 500 square feet of commercial 1 employee per 300 square feet of office 1 employee per 1.030 square feet of industrial Average of 610 square feet per employee With 5,828 employees and a national average of 610 square feet of commercial/office/industrial land per employee, the Township would need 3,555,080 square feet of commercial/office/industrial land to accommodate the number of workers in the Township. However, looking at Muskegon County land use data, the Township has the following number of acres developed as commercial/office/industrial: 707 acres of developed commercial/office land 631 acres of developed industrial land 1,338 acres or 58,283,280 square feet of commercial/office/ industrial land The Township has approximately 58,283,280 square feet of developed commercial/office/industrial land. Common planning practice indicates that only about 75% of a parcel of land use is used for buildings, and the remainder is devoted to parking, setbacks, drainage, etc. Therefore, there is approximately 43,712,460 square feet of building area devoted to commercial/office/industrial buildings in the Township. If there is approximately one employee per 610 square feet of building area, the Township has enough building area for 71,659 55 Chapter 6. and Land Use

employees. As mentioned previously, there are only 5,828 people working in the Township. Based on the estimates using existing land use and assuming national trends in square footage per employee, the Township has a large surplus (54,728,200 square feet or 1,256 acres) of existing commercial and industrial square footage. If the Township were to factor in the vacant commercial and industrial land, this surplus would grow even higher. Conclusion The interdependency of population and land use are evident in the development patterns within Muskegon Township. Areas showing a higher concentration of residential structures are in close proximity to the City of Muskegon and Apple Avenue, which is the main commercial corridor in the Township. The more suburban and rural areas of the community have lower residential density and less commercial development. The suburban and rural neighborhoods are often the most desirable for families, and this age group (ages 35-44) makes up a large demographic group within the Township. It will be important to direct resources to these areas of the Township having the potential for continued residential growth. It will also be important for the Township to focus resources in areas where foreclosure rates are high to prevent deterioration of the existing residential fabric (see Chapter 7, Housing and Neighborhoods). As the population projections indicate, the Township should not expect high levels of growth over the next 20 years. In fact, Muskegon Township residents are getting older, the younger generations are leaving after high school and the birth rates are decreasing. As a result, Township resources may be strained, and it will be important to prioritize available services to areas with the greatest need, highest potential and greatest population densities. Ensuring that the existing commercial corridors continue to maintain their competitive advantage will be essential. Connecting these commercial nodes to strong residential neighborhoods will provide more options for residents as they are able to walk, bike and drive to meet their daily 56 Chapter 6. and Land Use