AASHTO Pavement Thickness Design Guide

Similar documents
Final Report Evaluation of I-Pave Low Volume Road Design Software

The AASHO Road Test site (which eventually became part of I-80) at Ottawa, Illinois, was typical of northern climates (see Table 1).

SECTION PAVEMENT DESIGN

PAVEMENT STRUCTURE DESIGN GUIDELINES

INTRODUCTION TO CONCRETE PAVEMENTS

Pavement Thickness. esign and RCC-Pave Software. Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavement: Design and Construction. October 24, 2006 Atlanta, Georgia

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF WASHOE COUNTY

Lecture Notes CT 4860 Structural Pavement Design. Design of Flexible Pavements

Technical Presentation: Follow up on HVS testing of Roller Compacted Concrete and Ultra-thin reinforced concrete test sections

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

Chapter 7: Pavement Rehabilitation 7-1 Asphalt Pavement Overlays 7-1 Surface Preparation Methods 7-2 Concrete Pavement Preparation 7-3 Recycling

La Nueva AASHTO Guia de Diseno de Pavimentos Hormigon

Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements. The Stormwater Problem

Rehabilitation for Concrete Pavements

SECTION 311 PLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF CEMENT TREATED SUBGRADESOIL CEMENT BASE COURSE

RMS Guide for design of concrete pavements in areas of settlement. Version 1.0. Roads and Maritime Services

Software Development (PAKPAVE) for Flexible Pavement Design

Construction Specifications for Keyhole Pavement Coring and Reinstatement

Installation PowerPoint for Grasscrete Formers

AGREGADOS RECICLADOS MITOS Y REALIDADES

Guidelines for Durable Driveways, Carports Patios, Walks, Garage Floors

Impacts of Increased Loading Due to Heavy Construction Traffic on Thin Pavements

SELECTING REHABILITATION STRATEGIES FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS IN TEXAS. Andrew J. Wimsatt, Ph.D., P.E. Fort Worth District Pavement Engineer

CID STREET INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT

Pavement Rehabilitation Using Hot Mix Asphalt. - National Perspective -

The full range of Kilsaran products are manufactured to fully meet all requirements of all current British and European Standards.

OHIO ASPHALT PAVING CONFERENCE

Structural/Hydrologic Design & Maintenance of Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

1.5 Concrete (Part I)

CHAPTERS PAVEMENT ENGINEERING CHAPTER 600 GENERAL ASPECTS

CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROAD CONSTRUCTION. Pavement Base Reinforcement Subgrade Stabilization

SECTION 55 PIPE FOR STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS (FAA D-701)

PAVEMENT REHABILITATION using BITUMEN STABILISATION STATE OF THE ART

Reinforcement HUESKER. HaTelit. Engineering with geosynthetics

Quality Assurance Concepts. Outline

Use of Marginal Materials & Fly ash in Road Works

Porous Pavement Alternatives Cost Analysis

Pavement Rehabilitation Selection Rehabilitation Techniques

Aggregates for Path Construction

C. Section TESTING LABORATORY SERVICE.

FWD/HWD Void Detection Beneath Concrete Pavements or Overlaid Concrete Pavements. SWIFT 2010 Calgary, AB

Cementitious Stabilization

asphalt applications Construction and surfacing of footways and cycleways using asphalt mpa asphalt Asphalt Information Service

LIFE-CYCLE COST COMPARISON FOR MUNICIPAL ROAD PAVEMENTS

Guide for Design and Construction of New Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements (JPCPs)

Lab 1 Concrete Proportioning, Mixing, and Testing

Pavement Design. Guest Lecturer Dr. Sirous Alavi, P.E. SIERRA TRANSPORTATION Terminal Way, Suite 125 Reno, Nevada 89502

Fly Ash Slurry Injection (FASI) of Bituminous Thermal Cracks

Expected Service Life and Performance Characteristics of HMA Pavements in LTPP

July 2005 Technical Memorandum: UCPRC-TM Authors: D. Jones and J. Harvey PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:

Using Accelerated Pavement Testing to Evaluate Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement Performance

CHAPTER 7 ASPHALT PAVEMENTS

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

INDEX DESCRIPTION MATERIALS APPROVAL OF SUBBASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION MEASUREMENT PAYMENT 6

Performance of Edge Drains in Concrete Pavements in California

PROPERTIES AND MIX DESIGNATIONS

Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

Session 7: Retrofitted Edge Drains 7.1

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (1995 MasterFormat Section 02795)

Rehabilitation by cracking and seating of concrete pavement optimized by FWD analysis

Asphalt Pavement Association Of Michigan Selecting the Right Mix Atrium Drive, Suite 202 Okemos, MI

Design of Rigid and Flexible Pavements by Various Methods & Their Cost Analysis of Each Method

Quality Assurance Program. June by Texas Department of Transportation (512) all rights reserved

Modern Techniques for Concrete Pavement Design

Construction Specification for Concrete Curb and Concrete Curb and Gutter

SD95-16-G2. SD Department of Transportation Office of Research. Rural Road Design, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation Guide

Design and Construction of Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavements for Container Terminals. David R. Luhr PhD PE *

PVC PIPE PERFORMANCE FACTORS

Stabilization of Soil with Self-Cementing Coal Ashes

Application of the Endurance Limit Premise in Mechanistic-Empirical Based Pavement Design Procedures

Engineering Road Note 9 May 2012

AASHTO Subcomittee on Materials Biloxi, Mississippi August 4-10, 2012 Chris Abadie, P.E.

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

A perforated conduit such as pipe, tubing or tile installed beneath the ground to intercept and convey ground water. or structures.

APPENDIX B. I. Background Information

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

T2: Reduce overall transport cost by cost effective road rehabilitation and maintenance

Supplement to Part 2: Pavement Structural Design of the Austroads Guide to Pavement Technology

TAC Primer Pavement Asset Design and Management

700 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION & RIGHT-OF OF-WAY PERMIT

Rehabilitation Strategies for Highway Pavements

Fire and Concrete Structures

2011 NACE Conference by. Ken Skorseth SDLTAP Program Manager

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON THE USE OF WATERPROOFING MEMBRANES ON CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS

Rehabilitation Strategies for Bonded Concrete Overlays of Asphalt Pavements

Software Development for the AASHTO and ERA Flexible Pavement Design Methods

Interlocking Concrete Pavement as an Alternative to Asphalt Concrete for Howard Road, Westley, California

Design and Construction of a Pavement for Tracked Military Vehicles

Road Pavement Design Guide July 2000

DESIGN OF CONTAINER YARD AT PORT OF BALBOA. Houston, TX 77077; PH (281) ;

Nevada DOT Cold In-Place Recycling Federal Highway Administration National Review Close out meeting, August 25, 2005

Advancements in Permeable Pavements

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT

Standards for Specifying Construction Of Airports

EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF LIME STABILIZED SOILS AND AGGREGATES VOLUME 3: MIXTURE DESIGN AND TESTING PROCEDURE FOR LIME STABILIZED SOILS

Transcription:

AASHTO Pavement Thickness Design Guide When designing pavement thickness for flexible and rigid pavements, the following considerations should be used. 1. Performance criteria (serviceability indexes). Condition of pavements are rated with a present serviceability index (PSI) ranging from 5 (perfect condition) to 0 (impossible to travel). a. Initial serviceability index (Po) Po is considered to be that PSI immediately after the pavement is open. AASHTO values are 4.5 for rigid pavement and 4.2 for flexible pavement. b. Terminal serviceability index (Pt) Pt is considered to be that PSI that represents the lowest acceptable level before resurfacing or reconstruction becomes necessary. Pt = 2.00 for Secondary Roads, Local Residential Streets. Pt = 2.25 for Minor Collectors, Industrial and Commercial Streets. Pt = 2.50 for Major Collectors and all Arterials. c. Serviceability loss (dpsi) dpsi is the difference between Po and Pt (Po Pt). The dpsi is the basis for the pavement design. 2. Design variables a. Analysis period (n) n is the period of time for which the analysis is to be conducted. Normally 50 years for concrete and 30 years for asphalt. b. Design Traffic (ESALs) ESALs is the estimate of number of Equivalent 18 kip Single Axle Loads (ESALs) during the analysis period is required. This value can be estimated based on: The Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) in the base year The average percentage of trucks expected to use the road The average annual traffic growth rate, and The analysis period To estimate the design ESALs, the following procedure may be used. 1.) Obtain an estimate of the design AADT for the beginning, or base year of the analysis period. 2.) Obtain an estimate of the average percentage of the AADT that will be trucks. 3.) Calculate the ESALs for the base year. 4.) Calculate the growth factor based on the annual traffic growth rate (r %) and the analysis period (n). Growth Factor = (((1+r)^n) 1)/r 5.) Multiply the base year ESALs by the Growth Factor to obtain the total ESALs for the analysis period. 1

c. Reliability (R %)/ Normal Deviation (ZR) R is the probability that the design will succed for the life of the pavement. The following reliability and normal deviation (ZR) values are recommended. Local Streets: R = 80%, ZR = 0.841 Collector Streets: R = 88%, ZR = 1.270 Arterial Streets: R = 95%, ZR = 1.645 d. Overall standard deviation (So) So is the coefficient which describes how well the AASHTO Road Test data fits the AASHTO Design Equations. The lower the overall deviation, the better the equations model the data. The following ranges are recommended. Rigid Pavements: 0.30 to 0.40 Flexible Pavements: 0.40 to 0.50 3. Material properties for structural design a. Roadbed soil resilient modulus (MR) MR is the property of the soil which indicates the stiffness or elasticity of the soil under dynamic loading. MR is also adjusted for seasonal fluctuation from temperature etc. b. Modulus of subgrade reaction (k and kc) k is the modulus of the subgrade soil. c. Approximate relationship of k to MR: k=mr/19.4 d. Composite modulus of subgrade reaction (kc) kc is the composite modulus of the subbase materials, which will take into account any base placed on top of the subgrade. If a base is used kc is input into the equation rather than k. Type of Soil Silts and clays of high compressibility ( liquid limit >= 50), natural density (not recommended for subgrades without treatment) Fine grain soils in which silt and clay size particles predominate (low compressibility, liquid limit < 50) Poorly grades sands and soils that are predominately sandy with moderate amounts of silts and clays (well drained) Gravely soils, well graded sands, and sand gravel mixtures relatively free of plastic fines Subgrade Strength K Value Range (pci) (Rigid Pavement) Resilient Modulus MR, (psi) (Flexible Pavement CBR Very Low 50 100 1000 2700 3 or less Low 100 150 2700 4000 3 to 5.5 Medium 150 220 4000 5700 5.5 to 12 High 220 250+ >5700 >12 2

Approximate composite modulus of subgrade reaction (kc) for various pavement conditions. Subgrade k Value Untreated Subbase Depth vs kc, pci, (LS=1) 50 27 31 34 37 100 43 47 51 56 150 57 62 66 71 200 70 74 78 85 Crushed stone use k = 100 and kc = 150 for 6 to 12 in of thickness. Subgrade k Value Bituminous Subbase Depth vs kc, pci, (LS=0) 50 84 112 141 170 100 144 198 243 288 150 221 277 334 392 200 284 351 419 487 Subgrade k Value Cement Treated Subbase Depth vs kc, pci, (LS=0) 50 101 145 193 245 100 185 258 334 414 150 265 360 460 563 200 341 457 577 700 Subgrade k Value Lean Concrete Subbase Depth vs kc, pci, (LS=1) 50 104 156 205 262 100 192 271 354 443 150 274 378 488 603 200 353 480 612 750 e. Concrete properties Modulus of Elasticity (Ec) and Modulus of Rupture (S c). S c is the 28 day Flexural Strength of the concrete. Ec can be derived from S c as follows Ec = 5700(S c). Flexural Strength (S c) can also be approximated from compressive strength (fc) as follows: S c = 2.3fc^0.667(psi). f. Layer coefficients. Structural layer coefficients (ai) are required for flexible pavement design. A value for these coefficients is assigned to each layer material in the pavement structure in order to convert actual layer thickness into structural number (SN). Component Coefficient Minimum Thickness Surface/Intermediate Course Hot Mix Asphalt with Type A Aggregate 0.44 2 Hot Mix Asphalt with Type B Aggregate 0.40 2 Base Course 3

Type B Hot Mix Asphalt 0.40 2 Asphalt Treated Base Class I 0.34 4 Bituminous Treated Aggregate Base 0.23 6 Asphalt Treated Base Class II 0.26 4 Cold Laid Bituminous Concrete Base 0.23 6 Cement Treated Granular (Aggregate) Base 0.20 6 Soil Cement Base 0.15 6 Crushed (Graded) Stone Base 0.14 6 Macadam Stone Base 0.12 6 Portland Cement Concrete Base (New) 0.50 Old Portland Cement Concrete 0.40 Crack and Seated PCC 0.25 0.30 Rubblized PCC 0.20 Cold in Place Recycled 0.22 0.27 Subbase Course Soil Cement Subbase 0.10 6 Soil Lime Subbase 0.10 6 Granular Subbase 0.10 4 Soil Aggregate Subbase 0.05 4 4. Pavement structural characteristics a. Coefficient of drainage (Cd or Mi) Cd is the coefficient of drainage for rigid pavement design used to account for improved or decreased quality of drainage. Mi is the coefficient of drainage for flexible pavement design used to modify layer coefficients. Water under pavement is one of the primary causes of pavement failure. This will contribute to pavement pumping under large numbers of heavy loads. The following definitions are used as a guide: Excellent drainage Material drained to 50% of saturation in 2 hours. Good drainage Material drained to 50% of saturation in 1 day. Fair drainage Material drained to 50% of saturation in 7 days. Poor drainage Material drained to 50% of saturation in 1 month. Very poor drainage Material does not drain. Based on these definitions the Cd or Mi value for Fair drainage would be 1.00. A value of 1.00 would have no impact on pavement thickness. Lower values increase the required pavement thickness; higher values decrease the required pavement thickness. Recommended values of Cd for rigid pavement Percent of Time Pavement structure is exposed to moisture levels approaching saturation Quality of Drainage < 1% 1 5% 5 25% >25% Excellent 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.10 1.10 4

Good 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 Fair 1.15 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Poor 1.10 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 Very Poor 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.70 Recommended values of Mi for modifying structural layer coefficients of untreated base and subbase materials in flexible pavements Percent of Time Pavement structure is exposed to moisture levels approaching saturation Quality of Drainage < 1% 1 5% 5 25% >25% Excellent 1.40 1.35 1.35 1.30 1.30 1.20 1.20 Good 1.35 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.00 1.00 Fair 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.05 1.00 0.80 0.80 Poor 1.15 1.05 1.05 0.80 0.80 0.60 0.60 Very Poor 1.05 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.75 0.40 0.40 b. Load transfer coefficients for jointed and continuous reinforced pavements. The one item which distinguishes concrete pavement, is the type of joint used to control cracking and whether or not steel dowels are used in the joint for load transfer. Each design provides a different level of transfer of load from one side of pavement joint to the other. To adjust projected pavement performance for various designs, the load transfer coefficient (J) is used. Load Transfer coefficients (J) for typical designs E 18 s Millions Doweled & Mesh Aggregate Interlock Edge Support Continuous Reinforcement No Yes No Yes No Yes Up to 0.3 3.2 2.7 3.2 2.8 Local Streets/Roads 0.3 to 1 3.2 2.7 3.4 3.0 Local Streets/Roads 1 to 3 3.2 2.7 3.6 3.1 Local Streets/Roads 3 to 10 3.2 2.7 3.8 3.2 2.9 2.5 Arterials/Highways 10 to 30 3.2 2.7 4.1 3.4 3.0 2.6 Arterials/Highways Over 30 3.2 2.7 4.3 3.6 3.1 2.6 Arterials/Highways c. Loss of support factor (LS) LS is included in the design of rigid pavements to account for the potential loss of support arising from subbase erosion and/or differential vertical soil movement. Class Typical ranges of LS for various types of base materials. Type of Material Loss of Support (LS) Cement Treated Granular Base 0.0 1.0 (E=1,000,000 to 2,000,000 psi) Cement Aggregate Mixtures 0.0 1.0 5

(E=500,000 to 1,000,000 psi) Asphalt Treated Base (E=350,000 to 1,000,000 psi) Bituminous Stabilized Mixtures (E=40,000 to 300,000 psi) Lime Stabilized (E=20,000 to 70,000 psi) Unbound Granular Materials (E=15,000 to 45,000 psi) Fine Grained or Natural Subgrade Materials (E=3,000 to 40,000 psi) 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 5. Pavement Reinforcement a. General. There are two types of reinforced rigid pavements. Jointed Reinforced Concrete Pavement (JRCP) and Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP). The major difference is that JRCP has joints and CRCP does not. b. JRCP 1) Slab length (L) distance between transverse joints. 2) Steel working stress (fc) typically a value equivalent to 75% of the steel yield strength is used for working stress. For Grade 40 and Grade 60 steel, the fc would be 30,000 psi and 45,000 psi, respectively. 3) Friction factor (F) F accounts for the frictional resistance between the bottom of the slab and the top of the underlying subbase or subgrade layer and is basically equivalent to a coefficient of friction. Recommended friction factors (F) Type of Material Beneath Slab Friction Factor (F) Surface Treatment 2.2 Lime Stabilization 1.8 Asphalt Stabilization 1.8 Cement Stabilization 1.8 River Gravel 1.5 Crushed Stone 1.5 Sandstone 1.2 Natural Subgrade Materials 0.9 6