The New New York Bridge Project Support Materials for TIFIA Financing Request

Similar documents
EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00AM ET, WEDNESDAY, May 14, THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00AM ET, WEDNESDAY, May 14, 2014

STATEMENT OF PETER M. ROGOFF ACTING UNDER SECRETARY FOR POLICY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Analysis of the Obama Administration s FY 2017 Budget Proposal for Transportation

Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 Madison, WI (608) Fax: (608)

Appendix A Alternative Contracting General Engineering Consultant RFP. Appendix A

EDUCATION SUMMARY Hillary Clinton

Improving and Streamlining the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program

DOUGLAS COUNTY RESOLUTION NO CITY OF LAWRENCE RESOLUTION NO. 5094

Technical Report Documentation Page. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/

18.1 million people 1 billion tons of goods moved 2.5 billion dollars of trucking congestion costs

Dallas-Fort Worth Area Major Transportation Projects

WORLD BANK WORLD BANK

Connecticut s Bold Vision for a Transportation Future

Borrowing Money for Your Business

FloridaNOTAllAboard RESOLUTION NO

Cost and Financial Analysis

MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Debt Issuance and Management Policy June 20, 2016

WORK ZONE SAFETY & MOBILITY GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

Appendix E Transportation System and Demand Management Programs, and Emerging Technologies

Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding

Public Works Financing

Appendix 4 Eastside Corridor Express Toll Lanes Financial Feasibility Analysis

Review of Arkansas Unemployment Insurance By Kenny Hall, Executive Vice President Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce/Associated Industries of Arkansas

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Summary of MAP-21 Matrix

CRENSHAW/LAX TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE AND TRANSPORTATION HEARING ON THE FUTURE OF INTERCITY RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE AND AMTRAK

Arizona State Transportation Board Policies

Developing a Public-Private Partnership Framework: Policies and PPP Units

Analysis of the 2015 Senate Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The DRIVE Act

Debt Management Policy

PROJECT CHANGE REQUEST

Senate Bill No CHAPTER 25

Section I. Introduction

Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION FEDERALISM POLICY STATEMENT

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

The FOS Approach Mortgagee sales

Office of Capital Facilities

MANAGEMENT PLAN. Fiscal Year

West Virginia Housing Development Fund. Debt Management Policy

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

New York State Legislation Supporting Safe Routes to School and Healthy Infrastructure

German Aspects of Acquisition Financing

The Real Estate Acquisition Process Brochure

12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Project Financial Plan 2014 Update

Why NEC FUTURE? 457 MILES LONG 2,200 DAILY TRAINS 750,000 DAILY PASSENGERS. Study Partners. Key Needs

HIGHWAYS ENGLAND STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN OVERVIEW

Associated Students of the University of California, Merced Resolution #14. Resolution in Support of the California High-Speed Rail Project

Cost-Benefit Analysis. 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley

Understanding Value Capture as a Transportation Finance Strategy in Massachusetts. March 15, 2013

North American Development Bank. Bid Evaluation Procedures

NEW YORK S TOP TRANSPORTATION ISSUES:

ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION AR: 6.03 DATE APPROVED September 10, 2002 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT:

Annual Meeting of Senior PPP Officials 2010

Chapter 5 Financial Plan

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION

Airport Max: A Case Study

GAO U.S. INFRASTRUCTURE. Funding Trends and Federal Agencies Investment Estimates. Testimony

Northern Middlesex Council of Governments

Risk Management in the Development of a Penta-P Project

The Budget: The Governor s Proposition 2 Debt Proposal

Connecticut s Bold Vision for a Transportation Future

TAPPAN ZEE HUDSON RIVER CROSSING PROJECT

Central Bank of Iraq. Press Communiqué

AASHTO First Take at the New Surface Transportation Bill FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT December 2, 2015

Rockland County. MSW Program in

Preliminary Value for Money Analysis

HRTAC Regional Financial Planning. October 29, 2015

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2015)

It Is In Your Interest

Financial Analysis and Funding

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

Cool Counties Policies and Programs Template

MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

RBRC Combo Project Request for Qualifications Additional Information and Clarifications #1. RFQ No Issued: March 9, 2011

E2SHB S COMM AMD By Committee on Energy, Environment & Telecommunications

GENERAL. This manual addresses five local programs that are funded under the current Highway Act:

West Virginia Housing Development Fund. Debt Management Policy

Study of Transportation Long-Range Funding Solutions. Report to the Legislature

WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

BLENDING FUNDING IN SUPPORT OF TOLL PROJECTS. Marcus Coronado, P. E. PPP Project Manager Strategic Projects Division

P3 Value for Money Assessment and Project Report. Evan Thomas Water and Wastewater Treatment Facility Project

United States House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Subcommittee on Highways and Transit

Principles for Authorization of the Surface Transportation Program

Inquiry into Access of Small Business to Finance

PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS & OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALL BUSINESS IN VIRGINIA PRESENTATION TO THE 2010 SMALL BUSINESS SUMMIT

Section ALTERNATIVES. 3. Alternatives

Request for Proposals For Financial Advisor Services

Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program. Ohio Department of Transportation

Decision-Making Structure and Process

Public-Private Partnerships Forum PPP Law, Structures and Contracting

PROCUREMENT GUIDE: CHP FINANCING

Virginia s Public- Private Partnership Approach. Barbara W. Reese, Summer/Fall 2006

Final NPS Alternative Transportation Program Strategic Action Plan,

Regional Surface Transportation Program Policy and Allocation

Alternatives Evaluation Overview

Performance Measurement for the better utilisation of New Zealand s existing Transport Network

Transcription:

The New New York Bridge Project Support Materials for TIFIA Financing Request 1

Every Day and Every Dollar Count To replace the Tappan Zee Bridge, New York s new Design-Build project delivery approach is historic: Open and transparent process Concurrent environmental review and procurement Aggressive, consolidated schedule Cost savings, price certainty and risk sharing Close collaboration with local, state and federal agencies Cooperation from labor Rigorous community outreach and planning Supporting the New New York Bridge will provide a model project for cities and states nationwide 2

Project Schedule Why now, why this project? Designated as a High-Priority Project by President Obama Largest of 3 accelerated TIFIA highway bridge projects in the US The Project s aggressive consolidated schedule addresses 4 components simultaneously: Accelerated EIS Process Design-Build Procurement Process Project Labor Agreement Project Financial Plan 3

Project Schedule The Project s aggressive consolidated schedule can serve as a best practice for cities and states nationwide: 2011 2012 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D ACCELERATED EIS Draft EIS 1/12 Final EIS 8/12 ROD 9/12 PROCUREMENT A new approach to project delivery: Addressing the EIS, Procurement, PLA, and Financial Plan in tandem Release RFQ 11/11 PLA Release RFP 3/12 Shortlisted Proposers 2/12 Negotiations Begin 2/12 PLA Complete 7/12 Proposals Due 7/12 Select Preferred Bidder 10/12 FINANCIAL PLAN Draft FP 12/11 Initiate TIFIA Application 8/12 4

Procurement Governor Cuomo signed Design-Build legislation into law in 2011, to foster creativity and innovation and help control costs Transparent, open Design-Build procurement has attracted world-class professional talent: Kiewit-Skanska-Weeks Bechtel-Tutor Perini Fluor-American Bridge-Granite-Traylor Brothers Proposals under final review Award in October 2012 Smart Early Work, Project Labor Agreement and competitive procurement likely to result in Project cost lower than the $5.4 billion estimated by FHWA Procurement process secured and verified by an independent auditor TIFIA loan is an important component of financing plan 5

Project Labor Agreement Partnering with 14 construction unions including 26 locals yielded a PLA with $452 million in project savings, including: 10 hour workdays Apprenticeship and training requirements Lower shift differentials Alternative Dispute Resolution for Worker s Compensation Early arrival benefits No-strike provision Sets a new national precedent for PLAs 6

The New NYS Thruway Authority Governor Cuomo appointed a new Board Chairman and management, who have taken actions to stabilize finances and advance the New New York Bridge The new Thruway Authority has: Enhanced transparency, in tandem with the Governor's new approach to governing Refinanced potentially risky short-term debt Right-sized Capital Program and deployed smart asset management systems Reduced expenses by streamlining operations Addressed high personnel and benefit costs 7

The Need Outdated and Overcrowded Built to last 50 years, opened in 1955 138,000+ vehicles cross the bridge daily 40% more than it was designed to handle Traffic jams and long delays are a daily occurrence Seven bridge lanes mismatched with eight lanes at landings Accident rate is 2x the average accident rate on the rest of the 574-mile Thruway No lanes or shoulders for emergency services or disabled vehicles No access for pedestrians or bicyclists No mass transit capability 8

An Essential Element for the Regional Economy Serves as the critical link for 50 million vehicles per year Key access route to NYC and other areas for suburban commuters Local, regional, and interstate commercial & passenger traffic There are no nearby alternatives, and other Hudson crossings already over capacity By 2040, Westchester-Rockland corridor population to increase by 17%, jobs to increase by 33% A New New York Bridge will create or sustain at least 45,000 jobs 9

Current Bridge is Extremely Costly to Maintain $750 million spent on bridge maintenance over the past decade $3-4 billion needed for major structural overhaul and seismic protections, if bridge is not replaced Keeping current bridge means: Growing safety concerns Massive additional investment No additional capacity No mass transit component 10

Process Reform Yields Results Previous efforts to replace the bridge stalled: 13 years of study and inertia 430 public meetings 150 concepts $88 million spent Governor Cuomo initiated a new, accelerated process to bring the Project to fruition: Comprehensive and thorough review, using past studies Smart Early Work to shift risk and save money, including test pilings and soil borings Accelerated EIS process concurrent with Design- Build procurement 11

A Vital Regional Transportation Link To Last into the Next Century Built to last 100+ years Built with enhanced express commuter bus service from opening, and also to accommodate future transit: Commuter rail or Bus Rapid Transit systems During Bridge construction project, local communities achieve consensus on mass transit options and funding through regional transit task force agreed upon by Governor and County Executives 12

A Vital Regional Transportation Link To Last into the Next Century 8 traffic lanes, matching landings on both sides Dedicated lanes and wide shoulders for emergency vehicles Enhanced express commuter bus service Dedicated walkway / bikeway High-tech sensors provide real-time data on traffic and road conditions Improved toll collection and more E-Z Pass lanes 13

Comprehensive Environmental Review: A National Model Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) Widespread Public Feedback: 1,100+ people attended Public Hearings 3,000 comments received and responded to Extended 60-day comment period Public Support Shown for: Building a better, safer bridge Improving traffic operations Providing mass transit options Creating jobs 14

Mitigating Community Impacts What we heard: Concerns about noise, dust and air quality, local traffic What we are doing: Online, 24-hour real-time video, noise and air quality monitoring Stringent noise reduction measures State-of-the-art dust and exhaust emissions controls Transporting materials by barge and direct Thruway access to reduce construction traffic 15

Protecting the River Environment What we heard: Concern about endangered species, dredging, navigable waters What we are doing: Restricting dredging to three months annually Using innovative pile driving procedures, including bubble curtains to protect endangered species, and vibration installation where possible Accommodations for falcon nesting The National Marine Fisheries Service declared that the plan for building the bridge will not jeopardize endangered species 16

Transit for the Future What we heard: What we are doing: Transit options must be incorporated into the bridge Enhanced express commuter bus service on the bridge from the day it opens Hundreds of millions of dollars included in Project to make new bridge ready for BRT or commuter rail 17

Governor Cuomo Says Projected Toll is Too High Thruway, State, Federal & Local Officials will explore ways to Reduce Tolls Working with Congressional Members to maximize Federal Support Expanding discount programs to benefit Westchester & Rockland Identifying ways to lower the Cost of Credit and Borrowing Reserving Bridge toll increases for the Bridge & Regional Transportation 18

TIFIA and Project Finance Regional and National Significance The significance of the Project warrants substantial federal participation The Importance of TIFIA Support The Project will be funded by toll revenues generated from the new bridge, supporting toll revenue bonds and the TIFIA loan Ensure Regional Economic Growth A TIFIA loan equal to 49% of TIFIA-eligible Project costs, with its low interest rates and flexible repayment terms, would promote economic growth by providing an essential regional link and stabilizing toll rates for commuters, residents and local businesses as well as interstate passenger and truck traffic. 19

TIFIA Loan Request TIFIA-ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS ($ millions, year-of-expenditure dollars) $4.6B Capital Cost Case $5.4B Capital Cost Case Project Capital Costs 4,600 5,400 Non-TIFIA financing fees 35 40 BAN interest fund deposits 9 9 Toll Revenue Bonds DSRF deposits 146 171 Toll Revenue Bonds interest during construction 206 243 Total TIFIA-Eligible Project Costs 4,996 5,864 TIFIA max % of Eligible Costs 49% 49% Maximum TIFIA Loan 2,448 2,873 The Thruway Authority is requesting TIFIA loans equal to 49% of total eligible Project costs, the maximum allowable under new guidelines 20

Project Capital Cost Official Project Capital Cost: EIS Estimated Range: $4.6 billion - $5.4 billion Reviewed and affirmed by FHWA in 2012 Includes large contingencies All three submitted bids confirmed at or below $5.2 billion below maximum EIS estimate. For TIFIA Loan, $4.6 billion Capital Cost estimate included to reflect: Smart Early Work that provides more certainty on soil conditions Historic PLA agreement savings of over $450 million Competitive process in which 3 major international syndicates have submitted bids Final Project cost will be confirmed in October when preferred bidder is selected. 21

TIFIA and Project Financing TIFIA-ELIGIBLE COSTS: SOURCES & USES OF FUNDS ($ millions, year-of-expenditure dollars) $4.6B Capital Cost Case $5.4B Capital Cost Case Sources Paygo 206 243 BANs net proceeds 7 7 TIFIA proceeds 2,448 2,873 Toll Revenue Bonds 2,333 2,743 Interest Income 15 14 Capital Funds reserve (14) (16) Total Sources 4,996 5,864 Uses TZ Project Capital Costs 4,600 5,400 Non-TIFIA financing fees 35 40 BAN interest fund deposits 9 9 Toll Revenue Bonds DSRF deposits 146 171 Toll Revenue Bonds interest during construction 206 243 Total Uses 4,996 5,864 22

How Will the TIFIA Loan be Repaid? Revenues from the increase in bridge tolls will be used pay back funds borrowed for the project The TIFIA loan will benefit from a system-wide pledge of revenues generated by the Thruway Authority Thruway Authority has a more-than-50-year revenue history There are few nearby alternatives to the bridge, and current toll rates are among the lowest in the Eastern United States Authority s financial condition is strong, evidenced by its A1 / A+ credit ratings The TIFIA loan is expected to have an investment grade rating These factors would allow cost of loan to be lower than for most other TIFIA applicants. Reducing the cost of the loan allows for maximum TIFIA support for this Project, while at the same time preserving TIFIA s ability to leverage resources nationally 23

Conclusion The regional and national significance of the Project warrants significant federal participation A TIFIA loan at 49% of TIFIA-eligible Project costs will maximize the economic impact of the Project, provide an essential regional link supporting mobility and commerce in New York, New Jersey and Southern New England, and stabilize toll rates for commuters, residents and local businesses as well as interstate passenger and truck traffic With federal support, the New New York Bridge can serve as an historic, best practice model for other major projects across America 24