Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Similar documents
Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Michel TREMAUD Retired, Airbus / Aerotour / Air Martinique / Bureau Veritas. Crew Coordination. Highlighting the Monitoring Role of the PNF

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Threat & Error Mgt Training at JetBlue Airways. Captain Chris Reed Manager, AQP

MEMO AIRBUS A319/A320/A321. SOP / Flow Pattern

2014 NIFA CRM Contestant Briefing Guide San Diego, California

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 7.2 Constant-angle Nonprecision Approach

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 2.2 Crew Resource Management. Leadership.

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

09 FLIGHT MANAGEMENT, NAVIGATION

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR. OC NO 2 OF 2014 Date: 1 st May Continuous Descent Final Approach (CDFA) 1. PURPOSE

ENGINE FIRE / SEVERE DAMAGE / SEPARATION ON TAKEOFF

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Title & Image NATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ADMINSTRATION. Advisory Circular

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight crew awareness and alertness are key factors in the

Prevention of loss of communication. Air China

How To Manage Error And Violation

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Automation at Odds. A 737 stalled when a radio altimeter malfunction caused the autothrottle and autopilot to diverge during an approach to Schiphol.

MPL. 15POS03 17 June Introduction. MPL Workshop Conclusions. Basic Flying Skills. Airmanship CRM

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 3.1 Barometric Altimeter and Radio Altimeter

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 2.3 Pilot-Controller Communication

Subject: CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAMME

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 8.3 Landing Distances

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 4.2 Energy Management

Data Review and Analysis Program (DRAP) Flight Data Visualization Program for Enhancement of FOQA

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Mauro Calvano. About Aviation Safety Management Systems

SPORT PILOT TRAINING SYLLABUS

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Planning and conducting a nonprecision approach are challenging

The Assessment of Non-technical Skills in JAR-OPS and JAR-FCL

LOG OF REVISIONS Revision Page FAA Date of Number Number(s) Description Approved Approval A All Initial Release K.

General Applicability... 1 Cancellation... 1 References... 1 Effective Date... 1 Background...1. Components of CRM... 3

SYSTEM GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM LANDING TECHNOLOGY/PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Maintenance Briefing Notes

Federal Aviation Administration. Kathy Abbott and Robert Burke Federal Aviation Administration 4 February 2015

Details of Candidate. Test/check details. Date of test 1 (dd/mm/yyyy) Date of test 2 (dd/mm/yyyy) Training certificate from manufacturer

Safety Risk. Aligning perception with reality

Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance. getting to grips with. CAT II / CAT III operations

SERIOUS INCIDENT. Aircraft Type and Registration: No & Type of Engines: 2 SNECMA CFM 56-7B turbofan engines. Year of Manufacture: 1999

MODELS OF THREAT, ERROR, AND CRM IN FLIGHT OPERATIONS

Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B)

S TEC. List of Effective Pages. Record of Revisions

Threat & Error Management (TEM) SafeSkies Presentation. Ian Banks Section Head, Human Factors 27 Aug 2011

CANADIAN AVIATION REGULATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CARAC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT (NPA) CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

AVIATION SAFETY PROGRAM

Aviation Safety Prize ecfi Tasks

CREDIT REPORT FOR PILOT LICENCES OBTAINED DURING MILITARY SERVICE. (according to Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011)

Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS)

ILS Replacement. ACI World Safety Seminar November 2008 Kempinski Hotel Beijing Lufthansa Centre

March 21, Dear Ranking Member Costello:

Crew Resource Management (CRM)

Annex to Decision 2013/008/R

Beechcraft 1900D: Fuel, Emissions & Cost Savings Operational Analysis

Instrument Pilot Rating Course (ASEL) Training Syllabus FAR Part 61

12 AERO Second-Quarter 2003 April CAPT. RAY CRAIG 737 CHIEF PILOT FLIGHT OPERATIONS BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES

INITIAL TEST RESULTS OF PATHPROX A RUNWAY INCURSION ALERTING SYSTEM

CAAP 89W-1(0) Guidelines on provision of obstacle information for take-off flight planning purposes

Multi-Engine Training And The PTS

FLIGHT TRAINING (AEROPLANE) BASED ON JAR FCL - PPL(A) FLIGHT INSTRUCTION Syllabus

Example Application of Aircrew Incident Reporting System (AIRS)

Area Navigation (RNAV)/Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP s) and the New Charting Format.

Performance-based Navigation and Data Quality

Benefits of Highly Predictable Flight Trajectories in Performing Routine Optimized Profile Descents: Current and Recommended Research

Crew Resource Management: Initial 1

OPERATING MINIMA FOR AEROPLANES AND HELICOPTER OPERATIONS PURPOSE REFERENCE 4.0 DEFINITION

This section includes performance data on the King Air B200. Information consists of:

Crashed during approach, Boeing , near amsterdam schiphol airport, 25 February 2009

G1000 Search Patterns. National Emergency Services Academy Mission Aircrew School (June 2013 Rev D)

Jeppesen Mobile FliteDeck

Light Sport West Standard Flight Training Procedures for N110GX (Remos GX, 100 H.P.)

Global Positioning System Steering (GPSS) Converter Pilot s Operating Handbook

This is the fourth of a series of Atlantic Sun Airways CAT B pilot procedures and checklists for our fleet. Use them with good judgment.

and Implementing Rules for Air Operations of Community Operators F. Cross Reference Tables

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A06F0014 MISALIGNED TAKE-OFF

DRAFT. Advisory Circular. AC 121A-09(0) December 2003 HUMAN FACTORS AND CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING

INSTRUMENT RATING Practical Test Standards

Direct Approach Consulting Inc.

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A02P0004 OPERATING IRREGULARITY

PF3 ATC at its best Version History

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 5.3 Visual Illusions

Cessna 172SP & NAV III Maneuvers Checklist

Development and Validation of Procedures. ICAO PBN Seminar Development and Validation of Procedures

BOMBARDIER CRJ700. Bombardier CRJ700 Aircraft Reference

FAA-P AFS

Transcription:

Flight Operations Briefing Notes I Introduction Golden Rules have always guided human activities. In early aviation days, the defined the principles of basic airmanship. With the development of modern-technology aircraft and with research on man-machine-interface and crew-coordination, have been broadened to encompass the principles of interaction with automation and crew resources management (CRM). The operations Golden Rules defined by Airbus assist trainees in maintaining their basic airmanship as they progress to increasingly integrated and automated aircraft models. These rules apply with little modification to all Airbus models. Although developed for trainees, the are equally useful for experienced line pilots. address aspects that are considered frequent causal factors in incidents and accidents, e.g.: Inadequate situational / positional awareness; Incorrect interaction with automation; Overreliance on automation; and, Ineffective crew cross-check and mutual backup. Page 1 of 10

II Statistical Data The following factors frequently are identified as causal factor in approach-and-landing accidents: Factor % of Events Inadequate decision making 74 % Omission of action or inappropriate action 72 % Inadequate CRM practice (crew coordination, cross-check and backup) Insufficient horizontal or vertical situational awareness Inadequate or insufficient understanding of prevailing conditions 63 % 52 % 48 % Slow or delayed crew action 45 % Flight handling difficulties 45 % Incorrect or incomplete pilot / controller communication 33 % Interaction with automation 20 % ( Source : Flight Safety Foundation 1998-1999 ) Table 1 Most Frequent Causal Factors in Approach-and-Landing Accidents III General Golden Rules The following eight are applicable in normal conditions and, more importantly, in any unanticipated or abnormal / emergency condition. III.1 Automated aircraft can be flown like any other aircraft To promote this rule, each trainee should be given the opportunity to fly the simulator just using the yoke / sidestick, rudder and throttles / thrust levers. Page 2 of 10

The use of flight director (FD), autopilot (AP), autothrottle/autothrust (A/THR) and flight management system (FMS) should be introduced progressively, as defined by the applicable training syllabus. Practice of hand flying will illustrate that the pilot flying (PF) always retains the authority and capability to adopt: A more direct level of automation; or revert to, Hand flying, directly controlling the aircraft trajectory and energy. III.2 Fly, Navigate, Communicate and Manage in that order Task sharing should be adapted to the prevailing situation (i.e., task sharing for hand flying or with AP engaged, task sharing for normal operation or for abnormal / emergency conditions, as defined in the applicable FCOM) and tasks should be accomplished in accordance with the following priorities: Fly ( Aviate ) : PF must concentrate on flying the aircraft (i.e., by controlling and/or monitoring the pitch attitude, bank angle, airspeed, thrust, sideslip, heading,...) to capture and maintain the desired targets, vertical flight path and lateral flight path. PNF must backup the PF by monitoring flight parameters and by calling any excessive deviation. Navigate : Select the desired modes for vertical navigation and lateral navigation (i.e., selected modes or FMS-managed navigation), being aware of surrounding terrain and minimum safe altitude. This rule can be summarized by the following three know where statements of situational-awareness : Know where you are; Know where you should be; and, Know where the terrain and obstacles are. Communicate : Effective crew communication involves communications between flight crew and controller, between flight crew members and between flight crew and cabin crew. Communication allows sharing goals and intentions and enhancing crew s situational awareness. In an abnormal or emergency condition, after a stable flight path has been regained and the abnormal or emergency condition has been identified, the PF should inform the ATC of the prevailing condition and of his/her intentions. Page 3 of 10

To attract the controller s attention, use the following standard phraseology, as applicable: Pan Pan Pan Pan Pan Pan; or Mayday Mayday Mayday. Manage : Managing the continuation of the flight is the next priority, this includes: Managing aircraft systems (e.g., fuel management, diversion management, etc); and, Performing applicable emergency and/or abnormal procedure(s). Specific Golden Rules to assist flight crew in their decision-making and management process are provided in the second part of this Flight Operations Briefing Note. The design of glass-cockpit aircraft fully supports the above four-step strategy, as summarized in Table 2. Golden Rule Fly Navigate Communicate Manage Display Unit PFD ND DCDU ECAM, FMS CDU Table 2 Glass-cockpit Design Supports Golden Rules III.3 One head up at all times Significant changes to the FMS flight plan should be performed by PNF and crosschecked by PF, after transfer of controls, in order to maintain one head up at all times for supervising the progress of the flight and aircraft systems (on PFD, ND and ECAM display units). III.4 Cross check the accuracy of the FMS with raw data When within navaids coverage area, FMS navigation accuracy should be cross-checked against navaids raw-data (unless aircraft is GPS-equipped and GPS PRIMARY is available). Page 4 of 10

FMS navigation accuracy can be checked by: Entering a tuned VOR-DME in the bearing/distance (BRG / DIST TO) field of the appropriate FMS page; Comparing the resulting FMS DIST TO reading with the DME distance read on the RMI (or on ND, as applicable); Checking the difference between FMS DIST TO and DME distance against the criteria applicable for the flight phase (as defined in SOPs). If the required FMS navigation accuracy criteria is not achieved, revert from NAV mode to selected heading mode with reference to navaids raw-data. Select PF ND to ARC or ROSE mode. If no map shift is observed, PNF may keep ND in MAP mode, with display of speed constraints and/or altitude constraints, for enhanced horizontal and vertical situational awareness. III.5 Know your guidance at all times The Flight Control Unit (FCU) and FMS Control Display Unit (CDU) and keyboard are the prime interfaces for the crew to communicate with aircraft systems (i.e., to arm modes or engage modes and to set targets). The Primary Flight Display (PFD) - particularly the Flight Modes Annunciator (FMA) section and target symbols on speed scale and altitude scale - and Navigation Display (ND) are the prime interfaces for the aircraft to communicate with the crew, to confirm that the aircraft systems have correctly accepted the flight crew s mode selections and target entries. Any action on FCU or on FMS keyboard / line-select keys should be confirmed by crosschecking the corresponding annunciation or data on PFD and/or ND. At all times, the PF and PNF should be aware of: Modes armed or engaged; Guidance targets set; Aircraft response in terms of attitude, speed and trajectory; and, Mode transitions or reversions. III.6 When things don t go as expected, Take over If the aircraft does not follow the desired vertical flight path / lateral flight path or the selected targets, and time does not permit analyzing and solving the observed behavior, revert without delay from: FMS guidance to selected guidance; or from, Selected guidance to hand flying. Page 5 of 10

III.7 Use the correct level of automation for the task On highly automated and integrated aircraft, several levels of automation are available to perform a given task: FMS modes and guidance; or, Selected modes and guidance. The correct level of automation depends on: The task to be performed: short-term (tactical) task; or, long-term (strategic) task; The flight phase: departure, enroute, terminal area or approach-and-landing; and, The time available: normal selection or entry; or, last-minute change. The correct level of automation often is the one the pilot feels the most comfortable with, depending on his/her knowledge and experience of the aircraft and systems, skills and confidence. Reversion to hand-flying and manual thrust-control may be the correct level of automation, for the prevailing conditions. III.8 Practice task sharing and back-up each other Task sharing, effective cross-check and backup should be practiced in all phases of ground and flight operation, in normal operation or in abnormal / emergency conditions. Emergency, abnormal and normal procedures (i.e., normal checklists) should be performed as directed by the ECAM and/or QRH, e.g. : In case of an emergency condition: emergency procedure; normal checklist (as applicable); and, abnormal procedure(s). Page 6 of 10

In case of an abnormal condition: abnormal procedure down to the STATUS page; normal checklist (as applicable); and, resuming abnormal procedure(s). These actions should be accomplished in accordance with the published task sharing, crew coordination principles and phraseology. Critical or irreversible actions, such as selecting an engine fuel lever / master switch or a fuel isolation valve to OFF, should be accomplished by the PNF but require prior confirmation by the PF (i.e., confirmation loop). IV The Golden Rules Card The GOLDEN RULES card has been developed to promote and disseminate the. The card is provided to all trainees attending a flight-crew-training course at an Airbus Training Center (i.e., in Toulouse, Miami and Beijing). Figure 3 Golden Rules Card Page 7 of 10

V Golden Rules for Abnormal and Emergency Conditions The following additional rules may assist flight crew in their decision making when in an abnormal or emergency condition, but also when faced with a condition or circumstance that is beyond the scope of published procedures. V.1 Understand the prevailing condition before acting Incorrect decisions often are the result of an incorrect recognition and identification of the actual prevailing condition. V.2 Assess risks and time pressures Take time to make time, by: Delaying actions, when possible (e.g., during takeoff and final approach); and/or, Requesting entering a holding pattern or requesting delaying vectors (as appropriate). V.3 Review and evaluate the available options Consider weather conditions, crew preparedness, type of operation, airport proximity and self-confidence when selecting the preferred option. Include all flight crewmembers, cabin crew, ATC and company maintenance, as required, in this evaluation (as applicable). Consider all implications before deciding and plan for contingencies. Consider all the aspects of the continuation of the flight until landing and reaching a complete stop. V.4 Match the response to the situation An emergency condition requires an immediate action (this does not mean a rushed action) whereas abnormal conditions may tolerate a delayed action. V.5 Manage workload Adhere to the defined task sharing for abnormal / emergency conditions to reduce workload and optimize flight crew resources. Use AP-A/THR, if available, to alleviate the PF workload. Use the correct level of automation for the task and circumstances. Page 8 of 10

V.6 Create a shared problem model with other crewmembers Communicate with other flight and cabin crewmembers to create a shared understanding of : Prevailing condition(s); and, Planned actions. Creating a shared problem model allows crewmembers to work with a common reference towards a common and well-understood objective. V.7 Apply recommended procedures and other agreed actions Understand the reasons and implications of any action before acting and check the result(s) of each action before proceeding with the next step. Beware of irreversible actions (i.e., apply strict confirmation and cross-check before acting). VI Summary of Key Points constitute a set of key points for safe operation under normal, abnormal and emergency conditions. If only one lesson were to be learned from the above set of Operation Golden Rules, the following is proposed: Whatever the prevailing condition(s), always ensure that one pilot is controlling and monitoring the flight path of the aircraft. VII Associated Briefing Notes The following Flight Operations Briefing Notes can be referred to, for further illustrating and developing the above information: Operating Philosophy, Optimum Use of Automation, Use of Normal Checklists, CRM Issues in Incidents and Accidents. Page 9 of 10

VIII Regulatory References ICAO Human Factors Training Manual (Doc 9683). FAA AC 60-22 Aeronautical Decision Making. This Flight Operations Briefing Note (FOBN) has been developed by Airbus in the frame of the Approach-and-Landing Accident Reduction (ALAR) international task force led by the Flight Safety Foundation. This FOBN is part of a set of Flight Operations Briefing Notes that provide an overview of the applicable standards, flying techniques and best practices, operational and human factors, suggested company prevention strategies and personal lines-of-defense related to major threats and hazards to flight operations safety. This FOBN is intended to enhance the reader's flight safety awareness but it shall not supersede the applicable regulations and the Airbus or airline's operational documentation; should any deviation appear between this FOBN and the Airbus or airline s AFM / (M)MEL / FCOM / QRH / FCTM, the latter shall prevail at all times. In the interest of aviation safety, this FOBN may be reproduced in whole or in part - in all media - or translated; any use of this FOBN shall not modify its contents or alter an excerpt from its original context. Any commercial use is strictly excluded. All uses shall credit Airbus and the Flight Safety Foundation. Airbus shall have no liability or responsibility for the use of this FOBN, the correctness of the duplication, adaptation or translation and for the updating and revision of any duplicated version. Airbus Customer Services Flight Operations Support and Line Assistance 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte - 31707 BLAGNAC CEDEX FRANCE FOBN Reference : FLT_OPS SOP SEQ 03 REV 02 JAN. 2004 Page 10 of 10