Editorial: Preparing Teachers for Tomorrow's Technologies

Similar documents
Use of Digital Fabrication to Incorporate Engineering Design Principles in Elementary Mathematics Education

The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Technology

The Educational Psychology and Educational Technology Program Michigan State University

Defining Education Research: Continuing the Conversation

Department of Child & Family Development Promotion and Tenure Guidelines November 2004

Participants Teachers and other education professionals concerned with mathematics education from all phases of schooling.

Auditing education courses using the TPACK framework as a preliminary step to enhancing ICTs

Educational Technology, TPACK, and 21 st Century Learners: An Instructional Technology Philosophy. Callah Stoicoiu

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Nursing Legacy CON Faculty

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

Using a collaborative investigation and design strategy to support digital resource development in an online unit of study

Course Specification

Course Specification. MA Physical Education (MPHYE) LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY

The Teacher-Scholar at Skagit Valley College Tom Keegan and Kenneth Lawson Summer, 2013 DRAFT

College of Education Clinical Faculty Appointment and Promotion Criteria Provost Approved 11/11/11

REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF EDUCATION (MEd)

College of Nursing and Professional Disciplines Instructional Design Strategic Plan

Learning and Teaching

Ironside, Pamela Indiana University School of Nursing

A. The master of arts, educational studies program will allow students to do the following.

Environmental Science/ Environmental Geology M. S.

Doctoral Program in Mathematics Education Outcomes Assessment

PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM STANDARDS FACULTY OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM Revised 05/18/2016

College of Education and Health Professions School of Nursing

Peace operations 2010 reform strategy (excerpts from the report of the Secretary-General)

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MA TESOL

Wednesday, April 20, 2016 Friday, April 22, 2016 Newport Beach, CA

School of Accountancy Promotion and Tenure Guidelines Adopted 05/05/11

Department of Marketing Promotion and Tenure Guidelines February 2011

Civil & Environmental Engineering

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND LETTERS GRADUATE TEACHING CERTIFICATION STANDARDS

The current ( ) Marketing Ph.D. Committee consists of Greg M. Allenby (Committee Chair), Xiaoyan Deng, Nino Hardt, and Rebecca Walker Reczek.

Professional Journals. by Amanda DeCardy EDD 8008 CRN Principles of Instructional Technology

Department of Social Work. Departmental Guidelines for Tenure, Promotion and Post- Tenure Review for AY

Clemson University College of Health, Education, and Human Development School of Nursing Promotion, Tenure, and Appointment Renewal Guidelines

Texas A&M University Graduate and Professional Student Council Aggies Commit to Graduate and Professional Student Educational Experiences Fellowship

PhD Program Outcomes*

The 2nd Elementary Education International Conference

SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE

Online communities of practice in education

WHY QUALITY MATTERS: STRATEGIES FOR DESIGNING QUALITY E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

CV Checklist. F a c u l t y D o s s i e r. John Doe CV and Grants Page For submission of faculty dossier to PSOM COAP and PSC. General Information

Senior Lecturer - MA Education: TESOL (Teaching English to Speakers of other Languages) and Programme Director

M. CRITERIA FOR FACULTY EVALUATION

QAA Good Practice Knowledgebase case study. University of Reading: Web-based support for assessment

Our Learned Learning Society of Information Technology and Teacher Education

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY FACULTY QUALIFICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Promotion and Tenure Guidelines

Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London

Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London

Expanding Distance Learning Through Videoconferencing. Joan Hanor, Ph.D. Professor California State University San Marcos

Programme Specifications

In Pursuit of Excellence and Equity Gevirtz Graduate School of Education Strategic Plan

Course Specification. MSc Audio Engineering (MSADE) LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY

Department of Business STANDARD PROFESSIONAL EXPECTATIONS

Instructional Technology Standards Proposed by the GaPSC Instructional Technology Task Force December 2010

Programme Specification. Doctor of Education. Valid from: Sept 2015 Programme Code: PX3AA

REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF EDUCATION (MEd)

USASBE Call for Papers Workshops Cases. January 10-13, 2013 Marriott San Francisco San Francisco, CA

Bridges Across Brooklyn: Community-Based Learning in the Brooklyn College General Education Curriculum

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Educational Planning, Economics, and International Development

AWARDING INSTITUTION/BODY:

Delivered in an Online Format. Revised November 1, I. Perspectives

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE AWARD IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES

Strategic Plan The College of Arts and Sciences. Vision. Leading the Way in Academics, Research and Public Engagement

UAF-UAA Joint PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology with Rural, Indigenous Emphasis Outcomes Assessment Goals, Objectives, and Benchmarks

Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

Case Method for Computing Education (CMCE)

Adopted: May, 2006 (Pub. List revised Nov.2008) PROMOTION AND TENURE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING James Madison University

Programs That Prepare Teachers to Work Effectively With Students Learning English December 2000 Josué M. González and Linda Darling-Hammond

School of Architecture and Interior Design Criteria for Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

Graduate Faculty Constitution

Turku School of Economics: Strategy for

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

GOGOT SUHARWOTO AND MAGGIE NIESS Oregon State University Corvallis, OR USA and

DOCTORAL HANDBOOK IN MUSIC EDUCATION

ONE YEAR COURSES FASHION IMAGE & STYLING INTENSIVE

Comparative Analysis of PhD programs in Engineering Education

COLLEGE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES School of Nursing. Guidelines for Promotion, Tenure and Reappointment (Effective May, 2007)

GORDON F. HOLBEIN, Ph.D.

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

filqfl The Galifornia State University

Using Adult Education Principles to Provide Professional Development for the Foundations of Inclusion

b. A handout for your MATESOL Conference presentation

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration. Proposal for a Clinical Faculty Track

Programme Specification. BA (Hons) Education Studies. Valid from: March 2014 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Guest Editorial: Digital Videos as Tools for Learning Mathematics

Sharing Open Educational Resources in Multilanguage Repositories - the Learning Resource Exchange and Scientix

THE GLOBAL elearning JOURNAL VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1, 2015

The additional Political Science Program Standards, where relevant, appear in italics.

COMPARISON OF CLINICIAN TEACHER AND SALARIED CLINICAL FACULTY PATHWAYS, PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES 9/22/14

MERLOT. Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching

Assessment and feedback principles - draft for consultation

DOCTORAL DEGREE IN EDUCATION. Ed.D. Leadership in Schooling

MA EDUCATION MA Education: Childhood and Youth Studies MA Education: Higher Education MA Education: Leadership and Management MA Education: TESOL

Online Class* Development Guidelines Middlesex Community College March 11, 2015

M.A. /M.S. in Education Purdue University College of Education

PROCEDURES AND EVALUATIVE GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION OF TERM FACULTY DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY MARCH 31, 2014

INTRODUCTION AND SUGGESTIONS FOR VITA PREPARATION COLLEGE OF SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES

Transcription:

Dilworth, P., Donaldson, A., George, M., Knezek, D., Searson, M., Starkweather, K., Strutchens, M., Tillotson, J., & Robinson, S. (2012). Editorial: Preparing teachers for tomorrow's technologies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 1-5. Editorial: Preparing Teachers for Tomorrow's Technologies Paulette Dilworth, Ana Donaldson, Marshall George, Don Knezek, Mike Searson, Kendall Starkweather, Marilyn Strutchens, John Tillotson, and Sharon Robinson Technology is rapidly changing how we teach and how we learn. Emergent technologies offer opportunities to understand concepts in deeper, often different, and more meaningful ways. However, this growth in understanding will occur only if teachers learn to use these technologies in effective ways. The federal initiative, Preparing Tomorrow s Teachers to Use Technology (PT3), was launched in 1999 to address this challenge. Startup funding to establish the National Technology Leadership Coalition (NTLC) was included among the 400 grants awarded through this effort. The NTLC includes representation by the teacher educator associations for the core content areas and corresponding educational technology associations. The teacher educator content associations currently include mathematics education (AMTE), science education (ASTE), social studies (NCSS/CUFA), and English language arts (NCTE/CEE). In addition, the International Technology and Engineering Association (ITEEA) contributes expertise in that area. Establishment of Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (the CITE Journal) was one of the first actions undertaken by the NTLC associations. An article by the director of the PT3 program, Tom Carroll, published in the first issue of the CITE Journal, outlined the goals of the program (Carroll, 2000). Reviewers selected by the aforementioned associations edit their corresponding sections in the CITE Journal. Two sections of the CITE Journal (the General and Current Practice sections) are sponsored by the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE), also a member of the NTLC. Additional educational technology associations participating in the NTLC include the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) and the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) serves as host for an annual National Technology Leadership Summit (NTLS) in which member associations participate. Its Innovation and Technology Committee members connect the work of NTLC and AACTE. 1

The Emergence of a Framework: TPACK Three essential types of knowledge technological knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and content knowledge emerged as a framework for collaborative work across associations. The framework of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK; Mishra & Koehler, 2006) builds upon Shulman s (1986) notion of pedagogical content knowledge. Pedagogical knowledge goes beyond knowledge of subject matter, involving understanding of effective strategies for teaching a subject in ways that make it comprehensible. TPACK involves an interaction among all three forms of knowledge technological knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and content knowledge. In other words, the most effective uses of technology also require a deep understanding of content and related pedagogical strategies. Teacher educators comprising these content associations are, therefore, best positioned to understand how technology may be best employed within their specific disciplines. Hence the organization of the CITE Journal is configured around this framework. The TPACK framework has been influential, as evidenced by more than 200 related articles in peer-reviewed journals, two theme issues of peer-reviewed journals (including a TPACK-themed issue of the CITE Journal), and more than a dozen doctoral dissertations to date. The upcoming fourth edition of AECT's Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology will contain a chapter on TPACK, evidence that this framework is maturing and influencing both research and practice. The AACTE Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (2008) is a seminal work for this area that has been translated into Chinese and other languages, affecting practice in many other countries as well as the United States. A chapter in the AACTE Handbook, Advancing TPACK through Collaboration across Educational Associations, describes the contributions of the NTLC associations. The single largest category of submissions for the most recent SITE conference was the TPACK strand. Apparently, presenters are increasingly aware of the need to prepare teachers to integrate disciplinary knowledge, technological knowledge, and pedagogical knowledge. However, many experienced educators have not yet fully assimilated implications for teaching. Even though a large number of proposals related to TPACK are submitted at many teacher education conferences, panels of reviewers with expertise in this area report that a significant percentage of these proposals do not fully reflect best practices related to TPACK. Often these papers do not incorporate the three areas of requisite knowledge in an appropriate way. If the teacher education faculty members who prepare future teachers do not fully understand the practical implications of this framework, there is little chance that tomorrow s teachers will be able to employ technology effectively. Teacher Education Initiative (TEI) In light of this continuing need, the NTLC associations are collaborating with Microsoft to develop a Teacher Education Initiative (TEI). TEI builds upon Microsoft s Partners in Learning Program (PIL), a ten-year, $500 million global initiative that supports educators use of technology in K-12 schools. The goal of the initiative is to ensure that future teachers are prepared to use technology effectively by building upon prior work 2

such as the PT3 and PIL initiatives and continuing to advance this effort by incorporating new and emergent technologies. Working in concert with the NTLC teacher educator content associations, a series of TEI modules have been commissioned for each content area. The modules will include a variety of activities that will provide teacher education faculty members with contentbased technology exemplars that teacher education faculty can do with their preservice teachers to help them develop TPACK. Experienced teacher educators from each association are developing modules for their respective disciplinary areas. Many of these activities have been previously presented in workshops with both teacher education faculty and K-12 teachers at professional conferences of each discipline, and have been revised based on feedback from those presentations. These resources will now be made available through an online openeducation site to make them accessible to all teacher education faculty members working with preservice teachers. Each module will reflect guidelines for best practice in the respective area or discipline. Because the activities and examples will be grounded in each disciplinary area, integrating both pedagogy and content, they will be grounded in the perspective of TPACK. Punya Mishra, a scholar who has written extensively about the TPACK framework (see tpack.org), is developing the first module of the series that will introduce this concept. The modules will serve as an additional resource for teacher preparation programs, but by themselves cannot be expected to achieve significant change. To facilitate dialog regarding the most effective ways to incorporate these materials into teacher preparation, a series of seminars will be offered to faculty members worldwide. These highly interactive seminars will provide experiences for faculty members to learn and practice using technology in their respective disciplinary areas as well as additional support to then develop their own ideas. The goal of this far-reaching endeavor is to facilitate effective integration of technology by teacher educators from the majority of teacher preparation programs in the United States. The seminars introducing content in the TEI modules will be made available without charge to participating teacher education faculty members. Pilot seminars are scheduled for the SITE and ISTE conferences in the spring and summer of this year to allow NTLC leaders to provide input and feedback prior to broader dissemination. In addition to seminars at meetings of participating professional associations, a series of regional workshops at universities at different areas of the country will also be scheduled. Mark Hofer, former editor of the Current Practice section of the CITE Journal, is collaborating with the TEI module developers to create a series of supportive teaching cases for each content area. These teaching cases will illustrate effective practice in each content area through collaboration with classroom teachers. Each teaching case will provide illustrative video of a teacher working with K-12 students, samples of student work, reflections by the teacher, and commentary by teacher educators. The Practitioner s Guide to TPACK The teaching cases developed in this manner will form the nucleus of a book, the Practitioner s Guide to TPACK, and it will include additional teaching cases from other sources, as well. The book will serve as a companion to the AACTE Handbook of 3

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. The AACTE Handbook provides a theoretical framework for TPACK as an approach to incorporating technology in teaching. The Practitioner s Guide will provide concrete examples that illustrate TPACK in action in each content area. Lynn Bell, co-editor of the CITE Journal, will serve as editor of the Practitioner s Guide to TPACK in collaboration with Mark Hofer. The TEI teaching cases are intended to be illustrative rather than prescriptive. There are dozens of ways in which technology might be effectively used in each content area, and the teaching cases showcased in the Practitioner s Guide to TPACK will provide an introduction only to a handful of these approaches. To provide a mechanism for highlighting the diverse ways in which technology can be used, a peer-review process for publishing additional teaching cases will be established. If sufficient need exists, the possibility of developing an additional section of the CITE Journal will be explored. This would provide a process for submission of teaching cases that will be published after peer review. Evaluation and Research These plans to better prepare tomorrow s teachers to use technology, facilitating integration of technology in teacher preparation programs, requires a method for determining the extent to which these efforts are enhancing the field. The NTLC Editors include the editors of peer-reviewed journals published by the associations affiliated with NTLC. By virtue of their editorial positions, the NTLC editors are familiar with current trends in the field and are also in a position to facilitate and encourage dissemination of best practices. On several occasions the NTLC editors have coordinated publication of a series of editorials across all of their respective journals as a way of connecting with the membership of participating associations. The NTLC Editors have agreed collectively to constitute a research and evaluation panel for these efforts. This will include two objectives: (a) identification of desired objectives and goals that may occur as a result of these efforts, and (b) identification of benchmarks that may be used to measure whether these objectives are being achieved. Conclusion The associations that collectively publish this journal established it with the intent of providing a peer-reviewed resource for teacher preparation programs. The CITE Journal employs TPACK as a framework, focusing on best practices for integration of technology in each discipline. Despite the progress that has been made, there is still a continuing need to explore how emergent technologies can best be integrated into teaching and teacher preparation. The steps described in this editorial provide an overview of the most recent plans across the NTLC teacher education associations to address their stated goal of increasing the use of emergent technologies to teach content across disciplines. References American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Committee on Technology and Innovation (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 4

Carroll, T. G. (2000). If we didn t have the schools we have today, would we create the schools we have today? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 117-140. Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/currentissues/general/article1.htm Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Author Information Paulette Dilworth, Auburn University, is chair of the National Council for the Social Studies College and University Faculty Assembly. Ana Donaldson is president of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Marshall George, Fordham University, is chair of the National Council of Teachers of English Conference on English Education. Don Knezek is chief executive officer of the International Society for Technology in Education. Mike Searson, Kean University, is president of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. Kendall Starkweather is executive director of the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. Marilyn Strutchens, Auburn University, is president of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. John Tillotson, Syracuse University, is president of the Association for Science Teacher Education. Sharon P. Robinson is president and CEO of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education is an online journal. All text, tables, and figures in the print version of this article are exact representations of the original. However, the original article may also include video and audio files, which can be accessed on the World Wide Web at http://www.citejournal.org 5