Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels

Similar documents
Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas Norman L. Webb March 28, Reading (based on Wixson, 1999)

Alignment of Taxonomies

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Webb s Depth of Knowledge Guide

The Marzano Framework

HESS COGNITIVE RIGOR MATRIX (READING CRM):

Writing learning objectives

A New Lens for Examining Cognitive Rigor in Standards, Curriculum, & Assessments. for the transition to Common Core State Standards?

Exhibit memory of previously-learned materials by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers. Key Words

Cognitive Domain (Bloom)

Alignment, Depth of Knowledge, & Change Norman L. Webb Wisconsin Center for Education Research

Revised Bloom s Taxonomy

5. Formally register for INS299 for the number of semester hours indicated on your contract.

Bloom s Taxonomy. List the main characteristics of one of the main characters in a WANTED poster.

Language Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 5

Support Materials for Core Content for Assessment. Mathematics

Writing Student Learning Outcomes for an Academic Program

Degree- Level Expectations and Course Learning Outcomes

Accountable Talk Toolkit

CREATING LEARNING OUTCOMES

A Guide for Using Webb s Depth of Knowledge with Common Core State Standards

Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom-level Processes

parent ROADMAP SUPPORTING YOUR CHILD IN GRADE FIVE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

Students will know Vocabulary: claims evidence reasons relevant accurate phrases/clauses credible source (inc. oral) formal style clarify

MOUNTAIN VIEW COLLEGE CORE CURRICULUM EVALUATION COMMITTEE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES COURSE LEVEL VICTOR J. SOTO INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER PREPARED BY

Support Materials for Core Content for Assessment. Reading

TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (Excerpts from Linn and Miller Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 9 th ed)

Teaching Critical Thinking Skills to English for Academic Purposes Students

Language Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 6

Virginia English Standards of Learning Grade 8

A Teacher s Guide: Getting Acquainted with the 2014 GED Test The Eight-Week Program

3rd Grade Reading Standard Exceeds (4) Secure (3) Developing (2) Beginning (1)

TIPS FOR WRITING LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Resources for Writing Program Learning Outcomes

Units of Study 9th Grade

Higher order questions encourages higher order thinking Based on Bloom s Taxonomy

ESL I English as a Second Language I Curriculum

How To Write The English Language Learner Can Do Booklet

GRADE 11 English Language Arts Standards Pacing Guide. 1 st Nine Weeks

Expository Reading and Writing By Grade Level

Fairfield Public Schools

HSU Division of Enrollment Management and Student Affairs. Assessment Workbook

4 G: Identify, analyze, and synthesize relevant external resources to pose or solve problems. 4 D: Interpret results in the context of a situation.

AIE: 85-86, 193, , 294, , , 412, , , 682, SE: : 339, 434, , , , 680, 686

Students will know Vocabulary: purpose details reasons phrases conclusion point of view persuasive evaluate

SIXTH GRADE UNIT 1. Reading: Literature

Five High Order Thinking Skills

Common Core State Standards Speaking and Listening

KINDGERGARTEN. Listen to a story for a particular reason

Qualification Specification

Grade 4 Writing Curriculum Map

Writing Learning Objectives

Performance Development and Review Template Guide

Indiana Statewide Transfer General Education Core

Industrial Engineering Definition of Tuning

Writing Goals and Objectives If you re not sure where you are going, you re liable to end up some place else. ~ Robert Mager, 1997

HIV, STD & Pregnancy Prevention

Alignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages with the Common Core State Standards

Introduction to Reading Literacy Strategies

Position Classification Standard for Management and Program Clerical and Assistance Series, GS-0344

Writing Emphasis by Grade Level Based on State Standards. K 5.1 Draw pictures and write words for specific reasons.

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN THE MAJOR A PRIMER FOR DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT LIAISONS

Goals AND Objectives should be student-centered rather than course-centered Goals AND Objectives should reflect successful student performance

LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR

HIGH SCHOOL MASS MEDIA AND MEDIA LITERACY STANDARDS

Mortgage Broker Qualifying Standards (MBQS)

Common Core State Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects, Grades 9-10

NWEA EXTERNAL FAQ. MAP Science for use with Next Generation Science Standards

Grade 1 LA Subject Grade Strand Standard Benchmark. Florida K-12 Reading and Language Arts Standards 27

Mathematics Cognitive Domains Framework: TIMSS 2003 Developmental Project Fourth and Eighth Grades

Writing and Presenting a Persuasive Paper Grade Nine

Brought to you by the NVCC-Annandale Reading and Writing Center

Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening June 1, 2009 FINAL Elementary Standards Grades 3-8

Core Curriculum Course Proposal Cover Sheet

Indiana University East Faculty Senate

PROGRAM CONCENTRATION:

Purposes and Processes of Reading Comprehension

Reading and Viewing Achievement Standards

LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition, Levels A C, correlated to the South Carolina College and Career Readiness Standards, Grades 3 5

Common Core Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects

Standards for Mathematical Practice: Commentary and Elaborations for 6 8

In mathematics, there are four attainment targets: using and applying mathematics; number and algebra; shape, space and measures, and handling data.

Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening

Lesson Title: Argumentative Writing (Writing a Critical Review)

Content Standards 5.0 Numbers and Operations Standard Statement Number Sense Operations on Numbers Estimation...

Grade 3 Question Stem Bank: Common Core State Standards

6 Week Strategic Onboarding Program:

Curriculum Development. Workbook

Grade 5. Ontario Provincial Curriculum-based Expectations Guideline Walking with Miskwaadesi and Walking with A`nó:wara By Subject/Strand

Grade Level: 2 nd Grade

Focus: Reading Unit of Study: Fiction/Expository/Persuasive/Research/Media Literacy

Mathematics B (2008) Sample assessment instrument and student responses

English Language Proficiency Standards: At A Glance February 19, 2014

Minnesota K-12 Academic Standards in Language Arts Curriculum and Assessment Alignment Form Rewards Intermediate Grades 4-6

Reading Standards for Literature

Second Language Acquisition Stages Stephen Krashen (1986) Silent and Receptive Stage

Writing Educational Goals and Objectives

Guide to Writing a Project Report

Transcription:

Depth of Knowledge (DOK) s Draw Identify List Define Label Memorize Calculate Illustrate Arrange Who, What, When, Where, Why Measure State Name Repeat Tabulate Report Infer Tell Use Design Recall Recognize Quote Categorize Connect Recite Match Collect and Display Identify Patterns Synthesize One Graph Organize (Recall) Classify Construct Describe Separate Apply Concepts Modify Four Explain Two Cause/Effect (Extended Interpret (Skill/ Predict Critique Estimate Thinking) Concept) Compare Interpret Analyze Relate Distinguish Three (Strategic Thinking) Use Context Cues Create Revise Assess Make Observations Develop a Logical Argument Prove Apprise Construct Summarize Use Concepts to Solve Non-Routine Problems Show Critique Compare Explain Phenomena in Terms of Concepts Formulate Hypothesize Draw Conclusions Investigate Differentiate Cite Evidence One Activities Recall elements and details of story structure, such as sequence of events, character, plot and setting. Conduct basic mathematical calculations. Label locations on a map. Represent in words or diagrams a scientific concept or relationship. Perform routine procedures like measuring length or using punctuation marks correctly. Describe the features of a place or people. Two Activities Identify and summarize the major events in a narrative. Use context cues to identify the meaning of unfamiliar words. Solve routine multiple-step problems. Describe the cause/effect of a particular event. Identify patterns in events or behavior. Formulate a routine problem given data and conditions. Organize, represent and interpret data. Three Activities Support ideas with details and examples. Use voice appropriate to the purpose and audience. Identify research questions and design investigations for a scientific problem. Develop a scientific model for a complex situation. Determine the author s purpose and describe how it affects the interpretation of a reading selection. Apply a concept in other contexts. Four Activities Conduct a project that requires specifying a problem, designing and conducting an experiment, analyzing its data, and reporting results/ solutions. Apply mathematical model to illuminate a problem or situation. Analyze and synthesize information from multiple sources. Describe and illustrate how common themes are found across texts from different cultures. Design a mathematical model to inform and solve a practical or abstract situation. Webb, Norman L. and others. Web Alignment Tool 24 July 2005. Wisconsin Center of Educational Research. University of Wisconsin-Madison. 2 Feb. 2006. <http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/wat/index.aspx>.

DOK Question Stems DOK 1 Can you recall? When did happen? Who was? How can you recognize? What is? How can you find the meaning of? Can you recall? Can you select? How would you write? What might you include on a list about? Who discovered? What is the formula for? Can you identify? How would you describe? DOK 3 How is related to? What conclusions can you draw? How would you adapt to create a different? How would you test? Can you predict the outcome if? What is the best answer? Why? What conclusion can be drawn from these three texts? What is your interpretation of this text? Support your rationale. How would you describe the sequence of? What facts would you select to support? Can you elaborate on the reason? What would happen if? Can you formulate a theory for? How would you test? Can you elaborate on the reason? DOK 2 Can you explain how affected? How would you apply what you learned to develop? How would you compare? Contrast? How would you classify? How are alike? Different? How would you classify the type of? What can you say about? How would you summarize? How would you summarize? What steps are needed to edit? When would you use an outline to? How would you estimate? How could you organize? What would you use to classify? What do you notice about? DOK 4 Write a thesis, drawing conclusions from multiple sources. Design and conduct an experiment. Gather information to develop alternative explanations for the results of an experiment. Write a research paper on a topic. Apply information from one text to another text to develop a persuasive argument. What information can you gather to support your idea about? DOK 4 would most likely be the writing of a research paper or applying information from one text to another text to develop a persuasive argument. DOK 4 requires time for extended thinking. From Depth of Knowledge Descriptors, Examples and Question Stems for Increasing Depth of Knowledge in the Classroom Developed by Dr. Norman Webb and Flip Chart developed by Myra Collins

Depth of Knowledge 3 Students provide support for reasoning, apply complex and abstract thinking, and make decisions. What makes better than/superior to? Explain or connect ideas using supporting evidence to. Analyze/synthesize information within one data source or text. What is the recurring theme in? Provide supporting details. Support your rationale. Evaluate and provide rationale. Verify the reasonableness of. What is your interpretation of? Cite evidence and develop a logical argument for. How is related to? How would you adapt to? How would your test? What would happen if? Strategic thinking DOK 3 requires higher cognitive demands than the previous levels. Students explain/justify thinking and provide supporting evidence for reasoning or conclusions drawn. 3 tasks typically require reasoning, complexity, developing a plan or sequence of steps, and have more than one possible response or solution. Depth of Knowledge 4 Students make connections, related ideas within the content or among content areas, and devise one approach among alternatives on how a situation can be solved. Investigate and draw conclusions about how impacts the world today. How would you adapt to create that would be applicable in the real world? Analyze and explain multiple perspectives/issues within or across time periods, events, or cultures. Analyze how similar themes or ideas are developed in multiple texts. Evaluate for real-world occurrence. Design to improve. Justify your choice. Gather, organize, and interpret information from multiple sources. Write a research report. Extended thinking DOK 4 requires complex reasoning and time to research, plan, and problem solve, and think. Tasks involve investigation or application to the real world and include none-routine manipulations or connections with and across discipline, content areas, and multiple sources. Students select one approach among many alternatives. Tasks usually occur over an extended period of time *From Dept-of knowledge s for Four Content Areas by Webb, N.

Revised Bloom s Taxonomy 4 Apply The student makes use of information in a context different from the one in which it was learned. Which other way would you choose to? Use other attributes/characteristics to group/sort. Explain another situation where. Which factors would you change if? What questions would you ask of? Which actions would you take if? What would the result be if? Why does Work? Apply (level 4) Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation Carrying out Executing Implementing Using Revised Bloom s Taxonomy 5 Analyze The student breaks learned information into parts to explore understandings and relationships. Determine if the information is based on fact or opinion. Explain what must have happened when. What conclusions can you draw? Which events could not have happed? What is similar to or different from? What is the motive/underlying them/message? What are other possible outcomes? Distinguish between. What is the relationship? Analyze (level 5) Break down a concept or idea into parts and determine the relationships among the parts. Differentiation Discrimination Distinguishing Finding Coherence Focusing Integrating Attributing Deconstruction Outlining Organizing Revised Bloom s Taxonomy 6 Create The student creates new ideas, products, or viewpoints from previously learned information. What changes could you make to revise? What theory can you propose for? Develop a plan/proposal that? What might be a solution to? How many ways can you? How could you improve? Devise your own way to. What might happen if? Generate hypotheses. What are the alternatives? Design a to. Create ( 6) Combine elements or ideas to form a whole; reorganized elements or ideas into new patterns or structures. Construction Hypothesizing Designing Planning Generating Producing *From Dept-of knowledge s for Four Content Areas by Webb, N.

Making Connections Grades 6-12