Marcellus Shale Gas Poss/Res , , ,240. Marcellus Shale Oil Poss/Res , , ,240

Similar documents
For personal use only

Norwest Energy NL. Northern Perth Basin Farm-In Opportunities. PESA Deal Day Brisbane Shelley Robertson Asset Manager.

March 2015 MEGATRENDS IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

New Yo r k Marc e l l us and Utica Shales. 130,000 net acres Oil, natural gas liquids, and dry gas Access to major pipelines

Upstream Developments Generate Growing Hydrocarbon Gas Liquids Supply! Alan Farquharson, SVP - Reservoir Engineering & Economics!

INDEPENDENT REPORTS CONFIRM SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL FOR LINC ENERGY S SHALE OIL IN THE ARCKARINGA BASIN

Schuepbach Energy LLC

Oil and Gas Terms. Anticline: An arch of stratified rock layers that may form a trap for hydrocarbons.

By Gene Kitts, Senior Vice President-Mining Services, International Coal Group, Inc.

Topics: The Petroleum System. Origin of Petroleum. Arguments for biogenic origin. Google search : Origin of Petroleum : Hugoton Gas Field (Kansas)

IMPACT OF SHALE TECHNOLOGY ON HOUSTON REAL ESTATE

SWIFT ENERGY ANNOUNCES FIRST QUARTER 2015 RESULTS

Pad Design Key For Marcellus Drilling

Great Lakes Gold Rush: Valuing Mineral Rights in the Utica and Marcellus Shale Plays

THE OIL & GAS CONFERENCE

ASX Announcement GOOD OIL CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OUR FOCUS. The Company Announcement Officer ASX Ltd via electronic lodgement COOPER BASIN

Mineral rights ownership what is it and why is it so unique in the USA?

Turning Brownfields into Clean Energy. Today s Discussion

Shale Energy Produced Fluids Management and UIC Well Disposal Trends

E&P in Brief. A Wintershall Fact Sheet. Wintershall in Argentina. Annual production in Argentina approx. 25 million barrels of oil equivalent

Stock Pitch. Westen Koorbusch, Travis Wolf, Zachary Dukoff, Udit Agrawal, Isaac Fraynd

ISSUE 115 3rd April, 2013

Geologic Criteria for Eastern Kentucky Permanent CO 2 Storage (Saline reservoir test)

Assessment of Undiscovered Technically Recoverable Oil and Gas Resources of the Nation s Outer Continental Shelf, 2011(Includes 2014 Atlantic Update)

NATIONAL FUEL REPORTS THIRD QUARTER EARNINGS

The Growth of U.S. Natural Gas: An Uncertain Outlook for U.S. and World Supply

Renewable Energy from Depleted Oil Fields using Geothermal Energy. Ramsey Kweik Southern Methodist University Geothermal Lab

ADX ENERGY. Sidi Dhaher Well test Briefing Live Webcast, 4 July Wolfgang Zimmer, Paul Fink

Value focused Methodical delivery

Light Oil Exploration Williston Basin Saskatchewan, Canada. Corporate Presentation Q1 2015

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation

NATURAL REGIONS OF KENTUCKY

Preparing for the next wave of investment in oil and gas exploration. Robbert de Weijer, CEO. UGAS - Unconventional Gas Conference ASX:AJQ

The Debrosse Memorial Report 2014 Oil & Gas Activity in Ohio

Shale Gas Abundance or Mirage? Why The Marcellus Shale Will Disappoint Expectations

Carbonate Rock Formation

Natural Gas Prices To Crash Unless Rig Count Falls Fast

Runnels County, Texas

Deep Geothermal energy and groundwater in

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT LINC ENERGY ACQUIRES OIL PRODUCING ASSETS IN WYOMING, USA

May October Acquiring, Exploring and Developing Oil and Gas Projects in North and South America TSX.V: PTP

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 17 JUNE 2014

Fossil Energy Study Guide: Natural Gas

Institution of Oil and Gas Reservation in FDIC Owned Real Estate Sales. A White Paper by Linda Schweigert Dallas/DRR/ORE/OOA/Oil and Gas

Join Together With Demand:

Shadbush Environmental Justice Collective

Important Notice Disclaimer

NATIONAL FUEL REPORTS 2015 EARNINGS

Plate Tectonics: Ridges, Transform Faults and Subduction Zones

Issue. September 2012

Highlights of Testimony

PERSPECTIVE OF SHALE GAS PROSPECTION IN POLAND

Farm Planning FOR THE FUTURE: MINERAL LEASES

ASX Release. Romania Exploration Update. 2 October 2014

Effective Tax Rates of Oil and Gas Companies: Cashing in on Special Treatment

The Ohio Oil & Gas Association Overview of Ohio Oil & Natural Gas. American Association of Energy Engineers April 5, Cleveland, Oh

How Did These Ocean Features and Continental Margins Form?

GeoResources, Inc. Reports First Quarter Financial and Operational Results

Maximizing Production at Eagle Ford

Is Shale Gas In the Driver s Seat???? 3,000 TCF!!!!

2008 ANNUAL REPORT NORTh AmERicAN shale PLAys

Gulfport Energy Corporation (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

Unconventional oil and gas: outlook, risks, and potential

Texas American Resources, LLC

Update on ASTM s Proposed Standard Guide for Data Management and Reporting Associated with Oil and Gas Development Involving Hydraulic Fracturing

Assessment of Factors Influencing CO 2 Storage Capacity and Injectivity in Eastern U.S. Gas Shales

PRECIPITATION AND EVAPORATION

Geologic History Review

The Shale Gale Also Brings a Data Blizzard Author:

Understanding Tight Oil

Platts 3 rd Annual Midstream Development & Management Conference - Houston, Texas

PRIVATE EQUITY INSIGHTS

Hydrocarbon Production from the South Ellwood Field and the Effects on Naturally Occurring Oil and Gas Seeps*

SPACING Vertical Horizontal

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT JUNE 2015 QUARTERLY REPORT 31 JULY 2015

UPSTREAM OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY IN KENYA

Emerging Oil and Gas Development in Northwestern New Mexico HORIZONTAL GALLUP / MANCOS PLAY

The Impact of Marcellus Shale in Northeastern Pennsylvania with an Emphasis on Charities, Crime, and Poverty

Transamerica MLP & Energy Income

Treatment, Beneficial Use and Management of CBM Produced Water Industry Perspective

Collecting and Analyzing Big Data for O&G Exploration and Production Applications October 15, 2013 G&G Technology Seminar

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. TransCanada PipeLines Limited Volume 1: Application, Overview, Justification, and Commercial

2015 Annual General Meeting. 25 November 2015

29 May Eden signs Conditional Heads of Terms to Sell UK Gas and Petroleum Assets for 10million

A History and Overview of the Barnett Shale

Range Resources Announces Merger With Memorial Resource Development. Conference Call Slides

Oil & Gas Industry Recent Developments

I N T E R I M R E P O R T

Mike Hannah, Senate Finance Counsel Heather Fennell, Staff Attorney, Research Division NCGA Energy Policy Commission March 4,

AT A GLANCE. $17 billion $60 billion 42 million 6,000

NEW AMERICAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION STATEWIDE SURVEY ON ENERGY OHIO

For personal use only

National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program (NGGDPP).

PRESIDENT ENERGY PLC. ( President or the Company ) OIL DISCOVERY IN PARAGUAYAN CHACO

Analysis of Ohio Severance Tax Provisions of H.B. 487

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE NORTHSTAR #1 CLASS II INJECTION WELL AND THE SEISMIC EVENTS IN THE YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO AREA

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

Fossil Energy Study Guide: Oil

Nautilus Global Schedule 2016

GROWING WITH MEXICO IN A NEW ERA OF ENERGY REFORM

Transcription:

EMPIRE ENERGY GROUP LIMITED Level 7, 151 Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000 T: 02 9251 1846 F: 02 9251 0244 (ASX: EEG) 11 May 2011 ASX Announcement Market Update MARCELLUS & UTICA SHALES POSSIBLE AND PROSPECTIVE OIL & GAS RESERVES Over recent weeks the Company has been approached by a number of shareholders seeking clarification on Empire Energy s landing holding and possible reserves and prospective resources in New York and Pennsylvania States ( Region ). At present there is a hydraulic fracturing ( fracking ) moratorium in New York State. Several commentators have suggested this may be lifted in the short term. The rationale for lifting the moratorium being mainly related to the significant jobs and income (through severance taxes) that the shale oil and gas industry would bring to the State. The Company cannot make any further comment on the political position in New York State. Current Reserves and Resources In 2010 the Company had independent consultants and engineers review the Reserve and Resource Potential of all the Company s resources in the Region, in summary the prospective shales resources were: FORMATION Type Reserve P50 ML* Acres Actual Acres Actual Type*** BCF MMBbl calculated (Gross) Acres (Net) Marcellus Shale Gas Poss/Res 49.5 20,006 230,000 186,240 Marcellus Shale Oil Poss/Res 70.3 100,422 230,000 186,240 Utica Shale Gas Res 925.7 18,571 224,759 175,788 Theresa** Gas Poss/Res 75.6 16,691 Trenton** Gas Poss/Res 3.7 1,116 TOTAL 1,054.5 70.3 *Most likely on acreage specified at a 3% recovery factor ** The Theresa and Trenton Black River formations are not shales, but have been included due to prospectively. At current gas prices the Company is focusing on oil development programs. *** Poss = Possible; Res =Resource These reserves/resources are in addition to the 3P Reserves of 18MMBoe recently reported.

The Marcellus and Utica Shales How do Marcellus and Utica shale relate to the Company? To provide shareholders with an understanding of this potentially significant resource play, attached is a recent article summarising many of the questions asked about the resources in the region where the Company operates. The following map outlines the Company s leases in New York and Pennsylvania. In total, the Company holds around 3,800 leases in this region covering approximately 300,000 acres. The map above shows Empire Energy acreage (in yellow). This can be compared to the maps shown in the attached article. If shareholders have any questions relating to this announcement they may either contact the office on 02 9251 1846 or alternatively forward questions via email to info@empiregp.net. The information in this announcement which relates to the Company s reserves is based on information compiled by Ralph E Davis Associates Inc, Houston, Texas, a certified professional engineering group, with over 40 years experience. Neither Ralph E Davis Associates Inc, nor any of its employees have any interest in Empire Energy E&P, LLC or the properties reported herein.

UTICA SHALE THE NATURAL GAS GIANT BENEATH THE MARCELLUS? Adapted from article on www.geology.com Marcellus the Opening Act The Marcellus Shale captured public attention when leasing and drilling activities began pumping billions of dollars into local Appalachia economies and citizens began debating the environmental, social and economic impacts. All of this began suddenly in 2004 when Range Resources Corporation drilled the first Marcellus well using modern drilling technology. Now, just a few years later, the Marcellus Shale is being developed into one of the world's largest natural gas fields. However, what we are seeing today from the Marcellus is only the first step in a sequence of natural gas plays. The second step is starting in the Utica Shale. Where is the Utica Shale? The potential source rock portion of the Utica Shale is extensive. In the United States it underlies portions of Kentucky, Maryland, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, West Virginia and Virginia. It is also present beneath parts of Lake Ontario, Lake Erie and part of Ontario, Canada. This geographic extent of potential Utica Shale source rock is shown on the map labelled as Figure 1 below. If the Utica is commercial throughout this extent it will be geographically larger than any natural gas field known today. What is the Utica Shale? The Utica Shale is a rock unit located a few thousand feet below the Marcellus Shale. It also has the potential to become an enormous natural gas resource. The Utica Shale is thicker than the Marcellus, it is more geographically extensive and it has already proven its ability to support commercial production. It is impossible to say at this time how large the Utica Shale resource might be because it has not been thoroughly evaluated and little public information is available about its organic content, the thickness of organic-rich intervals and how it will respond to horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. However, the results of early testing indicate that the Utica Shale will be a very significant resource. Figure 1 This map was compiled by Geology.com using data provided by the Energy Information Administration [1], the USGS [2] and the Pennsylvania Geological Survey [3].

How Deep is the Utica Shale? The Utica Shale is deeper than the Marcellus. In some parts of Pennsylvania the Utica Shale can be over two miles below sea level. However, the depth of the Utica Shale decreases to the west into Ohio and to the northwest under the Great Lakes and into Canada. In these areas the Utica Shale rises to less than 2000 feet below sea level. Beyond the potential source rock areas the Utica Shale rises to Earth's surface and can be seen in outcrop. These depth relationships of the Utica Shale and the Marcellus Shale are shown in the generalized cross sections shown below as Figure 2. Figure 2 This cross-section was compiled by Geology.com using data provided by the EIA [1], the USGS [2], the Pennsylvania Geological Survey [3], and the USDE [4]. Most of the major rock units in the Appalachian Basin are thickest in the east and thin towards the west. The rock units that occur between the Marcellus Shale and the Utica Shale follow this trend. In central Pennsylvania, the Utica can be up to 7000 feet below the Marcellus Shale but that depth difference decreases to the west. In western New York State the Utica can be less than 3000 feet below the Marcellus. Current Development of the Utica Shale Gas Play In early 2011, most of the mineral rights leasing and drilling activity tied directly to the Utica Shale was in eastern Ohio and Ontario, Canada. In these areas the Utica Shale is less than 4000 feet below the surface and the Marcellus Shale is not present. (If the Marcellus is present it becomes the target because it is shallower, less expensive to drill and has a proven potential.) The generalized cross-section for the Utica and Marcellus Shale shown above as Figure 2 illustrates why the Utica is being developed in some parts of the Ohio and Canada instead of the Marcellus. It is not being developed in New York State due to the current hydraulic fracturing moratorium. Where Cross-Section 2 traverses the Pennsylvania-New York State boundary the Marcellus Shale is above the Utica and would be preferentially drilled because it is a shallower target. However, the productive portion of the Marcellus Shale does not extend into northern New York - but the Utica Shale does. In those areas the Utica Shale is less than one mile below the surface. In Ohio were the same situation occurs a few companies are leasing and drilling the Utica Shale for natural gas. Utica Shale Petrology and Stratigraphy The Utica Shale is an organic-rich calcareous black shale that was deposited about 440 to 460 million years ago during the Late Ordovician. It overlies the Trenton Limestone and is a few thousand feet below the Marcellus Shale (see the generalized stratigraphic column shown as Figure 5 in the right column of this page). The Utica Shale has a much higher carbonate content than the Marcellus Shale and a lower clay

mineral content. This difference in mineralogy produces a very different response to hydraulic fracturing treatments. The methods used in the Marcellus do not produce as much fracturing in the Utica. However, future research might be able to significantly improve the fracturing rate. (In Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale also has a high carbonate content. Drillers there have discovered ways to make the brittle carbonate zones fracture at a much higher rate than other gas shale rock units.) Thickness of the Utica Shale The thickness of the Utica Shale is variable. Throughout the potential source rock area it ranges in thickness from less than 100 feet to over 500 feet. Over the rock unit as a whole there is a general thinning from east to west. A thickness map of the Utica Shale is shown as Figure 3 below. Although thickness of a reservoir rock can be important, the organic content and presence of gas are what determines the true potential of a gas shale. Very little public information is available on the organic content of the Utica shale. Figure 3. This map was compiled by Geology.com using data provided by the EIA [1], the USGS [2] and the Pennsylvania Geological Survey [3]. Future Development of Utica Shale Two important challenges for developing the Utica Shale are its depth in the region were active Marcellus shale drilling is taking place and due to the New York State moratorium, and a lack of information. Much of the leasing activity in 2011 for the Utica has been, as might be expected, in Ontario and Quebec where the resource is quite accessible. However, the first commercial drilling is said to be in Pennsylvania (Butler County). Range Resources (RRC) drilled what it believes to be the pioneering commercial well in 2010 and plans more drilling in 2011. Consol Energy (CNX) drilled a discovery well in the Utica and will shift exploration resources to this play in 2011. Shell and Chevron (CVX) (via the acquisitions of East Energy and Atlas Energy respectively) are well positioned to be significant in the Utica. Chesapeake Energy (CHK) supposedly is building a land position in this play, most likely in Ohio. Private equity and MLP investors have also been briefed on the nascent Utica play and the response is said to be encouraging. It is worth recalling that the Marcellus excitement began just a few years ago with a small pioneering company, RRC. The resource potential was initially viewed as quite limited and neither the majors nor government agencies thought there was much commercial significance. Today the Marcellus is estimated to have a technically recoverable resource of over 250 trillion cubic feet (about a mid teens ultimate recovery rate). In a mere 6 years the play went from novelty to world class. It is this trajectory and record of success that inspires the half dozen or so companies that are now seriously investigating the Utica. If there is validation then one would expect the number of companies committing money, technology and management time to the Utica to jump significantly by end 2011.